Slashdot Mirror


Recreating a Mysterious, 2,100-Year-Old Clock

fergus07 writes "Swiss watchmaker Hublot has created a scaled-down working replica of the ancient Antikythera mechanism. The question is — why on Earth would you want to strap one of these to your wrist? It barely tells the time, and it can't take pictures, tweet or connect to your Facebook. In fact, very few people would have the faintest idea what it is, or why you'd want one at all. But for those that do recognize its intricate gears and dials, this tiny, complex piece of machinery tells a vivid and incredible tale of gigantic scientific upheaval, of adventure and shipwreck on the high seas, of war and death."

209 comments

  1. Rad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's pretty awesome. I kinda want one...

    1. Re:Rad! by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. Where can I get one?!?!

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
  2. vanity by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > why on Earth would you want to strap one of these to your wrist Because here on earth, we know vanity and use status symbols to impress?

    1. Re:vanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      From TFA/TFS:

      The question is — why on Earth would you want to strap one of these to your wrist? It barely tells the time, and it can't take pictures, tweet or connect to your Facebook.

      Because fuck you, some of us want to tell what fucking time it is without at least a 1GHz processor with 16GB of RAM, you smarmy Gizmag writer asshole, that's why.

    2. Re:vanity by swanzilla · · Score: 1

      From TFA/TFS:

      The question is — why on Earth would you want to strap one of these to your wrist? It barely tells the time, and it can't take pictures, tweet or connect to your Facebook.

      Because fuck you, some of us want to tell what fucking time it is without at least a 1GHz processor with 16GB of RAM, you smarmy Gizmag writer asshole, that's why.

      Well, keep looking. Said device doesn't do that whatsoever.

    3. Re:vanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up! I have no interest in a timekeeper that takes pictures, tweets, or connects to Facebook.
      My wristwatch is small, waterproof, and cheap--with no Apple tax or Android Dane-geld.
      Obviously, I don't want the Antikythera either.

    4. Re:vanity by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, yes it does...

      From TFA:

      Hublot's own working replica of the Antikythera mechanism, scaled down from shoebox size to wristwatch size, and with a built in clock circuit so it can tell the time as well as make its astronomical predictions.

    5. Re:vanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, my iphone isn't a very good phone either, so I guess we haven't progressed much in 2000 years.

    6. Re:vanity by capt.Hij · · Score: 1

      Obviously, I don't want the Antikythera either.

      Probably because it is not a clock? Not even the posters can be bothered to read the article anymore. *le sigh*

    7. Re:vanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yourself included? TFA says the designer of the wristwatch-sized version included a clock, so it can do that AND all of its original calculations.

    8. Re:vanity by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At any given moment, I can see the current time on:

      Office: desk phone, laptop, pc, wall clock, cell phone.
      Kitchen: wall phone, wall clock, microwave, stove, cell phone.
      Living room: cable box, DVD player, wall clock, cell phone.
      Bedroom: alarm clock, weather station, cell phone.
      Car: radio, satellite receiver, GPS, cell phone.

      So I can't figure out why anybody would wear a wrist watch, unless for fashion. And that makes even less sense.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    9. Re:vanity by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Same reason I wear McFlys.....

      http://www.back4thefuture.com/ I feel like I am superfly in these monkeys!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:vanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I can't figure out why anybody would carry a cell phone, unless for fashion. And that makes even less sense.

    11. Re:vanity by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Informative

      So I can't figure out why anybody would wear a wrist watch, unless for fashion. And that makes even less sense.

      Fashion is part of it. So I can tell time in meetings if there is no clock. Because it takes 2 seconds to look at my watch, and more to dig out my cell phone, so when I'm walking it comes in handy. Because there's something really beautiful about a mechanical watch with its gears exposed. Because you can get used to wearing a watch, and if you're not wearing one it can feel odd. Occasionally having an alarm comes in handy. Or a stopwatch.

      Just because it doesn't make any sense to you that doesn't mean that other people don't have reasons for wearing a watch.

      They also make more than one flavor of ice-cream, too.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:vanity by CrispyZorro · · Score: 2

      So I can't figure out why anybody would wear a wrist watch, unless for fashion. And that makes even less sense.

      Because some people do not spend their lives indoors. Have you ever tried to look at your cell phone while riding a bike? But hey, this is slashdot. You might be one of those cell phone holster guys.

    13. Re:vanity by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      There should be a clock in every conference room. Or, even better, a timer.

      If I can't see a clock, and don't feel like fishing the phone out of my pocket to look, I've got a pretty good idea how long it's been since the last time I looked at the time. Give or take a couple of minutes.

      Now, yes, a watch is cool. I like the ones with all the exposed gears and perfectly machined parts that I see in magazine ads. Especially the ones with diving or aeronautical readouts that I don't understand. But is the watch cool, or is it cool because it's being worn by Sir Richard Branson or John Travolta while standing in front of a Learjet? It probably wouldn't look that good on my wrist while I'm climbing out of my Dodge.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    14. Re:vanity by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Now, yes, a watch is cool. I like the ones with all the exposed gears and perfectly machined parts that I see in magazine ads. Especially the ones with diving or aeronautical readouts that I don't understand. But is the watch cool, or is it cool because it's being worn by Sir Richard Branson or John Travolta while standing in front of a Learjet? It probably wouldn't look that good on my wrist while I'm climbing out of my Dodge.

      Well, no ... you'll never be as cool as Travolta in front of a lear jet. ;-)

      I've got watches that can tell me the timing of the tides, the phase of the moon, current altitude and temperature ... watches with nothing but the time of day ... watches that have their innards exposed ... watches in a variety of bright colors ... solar watches ... automatic (self winding) watches ... watches that sync to the atomic clock signal.

      The watches I wear to work are different from the ones I wear casually. I can wear the dressier ones casually, but a bright red G-shock in a client meeting not so much.

      My wife has a bunch of brightly colored plastic (and really rugged) watches so she can match it with what she's wearing ... she doesn't wear any other jewelry, so it's her one fashion accessory.

      It's amazing how quickly you can go from have no watches to having quite a few ... especially if you use something like Amazon to track down good buys or watches you'd just not see in a retail outlet.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    15. Re:vanity by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      No, but I can tell the time by the angle of the sun in the sky and don't need to dig out my phone. Does that count?

    16. Re:vanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, first thing I thought when I saw it was "geez, I know a few steampunk fans who would be all over this thing."

      Honestly, I kind of like the more retro look and feel of clockwork mechanisms. Of course, I like jewelry too so this would be an upgrade in functionality for me.

    17. Re:vanity by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's odd, my $100 Motorola is the best phone I've owned, and I've had phones since the rotary days. Not only that, I can send and recieve emails and texts, surf the web, even watch YouTube on it.

      It's also the cheapest phone plan I've had. The AT&T monopoly was a PITA; extra charges for long distance (metered by the minute), you had to RENT the phone, it was terrible. The science fiction 21st century we live in is far less primitive than it used to be.

    18. Re:vanity by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the other hand, I can't figure out why anybody would carry a cell phone, unless for fashion.

      Dad? Is that you? When did you get a computer? I can't figure out why anyone would want a landline phone, all you can do with one is make and recieve calls, and it doesn't even work unless you're home. I don't have a landline. But my phone makes and recieves calls, texts, emails, accesses the internet, is a calandar, a calculator, a camera, a movie camera... it's a damned handy device to have.

      If you're not my 80 year old dad you must be trolling.

    19. Re:vanity by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Not even the posters can be bothered to read the article anymore.

      Hey, at least some of us read the articles we submit. It appears Soulskill read it as well, as he added to TFS in a meaningful way.

    20. Re:vanity by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's odd, my $100 Motorola is the best phone I've owned, and I've had phones since the rotary days.

      You young whippersnapper. I remember when you had to pick up the earpiece and tap the hanger a couple of times to get Madge's attention down at central and then you'd ask to be connected.

      And before that if you wanted to talk to someone at the other end of town you walked over and did it in person. Good for your health, less stress. You wanted to talk to someone in the next city over, you waited until they invented the telegraph and sent one of those newfangled things.

      Now get off my lawn.

    21. Re:vanity by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      That's okay. No one asked you why they should wear a wrist watch.

      No one asked me either, but here are a couple of reasons.
      Fashion. Yes, it's pathetic, but wearing a nice watch goes a long way when meeting with new clients. I don't have an expensive watch, I just have a nice looking one. It's huge too.
      TIME... I like to be able to tell time, accurately and quickly. You say you can spot the time in all these places, with different clocks at each. Are they synchronized? I doubt it. So at any given moment, you might be off by 10 minutes in any given direction. That's super useful. I take it you don't do anything time sensitive?
      Manners: Pulling out your cell phone to check the time is less than subtle. In some situations, it's downright rude. Some of us prefer not to be rude. I know, you probably aren't one of them.

    22. Re:vanity by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      So I can't figure out why anybody would wear a wrist watch, unless for fashion. And that makes even less sense.

      Possibly you live somewhere like California where it's either summer or spring, or you drive everywhere. I don't. My favourite wristwatch got stolen at Milan airport (by the security guards - fucking dago scum) and I thought the same as you. I got accustomed to using my phone as a pocket watch like in grandad's day. And then October came...

      Hitching up/undoing your greatcoat is a royal pain in the ass. Much easier to lift your sleeve/pull down your gauntlet.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:vanity by snakeplissken · · Score: 3, Funny

      wait until they invented the telegraph?

      i had to wait until horses evolved!

    24. Re:vanity by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Not when it's overcast. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    25. Re:vanity by Taty'sEyes · · Score: 1

      Ice breaker at a bar? Respect for precision ancient analog technology? It's pretty cool? I see no reason for my fiancee's diamond, but I promise you, it's needed. Smile

      --
      We show geeks how to get their dream girl at EyesOfOdessa.com
    26. Re:vanity by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it is nessacery to know what the time is when away from mod-cons and/or in an area controlled by other people (so even if there are clocks you don't know how accurate they are). So a timepeice that you carry on your person is useful.

      Sounds like you use the clock on your cellphone as a watch substitute which is fine as long as you remember to keep it charged and as long as you actually want to carry a phone all the time.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    27. Re:vanity by jtollefson · · Score: 1

      I wish that I had a mod-point for you. That was the most insightful comment I've seen on Slashdot all day.

  3. *eyeroll* by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it can't take pictures, tweet or connect to your Facebook.

    Because THAT'S what's important in a watch.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:*eyeroll* by Sardak · · Score: 2

      Well, how else are you to let your thousands of "friends" know that you checked your watch?

    2. Re:*eyeroll* by Abstrackt · · Score: 5, Funny

      My solution is just to loudly yell every action as I take it.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:*eyeroll* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so your Mom can hear you. What about your friends?

    4. Re:*eyeroll* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about your friends?

      he just rolls over and whispers to your mom

  4. Ad for Fossil watches by lauterm · · Score: 2

    The ad I see at the top of the page is for Fossil watches. ;-)

    1. Re:Ad for Fossil watches by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      They made some cool PDA-watches that ran PalmOS in the early 2000s. I thought about buying one, but I can never come up with a good use for a computer with a screen literally the size of a postage stamp, while I'm already carrying a regular-sized PDA around...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Ad for Fossil watches by zerro · · Score: 1

      apropos

    3. Re:Ad for Fossil watches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not an Apple fan, but I really dig these.

    4. Re:Ad for Fossil watches by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      I had one. It was the coolest thing I owned for a while. Looked ridiculous on my wrist though. I probably still have it somewhere in a box...

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  5. Well... by esocid · · Score: 2

    Because you can. Obviously.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  6. Re:This has been done before by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yep this is far from the first replica, but it's the first one I've seen made so tiny.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  7. Antikythera in Lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
  8. I want one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because it is totally fucking awesome!

  9. Amazing by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's amazing in one respect, and sad in another. The Late Classical Greeks came so close to their own scientific revolution. If it hadn't been for the near culturally fatal effects of the Peloponnesian War, the Greeks may very well have invented science themselves. Can you imagine where we would be now if scientific methodology had fully blossomed 2,300 years ago?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Amazing by identity0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They invented this watch, unfortunately they patented it and drove all competitors out of business before collapsing themselves ;-)

      Thankfully, 2,100 years later their patents and copyrights have expired, so we can open-source it.

      Assuming, of course, Hublot hasn't patented it themselves.

    2. Re:Amazing by alexgieg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Way past the distant memory of peak oil and even "post oil"? Not to mention peak- and post- almost everything else industrially useful.

      But that's an incorrect historical take on the matter. To blossom a contemporaneous-like science requires, among other things, an extremely solid logical and mathematical foundation, way past what had been developed back in Ancient Greece, plus a very specific kind of world view that only developed once, under a very specific historical context. The first two aspects were advanced to the point of usefulness only during the three later centuries of (what we now call) the Middle Ages, while the third aspect required two more centuries, building upon the first two aspects. These three simply weren't available at the time.

      What doesn't mean considering the possibility isn't fun. There are some quite nice alternate history fiction on the subject out there.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    3. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to complain that that society felt it was ok to live on the work of slaves. but then I remembered what the world was like when the industrial revolution did take place (i.e. the christian church and its inquisition, plus implied slavery of anyone that couldn't fight back), and I calmed down.
      to be honest, I assume human history would be more or less the same, except for the temporal displacement. american and australian natives would still have been nearly wiped out.

    4. Re:Amazing by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The planets would be named Hermes, Aphrodite, Gaia, Ares, Zeus, Cronus, Caelus, Poseidon, and Hades. Not much else would be different, because the Greek empire would have devolved into barbarity just like the roman empire did.

    5. Re:Amazing by JoshuaZ · · Score: 2

      The Peloponnesian War was not the only thing that was relevant. Keep in mind that Thales was of all the ancient Greek thinkers very arguably the one who was closest to the scientific method (in terms of combining both empirical observation and rational thinking). And Thales was one of the first. So whatever prevented a scientific revolution it was probably more subtle than that.

    6. Re:Amazing by InfiniteZero · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well the Peloponnesian War predates this clock by about 300 years...

      But the ancient Greeks indeed came so close to the scientific and industrial revolution that it makes a fascinating fiction of alternative history. For example they even had working steam engine and railway around the same time period of the clock:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeolipile
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diolkos

    7. Re:Amazing by ks*nut · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What's amazing to me is that we have achieved so much in the area of scientific discovery and we're still pushing to see how far we can go until the home planet makes an "adjustment." Compared to some other species we've been here less than a blink of an eye in cosmic time and yet we've done a splendid job of fouling the nest. And the dark ages wouldn't have been quite so dark if "The Church" hadn't insisted on things like Galileo being wrong about heliocentrism until nine years ago.

    8. Re:Amazing by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Greeks would have known millenia ago that Hades is not a planet!

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    9. Re:Amazing by badran · · Score: 1

      It would be amazing if they can get a patent on that.

    10. Re:Amazing by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Roman society was born from and thrived upon 'barbarity' (an ironic description considering it is a term whose Latin etymological origin meant persons/cultures who were not Roman). It was not a devolution, it was the impetus and drive of the culture which led it to a leadership role throughout the Mediterranean world. This cold pragmatism led to things like the rape of the Sabines (which was not some aberrant exception to Roman behavior, marriage rites in the earliest Roman society included ritualized kidnapping and 'free prostitution' {citation: Otto Kiefer's Sexual Life in Ancient Rome, which is not in front of me at the moment so I can't give you a page number}). In order for Rome to achieve and maintain its success it had to actively fight against human rights and equality. It fought several wars against its slaves (the Servile Wars), ruthlessly put down several populist movements (the brothers Gracchus among many, most of which probably had anti-populist ulterior motives in the end anyway), and would decimate any population in revolt.

      Rome fell not because it was brutal (as it always had been), but because it ceased to be. It had built an empire upon exceptionalism and an inhumane disregard for any opposition, and this simply could not be translated to fit the mindset of the early church as it was instituted as the state religion. It would not be until the Crusades that the clergy would succeed in bastardizing Christianity enough that it could be used as an excuse for further military brutality.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    11. Re:Amazing by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the dark ages wouldn't have been quite so dark if "The Church" hadn't insisted on things like Galileo being wrong about heliocentrism until nine years ago.

      Historians no longer use the term "Dark Ages" and haven't for decades. Late antiquity and the early medieval era was considerably more complicated than that oversimplification. Also, blaming Christianity for societal collapse in the Western Roman Empire ignores the fact that the Eastern Roman Empire went on for another thousand years, and if anything, it had an even greater bond between church and state.

    12. Re:Amazing by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      It would be amazing if they can get a patent on that.

      True. Prior art of 2100 years might be a small hurdle.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    13. Re:Amazing by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Slavery is another reason. There was no need to automate because they had slaves. It was a double-edged sword: slaves freed-up enough people to ponder the universe, but it also meant less value in automation. Greeks excelled at "thought science", but not so much at empirical science that required rolling up your sleeves.

    14. Re:Amazing by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      The world might have eventually ended up with a pan Greco-Mayan-Oriental culture going to the moon in the 1500s. Terrence McKenna describes such an imaginative sequence of events:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRC4GboGAno

    15. Re:Amazing by bodland · · Score: 2

      Yes and thankfully the rise of Christianity's mysticism in the western world...that pretty much guaranteed a large portion of humanity would maintain a firm distrust of science...to this day.

    16. Re:Amazing by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Nothing would have happened.

      They needed all the modern tools such as heavy slave labor and better knowledge of metals such as aluminum, titanium, or even high carbon steel. Science achieved on the back of regular people that figured things out. The first high carbon steel swords were not made by scientists that were thinking about it. they were made by a uneducated swordsmith who had worked in a dirty forge for all his life.

      Science rides on the backs of the common man.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:Amazing by linuxwolf69 · · Score: 2

      But.. but... but... they added a WATCH! So of course they should get the patent

      [/sarcasm]

    18. Re:Amazing by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Empire was already in serious decline by the time of the Edict of Milan. You can't really blame Christianity for Rome's failure. A modern understanding reveals that Rome was thumped by the first major wave of invaders out of the Asian Steppe. The economic dislocation, which came before the outright physical disruption (ie. the Huns) were too much for the Roman economy to bear. This was an Empire basically kept together through massive military spending, and thus the underlying economy had to be strong, but as that was shaken, Rome basically entered an age of reaction, rather than action, and blow after blow took it out down. Everything Rome did from that point on; Diocletian's reforms, debasement of the currency, conversion to Christianity, the filling of the Legions with German tribesmen of dubious loyalty, all amounted to stop-gate measures.

      Not that I'm defending Christianity, being an atheist myself, but I just find blaming Christianity for the failure is really a matter of putting the cart before the horse.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    19. Re:Amazing by DigitalGoetz · · Score: 2

      I totally agree. My grandfather was farming in his field one day when he found some TCP/IP protocol seeds. Then a wily, young travelling salesman named Albertius Gohr came around and stole them. They never found out what happened to those seeds or where that nefarious vagabond vanished to. I suppose we'll never know. Just imagine what could have been grown from those seeds!

    20. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You might be surprised at the mathematical and logical complexity of ancient Greek thought. The logic gets more press (cf. Aristotle), and the math was sometimes looked down upon as un-philosophic and overly technical, but that doesn't mean that people weren't working on it. Archimedes, for one, is known to have asked complicated questions, and Eratosthenes has not only a prime number algorithm named after him but also managed to invent ways to measure the size of the earth. The rudiments of algebra are already in place in the Greek world, albeit not developed to what you'd find in Western Europe during the Enlightenment, and there's no knowledge of calculus, but there was room for a lot of scientific development that didn't happen. As for the world view of science, I don't see what's so specific about it: the notion that cause-effect relationships are observable is available in Epicurean poetry, and I'm not sure what else you have in mind that was available to early modern science but not to other cultures outside a narrow range of centuries in part of the West. What world view do you have in mind?

    21. Re:Amazing by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Well, the collapse of the Western Empire directly was related to the Germanic tribes (that's right, it was the goddamn Germans as usual), but indirectly the German tribes themselves were being forced by forces deeper into Eurasia; the various tribes of the Asian Steppes who, by the time they were done, had transformed, seized or destroyed a good many of the civilizations of Late Antiquity. The Eastern Empire survived the first waves of barbarian, and might even have survived the Turkic invaders, if it hadn't been for the brutality of the Italian city states in the sacking of Constantinople.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    22. Re:Amazing by heikkile · · Score: 1

      The first high carbon steel swords were not made by scientists that were thinking about it. they were made by a uneducated swordsmith who had worked in a dirty forge for all his life.

      More likely, for three or four generations, if not more.

      --

      In Murphy We Turst

    23. Re:Amazing by mister_dave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not true. The church sponsored scientific discovery. In a world created by God, the laws of nature are God's laws, and worthy of study.

      The adjective 'medieval' is now a synonym for superstition and ignorance. Yet without the work of medieval scholars there could have been no Galileo, no Newton and no Scientific Revolution. In "God's Philosophers", James Hannam traces the neglected roots of modern science in the medieval world. He debunks many of the myths about the Middle Ages, showing that medieval people did not think the earth was flat, nor did Columbus 'prove' that it is a sphere. Contrary to common belief, the Inquisition burnt nobody for their science, nor was Copernicus afraid of persecution. No Pope tried to ban human dissection or the number zero. On the contrary, as Hannam reveals, the Middle Ages gave rise to staggering achievements in both science and technology: for instance, spectacles and the mechanical clock were both invented in thirteenth-century Europe. Ideas from the Far East, like printing, gunpowder and the compass, were taken further by Europeans than the Chinese had imagined possible. The compass helped Columbus to discover the New World in 1492 while printing allowed an incredible 20 million books to be produced in the first 50 years after Gutenberg published his Bible in 1455. And Hannam argues that scientific progress was often made thanks to, rather than in spite of, the influence of Christianity. Charting an epic journey through six centuries of history, "God's Philosophers" brings back to light the discoveries of neglected geniuses like John Buridan, Nicole Oresme and Thomas Bradwardine, as well as putting into context the contributions of more familiar figures like Roger Bacon, William of Ockham and St Thomas Aquinas. Besides being a thrilling history of a period of surprising invention and innovation, "God's Philosophers" reveals the debt modern science and technology owe to the supposedly 'dark' ages of medieval Europe.

      http://www.amazon.co.uk/Gods-Philosophers-Medieval-Foundations-Science/dp/1848311508/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1321560353&sr=1-1

      http://jameshannam.com/

    24. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, Electric Turtle - the word *barbaros* is Greek, and basically means "people who talk funny [i.e., not like us]." *Barbarus* is a Latin transliteration.

    25. Re:Amazing by Max_W · · Score: 2

      This worker could have well be a curious weekend scientist. Talent is born in about the same rate among all layers of society.

      He could find books in a monastery. And it is not unimaginable a that he could learn to read from someone.

    26. Re:Amazing by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1
      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    27. Re:Amazing by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      When it was used in Latin the meaning was contextualized to Roman culture. I will admit that I gave the wrong impression by using the word 'origin'.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    28. Re:Amazing by Luyseyal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Another commentator mentioned the economic aspect. I won't repeat what s/he said but I did want to add that the Roman economy was largely predicated on conquering territories to generate tax revenue. Why? Because the Senate had voted to exempt themselves from all taxation. As they gained more and more land, it generated less money for the treasury necessitating conquering more people.

      -l

      P.s., I don't have a citation right now.

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    29. Re:Amazing by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      It's the Greek equivalent of "goy".

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    30. Re:Amazing by Paracelcus · · Score: 2

      You are mistaken, they did have a "scientific revolution" the Greek world extended beyond Greece, look into the extended sphere of Greek culture, I would suggest that Syracuse on the Island of Sicily Alexandria in Egypt and all of the extended influence of Hellenism well into Roman times and it was the heavy hand of Roman bureaucratic interference and Stoic philosophy that finally brought it to a standstill!

      The things we know about are too numerous to put here, the number we have never even heard about are probably even more amazing, remember that the loss of mankind's greatest legacy of wisdom and knowledge happened when the mob burned the great library at Alexandria.

      It wasn't until the nineteenth century that we even began to equal what was lost.

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    31. Re:Amazing by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me strikingly of another country in more modern times...

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    32. Re:Amazing by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Well yes... But any scientist who found proof of something against God's laws was generally killed as a heretic. Such as the earth going around the sun...

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    33. Re:Amazing by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      So does the fact that there were seeds mean that there are wild TCP/IP protocols growing out there in the world? Simply amazing. And they wonder where all these strange botnet viruses are coming from... I bet here in America we got the genetically modified version from Bell Labs too.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    34. Re:Amazing by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The Greeks were a brilliant lot, but they did not possess science as we know it. To clarify, what I mean is methodological naturalism. That didn't really come into existence until the Renaissance, and didn't begin to blossom as a new way of looking at the world until the Enlightenment. Classical Greek thought was most certainly one of the chief antecedents, and the wide distribution of the writings and essays on great Greek thinkers, particularly in the late Middle Ages greatly spurred this revolution, but science in the most formalized definition did not exist prior to that.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    35. Re:Amazing by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Edict of Milan neither established Christianity as the state religion nor did a mark a turning point in the empire's status. The demarcation comes when Theodosius I establishes Christianity as the religion of the state, and by the way, the borders of the empire from Diocletian to Theodosius I are largely the same. It is, in fact, only after Theodosius and the sea change in Roman civic life with regard to religion that the empire itself begins to shrink. Cases can be made for systemic weakness at just about any time in Rome's history.

      You also have your history quite backward. The Huns were not an active pressure upon Rome until after its Christianization. When the Edict of Milan granted religious tolerance (not establishment), the Hunic Empire didn't even exist. By Theodosius I's time, it had barely managed to tame it's barbarian neighbors and still posed no direct threat to Rome. That came much later.

      So while there's a certain argument for correlation doesn't equal causation, the real decline of the empire did occur *after* the Christianization. Lots of seeds were sewn before then, both systemically and by some very poor decisions. As an example of the latter, the carrot of Romanization, Roman citizenship, was devalued to nothing by a double blow under Caracalla. First, it was made universal to all free men in the territories. Second, Caracalla got butthurt by the Alexandrians' mockery of him and order thousands of them slaughtered, which, if they were now truly full Roman citizens, inexcusably violated the basic tenet that no Roman citizen could be executed without trial. Roman citizenship was no longer something anybody had to seek, nor was it anything somebody would want.

      Rome could have persisted through the barbarians' rise if it would have worked with them instead of being delusional about its superiority. Alaric I who sacked Rome was in fact part of Theodosius' legions (what a coincidence, the emperor who established Christianity...), and was a mercenary for Rome until Honorius betrayed him and his Roman handler Flavius Stilicho. Because Rome broke its promise to pay Alaric and his men, and purged many mercenaries and their families whose survivors clamored to Alaric to lead them in revenge, he did so. If Rome had given the deference Alaric had asked for and not persecuted other foederati, the Western Roman Empire might have been stable enough to resist the Hunic hordes. Hypothetically.

      Either way, the important point hear is that you have your history very backwards. The most significant pressures from barbarians and the Huns specifically undeniably followed, not preceded, the establishment of Christianity within the Roman Empire.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    36. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roman society was born from and thrived upon 'barbarity' (an ironic description considering it is a term whose Latin etymological origin meant persons/cultures who were not Roman).

      Tell us more about the Latin etymology of a Greek word, oh educated man.

    37. Re:Amazing by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      And if they can put it on the internet, then it's a slam-dunk!

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    38. Re:Amazing by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "invented science"? I find that statement to be unmeaningful.

    39. Re:Amazing by swb · · Score: 2

      IIRC, it was worse than just tax revenues.

      Conquered land was what was given to soldiers as their payment. So you needed an army to conquer land, so you conquered the land and gave it to the soldiers. Now you have more land to guard, so you need a bigger army, so you need to conquer more land, so you can give it to the soldiers, and now you have more land to guard...

      Economic expansion was built on conquering foreign lands, and Europe west of Rhine is a limited amount of room, even by horse-and-cart standards, so you kind of have a cap on your expansion room. Africa was kind of limited by the Sahara, and the steppes of Asia weren't a great place for Roman heavy infantry to succeed.

      So with some kind of a limit on expansion, both in terms of geography and resources (manpower), you have something of a limit on the economy. Through in a healthy dose of corruption, an unhealthy dependence on barbarian legions & merceneries guarding your frontier, and a political system that has no good rules succession, and well, you kind of end up with the empire falling apart.

    40. Re:Amazing by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      (an ironic description considering it is a term whose Latin etymological origin meant persons/cultures who were not Roman

      You mean greek. The term originates from Greek, and was a term for anyone who was not themselves Greek. The Romans WERE barbarians.

      IIRC, the term referred to the way other's speech sounded to the greeks-- "barbar".

    41. Re:Amazing by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Quiet you, this is religion bashing time. No time for "rationality" and "levelheadedness".

    42. Re:Amazing by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      I have addressed this already to one of the ACs, but since it has been brought up over and over... When the word was in use in Latin it was contextualized to Roman-centrism, just as it would later be contextualized to later Western civilizations. I misspoke when I used the word 'origin', but Latin and the word's use therein is nonetheless part of the etymological history of the word.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    43. Re:Amazing by mister_dave · · Score: 1

      That was not against God's laws. Copernicus believed he was revealing God's law, displacing a false hypothesis.

      Pope Clement VII (r. 1523–1534) had reacted favorably to a talk about Copernicus's theories, rewarding the speaker with a rare manuscript. There is no indication of how Pope Paul III, to whom On the Revolutions was dedicated reacted; however, a trusted advisor, Bartolomeo Spina of Pisa (1474–1546) intended to condemn it but fell ill and died before his plan was carried out (see Rosen, 1975). Thus, in 1600 there was no official Catholic position on the Copernican system, and it was certainly not a heresy. When Giordano Bruno (1548–1600) was burned at the stake as a heretic, it had nothing to do with his writings in support of Copernican cosmology, and this is clearly shown in Finocchiaro's reconstruction of the accusations against Bruno (see also Blumenberg's part 3, chapter 5, titled “Not a Martyr for Copernicanism: Giordano Bruno”).

      http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/copernicus/

      http://jameshannam.com/copernicus.htm

    44. Re:Amazing by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      This is an idiotic viewpoint. First, you are start out with the perfect valid point that material sciences would need to leap a few thousand years. That's reasonable, true, and a good point. Then you go on to say this is impossible using the scientific method, because in fact the "first" material scientists were not scientists. They were guys that worked with metal all day ever day... hey wait a minute...and kept trying new things...hey!... and invented new materials and processes...

      You really want to stick with that?

    45. Re:Amazing by Savantissimo · · Score: 2

      "there's no knowledge of calculus"
      Archimedes was actually very close to inventing integral calculus. He calculated areas, volumes and centers of mass using limits.

      The biggest thing missing from ancient math was the positional notation system using zero. The next biggest was the printing press.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    46. Re:Amazing by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Giving soldiers land, while not sustainable beyond an impetus, in fact had a stabilizing effect on the Roman Republic and the early empire. The problem was really that in later campaigns the earlier convention was reversed. The now-landed lower classes were conscripted to military service, and after serving in the legions they would come home to find they didn't have one any more. Wealthy Roman patrons would use their power and influence to illegally seize and consolidate the land of lower class Romans who were away in service. This greatly destabilized the economy on the lower side, and the now-landless farmers became a drag on society.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    47. Re:Amazing by mister_dave · · Score: 1

      Your pardon Lord. I forgot my place, and spoke heresy. :-)

    48. Re:Amazing by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      I'd say it was the last one (no printing press) that is the main reason for the failure of Greece to spawn a Scientific Revolution.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    49. Re:Amazing by biodata · · Score: 1

      The church supported a lot of the early scientific endeavour in western Europe. Mendel was a monk, and Darwin trained in theology. Science was the province of the wealthy, and the church had most of the wealth. A real alternative vision would be to look at what might have happened if we had not invaded the middle east in the crusades and clamped down on Islam. Those guys were way ahead of us in scientific terms, and so much of value was lost.

      --
      Korma: Good
    50. Re:Amazing by mister_dave · · Score: 1

      European crusaders made very small inroads into North Africa. They are in no way responsible for the lack of scientific progress in areas outside of Europe.

    51. Re:Amazing by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      It would be helpful if you had read about the mathematics of Aristarchus of Samos, and the pure scientific method it represents! Go ahead, try to wiggle out of that one!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  10. I love the bit of snark in the article by jandrese · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was such a technological leap that no doubt the "History" channel has already run a series of "documentaries" showing how it was built by aliens.

    It's funny because its true.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  11. Lego Version by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1, Interesting
    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Lego Version by gknoy · · Score: 2

      That was inspiring and cool. I can't wait until I can let my son near something like that and have him be interested in more than destroying it. :)

    2. Re:Lego Version by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      If he's anything like I was when I was a kid, he'd take it apart to try to see how it worked... and completely ruin it in the process.

    3. Re:Lego Version by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      If he's anything like I was when I was a kid, he'd take it apart to try to see how it worked... and completely ruin it in the process.

      That's the beauty of it. :)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  12. Who cares if it... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 0

    Who cares if it can't take photos or connect to facebook.

    It sill has enough wait to make a pig disgruntled if you throw it at one.

    That's how the ancients used to play angry birds.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Who cares if it... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 0

      ughhh,

      GrammEr nazis will have a field day with that post! :(

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Who cares if it... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Wait, did you mean weight?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Who cares if it... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Ever make a pig wait? it gets very disgruntled.

      And since time flies, his sentence makes perfect sense.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Who cares if it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was clever. Clock:wait......get it?

    5. Re:Who cares if it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose this may be a newer version of angry birds.

    6. Re:Who cares if it... by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      And since time flies, his sentence makes perfect sense.

      You know, I always had trouble with the phrase "time flies when you're having fun". If I'm having fun, why would I want to time flies?

    7. Re:Who cares if it... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It sill has enough wait to make a pig disgruntled if you throw it at one.

      Yep, 2100 years is a pretty heavy wait.

  13. Re:This has been done before by DrgnDancer · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article mentions this, and has a link to it. Replicating the device is not the achievement, doing so it such a small package is. They also threw in a few extra gears so it can tell time in addition to everything else.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  14. What I'd like to see by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    is a kit to build a working replica of the mechanism.

  15. RepRap Map needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it can be done in LEGO, surely we can create the RepRap CAD files to make one?

    1. Re:RepRap Map needed by Mr.+Protocol · · Score: 1

      I wonder if anyone's done an Antikythera mechanism in Minecraft?

  16. Oh noes a watch without a camera we're all doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It barely tells the time, and it can't take pictures, tweet or connect to your Facebook

    So? It's a watch, not a camera or a PC. Many people use watches, you know? It's much more practical than a cell phone, and if it's self-winding you don't have to worry about the battery.

    It is truly a shame Ancient Greece was destroyed, we'd probably have spaceships piloted by nude dudes if they were still around.

  17. You can't have one by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 5, Informative

    Per TFA:

    The watch is a concept piece only, and will be presented at the Baselworld watch show in 2012.

    Maybe if enough people begged, they might make a production run.

    I wouldn't mind having one, but I'm not holding my breath.

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
    1. Re:You can't have one by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      You do know this watch would not cost under 5 digits right? I wouldn't be surprised if they charged $30k for it.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:You can't have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What are you? Part of the 99%?

    3. Re:You can't have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are lots of ridiculously expensive watches in the world. None are this awesome.

    4. Re:You can't have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're off by about two orders of magnitude. Check the price of the much less complicated Patek Celestial. Hublot sells watches for six digits that only tell the time.

    5. Re:You can't have one by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Oh holy shit 8-(

      And I thought the $30k watches were crazy...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:You can't have one by Abstrackt · · Score: 2

      There's one thing about that watch that really bothers me: it's only water resistant to 25M (~82ft). If you're going to try selling me a watch that costs more than I make in a year I'd better be able to drop that fucking thing in a volcano before it breaks.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    7. Re:You can't have one by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The one I'm wearing now is water resistant to 50M and my less-formal watch is water resistant to 200M and also shock resistant, and it tells me the time and date with nice big letters and has an EL backlight. Together they're less than $200.

      Fools and their money...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:You can't have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only foolish if you can't afford it. Those watches are for people who already have garages full of exotic cars in their fabulous houses filled with stuff that interior designers picked out that they may have never even seen, that they travel to on their own planes or yachts, etc... a quarter million dollar watch, why the hell not?

    9. Re:You can't have one by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      Haha awesome -- and they only provide a 2 year warranty. You would think that for 6 figures they could eke out a lifetime warranty...

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    10. Re:You can't have one by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      It's only foolish if you can't afford it.

      It's only foolish if you buy something without considering whether it it has value to you. Even if I had a quarter of a million burning a hole in my pocket it would still be foolish for me to buy such a watch because it doesn't have the features I want. It would be just as foolish for me to spend ten dollars on a Justin Bieber CD because that doesn't have any value to me either.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    11. Re:You can't have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One does not simply walk to Sammath Naur !!!

  18. Re:This has been done before by rrossman2 · · Score: 2

    and had you read the article you'd know they even mention the lego one in it

  19. aw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Apple rushes to patent the antikythera mechanism*

  20. Because you can by djl4570 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "why on Earth would you want to strap one of these to your wrist?" Because it's twenty percent cooler than a Rolex.

    1. Re:Because you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      EVERYTHING is cooler than a rolex. Rolex is worn by douches who likes to show off. Someone wise once said the only thing worse than a fake rolex is a real one. Calling this 20% cooler than a rolex is actually an insult.

    2. Re:Because you can by orionop · · Score: 1

      But would rainbow dash wear one?

  21. Obligatory meme butcher by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    The ad I see at the top of the page is for Fossil watches. ;-)

    Mother******* Adsense spots, how do they work?

    (in other words, in order to read an article about a fancy watch and NOT seen an ad for a watch or watch-related service, you would need to be living in 1998.)

    1. Re:Obligatory meme butcher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are many, many brands of fancy watches in the world. The fact that the article on rebuilding an ancient clockwork device has an ad is for a Fossil watch is neat.

    2. Re:Obligatory meme butcher by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      in order to read an article about a fancy watch and NOT see an ad for a watch or watch-related service, you would need to be living in 1998.

      Or be living after 2005...

      https://www.google.com/search?q=adblock

      Or, have the slashdot "disable ads" option available and checked...

      I liked the Juggalo reference.

    3. Re:Obligatory meme butcher by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      I modify my hosts file directly. I don't need extra shit using resources.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    4. Re:Obligatory meme butcher by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Funny

      The ad I see at the top of the page is for Fossil watches. ;-)

      Mother******* Adsense spots, how do they work?

      Actually, they use a complicated system of 84 gears ...

    5. Re:Obligatory meme butcher by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      I modify my hosts file directly. I don't need extra shit using resources.

      I let Adblock do the work for me, even if it does use a few more computing resources. My computer has a lot more spare time than I do...

    6. Re:Obligatory meme butcher by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      hah, im a juggalo and i had to go back to GP and see what you were talkin about

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    7. Re:Obligatory meme butcher by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      APK has an account now?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  22. Why on Earth would you want to strap one of these by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

    to your wrist?

    It's obvious! So that you're ready for when the evil Kythera Mechanism shows up!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  23. Shame on the Author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have to ask "Why?" when talking about this project, I pity your lack of intelligence and creativity.

    1. Re:Shame on the Author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the f*kin "like" button??? That's the best comment in this thread yet.

  24. Re:Lawsuit Coming by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    You know, it's always assumed that the Antikythera mechanism's housing looked something like this:

    http://images.gizmag.com/inline/hublot-antikythera-mechanism-first-computer-watch-14.png

    But who says the corners couldn't have been rounded?

    The ancient Greeks will have some serious royalties to cough up after all this time...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  25. Re:Oh noes a watch without a camera we're all doom by squidflakes · · Score: 2

    Are you mad?!?! You like the idea of naked oiled youths zipping through the aether in astervarka, possibly meeting psychic aliens and bringing them home?

    Do you really want to meet the nude dude with the Ood?

  26. Re:Lawsuit Coming by Freelancealchemy · · Score: 1

    Expect Apple to be suing them for patent, look & feel, trade dress, and anything else they can think of any time now.

    Prior Art? What Prior Art?

    Especially with: "Turning a single input knob.."

    Yea, no wonder Greece is financially dead.

  27. A lot of nerds don't get horology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A lot of nerds simply don't get horology. They'll consider hand-crafted masterpieces as "junk" that your el-cheapo thinkgeek-powered watch renders useless...

    But not all nerds are like that: quite some of them also recognize true craftmanship and fine horology when they see some. I do certainly see the appeal of such a watch for people into pure mechanical watches...

    1. Re:A lot of nerds don't get horology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Patriot missiles ability to function declined over time because it is very difficult to to keep accurate analogue time in decimal format meaning the longer you did not reset the more inaccurate it got. A lot of nerds simply don't get horology.

    2. Re:A lot of nerds don't get horology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Stop saying "horology". It sounds like the study of whores.

      Because let me tell you, the study of whores is nothing that needs a special name. That's just daily life around here.

      Really, it is. I'm... I'm really popular. With girls. Yeah.

    3. Re:A lot of nerds don't get horology... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      No, it was because one part of the system did time in base-2 and the other part did it in base-10. After operating a while they'd get noticeably out of sync and then the missile would miss its target because of this.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:A lot of nerds don't get horology... by swb · · Score: 1

      It's funny, but you'd think they'd get it.

      The "average person" looks at a dumb windows PC and thinks "cheap and a great system".

      The nerd looks at a complex, expensive UNIX system that barely replicates the Windows PC functionality and admires its technical sophistication.

    5. Re:A lot of nerds don't get horology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, Beavis.
      Whores are cool.

  28. As I saw it... by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    ...here in an "extra" magazine to a local centrist daily newspaper, I watched dreamily through the train window and caught myself thinking: "Darn. This piece's price prolly exceeds the amount of my savings by some 100% or so. Darn...." How great it would be to carry such a thing on your wrist, and to casually explain its function - never mention its workings & innards - to fellow humans, e.g. on a party !!

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  29. Really cool ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So I'm suddenly imagining an alternate "steam punk" timeline in which we had mechanisms and gears 2000 years ago. It's always amazing to see what was really known back that far.

    That's absolutely cool.

    As someone with a lot of watches, that Hublot wrist watch is a really cool timepiece. A skeleton watch with 2000 years of history to it.

    Though, as other people have pointed out, I bet this would cost a pretty penny.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Really cool ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...it's just a leftover piece of technology from TerraNova...

    2. Re:Really cool ... by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      So I'm suddenly imagining an alternate "steam punk" timeline in which we had mechanisms and gears 2000 years ago. It's always amazing to see what was really known back that far.

      Turns out it's actually mechanisms and gears, which means it's not so alternate.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:Really cool ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone actually watch that show?

    4. Re:Really cool ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Turns out it's actually mechanisms and gears, which means it's not so alternate.

      Funny, but I meant where they had been in continuous usage for all of that time. Not something which got lost and only rediscovered "recently" (by historical measures).

      But if we'd had clockworks gears for 2000 years, I can only imagine how many cool things would have been invented centuries ago.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Really cool ... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just imagine what we lost when the idiot Christians burned the Library of Alexandria.
      Just imagine how much was lost in ideas because if stupid laws or traditions in a certain islam bible.
      Just imagine how many scientists were killed in early society in general because their ideas or understanding was greater than some monarch, and we cant have that!

      Humanity has gone out of it's way to destroy knowledge in the name of hating change. Organized political Religion (Catholic church, Radical Islam, Moonies, David Koresh, Church of the Latter Day saints, Scientology, etc....) is simply a powerful tool to help spread hate and control. None of these religions have ANY use other than to keep certain people in power and rich at the expense of others.

      Knowledge levels the playing field, therefore heads of powerful organizations go out of their way to SQUASH knowledge as it threatens their power and might.

      Not all religion does this, but the ones that have a few that benefit greatly over the control of a large group of followers does.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Really cool ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to re-examine the destruction of the Library of Alexandria. It didn't go down the way you think it did... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#Destruction

    7. Re:Really cool ... by mgrivich · · Score: 1

      Just imagine what we lost when the idiot Christians burned the Library of Alexandria. Just imagine how much was lost in ideas because if stupid laws or traditions in a certain islam bible. Just imagine how many scientists were killed in early society in general because their ideas or understanding was greater than some monarch, and we cant have that! Humanity has gone out of it's way to destroy knowledge in the name of hating change. Organized political Religion (Catholic church, Radical Islam, Moonies, David Koresh, Church of the Latter Day saints, Scientology, etc....) is simply a powerful tool to help spread hate and control. None of these religions have ANY use other than to keep certain people in power and rich at the expense of others. Knowledge levels the playing field, therefore heads of powerful organizations go out of their way to SQUASH knowledge as it threatens their power and might. Not all religion does this, but the ones that have a few that benefit greatly over the control of a large group of followers does.

      [CITATION NEEDED] Just so you know, your understanding of history has no basis in reality. Spend some time reading, or at least on google. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#Destruction

    8. Re:Really cool ... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      There were some cool things centuries ago. There's a 17th century clock in France that displays the time, day of week, and date -- and it was Y2K compliant!

    9. Re:Really cool ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just imagine how much was lost in ideas because if stupid laws or traditions in a certain islam bible.

      The Islamic philosophers were actually extremely important in passing on the ideas of Plato and Aristoteles.

    10. Re:Really cool ... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0

      There are novels based on Babbage machines being mainstream, and how different the would would have been.

      The Difference Engine

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    11. Re:Really cool ... by caseih · · Score: 1

      You do realize that it was Islamic scholars that saved pretty much everything we know about the ancient Greek knowledge by translating it into Arabic. Some of the world's greatest treatises by Greek philosophers and scientists we have today only because they have been translated from Arabic into english and other languages; the original greek manuscripts are mostly lost.

      While Europe was floundering in the middle ages before the renaissance, the Islamic world was flourishing in terms of art, literature, and science. Sadly, Europe rose and the Islamic empire faded and fell, and all its progress stopped.

      Christianity certainly has not always been anti-science. Certainly be careful when you paint millions of people with the same brush. The only Christians that I know of who are anti-science are largely the evangelicals in North America. Everyone else seems a lot more reasonable. There are scientists who actually do real science (evolutionary biologists even!) who are of all stripes of Christianity.

    12. Re:Really cool ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#Arabic_sources

    13. Re:Really cool ... by donscarletti · · Score: 2

      The Library of Alexandria, at least the most famous iteration was burned in a Roman siege 48BC (according to Plutach), 45 years before the birth of Jesus. If you are blaming this on Theophilus (who was a bad man in his own right), then it is only recorded that he destroyed idols where some of the surviving scrolls may of been held, it would require quite a large leap of speculation to blame the destruction of the library here.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    14. Re:Really cool ... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I also realize that Islam holy men and kings also killed many inventors and other ideas because they went against islam.

      Just like how the Egyptian kings would kill an archetect if he did not do it the way the king wanted it.

      All men in power are evil at one point or another in their life, your religion simply is a tool for them to justify their evil as they can put it off on God.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:Really cool ... by biodata · · Score: 1

      The gears are non-linear in some way to match the elliptical movements of the planets. That counts as a bit alternate anyway.

      --
      Korma: Good
    16. Re:Really cool ... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Do you have a source for that? (not doubting you, just curious about it and I couldn't seem to turn it up with a quick google)

      Also you say it displays the date. Does it determine the date from the passage of time (a highly complex process due to the oddities of our calender) or do some of the rules have to be implemented through manual adjustments?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    17. Re:Really cool ... by renoX · · Score: 1

      > None of these religions have ANY use other than to keep certain people in power and rich at the expense of others.

      I'm an atheist too but this is false:
      -studies have shown that those who attend church tend to live longer than those who don't
      -my personal opinion is that confession could help people (the ancestor of talking with a psy).
      -less fear of the death etc

      So all the religions have use, now this doesn't mean that I'm an advocate of religions quite the contrary in fact: their many drawbacks far outweigh their benefits IMHO.

    18. Re:Really cool ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All men in power are evil at one point or another in their life, your religion simply is a tool for them to justify their evil as they can put it off on God.

      Fanbois Steve Jobs hint hint.

    19. Re:Really cool ... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      No, it was from somewhere around 1999 that I read it, don't remember where, but I do remember thinking how cool it was. IIRC, its calandar didn't have to be adjusted, which was one of the things that impressed me so much.

    20. Re:Really cool ... by dublin · · Score: 1

      Your historical ignorance is truly staggering, but apparently, your blind hatred of Christians and religion blinds you to much else, too... Christians had nothing to do with burning the Library at Alexandria, a fact easily provable by the fact there weren't any Christians in 48 B.C.! I expect even you can handle that math!

      Science could not (and actually, cannot) exist without or outside a Christian worldview. Science and Christianity are anything but opposed, since science itself depends on the foundational presuppositions of a Christian worldview (see van Til and Bahnsen). The medieval period was anything but dark - in fact, it was during this time that Christian scholars created modern scientific inquiry, and nurtured it to fullness.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  30. It supposedly shows Olympics time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It supposedly shows Olympics time schedules. Sadly, not London Games included, too many missiles pointed at this device. More at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism

  31. I'd have to tell the whole story every time by cod3r_ · · Score: 1

    And people would get annoyed..

  32. Re:Oh noes a watch without a camera we're all doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or if Sulu was captain instead of Kirk.

  33. The 'Mysterious' part. by leftover · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chuckle at the "made by aliens" silliness as we all do, there really is a mystery to this device.
    Archimedes was more than brilliant enough to work out the math for this orrery, also to work out the design for gear tooth profiles. He had the position and influence to have access to materials and the best crafts-people of the time. But how did they actually build that thing?
    In theory an astonishingly good watchmaker could hand-file all those gears. In practice, I'm not so sure. Gears are finicky things, every single tooth must have the correct angular position, pitch diamerter and involute profile. A gear can look very pretty but simply not work with another gear. (I have made several such.) If you don't believe it, just go to a hardware store, buy a riffler file kit and some brass washers, then have at it. No microscope, no computer, no plotter. Any tools you hypothesize have to be built using the same starting conditions. It will be an educational experience. One of your observations will be that you can not see well enough to get the profile to adequately match the math for two gears to mesh smoothly.
    So the greatest mystery, for me, is: How did they make the measurements required for this work?

    --
    Bent, folded, spindled, and mutilated.
    1. Re:The 'Mysterious' part. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Gears are finicky things, every single tooth must have the correct angular position, pitch diamerter and involute profile"

      no. The more accurate those things are, the better it measurs time. And this think wasn't very accurate. By today's standards.

      "No microscope, no computer, no plotter." Modern tool might be dampening you imagination.

      Can I use math, and pencil and a ruler? Then using that get a master gear maker to make them? because that's probably how it was designed.

      Or even better: Imagine making a watch. Now imagine its all you had to do during daylight for months, refines and measure and test. You would end up with a pretty good device.

      It's just time, motivation and patience.

      To answer you last question. Make a slight change, test, rinse repeat.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:The 'Mysterious' part. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      IF a man in the same time was able to draw a perfect circle, I guarantee that they could figure out how to draw the figures to map out simple gears that do not need to mesh tightly. this was a hand cranked device that moved pointers, excessive lash would not be a problem.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:The 'Mysterious' part. by heikkile · · Score: 1

      "Gears are finicky things, every single tooth must have the correct angular position, pitch diamerter and involute profile"

      no. The more accurate those things are, the better it measurs time. And this think wasn't very accurate. By today's standards.

      As far as I know, the original machine was not meant to measure time. It had a crank you gave one turn every day, and it showed the position of various stars etc. More like a calendar than a clock.

      --

      In Murphy We Turst

    4. Re:The 'Mysterious' part. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In point of fact, we don't really know that it worked. That part's conjecture.

    5. Re:The 'Mysterious' part. by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      A calendar (at least the kind you describes) measures time too.

    6. Re:The 'Mysterious' part. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >To answer you last question. Make a slight change, test, rinse repeat.

      Step-wise refinement as an engineering process has some very basic assumptions, like, you have lots and lots of time to devote to your task. If you are fending off invaders, hunting and killing your dinner, and trying to refine the novel concept of in-door plumbing, it is difficult to imagine seeing working on a clock as a practical expenditure of precious time.

    7. Re:The 'Mysterious' part. by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Step-wise refinement as an engineering process has some very basic assumptions, like, you have lots and lots of time to devote to your task. If you are fending off invaders, hunting and killing your dinner, and trying to refine the novel concept of in-door plumbing, it is difficult to imagine seeing working on a clock as a practical expenditure of precious time.

      Fortunately for the ancient Greeks, the slave-owning upper class had plenty of time to spare.

      (It's also why the ancient Greek steam engine, the ancient Greek railroad, the Antikythera mechanism, etc. didn't lead to an ancient Greek industrial revolution: "have a couple dozen slaves work on it for a year" works for creating one-offs, but it doesn't permit the mass production of standardized interchangeable parts that the Industrial Revolution was built on.)

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    8. Re:The 'Mysterious' part. by dublin · · Score: 1

      The gears of the Antikythera mechanism do not have involute teeth - they are simple, hand-filed triangular profiles. This device has been a hobby of mine for years, and my source for this is Price's original scholarly work on the mechanism, "Gears from the Greeks". (Getting a copy of this out-of-print book was quite difficult in the mid-90's - it took me nearly two years to find a copy for sale, and I had to pay nearly $200 for it. I expect it's out on the net somewhere these days...)

      That said, it's not the craftsmanship that's remarkable - we have plenty of ancient jewelry to prove that precision metalworking techniques were common long before the Greeks - it's the design of the device.

      The amazing thing about the Antikythera mechanism is that it's far harder to figure out how to make one, that it is to actually make it. With a only a few exceptions, most anything that could be built right before the industrial revolution could have been built by the ancient Greeks, Romans, etc. Don't get so proud of being modern - people are no smarter or capable now than they were then, we just have the advantages and motivations of a capitalist society to propagate technology...

      The measurements are pretty easy, especially for people who were fluent in geometry, as most ancient empires were. (In fact there's some substantial reason to suspect that the scientists of Rhodes had a still-unknown method of determining longitude at sea, a problem that flummoxed the west's best scientific minds (including Newton and his contemporaries) until the 18th century. (Read Dava Sobel's excellent book "Longitude" for the full story. I highly recommend the illustrated edition, which has hundreds of high-quality photos of old navigational and timekeeping devices.)

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  34. Soon to be a Dreamworks film by ackthpt · · Score: 0

    But for those that do recognize its intricate gears and dials, this tiny, complex piece of machinery tells a vivid and incredible tale of gigantic scientific upheaval, of adventure and shipwreck on the high seas, of war and death."

    Which will be turned out as a Dreamworks film because Spielberg will have always wanted to make a movie like this - it'll be 300, but with some yucks and absolutely no suspense as Steve finds it so enjoyable to have characters blather on about things to the point there's no mystery left.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Soon to be a Dreamworks film by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      ...and after the film is released, I can watch it on my watch, thus negating the need for the first watch to begin with!

  35. come on people by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    don't ruin the plot of the next dan brown book/ the next nicholas cage national treasure movie

    this sort of speculation does not belong in the halls of science. it belongs rightly in the realm of populist lowest common denominator pulp fiction with paranoid conspiracy theories studded throughout

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:come on people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't ruin the plot of the next dan brown book/ the next nicholas cage national treasure movie

      this sort of speculation does not belong in the halls of science. it belongs rightly in the realm of populist lowest common denominator pulp fiction with paranoid conspiracy theories studded throughout

      Right.... so it's perfect for slashdot!

  36. a tempting online purchase.... by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    That was a hilarious link.

    Like people are going to be all, "Oh, I can't be bothered to go down to the jewelers. I'll just buy this $200,000 watch from a website."

    Seth

  37. It's almost like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dawkins said, "I've given you the word. Now go forth and convert the masses."

    Used to be, there was only one guy at the party who, whenever the topic turned historical, would exclaim, "And then religion ruined it all!." Now you zealots are everywhere.

    --

    1. Re:It's almost like... by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      No one said "religion". Pretty much everyone said Christianity, Catholicism, and Muslims ruined it all. The rest never tried to use fear and ignorance as weapons or control mechanisms. But chances are you are one of those three, so you don't see it that way.

  38. lexical heresy by tverbeek · · Score: 2

    I'd like to take the person responsible for the first image out and punch him in the nose, for using Greek look-alike letters as substitutes for Latin letters. Using a Lambda as a capital A or a Sigma as a capital E is the worst form of international illiteracy.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:lexical heresy by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1
      I can see the meeting now:

      Engineer: "We've invented an antythera watch."

      Marketer: "It could be a big hit for history and engineering geeks alike."

      Manager: "But what's this nonsense scribbling all over it? MOYNIXIN, APEIN, KIPOPIN? I don't understand that. It has to go."

      Marketer: "Yes sir. You're right. No one will like that."

      Engineer: "But you just said--"

      Manager: "What else do you have?"

      Marketer: "What about PRL, M, JV?"

      Manager: "Hey, I like it. It looks like GRK. Reminds me of my fraternity days. What are you still doing here?"

      Engineer: "I keep looking at the unemployment rate to remind myself."

    2. Re:lexical heresy by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      Wow. As it turns out, /. doesn't do unicode Greek characters. So much for my dreams of publishing my dissertation here.

  39. Bad things happen when you read while scrolling... by Shoten · · Score: 1

    The "l" in "clock" didn't register with my eyes as the title of this post moved down my screen...wow...

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  40. plagiarism in slashdot summaries by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    It's really annoying how so many slashdot summaries these days are plagiarized directly from TFA. (I'm assuming that fergus07 is not the same person as Loz Blain.) Cutting and pasting withour giving proper attribution to the author is plagiarism.

    An even more pathetic example was this one, which was, ironically, about academic dishonesty.

    And let's say for the sake of argument that fergus07 *is* the same person as Loz Blain, and "an anonymous reader" *is* the same person as Kirk Klocke; then they should reveal that, rather than slyly plugging their own story under an alias.

  41. Did I miss something? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    Does this mean Archimedes, a guy that REALLY liked bath tubs, lost his watch in the water?

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  42. Greek alphabet abuse by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was looking awesome until I saw the close up, where horribly misuse Greek letters according to their coincidental resemblance to Roman letters. They use a Lambda instead of an "A"! ARRRRRGHH! I'd hate myself for having that on my wrist.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  43. There were no gears, much less gear makers by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    What "master gear maker" are you envisioning? This is the oldest known example of gears of this design, by a great many centuries. You might as well have said "give the design to a master clockmaker" as though that profession even existed during the millenium in question. Besides, "leftover" is right - it's extremely difficult to engineer a gear system of any complexity, much less at such a small scale, where there's no risk of the gears jamming. The tolerances required to make something like this are incredible.

    In any case, FTFA:

    It appeared to have an epicyclic, or planetary gear system in it - and those hadn't popped up anywhere else in history for another 1900 years or so. ...
    In fact, it instantly became not only the world's earliest known use of planetary gears, but the first known mechanism that used clockwork gears at all. Various civilizations earlier than the Ancient Greeks had used wooden peg-in-hole gear systems to transfer motion, but this was an order of magnitude more complex than anything before it, and indeed anything for a millennium and a half after it.

    Now that we've resolved your ignorance of the general technological level at the time this thing was made, do you understand how absolutely incredible it is?

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  44. TFS reads like a movie teaser by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    read it aloud in a James Earl Jones Meets Don LaFontaine grate, you'll see what I mean...

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  45. Funnily Enough by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    A lot of the really cool historical shit we find seems to be designed to facilitate astronomy. It seems we've been looking up at the stars for almost as long as we could look up. You can find texts on navigation and observed ephemeris data in Google books going back several hundred years. If some of those early civilizations had just managed to sustain themselves a little longer, I think we would be a lot farther along now than we are.

    My current gig is also dealing with astronomical data. I doubt some historian will find my software a few thousand years from now. That's the down side of making things out of bits. Bits don't last very long when a volcano erupts and buries them.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  46. I need this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At last, I can tell when the Olympics are to be held!

  47. Hmmm by lightknight · · Score: 1

    Sadly, this fuels my belief that the human race undergoes periodic civilization collapses, where the technology and understanding of the day is almost completely wiped out. We never quiet figure out how to get to the next level of human understanding / civilization / what have you, do we? Every time it looks like technology is beginning to unravel some of the secrets of the universe (or ourselves), social order collapses and the library / book burnings begin anew.

    I'm going to put on my plush gopher hat for the moment, and hypothesize that when the slightly more...curious members of the human race turn their attention to unraveling the universe, the slightly less curious members begin trying to f*ck up things. For example, the year that scientists / engineers perfect cold fusion will also be the year that the various politically / religiously inclined individuals succeed in creating a real World War. Can't seem to divert your attention for more than several moments before they start getting out of hand.

    I'm starting to think the human race, like a kid who craves attention, hates being ignored.

    This would explain why, in the decade since some of the greatest technological improvements mankind has seen in at least 1500 years, we have the TSA and various congress critters doing things that even Kublai Khan would frown on. Cellphones and multicore computers, the price of which is the Patriot Act and the bank bailouts.

    There must be a better way of dealing with this kind of situation. I don't want my great, great, great grand-kids thinking that fire is magic, or my even greater descendants to think that their the first ones to create a printing press. Improvements, not ditch-digging (and the subsequent filling in thereof, ad infinitum).

    --
    I am John Hurt.
    1. Re:Hmmm by Spamalope · · Score: 1

      Sadly, this fuels my belief that the human race undergoes periodic civilization collapses, where the technology and understanding of the day is almost completely wiped out.

      That is the primary thing that the printing press and a scientific community have changed. Scientists sharing information for prestige vs. craft masters concealing the secrets of their craft spreads new information further. The printing press makes it tough for political/religious suppression of information to be successful. Both together make it less likely for war to destroy everything. i.e. Kill the master, burn his scrolls, loot his works for elite who don't understand them and the breakthrough is lost - which seems the likely history of the Antikythera mechanism.