Slashdot Mirror


Fighting Mosquitoes With GM Mosquitoes

doug141 writes "Scientists are releasing genetically modified male mosquitoes that produce flightless female offspring. The male offspring go on to wipe out another generation of females. This is similar to the way screwworms were eradicated in the U.S., except with nature itself making more of the modified males. Field trials are already underway."

11 of 521 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory turd in punchbowl by stevegee58 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sorry to break up this anti-mosquito party, but don't mosquitos serve a useful purpose in nature?
    Is it OK for us to blindly eradicate them just because they cause disease in humans? It's not like mosquitos are going to kill us off or anything.

    1. Re:Obligatory turd in punchbowl by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nature wants to survive

      As far as I know, nature doesn't and can't want anything.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  2. Re:Nature... will find a way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While fruit bats certainly are cute, I don't think they'll be very effective at eating mosquitoes. ;)

  3. That's nuts.... by RobinEggs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Much as humans hate them, mosquitoes constitute a potent food source to smaller vertebrates. Mammals represent massive concentrations of energy, and blood is a high energy substrate. Mosquitoes are a huge power source of fish, bats, etc. when they're caught still full of blood, and they're easy to catch.

    I read in the one of the article links that the ecological impact isn't expected to be a serious problem, but I find that difficult to accept. And there are certainly detractors to that theory in the scientific community.

    Is eradicating malaria, West Nile, etc. really worth the risks? They may be highly threatening to humans, but ultimately we still have to live here after the mosquitoes are gone...

  4. Re:Genocide by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It saves human lives. fsck the mosquitoes. Did you complain when they eradicated small pox?

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
  5. Re:How about driving their evolution instead? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, for instance, we could create a way to selectively wipe out just the one species of mosquitoes that carry these diseases, while leaving other closely related species unharmed. Perhaps we could make it so that their females can't feed or flee from predators.

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
  6. Re:Nature... will find a way! by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ignorance and superstition. Bats eat insects -- LOTS of insects. They do no harm to society, other animals, or anything else. Little brown bats are insectivores, eating moths, wasps, beetles, gnats,
    mosquitoes, midges and mayflies, among others. You like mosquitos, cockroaches, flies, and moths?

    You wouldn't like your neighborhood without bats.

  7. Re:Nature... will find a way! by evil_aaronm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Be careful what you wish for. There was an article - google it - regarding the number of bats killed by wind turbines and the direct cost increase to farmers who had to increase their pesticide usage in response. Food prices, of course, also go up. Just as killing mosquitoes wholesale would be "bad" for the "cycle of life," killing off bats would be about as bad, I'd guess.

    Personal anecdote: one night earlier this summer, my grand-daughter and I watched a flock of bats at dusk and, though they swooped and came close a few times - we were standing near the pool where the bats would dive bomb to get a drink - they never once threatened us. In addition to being a fascinating show, it was a good lesson for her: bats may -look- scary, but are usually harmless; no need to panic. I'm trying to get her - and her grandmother, and her mother - not to be so frightened by spiders, too, though less successfully.

  8. Re:How about driving their evolution instead? by s7uar7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We need a way to mod someone 'Actually read the article'

  9. Re:Do I get to say... by DRJlaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The issue for me is that these scientists are, making decisions that should be evaluated well before they act, and not just by them, but by a larger audience.

    * * *
    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.

    The irony when I contast your sig and your sudden approval of mass consensus has literally blown my mind. Fortunately, my muscles remained able to type this in the absence of centralized motor control.

  10. Re:Nature... will find a way! by bryan1945 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then you release owls to eat the bats. If the owls get out of control, we'll need to GM a fox into a flying fox to eat the owls. Then GM a flying mountain lion to take care of the flying foxes. Not sure if you can GM a flying bear, though.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.