Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Java Apps Have the Most Flaws, Cobol the Least

Posted by Soulskill on from the pretend-to-be-surprised dept.

dcblogs writes "An analysis of 745 applications for violations of good architectural and coding practices found that Java applications had the most problems and Cobol-built systems, the least. Some 365 million lines of code were analyzed by Cast Software to assess 'technical debt,' or the cost to fix the violations. Java was calculated at $5.42 per line of code, while Cobol did best at $1.26. Cobol code had the least number of violations because programmers 'have been beating on it for 30 years,' said Cast. As far as Java goes, 'there are many people going into Java now that really don't have strong computer science backgrounds,' said its chief scientist, Bill Curtis."

12 of 435 comments (clear)

  1. so? by masternerdguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That COBOL code has been maintained for like 30 years, it would naturally be rock solid by now.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    1. Re:so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      COBOL also is very inexpressive and requires more lines of code to do the same thing, so saying "dollars per line of code" is not very useful.

      In fact if you ever hear the words "per line of code" you can just assume that you're talking to someone who doesn't actually write code.

  2. Technical Debt by Nittle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In today's agile world, who gets time to maintain technical debt. How does paying technical debt ever give your app that new feature that your marketing department is pushing for -- to have out by tomorrow. I think the rules have changed in how companies push their software development organizations to deliver software. That may be the biggest reason that quality is different than it was. That and the other programs have been worked on forever.

  3. Conclusion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this is no assessment of Java vs Cobol, but of seasoned programmers vs half-skilled newbies.

  4. Java apps are probably most widespread by coder111 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you look at enterprise world (which is what they analyzed) you'll see that either Java or C# are most widely used. Which means most new/inexperienced/crap developers get to work on these projects in Java and C#. Which again means most mistakes & hacks & silliness. All the speciality stuff using exotic languages gets better people. And cobol applications in use today are either really mature and good quality or discarded years ago.

    There are very few good team leads and architects who actually stand their ground and demand both quality from developers and resources to do quality work from their managers... And there are probably fewer managers who understand that quality needs time & resources...

    --Coder

  5. Coding Practices? by Murdoch5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only real coding practices that mean anything are:

    1) Does the program work
    2) Can the program be maintained
    3) Can a normal developer understand your program
    4) Is your program acceptably bug free

    When you start breaking down coding practices into line formatting and variable names and etc... etc... etc.... your no longer programming your doing document management and personally I'm not going to write my embedded systems firmware in word so let me program.

    1. Re:Coding Practices? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I SWEAR I'm not making this up: a manager once criticized my code as being too terse

      And, as a developer who has done code reviews for a long time ... I've had to tell other developers the exact same thing. Because it was too fscking terse.

      In our shop, you needed a comment before your function describing what it was for, magic numbers were strictly verboten, and we expected function/variable names to actually have some descriptive value so we can tell what they're for, and anything non-obvious needed a comment.

      We'd still get functions with three-letter names which were meaningless, variables like "b1" and "b2" which conveyed no information whatsoever, and generally crap code. Those guys didn't last long because they couldn't understand why their code was unusable in a production codebase.

      "people have to read and understand it before they can modify it". He saw no irony in that statement.

      Maybe because there was no irony? I've seen a bunch of young coders who claim that their code is so elegant and obvious as to be easily maintained. I've also shoved the same code back in their face after 3 months and said "fix this", which got me a "what's it do"?

      If you think there should have been irony in his statement, maybe your code isn't very good.

      Always assume that someone half as clever as you think you are is going to be fixing that code with great time pressures and in the middle of a bad day ... because quite likely, even if it's your own code and you fixing it, that will be true. People who act otherwise are likely a liability in the long run.

      I have seen far too many coders who thought they wrote clever code, but after six months couldn't follow their own logic in order to be able to debug it. If the original author can't debug it, WTF is anybody else going to do with it besides rewrite it? (Something I've had to do before.)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. Re:COBOL by laejoh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let me, an old Cobol fart, just answer by repeating: "As if requirements never change".

  7. Re:COBOL by tajribah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Besides, if you have a 1000-line Java program and a 10000-line COBOL program doing the same task, which is going to have less bugs per line? :-)

  8. What the programs do... by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most COBAL applications while do a lot of processing they are not required to do much in terms of advanced coding. We expect more out of Java Programs then we do with Cobal. Java Apps need a cool fancy UI that handles every users whim. While the COBOL app has a menu you type that Item fill those fields and the record and hit process and wait.

    If we were to one for one recreate those COBOL apps in Java without anything new. I will bet those Java Apps will run just as well.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  9. Re:Interpreted languages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here are the languages and numbers of applications submitted for assessment.

    Java EE 339
    Oracle Forms 39
    Oracle CRM 12
    Visual Basic 14
    dotNET 51
    ABAP 59
    C 14
    C++ 9
    COBOL 80
    Other 11
    ____
    total 745

    339 Java, 14 C, 9 C++???

    The sample size and distribution renders all statistical conclusions meaningless! Just another piece of corporate bullshit...

  10. Re:SQL too by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The mysql_escape_string, mysql_real_escape_string, mysql_i_mean_it_this_time_escape_string thing probably has a lot to do with the sql injection vulnerabilities, not to mention that before mysqli, you couldn't even use prepared statements. That and the number of php "tutorials" on the web that don't even mention mysql_real_escape_string or prepared statements, leads to PHP being particularly bad. Add that to the fact that PHP is what is avaiable on cheap web hosts, and that it's the language of choice for many newbie programmers, and you go a recipe for disaster. The SQL injection problem isn't limited to PHP, but PHP probably has the biggest problem with it.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.