Rendering Synthetic Objects Into Old Photographs
First time accepted submitter IDarkISwordI writes "A new abstract headed to SIGGRAPH Asia 2011 provides a method for rapid execution of computer graphics, synthesized into photographs with accurate lighting and physics based on limited input from a user and interpretation by their code." The results are impressive; hard to watch the video demo (on linked page) without boggling.
This is going to be very useful for real estate sales. No need to move furniture into an empty house for the pictures.
Especially getting the lighting and the shadows to fit the rest of the image.
... the next time someone wants to frame someone else for murder ;P
Why, yes! I AM new here.
Well, that pretty well wraps it up for anyone trying to prove anything supernatural or extra-terrestrial on earth. Who would ever believe any video evidence now?
Right at the end of the video. Now you can have a weeping angel moving through your very own lounge!
Obligatory XKCD
"The most dangerous enemy of a better solution is an existing codebase that is just good enough." -- Eric S. Raymond
Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any software available for download, only the research paper.
The release is delayed because the software is limited to only a few useful objects at the moment: Buddha Statue, Dragon Statue, Pool Table and Dead Hooker.
Or more appropriately... http://xk3d.xkcd.com/331/
http://s418.photobucket.com/albums/pp263/Ironic-Mike/?action=view¤t=X-WingonAircraftCarrier.jpg
This line is padding.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any software available for download, only the research paper.
The release is delayed because the software is limited to only a few useful objects at the moment: Buddha Statue, Dragon Statue, Pool Table and Dead Hooker.
But I need software that can *remove* dead hookers from photos! That's the problem with academia, totally disconnected with the needs of the real world.
The communists under Stalin were "fixing" photographs to remove undesirable people for a long time, many years before electronic computers and graphics were invented. Of course, the undesirable people were removed from real life as well...
Chaos maximizes locally around me.
...will have a field day with this. Please, someone keep him away from whatever _is_ left of the original Star Wars film!
Didn't someone once suggest that we refer to these techniques as lucassizing?
It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
No, no, no. No need for that.
Just add the dead hooker to a lot of photos, see, that's not a real dead hooker in my photo's, it's added with a computer, see, here is the president with the same dead hooker! Instead of trying to hide the proof, invalidate the proof.
So, peak oil arrives, there is a superflu pandemic, 99942 Apophis impacts and blocks out the Sun, etc. etc. we all die.
...then, centuries later, technological civilisation reemerges, and starts analysing data storage devices they dig up. Most of them are unreadable, but they do get fragments of data with which they can start to piece together what happened before The Event.
And what do they find? Pictures of people listening to iPods at the Battle of Stalingrad and Asimo raising the flag at Iwo Jima.
If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
Once we've also got the ability to render realistic 3D models of real people we're going to be in big trouble.
Given that this approach is able to account for light sources, geometry (perspective) and physical objects in an original image, it should also be able to remove objects and allow for realistic rendering of that loss. Combine that with the capability described in the proposal and the use of photographs as evidence at trial may soon be inadmissible. Or at the very least, a legal team could reasonably claim that a photo had been doctored (whether true or not) and therefore render such evidence unusable by the prosecution.
"I've never seen so many dead hookers in all my life!"
"Lord knows I have..."
"Coffee is for closers."