Slashdot Mirror


Essential Open Source Tools For Windows Admins

snydeq writes "InfoWorld's J. Peter Bruzzese provides a list of 15 open source tools for enhancing your Windows server-side experience. 'You might imagine that the best place to go for improving your Microsoft server-side experience is to the mothership itself. In many cases, you would be right. But the truth is there are a meaningful number of open source tools that go above and beyond what Microsoft has to offer in support of Windows Server, Exchange, SQL, and SharePoint. Many of these alternatives provide — for free — more powerful capabilities than what you'd get with third-party retail products.'"

23 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. Easy by aglider · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linux

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:Easy by said213 · · Score: 2

      "Or are you suggesting they throw away all their desktops, their hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of dollars in windows software, and pay a giant team of developers to rewrite all that from scratch just so....they can what? Say they are leet?"

      This.

      "you are incredibly naive about what these machines actually do or you are a total zealot who would be happy to torpedo a company..."

      Neither. With such knowledge, one can appreciate how and where resources are wasted. It's less a question of "what these machines do" than it is a question of what these machines *cannot* do... and the list of "cannot do" is vastly greater in reference to MS powered servers than the list of "cannot *yet* do" is in reference to the capabilities of a *NIX system. One is controlled by artificial limitations, the other is limited by artificial controls.

      --
      help me fix this "Terrible" karma, please!
    2. Re:Easy by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      So let me see if I have this straight, You are ADVOCATING throwing away a working turnkey solution for a "solution" that consists of a half a dozen programs, none of which are design to go together or are even by the same teams, will take a hell of a lot more work, and is at risk of breaking any second when one of those separate teams puts out an important update that hoses the rest, and you are saying you're NOT a zealot?

      People you realize this kind of crazy loony tune bullshit makes you ALL look like nutballs, yes? that the reason Linux has the rep of the OS for crazy basement dwellers is EXACTLY because of what guys like you post, right? You mod down anyone who doesn't drink the koolaid, and when they point out something your OS can NOT DO, you say "sure it can" and then bring out the most backwards ass halfbaked solution that nobody with a functioning brain would EVER use in a fortune 500 company!

      If you want to sell your product you have to have sane arguments folks. You can't go foaming at the mouth that Bill Gates is secretly running the Illuminati, and you sure as hell aren't gonna sell your product by saying a bunch of half assed products that aren't even designed by the same teams or guaranteed to work together equals a drop in turnkey solution. This kind of BS just makes you all look like zealots, and hurts the cause more than a thousand MSFT "Get the facts" campaigns because it smacks so badly of religious bullshit. Why didn't you just write "Free as in freedom, fight teh powerz!" while you were at it?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. #1 tool by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cygwin is the first thing every windows server needs installed.

    1. Re:#1 tool by Stavr0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agree, but I prefer http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ -- less powerful but plays nicer with Windows native APIs

    2. Re:#1 tool by jsnipy · · Score: 3, Informative

      needs more sysinternals

      --
      -- if you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine
    3. Re:#1 tool by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 2

      A lot of times it boils down to familiarity and convenience, especially in a place that has a mix of Unixy and Windows servers. I don't think Powershell is missing anything except the ability to run bash scripts.

    4. Re:#1 tool by Handbasket+Passenger · · Score: 2

      Seems that this post is referring to non-MS tools... since MS acquired Sysinternals, it goes to reason they wouldn't include it. A little post-article mention of Sysinternals and other very useful free/cheap tools from MS would have been appreciated (I.E. Windebug, SOS) if you're reading this, Mr. Bruzzese

    5. Re:#1 tool by David+Gerard · · Score: 2

      Cygwin and its sshd. Being able to ssh into Windows boxes is essential.

      Cygwin is also just the thing if you're using Nagios - you can write bash scripts to use as plugins.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    6. Re:#1 tool by Kalriath · · Score: 2

      I don't see why being able to SSH into Windows machines is essential at all. If you're that obsessed with only having a command line, Windows comes with a perfectly tolerable Telnet server. But other than that, you have Remote Desktop, which is far superior. SSH is not needed.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  3. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  4. Re:ClamWin Seriously? by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    Really? Do you consider Symantec to be that much better? What experience have you had? In my experience all virus protection is somewhat haphazard.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  5. Netmon by Gitcho · · Score: 2

    While I truly love wireshark, if we're talking microsoft server admin, you might want to think about Microsoft Network Monitor (current ver == 3.4). It does most of what wireshark does but pairs packet streams to windows processes. If you're on an enterprise premier support call with Microsoft, they'll only accept a pcap from netmon.

  6. Re:UltraDefrag (fail) by hedwards · · Score: 2

    Probably because we have better things to do than to hit defrag whenever the fragmentation hits 15% or so and that the built in defrag can't defrag files that are in use at the time. A lot of the 3rd party utilties will allow you to have them run automatically every week or two so that you don't have to pay attention to that. Additionally, some of the 3rd party utilities use the same algorithms that the official defragger uses to accomplish the task.

  7. Re:Lose the Borg Face by camperdave · · Score: 2

    Hover your mouse pointer over the borg face and your question will be answered. Since this is a story about tools for Microsoft servers, it was tagged with the Microsoft icon.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  8. Re:UltraDefrag (fail) by magamiako1 · · Score: 2

    Windows 7 and Vista automatically defragment without user interaction.

    Bonus points is the 7 defragmenter will disable itself on SSDs automatically as well.

  9. PuTTY by bpfinn · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use PuTTY daily.

  10. Re:I hate InfoWorld by Amouth · · Score: 2

    while i am a fan of MS security essentials for end users - MS intentional prevent it from running on their server OS's. (and for good reason, it's not designed for that workload environment). so when it comes to free ClamAV is up there on the server side.

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  11. Re:My Picks by afidel · · Score: 2

    Add Putty, and if you do a lot with AD the joeware tools aren't open source but they are gratis and extremely useful.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  12. Re:Indeed by PCM2 · · Score: 2

    I don't have a need to run a lot of servers, but I do really like the VMware Workstation product for software testing and Linux-based development on a Windows workstation. I'm aware that VMware provides a lot of tools that are practically essential for datacenter virtualization. That said, when the Windows 8 Developer Preview shipped, I was surprised to learn that it wouldn't run on VMware -- only VirtualBox. For all VMware's strengths, VirtualBox seems to do a better job of its core function: virtualization. I'd hardly compare that to the difference between GIMP and Photoshop.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  13. file sizes by HeyBob! · · Score: 3, Informative

    This has been helpful (showing who/what is hogging disk space)
    Windirstat
    http://windirstat.info/

  14. Re:My Picks by Sigma+7 · · Score: 2

    Your sysadmin can decrypt your bitlocker?

    Yes.

    Remember that it's an enterprise deployment of BitLocker. This differs from a personal deployment, where the company may sometimes need access to an encrypted computer if the person originally using it was hit by a bus.

  15. Re:I hate InfoWorld by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 2

    MS does license MSE for installation on their compatible server products, and the installer works without problems. They changed the terms almost a year ago with the release of MSE 2.