Slashdot Mirror


Augmented Reality's Disruptive Potential

pbahra writes "A company called Layar, based in Amsterdam, is working on products that take augmented reality in a slightly different direction. They provide a platform that allows anyone to build an AR app. Consider these ideas: you can use your mobile phone's camera to view the world; your phone knows where you are and what you are looking at. The implications are profound. One of the most interesting apps that someone produced was a virtual tee-shirt shop. It was placed in the 20 most expensive shopping streets in the world, selling t-shirts. Stop and think about that for a minute. He built a virtual shop where a real one already existed. His shop was accessible via a mobile phone, while the real one was accessible through, well, being real. Real space and its virtual overlay are being used by different people. There will be lawyers."

126 comments

  1. Same space, different market? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    Ok, let's think about this for a second. The guy chose the 20 most expensive shopping areas in the world to overlay his virtual t-shirt shop. Something tells me his shop is going to be selling a much different type of product, aimed at a much different clientele. If you are walking down Savile Row doing some shopping, you are probably not going to be looking for t-shirts, and you probably already have an idea of which shop you are going to go to, and where it is. This won't be a problem until it prevents you from seeing the actual, physical store. Even if the technology advances to the point where you can have augmented reality projected onto glasses or contact lenses, you can still see the real shop by taking off the glasses/removing contacts/switching off the display. To me, this story is a non-issue.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Same space, different market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So one person pays for the physical space in a high-profile location, the other guy just pretends to be there and gets the location for free.

      Is this fair?

    2. Re:Same space, different market? by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      But what about regular virtual stores in shopping malls? You have Hardware Store Inc, but a virtual Hardware.Com exists inside the mall as well.

      Though, I fail to see anyone actually going to a mall, whipping out their phone, and look for stores. That seems much more tedious than say, going to the paper map.

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    3. Re:Same space, different market? by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      when you put it that way, it sounds just like pop-up spam.

      i'm sure that as soon as someone invents an ad-blocker extension for AR, we'll be fine.

    4. Re:Same space, different market? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I doubt they'd do that. But one might scan the barcode and see if one can get the item cheaper elsewhere. In practice, unless it's substantially cheaper it's probably best to just buy it from the store you're in, rather than driving elsewhere or ordering it online.

      Also. WTF is up with the page and all those strange points.

    5. Re:Same space, different market? by macshit · · Score: 2

      So one person pays for the physical space in a high-profile location, the other guy just pretends to be there and gets the location for free.

      Is this fair?

      But he doesn't really "get the location," he "gets" a shoddy half-assed and barely usable cellphone gimmick. It's not going to impact the real shop one iota (so no loss on their part), and the t-shirt guy isn't actually going to get any significant number of customers by doing this — nobody's going to travel to physical location just to get a shoddy cellphone app experience, so any kind of physical location linkage is quickly going to be discarded.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    6. Re:Same space, different market? by toQDuj · · Score: 1

      They should extend it so it blocks real-life ads as well. Would be a godsend in ad-ridden Japan.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    7. Re:Same space, different market? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      If I hold up my smart phone in front of my face while I'm facing someone's shop, with Amazon loaded on the browser, is that fair?

      This is a stupid story about a silly publicity stunt.

    8. Re:Same space, different market? by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

      Stop talking about AR as if it was ubiquitous as the WWW. There is a handful of AR apps that don't interact with each-other, just don't use the ad-ridden ones.

    9. Re:Same space, different market? by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      ... nobody's going to travel to physical location just to get a shoddy cellphone app experience ...

      Ohhhhh... they will! they will and in doing so will also become clients of the Physical shop. Regardless if they like the virtual one or not they will become clients. It's a well known conversion mechanism. You get them to ${location} they convert into whoever naturally roams ${location}.

      --
      -- no sig today
    10. Re:Same space, different market? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      He gets the location for free only in relation to shoppers who have very specifically decided to view the location through the AR system, who can therefore be said to have invited him to show them his wares.

      It is analogous to taking advantage of an established retailer's B&M store or informative and therefore expensive website to do product research, and then purchasing from the most discounted seller you can find.

      The customer has made the choice. Unless the customer realizes they are driving prices, and therefore the ability of retailers to offer such B&M stores or informative websites, downward, and CARES that they are doing so, it doesn't really matter if it is fair. It's already happening in these other ways.

      It will probably then become the problem of goods manufacturers to support this customer information gathering, since it will be unsustainable for retailers to continue to do it meaningfully.

      Then retail real estate values will decline.

    11. Re:Same space, different market? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      its a feature test / school project thing think of it as a sideways method of commenting (btw can we get an MASTER OFF for this since it does get a bit old and gives some browser/platform combos fits)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  2. Retailers are shaking in their boots by ratnerstar · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... Because I know when I walk down the Champs-Elysees in Paris, what I really want to be doing is looking at the world through the screen of my smartphone! Why hasn't anyone thought of this before?

    Even better: sell t-shirts that appear blank but display hipster slogans when viewed through an AR app.

    --
    Just because you sold your soul to the devil that needn't make you a teetotaler. --The Devil and Daniel Webster
    1. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG that's genius. Make it. I will pay you money for it. Other people will do.

    2. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      ... Because I know when I walk down the Champs-Elysees in Paris, what I really want to be doing is looking at the world through the screen of my smartphone! Why hasn't anyone thought of this before?

      I assume you're being sarcastic, but as an American who has spent a significant time living in touristy European cities (while doing research), I've had the opportunity to observe lots of people wandering around bumping into things because they're too busy looking through their videocamera or taking photos to notice anything actually going on... Even in the most beautiful or culturally significant places in the world.

      The kind of person likely to buy a tee shirt in such a location is probably exactly the kind of person who will be wondering around viewing everything through a smart phone (perhaps running an AR app to translate street signs or who knows what else...)

    3. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is an excellent SciFi book called The Prefect, by Alastair Reynolds where something like this plays a key role, but in an even grander scale. People chose what they want to look like in augmented reality, and most everyone have implants that pick this up and automatically route the image into their brain without having to look elsewhere like a smart phone screen (at least that is how I read it). People could walk around looking like they had horns, or were fauns or satyrs, etc. The lead character(s) who were a form of police had to wear special glasses since they could not afford to have artificial implants in their brain that could be hacked. But the augmented reality also hooked everyone in the society together (in ten thousand habitats orbiting a planet around a distant star from earth). It was an interesting take on how technology might impact reality in the future. Anyways, FWIW Reynolds writes some interesting stuff.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    4. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by Bangz · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it's surely not long* before augmented reality is a little more transparent than staring at your phone. * Not long as in, erm, a decade or two :) depends how transparent you want this stuff.

    5. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      The Golden Age trilogy by John C. Wright is another very detailed exploration of the implications of this kind of technology taken to its logical conclusion. In that novel, everything you sense is augmented in one way or another. Real-life ads are blocked and made to appear like natural parts of the scenery. Your house can be any kind of dwelling you desire, the people around you can look like anything at all. AR has many interesting possibilities but I don't think it will truly be much more than novelty until it breaks out of the 4 inch screen and at the very least is overlayed on some glasses or possibly projected directly on the retina.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    6. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      the people around you can look like anything at all

      LOL, we already do that with ugly women via beer goggles.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    7. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You can buy "HUD glasses" today, and Japanese are experimenting with an ultra-small projector that you can stick on any random pair of eyeglasses.

    8. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by ooloogi · · Score: 1

      What if you can point your smatphone at the t-shirt you like, and it identifies an online merchant selling it direct out of China for 1/10th the price, shipped to your home? No worries haggling with French salespeople, no having to carry it around for the rest of the day, and no bloated luggage. Maybe with a licensing deal, the brick and mortar store could even get a cut out of it, and not have to worry so much about inventory.

    9. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      As a furry, I approve of this idea.

      I imagine there would be a 'naked patch' in circulation that just deletes all clothing from view too.

    10. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      ... and then wonder when you get home why you just got laid off and why they are shipping your job to China.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    11. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better: sell t-shirts that appear blank but display hipster slogans when viewed through an AR app.

      You are brilliant. Might I suggest "Bitches don't know about my AR T."

    12. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      what I really want to be doing is looking at the world through the screen of my smartphone!

      You obviously haven't been out of your mother's basement in some time because if you were to go to any major city, let's say New York for shits and giggles, all you see are people with their heads down, looking at the screens of their smartphones.

      I recently took some foreign relatives of my aunt on a tour of New York and one of them commented on all the people who were glued to their smartphones.

      So yes, there will be people who will walk down the Champs-Elysees looking at their smartphone.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    13. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Rainbow's end was a recent Hugo best novel that used augmented reality as a very big plot point. Basically content lenses with micro body movements for input was the new norm. I particularly liked that one of the most popular reality overlays was a discworld based mythology. Good book, worthy of the Hugo. I could see contacts being able to do this, leave the brain surgery out of this!.

    14. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, LOLAR writing about AR.

    15. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * s/LOLAR/LOL...AR/

      Such an epic fail...

    16. Re:Retailers are shaking in their boots by miahmiah · · Score: 1

      If you're worried about looking stupid, why would you post that comment... Automatic bigot label applied! Really, it's almost 2012 and you aren't OK with sexual variety or discussions of sexual subjects?

  3. Fascinating by eggstasy · · Score: 1

    This will be huge. People all over the world are going to walk around and perpetually stare into their phones to view a projection of reality instead of reality itself. Plato would be proud.

    1. Re:Fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you seen the real world lately? People ARE walking around perpetually staring into their phones.

    2. Re:Fascinating by tunabomber · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they're looking at text messages, facebook, email etc. An AR app will have to fight those things for a person's attention.

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    3. Re:Fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm, so this could make a volcano or the Grand Canyon look like a field of flowers? That should be great for people that find cars with GPS too cumbersome for doing Darwin's work.

    4. Re:Fascinating by Ambvai · · Score: 1

      There's an app for that.
      Type n Walk is a new iPhone app that lets you see what's in front of you while typing and walking.

  4. Why AR is used? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only location or QR code can get the job done? Or a product search can also do the jobs.

    Open is just another tactic for bureaucratism

  5. LEGAL NOTICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hearby claim all revenues from any and all commercial enterprises occupying any overlaying location, coordinates or appearance of my properties including but not limited to all shops on Parallel Earth, Alternate Earth, Mirror World, and Bizzaro Earth. All payment must be converted to USD. Bizzaro dollars will not be accepted as payment for debts.

  6. On the flip side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lawyers find their clients no longer require rosters outside court houses or on each court room door, as the system now recognizes NRA-inside.

  7. God damn spam bullshit by oldhack · · Score: 0

    This is not the drunken 1990s. You slashdot hacks, I presume, have been around. Can't you exercise bit of your brain cells?

    Stop with the hype spam bullshit.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  8. read the book by hguorbray · · Score: 3, Informative

    see Halting State by Charles Stross and Spook Country by William Gibson for examples of how this overlay technology might work/look/feel like

    both books are pretty good reads and the VR overlay is central to the Stross book and a fairly big plot point in the Gibson book. Also recommend Stross's 'The Laundry Files' series -where IT and Necromancy collide....

    -I'm just sayin

    1. Re:read the book by bughunter · · Score: 2

      An even better example, more pertinent to TFA, would be Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge.

      Some selective quotes from the linked Wiki page:

      In the novel, augmented reality is dominant, with humans interacting with virtual overlays of reality almost all of the time. This is accomplished by wearing smart clothing and contact lenses that can overlay and replace what the eye would normally see with computer graphics, using advanced virtual retinal display (VRD) technology.

      There are many realities to choose from in the novel; however, the largest and more robust of them are built by large user bases in the manner of a wiki or Second Life, including worlds based on authors such as H. P. Lovecraft, Terry Pratchett, and the merged fictional universes of Steven Spielberg and J. K. Rowling.

      In other words, people walk around in a fantasy world of their own choosing, and tend to associate only with those people subscribing to the same fantasy. Disruptive, indeed, but an effect that doesn't necessarily require technology to achieve...as recent non-fictional events have demonstrated.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    2. Re:read the book by trk6640 · · Score: 1

      Check out Daemon by Daniel Suarez for a fantastic fictional story using current feasible technology, the focus being on an augmented reality network. http://thedaemon.com/

    3. Re:read the book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be prepared though, Stross has wonderful ideas. Beautiful ideas well worth exploring. However... he is simply not a very good writer. All of his characters always go through the same arcs and extremely similar thought processes. As Neal Stephenson said, Sci Fi is idea porn. Stross is idea porn with the production quality to match.

    4. Re:read the book by jpwilliams · · Score: 1

      Also see Counting Heads by Marusek. Not the main point of the story, but everyone has a visor with different filters that allow them to view different info. Even more interesting is that certain inside environments need no visor ... images simply appear in the space, allowing for people to be there "holographically" in the room. The line's between actually being somewhere and being there virtually become blurred, with the latter becoming way more popular.

    5. Re:read the book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think 'The Golden Age' by John C.Wright

      It's actually influenced a lot of my thoughts in what features you'd want in VR - e.g. in the case above alternate world views, layering of realities and even spam filtering.

    6. Re:read the book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will need to look into Vernor Vinge's work. Does he explore the parallelism between living in a virtual reality and deeply held religious beliefs? Do his words shed any light on the suicide bombers?

    7. Re:read the book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pattern Recognition by Gibson, the first in that trilogy, features AR much more prominently than Spook Country

    8. Re:read the book by jnpcl · · Score: 2

      There's also an anime called Denno Coil that takes place in a world with AR glasses.

      However, they're mostly used by kids and techie geeks. It's not seen as a "big thing" to the adult populace.

  9. PORN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    porn. everywhere. and dicks too.

  10. Tried it by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The implications are profound.

    No, not really. Unless, maybe, you're Geordi LaForge.

    Stop and think about that for a minute. He built a virtual shop where a real one already existed.

    Big deal. I've already been able to walk into Sears and shop at JCPenney.com on my phone, if I chose, for the past several years. What this guy has done is basically artificially limit his online store's reach.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Tried it by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Big deal. I've already been able to walk into Sears and shop at JCPenney.com on my phone, if I chose, for the past several years..

      Now imagine if you could only visit JCPenny.com ONLY if you WALK into Sears... Ok, I'm AT the expensive Tshirt, where I can buy a tshirt and walk out of the door with it. WHY would I want to then go to a "virtual" tshirt job, buy a shirt, and then wait for days for it to show up?

      Yes Augmented Reality is profound. There are some pretty cool things you can do with it. Building a "virtual shop where a real one already exists." Is probably the least cool.

      Sure there will be lawyers. When people come out with the 'nudity' app that paints an image of a naked girl whenever you a particular person... But I'm pretty sure it isn't anything that slander and libel lawyers don't already deal with today.

    2. Re:Tried it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The implications are profound.

      No, not really. Unless, maybe, you're Geordi LaForge.

      Yes! AR makes a cool gimmick and you could build cool games around it but on the other hand, it's fairly useless if you don't have a display device you can wear all the time. Some glasses, some contacts, something fancy and futuristic even by today's standards. Sure, video glasses exist, but all of them are ugly and none of the high-res ones are even vaguely affordable. Virtually none of them have mounted cameras so you need to add a rangefinder to calculate parallax.

      Where is my cheap eyetap? You could build one for a thousand dollars years ago, supposedly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Tried it by dredwerker · · Score: 1

      The implications are profound.

      No, not really. Unless, maybe, you're Geordi LaForge.

      Yes! AR makes a cool gimmick and you could build cool games around it but on the other hand, it's fairly useless if you don't have a display device you can wear all the time. Some glasses, some contacts, something fancy and futuristic even by today's standards. Sure, video glasses exist, but all of them are ugly and none of the high-res ones are even vaguely affordable. Virtually none of them have mounted cameras so you need to add a rangefinder to calculate parallax.

      Where is my cheap eyetap? You could build one for a thousand dollars years ago, supposedly.

      Here: http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/female-artist-wants-bionic-eye-goes-kickstarter-14-07-2011/

      --
      On a long enough timeline. The survival rate for everyone drops to zero. Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club, 1996
    4. Re:Tried it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Where is my cheap eyetap? You could build one for a thousand dollars years ago, supposedly.

      Here: http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/female-artist-wants-bionic-eye-goes-kickstarter-14-07-2011/

      Why don't you make sure you understand a word before you try to respond to a sentence that contains it?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only will there be lawyers, but there will also be virtual lawyers. However do not worry too much about that. They will be virtually indistinguishable the one from the other.

      To clarify, I do not mean to imply that lawyers are from a reality of lesser dimensions than that which scientists, engineers, and technologists inhabit. IANAL so I do not know. What I do know is that lawyers work in a virtual world of laws, regulations, and precedents that has been diverging from the real world for several hundred years.

      The optimist says the glass is half full, the pessimist says it is half empty. The engineer says the glass is twice as big as it needs to be and the technologist concerns himself with replacing the glass with one of a more appropriate size. The lawyer? He mutters quietly "There must be a way to monetize all this disagreement..."

    6. Re:Tried it by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      So I walked into an office depot the other day. I wanted to buy a USB extension cable. I looked on the shelf and the price was high for a short cable. I grabbed something else I needed and ordered the cable from newegg on my phone while I waited in the check out line.

      Tools like Amazon's UPC scanner are greatly helpful. Google goggles as well. As OP said though, unless you're LaForge, the ARoverlay is more cumbersome than it's worth.

      --
      I do security
  11. 2009 called by atari2600a · · Score: 1

    They want their app back.

    1. Re:2009 called by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      That's funny coming from someone named after a game system from the 70's.

    2. Re:2009 called by atari2600a · · Score: 1

      The name actually means Checkmate, 2600Hz, A-grade :P

  12. Re:Terrible summary by lee1 · · Score: 1

    The original article is pretty incoherent, too. And the 'summary' is a clumsy and shameless attempt to plagiarise it.

  13. Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole point of the virtual world is to be free from physical location. Physical retailers should be afraid of, oh I dunno, Blizzard opening a mall inside of WoW where physical goods can be purchased. Or a second life that doesn't suck.

  14. Based in Amsterdam? by PPH · · Score: 1

    And all they could think of was an AR display of tee-shirt shops?

    Oh come on now....

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Based in Amsterdam? by rve · · Score: 1

      The real Amsterdam doesn't live up to the reputation you're referring to. It's a small, sleepy town, about the size of Columbus, OH, and still not quite ready to move into the 21st century.

      Almost nothing is open before 8.30 am, and most stores close after 6 pm and in the weekends. It's only been about a year since stores have been legally allowed to open on Sundays. The local culture is somewhat cold and unrefined by our standards. Having fun is generally seen as a queer and unnecessary thing foreigners like to do.

      The notorious red lights district is not any wilder than what you would find in any major city (though perhaps a bit less tasteful) and rather filthy. A great place to meet pickpockets and panhandlers, nothing more.

    2. Re:Based in Amsterdam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real Amsterdam doesn't live up to the reputation you're referring to. It's a small, sleepy town, about the size of Columbus, OH, and still not quite ready to move into the 21st century.

      .

      It's a small town about the size of the second-largest city in Ohio, one that houses the third-largest university in America?

  15. Bad Example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem with this story is the fact that the example given is so bad that it misrepresents the potential disruption.

    Better example: Disruptive app that allows me to be standing in a store and view items on the shelf through my phone with competing prices from nearby stores or online displayed in the air next to them.

    Yes, you can do that currently by typing and searching yourself, but this would allow it to be MUCH easier. Now that we have a better possibility, discuss.....

    1. Re:Bad Example by I)_MaLaClYpSe_(I · · Score: 1

      Please Mod Parent up!

    2. Re:Bad Example by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      You can do this already with Android phones, using the bar code scanner. Maybe not getting as much press, it's a more down-to-earth method, yet it works already.

      I've tried this myself once with some DVDs that I got second hand. Scanned the bar code with product number, and within seconds had a list of some online shops selling that product, with prices. You can do the same when you're in a shop of course (all you need is a mobile data connection).

      Layar is interesting but has many more uses of course. For example there is a Wikipedia layer, which will give e.g. overlays of major buildings and provide instant information of what you're looking at. Works basically with any entry in WP that has coordinates with it. A major issue holding back Layar is that it uses a lot of data (still expensive - and some people, like me, don't even have a data plan), and as it uses network, GPS, compass, camera and screen all big time, plus putting a serious load on the phone's processor, it drains your battery really fast.

    3. Re:Bad Example by darrylo · · Score: 1

      It's already been done. As others have said, apps exist for iOS and android that'll scan a barcode and display nearby and online prices. There's also at least one app that'll do this based upon a phone camera shot (and not just a barcode), but it's a bit hit-and-miss.

    4. Re:Bad Example by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      There are already apps that let you scan barcodes and look up prices. It's not disruptive. Nobody cares. Except maybe the store owner, but if he cares it's because he's trying to get away with charging you more.

    5. Re:Bad Example by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

      Or a non-commercial example:

      Going to a controversial historical site (Jerusalem or maybe some sites in India) and having you phone overlay totally different historical facts on the ruins in front of you than the tour guide, who is rehashing the local, nationalized interpretation.

      --

      ---
      "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    6. Re:Bad Example by ludwigf · · Score: 1

      Better example: Disruptive app that allows me to be standing in a store and view items on the shelf through my phone with competing prices from nearby stores or online displayed in the air next to them.

      Think about it. In theoretical economy transparency is a condition for the market to function. So this is how it is supposed be, right?

    7. Re:Bad Example by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

      Here is another take: you put up (virtual) anti-homophobia posters on the walls of the Vatican, or, you setup a (virtual) gallery of banned artworks before prominent government buildings in China.

  16. Re:A thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just. testing..something...with... . . . ....this new .... "feature" ... ... . . ....

  17. That's nothing. by Sasayaki · · Score: 1

    I wait until we can project information directly onto the retina, or even push it directly to the optic nerve or the brain itself.

    You could get real-time subtitles for the person you're talking to. Their name would float above their head so there's no embarrassed fumbling as you try and remember who they are.

    You could even have a small note beside them; "Last met at Jake's party 10/10/2009".

    You could turn ANY FLAT SURFACE into a computer monitor by holding out your fingers to make a box where it should go. Make a different sign for "make a keyboard here", then type away.

    You could also "airbrush out" advertising and unwanted images ("I'm a Fundie so I never want to see a nipple ever again!").

    You could ask for directions and get an arrow. Couple the system with tiny cameras arranged, say, on your hat, and you could give yourself full 360 degree vision, or visual warnings ("CAUTION: CAR APPROACHING LEFT", etc).

    You could take a picture by blinking twice.

    You could zoom in.

    You could make T-shirts that had a barcode on them instead of an image. The barcode gets read, and then the device projects something else over the top. If you're a metal fan, it says "SLAYER". If you're a Christian, it has a picture of Jesus. Etc.

    And all that's off the top of my head. The possibilities are endless.

    --
    Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
    1. Re:That's nothing. by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      If you can do all that, why would you ever need to type?

      And I'd be really curious what would happen to our brain if we'd get direct 360 vision implanted into our optical nerve. Fun times should abound.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:That's nothing. by jezwel · · Score: 1
      you might want to apply for some patents of these!

      They are like those patents that were updated for "using a computer". Yours could be "in augmented/virtual reality".

    3. Re:That's nothing. by Ambvai · · Score: 1

      Really, really nauseated.

      It'd take a bit to get used to it; it's quite different from the experiment about flipping vision around with mirrors since that dealt with the same amount of data in a fashion that was mostly similar. A quick look around online suggests that the human field of vision is approximately 150 degrees laterally and 120 degrees vertically. Full "spherical" vision would result in something like... 7 times more stimulation or so. Without mental restructuring, you'd probably develop some psychoses from trying divide your attention up so much.

    4. Re:That's nothing. by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      What's a party?

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  18. There can only be one! by quiet+down · · Score: 2

    The reason physical space has any value at all is that there is only ONE of that given space. If / When AR becomes a thing that actually matters, there is zero chance that only one AR 'space' within a physical space exists, making it meaningless if someone took your physical space and used it for whatever they wanted to in AR. No single entity will hold a monopoly over AR 'space'. There would be all sorts of varieties, such as MS, Apple, Starbucks, TPB, you name it. As soon as that 'space' is available to anyone who gives enough of a shit to set up something in an AR, all value it may have held is lost forever.

  19. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the only way to buy T-Shirts from the store is to go to the physical store, with the bonus of being able to whip out your mobile device and being able to buy online from the store while you're already at the store but you have to point your phone at the product or store. It's like the 60's thought up the Internet.

    How about some actual innovative ideas? Are you a big fat fatty? Maybe it can send you on a tour of town while you work off your cheeto gut. How about transparent wearable displays with built in camera so you can see AR all the time instead of through a tiny window that you have to hold in front of your face? Maybe people can share their personal information on some AR-enabled social network/networks, and you can see the information when you look at them.

    The only thing these morons could think up is taking a physical object and making it virtual, bravo, maybe soon you'll think up a way to replace the square wheels on my car with round ones.

  20. Obligatory... by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I, for one, welcome our Laughing-Man overlords.

  21. Underground Services. btw I patent it first! by labnet · · Score: 2

    A great app for augmented reailty would be underground service location.

    Millions of people are digging up streets every day. If you could map all the underground services like sewer, water, electrical, data, storm water, you could use your iphone type device to 'look into' the ground before you begin excavation.
    Obviously limited by the accuracy of the existing mapping data.

    --
    46137
    1. Re:Underground Services. btw I patent it first! by jezwel · · Score: 1
      sotty labnet, this is already an iPhone app (though I don't think it's been released outside the enterprrise) that one of my local electrical companies was writing/using. Point your phone at the ground and see the services in their currently known locations.

      They were using laser scanning for above ground items at 5cm resolution for the mapping, not sure how they intended to check the underground services though...

    2. Re:Underground Services. btw I patent it first! by labnet · · Score: 1

      sorry labnet, this is already an iPhone app

      Damn... back to the batcave.....

      --
      46137
    3. Re:Underground Services. btw I patent it first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here's why that one, though highly useful, probably isn't getting made:
      Ooooh, look, a gas main in a heavily populated area

    4. Re:Underground Services. btw I patent it first! by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Uhm, as opposed to the GIANT YELLOW SIGNS AND MARKERS that are posted all along it?

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    5. Re:Underground Services. btw I patent it first! by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 2

      Already done and buried here in NY. It was a nice concept, but the base maps are wrong, the GPS isn't accurate enough, the compasses are totally crap (go play with a star map AR viewer some time), the facility maps are wrong anyway, and the facility depths are always changing with erosion and landscaping.

      An excavator is typically required to hand-dig / vacuum excavate within 24 inches of a marking, and will use a backhoe right up to that point. Considering the stacked errors and different mapping accuracies and coordinate systems involved... you'll be lucky to get 5 meter accuracy on your best day. And then there's the large quantity of plastic pipe that's been buried with no tracer wire. Nobody knows where that crap is, nor will they find it without GPR. Same with drainage, sewer and culverts, CATV drops - none of that stuff is typically mapped.

      People often mistake how inaccurate GIS systems are, and don't understand the implications of that inaccuracy. They see it used for 911 and fire trucks and whatever, but GIS in the Facility Location World is not the same as 911 routing. 911 does NOT use the map to decide IF an ambulance will be dispatched - it merely decides WHICH. Make sure you read and understand that statement - while totally obvious, many people don't get it. Especially the map providers.
      More, the ambulance does NOT go home if it reaches the exact long-lat of the call and finds nothing. The ambulance will help the screaming people who are one inch outside the perimeter of where they claimed they'd be. In that sense, 911 GIS does not require any more accuracy than Pizza Delivery - and Pizza Delivery Accuracy is exactly what most maps have.

      Facility location is different. If the geo lookup says there's no facility under the exact dirt you're referencing, then no utilities are sent to mark anything. The device you've proposed is asking a very simple question - "can I drive this bucket five feet into the dirt, HERE, yes or no." That question can tolerate about six inches of total error on a good day. Wrong? You're dead.

      This may sound silly from a myopic "google maps" perspective - but in places with no landmarks, or with callers who have no idea where they are, or facility owners with no clue where their stuff is (water companies, DPWs, sewer, etc) - facility location stops being about where the facilities are. Facility location becomes a process of proving where the facilities are NOT. In that sense, the 811 centers must hedge the facility location data with every place a person might say they are, when they're actually somewhere else. "We're a half mile from the intersection". Yeah, sure you are. "We're digging on the right side of the street." Uh, seriously, NSEW? "Ok, and which direction are you facing when you say that?" "Oh, I'm facing the left side." Facility mapping is little better - "water line runs 1500 feet along river edge and turns right at oak tree.", circa 1966. "Chart shows the gas line under the lawn, so replacing the sidewalk should be clear." "You know they widened the road two years ago, right?"

      That is the general case that must be covered on every single call. And as I said, AR is a neat concept that does not cover it - the base maps are wrong, the GPS does not have the six inch accuracy needed, the stupid "compass" sensor can't truly figure out which way you're actually facing most of the time, and the facility maps either don't exist, are wrong, or are relative to a different coord system and accuracy. The result would be an anecdotal curiosity, at best. No reasonable person would actually base a LIFE SAFETY decision upon it. About the closest you can get to such a thing is the head-tracking system on a directional bore - and even that takes a magician to make work, and that's with active sensing.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    6. Re:Underground Services. btw I patent it first! by labnet · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the detailed reply. I agree with most of your points. but..

      In Australia, the surveying is usually pretty good, at least in the cities. This is mainly because historically the government was responsible for most underground services, not lazy private contractors like in the states. (That has changed now of course)
      Like all things, the tech will improve, maps will get better, and maybe in 20 years it becomes a usefull tool.

      --
      46137
  22. Not thinking it through, are we? by khasim · · Score: 1

    Who cares about store fronts?

    Instead, project your WoW avatar onto yourself. Increase your dating potential.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmVSQ2DrBUo

    1. Re:Not thinking it through, are we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill your dating potential.

      FTFY

    2. Re:Not thinking it through, are we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Increase your killing power.

      FTFTFY.

  23. Re:A thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like you're the one who wants to be the Thought Police.

  24. Lame "augmented reality" by Animats · · Score: 1

    Virtual billboards. A rather lame application of augmented reality, neither original or impressive.

    There are far more interesting things one might do. Show the area as it existed at some time in the past. Show the tracks of all taxis and buses that have passed through. Show who owns each building, and its sales history. Color restaurants based on their inspection reports or reviews. Show locations of crimes in the area.

    Or even show social stuff. Figure out who the cool people are from their Facebook links, and show the coolness of areas of a city from their tracking data. Show which businesses have negative feedback. Do something useful.

    But no. All we get are ads.

    Computing has become a branch of the advertising industry. It's discouraging. When IBM and Microsoft were on top, they were somewhat annoying monopolies. But at least they sold products to end users. Now, the end user is the product. The customers of Google and Facebook are their advertisers, not their end users.

    1. Re:Lame "augmented reality" by darrylo · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly. This kind of "augmented reality" will turn into nothing more than "augmented advertising". Seriously, do people not understand that the only purpose for this is "advertising"? Like I really want more spam in my life ....

      And, yes, if I'm looking for a deal on a particular item, there are much easier, quicker, and less-in-your-face methods for finding deals.

    2. Re:Lame "augmented reality" by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

      As long as they are Open or Free systems you'll be able to create ARAdBlock... Just boycott any non Open and tell your friends and family to do the same.

    3. Re:Lame "augmented reality" by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      No, VBBs will never eclipse my concept of real life "Pop-up Billboards" on interstates and highways. Well, once we figure out the whole "windshield replacement" thing.

      > Show the area as it existed at some time in the past

      This: http://www.mymodernmet.com/profiles/blogs/the-ghosts-of-world-war-iis

      Utterly fantastic, and terrifying in some cases.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  25. Re:WTF? by Wolfling1 · · Score: 1

    Fascinating to see how quickly someone attacked it. And with such a base dialog.

    Gotta wonder what drives people to such infantile behaviour. Child abuse maybe? I couldn't imagine engaging with this person in real life without thinking 'Sheesh. This guy has some seriously faulty wiring'.

    Here's hoping that /. has some IP tracking and can filter it out fairly quickly.

  26. Agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is only profound to people who haven't grasped modern technology yet.

  27. OMG by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    They're right about one thing... You can't make an app that works on MY property. These are MY GPS coordinates, you can't trigger shit on them.... Oh man, somebody patent suing people over that so it can't happen.

  28. There will be lawyers by hoggoth · · Score: 0

    "There will be lawyers"

    There always are...
    Like bacteria, you can assume they will always be probing every orifice looking for a way to disrupt you.

    I'd like one of those glow-lights that reveal the presence of bacteria and make people exclaim in disgust, "Ewww! They're all over everything! They're all over ME!"... except this glow-light reveals the presence of lawyers and the friction and cost they introduce into everything we do, "Ewww! There is litigation all over everything! It's chilling effect is all over ME!"...

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  29. Re:A thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And to all you bleeding hearts out there: you don't honestly think that that sick, disgusting shit is okay do you?

    Ah, what a great argument, that if we disagree that people should be jailed and killed for outputting their desires in a way that doesn't harm anyone, we're championing the acts themselves, or somehow partaking or approving of them, which makes us as bad as the perpetrators in your eyes. Newsflash: People will like what you don't like, you'll never stop them. As long as it doesn't hurt others, what's the harm? You may not be into fisting little girls, but if someone was, and instead of fisting little girls, they played videogames to relieve their needs, why do you feel the need to stomp on other's freedoms? These are the same type of disingenuous turn-around that bought-out Politicians did with the internet monitoring bill. "If you're against this bill, you like CHILD RAPISTS, OOOOH~"

  30. Says who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real space and its virtual overlay are being used by different people. There will be lawyers.

    Not in my app there won't!!

  31. Still waiting for 3D by Phurge · · Score: 1

    see http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=btaG034fJgg

    oh and hoverboards would be cool too.

    --
    I'll see your hokum and raise you a boondoggle.
  32. Re:WTF? by thunderclap · · Score: 1

    you are on the wrong page.

  33. Lawyers is all you can think of? Think *layers* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honey, I'm done remodeling. Bring your phone and have a look. Don't tell your friends just yet. It'll be a surprise when they come this weekend.

  34. Yo dawg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard you like shopping. So I put a virtual store inside your physical store so you can drive across town to mail order crap.

  35. Off. Now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You! Yes you. The space you currently occupy coincides with my virtual augmented lawn. Get off.

  36. No monopoly? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Just like there's no monopoly in search engines, digital music stores, desktop operating systems and all those? I'm sure Google will push their street view pretty hard and having an AR shop on "maps" will get you well over 50% of cell phone users. If you don't believe me, just substitute Google for the company you think will dominate this market.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  37. "There will be lawyers." by quax · · Score: 2

    Truer words were never posted.

    No high priced outfit will allow such cyber squatting of their realty.

    They will unleash hordes of lawyers to peel back the augmented reality layers.

  38. The funny thing is by dave1791 · · Score: 1

    Yes, being able to display a google earth layer over the camera on my phone would be cool. In theory. The problem with AR is that it combines cheap in-phone GPS results with low quality solid state compass data. I’ve got an app called “go sky watch”. It’s really cool in that it can show me where constellation, individual stars, elliptic line and the current locations of the sun and moon are. Too bad that more likely than not, it thinks my phone is pointed to a different part of the sky than it actually is. Wikitude suffers the same problem and is most useful in overhead map mode, where it is reduced to being a not as good as google maps, google maps clone.

    For the foreseeable future, AR is just going to be a gimmick that” will become the next big thing sometime soon”.

  39. Future developments by Hentes · · Score: 1

    Today AR is mostly just used for marketing but it might become more useful when Kinect-like devices can be miniaturized enough to fit into a phone thus allowing it to truly see and understand its surroundings.

  40. "There will be lawyers." by Hasai · · Score: 1

    Heh; that's like saying "there will be rain."
    Face it; anywhere there's the least bit of money, there will be lawyers sniffing about.

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

  41. Profound idea? No pointless. by MjDelves · · Score: 1

    Why bother making a "virtual" store that is only accessible at one physical location?? The whole point of the internet is that you can access it anywhere. Surely it makes more business sense to make barcode scanning app so that someone can walk into any store, scan the item that they are interested in and either be given a list of online stores to buy it from at a cheaper price or a list of recommended alternatives based upon their tastes?

  42. Not impressed, idiotic example given by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    I keep downloading and trying Layar, then promptly uninstalling it. It's kinda cluttered, unattractive, and generally useless unless you are walking around Manhattan.

    And the example they gave in the summary: "One of the most interesting apps that someone produced was a virtual tee-shirt shop"

    Ok, let me get this straight. Rather than going to stupidteeshirtidea.com and looking around, you download Layar, then you download the stupidteeshirtidea app listed in Layar, then you walk around until you find the stupidteeshirtidea virtual store and click it to get redirected to stupidteeshirtidea.com.

    THAT'S F'ING STUPID.

    --
    I8-D
    1. Re:Not impressed, idiotic example given by miahmiah · · Score: 1

      Ok, let me get this straight. Rather than going to stupidteeshirtidea.com and looking around, you download Layar, then you download the stupidteeshirtidea app listed in Layar, then you walk around until you find the stupidteeshirtidea virtual store and click it to get redirected to stupidteeshirtidea.com.

      THAT'S F'ING STUPID.

      Hahahaha perfectly worded!

  43. Discrepancy by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    TFS said:

    A company called Layar, based in Amsterdam, is working on products that take augmented reality in a slightly different direction. They provide a platform that allows anyone to build an AR app

    TFS meant to say:

    Check out my new product. It's great. I need publicity. Seriously, come now and get it. kthxbai

  44. Been there Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for a startup in the late 90's doing this. Back then it as iPaq's using wifi or cell cards and GPS. We would create geo points where info could be tagged so while you were walking down the street and passing a chinese shop you could see a virtual sticker that said "hey been here great food".

    That was 13-14 years ago, not new.

  45. The real Virtual Law challenge is by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    I would like to see an actual real world Law Firm setup shop in SL (must purchase a full sim). SL has all the fun of a WORLDWIDE location so it would have to be a MoFo level Firm but hey i think they would be the ONLY firm in SL.

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  46. or to say this shorter by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    you are lucky if the data available is within a METER and you need to be within a half foot.

    guess wrong and BOOM is in your future

    CALL BEFORE YOU DIG

    If those guys make an error they can fix it/ have the fixit guys on "Red Phone" speed dial

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  47. Cool If It's Bigger Than A Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this different in any non-graphical way from using your phone to buy something off of Amazon while standing in a real store?