Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Back Kinect-Based Startups

angry tapir writes "Microsoft has announced a program designed to help 10 developers or startups launch businesses around products for Kinect, the controller that senses motion and voice. Developers with Kinect applications for the Xbox or Windows are invited to apply to the Kinect Accelerator program, even though Microsoft does not yet allow the sale of products based on Kinect for Windows."

200 comments

  1. Yay by masternerdguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh goodie, more motion control games. A good control scheme should minimize the amount of movement required for me to interface with the game.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    1. Re:Yay by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What about utilities? Consider an image viewer program. Displaying porn, naturally. Your hands are probably not free (or covered with lube). What if it did motion detection on your cock? Slowing down (or softening up) means you're bored with the current image so it will show something else.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Yay by CmdrPony · · Score: 4, Informative

      Where does it say they need to be games? Besides, motion controls make a lot of sense for certain things. Note that Microsoft is especially looking for innovators here, and helping get them going by offering $20,000, training and offices. Lots of startups don't have access to such, but have good ideas.

    3. Re:Yay by arielCo · · Score: 1

      Hi, Dr. Hawkings; I didn't know you posted on /. :)

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    4. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      minimize movement? yeah, it's called using a controller.

    5. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, if I made it a point to steal other people's obvious ideas and patent them, i'd be "looking for innovators" too. Especially the broke and defenseless kind. Fucking sickening what a once great company has become.

    6. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if I made it a point to steal other people's obvious ideas and patent them

      Prove that this happened, or admit that it didn't.

    7. Re:Yay by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft are already aware of sex-themed software for Kinect, and have rejected licensing and support for that purpose. As others have pointed out ad-nauseum, it's very hypocritical - You can massacre a whole room full of innocent bystanders in Modern Warfare 2, but you can't pinch a virtual tittie?

      It's a shame, because Microsoft and its licensees are missing out on so much potential revenue. Your idea would be well-suited to those minigames between stages where both players have to hammer both buttons as fast as they can, and the first one to inflate the balloon or destroy the car won. Except, instead of pressing the buttons, you're jacking off. Against another man, who is standing right next to you. That would be a cool arcade.

    8. Re:Yay by oakgrove · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why bother? To a fanboy no proof would ever be enough. The display text before image patent was filed after Netscape described the process in their browsers release notes. Now tell me how Microsoft didn't read the documentation for their chief competitor's at the time flagship product.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    9. Re:Yay by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      So your ideal interface would be a movie?

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    10. Re:Yay by excitedidiot · · Score: 1

      I was with you right up until the masturbation mini-games.

    11. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Circle jerking and playing XBox games are one of the best ways for teenage males (non-jocks) to bond. I pity you if you didn't have that kind of childhood.

    12. Re:Yay by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Hairyfeet entering a discussion with personal attacks. How original. I gave a very specific example that is easily verified and all you can do is make snide ad hominems because once again, reality conflicts with your own little carefully manufactured worldview. You are a crank, dude. Everybody knows it. Your MO is always the same. You dive into a discussion with a wall of contextually insignificant tl;dr and when you get slapped down with facts you run and hide for a few days just to do it again. Go run away little boy

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    13. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazingly, you haven't started in with your usual "LINSUX HUr hUr Command line herpy derby". And I'm also a bit disappointed that I haven't been regaled with you novella length dissertation on host files. Don't forget the usual 1000 word drivel from Secunia. Don't disappoint us, APK, er, I mean, hairyfeet, I mean APK;)

    14. Re:Yay by wmac1 · · Score: 1

      What kind of sport are you interested in?

    15. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, Kinect it's horrible for games. You can't control your direction so you have to play on rails. Using it outside of gaming is probably its best purpose...

    16. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the hypocrisy to being opposed to sex vs violence, they are two unrelated sects of morality.

      Violence is easy for children to process yet most adults still do not properly cope with sexuality.

      However in Microsoft's case it most likely comes down to marketing and image, sexuality being generally more frowned upon by it target consumers.

      As a result Microsoft avoids that market.

    17. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, instead of pressing the buttons, you're jacking off. Against another man, who is standing right next to you. That would be a cool arcade.

      ... backing away slowly from "Ethanol-fueled"

    18. Re:Yay by Teeroy32 · · Score: 1

      ewwww, gross

      --
      I don't have an attitude problem, Its you that has a problem with my attitude
    19. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? They don't have any rights to any IP you produce.

    20. Re:Yay by rachit · · Score: 2

      It's a shame, because Microsoft and its licensees are missing out on so much potential revenue. Your idea would be well-suited to those minigames between stages where both players have to hammer both buttons as fast as they can, and the first one to inflate the balloon or destroy the car won. Except, instead of pressing the buttons, you're jacking off. Against another man, who is standing right next to you. That would be a cool arcade.

      There is an SNL episode about that (Wii, not Kinect, though)

    21. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow dude... That is sad...

    22. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, Apple has really gone to shit.

    23. Re:Yay by jpapon · · Score: 1

      Violence is easy for children to process yet most adults still do not properly cope with sexuality.

      Perhaps that's the result of children being exposed to violence, but not sexuality. I would also like to point out that "true" violence, not video game violence, is very difficult to cope with (see PTSD), while consensual sex is generally pleasant and unlikely to cause long mental health problems.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    24. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh, look, a wall of tl;dr copy pasta from that jackass hairyfeet/apk/whoever the fuck you are. Do you have some underground war room where you keep your master troll file so you can pick and choose what to paste in depending on the subject du jour you sad fat piece of shit? Oh, and it has already been marked -1 Troll too as usual. Imagine that.

      Fucking coward ass motherfucker. You post that shit in the middle of the night knowing damn good and well that I would be asleep and unable to respond to your turd dropping. Well, I'm up now bitch and two can play the copy pasta game.

      Now let's commence with the intellectual raping.

      Now let us see what he is AFRAID TO SHOW YOU because it is the TRUTH. The CORRECT quote is "As far as the user is concerned there is NO CLI in windows"

      As far as the user is concerned, there's not a lot of things in a lot of things. Newsflash: advanced functionality is for advanced users. Duh. All you are illustrating is the typical Windows user is clueless about the features embedded in their OS of choice. They probably don't know much about "Administrative Tools" either. But for advanced uses, like, oh, I don't know, Goup Policy editing, it is a must. So, to follow your logic, there is no such thing as "Group Policy Editor" in Windows. You are a myopic trollish fool.

      Linux? Puts the terminal on the desktop

      You are a fucking liar. Ubuntu which is the distro in use by half of Linux desktop users does not put anything on the desktop. To access the terminal, you have make multiple clicks through the menu. It is well hidden. So not only are you a troll but you are an ignorant liar.

      walk up to 100 people in the street and ask them "How do you call up command line in Windows" and you know what you are gonna get? "Whats a command line"

      Why don't you do that? Because you are talking completely out of your ass? Thought so. Think about it, if you can. Out of the total population of Windows users, a certain percentage is going to know what the command prompt is. What percentage that is, I don't know but I guarantee you it is above zero. And you know it. So not only are you ignorant and a liar but you are also intellectually dishonest.

      I don't want to blow your teeny tiny little pea brain but let's put the situation another way since you are so fond of "statistics". By definition, more technically literate people are going to be using Ubuntu because it takes a willful choice to install it on your hardware in the first place. So, we are already talking about people with above average aptitude with computers. What percentage of the pop uses Linux? About 1-2 percent depending on who you ask. What percentage of people can probably tell you what the command prompt is on windows? Probably the same 1-2 percent. Think about it, simpleton.

      if your driver model isn't shit then why does Dell have to run their own repos

      The same reason they have their own support area where you can download their drivers for hardware running Windows. And that driver model that you call "shit" --as if a pathetic piece of shit like you could even begin to recognize driver code if it slapped you in the face-- is the reason the Linux kernel runs on everything from embedded gumstick sized arm boards all the way up to supercomputers and everything in between. It's called portability, stupid. It's the reason Google chose to keep Dalvik for Android. So that I can install Android on my netbook and actually use the apps. One of the main reasons the Linux kernel is so portable and fills so many niches is because many of the drivers are in the kernel and can be compiled right along with it. So my USB 3G dongle that works on my x86 laptop also works on my Asus Transformer. Thank you, Linus Torvalds. Fuck you bassbeast.

      How about how a decade old Windows beat the shit out of Linux on netbooks or how ASUS has given up on your bullshit or

    25. Re:Yay by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      That's why the Penn State football program is so good: it exposes kids to violence and sexuality.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  2. Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Informative
    You get $20,000, but you have to relocate your team to Seattle for 3 months, AND give up 6% of your business.

    Forget it charlie brown.

    1. Re:Rip-off central by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I also think that this is a bit rough, it may be within the bounds of acceptable for some start-ups. I can imagine that normally VC companies would take a bigger slice of the pie then 6%, but I am also thinking that the 6% is really just the ticket inside the door. If in order to get more money you have to sacrifice more of your stock, then this becomes less and less appealing - even to a one or two man startup with an idea for a cool use.

      The article does come up with a few very interesting apps that are out there - such as giving a doctor the ability to view different x-ray images without having to touch anything. I can imagine that this sort of thing would be VERY useful to an operating room where the doctors aren't supposed to touch anything after they have scrubbed down.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    2. Re:Rip-off central by The+Askylist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about sign language input? Surely MS could find it in them to develop an interface to turn signing into text? Not sure how good this Kinect thing is (don't game or use Windows), but that's one useful project they could support.

    3. Re:Rip-off central by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article does come up with a few very interesting apps that are out there - such as giving a doctor the ability to view different x-ray images without having to touch anything. I can imagine that this sort of thing would be VERY useful to an operating room where the doctors aren't supposed to touch anything after they have scrubbed down.

      Wow, that's the first time I've heard of anything a gesture-based (i.e. Minority Report) interface would be good for. Allowing a surgeon to manipulate an image display without touching anything is just cool.

      As to the costs of joining the program (moving to Seattle, 6% cut, etc), it might be worth it if you get to have face-to-face contact with the engineers and developers of the Kinect SDK. Having the engineering team right there listening to comments, complaints, and suggestions to improve and modify the SDK would be very helpful.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    4. Re:Rip-off central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

      Uhh, surgeons already have highly-trained operating room nurses to help with stuff like that. And unlike some motion-sensing device, these nurses are damn good at their job and function all of the time, especially when a patient's life is on the line. If the doctor needs the fucking x-ray to be moved, the nurse just does it. He doesn't have to stand there motioning repeatedly like an idiot while the device fails to properly detect and act on these motions.

    5. Re:Rip-off central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      yeah, surgeons took a really long time to figure out how useful kinect would be to them in the OR.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5Ep3oqicVU

    6. Re:Rip-off central by CmdrPony · · Score: 2

      Besides, 6% really isn't that much for getting $20,000, good training and working with the engineers. Licensing usually costs a lot more and is often out of reach from startups because they just don't have that kind of money. Hell, Apple and Google take 30% just to sell your products on their markets.

    7. Re:Rip-off central by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Er, how much does Microsoft take to sell your product on their market? Bias much?

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    8. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      You get $20,000, but you have to relocate your team to Seattle for 3 months, AND give up 6% of your business.

      Exactly what do you think you give up in return for VC normally?

    9. Re:Rip-off central by kermidge · · Score: 2

      If everything comes out of the 20 large, it might could be tight, especially given the size of one's team, but...

      In the old days we'd conspire together on a large house (cities used to be chock-a-block with family housing), 3+ bedroom houses rent for around two grand, general cost of living is not too bad, and the climate is congenial albeit a bit cloudy and drizzly parts of the year. Seems to me offhand that one oughta be able to cover expenses and have enough left over for a few kegs and shrimp for the barbie - every weekend.

      Six percent? Pfui. Seriously, I don't know how things work these days so much, but is this truly a bad deal?

    10. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 2

      The $20k will be eaten up and then some in travel expenses + 3 months of motel rooms, rental cars, meals, etc. This is a raw deal.

      Yes, Apple and Google take 30% to sell your products, but they don't OWN 6% of your business (and any future products you come up with). And when you sell an item on one, you're not paying a cut to the other on that sale.

    11. Re:Rip-off central by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      You're confusing a percentage of your business being signed over to Microsoft to work with them, with a percentage of each sale being paid to Apple/Google (in return for hosting and handling of payments).

    12. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The relocating for 3 months is a deal-breaker for ANY small team. They'll be losing money b the time they pay for air fare there and back, meals, rooms, car rental, cost or moving all your equipment (computers, screens, big-screen TVs, consoles) both ways, rental of a secure site, work tables, chairs, (what - you were going to just let them "offer" you a convenient place to work out of that they have the keys to? Are you retarded????) etc.

      So - they're out of pocket AND give up 6% for the "privilege" of doing what they can do w/o relocating and being out of pocket.

    13. Re:Rip-off central by CmdrPony · · Score: 1

      Nothing is stopping you from starting new business though. Yes, you will not get the trademarks etc. along, but it's not like they will own you for life.

      I'm also sure you can start developing for Kinect without Microsoft's help too, but that needs your own money. Or venture capital, which usually take a much larger share on the company. It's choices, and many startups don't always have that many. Microsoft is kind of acting as VC here, but offers training and support too.

    14. Re:Rip-off central by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Actually if anything the relocation to work with the engineers and receive training is the deal maker here not the breaker. startups are risky at the best of times and good guidence and training is invaluable.

    15. Re:Rip-off central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This offer is a partnership between MS and TechStars. You are actually signing over 6% of your business to TechStars not MS. TechStars calles themselves a startup accelerator but really seem to be just a VC group.

      http://www.techstars.com/

      MS' part is is just more like marketing and trying to entice more developers to the fold.

    16. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Er, how much does Microsoft take to sell your product on their market? Bias much?

      How much does Microsoft give YOU when they sell a kinect and xbox thanks to your new app?

      Also, wrt Microsoft's app market (since the 30% cut is wrt online app markets) - 100% of zero (to within a rounding error) is a lot less than 70% of Androids' or Apples' markets. No bias at all, just simple math.

    17. Re:Rip-off central by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      You mean for all those deaf people out there who can't use a keyboard but still have the physical dexterity to sign?

      I'm honestly wondering what the point to that would be. Seems like any use case would be far better suited by some other method.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    18. Re:Rip-off central by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Informative

      (what - you were going to just let them "offer" you a convenient place to work out of that they have the keys to? Are you retarded????)

      From TFA:

      The 10 people or startups accepted into the Kinect Accelerator program will spend three months in Seattle working out of the Kinect Accelerator office,where they will receive technical training and support and be mentored by entrepreneurs, investors and Microsoft executives.

      So, does reading TFA mean I'm retarded? Yeah, I kinda did think they were going to offer a convenient place to work out of, since working with Microsoft people is kind of the point. What, did you think MS wants them to move there just for shits and giggles?

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    19. Re:Rip-off central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike YC, where you get $15,000 for 5% and have to relocate your team to Silicon Valley for 3 months?

      Actually, given how much worse the weather is in Seattle, YC has a much better deal.

    20. Re:Rip-off central by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      startups are risky at the best of times and good guidence and training is invaluable.

      Here's two useful pieces of guidance which have been well proven through the years:

      1. Never start a land war in Asia.
      2. Never get into a 'partnership' with Microsoft.

    21. Re:Rip-off central by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point. I was responding to the ludicrous implication by the ggp that somehow Microsoft is giving some better deal than Google and Apple in their app market. Not sure what bizzaro world he was getting his idea from.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    22. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Sure, 2 grand a month - on a 12 month lease. So, you're already at MINUS $4k over the initial $20k allotment and you haven't even bought tickets to get there yet. Plus the non-refundable carpet cleaning deposit, the security deposit and whatever else ... plus utilities (what, you actually want electricity???!!!).

      Furniture? Oops ... Desks, work tables, etc?

      Got any pets? Screwed!

      Got a significant other (I know, this is /., but still ... ) or a kid in school? Double screwed.

      And you've still got to get all your equipment out there and back.

      If a company asked you to work on-site in a different state for 3 months, how much would you charge, for ONE person? Because basically, they've already screened your project, believe it's viable, and they're throwing you a bone.

      If your project is already viable, you can do much better than losing money. But let's face it - this isn't about creating viable products - it's about spending $200,000 to get a whole bunch of nerds to go out and buy xboxes and kinects in the hop that maybe THEY can come up with a winner - and getting all sorts of free publicity.

      Just look at this slashvertisement ...

    23. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Nothing is stopping you from starting new business though. Yes, you will not get the trademarks etc. along, but it's not like they will own you for life.

      The contract you sign prevents that. You leave, they sue, and get an injunction against you.

    24. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I guess you didn't read the actual article. You'll be competing against the rest of the world - this is not a "every contestant is a winner" - so, if you don't have a product already mostly running, you won't get in the door.

      If you do have a worthwhile product, you already have the engineering mostly licked, right? And do you really want to trade the "opportunity" to share your work and ideas with them and lose money at the same time?

    25. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      They'll be losing money b the time they pay for air fare there and back, meals, rooms, car rental

      Ok you're obviously on some tirade where you've typed before thinking since they give you 20k to cover such things.

      cost or moving all your equipment (computers, screens, big-screen TVs, consoles) both ways, rental of a secure site, work tables, chairs, (what - you were going to just let them "offer" you a convenient place to work out of that they have the keys to? Are you retarded????) etc.

      Why the hell would you be renting an office when the program clearly provides one? And if your paranoid delusions had you not wanting to utilize the provided spaces (which is clearly a method of funding the startup) then you wouldn't even apply for the program would you dumbass?

      But i suppose it's obvious you lack any knowledge of startups and VC in general since instead of answering my question you launched into an ignorant tirade instead.

    26. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      They're both bad deals.

      For that same $15k, you'd be better off working on something else to pay the bills, and take the time to get your project into better shape - the further along it is when you look for $$$, the more $$$ you get, and the less equity you cede.

      If it takes you 6 months or 9 months instead of 3, so what? One of the benefits of that is that you've also had more time to think, and for others to test, so you end up with a better project anyways.

      If your idea is so time-sensitive that a few extra months will break you, then it's not that great an idea anyway, right?

    27. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 2

      Sorry, my mistake :-)

      I can't believe how naive everyone is thinking this is such a great deal. You're giving up 6% initially, and since you're going to need more $$$ after the first 3 months, you're going to end up owning less than 6% at the end. After all, it costs a lot more than $20k to get something from prototype to being an SKU sitting in a warehouse somewhere, with proper support in place (technical, sales/marketing, accounting, legal).

      It reminds me of one place I interviewed at this summer. They had a failed project, and a month after the interview, they were "still working on the budget in terms of how many people it would take, etc." What a joke. I took an hour to figure that out, and emailed them back: $420k +/- 20% for the first 6 months, just under a million the first year, 3 year total (costs go up as you ramp up, but income doesn't go up as fast) of ~$3 million. And that was doing it "on the cheap." I also gave them a list of gotchas that had to be checked before anything else was done (one legal, several technical).

      They had thought that they could do it for less than 200k all in in 3 months, then the money coming in would pay for the "much lower cost since it's already developed."

      Their web site still shows the original default HostPapa landing page that's been there since the spring. Is it dead, or is it dead?

    28. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Why would I rent a separate office? Because the space they are going to be offering is also going to be used by 9 other sets of strangers, all looking for an edge, all looking for other great ideas to "borrow" if they strike out after the original 3-month period. And with dozens of new faces in one space (even if it's separate offices), that's a great way for equipment to develop feet. After all, it's not like they're going to be keeping "office hours".

      And no, I wouldn't apply considering:

      1. Since they're going to be flooded with applications, you'd better have a working prototype already running.
      2. If you have a working prototype already running, why would you be looking for initial seed funding instead of going to a first round of investors? More $$$, less equity given up.
      3. They want 6% of your business - not just that one project. So, if you come up with a second great idea, you're not free to develop that one on your own and reap all the bennies.

      I've worked at VC-funded startups (including one that had $25 million to play with) - at each stage, the initial founders have to give up more and more, until in the end they own pretty much nothing.

    29. Re:Rip-off central by CmdrPony · · Score: 1

      Got any source for such contract or are you just talking out of your ass?

    30. Re:Rip-off central by CmdrPony · · Score: 1

      Where does it say you have to take your own stuff there? Even if you would need to, why cant you just move your other stuff elsewhere for the duration? How is that relevant at all to the discussion?

    31. Re:Rip-off central by CmdrPony · · Score: 1

      You know what, don't fucking apply then if it's such a problem and stop crying. I'm sure there are lots of people who are interested to take on the offer and won't post walls of text about how, gasp, you will have complete strangers working around you. Oh the humanity!

    32. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Got any source for such contract or are you just talking out of your ass?

      You've never read a non-compete, have you? Or are you just asking that question out of your a** just to argue for arguments' sake?

    33. Re:Rip-off central by CmdrPony · · Score: 1

      Since Kinect is quite timely emerging product, timing actually is a lot.

      But you go back working your daily job and let people who have ideas and innovation work on theirs. You come out as some really grumpy and bitter old guy.

    34. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Why would I rent a separate office? Because the space they are going to be offering is also going to be used by 9 other sets of strangers, all looking for an edge, all looking for other great ideas to "borrow" if they strike out after the original 3-month period.

      So use a little discretion, it's really not that difficult.

      And with dozens of new faces in one space (even if it's separate offices), that's a great way for equipment to develop feet. After all, it's not like they're going to be keeping "office hours".

      Oh yeah, like there's no security, and you certainly wouldn't want to be taking your laptop or hard-drives home with you or anything like that, that's too hard.

      1. Since they're going to be flooded with applications, you'd better have a working prototype already running.

      No, you clearly don't need that at all, you're just speculating now that you have no facts to support that.
      Your company does not necessarily need experience developing with Kinect, but the business concept does need to leverage Kinect capabilities as part of the final offering. Your team must also be willing to develop the technical skills required to bring your solution to a functioning prototype.
      http://www.microsoft.com/bizspark/kinectaccelerator/

      2. If you have a working prototype already running, why would you be looking for initial seed funding instead of going to a first round of investors? More $$$, less equity given up.

      You probably value the audience you get through their presentation at the end as well as the skills for refining your prototype. But as above, that's not the stage they are looking for.

      3. They want 6% of your business - not just that one project. So, if you come up with a second great idea, you're not free to develop that one on your own and reap all the bennies.

      Of course you are, do you know nothing about business? Your ideas aren't tied to your business.

      I've worked at VC-funded startups (including one that had $25 million to play with) - at each stage, the initial founders have to give up more and more, until in the end they own pretty much nothing.

      Of course, if you go in with no understanding of the process that is likely to happen to you, if you know what you're doing that is pretty easy to avoid. So im not sure what you're suggesting here. And although you say you've worked for a VC-funded startups it's strange that you still seem incapable of answering the initial question.

    35. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      You know what, if it's such a great deal, stop b*tching about MY pointing out the potential downsides and go apply for it yourself.

      $20k is not even semi-serious money for a start-up - especially considering that, with the competition, you're going to be at least at the working prototype stage, in which case you should be looking for first-round investors, not seed money.

    36. Re:Rip-off central by CmdrPony · · Score: 1

      So you don't actually have any contract that says "you cannot start your own company after us" for proof.

    37. Re:Rip-off central by CmdrPony · · Score: 1

      Hey, not all of us have so many problems as you seem to have. I can go and work as I please. In fact, I do. I mostly travel and work in Asia though, but if this offer interested me more and I had a viable idea or product, I could easily take it. It's your own damn fault for giving up and setting down at one place and never wanting to move and live again. Not all of us live like that, though.

    38. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, timing is not central. If your product idea will be totally trounced by the competition in 6 months, it's proof you need a better idea, because there are always delays and road-blocks that cause time slip.

      #1 example - the iPad. Microsoft had one a decade before. Amazing how Microsoft so dominated the market that nobody can compete.

      #2 example - Android and iPhone. Microsoft had been in the mobile market for so long that there wasn't room for even one competitor, never mind two.

      #3 example - Linux got onto netbooks faster, and so totally dominated the netbook market that even trusty familiar XP couldn't gain a toe-hold.

      In other words, from the success of the iPad, Android, and iPhone, and the ongoing failure of Linux on netbooks, we can see that timing is not as critical as having something that is usable. A crappy rushed product in 3 months won't beat a good product in 12 months. All your crappy product will do is make people avoid the better iteration 12 months down the road, in favor of your competitor. And kill you with restocking fees.

    39. Re:Rip-off central by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      $20,000 for 6% of your business?!

      Sure, VCs would take more than 6%, but in doing so they usually fund your entire company's operations for a couple of years. $20,000 won't cover 2 months of salary for one good engineer.

    40. Re:Rip-off central by CmdrPony · · Score: 1

      If you read the article it says the can get more funding after the three month period if VC's like the idea. That's how it works.

      Now, you could instead go directly to VC and ask for funding. But I would think it looks a lot better if you have worked on the product with Microsoft and already have something to show.. and that people already are thinking the idea is great.

    41. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      $20k is not even semi-serious money for a start-up - especially considering that, with the competition, you're going to be at least at the working prototype stage, in which case you should be looking for first-round investors, not seed money.

      This program is seed money (as well as equipment, office space and mentoring) to develop a prototype to present to investors, and if you'd bothered to actually read the page detailing the program you would know this and wouldn't be posting rubbish like this, it's really not that hard to find out.

    42. Re:Rip-off central by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      So prosaically debating the efficacy of whether this program makes sense to the people it is aimed at is "crying" now? And you're aiming your complaint at someone that actually has experience dealing with small startups and venture capitalists? Maybe you should "stop crying" and start listening.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    43. Re:Rip-off central by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Watch the Youtube link below. X-rays for surgery were useful in about 1985. Clearly it's much easier for a doctor to rotate and scan through the layers of a CT or MRI on their own rather than have to explain every little way the want it manipulated.

    44. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I read it while it was in the submission queue a few days ago. AND I went to the website to check it out. It stunk then and it stinks now.

      Do you really believe that given a choice between 100 groups that have a prototype, and 1000 that don't they won't pick all 10 from the 100? Doesn't it show which teams are more likely to succeed, and which ones are just blue sky with no ability to execute?

      It's not THAT hard to get a prototype up and running. You know, something more than screen shots and photoshopped vaporware. Worst case scenario, you provide input with a Wiimote instead, just to bug their a** :-p

      Ideas are a dime a dozen. Execution is what counts. Any VC would tell you this.

    45. Re:Rip-off central by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Maybe they would recruit a few young, naive new college grads with this, but IMO 6% is huge for a silly $20,000.

      At the last startup I worked at, I think the first round VCs got about 25% for $10M. Second round was even lower percentage. I guess it's just a matter of how big you want to take it, but with $20k for 6% you are valuing your entire company at about $330,000 - an amount so low they are making you take almost all of the risk (assuming you are a decent engineer, you are sacrificing ~$125-150k or more *per year* in salary, benefits, 401k, etc to create a startup, since they aren't even paying enough to scratch the surface of that).

    46. Re:Rip-off central by CmdrPony · · Score: 1

      So then apply and if you aren't picked, finish it anyway. What is your problem? Now you went ranting how Microsoft won't provide their services for everyone that applies, but only to the projects they like best.

    47. Re:Rip-off central by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Clearly neither you or the other poster you are arguing with even RTFA, so really you are both talking out of your collective asses...

      This isn't even Microsoft taking a share or paying out money, it's TechStars, a seed-stage VC company. They have been following this $20k for 6% model for the last 5 years (though I do agree with you that it's an absolutely HORRIBLE deal). Apparently they just convinced Microsoft to support them in this program in exchange for getting people working on interesting ideas for Kinect.

    48. Re:Rip-off central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about to learn and practice sign language?

    49. Re:Rip-off central by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Last startup I was at, it was 25% for $10M initially. Do the math - 100/6 * 20k = $330k. If you think that's the potential total value of your idea, it's really not worth pursuing.

    50. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 2

      Do you really believe that given a choice between 100 groups that have a prototype, and 1000 that don't they won't pick all 10 from the 100? Doesn't it show which teams are more likely to succeed, and which ones are just blue sky with no ability to execute?

      No, it doesn't show that at all, having a prototype for an idea is not necessarily better than just having a good business case, if you can't show a proper business application for your prototype then what good is it. Not to mention this program explicitly states that the goal of the program is to develop the prototype and that if you have a prototype already then this program is probably of little use to you. It's common sense and basic reading comprehension, why are you having so much difficulty with it?

    51. Re:Rip-off central by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Leases, yeah, crap, I'd forgotten about them. I've signed enough, dealt with more, found them sometimes annoying but a little creativity helped get around most of their impediment. Helps to rewrite them before signing, at least it used to. Ditto utilities. I've never signed a lease with a non-refundable clause, so have no knowledge about that. But back in an earlier life I sold real estate and was involved in writing a rent-control ordinance. I guess things have gotten even crappier in the intervening years, tho.

      Guess I had a bare house in mind. Furniture, rugs, housewares from Salvation Army store, Goodwill, St. Vincent dePaul, etc., get some cheap futons. Cheap but effective. Times have changed, I guess.

      Personal life stuff, oh yeah, that could be a hassle. Time of year might make a difference if kinder involved; pets and s.o. might be deal breakers. Sorry, I thought of them, but somehow imagined that in many cases something could be worked out. Sheesh, I really didn't think things through.

      I made a fatal assumption that MS would provide tools apart from one's personal equipment.

      So, I guess they end up with vagabond coders - which isn't necessarily all bad. Meanwhile, the real developers can persevere, find venture capital, etc. Hmm, that last sentence might seem snarky or something, didn't mean it that way, 'cuz I agree with your point.

      Thanks for the serious, informative reply. You've helped me better understand an apparently superficial opportunity/PR stunt.

    52. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Last startup I was at, it was 25% for $10M initially. Do the math - 100/6 * 20k = $330k. If you think that's the potential total value of your idea, it's really not worth pursuing.

      If you've given up 25% then that $10M is not seed funding like the 20k + office + mentoring that this program is offering, that's first round investment which is the end goal of the program.

    53. Re:Rip-off central by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      You still don't give up 6% of your company for $20k if you ever hope to have anything left for yourself after a first round of VC funding. $20k won't cover 2 months of salary for one person in a decent engineering job. And your question was "what do you think you give up in return for VC normally", not "what would you give up for a really small angel investment".

    54. Re:Rip-off central by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      If you read the article it says the can get more funding after the three month period if VC's like the idea. That's how it works.

      How does this help for the practical expenses the first three months which is what is being discussed anyway? Not only that but if the vc's don't like your idea, you get to go home and hope nobody steals your idea which is almost laughable considering you're dealing with a company Microsoft that is known to steal other companies ideas then patenting them and using the patents to extort other companies years later. How much koolaid have you had today?

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    55. Re:Rip-off central by oakgrove · · Score: 2

      So then apply and if you aren't picked, finish it anyway. What is your problem? Now you went ranting how Microsoft won't provide their services for everyone that applies, but only to the projects they like best.

      Are you really that dense? 20,000 dollars is not even close to enough money for it to make any sense whatsoever to pick your team up, go to Seattle and shack up with a bunch of other rubes like some nerd version of the apprentice for 3 months for the off chance that you might be the lucky schlub that doesn't get voted off the island. This is a stupid idea for anybody through and through. It reminds me of the lottery. A game where a whole bunch of stupid people make one stupid person look really smart.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    56. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      You still don't give up 6% of your company for $20k if you ever hope to have anything left for yourself after a first round of VC funding. $20k won't cover 2 months of salary for one person in a decent engineering job.

      So what exactly do you expect to give up for your seed funding then? This is pretty much the identical system as used by YCombinator.

      And your question was "what do you think you give up in return for VC normally", not "what would you give up for a really small angel investment".

      Seed funding is a component of VC.

    57. Re:Rip-off central by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      6% for 20K acceptable? 20K will pay for 2 developer months- 3 if your devs are cheap. You're going to pretty much immediately need a new source of funding, which will cost more dilution. This isn't a good deal, it's a complete ripoff. If you're in a state where such a small amount of money is worth giving up equity, keep your day job and run it as a side project.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    58. Re:Rip-off central by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      So they're a crappy angel investor instead of a VC. It's still a miniscule amount of money for a large chunk of the company. It's a bad deal.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    59. Re:Rip-off central by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      You act like YCombinator isn't widely thought of as a horrible rip off. It is. You're always going to give up too much to your first angel investor, but if they aren't going to fund at least a couple of devs for a year, you're best off looking for a better deal or shelving the idea.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    60. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Did you actually read what the program is about? It's not 20k for 6%, there's a lot more to it than that.

    61. Re:Rip-off central by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      It's 20K, some software, and access to talk to the VCs. So basically 20K, 25K tops with the software. Still one of the biggest ripoffs I've ever heard of. Any reputable angel investor will sponsor at least 6 months of development at a decent salary, if not a full year. The amount of money they're offering is laughable, especially with the chunk of the company they're taking.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    62. Re:Rip-off central by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      Or sign to text translation. Limited usage and I see low commercial viability, but it would be interesting.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    63. Re:Rip-off central by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Yes, they can get more funding- for an additional chunk of the company. The VCs won't give them that money just because the idea is cool. They'll want a return on it. So you're selling them 6% of the company for 20K and the chance to sell more of the company to them later.

      Have you ever worked for a startup or studied the process of starting a company before at all?

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    64. Re:Rip-off central by CmdrPony · · Score: 1

      It's kind of obvious that VC's want return for their investments. I don't think that's new to anyone, so what are you arguing about? That whole venture capital thing is a scam now?

    65. Re:Rip-off central by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      So what exactly do you expect to give up for your seed funding then? This is pretty much the identical system as used by YCombinator.

      Seriously... $20k ISN'T seed funding, it's petty cash. Joining a startup often means taking a pay cut in return for equity, but if you are working for nothing and giving away significant equity you aren't doing it right. And YCombinator? Yeah...

      Clearly this is all rhetorical for you. I have worked at 3 startups, one that failed two that were acquired. Just trying to give some useful input on the thread, and not really interested in armchair commentary...

    66. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      There's also office space, equipment and mentoring. I'll bet you plenty of people take up the offer and in the end 6% of nothing is still nothing so if it doesn't get off the ground they've just wasted all that time, space and money.

    67. Re:Rip-off central by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Oh sure, there's plenty of suckers in the world. People will take them up on it. That doesn't change the fact that they're giving up more of the company for less than they would going through normal angel channels, by almost an order of magnitude.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    68. Re:Rip-off central by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Your post said that they could get additional funding at the end. The way you stated it made it sound like they could get more than 20K for their 6%. No, to get additional funding at the end they'll have to sell a larger chunk of the company. So don't pretend that's an advantage of taking this crappy deal.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    69. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Seriously... $20k ISN'T seed funding, it's petty cash. Joining a startup often means taking a pay cut in return for equity, but if you are working for nothing and giving away significant equity you aren't doing it right.

      You were comparing it to first round VC just a minute ago! And now that i've posed you a question - that you don't seem to have been able to answer - you're off on a tangent about how this is too little an amount for even seed funding. Well the fact is if you've got an idea and want to develop it into a prototype to market to VCs then 20k to sustain yourself (even a small team of 2 or 3) for 3 months while you do it is plenty especially when everything, even the investors, are provided to you. How much exactly do you think you would need for this? What's the amount you would require for such a project and how much would you give up to get it?

      Clearly this is all rhetorical for you. I have worked at 3 startups, one that failed two that were acquired. Just trying to give some useful input on the thread, and not really interested in armchair commentary...

      No, not rhetorical at all and if you actually believed it was 'armchair commentary' you wouldn't be participating so don't give me that rubbish, particularly when you compare this program to first round investment and then even go on to extrapolate it and now can't even answer what you would expect to give up for seed funding, that doesn't give much validation to your claim.

    70. Re:Rip-off central by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      it may be within the bounds of acceptable for some start-ups,

      Only for those already in Seattle. It's not enough of an incentive to move an established company, even just a small startup, to Seattle and even for those startups already there $20,000 is chump change. That will pay the salary of 2 or maybe 3 developers for one month which probably isn't enough time to do anything useful. Startups need millions and at least a couple of years to have a chance at getting into something worthwhile. If that wasn't true, nobody would "waste" time pitching business plans to acerbic and capricious VCs who want controlling majority stakes in anything successful that comes out the other end.

    71. Re:Rip-off central by Imbrondir · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good offer to me. 6% for 20k USD (which would assume the company is already worth almost 400k USD). Then you become "MS backed". Not sure what that means, but the title alone will make many future customers trust you more. That may be worth the 6% alone.

    72. Re:Rip-off central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering MS have one of the healthiest partner ecosystems in the business with literally 10's of thousands of partners making their income off them makes number 2 a piece of guidence for idiots. They have had bad partnerships, but they are far outweighed by there good ones and there are far worse partners to have in the business (ie, Apple, google, IBM, Sony et al).

    73. Re:Rip-off central by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      You were comparing it to first round VC just a minute ago!

      Wow - again - YOU were the one who brought up "VC", and then for some reason changed the question...

      And now that i've posed you a question - that you don't seem to have been able to answer - you're off on a tangent about how this is too little an amount for even seed funding.

      Not a tangent, it's relevant and true...

      Well the fact is if you've got an idea and want to develop it into a prototype to market to VCs then 20k to sustain yourself (even a small team of 2 or 3) for 3 months while you do it is plenty especially when everything, even the investors, are provided to you.

      Yeah, I think I mentioned on another thread - you might be able to get a couple naive starving new college grads to accept this, but for the experienced engineers in the valley they are either going to self-fund/work for *large* equity over pay or expect a decent salary for their efforts - taking neither makes no sense.

      How much exactly do you think you would need for this? What's the amount you would require for such a project and how much would you give up to get it?

      You want real numbers, sure, what the heck. Joined a startup in 2003 - ~3 people working on it for the first 6 months, 6-9 people for the next year, with a few small angel/seed investments totaling about $1M, maybe 15-20% equity given up? Barely enough to pay office space, capital, and minimal salary over time. Sold for a bit over $10M, so angel investors made 50-100% profit. Sure glad we didn't value the entire company at about $330k from the beginning, wouldn't have made out very well on that. But luckily the founders weren't morons. That's just one example, of course - most startups fail miserably, and a select few strike it big. But if you go into it *expecting* less than this you were better off not bothering...

      Still think it was armchair commentary, but I guess I was bored. Now I'm tired. Have fun, hope you take a chance and find your own successful startup some day, just try not to give it all away to investors for the equivalent of a couple months salary...

    74. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      I don't think there'd be many people that wouldn't give up their whole 'idea' (since that's all this is, no prototype or anything like that) for that price, that works out to ~$330k for nothing more than the idea.

    75. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Wow - again - YOU were the one who brought up "VC", and then for some reason changed the question...

      It's all a part of venture capital, whether that's the seed funding, first round, etc... but since this clearly isn't first round funding your comparison to $10M first round funding made no sense.

      Sure glad we didn't value the entire company at about $330k from the beginning, wouldn't have made out very well on that.

      Read what this program is about, at this stage it's just an idea, no prototype no nothing, if they offered $330k to the best 10 ideas you think people wouldn't submit their ideas because they would be saying it's a bad deal?!

    76. Re:Rip-off central by FlyveHest · · Score: 1

      Or being in a room, with no computers?

      Although limited, I could see this beeing of some use.

    77. Re:Rip-off central by Mushdot · · Score: 1

      I wondered this too. I think it's a great idea as a tool for people to learn sign language. Not sure if the Kinect has the ability to pick out small changes in finger movement though?

    78. Re:Rip-off central by The+Askylist · · Score: 1

      More for all the hearing people out there who don't know sign language, so that a deaf person can quickly and efficiently communicate with them. Not a huge market, but one worth a look.

    79. Re:Rip-off central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it can't resolve fingers. It can guess many signs by the angle of the hand and the motion of the arm, but you can't fingerspell anything.

    80. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      There are different types of prototypes. If you have something to show, with an alternate interface to demo how it works and just need to write the code to "hook it to a kinect", that's one prototype that will stand out.

      If you have not-so-good prototype - static graphics that demo what "might" happen when you get things working, and you need to develop both the underlying app and the kinect interface, you're going to be at a serious disadvantage.

      Finally, if all you have are some photoshopped crap or a powerpoint presentation, and a bunch of bs about how great it will be, how do you expect to even be taken seriously? It's called "doing your homework."

      All this is in addition to the actual market demographics and business plans.

    81. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      MS might very well provide things like xboxes and plasma screens, but let's face it - when you're trying to get "in the zone" (which you'll have to be pretty much constantly to do this) you keep weird hours (I don't know about you, but my most productive times are after midnight for some strange reason, when "fix that last little bit" becomes ZOMG here's 3 different features I can quickly add that will make a big difference ... and the next thing you know, they're all added and it's 4am, or in last night's case, "only" 3:15 am). Not having the equipment right at hand is a productivity killer. I'd want the team to be living with the hardware, not commuting, or worse, just rolling over and going back to sleep because they can't feed their inner inspiration.

      What this shows is the level of desperation out there - even a small development team is going to have 1-6 each of artists and coders, and several testers who can do more than the minimum-wage "tester drones" that agencies employ - they know how to report bugs, have enough knowledge of what the programmers are working on to be able to mostly speak their language, and even point out good places to start looking in the code for the current bug. Even 2 of each is still 6 people, and housing, transporting, and feeding 6 people for 3 months in a strange city where you don't know the ins and outs, plus getting them and all your gear there and back, $20k isn't going to cover it unless you go with a monthly rental - which probably comes with bedbugs.

      The proper way to do this type of event would be to rent a lodge or summer camp during the off season, and invite people to work out of there for 3 months. Communal cafeteria, weekly kegger around the fire, bring your pets (as an aside - whatever happened to the "tech companies are pet-friendly" meme anyway - I know that at Netscape, it was because Marks' 2 Newfies scarfed down a banquet before the humans got to it, but still ...), no worry about places to bunk down, and lots of tables for working at as well as enough space to give each team not only their "own space" but some real privacy.

    82. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Then you become "MS backed".

      If that's what you want, then fine ... but if your company is already worth $400k (and not a "well, when we're finished this code, it will be worth $400k"), why aren't you out there looking for first round investors for serious money instead of seed money? Because you know that when you need more money, you're going to have to either show an increase in the business's worth (to issue new shares) or give up equity (to sell current shares). Of course, you can also just issue new shares without having increased the business' worth, but then you're just diluting existing shares value - something current shareholders will scream at you for doing.

      Not sure what that means, but the title alone will make many future customers trust you more.

      Must ... Resist ...

    83. Re:Rip-off central by Xest · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, when they've invested $20k in you and have a 6% stake in your business they have some interest in supporting you and seeing you do well.

      If you're just interested in producing a cool product based on this tech it still opens the door for you to get a 6 figure salary doing something you enjoy whilst retaining a controlling stake in your company. For many people that's all they could ever want in life. Chances are if you do a good job you can always cash in and sell the rest off to Microsoft for a fair whack anyway.

      Most people will put aside paranoia and don't suffer FOSS zealotry if it means they have a chance to do what they love doing, getting to engage with some pretty fucking smart people working on cutting edge tech. But this is why someone with a genuine interest in the field will go ahead with this, probably do something pretty cool and groundbreaking, make decent money and have fun doing so, which is more than can be said for half the Slashdotters crying out paranoid screams about how it's a trap.

      This kind of deal is a foot in the door and if your overriding interest is doing what you love then it's the difference between being able to do that and likely make a decent living, and being stuck in some dead end piss boring CRUD app development role.

      Any illusion of succeding all by yourself without any outside financial support and without building up any contacts with people in the industry through fear of them stealing your ideas or whatever is precisely the type of attitude you need if you don't want to go anywhere or do anything in life.

      I doubt the likes of Zuckerberg fail to sleep at night because Microsoft has a 6% share in his company or whatever. He's still done pretty well out the deal no?

      Personally I don't want to migrate to America, if it's even open to foreigners, but for anyone taking this up, good on them, I suspect they'll have a great time and even if it doesn't take off find they've enjoyed an experience that at least looks very good on the CV and gives them a step up in life.

    84. Re:Rip-off central by Imbrondir · · Score: 1

      My comment was for the "well when we're finished this code, it will be worth 400k $" startups". On re-reading I can see I wasn't very clear about that.

      However as much as I dislike and distrust MS, I'm still pretty sure that being called a "MS backed" company is worth something. Didn't MS next to save the Mac when MS ported Office to the Mac and Gates invested 150k in Apple? How would HTC be received in the west if they had not arrived as MS (only?) partner? This is not to say that one should forget how they back-stabbed and ruined Sendo before going to HTC with all their know-how. But for a tiny nobody it's a decent opportunity.

    85. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with any sort of "FOSS zealotry" (hint - look at my current .sig), and everything to do with the deal having major suckage for what is a paltry investment. Hint - the company managing this contest will make more than all the people combined - so why not just run similar events?

      I doubt the likes of Zuckerberg fail to sleep at night because Microsoft has a 6% share in his company or whatever. He's still done pretty well out the deal no?

      Microsoft paid $240 million, not $20k. And that was for a 1.5% stake, not 6%.

      Also, in these situations, they almost always lose control of their business. The fact is that when you go looking for real funding, the investors are going to want equity in return - and since you've established that your business has a total potential valuation of only $334k or so, based on 6% for $20k, you lose control when you get an additional ($334k/2-$20k already burned) or $147k - which also has to go to growing the business, not towards any 6-figure salaries for you and anyone else you're working with, to get it to the point where the next round of investors will come in.

      And when you're looking for actually transforming your product into an SKU that can be sold, even if all of a sudden your business is worth 10x as much, you're going to have to give up most of that just to cover the initial costs of production, packaging, marketing, etc. Profits? If there are any, since your backers own 95-99% of the business by then, you won't be seeing much, if any. And that's if you succeed - not very likely at all.

      Better way: Get your product to the point where it can actually be shopped around as something ready to go to the target market. This means having a finished product, having actual sales!!!! (not just "oh, they tried it and they like it so we think others will buy it" blue-sky thinking), and a plan for rolling it out. THEN you're in a position to look for an investor or 2, or maybe a manufacturing/distribution equity partner, and not give away the store.

    86. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      It was $150 million, not $150k :-) Now, if these people were saying that they were putting $20 million instead of $20k into the kitty for 10 projects, it would be more realistic - you'd get real teams with solid experience looking at it, and at least kicking the tires.

    87. Re:Rip-off central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can sign faster than you can type.

      On the other hand, sign language isn't a direct representation of english. The grammar is different enough that a american-sign-language-to-english translator would be an actual translation program.

    88. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      It's not about having a prototype, are you really that dense?! The program is to build the prototype, seriously how about reading the about topic rather than looking like the complete fool you are now. It's not written in any obscure language, it's quite clear what the project is about but it seems you're so fanatical about it being a bad thing that you're not even capable of understanding what it is anymore.

    89. Re:Rip-off central by Darkling-MHCN · · Score: 1

      The cost of this system would be in the thousands.

      How much do you need to pay that nurse annually?
      How many jobs would these systems eliminate?

      Even if it fucks up once a year, do you think a hospital is going to ignore a system that allows them to eliminate the need for that highly payed nurse in the OR?

      Technology always has and always will be used to reduce costs by eliminating the need for human resources. When technology like this is introduced, nearly always the complaint is the technology isn't as good or reliable as the human being it replaced, but the bottom line always wins.

    90. Re:Rip-off central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize those are almost exactly the same terms as YC (they give you $(13 + 4n)K for 7% of the company and you have to relocate to Mountain View for 3 months), which people generally consider one of the hottest incubators on the planet?

    91. Re:Rip-off central by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the wee-hours mad coding spells when one is "in the groove." Long time ago for me but I can still almost taste the experience.

      I like your idea - I think you've nailed it. Would mean more upfront cost for Microsoft - still essentially chump change, tho - and solve most of the original shortcomings and ameliorate the rest, I should think.

    92. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I read it, and anyone who doesn't have at least a partially built prototype is going to lose out against someone else competing who does.

      So use your head for more than a hat-rack and try to UNDERSTAND what I wrote instead of being intentionally obtuse, mkay? This is a business competition as much as it is a technical competition.

      You submit a proposal for $20k seed money and you have an idea, a 3-page plan, a few powerpoint slides. I submit a video of a working prototype, along with future milestones that need to be hit, a list of technical challenges that have ALREADY been met (past performance is a better indicator of future performance than "oh we have a plan"), and the funding that will be needed for each milestone.

      If we set both ideas as being of equal merit, yours will lose.

      Also, you fail to consider what happens if it doesn't get beyond the 3-month stage. Who owns the IP? Not you exclusively any more - you sold it. So any great ideas that you may have come up with, they're free to patent, copyright, use, whatever.

    93. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Yes, and YC is just as crappy. I checked them out, and I'm amazed at how much cheaper everyone sells themselves out compared to 15-20 years ago.

    94. Re:Rip-off central by exomondo · · Score: 1

      I read it, and anyone who doesn't have at least a partially built prototype is going to lose out against someone else competing who does.

      If that's the conclusion you came to after reading it then you clearly have a MASSIVE reading comprehension problem.

      You submit a proposal for $20k seed money and you have an idea, a 3-page plan, a few powerpoint slides. I submit a video of a working prototype, along with future milestones that need to be hit, a list of technical challenges that have ALREADY been met (past performance is a better indicator of future performance than "oh we have a plan"), and the funding that will be needed for each milestone.

      THE PURPOSE IS TO BUILD THE PROTOTYPE, seriously you couldn't be more retarded if you tried, it's written there in black and white and you are still so braindead you'll inject things that clearly are not there. What would be the purpose of entering into a program to build a prototype if you've already built one?! How can you be so dense that you don't get this?

      Also, you fail to consider what happens if it doesn't get beyond the 3-month stage. Who owns the IP?

      The company you founded for the competition, which you will part own with TechStars. Pretty obvious, but since you're clearly too dense to read what's written in black and white you probably don't have the intellectual capacity to infer such basic and obvious information.

      Not you exclusively any more - you sold it.

      Obviously, you know, the part where you sold 6% is a dead giveaway...or maybe that wasn't obvious to you.

      So any great ideas that you may have come up with, they're free to patent, copyright, use, whatever.

      No, what retarded world do you live in where that would be the case, you're selling part of the business, you're not selling yourself, everything you come up with from there on is not owned by the business you idiot.

    95. Re:Rip-off central by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      You raise some good points... except for the fact that anywhere in this discussion someone said something in favor of the event, you pounced on them. (Yes I read all the posts, incl. Score: 0). I wonder why, and what your motivation is. Care to give some context?

    96. Re:Rip-off central by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Why? Because these sort of "contests" have huge down-sides, and most people don't even think about it.

      There alternatives to getting involved with VCs at the initial development stage. People should consider them. If you only have a concept, w/o even a fake demo to show what sort of idea you have, then you're not at the stage to go look for funding except from angels - or to self-fund.

      Let's rephrase the proposition:

      "You will give me 6% ownership, and joint ownership of your IP. You will come to work at location $X for 3 months along with the rest of your team, for what works out to be less than the minimum wage, no overtime, no benefits. In return, if you produce something that I can use to sucker money out of others, you will give over more equity in return for continuing to work for less than the minimum wage for as long as it takes. By the time it's ready for launch, you will own almost zero equity, I'll have made hundreds of thousands in fees and "points" as well as in selling off the equity I get in each of the investment rounds, and if you get run over by a car, too bad ... read your agreement, b/c it has clauses related to non-performance on your part (you might want to look up the word "forfeiture" :-).

      Does this sound like a good deal to you, in return for what amounts to a "lottery ticket?" This is just one step up from those "I have this great idea - all YOU have to do is develop it and we'll be rich!" I don't know how many times I've heard that one.

      In the end, the product can be a huge hit, and you can still end up with nothing - not even rights to your own IP - and you can even be forced out. It happened to Steve Jobs, it can certainly happen to you.

      We don't hear about the failures because people don't want to talk about them. Once you've been through a few of them, you get to know the game. I got my first exposure to this back in 1995. "Hey, we've only lost $25 million so far ... another $x million and we'll get to market" ... so the VCs kept milking it, getting more money from investors who don't understand sunk costs, and eventually, both the startup and the spin-off went bankrupt - and for a multiple of that $25 million. In the meantime, the VCs got their money back multiple times, just in fees and selling their "equity points" (they can sell their shares at any time, YOU can't, usually not until 1 year after launch).

      I was lucky - I wasn't a partner or investor, so I was getting a regular salary instead of working for equity points, so I was able to leave when things became toxic, long before they went under. Others weren't so fortunate ...

    97. Re:Rip-off central by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I wasn't in disagreement with your points actually, I was just wondering what is your personal reason for being so strongly against this event. I understand now that it's because you've seen the ugly side of such deals from up close.

      That said, in my opinion this is still a good option for someone young and energetic who doesn't have business skills but has an idea he wants to make happen regardless of the money. E.g. someone like Steve Wozniak. They probably wouldn't know how to find angel investors or run a business, and if they are not lucky to team up with a Steve Jobs, this could be their only chance to do what they like. They may end up short money-wise but the experience could be priceless, and they may be able to use in their next startup.

      For someone closer to a finished product, I think your points are definitely something to keep in mind.

  3. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A good control scheme allows the player to have fun playing the game. Go back to your cave.

    1. Re:Wrong by Dahamma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You clearly haven't tried the Kinect. Currently it satisfies neither of those.

    2. Re:Wrong by Teeroy32 · · Score: 2

      what, my gf, my daughter and I have lots of fun playing kinect, shits all over wii, least we don't have a problem with controllers flying across the room

      --
      I don't have an attitude problem, Its you that has a problem with my attitude
    3. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun? Maybe at a party, and only a few of those. Most were shit, and I can't imagine why would I let go of a proper controller.

    4. Re:Wrong by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      Ok, my comment was slightly harsh :) What games have you liked? I have tried a couple and they are awful. Two examples:

      Kinect Adventures: brain dead version of dodgeball (but where you try to get hit). Fun for about 3 minutes. And a whitewater rafting game where you control a raft by leaning and *jumping*? Seriously?

      Forza 4: basically you sit in front of the TV holding your arms out to steer. The missing part? Pedals! it can't detect that, so it just decides to accelerate & brake for you. Even stupider is the "head tracking", which changes the view based on you turning your head left and right. Sounds like a great idea, except that if you look left, you can't see your TV! Amazing...

      I'm sure some of the dance games can be fun if you are into that, but that's a pretty niche market.

    5. Re:Wrong by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Kinects biggest failure is it focus on the person rather than the tool. Better would be detection and triangulation of RFID stickers you apply to your favourite or very cheap piece of play equipment be it a tennis racket, golf club, fishing pole and reel, even your shoes or boots as the case may be. Even you pretend weapons should be no problem, boxing gloves, broomstick sword, or squirt gun rifle. Anything could be tagged and located, to detect distance, attitude and motion.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:Wrong by Teeroy32 · · Score: 1

      never played forza with anything but a controller(IMO its the only way, but the kinect adventures is great for family fun, stops the kids getting pudgy, and it makes a great game for stoners or drunk people socializing(never laughed so much in my life) just like the eyetoy on ps2, In my opinion it opens up a new genre of gaming for average people. Hardcore gamers still need a controller and/or keyboard and mouse. Maybe to expand it may need props like bats and racquet's to get the most out of sporting games, the missus likes to do Zumba so its perfect for that(cheaper then a proper class and an instructor). Besides I rather my 5 year old jump around like a twit then killing poor defenseless Russians with a machine gun. Gamepad for racing, fighting and hardcore sport sims like FIFA, keyboard/mouse for FPS and strategy motion sensing for chilled out casual family fun. p.s the kinect would be good used in conjuction with a proper joystick on a pc for flight sims, especially in this day of multiple monitors(especially tripple), the head tracking from forza would be excellent, move the HUD to where your looking or for targeting like real life fighter pilot.

      --
      I don't have an attitude problem, Its you that has a problem with my attitude
    7. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      kinect adventures is great for family fun

      This comment was brought to you courtesy Waggener Edstrom, a Microsoft marketing partner.

      We help clients understand who their audiences are and where they can be reached. Monitoring conversations, including those that take place with social media, is part of our daily routine; our products can be used as early warning systems, helping clients with rapid response and crisis management.

      http://waggeneredstrom.com/about/approach

      If your business could use professional reputation management services, please contact us at http://waggeneredstrom.com/, the digital PR firm of the year.

    8. Re:Wrong by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      Agree with your point in principle. However, I don't think any of the current-gen motion controllers have proven able to make games more fun, past the initial "hey, look at this new control system" honeymoon phase. Taking them by turn:

      Wii: Waggle. If it's a particularly sophisticated game, it might be able to tell the difference between "waggle up and down" and "waggle side to side". The motion tracking simply wasn't good enough, even with the Wii-mote plus addon. For the most part, the Wii-mote was relegated to working as a (bad) pointer device and as a less-than-ergonomic controller which uses "waggle" as an extra button. Even many first-party Nintendo games, including the Mario Galaxy titles, conform to that stereotype. In fact, I got really, really cross with "waggle-to-spin-jump" in those - a precision platformer needs precise controls, and "waggle" does not count.

      Kinect: This is a really clever piece of technology and I'm sure there are many good uses for it. "Videogame controller", however, is not one of them. The tracking is just too inconsistent, and too prone to short-but-significant drop-outs. Kinect games basically seem to come down to "stand in front of the device flailing and shouting obscenities".

      PS Move: Callibration. What's that? You just callibrated it? Do so again! Callibration is fun! And god help you if you want to have two people of very different heights (such as, say, parent and child) playing at the same time. In fairness, on the rare occasions it isn't demanding to be callibrated, this one comes closer than the others to actually working and being fun. The motion sensing in the controllers isn't much better than the Wii-mote's, but combined with the camera system, you do get fairly good responses in practice. I genuinely enjoyed playing Dead Space: Extraction using this. Better still, Killzone 3 with this was an absolute revelation; for precise aim, this is almost as good as mouse and keyboard (though it still struggles with large, rapid turns).

      The problem I have with motion control is that I do require that the game I'm playing should be fun. A controller can be fun in its own right, for a short time, but once that novelty has worn off, we've found that most motion controlled games are actually a long way from fun. In some cases, that's because the motion controller is imprecise enough that it breaks the player's immersion in the game. In other cases, it's because the designers have built the game to get around this limitation and, as a result, come up with a game that is inherantly not fun.

      As mentioned above, Killzone 3 comes closes to pointing out how motion control might actually fit into the future gaming landscape in terms of making games more fun. Which is a bit of a pity, because in other respects, Killzone 3 is a boring trudge through a badly told story, with hateful characters and one of the least-likeable sci-fi settings around. But so was Killzone 2, so for once, I'm not blaming the motion control.

    9. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you've never tried controlling it with a boner.

    10. Re:Wrong by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0

      You possibly haven't tried the Kinect. Currently it satisfies neither of those for me, personally, because that's all I can comment on due to my lack of psychic powers in determining what every other Kinect player feels.

      FTFY.

    11. Re:Wrong by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      I personally had no interest in the Kinect, but the idea of issuing verbal orders in Mass Effect 3 has me thinking about it. I'll need more than that one thing to take the plunge, but the idea that some simple tasks could be assigned to Kinect and free up some buttons on the controller is a good one.

      Also, the startups in the article seem like they could be things other than gaming.

    12. Re:Wrong by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Maybe at a party

      And there you have it. It's social gaming. If you don't like it, ignore it. It's not my cup of tea, but I see no reason for the geekworld to go ape shit all over it if other folks enjoy it. It's something new. It's finding it's place. This was once a community that loved and celebrated new gadgets and ideas. What the hell happened?

    13. Re:Wrong by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Don't really need psychic powers when I have spent the last 6+ months working on a Kinect-enabled XBox application - I guarantee I have more experience with the details of Kinect as a motion control and voice command input device than *you* do.

      Besides, of course people post their opinions on the topic, that's the point. Your useless snark pointing out that obvious fact contributes nothing to the topic. Have a nice day!

    14. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly haven't tried the Kinect. Currently it satisfies neither of those.

      When I invite hot girls over to play Kinect games like Dance Central they love the idea. When I ask them to come play some video game with a regular controller, they aren't so enthusiastic. Who cares about optimizing the control scheme. You should be optimizing the method of getting girls to come to your living room and jump up and down a lot. Oh wait, this is Slashdot. Never mind...

    15. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't read slashdot in years.

      Thought lets have a browse has it changed?? ... yes a few interesting articles... aaah a Microsoft article.... read comments.... yes yes yes same old same old slashdot, any article on a Microsoft related technology is where trolls get moderated as interesting.

      I rate you +5 Boring.

    16. Re:Wrong by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Have a nice day!

      Thanks! :-)

    17. Re:Wrong by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      I hope it works better than their (current, at least) video player controls. I actually kind of like the voice control for simple tasks ("xbox, pause." "xbox, play.") but just feel stupid trying to fast forward ("xbox, fast forward." "faster." "Faster." "Faster!" "FASTER GODDAMMIT!") I actually felt a bit dirty doing it, especially after a coworker in the next cube said it reminded him of this video.

      The Count Censored

      As much as I like trashing the Kinect, though, it does have a huge potential - they just need to improve the fundamentals a bit and find a *real* use for it beyond the mostly awful heavy-handed game control schemes currently out there. Also, from what I have seen they have made big sacrifices to the presentation of information and general UI usability for controller/remote navigation schemes in order to make one UI for all input methods (big fat buttons for gesture clicking and few selectable items onscreen to limit voice grammar complexity) - which is a shame for apps that no one wants to flail around like an idiot control anyway...

    18. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh, I want some "naked dance central" with hot girls, and a recording of what the Kinect sees...

  4. They want to steal your ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    They just want to steal your ideas and patent them so they can keep the shakedown gravy train rolling. I read the list you gave barnes and noble. Practically every patent on it was a stolen idea that had been done elsewhere first. And you think I'm going to give you front row seats for my ideas? Fat chance.

    1. Re:They want to steal your ideas by the+linux+geek · · Score: 1

      It seems unlikely that there wouldn't be NDA's involved with this program, despite your apparent inclination toward paranoia.

    2. Re:They want to steal your ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For anybody broke enough to need to participate in this, an NDA between them and MS wouldn't be worth the paper it would be written on. Furthermore, why is it that every time MS doesn't something egregious like threatening companies with patents on stolen ideas it suddenly becomes "paranoia" the very next day to want to take their behavior into consideration. Covering your fucking ass against snakes like Microsoft is most emphatically not paranoia contrary to what fannies like you seem to think.

    3. Re:They want to steal your ideas by Locutus · · Score: 0

      they are on a hunt for patentable material based on Kinect. who better to suck the life out of than tiny startups who'll walk away happy to have seen Microsoft's campus. Seriously, $20,000 is considering backing startups?

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    4. Re:They want to steal your ideas by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      It's no worse than Y Combinator.

      We make small investments (rarely more than $20,000) in return for small stakes in the companies we fund (usually 2-10%).

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    5. Re:They want to steal your ideas by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Does ycombinator threaten to sue other companies with patents derived from ideas they swiped from the release notes of a third party company's web browser? Presenting the text before the background image of a web page was described in the release notes of Netscape version 2 before Microsoft filed for the patent on it. And now they have the gall to threaten to sue over it and it wasn't even their idea. Something tells me ycombinator will give you a much better deal.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    6. Re:They want to steal your ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For anybody broke enough to need to participate in this, an NDA between them and MS wouldn't be worth the paper it would be written on.

      Why? Because your paranoid retard delusions say so? Or because you're just incompetent?

      Furthermore, why is it that every time MS doesn't something egregious like threatening companies with patents on stolen ideas it suddenly becomes "paranoia" the very next day to want to take their behavior into consideration.

      Get your tinfoil hat back on an you'll be safe, 'Microsoft is offering venture capital, that must mean they are going to get into your head and steal your thoughts!'. Do you avoid Apple because they sue companies based on their patents on ideas that existed before they implemented them? Or HTC or IBM or Amazon or just about any other company for that matter? Or is it just because it's Microsoft?

      I read the list you gave barnes and noble. Practically every patent on it was a stolen idea that had been done elsewhere first. And you think I'm going to give you front row seats for my ideas?

      So I suppose you wouldn't submit apps to Apple's appstore either given their behavior with yanking applications after they've taken that functionality and implemented it in their OS? Or is that ok because they aren't Microsoft?

    7. Re:They want to steal your ideas by exomondo · · Score: 1

      they are on a hunt for patentable material based on Kinect

      If you're after venture capital like this you generally patent your inventions before presenting them to a VC firm, you don't present your idea and then hope they just give you money and don't run off with your idea.

    8. Re:They want to steal your ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You give up 6% of your company to TechStars not MS. TechStars looks like they have the same mission statement as ycombinator.

      From the program FAQ:

      Why does TechStars get stock in my company?

      Microsoft brings the technology, mentorship and strong business acumen to the accelerator, but Microsoft is not a seed investment firm. TechStars has direct experience running successful startup accelerator programs across the country, and is experienced in managing seed-stage equity investments. Additionally, TechStars will continue to mentor and guide the companies after they have completed the accelerator cycle at Microsoft. The companies in the accelerator get the best of both worlds, the technical and business acumen of Microsoft, specifically, Kinect, and the support and guidance of experienced seed accelerator operators.

    9. Re:They want to steal your ideas by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      If you're after venture capital like this you generally patent your inventions before presenting them to a VC firm, you don't present your idea and then hope they just give you money and don't run off with your idea.

      If you can afford to patent them, you're unlikely to be willing to hand over 6% of your company for a measly $20k.

      Besides, Microsoft probably already has patents they can use to force you to cross-license yours.

    10. Re:They want to steal your ideas by oakgrove · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So MS gets to see everything you have before they hand you off to some other company. The company that has been caught red handed filing patents on other people's ideas gets to see the cream of the idea crop for kinect development then they get to just stew on it. Based on their obvious propensity for dishonesty, they are almost certainly going to be poring over everything you've shown them searching for any little thing they can use to exploit. No fucking thanks.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    11. Re:They want to steal your ideas by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, did you have something to say? I couldn't make anything out aside from a tl;dr rant full of nothing but small minded personal attacks and straw men. Please troll harder next time.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    12. Re:They want to steal your ideas by exomondo · · Score: 1

      If you can afford to patent them, you're unlikely to be willing to hand over 6% of your company for a measly $20k.

      If you actually read what's involved it's not selling 6% of your company for $20k.

      Besides, Microsoft probably already has patents they can use to force you to cross-license yours.

      And that couldn't happen if you weren't involved in this program?

    13. Re:They want to steal your ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't make anything out aside from a tl;dr rant full of nothing but small minded personal attacks and straw men. Please troll harder next time.

      You couldn't make it out because you didn't read it, duh. Fail harder next time.

    14. Re:They want to steal your ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow the voice in my head while reading that was in the form of a six year old child stomping his feet. Hehe.

  5. End goal already patented.. by pimpsoftcom · · Score: 1

    .. no holodec for you.

    --
    - d
  6. I don't know, in my experience with Kinect.. by goruka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My experience programming Kinect is not very good..
    It fails to detect a very large range of scenarios and poses and goes crazy with objects around the studio thinking it's persons. Put your arms together, show your side or move fast enough and it will get confused.
    It's really easy to make it show broken poses and seems only designed for tracking people front-facing it directly with arms stretched outwards..
    Even the unofficial opensource SDK does much better at keeping track of you than the real thing. Not to mention the enormous input lag.
    So, is it me or has Kinect been hyped enormously for its rather lacking technical capabilities?

    1. Re:I don't know, in my experience with Kinect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so... your problem with the system.... is that it is better at recognizing the things it is programmed to recognize .... vs the things that it's not programmed to recongnize....?

    2. Re:I don't know, in my experience with Kinect.. by Hentes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems to me that you have problems with the official software and not the hardware itself. And the official software was optimised for gaming, not for nerds at home hacking the device.

    3. Re:I don't know, in my experience with Kinect.. by Nerdfest · · Score: 2

      I find it a bit hyped. The lag is still quite bad. The XBox's use of it for control is especially bad, using pauses in locations as opposed to a 'push' or some other motion to select something. It's slow and imprecise.

  7. Is there a true Kinect kickboxing game? by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    I have some raw 3d code which you could angle a player based on his arm/leg movements exactly. This isn't impressive. But I can do hit location depending on the body part. With a little work, I could calculate striking power when the two fighters collide. Then you should be able to fight computer players with actual punches and kicks being calculated on how hard you swing and stuff. I'm not sure if it would be good to fight over the Internet because the 50 milisec one way delay might not have limbs in the correct position, but maybe you could adjust by giving the defender the benefit of the doubt.

    I would assume there is something like this out already, and a light sabre battle. But if there isn't, this is what the technology is made for.

  8. silly techies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Memo
    To: Steve Ballmer, etc
    From: VP marketing/ Kinect
    Dear Steve: I have a great idea for the Kinect product. Lets sponser some people working on kinect startups. It will cost us almost nothing - and the stupid techies will think we are trying to help startups, as opposed to just spending a trivial sum of money (I propose a miniscule 200,000 dollar program) for ads.
    The amount of free ads we will get on slashdot, etc, will more then pay for the program.
    Yours,
    {redacted]

  9. For a moment there... by MisterMidi · · Score: 2

    I misread the headline and thought Microsoft was starting Kinect-based backups.

    1. Re:For a moment there... by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      I misread it as K'nex based start-ups, which would be a lot more fun, if not as profitable.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  10. Am I the only one by WiiVault · · Score: 3, Interesting

    who is not that impressed by Kinect? Its a great concept, but between the noticeable lag and issues it has with movement recognition I find most of my Kinect games don't see much playtime when my friends come over and try it for the first time. Kudos to MS for trying something fresh and new, but I just don't think it makes games more fun, or control "better" and instead tends to make me wish for a controller or keyboard. Perhaps its just that programmers haven't figured out how to get good results, but after a year on the shelf I think it might just be not quite up to the task of being a primary interface peripheral.

    1. Re:Am I the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your username is WiiVault, and you expect 3rd parties to get a new style of put motion control right on the first try? Oh how quick we are to forget the lessons of the past....

      Top tier games frequently spend well over a year on development when using only previously known and understood technologies. We should wait at least long enough for a few AAA studios to release some games designed around the kinect before any judging begins.

  11. anit trust issues? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    This sounds like some kind of MS lock in where you can only do stuff there way.

    1. Re:anit trust issues? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      anti-trust? by what stretch of the imagination could something like this be considered to have anything to do with anti-trust?

    2. Re:anit trust issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you sound like you were raised on a diet of glue fumes and paint chips.

  12. doctors? the eula says not for use at nuke plant's by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    doctors? the eula for windows says not for use at nuke plant's. I think some things don't need stuff like this and are better off doing them with more of a hard button or at least a RF remote.

    Now even banking is a little to far.

  13. Fool me once ... fool me twice ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Well, back in 1990s developers fell over themselves to develop applications for the new fangled thingie called MS-DOS. They had a slew of killer products. Lotus-123! Harvard Business Graphics. Word Perfect. dBase III. One by one Microsoft also entered into the same market segment and used its control over the platform to screw the developers and bankrupted them. They were fooled once.

    Then came Mark Andreeson. He thought, "may be if I give my product, the browser, away for free and try to make money by selling tools to create the web browser, may be I can survive". But Microsoft priced its browser below zero and killed his company. The developers were aghast. But they were fretting and fuming but could not do anything about it. Microsoft can just issue a press release saying, "We are thinking of doing XYZ" and the venture capital for startups trying to develop apps that do XYZ vanish like a curl of smoke. They were fooled many times more than once.

    Now, with a plethora of systems available, from Android to iOS to linux to simple plain HTML you think developers would trust Microsoft as far as Ballmer can throw a chair? No way buddy. No way.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Fool me once ... fool me twice ... by nickmalthus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, the company Micro$oft licensed the Kinect technology from Open Sourced the platform at openni.org and Asus has already has released a Kinect competitor called the Xtion Pro. If someone has a good motion capture product idea they can develop it independently of M$. This is just a ploy by Micro$oft to the troll the community for promising future product ideas so that they can patent the most promising ones for themselves.

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be-T J
    2. Re:Fool me once ... fool me twice ... by CmdrPony · · Score: 0

      Oh, you're so cool when you use Micro$oft and M$

    3. Re:Fool me once ... fool me twice ... by DeeEff · · Score: 1

      Just how far CAN Ballmer throw a chair?

    4. Re:Fool me once ... fool me twice ... by DeathFromSomewhere · · Score: 1

      But Microsoft priced its browser below zero and killed his company.

      Shit! How did I miss out on the free money express?

      --
      -1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
    5. Re:Fool me once ... fool me twice ... by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Yes, the company Micro$oft licensed the Kinect technology from Open Sourced the platform at openni.org and Asus has already has released a Kinect competitor called the Xtion Pro. If someone has a good motion capture product idea they can develop it independently of M$. This is just a ploy by Micro$oft to the troll the community for promising future product ideas so that they can patent the most promising ones for themselves.

      Facts are one thing, a proven history of backstabbing and bad faith negotiations is quite another. Microsoft could be making strides in solving world hunger or brokering peace in the middle east, and I'll be wondering who they're screwing over and why. No, it's not reasonable, but they have a *lot* of bad karma to cleanse.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    6. Re:Fool me once ... fool me twice ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone tie the voice recognition to ESPN and Wikipedia???? I want to ask a question and have a 3d avatar read me back the info.

    7. Re:Fool me once ... fool me twice ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      By not being one of those PC manufacturers. That is how you missed the bus. If you were making and selling PCs at that time, if you promise not to pre-install Netscape you got a bulk discount on other Microsoft products you were selling. Most of the big names paid a flat fee and sold unlimited copies of Ms Windows. They got ridiculously low prices on Ms-Office to keep Netscape out.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    8. Re:Fool me once ... fool me twice ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how that is the same thing as Microsoft giving various companies/people money for using IE. Seems like people were still paying for it indirectly.

    9. Re:Fool me once ... fool me twice ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Microsoft did not descend to that level till Bing! came along. It created a program to pay for people to use Bing!.

      But IE is "free". Netscape was also "free". But Microsoft gave money / discount to companies that would not pre install Netscape. It was selling IE at a negative price. You can disagree. But the courts thought otherwise.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    10. Re:Fool me once ... fool me twice ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a second there I thought your "S" key was malfunctioning and typed "$" keys. Phew! Glad it wasn't. /sarcasm

  14. It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I feel like if you've got your act together, e.g. you have a good idea, you have expertise to build the product, and you are the sort of person who really could launch a startup, then this incubation business seems like amateur hour. Or more cynically, a way for talented industry newcomers and their ideas to be snatched up by the sharks. For myself, I'm a 20-year career engineer, with ideas for Kinect-based products, and I will put my ideas together on my own time (not March through May), in my own space (not in a TechStar office), getting whatever money I need as is appropriate for the stage of development. I will not waste time jumping through Microsoft hoops as part of their competitive screening process--that time could be spent developing. $20k is a small enough amount that it could simply be saved up in half a year of day job work. $20k is not quit-your-day-job money, either, which the 3 months in Seattle would force me to do, despite moonlighting being a sensible choice. When there is a solid prototype and business plan available, then I start the networking process. No hand-holding required, and no sharks sniffing around me.

  15. Kinect - Gathering Dust In Junk Closets Everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only people dumb enough to buy Microsoft's Sony Eye Toy ripoff were the same idiots who jumped on the dead HD-DVD format.

    Both are now sitting unused in those people's junk closets.

  16. Demo of Microsoft Social Media Spamming Tool by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    You know, people have speculated about the existence of a Microsoft tool to post pro-Microsoft blog spam to forums and blogs. I was skeptical that any company would be that stupid, but I guess I was wrong.

    1. Re:Demo of Microsoft Social Media Spamming Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, how high are you again? Stop posting on slashdot now.

    2. Re:Demo of Microsoft Social Media Spamming Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "dude" is a woman, stupid ass. Now you put the pipe down and stop posting.

    3. Re:Demo of Microsoft Social Media Spamming Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder she's so stupid.

  17. LMFAO, Too little too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah MS, but you shit all over people who experiment with your stuff in ways you don't like.

    It doesn't matter that you now have some projects you approve of, all we remember is that if you don't like it you'll fuck us over.

  18. Balmer's Last Late Gasp by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    Sounds and Feels like the last gasp attempt of the great salesman (Developers, Developers, Developers).

    Dedicated gaming consoles seem like they don't have inertia anymore given the evolution of devices over the last 3 years.

    Sad...They will spend another couple billion dollars before Balmer is ousted.

    Why is it hard for the Board of Directors at Microsoft to see this? Maybe because not hardly one of them uses games?

  19. Re:Kinect - Gathering Dust In Junk Closets Everywh by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

    Both are now sitting unused in those people's junk closets.

    Right next to their R.O.Bs. Console gaming systems have been notorious over the years for all sorts of gimmicks and flash-in-the-pan accessories, many of dubious quality or utility, thrown in to boost initial sales and with little thought given to product lifetime of after sales support.

  20. Canada Goose Kensington Parka Sale Discount Coats| by Leila123 · · Score: 0

    The Canada Goose Parka is the greatest leadership of the fashion. All The Canada Goose Coats here are good quality and best price. Canada goose parka exceeds your expectation. Canada Goose Jackets Outlet your best choice in such a cold winter. Canada Goose Kensington Parka Outlet keep your children warm out of cold. Best and authentic quality Canada Goose Parka online sale.