Cloned Drug-Sniffing Dogs Prove Successful In South Korea
Rexdude writes "A prized drug-sniffing dog at Incheon Airport in South Korea was cloned four years ago, and now the clones have proven to be much more successful at becoming sniffer dogs themselves compared to regular dogs. Not as controversial as human cloning, but are we going to see genetic copyrights on prized animal breeds in the future?"
Bees are where it's at
Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
They should use their powers for good. Give every child a clone of Lassie.
Pure-bred dogs are bred in such a small population that they were getting pretty close to being clones anyway.
They are the most expensive non-Human animals right? Other than perhaps extinct animals that people want to bring back like the Saber-tooth tiger, the wooly mammoth and the Dodo (not). What about truffle finding pigs?
Actually maybe certain transgenic animals that have had their DNA altered to express useful drugs (like goats with insulin laced milk) might be more expensive.
Anyway, is it illegal race a cloned racehorse? Will they be requiring genetic tests on all winning racehorses? What about race horses that have already died (Seabiscuit?).
No wonder, they are they smartest dogs on this planet. And really good friends. And really kids friendly.
Monsanto has already patented their GMOs. Silly to ask if somethings goign to happen when it's already done.
I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
I remember the Toronto airport security testing out one of the electronic sniffers. It was supposed to be much more sensitive than dogs are.
The problem is, it was too sensitive. It turns out that after a few decades of smuggling, pretty much every surface in the baggage handling are has been exposed to drugs or explosives at some time or other, so the electronic sniffer kept going off.
When they turned down the sensitivity, it was no better than a dog.
Case in point: 90 percent of U.S. bils carry traces of cocaine. The fact that a sniffer or a dog "goes off" only justifies further investigation; it's far from proof.
I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
How do they prove successful? Do Cloned Drug-Sniffing Dogs simply taste better?
I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
That's why we should use cats instead: cats wouldn't respond to cues from the handler.
I swear I read GATTACA