Slashdot Mirror


FBI Arrests LulzSec and Anonymous Hackers

Velcroman1 writes "The FBI arrested two alleged members of the hacking collectives LulzSec and Anonymous on Thursday morning in San Francisco and Phoenix. Search warrants were also being executed in New Jersey, Minnesota and Montana, an FBI official told FoxNews.com. A document purported to come from the FBI leaked online earlier this month called these hacker groups a national security threat. One individual was described as part of the LulzSec group, the other belongs to the group that calls itself Anonymous, the official said. The suspected hacker arrested in California is homeless and alleged to have been involved in the hacking of Santa Cruz County government websites."

36 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi Dave!

  2. News Headlines For Tomorrow by Deaths+Proxy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tonight we get to hear from our security expert why the FBI website has gone down. More at six.

  3. Oh yes indeed.... by Stumbles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is nothing of greater threat to national security than a HOMELESS hacker. Though I guess it is good as any excuse to get such riff-raft off the curbs. Why just the other day I saw this homeless person and immediately thought; you know, that person is probably a real threat to my countries security and needs FBI involvement to justify their jailing.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
    1. Re:Oh yes indeed.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose.

    2. Re:Oh yes indeed.... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is nothing of greater threat to national security than a HOMELESS hacker. Though I guess it is good as any excuse to get such riff-raft off the curbs. Why just the other day I saw this homeless person and immediately thought; you know, that person is probably a real threat to my countries security and needs FBI involvement to justify their jailing.

      It's easier to go after the kiddies than to address the real threats, such as the Russian mafia or whoever is doing the stuff from China.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Oh yes indeed.... by devleopard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Despite the political rhetoric, you don't get arrested for your potential threat, you get arrested for an alleged crime. Pretty simple concept.

      If I spray-paint "My mom's a whore call here at 555-1212" on the side of your car, I broke the law. It doesn't matter if I'm homeless or not.

      --
      The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
    4. Re:Oh yes indeed.... by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      The suspected hacker is homeless and alleged to have been involved in Santa Cruz County government website cyberattacks...

      So, hacking county government websites is ok, just so long as you are homeless? Is that how it works?

      Or is your objection that county police werent involved in an internet crime?

    5. Re:Oh yes indeed.... by LordLimecat · · Score: 3

      False dichotomy alert. Lets stop going after shoplifters, hackers, and wife beaters, until we've taken care of the mafia, drug lords, and crazy dictators with nukes.

    6. Re:Oh yes indeed.... by westlake · · Score: 2

      There is nothing of greater threat to national security than a HOMELESS hacker.

      Homeless doesn't mean "unskilled." It may simply mean "unemployable." Morris County shelters see growing number of white-collar professionals becoming homeless

      But are we looking at deep poverty here or a cyberpunk fantasy?

      Feds: Homeless Computer Hacker Launched 'Anonymous' Attack Over Anti-Camping Law

      After 23 nights, an area near the county courthouse steps is filled with sleeping bags, coolers, food, books, backpacks and other personal belongings campers have brought with them.

      Homeless campers plead with Santa Cruz city leaders to change sleeping law

    7. Re:Oh yes indeed.... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As more and more Americans are forced into homelessness because of economic destruction initiated by their traitorous government, the authorities will rightly begin to equate being homeless with being disgruntled with the establishment.

      As it is, the homeless are often stalked and harassed by the cops(predators like to practice in between the real hunts) and even beaten and manslaughtered by the law or gangs of masked, steroid-addled MMA freaks.

      And surprise, surprise - Obama will pull the troops out of Iraq and place them in domestic security, prison, and law enforcement jobs, coincidentally the only jobs that will be left, just in time for the economic meltdown and popular revolt. The combat-hardened half of the population will be turned loose against the half with starving children and no roof over their heads.

      That's why true red-blooded Americans must fight on two fronts, with a laptop in one hand and a loaded gun in the other.

    8. Re:Oh yes indeed.... by aralin · · Score: 2

      I'm totally with you, but I don't think you take it far enough. I demand that shoplifters, hackers and wife beaters be pursued by FBI, but also CIA, NSA, DEA and FDA as well. You can never be too careful about them national security threatening shoplifting terrorists!

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    9. Re:Oh yes indeed.... by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Funny

      He owns an iPhone, and the instruction manual on how to hold it.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    10. Re:Oh yes indeed.... by evilviper · · Score: 2

      There is nothing of greater threat to national security than a HOMELESS hacker.

      A friend of mine was homeless. The only homeless guy I knew who wore $1,000+ suits and drove a Mercedes. He was traveling so much he just decided not to pay for a place he'd barely ever use.

      A few years ago I couldn't imagine going without a permanent residence, but the rise of smartphones, netbooks, tablets, flat-screen TVs, Hulu/Netfix, etc., has seen me reconsidering that position quite a bit, lately. These days, when I'm traveling, even if I'm going to be away for weeks, I pack clothes, toiletries, and my cellphone charger (and headphones)... Nothing else.

      I only wish the built-in speakers were better. Two great-sounding, front-facing speakers on my phone would be awesome. If Archos can manage that in their small, dirt cheap "tablets", why can't Moto/HTC/Samsung?

      With technology continuing to make everything smaller and more mobile, I'm thinking living in a van (in a nice area) might actually be a reasonable option. And if you thought it was bad how people would go camping in their RVs and just take their whole life with them, just wait...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  4. I am wondering by Osgeld · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How they know the homeless guy did it, yes I know its not impossible for people to get on a computer, but unless the guy had a freaking home office in his box its probably going to be on shared computers

    this will be interesting when there is more than a 1 paragraph blurb

  5. Low-hanging fruit & lazy Feds. by Tommy+Bologna · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a good thing the FBI is swatting at these gnats, diverting resources from investigating Chinese hacking, rampant industrial espionage, or the ubiquitous banking fraud. Fantastic work, G-men! You're making us proud.

  6. A lesson to learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He got caught because he REGISTERED his username on the internet. This breaks rule #1 of the internet, what's posted cannot be unposted.

    I was reading the court indictment wondering if they were somehow able to trace a proxy after the fact of use, which with something like TOR is quite the feat, but no, dude signed up to hidemyass.com, used the SAME user name, and thus will now meet Bubba in prison. Ah, the world of hacking, a mistake, and its your ass.

    1. Re:A lesson to learn by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 2

      This further confirms my lack of conviction that they have caught anyone of importance at all... Who's word are we going on here that these guys are big kahunas anyway?

      --
      RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
  7. Oh No!!! Not Our Website!!! How Will We Survive? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, that's part of the hilarity with these lulsec/anonymous kids. They keep picking fights with ginormously powerful entities which would not think twice about tossing them into small cells at the bottom of a deep holes, yet they seem to feel these Death Star Agencies and Corporations will back off due to the punks' mad skillz with internet servers.

    In Chicago, they call that "bringing a knife to a gun fight."

  8. Re:Hang Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not willing to claim they are all "activists." But there is certainly an activist component to what they do.

    And at the same time, power hates being stood up to. Stand up to the MafiAA, stand up to the abusive assholes at Sony, stand up to abusive cops who don't like the idea of being caught on video shooting a handcuffed homeless guy in the back, caught beating up a special ed kid, or try to get a 75-year charge on someone for recording them.

    So it's not surprising the FBI are engaged in what many will see as an overreaction. Especially when they need to be "seen to be doing something" to look good for their corrupt politician bosses.

  9. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These people always seem totally unaware of how law enforcement works - slowly and methodically. You didn't get away just because no-one kicked down your door right away, instead they're out there collecting evidence with which to nail you.

  10. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's PR control by the law enforcement. Arrest a few people here and there and no one really makes a fuss... Arrest hundreds of people at one time and people start questioning what's happening...

  11. National Security threat modeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If national security can be threatened by Anonymous or Lulz, it seems to me we don't have much in the way of national security.

  12. Re:I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dave's not here man.

  13. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or the first rounds of kids they picked up in the UK and US started rolling over on others. Which would be a bit... humorous. We know that many of the ones at the top know each others identities. And it wouldn't be entirely surprising, given that they nailed the important kids first. Ideologies can degrade quickly when you're being held by the authorities and looking at a prison term.

    The important take-away here is, Anon is not some leaderless collective of political activists. There is a top, and the remaining bulk are just kids that are occasionally used as DDoS drones. Those few people steer the rest to engage in some truly dumb activities, while they attempt slightly more involved "hacks" in the background, figuring that if anyone is ever caught, it'll be the drones.

    Authorities got some of the heads, and now they're taking everyone else down, bit-by-bit. Various pretenders will call themselves "Anon" in the future, but the ones you actually know from headlines are a small group of people, and they're being thoroughly routed. As was predicted.

    I'm not happy or sad about it, really. I just think it's obvious that the pretentious image of a leaderless, rogue group of genuinely anonymous people acting to right social wrongs is mostly bogus. It just makes good copy.

  14. Re:Homeless? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

    No, thats not what homeless means. Homeless means you dont have a permenant residence-- you could be at a shelter, or moving from friend's house to friend's house, or you could be "on the streets", or any number of other possibilities.

    Seeing as hackers tend to need internet access, Im guessing its one of the first two.

  15. Re:Cue the Politcal Perseqution Posts by tmosley · · Score: 2

    Probably the French.

    Damn Frenchies. I need some Freedom Fries!

  16. Re:Oh No!!! Not Our Website!!! How Will We Survive by the_raptor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, the point is it is funny. That is it. Anonymous is in it for the lulz. If some of the horde gets taken out nobody really cares.

    Also "LulzSec" are actually pretty terrible at hacking. Most of it is really low rent exploits and social engineering which is why it is so amusing how much "damage" they have caused. The only thing that makes them a cut above a thousand other minor hackers is that they are publicising it, which is exactly the best way to piss the corporations off. They don't care that much about the intrusions, just that their customers are finding out how unsafe these "trusted" companies are.

    P.S. The real dangerous hackers live in non-extradition countries and have thugs with guns at hand. They aren't scared of the FBI.

    --

    ========
    CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
  17. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's PR control by the law enforcement. Arrest a few people here and there and no one really makes a fuss... Arrest hundreds of people at one time and people start questioning what's happening...

    Bullshit. Arrest hundreds of people at one time and it's called a "crackdown." The Fibbies have done it before, and they'd do it again in a heartbeat if they knew enough.

    And people would applaud it if they did. The Anonymous clowns have done a lousy job of drumming up sympathy for their supposed cause. What they call "protests" come across as stupid childish pranks and vandalism, because nobody took responsibility, nobody stood up for the "cause." (Real sit-ins have people lining up to be arrested and declining bail to fill the jails and make their point.)

  18. Re:Well... by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lets add the word 'corrupted' to that "Law Enforcement". Conspiracy charges are typically what is used when there is no real evidence that an individual has actually committed a crime but instead they are going for sounds like, looks like they might have charges. Also police, only police the laws, they absolutely do not enforce the laws (this is the delusion of ignorant crew cut jock thugs in uniform) the courts enforce the laws.

    A lot of countries reject conspiracy laws because inevitable 'Law Enforcement' (again read power mad douches in uniform) types routinely conspire to twist evidence and testimony under threat of punishment, to create cases to suit promotions, rather than any real evidence.

    Seriously, I mean really seriously, look at the people they have arrested and the pseudo charges used. This is what they call a 'NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT', it hard to tell whether to call it FBI ego bloating or just grovelling to corporate profits and power. Yeah, let's all panic because a few individuals used DDOs to temporarily disrupt access to an internet bill board, let's all pretend that a temporary IP address (used to monitor a minor billing account) is all the evidence you need and of course that testimony under threat of decades of imprisoment means anything (this from a country that legalised physical torture or at least pretended to and, where psychological torture is to be expected and even sickly enough demanded).

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  19. Re:Well... by Stan92057 · · Score: 2

    Like it or not they are criminals. Everything they have done they broke laws. Its not there jobs to get back at the man,and even in a couple of cases the man went to jail for what he did. They will do there time as well, as they should . Break the law pay the price man up.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  20. Re:Hang Them by russotto · · Score: 2

    2 wrongs don't make a right,never has never will.

    Not only do two wrongs make a right, they're one of very few things that can, when the entity committing the initial wrong is not much less powerful than the initial wronged entity.

  21. Re:Hang Them by westlake · · Score: 2

    Stand up to the MafiAA, stand up to the abusive assholes at Sony, stand up to abusive cops who don't like the idea of being caught on video shooting a handcuffed homeless guy in the back, caught beating up a special ed kid, or try to get a 75-year charge on someone for recording them.

    No sense of proportion, a culture of victimhood.

    The MafiAA, as some like to call it, simply stands between the geek and his free movie fix and the ego boost that comes with sharing files with 15,000 of your closest friends on the P2P nets.

  22. Re:Hang Them by TheRealGrogan · · Score: 2

    No, two wrongs do not make a right. However, it has been proven, with blackboards full of numbers with squiggly symbols and shit, that 2 wrongs squared, divided by the square root of 1 minus the universal gravitational constant, times the indefinite integral of fuck you, do.

  23. Re:Hang Them by cffrost · · Score: 2

    The MafiAA, as some like to call it [...]

    They call themselves that, troll: http://mafiaa.org/

    --
    Thank you, Edward Snowden.

    "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  24. "Conspiracy" is a pile-on charge in this case by Quila · · Score: 2

    They are charging him with "causing intentional damage to a protected computer." But since he did it in coordination with others, they can add the "conspiracy to" charge as well.

    Conspiracy is also used when people are planning a crime, and there is clear evidence of such, but they haven't yet commited the crime. If you don't like this concept, maybe you'd rather the police sit back and let a group plotting to kill you do it so the prosecutor can get actual murder charges instead of just conspiracy to murder.

  25. Re:Well... by dave562 · · Score: 2

    Those guys wanted to stick to to the man and buck the system. They knew what they were getting into, or at least they should have. It was well known even back in the 1990s that the Feds and corporate America had zero interest in actually securing their systems. The systems are wide open (more or less), but the punishment for accessing them without permission is draconian. There is a reason I got out of the "computer underground" when I turned 18. I had my mischievous fun when I was a minor and then I saw the writing on the wall when people I knew personally had to deal with the Feds. The Feds do not screw around when it comes to computer crime.

    At the end of the day when all is said and done, LulzSec and Anonymous have not really stood up against the real oppressors. They have not taken down the Federal Reserve. They are not going after Wall Street and the various financial entities that really control "the system" that they are so against. Those are real hardened targets. They went after Sony. Really though, what is Sony doing to oppress the people of the world? They run a video game network that people use to decompress and chill out for a little bit. Does Sony have shady business practices? Sure. But the answer to that is to not buy their products. It's not like the Playstation 3 is really the core of SkyNet and PSN is the network that is enabling it to become sentient so that it can rule us all with a digitized iron fist.