Slashdot Mirror


EU Debates Installing a Black Box On Your Computer

bs0d3 writes "EU MEP Tiziano Motti (Italy), wants everything you do online to be logged and saved, for the sake of the children. Like a black box installed on every computer. He proposes an early warning system of criminal activity, specifically whenever an image of sexually abused children is detected, an alarm, goes to the authorities to be able to see who uploaded it. Tiziano Motti was a politician who just over a year ago managed to get a majority of European Members of Parliament to support the proposal to expand the data storage directive to Google searches. The purpose was to protect children from pedophiles — the same excuse he is using now. His proposal involves a technology called Logbox. And just as with an aircraft's black box, Logbox is installed on computers, laptops, smartphones, and e-readers because yes, all that can be connected to the internet."

60 of 459 comments (clear)

  1. Mr Motti: by zero.kalvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fuck you!

    1. Re:Mr Motti: by Stuarticus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe he should clean up his own house before getting started on everyone else's... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvio_Berlusconi_underage_prostitution_charges

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    2. Re:Mr Motti: by Shisha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Second that!

      You'd think that Italian MEPs would have better things to worry about right now, like not being able to borrow money if it wasn't for ECB and possibly not being able to pay their debts.

      But no, that c.nt wants to have a way to let the government to spy on everyone.

    3. Re:Mr Motti: by gmack · · Score: 2

      Most plans if this kind can be covered by the saying "Anything is easy if you don't know what you are talking about."

    4. Re:Mr Motti: by qubex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That’s rude. I’m Italian and I hate the situation.

      And yes, I hate this fool’s proposal too.

      I wonder what country you herald from? What’s your country’s worst historical figure? How about I compare you to that person?

      --
      "Place me in the company of those who seek Truth, but deliver me from those who believe to have found it."
    5. Re:Mr Motti: by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder what country you herald from? Whatâ(TM)s your countryâ(TM)s worst historical figure? How about I compare you to that person?

      I'm Canadian, and I think we've already apologised enough for Celine Dion.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  2. Fuck you Italy by funkatron · · Score: 2

    Would someone from Italy like to explain why you voted this authoritarian cunt into the EU. Go on! I'd love to hear it!

    --
    "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    1. Re:Fuck you Italy by bky1701 · · Score: 2

      WWIII could end our economic problems. Will someone please think of the children and invade Italy?

    2. Re:Fuck you Italy by __Paul__ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Such a contradiction in terms. Christianity is not democratic. When was the last time God ran for election?

      --
      worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    3. Re:Fuck you Italy by Vectormatic · · Score: 2

      Would someone from Italy like to explain why you voted this authoritarian cunt into the EU. Go on! I'd love to hear it!

      Wouldnt know about the italian angle, but as a dutch guy, one of the reasons to vote for someone to get into the EU stuff is to get him out of local politics, perhaps the italians were just fed up with this idiot so much they decided to "promote him away"

      Also, fuck that guy.

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    4. Re:Fuck you Italy by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

      Such a contradiction in terms. Christianity is not democratic. When was the last time God ran for election?

      Is that you Lucifer?

    5. Re:Fuck you Italy by muckracer · · Score: 2

      > When was the last time God ran for election?

      You could say, he (God/Jesus) were elected to their currently held positions in A.D. 325 at the First Council of Nicaea, where Jesus got promoted from just being a human to exclusive God privileges by a, albeit tight, vote by those present at the council. By extension, his now official Father (sorry, Joseph!) got simultaneously a vote of confidence (of existence and supreme rule).

    6. Re:Fuck you Italy by angelofdarkness · · Score: 2
      Damm between Berlusconi's shenanigans, the terrible state of Italian politics and now this I'm starting to be ashamed to be Italian.

      Would someone from Italy like to explain why you voted this authoritarian cunt into the EU. Go on! I'd love to hear it!

      Anyhow, most of the people voted into the EU are unknown to the voters because most people just vote the Party (Motti is part of the Christian Democrat Union -- UDC). Now you can express one or more preferences (up to 3 I think) for a single person and the vote goes to the political party and to the person(s). Total votes to the political party determine the number of seats, and total personal votes determine who gets elected. In case of a tie, the position in an internal list determines who goes so, in the extreme case where votes are only given to the party and no candidates receive a personal vote, the people that get elected are the first ones on the list... the list is obviously determined by the Party.
      Now not many voters in Italy know that they can express a personal preference in the EU elections (because in the national elections you cannot express a preference for a candidate -- you vote the party and the party chooses who gets elected according to the list) the above situation is not far-fetched. Add to this that most people in Italy honestly don't give a fuck about who is elected and tend to vote by "habit" (as in "I'm a Christian so I have to vote the Christian Party...") and you can see how a bunch of fascist, racist, close-minded cunts; some shady persons and even showgirls can get elected to the EU.

    7. Re:Fuck you Italy by CoderFool · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do people assume that the christians are the ones always behind these kind of fascist actions? If you go to far LEFT or RIGHT you find fascist extremists. In the US it isn't the conservatives or christians behind all the PC fascism and 'spread the wealth' crap, it is the liberals. Censorship in the form that you can't say anything negative about minorities or LGBT. Communism in the way they wan't to tax you to death so the greedy poor can have food and shelter without lifting a finger to work (not all poor are greedy, just 'occupiers' and the like). Fascism in the way they say you can't have fat or salt or have incandescent bulbs. 'Saving the planet' is crap when you mandate CFLs with toxic mercury powder or electric cars with toxic metal batteries or biofuels that drive up worldwide food prices and are worst CO2 emitters than petroleum. Don't get me wrong. I don't mind my taxes going to help the truly needy. I think we should try to do better by our environment, but what's the point in breaking our economy when other big polluters, like China and India and Brazil, aren't doing the same? Or do we need a fascist world government to force them? and OBTW when you give anyone too much power to do one thing, they will likely abuse that power whether they lean right or left. If you want economin communism of fascist environmentalism, don't be surprised if the empowered individuals use that power to regulate other aspects of your life and destroy all your freedoms. Can't have guns because of the lead. Can't have fat or salt because of the expense to the health care system. an so on and so forth

    8. Re:Fuck you Italy by mcvos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is voting for Berlusconi really less stupid than voting for Bush? I hate Bush as much as the next guy, but I have my doubts in this case. Berlusconi was re-elected several times, even after it was abundantly clear that he was completely and irredeemably corrupt. Bush was an idiot, lied and instigated war, but Berlusconi appears to be an avatar of Satan himself. He was good buddies with Khadafi and Putin, likes calling German politicians nazi camp guards, has wild sex parties with barely legal prostitutes, controls most Italian media, partially as leader of the government, partially because of his own private media imperium. And he keeps introducing new laws to protect himself from criminal prosecution for all the cases of corruption he's been involved in.

    9. Re:Fuck you Italy by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

      This came as a shock coming fresh on the heels of being promoted to a human from a myth some years earlier.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  3. Opposite Effect by igreaterthanu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Studies have shown a negative correlation between the availability of porn and rape cases. IIRC this is also the case specifically with CP and child rape. If anything, this will make it worse for the children.

    Not to mention the problems with a software based solution. The software will, of course, only run on certain operating systems, who is the government to mandate I purchase a particular operating system/or agree to a contract (e.g. the GPL)? Anyone who knows what they are doing can get around this anyway. Even if it calls home, it could be faked by using a VM.

    --
    I dream of a nation where a man is not judged by his skin color but by an number assigned by a credit rating agency.
    1. Re:Opposite Effect by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Never mind that, here's some statistics!

      a) Most of the computers in the world are not involved in distribution of indecent images of minors.
      b) Most of the incidents of sexual indecency with a minor are by members of the family, or close family friends.

      Therefore, to have a greater chance of saving more children from sexual predators, we should ignore computers and break up all families. (Liberal use of the "~" marker here, folks).

      Child exploitation, of all sorts, is very serious. However, this kind of outright idiocy on the part of policy makers is starting to make me physically ill. There are so many reason why this is an awful, awful idea, and I know I don't need to spell them out.

      Why can't we have politicians who can think rationally?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Opposite Effect by Ardeaem · · Score: 2

      Not necessarily by legal definitions. Some jurisdictions have decided that pornography that shows virtual children is prosecutable, and yet does not require the sexual abuse of children. I guess maybe by "appropriate" definition, you meant your own definition, but even though the US Supreme Court decided that virtual child pornography is protected in some cases, that doesn't mean it isn't (or shouldn't be considered) child pornography.

    3. Re:Opposite Effect by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not about kids, it's about control (and media rights)

    4. Re:Opposite Effect by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Stop thinking that this has anything to do with porn. Stop thinking that the promoters of such laws care at all about pedophilia and fighting it. If they really cared, they would listen to the policemen and non-profits fighting it that censorship would be counter-productive.

      They just hate internet. It is the #2 media behind TV and is still gaining importance. They want to be able to control it. They want to be able to shut down websites. They need to tackle protests.

      The plan is simple : first, put a mechanism to fight against pedophilia. Then extend it to fight terrorism. Then, using the vague definitions of terrorism, use these tools to squash any kind of protest, because disturbing traffic is akin to terrorism.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:Opposite Effect by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why can't we have politicians who can think rationally?

      They rationally play on people's irrational fears. Don't assume all politicians are drooling idiots, being a successful politician and a successful manipulator share many of the same traits.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Opposite Effect by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Why can't we have politicians who can think rationally?

      Because most of us don't enjoy arguing all day long which is pretty much what politicians do. Unlike the court room where they may be jurist or jury who is somewhat interested in facts to convince, these people win or lose principally on whether they can last longer than the other guys.
      You must have strong opinions to prevail in that system. The type of person attracted to that job is fundamentally not the type let facts get in the way of their opinions.
        BTW I am not a psychologist, sociologist, nor do I have any academic background which would permit me any special understanding of the above. You may consider it fact, that this post is only my opinion.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    7. Re:Opposite Effect by bjourne · · Score: 2

      Studies have shown a negative correlation between the availability of porn and rape cases. IIRC this is also the case specifically with CP and child rape. If anything, this will make it worse for the children.

      You need to provide more specific sources than "studies have shown" for that statement. It is true that the availability of porn has exploded since the 90's when internet became widely available to the public. The number of sex abuse cases has not increased anywhere near as much as it would have if there was a positive correlation between porn and sex abuse. On the other hand, and using the same logic, the amount of sex crimes has not decreased sufficiently (it has actually increased) that the explosion of porn would availability would predict if there was a negative correlation between them.

    8. Re:Opposite Effect by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      Stop thinking that the promoters of such laws care at all about pedophilia and fighting it. If they really cared, they would listen to the policemen and non-profits fighting it that censorship would be counter-productive.

      You are making a fundamental mistake of logic here. Not all of the promoters of such laws are self serving, corrupt liars, a few of them are just stupid.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    9. Re:Opposite Effect by mooingyak · · Score: 2

      Studies have shown a negative correlation between the availability of porn and rape cases.

      Citation please. And not because I doubt you. I've heard about this before, even remember reading it somewhere once. But googling "rape" and "porn" mysteriously doesn't seem to get me to any of those studies...

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    10. Re:Opposite Effect by delt0r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      14 is a teenager, not a child. Once upon a time, 14 year old's had full time jobs and got married.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    11. Re:Opposite Effect by adisakp · · Score: 2

      Passing laws for the good of the children is like telling a man he can’t have a steak because a baby can’t chew it. (borrowed from Mark Twain on Censorship).

  4. Don't Worry by HopefulIntern · · Score: 5, Informative
    Nothing will ever come of this. One crackpot idea from an idiot who knows nothing about technology does not constitute a reasonable proposal.

    FTFA:

    If it were China, North Korea or Saudi Arabia who had proposed this, what would we say then? It's scary in a democratic Europe to even hear a politician suggest such a thing. It is so absurd that I really hope we never have to discuss it seriously in Parliament.

    -MEP Lars Christian Engstrom (Sweden)

    The proposal claims to be based on users' rights and claims they are protected, that they should feel safe. He writes at the beginning that he did not want to create a new Big Brother Society. But then the whole document is about just that.

    -Former Piratbyran founder and current telecomix hactivist Marcin de Kaminski

    1. Re:Don't Worry by HopefulIntern · · Score: 2

      Nah, already other MEPs are pointing out how retarded both he and his idea are.

  5. Not Gonna Happen by stereoroid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like Members of Congress in the USA, EU MEPs come in all shapes, sizes, and states of sanity. This guy's just flying a kite, but any such law would apply the the MEPs too, and you can assume some of them have skeletons in their hard drives. Fuhgeddabouttit.

    --
    (this is not a .sig)
    1. Re:Not Gonna Happen by wvmarle · · Score: 2

      The fact that someone at that level can fly a kite like that, and get away with it, is worrisome enough to me.

  6. I bet.. by mvar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... EU MEP Tiziano Motti (Italy) can't tell the difference between desktop PCs, laptops, smartphones and e-readers. Like most of the politicians anyway. Six or seven years ago in Greece some morons (a.k.a. the parliament majority) voted for a law to prohibit electronic gambling - On their way, they made Internet Cafés illegal as well as coin-up arcade games. It was fun to watch the police bust into Internet Cafés and arrest their owners just because they had 5-6 desktops PCs connected to the Internet.

    1. Re:I bet.. by DZign · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Very true - half of the stupid proposals are just because mp's want to get their name out in the press and say 'look I did something this year'..
      Sometimes they either hardly know anything about the technology, or they are just so narrow minded that they don't consider it can apply to much more than they think of.

      The law was good for dealers in arcade machines/pinball machines who could suddenly get some good deals in Greece.. (you still can btw, just got a mail with someone from Greece offering me pinball machines for sale :-)

  7. When it is easier to molest for real than download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if this were not grossly misused(which would surely happen), with this in place the child molesters will figure out that actually molesting children is less likely to get them caught than child porn. Making an incentive to do it for real instead of looking at it...

  8. Misleading title !! by Zoxed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, this is Slashdot but 1 MEP suggests something, and it becomes "EU Debates Installing a Black Box On Your Computer". No one is debating anything !! (Unless TFA says more: it is currently Slashdotted.)

    1. Re:Misleading title !! by zixxt · · Score: 2

      OK, this is Slashdot but 1 MEP suggests something, and it becomes "EU Debates Installing a Black Box On Your Computer". No one is debating anything !! (Unless TFA says more: it is currently Slashdotted.)

      Its only takes one stupid idea to get a big enough following, especially with the "Think of the children" crowd and then boom its LAW!

      --
      ---- GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    2. Re:Misleading title !! by HopefulIntern · · Score: 3, Informative

      It doesn't. Like your assumption, it is one ignorant guy in need of some attention by suggesting a radical idea. The fact he had good support a while ago seems to suggest he is universally supported but they voices of other MEP's in response to his ludicrous proposition suggests otherwise. Nothing to worry about.

    3. Re:Misleading title !! by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, it isn't "one ignorant guy". It's at least two ignorant MEPs: from Italy and Anna Záborská from Slovakia. They co-authored the Written Declaration 29, where they state quite bluntly that they want every european citizen being constantly monitored by the police to avoid putting some hypothetical nasty criminal "on the same footing as honest citizens and making it difficult for the authorities to trace them".

      More on this in:

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    4. Re:Misleading title !! by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 2

      Correction: along with the two ignorant MEPs who authored Written Declaration 29, currently 371 MEPs have signed this proposition. Here is a list of all signatories.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
  9. Sure. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

    So if someone wants to research on the subject of child porn (not search for it, but search for information about it), and therefore enters that term into Google, he will cause an alarm at the police. Yeah, that makes perfectly sense. And of course they have the perfect algorithm to detect whether a photo shows an abused child. So it will never trigger if you e.g. send a holiday photo of your child at the beach to a friend.

    And of course, that box will never be used for any other purpose. Well, OK, they'll probably will soon add terrorist triggers, because terrorists are very bad, too. Don't complain about the police knocking on your door, you just shouldn't have used the word "terror" when you referred to the experience with your ex. Oh, and copyright violations for sure are also a target to be added soon. Oh, and since it is installed everywhere anyway, why not use it also for criminal investigations? And of course the secret service should have access to it. And it would surely come in handy for finding whistleblowers ...

    Ah, and if it's already there, why not add more functionality? Maybe not just report, but also block unwanted content? After all, it's bad stuff you want to be blocked. And of course it will never block legitimate but unwanted stuff ...

    And of course pedophiles, terrorists, copyright violators etc. won't ever find a way around it. Sure.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  10. Re:Salem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait, you are putting pedophiles in the same category as pagans, Jews, witches, anarchists, gays and communists. Terrorists, Christians and Muslims though...

  11. Won't someone think of the adults? by mykos · · Score: 2

    Children are sure going to hate life when they become adults and these black boxes were installed "for their protection" during a brief phase of their lives.

  12. The title is BS by ardor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Both this Slashdot story and TFA have a very misleading title. ONE MEP is thinking about this insane idea. It is not even in Parliament for discussion. Another MEP already vehemently spoke against it.

    Come on, ideas like these pop up and fizz out all the time. I bet there are other MEPs thinking about imprisoning gay people, reinstating a theocracy, establishing re-education centers, idolizing Hitler and Stalin, and so on and so forth. That doesn't mean any of these wacky ideas come through. There are no indications that this one will.

    Plus, it is not technically feasible, even with deep packet inspection. To connect the dots, to know who uploaded what where, is far from trivial, especially if the bad scary pedophile uses non-standard ways of transmitting this data. For example, what if he uses zip files? Also, there is encryption, which totally defeats this "logbox".

    --
    This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    1. Re:The title is BS by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 2

      I don't believe that's the case. According to this report, "So far, 324 MPs have signed the proposal, or the written declaration that it called on European languages". It also mentions that "When more than half, ie 369 members signed up, it can be adopted and thus becomes its official position, but are not legislative in themselves."

      So, although it isn't quite the same thing as signing a law, it is in fact a bit more than "one MEP thinking about this insane idea", even when including the fact hat Written Declaration 29 is authored by two MEPs, Tiziano MOTTI and Anna ZÁBORSKÁ.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
  13. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1984 is not a manual for politicians.
    Hitler is back, in Brussels,. But don't worry. What could possibly go wrong ?

    One out of over seven hundred MEPs, one out of over seven hundred members of a body with very little real power within the EU, one man says something technologically illiterate and Slashdot runs for the hills for fear of Blackshirts and deathcamps?

    Your post is absurd, absurd, hysterical and absurd. But thank you for keeping the world safe from totalitarianism. It's the thought (well, not thought, in this case... sentiment, perhaps) that counts....

    P.S. Never, under any circumstances, watch C-SPAN. Your terror will know no bounds.

  14. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

    Yes - you will, and Big Brother will be watching you.

    Don't forget that this can easily be changed to also take care of political opinions and just about everything.

    All while the criminals will find out that you can circumvent the filters one way or another.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  15. PARENTS rape children, NOT strangers by dbet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The people who actually molest kids are those with easy access to them. most cases of abuse are from moms, dads, stepmoms, aunts and uncles, sometimes even a teacher. They don't care if you monitor their computer because they don't need one to get what they're after. No amount of computer monitoring or demonizing things that are even tangentially related to kiddie porn will prevent or even slow down actual cases of actual abuse.

    These laws are about removing people from society who don't have a "healthy" sexual attitude. That's why drawings are illegal in many places. Because it's not about reducing abuse, it's about people making themselves feel less uncomfortable about their own sexuality. In my own country, the people here are absolutely bat shit crazy when it comes to sexuality. They fear it, and they hate people who have a different attitude about it than they do. My generation is the first where simply being gay is not a crime. Hell at this point I can see things at the beach that would be illegal on my computer. There have even been people investigated for looking at porn of adults who are young looking. And if you let yourself get wrapped up in this paranoia you are helping no one and hurting everyone, including yourself.

    And this needs to be said:

    I would rather live in a world where occasional child abuse happens, than one where it never happens because we're all under constant surveillance.

    1. Re:PARENTS rape children, NOT strangers by Lockyy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey, don't forget. Porn of small breasted women is illegal in Australia because it's counted as child pornography...

  16. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yep. Somebody needs to ask him why there aren't video cameras in politician's houses/offices so we can watch them and prevent corruption.

    Lead us by example!

    --
    No sig today...
  17. For the children, catch all by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Forgive me for being a bit rude, but I woke up to this article. Mr. Motti, considering the reputation your PM has been gathering I must say screw you.

    I am at the point I am no longer phased by the phrase "think of the children". All of this to protect kids? Dear god, at this point you might as well just take all the kids away from their parents in the hospital and raise them completely isolated from adults. Maybe even other kids so they don't even know what kids look like to be turned on by them.

    An image of a child being abused? I mean, obviously this guy has no clue about technology. Still, he did not research prior censorship attempts first? The whole Green Dam (or was it River) of China's blocking a website for showing too much skin was horribly broken. Should Europeans expect their equivalent of SWAT Teams to start charging in if they look up pig farming?

    And... and... *double face palms and sighs* Why the hell are politicians so apt to look at 1984 and like books as guides rather than warnings?

    --
    by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
  18. Re:Excuse my French, by Lockyy · · Score: 2

    "Excuse my french," is a saying that indicates "I'm going to/have just sworn, please don't get mad/offended." It isn't literal.

  19. E-Mail to Motti: tiziano.motti@europarl.europa.eu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just mailed this to tiziano.motti@europarl.europa.eu:

    Mr. Motti,

    we have been informed, that you proposed plans to install a system of total surveillance for purposes of creating a totalitarian police state in the spirit of Stalin. As a additional insult, you excuse this behavior with âoeprotecting the childrenâ, despite it being a proven fact that this system will not only not help children, but in fact harm everyone, including children.

    In case you are ignorant of that fact: This is a criminal offense in the EU. Committed against every single member of the union. One you would commit deliberately and knowingly. One that WILL land you in prison for a decade.

    Because of this, we leave you the choice to either back down and reconsider changing your world views, or face a legal process on a massive scale, ending with you in prison.

    It is your choice, but we WILL bring you down. And other than you, we will do it in a legal and morally acceptable way.

    And I mean it!
    How about you?

  20. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

    But what will we do when all the politicians are dead?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  21. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

    But what will we do when all the politicians are dead?

    There will be much rejoicing.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  22. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by iamhassi · · Score: 2

    You make no distinction between the 19 year old who went out and had sex with a 17 year old girl, and the rapist who likes to grab little boys and anally rape them?

    17? The age of consent where they're considering this black box, Italy, is 14

    "The age of consent in Italy is 14 years, with a close-in-age exception that allows those aged 13 to engage in sexual activity with partners who are less than 3 years older. The age of consent rises to 16 if one of the participants has some kind of influence on the other (e.g. teacher, tutor, adoptive parent)."

    Teachers can legally have sex with their 16 year old students. Wow, in the US you'd get 20 years for that.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  23. Re:Salem by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sure. It's only recently that pedophilia has been demonized. It was actually a custom in ancient Greece and Rome. Having been a victim of rape myself at age 5, I can't say I stand up for pedophilia. However when I see people accusing each other for non sexual images of children (like the old Coppertone ad, for example), cartoon images (like say, Lisa Simpson), or for statutory rape when say an 18 year old goes out with a 17 year old, I just have to shake my head and conclude that people are over-reacting and not sane. There's a difference between feeling sexual attraction for a 16 year old girl in a tight bikini and raping a 4 year old child. If people can't see this then they are not much better.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  24. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

    NO, because it will be a box attatched to/inside your computer that will log what you do on the Internet that the police can access when they suspect you of supporting the opposition party....I mean, of acessing kiddie porn (of course, we all know that the opposition party websites are havens for kiddie porn).

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  25. Re:And who's gonna pay for that? by Totenglocke · · Score: 2

    Ah yes, beautiful government, where two legal adults cannot legally have sex with each other without express permission from some old fat bastard hundreds or thousands of miles away....

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  26. History Repeats by tonyAG · · Score: 2

    Adolf Hitler, Mien Kampf:
    "The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people.
    As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children,
    the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."