Computer-Controlled Cyborg Yeast
MrSeb writes "With a slightly weird world first, scientists have formed a feedback loop between common, baking and brewing yeast, and a computer. The computer can trigger the yeast to produce a protein, and the yeast then feeds back to the computer how much of the protein is being produced — the computer has exact control over the yeast's production. This work, performed by scientists at the Automatic Control Laboratory at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, is exceptional because of its simplicity: The computer turns the yeast on by flashing a red light, and it turns the yeast off by flashing a deeper red light. Connected to the yeast is a 'reporter' molecule that fluoresces when the protein is produced. The computer can see this fluorescence and alter the light it emits, thus creating a full feedback loop. The simplicity is significant because of the role of yeasts and bacteria in the production of antibiotics, biofuels, and more. The problem is controlling those organisms — so far, scientists have tried to genetically add synthetic control circuits, with limited success... and now the Swiss have shown that it can be done by simply shining a couple of lights."
... the zombie apocalypse.
Asshole! DON'T CLICK!
I need one of these lights... "Turn it on with a flash of red light, then turn if off with a flash of deeper red light"
This would work wonders... :)
I read your comment a second too late. It took me years to get that image out of my head, and now it is back !!!
there is nothing cyborg about this. and, i hope that the original scientists did not sell the work this way.
Don't click this either. Can someone flag this guy. Looks like he has two ids.
I, for one, welcome our new Swiss yeast overlords.
More awe-inspiringly, though — or perhaps more worryingly, if you’re a pessimist — the computer-yeast process is completely automated.
That computer-yeast is takin urrr jaaaaauuuubbbssss!
I think you meant: "This work, performed by MAD scientists at the Automatic Control Laboratory..."
You are a homo. Stop it
Goatse, don't click.
look forward to our new Computer-Controlled Cyborg Yeast overlords!
Yeah don't click that. link... ever.
Although I don't see the cyborg part, I, for one, welcome our new yeasty cyborg overlords!
eventually yeast that does not shut off due to the light will emerge, due to trial and error evolutionary process. Then you're SoL... well of course until you make new yeast which reacts to a different light, or use a stronger light.. but if you're going down that route why don't you just hire Monsanto and get it over with.
Wouldn't wanna get one from this sh1t.
there is nothing cyborg about this.
. . . yet . . .
"Oh, my God! The vat of yeast has formed into a giant yeast-hand, which is fiddling with the flashing red light control!"
Beware of the coming yeast infection . . .
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
The dark future would begin with the yeast-machine interface.
Like increasing or decreasing the strength of the Sun's output. I wonder who is controlling it.
The cyborg part of this- is that cyborg women can now get a cyborg yeast infection by shining a red light at them.
"That's the way to do it" - Punch
what if gets a yeast infection
could that yeast brew.
This sounds like a cool automation that might save many hours of dealing with growing-testing-discarding cycles in bio-labs. One gripe is about the repeated usage of 'computer' as the one doing it - giving the details about the sensors - photo/chemical - would be more informative to the technical folks at /.
A reversibly photoswitchable GFP-like protein with fluorescence excitation decoupled from switching
Of course, since it is in a Nature subjournal, you'll need to pay for it or find an institution to grab the full text from.
Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nbt.2018.html
A minor clarification to TFS: "The problem is controlling those organisms — so far, scientists have tried to genetically add synthetic control circuits, with limited success... and now the Swiss have shown that it can be done by simply shining a couple of lights."
The control circuit genes still have to be added synthetically (or at least added in conjunction with a suitable promoter sequence (in this case, Gal1 which has a binding site for Gal4 - part of the fusion construct responsible for the light activation). The fact is that there are several well documented transcription control mechanisms (lac operon, trp operon, arabinose promoter etc) that are currently used at the industrial scale for microbes. The lights are new, but since the reporter gene in this case (YFP) was being read using flow cytometry, this is very unlikely to be cheaper or easier to work with. Most of us will stick with good old IPTG for inducing gene expression in our microbes.
As I often write in my blog, I am a homebrewer. So, does this mean that we could create cyborg yeast to brew beer? Cyberbeer! You could control things like attenuation, flocculation, etc.It'd be really interesting to see the possibilities.
With the advent of Net Neutrality the consensus is that the ISP's aren't going to be able to block/filter any sort of traffic; bits are bits, bytes are bytes and the ISP's give no &#*$@ what it is. Their responsibility ends at delivery of the packet according to the respective customer's service level agreement. Do I necessarily love this law, not really....But i'm willing to bet these recording companies were all over it before they realized it's going to bite them on the ass. These ISP shouldn't have to spend their resources seeking out piracy sources on the web and filtering them out. If we're going to make it illegal for them to wield that power to their advantage then they shouldn't be made to be responsible for doing favors for the RIAA. Deal with it dog.
To begin with, this would just be a manufacturing boon, but it could easily end with computers growing new humans (or skinjobs?) from vats of stem cells.
Interesting technology. Interesting possibilities. Poor story.
Cyborg is short for "cybernetic organism".
Cybernetics is the communication/interface (and control systems) between living things and machines.
So... this really is a cybernetic organism.
You know you have read too much Sci Fi when:
You misread the headline of "Computer-Controlled Cyborg Yeast" as "Computer Controlled Cyborg Yeats" and start looking over your shoulder for the Shrike's 3rd cousin and the Shrubbery of annoyance.
Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
this will be excellent for home brewers... to start/stop fermentation at will...
looking forward to all the crazy microbrews this leads to.
Imagine if such proteins could be embedded into human cells. It would be amazing if you could implant cells that would release chemicals to fight cancer, or fight disease. Development of this technology could be the first step to engineering our bodies better than nature has done for us, say by releasing antibiotics automatically when light is shined on certain cells.
Also, imagine if you could embed cells or proteins that give you an orgasm when a red light is flashed on you. It would give a whole new meaning to "red light district."
Oh Good.
Another software patent.
This could be a big deal for biofuels. Biofuel companies already have organisms that produce fuels, but are having trouble scaling up the process because all the bugs die if anything is the slightest bit off.
I think this is more impressing: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=cyborg-beetles
but how do i make it a deeper red?
Wow. This has some implications for the craft/homebrew yeast companies. Control over reproduction rate and when it occurs at a more granular level... Although this can be controlled by providing food and adequate temperature, this may be something they could use. I'm thinking of these types of businesses:
http://www.wyeastlab.com/
http://www.whitelabs.com/
Oh, and Left Coast Represent!
Browse at 1. You'll thank me later.