Slashdot Mirror


China's Alibaba Interested In Buying Yahoo

jfruhlinger writes "Alibaba is a company that most Americans probably haven't heard of, but it's a hugely important Internet player in China, owning the Yahoo! China site as well as a host of other marketplace Websites. It's 40 percent owned by Yahoo, but now, in what seems a bit like a snake eating its own tail, Alibaba CEO Jack Ma has declared his interest in buying the embattled Internet portal outright." The San Francisco Chronicle has a Bloomberg News article with more details; they report that Alibaba is actually one of three parties looking into a joint bid for Yahoo, the others being the equity firm Silver Lake and Russian tech investor Digital Sky Technologies.

35 of 56 comments (clear)

  1. I'm confused by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    they report that Alibaba is actually one of three parties looking into a joint bid for Yahoo, the others being the equity firm Silver Lake and Russian tech investor Digital Sky Technologies.

    So how's the joke supposed to go now? "In capitalist Russia, Chinese employee buys YAHOO!"?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:I'm confused by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Informative

      they report that Alibaba is actually one of three parties looking into a joint bid for Yahoo, the others being the equity firm Silver Lake and Russian tech investor Digital Sky Technologies.

      So how's the joke supposed to go now? "In capitalist Russia, Chinese employee buys YAHOO!"?

      In Soviet China Yahoo searches for YOU!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. perhaps a snake extracting its tail by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Alibaba's been interested in buying back the Yahoo-owned portion of the company for a while, and with Yahoo's current stock price and the success of Alibaba, just buying Yahoo might be a reasonably cost-effective way to buy itself back.

  3. Please no by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 2

    Alibaba's main business is to try to connect no-name chinese manufacturers with distributors elsewhere. The site is garbage. If you thoughtYahoo was bad before... *shudder*

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    1. Re:Please no by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      I hit Alibaba.com and it didn't look that bad. No worse than any other generic or broad commerce site like Craigslist or eBay or Amazon.

    2. Re:Please no by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Mod up! Alibaba is nothing more than search engine pollution.

      Thanks for the reminder. Just added it to my hosts blockfile. :)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:Please no by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      But just try buying anything on Alibaba Express. You won''t get it.

    4. Re:Please no by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't believe how much crap the Chinese people tolerate on web sites.

      Between the slow spyware ridden browsers, IE6-only Javascript errors, malfunctioning ad popups, and general poor user interfaces etc., they somehow manage to use those sites.

      It's amazing.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    5. Re:Please no by satuon · · Score: 1

      That actually sounds like a very good idea - a wholesalers' ebay so to speak.

  4. Sell off America by koan · · Score: 2

    I noticed several brand names I associate with "America" are now owned by some one else, I wonder if selling off Yahoo would the loss of all the American jobs hired there.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/08/american-brands-in-foreig_n_755900.html#s152955&title=Budweiser

    But hey what's in a name right.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Sell off America by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I noticed several brand names I associate with "America" are now owned by some one else, I wonder if selling off Yahoo would the loss of all the American jobs hired there.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/08/american-brands-in-foreig_n_755900.html#s152955&title=Budweiser

      But hey what's in a name right.

      Before the 1960's the largest foreign holders of property in America were the Netherlands.

      In the 1970's people (particularly where I lived) were alarmed when the Saudis came in and began buying obscure local banks, companies and properties.

      In the 1980's the Japanese were buying up golf courses, movie studios, huge ranches, you name it.

      Now the Chinese are looking to buy and people are getting worried all over again.

      I'll only worry when they make a bid for the State of California.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Sell off America by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      The Chicoms are too smart to make a bonehead move like that.

      Yeah, the last thing the Chinese need is for their country to be flooded with Communists.

    3. Re:Sell off America by koan · · Score: 1

      Yes but you can't really move a building or a golf course, Internet companies can have their physical servers anywhere, so why would you buy Yahoo and keep all the American fat when you can easily transition to a well educated and cheaper workforce in China?

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    4. Re:Sell off America by Surt · · Score: 1

      But fat uneducated Americans deserve jobs!

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:Sell off America by koan · · Score: 1

      My view on what is "deserved" has changed quite a bit, no one really "deserves" anything in the truest sense, you want that land? Can you hold it? You want that job? Can you work it?

      Some one had to hold the land, some one had to make the law, some one had to enforce it, and some one had to tell you you deserve something.
      But in reality with out the prior being true then your deserving and your rights are not true and certainly not the reality of life (try explaining your rights and what you deserve to a hungry tiger).

      Slap all the civilization paint on this jalopy you want when it's all said and done Mother Natures rule still applies.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  5. Re:Jack Ma is a swindler by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

    Well, Ali Baba did hang around with a bunch of thieves. If that doesn't set the alarm bells ringing I don't know what would.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  6. Hooray for hypocrisy! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    Of course the ironic thing is that China absolutely forbids any foreign company from owning any decent % of a Chinese internet firm, but they seem to have no qualms with a Chinese firm buys a foreign internet firm. Sort of like how all protectionism is bad according to Hu Jintao, except for Chinese protectionism of course which is good and despite the fact that he criticizes other countries' trade policy, said Chinese protectionism should not be criticized by anyone else.

    1. Re:Hooray for hypocrisy! by Niac · · Score: 2

      That isn't hypocrisy. It's self-interest. Their policies are internally consistent: they desire a strong China. Not permitting foreign investors, and permitting local investments to be made in foreign markets makes for a strong China. Not that I agree with it, mind you. But that's how it appears.

      --
      http://gabrielcain.com/
    2. Re:Hooray for hypocrisy! by hackingbear · · Score: 2

      Actually what you said isn't quite true. Alibaba, along with most top Internet companies in China, are technically foreign companies. The holding companies are registered in Cayman Island and Bermuda; the operating subsidiaries are Chinese companies. These companies all have foreign investors including Silicon Valley venture capital. Alibaba, for example, is still 40% owned by Yahoo. Softbank also owns a big trunk.

      The Chinese government's intend is to protect the market from foreign companies which have had huge financial powers; if unrestricted, these greedy foreign companies will just grab over the whole market when the domestic players were still young and vulnerable and Chinese people will stuck in low end manufacturing forever without marketing power.

      But lawyers know how to work around the Chinese rules, like they do to US laws. So very often, those rules are ineffective in practice.

    3. Re:Hooray for hypocrisy! by Surt · · Score: 1

      That's strategy, not irony.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Hooray for hypocrisy! by satuon · · Score: 1

      I've heard that Yahoo owns 40% of Alibaba.

  7. Re:No by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

    Nothing a few bribes or lobbyists won't fix.

    If the RIAA/MPAA have proven anything, The US government is for sale to the highest bidder.

    The "Occupy Wall Street" thing might change things but only if they go totally "muslim spring".

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  8. I was robbed on Alibaba by ravenswood1000 · · Score: 1

    Don't think that them getting Yahoo is a good idea.

  9. This is such a bad idea by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    but I'm not quite sure for whom. Let's just say everybody.

  10. Yahoo? Serious? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    How are they at all relevant anymore?
    OK, I like flickr.
    And I guess some people still use yahoo groups. old people

    looks like half the services they used to provide are defunct

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  11. Re:No by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "The U.S. will not allow such a sale to proceed."

    +5 Funny!

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  12. Re:I'm in your server, reading your mail by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    There are people who still use Yahoo Mail?

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  13. Me too! Alibaba is horrible to use by witherstaff · · Score: 1

    Alibaba, and a number of other sites like them, are horrible to do business with. Yes, it can be done. However even contacting the 'gold member' sellers that are supposed to have factories and company physically checked by alibaba often leads to failures to get the same offers they list on the site. If you can't find someone that will use an escrow, you ARE going to get ripped off. If you want a standard commodity then that's doable. If you want something tech oriented it can be a nightmare.

    I recently was looking for a specific product and tried to find a seller on alibaba, newer-ish tech product. I found a valid looking gold member vendor, thought things were good, wired money... and never heard from the people again. So I wrote that off as me being stupid and not using an escrow. I found a few dozen companies that were all gold member rated (A paid service of Alibaba to verify the seller) and contacted them. My demands were simple, I wanted the listed minimum order and wanted to use the escrow which their listing also said they would do. Then a funny thing happened, I started getting 2 or 3 times as many emails back than I sent. Most from domains that had only been registered in the past few months, but they had my original RFQ information. None of the original companies responded, I can only imagine they're legit "fronts" to get the gold member star and employees either outright divert RFQs to another sister company, or do it without management knowing. I spent hours and could not find a single one that would do an escrow so I knew I'd be screwed. Thinking it was me, I went to a friend who is fluent in chinese and works in the tech industry and is living overseas. His advice was the service attracts those who think profit at all possibilities and has no qualms about outright defrauding the customer. In a nutshell it's an international craigslist with no buyer protection and more than likely you will get screwed.

    The one place that may work is the aliexpress. It's a store front with multiple vendors and alibaba itself handles the transactions, and can pay with credit card. That does give you some buyer protection but pricing is nowhere near as attractice as the normal alibaba

  14. Re:Jack Ma is a swindler by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

    Ali Baba was actually the nemesis of the titular band of thieves. He stole from the cave in which they stored their gold by eavesdropping and learning the password ("open sesame").

    His clever slave-girl managed to kill the thieves when they came in search of vengeance.

    This is all off-topic, just noticed that you were clearly unfamiliar with anything other than the title of the story you referenced. Similar to claiming, "Indiana Jones's HQ is the Temple of Doom, after all, so we shouldn't be surprised that Jones Widget Corporation (based in Indiana) has poor hiring policies."

  15. Time to find a new email host... by Tasha26 · · Score: 1

    I think history speaks for itself. You don't want a Russian, Arab or Chinese buyer for your personal email account. Better say goodbye to privacy.

    1. Re:Time to find a new email host... by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      Hell, these days you don't even want an American in charge of your information (facebook, google, anybody?) Not to imply that Americans are any more or less trustworthy than anybody else, I'll leave that argument aside for now.

      I like google, but they DO definitely track my stuff, I'm STILL seeing Tire ads show up 2 weeks after I quit shopping online for tires...

      One just cannot trust anybody with one's private information, brings to mind the old adage "Three people can keep a secret, if two of them are dead." In this case, history does indeed speak for itself, but it is not anything as current as privacy on the internet, it's as timeless as secrets in general.

    2. Re:Time to find a new email host... by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      This just came to mind as I'm tracking a UPS package from Canada...I wonder if UPS tracks everything they've ever sent to me...location, store type, declared value (if applicable), etc.

    3. Re:Time to find a new email host... by satuon · · Score: 1

      That's why I'm glad I'm using gmail.

  16. Re:Why is it... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

    Because this is an economic practice that only works when you're a developing country with a consumer base that foreign companies are drooling over to get access to. This practice will die once the Chinese market matures, because foreign companies will either be there already, or will have decided against entering it.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  17. Re:Jack Ma is a swindler by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

    In my defence I haven't heard/read/seen the story in well over 30 years. And accuracy would have been even more appropriate, since Ali Baba was both a thief (though not one of the 40, he just stole from them) and a slave owner, so fair call.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.