PETA To Launch Pornography Website

The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals are planning on launching an adult oriented website to help protect animals through a mix of animal suffering footage and porn. I'm not sure how mixing the two will win hearts, minds, or naughty bits, but Lindsay Rajt, PETA's associate director of campaigns, seems to think it's a good idea. She says, "We're hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site."

Comments

/b

[Anonymous Coward]

So PETA is creating /b in other words.

Immoral Dilemma

[Anonymous Coward]

Nothing like humiliating women for the ethical treatment of animals.

Re:Immoral Dilemma

[characterZer0]

That aside, it's a silly prudish notion to think that pornography is any more or less humiliating than any other performance art.

Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in the local theater's production of Hamlet?

Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in a porn flick?

Yes obviously it's stupid, that's the point

[LighterShadeOfBlack]

Of course this is ridiculously idiotic. That's just what they're going for. Say something batshit insane that'll provoke media coverage and public reaction to show people that PETA still exists and believes in ending the suffering of animals or whatever. They have no intention of actually doing this, it's just another cynical attention-grabbing statement to remind people about PETA.

Nothing to see here, just Slashdot getting trolled.

Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before

[CelticWhisper]

Not to mention all the leg-humping dogs who would be up on sexual assault charges.

No dude - this is a PETA article, not a TSA article.

This is gonna backfire

[msobkow]

I've no doubt there are some sick, twisted people out there who are gonna get off on the animal cruelty pics. :(

Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before

[neoform]

Nah, they've been full-on for a long time... I realized this when they released a film called "Chickens are people too". The obvious reply to that title is: "No, they aren't."

You have to know the real psychology of PETA

[Quila]

They don't love animals, they just hate people.

Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before

[jythie]

Euthanize? Try eradicate... part of PETA's mission is the complete destruction of species that have made the mistake of getting along with humans.

Re:Hustler did this

[Cruciform]

You bring in your audience with the product they want, and while they're there you give them the message.
It's not exactly "new".

Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before

[increment1]

One can only hope that too much exposure doesn't result in people becoming sexually aroused by cruelty to animals. I really think that PETA should have thought this through a little bit more.

Re:Maybe PETA will be taping its internal operatio

[shutdown -p now]

how even blowing up a facility in order to free animals being tested on counts as Terrorism(tm) if you're not targeting people.

Terrorism doesn't have to target people by direct violence. So long as the intent is to force others into accepting some political or ideological point through fear (whether of violence against them, or destruction against their property), and it is practiced systematically, it is terrorism.