Slashdot Mirror


Jetman Yves Rossy Flies In Formation With Jets

smitty777 writes "Slashdot has been following Yves Rossy in his previous exploits across the Grand Canyon and his attempts at international flight. He is now flying in formations with real jets. He even does a barrel roll around the two fighters in the video below."

26 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Not really new by squidflakes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a poster calendar in my office from Breitling that shows a picture of Mr. Rossy in formation with four Breitling aerobatic jets from an airshow in 2009.

    1. Re:Not really new by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      I thought I have seen this on one of the history channels programs (disc, his, nat geo group) but this is some cool footage. I wonder how long it took to convince the pilots to let a man with some jets and a wing strapped to his back run formation around their million dollar machines however.Either way, that just looks fun as all hell

      If anything went wrong, I don't think it would be the plane piilots who came off worse.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. I guess that answers my lift question by OverTheGeicoE · · Score: 2

    I always wondered if Rossy's rig actually generated any lift. Now I know.

    1. Re:I guess that answers my lift question by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Look at the jets - flaps down, they're running close to stall speed just so he can keep up. Doesn't mean it's not cool and all, but he's not going at "fighter jet speed!", he's going at "fighter jet trying to fly really slow" speed.

      Cool, but more of a publicity stunt than anything else. Go Rolex!

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  3. What speed? by magarity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a cute promo that he 'flies with jets' but notice they had to have their flaps way out to fly slow enough to stay with him.

    1. Re:What speed? by cbhacking · · Score: 4, Insightful

      According to TFA (crazy, right?) they're flying at "just above stall speed" and the jet-suit is at full throttle doing 120 - 180 MPH. So yeah, it's not like the jets couldn't have left him completley in the dust without really trying, but it's still damn impressive that he can keep up at all. I mean, that's a guy strapped to a bit of carbon fiber and metal, able to reach the (minimum) speed of stable flight for a fixed-wing jet aircraft.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    2. Re:What speed? by Ihmhi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hey man, at least you didn't go the whole "it's not as fast, garbage, blah blah" route. There's a man flying with basically a wing and engines strapped to his back, and all people seem to do is shit all over this awesome feat of engineering rather than appreciate it in any way.

  4. Re:Staged photo by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who is "unimpressed" by a guy with a wing and four jet engines strapped on his back flying in formation with jet planes for no reason other than because he feels like it needs to have his or her geek card revoked.

  5. I think we found someone to beat Chuck Norris by hellfire · · Score: 4, Funny

    The man is simply and totally made of awesome.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:I think we found someone to beat Chuck Norris by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 2

      Balls of Steel.

      Move over, Duke.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
  6. Re:Staged photo by cbhacking · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Eh, I'm fairly impressed that a jetpack can fly in formation with any fixed-wing jet aircraft. Yeah, they're only a little above stall speed, but most manned aircraft even close to the size of that suit's wing can't reach 100 knots at all, much less 180.

    As for the distance, remember that his suit has very little mass to withstand turbulence. Sure, it would be cool to show him nestled between the two planes or soemthing like that, but it would also be extremely dangerous, especially since if something went wrong he's already at max power and they're already at min, which limits the maneuvers either can make. Flying around them close enough to see the pilots is already one hell of an accomplishment.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  7. Re:Staged photo by Squeebee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As opposed to a cameraman who just happened to be flying by as Rossy just happened to be flying by as two L-39C's just happened to be flying by and by some miracle they all wound up in the same shot? The shot is real, the three flew in such a way that all were captured by a single camera shot, nothing more is being claimed from what I can tell.

  8. Re:Staged photo by vlm · · Score: 2

    Eh. Standard /. car analogy: My daily driver could theoretically be a indy 500 pace car. indy500 cars are cool because they're high tech and high performance and all that. My daily driver is cool because it hauls me thru stop and go rush hour traffic with perfect reliability for 13 years now from 110 above to 20 below. I bet it would be fun as heck to drive my car as an indy 500 pace car. But I'm not impressed by mere numerology that there exists a spot on the speedometer below my redline and above their 1st gear idle RPM or that you can take a picture of my car in front of their car .... thats the part of the "eh" I'm talking about.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  9. Re:Staged photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Internet + Modern Science + Pace of change = ridiculously hard to impress people

  10. Lateral thinking my friend.... by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not really about whether this jetman set up can compete with jets, my friend. It's showing that his set up is reliable enough they can take on a stunt like this.... which means it's probably interesting for military special forces for getting their people into places they couldn't get to otherwise.

    - it sells expensive watches, rich people want to believe they are part of the dream, just like kids do when they buy their nikes or adidas
    - it sells the technology to military, who wouldn't really expect it to be used to catch up with real jets and open them up with can openers, they will have other ideas...

  11. Interview at TED talks by mspohr · · Score: 5, Informative
    More information in this TED talk interview with Yves.

    http://www.ted.com/talks/yves_rossy_fly_with_the_jetman.html

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  12. Re:Do you know what Breitling is? by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a world where NASA hasn't been able to get really good funding since the moon landings, are you really going to criticize a guy over a sponsor whose greatest crime is trying to sell you bling bling?

  13. No Capes! by wisebabo · · Score: 2

    I seriously hope if he's flying around jets like that that he doesn't have a superhero cape! ;)

  14. Re:Do you know what Breitling is? by Brooklynoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's probably not quite correct to say that Breitling doesn't "give a shit about science" or that they make "designer watches." Designer watches are what you pick up for $49.95 at Marshall's and toss in the trash when the battery dies. If you've ever held a Breitling, you'd certainly agree that the quality of design and workmanship is orders of magnitude better than a typical "designer watch." Admittedly, the price is also orders of magnitude greater, but you get what you pay for. And there's an enormous amount of both science and engineering that goes into the manufacture of a modern mechanical timepiece. Watch manufacturers are constantly working to develop longer-lasting and more effective lubricants. They develop new alloys to use in escapements to make their watches more resistant to the effects of gravity, magnetism and temperature. They use silicon and other materials in place of metal to reduce both wear and the need for lubrication in their movements. So, I'm thinking that the folks at Breitling probably do give a shit about science.

  15. Re:Do you know what Breitling is? by flosofl · · Score: 2

    So... you're saying this shouldn't be done? Or it should, but only after the sponsors are vetted by you.

    Be sure to forward your email to him. I'm sure he'll sign right up to your newsletter.

    I'll bet you're a real hoot at parties.

    --
    "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
  16. Counterpart to JetMan (speed flying paraglider) by ZermattGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I got to know Yves back in the 90's when he spent some time hanging out here in Zermatt (pre Jet-man days, when he only was doing sky surfing on a scale jet model of the Mirage he used to fly for the Swiss Air Force). Very nice guy. Very intense + focused guy too!

    Here you can see a speed flyer (tiny, tiny paraglider) doing a similar trick with a guy flying a wing suit (in Wengen Switzerland). Kudos!
    B.A.S.E. XRW part one - http://vimeo.com/29231099
    B.A.S.E. XRW part two - http://vimeo.com/30623100

    And this one is just plain cool. Great tune and slick video mix.
    Spitfire Proximity - http://youtu.be/IZ9xoV6sUFc
    (as my flying buddy told me: *the only reason to wear a helmet for these sports, is to have a place to mount your GoPro*)

    1. Re:Counterpart to JetMan (speed flying paraglider) by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but that's not a spitfire. This is a spitfire:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EcCYA68m_w&feature=related

      (this is 16 at once: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6c3v9iihgw)

  17. Re:Staged photo by BaronAaron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your analogy doesn't quite illustrate the risk involved. It would be more like pacing an Indy 500 race with a moped.

  18. Re:Do you know what Breitling is? by blair1q · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Agree. Breitling is the shiznit. As are Omega and IWC. Rolex, on the other hand, is shite.

    Breitling have been supporting aviation for a very long time. Chronographs for pilots are one of their specialties. Back when a watch was a critical navigation tool they were the watch to have. They returned the favor by sponsoring all sorts of aviation competition.

    And really, it doesn't matter who sponsors it. Yves Rossy is the one doing the science on his equipment. His wing could be covered with a giant Orangina logo and it'd still be the single coolest fucking thing in the air.

  19. Re:Do you know what Breitling is? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

    it'd still be the single coolest fucking thing in the air.

    I was going to take issue with this, citing the SpaceShipTwo or an SR-71 or something, but then I realized you're right.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  20. Re:Staged photo by sootman · · Score: 2

    Oblig. Louis CK: Everything is amazing right now, and nobody's happy. He nails it.

    (Jump to 2:00. I'm linking to that because it's much better quality than the copies on youtube.)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.