Slashdot Mirror


Using a Tablet As Your Primary Computer

harrymcc writes "Three months ago, I started using an iPad 2 (with a Zagg keyboard) as my primary computing device--the one I blog on, write articles for TIME magazine on, and use to prepare photos and other illustrations that go with my writing. I now use it about 80 percent of the time; my trusty MacBook Air has become a secondary machine."

53 of 627 comments (clear)

  1. Let me be the first to say by bernywork · · Score: 4, Funny

    Congratulations.

    --
    Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    1. Re:Let me be the first to say by xaxa · · Score: 5, Informative

      Conglomeration.

      FTFY.

      Since no one else reads the article, I'll have to explain: it has many incorrect/missing words. It's as if it was written on a phone keyboard, with word completion, or something. "unless I have specific reason to think I’ll never a full-blown computer" "most iPads cost only a few dollars" "Or at least I was at firs–at this point"

      It sounds like what the author appreciates is decent battery life and an efficient small-screen-friendly window manager.

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say by kelemvor4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Conglomeration.

      FTFY.

      Since no one else reads the article, I'll have to explain: it has many incorrect/missing words. It's as if it was written on a phone keyboard, with word completion, or something. "unless I have specific reason to think I’ll never a full-blown computer" "most iPads cost only a few dollars" "Or at least I was at firs–at this point"

      It sounds like what the author appreciates is decent battery life and an efficient small-screen-friendly window manager.

      It really was kind of surprising for an author who claims to be writing for Time magazine.

    3. Re:Let me be the first to say by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Informative

      It really was kind of surprising for an author who claims to be writing for Time magazine.

      Nope. Just an example of why writers need good editors (no, not the Slashdot kind...)

      I've been using the Asus Transformer as my primary content generation tool for some time now. Of course the Asus has the benefit of a decent built-in keyboard, HDMI port, as well as full size USB ports (for mouse and external hard drive), but there's no reason you wouldn't be almost as productive with an iPad.

      I still have a full desktop running Debian as my home machine, but I've often found it just more convenient to hook the Transformer up to mouse, hdd and screen to finish whatever I've been working on. I'll be making sure my next printer is Android compatible, then that desktop might get a bit rusty...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    4. Re:Let me be the first to say by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      Since no one else reads the article, I'll have to explain: it has many incorrect/missing words. It's as if it was written on a phone keyboard, with word completion, or something.

      You could also mention that he uses it in a docking thing with a keyboard so he's using it more like a laptop than a tablet.

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:Let me be the first to say by teslafreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      "unless I have specific reason to think I’ll never a full-blown computer"

      Oh no, you don't think he accidentally a whole iPad do you?

    6. Re:Let me be the first to say by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think "content generation" is a phrase used in a more all-encompassing manner, including writing, music, image manipulation, filmmaking, etc.

    7. Re:Let me be the first to say by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only if he carries the dock around. Otherwise, we could make the argument that a laptop is really more like a desktop just because somebody hooks up a monitor etc to it.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Content generation" is a term used by people to whom the actual content of the content is secondary and is simply a commodity to be "monetized".

    9. Re:Let me be the first to say by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think "content generation" is a phrase used in a more all-encompassing manner, including writing, music, image manipulation, filmmaking, etc.

      "Howard, will you please come out of the bathroom? You've been in there almost an hour!"

      "I can't, Mom, I'm generating content!"

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  2. ...Good for you? by dragonhunter21 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sorry, this isn't a story. This is a blog entry, and a short one at that.

    --
    Sent from my CR-48
    1. Re:...Good for you? by broken_chaos · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is a blog entry, and a short one at that.

      Obviously typing blog posts on an iPad doesn't work as well as the submitter wants to make himself believe.

    2. Re:...Good for you? by hjf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's the 99% I guess.

      I'm an amateur photographer. I upgraded from a Core 2 Duo laptop which was working GREAT (and I still use) to a Core i5... gasp! DESKTOP! Because I like having a 27" monitor and I use the 8GB of RAM and all 4 cores of my CPU to process photos. And of course, USB ports and SD card readers are nice too.

      So, thanks for your suggestions iPad fanboys. I'll stick with my desktop machine for the next few years.

    3. Re:...Good for you? by jrumney · · Score: 3, Funny

      It almost qualifies as a twitter entry. Meanwhile some of us have real work to do which we need our PC's for. We aren't all hipster freelance writers that have nothing to do with our day that can't be done on an iPad while sitting in Starbucks taking up space that should be reserved for paying customers.

    4. Re:...Good for you? by quixote9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously. The OP may want to climb into comments and explain his point. What takes more time to do? What takes less (if anything)? How would it be if you didn't have the extra keyboard? That seems to me to make it a de facto laptop, so you're not really using a "tablet as your primary computer." Or do you not use the keyboard much? Is it more or less convenient to have a separate keyboard? Etc., etc., etc.

    5. Re:...Good for you? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is a blog entry, and a short one at that.

      Obviously typing blog posts on an iPad doesn't work as well as the submitter wants to make himself believe.

      Maybe he should stick to Twitter?

      Seriously, I won an iPad over a year ago. The iPad sits on the nightstand by my bed - 95% of the time, I reach under the bed to retrieve my 13" laptop to do anything, including watching streaming media. The (8 and 10 year old) kids prefer the iPad to an eee Netbook, but only because it's swipey swipey fun to use and seems to be better at grabbing marginal WiFi connections than the Netbook is. I think if the kids had to choose between having a Netbook of their own, or 50/50 sharing the (twice as expensive) iPad, they'd probably go for having their own Netbook. Especially when they want to access Flash enabled websites.

    6. Re:...Good for you? by Cimexus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't think iPads and the like are supposed to replace desktops. But they might replace laptops for some use cases. I have to admit, I pretty much just use my big grunty desktop (serious work, gaming) or my iPad (quick web browsing, email, watching Youtube etc.) now. The laptop is gathering dust. I used to take it when I went on trips but now I just throw the iPad in instead - it's lighter and has better battery life, and it does all I need it to when travelling (basically email, Skype, web) and a few things the laptop doesn't (GPS + maps).

      Having said that I would never use a tablet as my PRIMARY machine (the premise of this thread). Nor would most Slashdotters. A proper PC will always have its place for coding, gaming and heavy duty processing of media (video, audio and photos - as you will no doubt agree). But for the average Joe who just uses their computer to check a few websites and send an email or two, a tablet fits their needs nicely.

    7. Re:...Good for you? by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

      You clearly haven't read the article. The authory states his iPad2 has a neat photo editor. It can resize your pictures and even make them black & white. What else would somebody ever want to do with photographs?
      Clearly the iPad2 can replace your hugely overspecced computer. It may be a bit more expensive than your computer, but you can use it everywhere (provided no sunlight is reflecting in the glossy screen).

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:...Good for you? by AdamHaun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's also a misleading summary. The guy isn't truly using a tablet as his primary computer, because the first thing he does is get a Bluetooth keyboard. What he likes is super-long battery life, built-in mobile broadband, and a clean user interface. Everything tablet-specific -- the touchscreen, the apps, the screen size -- he describes as worse than a laptop.

      --
      Visit the
    9. Re:...Good for you? by hjf · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's no way to tell sarcasm and apple fanboyism apart.

    10. Re:...Good for you? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Most laptops these days have an SD card reader built in anyway."

      You mean a Low speed garbage SD card reader.

      Photographers need a high speed SDHC reader. The external one I have reads a 32gig SDHC in less than 2 minutes. The reader in my alienware will take nearly 20 minutes to read it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:...Good for you? by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know any photographers with only one camera, or only one lens. Why would one computing device be enough?

      A desktop PC with a large screen is great for photoshopping. But it's no use at all when you're out and about doing the photography itself.

      Here's the ways another photographer uses an iPad in his workflow.
      http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/7606

    12. Re:...Good for you? by uglyduckling · · Score: 4, Informative

      Any serious photographer who's doing work for magazines and newspapers will need/want a quad core with 8Gb of RAM. Seriously, if you've spent more than 5 minutes cleaning and processing RAWs for a professional shoot you'll want the fastest machine with the most memory you can get your hands on.

    13. Re:...Good for you? by revscat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > costs on the order of a thousand dollars

      Weasel words. Base model iPad 2 is $499.

      > throws away 30 years of office app development

      Don't care. Don't use Office or any competitor. Do not need it, do not want it.

      > can't play a dvd

      Don't need it to. My iPad has 32gig of storage on it. Right now I have seasons 3 and 4 of the Venture Brothers on there, as well as a few movies for my kids. If that's not enough I can stream stuff from my media server, or from Netflix.

      DVDs are a dead storage medium.

      > can't store more than a couple dozen gigs

      So what? It's not a file server. It's a tablet. It has more than enough storage to do the job. And as mentioned before, streaming options are also available.

      > doesn't allow installation of different OSs

      So what? What if you don't care about installing different OSes?

      > runs anemic, "power-friendly" processors

      Powerful enough to run Lego Harry Potter, watch a movie, or anything else I want to do with it. What are you prevented from doing?

      > can't multitask well

      Same question: what are you prevented from doing? It polls for new emails in the background, if I get an IM I'm notified, etc., etc. What's your bitch?

  3. Have done the same as a developer, sort of by AdrianKemp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My primary mobile development machine is now my iPad2. Using svn hooks and an apple bluetooth keyboard I've managed to quite effectively work remotely.

    SSH is required from time to time, but frankly it's quite seldom once I got all the svn hooks set up correctly

    1. Re:Have done the same as a developer, sort of by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use the SVN client built into iOS and iSSH for my SSH sessions. Works great for me.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    2. Re:Have done the same as a developer, sort of by dingen · · Score: 3, Informative

      He is running his stuff remotely and using the iPad solely as a terminal.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    3. Re:Have done the same as a developer, sort of by hitmark · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I this not what the buzzword pushers have wanted to sell ever since they started talking about "the cloud"?

      Hell, the big boys never wanted people to leave the mainframe world. We just found ourselves in a world where lugging the storage media, and later the whole computer, around was more effective then trying to dial in to work. Now that connectivity have caught up with that, the trends are reversing. Much to the chagrin of the nerds that enjoy "modable" computers.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    4. Re:Have done the same as a developer, sort of by obijuanvaldez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What is the benefit of using something "more powerful" than a console for development? I've yet to meet a graphical IDE that actually works better than vim

      Stop this. Forever. If you need to design GUIs in your software development, a console only approach is undoubtedly inferior. Not using an unquestionably inferior development environment would be a benefit. There are loads of other examples. For some development, absolutely, a console meets the needs perfectly. But different requirements often require different solutions. If you don't know that as a developer, I do not want to use your software.

    5. Re:Have done the same as a developer, sort of by dingen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, that's what is so amazing about all this. It's like the PC never happened.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
  4. Fine then by masternerdguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personal Computers aren't a jack of all trades and a master of none. They are a master of freedom and convertibility, the ability to do whatever you want. Enjoy your tablet, I'm not sure I could.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    1. Re:Fine then by Microlith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      currently an iPad2 is just as open as a machine running Windows.

      The fact that you have to Jailbreak and land on the wrong side of an EULA proves that it isn't.

  5. Expensive and limited netbook by kiwix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So it's like an expensive netbook, but you can only run programs approved by Apple?

    What's the point?

    1. Re:Expensive and limited netbook by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Eh, I was the same way. I shook my head and thought it was silly... that I'd rather get a cheap 12" or 14" laptop.

      Then one day, on a lark, I got some cash and was in the Apple store. I'd been using an iPad at work a lot and figured "what the heck, why not."

      It's nice... not "laptop" nice but it's good. I just use it when chilling on the couch or away from my desk. No hinge/parts means it can take more of a beating. I can do my quick browsing/emailing/etc on a larger screen than my mobile phone (less strain on the eyes). Really, for the most part it's just small stuff like that.

      Biggest advantage is the battery lasts for flippin' ever. This was a life saver when I was without power for a week due to the recent snow storm. Charge it at work, download some shows, and I can watch TV all evening and only lose like 10%-15% battery life. It's also nice on trips, less of a hassle to take one out and start reading / watching / playing something in the confined seats of a plain/train/etc.

      It's nice for some things but I wouldn't recommend it for everyone. If you want a tablet, the Nook and such are probably easier to swallow with their cheaper price.

  6. obviously by locopuyo · · Score: 4, Funny

    No surprise considering his "primary computer" was a macbook to begin with. No real computing was likely done.

  7. Now for something completely different... by PhillC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've tried pretty much the same thing using an Asus Transformer TF101. It has been less than a success.

    Basically the tablet is great for email, which fortunately I write a lot of, but rubbish for office productivity. Word processing, spreadsheets and presentations are all difficult to create and edit with the installed Polaris Office. The original article above mentions Hootsuite. I use Hootsuite for managing my social networks. On an Android tablet, the experience is less than stellar. The Hootsuite app is clearly built for a mobile phone. In a web browser though, Hootsuite is brilliant. Sadly, web browsers on an Android tablet are largely crap at dealing with Javascript. And I've tried pretty much all of them. I need at least 4 (standard Google Android browser, Opera, Dolphin HD and Firefox Beta) to ensure that I will be able to load and interact with all websites I come across. Google Docs also fails in a web browser, and the app is once again mobile phone focussed.

    The battery life of the Transformer is brilliant, especially with the dockable keyboard, which makes writing anything of length bearable.

    A while ago I installed Ubuntu 11.10 as a dual boot operating system. I now use this OS much, much more on the Transformer. It's not perfect and a few things don't work, such as the mini-HDMI out, but when it comes to browsing and office productivity, I find this much more useful.

    --
    Brought to you by the author of such childrens' classics as "Some Kittens can Fly!" and "All Dogs go to Hell."
  8. Her's not using a tablet. by rickb928 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When youd add a physical keyboard to it, it's just not a tablet any more, functionally. It's either a two-piece notepad, or if the keyboard is attached, even with just a cover, it's a notepad period.

    The form factor changes. I expect tablets to be just one piece. A salient feature of a tablet is the LACK of a keyboard.

    But if he was saying that adapting his tablet for everyday uses onle required adding a keyboard, well, doh. This is news for nerds? Not for a few years.

    By TFA measure, my X41t is a tablet. Oh, sure, it needs a stylus and comes with a keyboard, and most of the logic is in the 'keyboard part', but it's touch sensitive (just the touch of the stylus, I know), has an onscreen keyboard etc. and folds over so it's just screen. and the stylus.

    In today's world, it isn't what most people think they mean by 'tablet'. Adding a keyboard muddies this even more.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  9. I've seen this discussion before by poity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And it wasn't pretty Somebody points out that a tablet can only be a good primary computer if one's primary work is non-computer intensive, like an editor with a light workload; use-iPad-for-everything people get defensive about the technical rigor of their work, and computational significance of their needs; comments section gets shut down due to hurt feelings.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    1. Re:I've seen this discussion before by Drew_9999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's almost as though different users have different needs.

  10. I read the article... by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's pretty clear he didn't get anywhere productive until he bought the ZaggFolio keyboard/case. He brings it up as a central point several times.

    Other than that, he states "This hasn’t been one of those experiments-for-the-sake-of-experimentation in which someone temporarily forsakes a PC for another device in order to write about the experience". Of course not. He had to justify his purchase (to himself, I suppose). Why else would he devote a blog post to "Hey look! I can write and take pictures with an iPad!"

    He could just as easily written about blogging/taking pictures and emailing them to himself on a phone - because he bought an external keyboard.

    1. Re:I read the article... by postbigbang · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is someone that doesn't program, doesn't write long docs, is used to surfing a lot, and probably just does blog updates. A tablet is perfect.

      Others with differing job needs would toss that tablet like a TV from a balcony. Except for a few rare ones, tablets can't hold much data, don't have a variety of ports, must download everything (and no DVDs, etc), and most importantly: you can't do a user-changes-battery. Yes, there are exceptions.

      They have tiny screens, and by the time you add an external keyboard, it's back to the size of a netbook. As media consumption devices, they're spectacular. They're less expensive than a Macbook Air, but so is a Porsche 914.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:I read the article... by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is someone that doesn't program, doesn't write long docs...

      I'd suggest that a significant number of real jobs don't require programming or the write-up of long documents. iPads are being used in hospitals and the airline industry. I could imagine a situation where hotel cleaning staff could be managed via tablets which would allow their location and cleaning times to be tracked, as well as their availability for an emergency clean-up. Or as a checklist to be used in an auto shop. Or any place where large amounts of inventory need to be managed?

      Don't get me wrong: I like my laptop. But I do code and I do write long documents on a regular basis. But there are a LOT of people out there who could use a tablet device or tablet+keyboard at a much lower cost and get their jobs done just fine.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  11. I have an iPad with a Zagg keyboard by Stone316 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just some background, I am an Oracle DBA who is oncall every second week. I used to carry around my laptop, power cable and iphone while I was on call. I managed to get my hands on an iPad and used it for light reading, email, etc. I tried to use it while on call but it was too painful. SSH on the thing is nice if your in a bind, but you don't want to be using it for an extended period of time. Just think about trying to use vi, yikes.

    Anyways, I picked up a Zaggmate keyboard for it. I now carry it primarily while I am on call, much easier to tote around than my 17" laptop. Has a better battery life and 3g built in. I don't have to worry about draining my phone at the same time as my laptop.

    However, if I am traveling I take both the laptop and ipad. While the ipad is good for short periods of work, it is still painful for long periods. And its also not suited for alot of tasks, which you don't realize until you actually try to do them.

    So I would agree to a point that 80% of work can be done on an iPad but its that other 20% that kills you. I could also walk to work but that would take an extra 2 hours each way than using my car.

    The macbook air is light, small, easy to carry around. I am not sure why you would use an iPad over it. I've heard quite a few people say the opposite as the guy in the article. Once they bought air's they barely used their ipads. Once you factor in the cost of the keyboard, ipad, your almost at an air anyways.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
  12. Re:!surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because Time magazine's target audience has a sub-90 IQ.

  13. After the KB his main point was by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the master point he made was that it's actually the OS he likes. Or rather the lack of an OS to deal with. No real responsibilities to manage. Just a pure application interface. He also liked the long battery life.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  14. I just saved $2,410 by tepples · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Netbook: $300.
    iPad: $500. iPad keyboard: $50. Cellular data connection at $60 per month for 36 months: $2,160.
    I just saved over $2,400 by switching to a netbook.

  15. Re:Not surprising by goldspider · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think anyone is pushing the idea that tablets can fulfill every need of every computer user. I'm not sure what you are responding to.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  16. iDevice walled garden = no creativity by plurgid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My 13 year old daughter got an iDevice for her birthday (an iPod Touch -- seems like an iPhone without the sim card to me).
    She's had a great time buying idiotic wallpaper "apps" (branded / licensed from her favorite TV shows), and silly games like Angry Birds, etc.
    Also getting Email and wasting time on facebook (and of course buying a playing music).

    This prompted the Dad speech: "when I was your age, we had C-64's. They plugged into the TV and you could write your OWN games".

    Her eyes lit up. "I want to do that" she said. ... she had a couple of amusing ideas for angry birds knock offs.
    Of course, starting from 0 might take a while to get there.

    It started me thinking. The C-64 could suck you into programming real easy. Because with a few one liners you could change the screen color, make some noises, etc etc. It peeled back the curtain a little, and let you see how the thing you just bought worked, and how you could make it do neat things, and it didn't take a lot of effort to get there.

    How in the hell could I even start my daughter down this path today?

    I guess we'd have to download the Apple developer tools, XCode, get some sort of iDevice development license, and ... damn I don't know I guess some sort of iPhone simulator or something to run on the computer to act like it was an actual iDevice (since there's no way in hell you're getting your code onto one outside of the app store).

    If she managed to entertain some enthusiasm through that ridiculous process, then her eyes would glass over as I began to explain how compiling works, header files, etc, etc, etc.

    The greatest thing about computers is that they are creativity machines. You can use them to make just about anything. But these iDevice walled gardens are bullshit mini-televisions or game consoles. You can't DO anything other than consume, or produce approved content: pictures, emails, blog posts, maybe audio.

    I'm disappointed by that. They could be so much more, for a new generation.

    1. Re:iDevice walled garden = no creativity by null+etc. · · Score: 3, Informative

      Download Corona SDK. She can use the trial version to create iOS apps in just a few lines of code, and only needs to pay the $199 Corona fee and $99 Apple iOS Developer Program fee if she wishes to publish her iOS apps to Apple's App Store.

  17. Re:Not surprising by DemonGenius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think anyone is pushing the idea that tablets can fulfill every need of every computer user. I'm not sure what you are responding to.

    You're exactly right, no one is pushing that idea. However, the fact that this is posted on Slashdot (where a disproportionate number of users are software developers, engineers, and other professions that require high powered computing) kinda implies that some of us can replace our desktops with a tablet. We know we can't and never will (unless the conditions laid out by the GP are satisfied), so this is just another one of those articles that are completely irrelevant to this demographic. What's next, links to Cosmopolitan articles?

  18. Not in App Store? Let them eat VNC by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't understand the comparison - how is a cellular data connection any more essential to the ipad than the netbook?

    A netbook lets me run any application I want while offline, regardless of whether or not the manufacturer of the netbook has approved the application. In order to run any application that Apple has not approved on an iPad, I would need to run the application on a remote server and then install SSH or VNC to use it.

  19. Re:Not surprising by marcello_dl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    s/hardcore gaming/gaming/

    It's not a matter of cpu, it's a matter of input devices, i cannot play stuff with a tablet that could be done with a 166mhz mac, simply because i need a keyboard and a mouse or even a wheel more responsive than the accelerometers.

    So, the label hardcore is not proper IMHO, as it implies super cards and rigs, while in reality one might simply want to fire up a pc for an old assault cube.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  20. Re:Not surprising by xaxa · · Score: 4, Informative

    None of the errors pointed out by xaxa actually exist. You got trolled.

    They did when I posted, they have been corrected.

    The author has posted in the comments admitting this.

    Thanks for assuming I'm trolling, but I have better things to do with my time.