Slashdot Mirror


Satellite Captures Burning Man From Space

MikeCapone writes "A European Space Agency satellite has captured what has become one of modern society's most hedonistic adventures: Burning Man. Taken about 400 miles up, the picture shows Black Rock City in full swing along with all of its 50,000-something attendees. ESA compiled the photograph using four photos, each with a resolution of about 16 feet. " The ESA has a high resolution version of the image available.

19 of 141 comments (clear)

  1. There are easier ways... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are easier ways to see pictures of naked hippies.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:There are easier ways... by ByOhTek · · Score: 5, Funny

      With the age they are now? I think it is probably easier on the eyes this way. Anything with 2-foot or better resolution could be quite unpleasant.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:There are easier ways... by kenj0418 · · Score: 2

      There are easier ways to see pictures of naked hippies.

      But not without getting closer to them.

      In space, no one can... smell that you haven't bathed in a month.

  2. Nuke it from orbit by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the only way to be sure to get rid of those damn hippies - Eric Cartman

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  3. nice headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you don't take the time to figure out what a Burning Man is, the headline by itself is quite perplexing and intriguing.

    How is this man burning in space where there is no oxygen? And what does the satellite do with this man after capturing him?

  4. 1m (3ft) resolution vs 16ft? by Hadlock · · Score: 2

    Is anybody else a little shocked that that photograph is shot at 16ft (4.8m) resolution? I'm assuming they mean 1:16 or 1 pixel to 16 ft. That seems like the sort of resolution you might get from a stop end film spy satellite from the 1960's. I would have figured that we would be down to 1m or 0.3m (1ft) resolution by now.
     
    Or are public images severely degraded to not give away the more obscure pros and cons of their imaging systems at actual resolution? The pictures of the moon landers seemed awfully crisp compared to this, although one was flying at 24km (presumably with a much smaller camera) vs a geopolar orbit at (searches wikipedia) 1000km. Also presumably with a much larger camera.
     
    What's average resolution these days for satellite imagery? That seems awfully low.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:1m (3ft) resolution vs 16ft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This was not a normal satellite. This is a micro-satellite called proba-1. This is why the resolution is relatively low compared to what you can get elsewhere. http://www.esa.int/esaMI/Proba_web_site/index.html

  5. So when does the ESA get sued by CaptSlaq · · Score: 2
    1. Re:So when does the ESA get sued by hedwards · · Score: 2

      That raises an interesting point, to what extent does reasonable expectation of privacy apply to satellite imaging?

  6. It Looks Like The Suburbs by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 2

    I have seen many subdivision layouts that looked just like this. Has Burning Man gone the way of Desperate Housewives?

  7. Re:what a great place to watch burning man from by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

    I've got to admit, that had me concerned as well.

    With such a satellite, the Europeans can count the number of hippies we have. Then they can generate more hippies than us!

    Mr President, we cannot have a hippie gap!

  8. Or look at the GeoEye .5m resolution image by Tyger · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.geeked.info/burning-man-2011-geoeye-satellite-image/

    I can't believe the 16ft resolution image is getting so much press, when the 0.5m resolution image is so much better, and was announced ahead of time (And scheduled, as you can see from people forming shapes in it).

  9. Re:In lieu of the moon or Mars by Joce640k · · Score: 2

    often times it's just more convenient to use a UAV anways.

    But not as cool. And that's one cool looking satellite. The Borg couldn't have designed it any better.

    --
    No sig today...
  10. Oblig.. by wiredog · · Score: 2
  11. Re:In lieu of the moon or Mars by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Funny

    You can see pretty much anything "from space". Find yourself a strong enough lens or a low enough orbit, and "I can see my house from here".

    Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I can move my house from here.
    -Archimedes

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  12. That's some insane skydiving! by Beelzebud · · Score: 2

    The headline was enough for me. Anyone who skydives from an altitude where they can burst into re-entry flames, and be caught by a satellite is just nuts!

  13. Re:The Borg have come... by WhiplashII · · Score: 2

    Interestingly enough, the normal drag paradigm does not apply, however.

    It is more accurate to look at it as if the air molecules wander over, attach to the satellite for a while, and then wander away. The key difference being that the side of the object facing orthogonal to the orbit "drags" almost as much as the front. So a cube is actually better than a cylinder or cone! (Not better than a sphere, though)

    Weird stuff!

    --
    while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
  14. Re:Burning Nags by Migraineman · · Score: 2

    Compare this to car racing. For a typical SCCA single-race weekend, you pay about $300 for your entry fee. That money buys you access to the facility ... approximately the same "fuckall" available at Burning Man. You bring your race car, food, water, fuel. You participate in the event - most events require one or more representatives from your team to volunteer as corner workers, timing & scoring, tech inspection, etc. At the end of the event, you pick up your stuff and leave. I have friends who thing racing is categorically insane for the reasons you mention - lots of work to drive around in circles for a weekend.

    These events are explicitly transient (both BM and racing.) BM is not a permanent activity that would otherwise be sustainable. And if you don't see the significance and spirituality of the closing event at Burning Man, might I suggest that you just book a room in Vegas instead?

  15. Re:Burning Nags by painandgreed · · Score: 2

    Been there. Done that. Criticizing what I experienced firsthand. But thanks for playing...

    Oh, you're one of those. Go, have a bad time while never contributing anything, and then bitch about it for years even though your complaints have little relevance any more.