Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

How Photoshopped Is That Picture?

Posted by timothy on from the pretty-darn dept.

Freddybear writes "Digital forensics experts at Dartmouth have developed software that can analyze digital photos to rate how drastically they have been altered by digital editing techniques. 'The Dartmouth research, said Seth Matlins, a former talent agent and marketing executive, could be "hugely important" as a tool for objectively measuring the degree to which photos have been altered.'"

4 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. Re:It Can Tell by the Pixels by X0563511 · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Nowhere did I make any of those mistakes, except for the extra 'n' in Canon. I will give you that one.

    For the other two? Kiss my fucking ass, AC.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  2. Re:Oh noes: the anti-victoria's secret law! by ElectricTurtle · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    What's the point in fantasizing about average girls? Fantasy is at its best when it is as far from real and achievable as possible... that's why it's fantasy. If you're really fantasizing about average girls you've never even met, you're probably deficient socially. Develop some social skills and get laid in real life.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  3. Re:The system failed... by wdef · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Jackson was murdered by his doctor. It's in bad taste to keep bashing him. Leave him alone.

  4. Re:reliably? by mcgrew · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Reread coldwetdog's comment. Jpeg is lossy, tiff is not. The difference between tif and jpg is the same difference between wav and mp3. You can save a tiff as many times as you like without losing quality.

    --
    Free Martian Whores!