Slashdot Mirror


US Army Completes First Test Flight of Mach 6 Weapon

Stirling Newberry writes "In a terse press release, the U.S. Department of Defense announced the first test of the the Advanced Hypersonic Weapon, which launches on a staged rocket and then glides to its target, in a manner similar to the Space Shuttle's re-entry. Earlier, ABC News posted a story with a video animation of the concept. Over at DefenseTech, they argue that the trajectory being different from an ICBM is meant to show that it is not a first strike device, but even the commenters don't think that explanation flies. The speed of deployment and the ability to strike targets without going high enough to be seen by many advance warning radars makes it a precision surprise attack weapon, a kind of super-cruise-missile for surprise, asymmetric attacks."

10 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. Not first strike! by pablo_max · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is clear that this is not a "first" strike weapon. The summation is correct, it is simply a "surprise" strike weapon. Which is OK, because, hey, who does not like surprises!?

    1. Re:Not first strike! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, the real surprise is the surprise counter strike that comes before the initial strike!

    2. Re:Not first strike! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is clear that this is not a "first" strike weapon. The summation is correct, it is simply a "surprise" strike weapon. Which is OK, because, hey, who does not like surprises!?

      Like Jesus said, "Do unto others before they do unto you."

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  2. Re:Stealth rockets by Kronotross · · Score: 5, Funny

    We may not have the best healthcare, education, economy, spaceflight resources, elderly care, poverty rates, or political climate, but you better believe we have all of the time, energy, and funding in the world when it comes to bombs. Maybe it's because it's one of the few things at which we're still number one. U S A! U S A! U S A!

  3. Re:Stealth rockets by tokul · · Score: 3, Funny

    Amazing the USA still has the funds

    Printing presses still work.

  4. Re:Sweden had this four years ago... by Traiano · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes. But, unlike the Swedish version, the US version won't leak oil.

  5. *WHOOSH* by qubex · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally a slashdot article that doesn’t go *WHOOSH* over my head.

    --
    "Place me in the company of those who seek Truth, but deliver me from those who believe to have found it."
  6. Re:Whats wrong with that? by n-baxley · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, that's not making a sweeping generalization and failing to think beyond stereotypes. Bravo for your clearly thought out remarks.

  7. LOL by DarthVain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Big difference between becoming a nuclear power and having ICBM capability. Even the USA back in the day had nukes long before being able to create the ICBM delivery system.

    Just look at North Korea and their failures. Making an ICBM isn't easy by any stretch. Actually it was only a few years ago that Iran got caught trying to fake its failed rocket experiments with bad photoshoping... If they are 10 years from nuclear, they are an additional 20 for ICBM technology. It is after all, rocket science... :)

  8. Re:Stealth rockets by Pope · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nah, I'm good.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.