Slashdot Mirror


Searching For Mark Pilgrim

First time accepted submitter microphage writes "Mark Pilgrim, author of many 'Dive into ...' books and guides, has — as the saying now goes — 'committed infosuicide,' which happily isn't like the real sort. Except it affects the info that you've created. Let's hope Dive Into HTML5 has some sort of permanence."

56 of 89 comments (clear)

  1. Commentary on Archive Team? by ebunga · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is commentary on Archive Team?

  2. I Certainly Hope He's Not Gone by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Informative
    I reviewed his book for Slashdot when it came out and it got an 8/10 because it needed more details (not entirely his fault that HTML5 was still being implemented).

    I do recall he was great at mixing in humor and entertainment into an otherwise dry and toilsome subject matter so may I say that I sincerely hope he hasn't given up on technical aspirations. At the time that book was one of the best general resources out there for HTML5. I'm sad that his github repo for the book may only exist at mirrors now.

    From a comment on the article:

    His GitHub projects have been mirrored:

    https://github.com/diveintomark

    Dive Into Python 3
    Online: http://diveintopython3.ep.io/
    GitHub: https://github.com/diveintomark/diveintopython3

    Dive Into HTML5
    Online: http://diveintohtml5.ep.io/
    GitHub: https://github.com/diveintomark/diveintohtml5

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:I Certainly Hope He's Not Gone by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      About 8 years ago, I bought "Diving Into Python" (after reading a review here on Slashdot, I believe), and agree about his ability to make things interesting and amusing at the same time. Ah, well. Good luck to him.

    2. Re:I Certainly Hope He's Not Gone by Animats · · Score: 1

      His "feedparser" site is down, but the software is still at Google Code, and there are other maintainers.

  3. committed "infosuicide"... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So what. It's his life, and he can live it as he chooses.
    Nobody can blame him for wanting to escape the incipient idiocracy of facebook/twitter/etc.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:committed "infosuicide"... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      So what. It's his life, and he can live it as he chooses.
      Nobody can blame him for wanting to escape the incipient idiocracy of facebook/twitter/etc.

      So instead we drag his cyber-carcass to /.

    2. Re:committed "infosuicide"... by Graymalkin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Deleting your Facebook and Twitter accounts is one thing, setting every website you've ever worked on to return HTTP 410 errors is something different entirely. Mark decided to take all his balls and go home and made damn sure you knew he was going.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    3. Re:committed "infosuicide"... by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      Maybe he just decided to take the free resource online and publish it as an income-generating book?

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    4. Re:committed "infosuicide"... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Also I appreciate how his own website is the 2nd hit on google for "http 410".

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    5. Re:committed "infosuicide"... by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he just decided to take the free resource online and publish it as an income-generating book?

      Then he probably should have chosen a different copyright license for his works.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    6. Re:committed "infosuicide"... by Millennium · · Score: 1

      It might still generate income. Especially in the tech industry, a surprising number of free online books have paid dead-tree versions.

    7. Re:committed "infosuicide"... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      It can generate income for the publisher, but not for the author. The publisher has no obligation to pay the author any cut.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  4. I was just looking for "Dive Into Python 3" by FoolishOwl · · Score: 1

    I had just started on "Dive Into Python 3" about a week ago, and yesterday I was going to re-download the zip file with the PDF of the book and the example programs on a virtual machine, when I discovered his site was down. Fortunately, I had the file elsewhere. I figured the site was down because of a temporary glitch.

    Incidentally, I had planned to order a physical copy of the book, but from the reviews on Amazon, the printing of "Dive Into Python 3" is of extraordinarily poor quality, with incorrect rendering of much of the source code, so that one is better off sticking to the free PDF. I hope it remains available for a while.

    It doesn't sound like there's an explanation yet for why he did this.

  5. My theory: by gblues · · Score: 5, Funny

    I blame a bad encounter with one of his cousin Scott's evil exes.

  6. Ha... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is all a marketing ploy for his forthcoming book "dive into HTTP 410", a self-help guide for anyone with a social networking account or those who host email with Google.

  7. Re:Inspiration. The suicide of one's online self. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What the fuck are you talking about?

  8. He's living life by hellfire · · Score: 2

    I was a personal acquaintance of his and coworker for about a year and kept in touch for years. I miss our monthly Chinese buffet lunches. Last I heard he was working at IBM as a consultant but that was years ago. I also know that he has two kids in the mid to high single digits. He's working, making plenty of money for his family, and taking care of his responsibilities. It's sad not to see more on his blog lately. However his primary money maker was not his blog or his books.

    I too have a blog but it was neither as popular or as entertaining, but the same thing happened to me. I've gotten married, assumed more family responsibilities, and I just don't have time to update it. Right now I'm sure his priorities are elsewhere. It's not infosuicide so much as we all want more and he's simply not giving it to us. I'm sorry to say you'll just have to move on. That's the beauty of the internet.

    Mark if you are out there, drop me a line sometime.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:He's living life by Anonymus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This doesn't even relate to taking your hobby blog offline. He didn't just close his social networking accounts, he took every site he ever worked on off the internet.

      "infosuicide" may be a dumb word, but I'd certainly say it's not just "we want more and he's not giving it to us". He wanted to take back everything he had previously given us. That's a bit unusual.

      And the beauty of the internet isn't to move on, it's nearly the opposite of that. Hundreds of people around the world had his stuff saved and are putting it back online even after he tried to destroy it. THAT is the beauty (and ugliness) of the internet.

    2. Re:He's living life by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      He wanted to take back everything he had previously given us. That's a bit unusual.

      It's not about us, it's about himself.

      I relate to what he did because I did it myself a while back. Let go of my personal domains, email accounts, self-hosted blogs and online image archives etc. I'm still on the net, obviously, just under a completely reorganized identity. I'm now much more careful about separating personally identifiable information from general romping across the net.

      Why? Because I had reached a point when I looked back at everything that could be tied to me online and it wasn't me anymore. The blogs contained some useful information but also a lot of it was outdated and some misguided or naive, or worse. Luckily, I have a common name and I've had the insight to mark all my pages "noarchive" so there's no cache in search engines or archive.org. So I just let go and moved on.

      People are not perfect, they change and sometimes grow up. But the Internet remembers everything and never lets you forget it. In real life you mostly get the benefit of forgive and forget because human memory is imperfect, but bring a perfect memory into the game and it gets ugly. People look at stuff you did or said 10 or 20 years ago and treat you like you're the same person you were back then.

      Besides, if some of the stuff Mark, or me, put online was really useful then someone will have a copy somewhere and will recover and share it. You can't expect the guy to live forever or his descendants to keep maintaining his website forever. At some point that site would either stop working or the information would become obsolete anyway.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    3. Re:He's living life by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You cannot remove pee from the pool.

      Of course you can. Do you think that all the pee (and other stuff) that has ever been deposited in your local swimming pool is still there?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:He's living life by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There is no statute of limitations on stupidity.

      If someone was a stupid, arrogant asshole twenty years ago, they will still be a stupid, arrogant asshole now, just better at hiding it.

      People's characters don't fundamentally change much past the age of ten.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:He's living life by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Until they drain it, yeah. They may neutralize it with various chemicals, but they'll never get it all.

    6. Re:He's living life by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling. Sometimes I think back to stuff I wrote online as a teenager, or, half my lifetime ago, and think "shit, thats still out there"?

      Luckily, someone with my name joined the Bostones, and so,.... I went from being 90% of the first 2 pages of google search on my name to...pretty much being banished from the first page of results (not sure where I am now) by his fame. At first I was shocked, and a bit annoyed, but, as time went on, I have come to appreciate it...that and that my old content is mostly very hard to find except by people who know exactly where to look.

      I had an online diary before livejournal. I can say I would hate to have to explain or defend some of the things that I wrote then. It makes me think of people who were sentanced to long jail sentences at 15 or even 20. It reminds me of an interview with someone who worked with death row inmates who said it was striking how many had been there for so long that they are barely the same people who committed their crimes, so many years ago.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    7. Re:He's living life by Kadmos · · Score: 1

      To play devils advocate, one would hope that in 10 or 20 years time you may look back on that comment and realise how limited and naive it is.

  9. Re:Inspiration. The suicide of one's online self. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure whatever it is, it involves a bong.

  10. Lucky Stiff by jtara · · Score: 1

    First, Why the Lucky Stiff. Then this. Coincidence?

    1. Re:Lucky Stiff by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      Have you ever seen them together?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  11. Strange, indeed by amliebsch · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he had a long talk with Francisco d'Anconia or something.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    1. Re:Strange, indeed by lgw · · Score: 1

      And here I was just arguing on /. about whether anyone would actually "go Galt" (I know folks who have, sort of) Interesting thought!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Strange, indeed by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      mod parent -1 ayn rand reference

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  12. Wikipedia too by heptapod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He's trying to remove himself from Wikipedia too and has been since 2008ish.

    For someone who appears to be savvy about computers and online culture it's funny he's unaware of the Streisand effect which is emphasized by the number of mirrors popping up across the internet despite his best efforts for infocide.

    1. Re:Wikipedia too by smelch · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he is acutely aware of this and is now removing his things so others will take the responsibility of making his previous work available while he does whatever else he wants without worrying about it.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
  13. Archives? by sootman · · Score: 1

    Dive into HTML5 has this at the beginning: "The Work shall remain online under the CC-BY-3.0 License." Anyone know a way to get complete archives of his books that's easier/better than scraping http://web.archive.org/web/20110726000452/http://www.diveintohtml5.org/ ?

    He was a fun guy. I'll miss his writings. I've been reading his stuff for about six years, starting with http://howto.diveintomark.org/ipod-dvd-ripping-guide/ , which got me into using Handbrake shortly after I got a video iPod. No more google cache, but at least he couldn't/didn't remove himself from archive.org

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Archives? by sootman · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I had a few windows open and didn't get through them all before posting. Mirrors listed in the comments here.

      Still, it's sad to think that there will be no fun, new, snarky writings forthcoming. :-(

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  14. Re:Inspiration. The suicide of one's online self. by kuiperbelt · · Score: 1

    It's not often I genuinely laugh out loud at a comment, so I congratulate you heartily on making me do so!

  15. A Serious Question by oldhack · · Score: 1

    Who gives a shit?

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  16. Mark Shaney strikes again! by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1

    Ignore these posts. Someone has been deploying what appears to be a Markov chain text generator all over Slashdot, which has previously been used on usenet (see Mark V Shaney) and I suspect The Daily Show with John Stewart, and with greater range, the Colbert Report.

    1. Re:Mark Shaney strikes again! by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Doesn't look Markov to me.

      It looks like a longstanding Slashdot user who may be (going) schizophrenic.

    2. Re:Mark Shaney strikes again! by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1

      Or a homeless person got access to the internet? No, I suspect it's the same person talking about Buffy the Vampire slayer, I say that cos I've seen it on at least two other forums other than in slashdot comments (schizo comments + Vampire slayer in the same thread). And I think it's something like the Markov anyways, whoever it is, is too smart to be that schizo.

  17. Jobs the Mark, or the other way round. by Frederico+Camara · · Score: 1

    Yesterday I read Steve Jobs was dead. Today, as I read that Dive into Python was gone offline, I thought: "No! Not Mark Pilgrim!"
    Thank God he's alive. Hope he ressurects Dive into Python soon. You can only make so much impact on people this once, like Jobs did.

  18. It's a pity. by Millennium · · Score: 1

    The man wrote a lot of great stuff. I learned Python using his guide to that language, and I used his HTML5 guide to keep current on that. I don't think I'll be alone in missing him.

    That said, he obviously intends for this to be permanent. He was a stickler for proper HTTP status codes, and wouldn't have his sites throw a 410 if he ever intended on bringing them back. Given the open nature of the things he wrote, it would have been nice of him to transfer maintenance of the guides before doing this. Archives and mirrors are springing up, so the work won't be lost. But if he wanted to go quietly, he could have made things much quieter by saying something.

    At the very least, he could have avoided this chaos and the police visit.

  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. hmm by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    Well, way to help a brother out.

  21. Re:John Galt? by Cragen · · Score: 1

    Oh, my. I wish I had mod points. Too bad John Galt was in such a (ultimately) useless book.

  22. why? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    everyone seems to be focused on the "he should be able to" and "we dont want to lose you" but nobody is asking, "why? why are you doing this?"

    if someone knows, just say it.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:why? by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Rather than merely Stop Posting (or paying for a domain), and instead actually putting the effort to remove one's creations is something which is both strange and uncommon on the internet. I never used anything he wrote (that I know of?), but am immensely curious as to what would cause a person to do this. It's VERY different from retiring an old machine or deciding that you don't care about a domain anymore enough to actually update its DNS (or pay for it, perhaps).

  23. as to why... by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    Here's hoping the reason isn't "Diving into the timezone database"...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  24. Re:John Galt? by lgw · · Score: 1

    No more useless than any other fiction. When I first tried to read it, I was put off by the poinlessly extreme cartoon villians. I read it recently and it was eerily predictive. Things seem to really be getting ugly these days as governments try anything at all except cutting spending to stave off financial collapse. (But families seem to be getting the "live within your means" message since 2008 or so, so maybe there's just a lag and in a few years the book will seem silly again.)

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  25. Researching a new book? by shish · · Score: 1

    "Dive out of the internet"?

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  26. Watch out for vitamin D deficiency from being... by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1
    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  27. tz by georgesdev · · Score: 1

    he got lost in between 2 timezones ;)

  28. Re:Goodbye. And Hello. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    I understand your move, Mark. You don't know me from Adam, but that's ok to - I completely understand. I've been at that edge, but haven't had the courage to step off and see if I will leap to the next building, or merely hit the ground.

    What a bunch of wank.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  29. Re:Inspiration. The suicide of one's online self. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Deep, like a tank full of slurry.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  30. Mirrors by ServerCobra · · Score: 1

    I was really sad to hear about Mark pulling down all these amazing resources. I've mirrored a bunch of them, and put them up at the .net versions of his domains. They are DiveIntoPython.net, DiveIntoPython3.net, and DiveIntoHTML5.net. Hopefully we can keep these super important resources up!

  31. Also mirrored here: by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

    http://diveintopython3.ep.io/

    This is the Python 3 version, last updated 2011. It is more current than the mirror in the main article.

  32. Re:-1 Richard Bach is a wanker by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    "Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it"

    Trust me. You don't really want to repeat the 1970s ... or the 1980s ... and especially not the 2000s.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey