Slashdot Mirror


French Power Company Fined For Hacking Greenpeace

judgecorp writes "Electricite de France (EDF) which uses nuclear reactors to generate the majority of France's electricity, has been found guilty of hacking into Greenpeace computers in 2006. EDF has been fined fined €1.5 million and ordered to pay Greenpeace a further half a million euros, for what the judge described as an act of 'industrial scale espionage.'"

11 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Re:Um, OK. by TheLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So far from my observation if a private individual hacks, the private individual risks going to prison.

    Whereas if a corporation does it there's no prison time involved for any of the people involved.

    I think prison time would discourage both private individuals and individuals acting on behalf of corporations.

    --
  3. Re:Um, OK. by Millennium · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What you describe is an unfair system: different parties play by different rules based on a factor of no relevance to the matter at hand.

    In a fair system, everyone plays by the same rules, and that's the type of system I'm talking about here.

  4. Re:Um, OK. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if corporations 'are people' then they should GO TO JAIL like people when caught breaking the law.

    it would be fun as hell to design what it means to be a corp 'in prison'. wouldn't it be fun?? imagine how we could stick it, back, to all the fucked up corps who have gotton away with bloody murder (or nearly so) over the years.

    the thing is, justice is owned by the state and the state is now owned by corps. don't expect ANY justice toward corps. not until after some revolution (...) comes, anyway.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  5. Re:And yet... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    quite OT but slightly humorous: if you are an adult and pay to have sex with an adult, that's a crime.

    EXCEPT when you are a corporation and are filming it. then its 100% perfectly legal.

    corps have more rights than people. they actually do.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  6. Re:Um, OK. by trum4n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But it's not fair to fine a citizen the same as a corporation. You could empty my bank accounts, and the corp wouldn't even notice that amount of money. So you can ruin a persons life, or fine a company effectively nothing, with the same dollar value. Fine me 10,000$, you better fine Exxon 25+ billion.

  7. Re:Well by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really?
    Okay I am no fan of Geenpeace at all. I do not think their tactics and often their goals are correct.
    However...
    EDF is a heavily regulated utility company that is responsible for the running of nuclear facilites. They should without a doubt be held to an extremely high standard when it comes to following laws and regulations.
    Greenpeace is a bunch of hippies that think they are doing good. Just as their is no room for Police officers and the military to be allowed to commit institutional acts of civil disobedience there can be no room for EDF to do the same.
    Plus I am sure that Greenpeace members have spent the night in jail in the past and will again.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  8. Re:a hefty bill? by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There was nothing wrong with what he said. He didn't say they were borrowing from the government, he said that they could borrow (from private banks) at government rates.

    The reason that governments get much lower rates is that they are very unlikely to default on their loans so there is much less risk and cost involved in loaning them money. That means that the interest rate they charge can be very low. If you can get the government credit "blanket" extended over you, then the banks can consider your loan to be just as safe as a government one and give you the same deal.

    So he was right, a loan guarantee is NOT a subsidy, unless there is a bankruptcy. It makes it less expensive to build a reactor, but that money does not come from the government. I was also loaned money for my education that was a federal student loan. Since the government was on the hook for the money, I got a low interest rate, but the government did not pay one cent for my education loans.

  9. Re:Um, OK. by Swanktastic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know this is Slashdot, but the French contributing to the success of the American Revolution was 100% done out of self-interest. The Bourbons loved democracy in the same way Americans loved radical Islam when we gave Afghanistan freedom fighters Stingers to shoot down Russian helicopters. And it came back and bit them in the tail in a much more dramatic and bloody way.

  10. Re:fine a Citizen by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aren't the citizens getting fined more than Corps?

    So "Industrial Espionage" is only worth a penalty of a million or two but Anonymous hackers are Terrorists for Life?

    Remember that Corporations are People? How did Corps manage to NOT get on the Terrorist Lists?!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  11. Re:Um, OK. by oobayly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Likewise, the US had no interest in becoming involved in WWII until Pearl Harbour (or at least until Hitler declared war on the USA four days later) - over 2 years since the start of the war in Europe. Don't get me wrong, I can see why, after the loss of 110,000 soldiers in WWI.

    It's common for some Americans to go on about how we'd all be speaking German if it wasn't for them, so I think it's only fair for them to be reminded that it's quite possible they'd still be speaking the Queen's English and drinking warm beer if it weren't for the French.

    Like Britain petitioning the USA to enter WWII, Benjamin Franklin actively petitioned for support in France in 1776 - the only difference was that the French covertly entered the American War of Independence before formally recognising the USA two years later - causing Britain to declare war on France.