Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Best Tablet For Running a Real GNU/Linux Distribution?

bmsleight writes "Android is nice, but I do not want to pay to print or be beholden to the cloud to do everything or chroot. I just want a tablet that can run a MythTv-client, OpenOffice.org and good old apt-get instead of an app market. I have a Joggler — which costs £60 — I'd like something similar but with a battery, a bigger screen, and other modern tablet features. So, what's the best tablet for running a real GNU/Linux distribution (ideally Debian)? Bonus points for the best apt-get-able distribution that works with a tablet."

61 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. Unity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You want to try Unity.

    Tablet owners are the only people remaining i haven't heard complaining about it.

    1. Re:Unity by SausageOfDoom · · Score: 4, Informative

      He was asking what hardware is best suited, not which distro.

      This is something I've been interested in for a while, but haven't found any reasonably-priced tablet (eg same price as a comparative netbook).

      I mostly want mine for myth-frontend and a web browser - although like the OP I'd prefer to run debian/ubuntu, if I find a decent cheap android-only tablet, there is mythdroid:
      http://code.google.com/p/mythdroid/

      It's not a one-click install, and requires MDD on the myth backend, but I'm using it on my android mobile at the moment, and seems to work pretty well (apart from the lack of a menu button when operating as a remote)

    2. Re:Unity by bmullan · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have an ExoPC which is ATOM N450 based. Being Atom cpu Ubuntu 11.10 installed easily and required NO chroot.

      I've looked for quite a while and as far as my searching has found there are no ARM based linux for tablets out there "yet".

      Ubuntu 12.04 (april 2012) is going to support OMAP4 ARM devices. Tegra2 cpu included so alot of the current flock of ARM Tegra 2 Tablets should be able to run it and any derivatives (mint etc) when that is released next spring.

      There's also been alot of work by Canonical/Ubuntu and others that you can find at www.linaro.org

    3. Re:Unity by bmullan · · Score: 5, Informative

      From Intel's AppUP website here is a writeup/guide about how to create a multi-boot environment on the Atom based ExoPC

      http://appdeveloper.intel.com/en-us/blog/2011/07/07/creating-multi-boot-exopc-tablet

      This shows how to multiboot Ubuntu, Windows, MeeGo on the ExoPC.

      NOTE: the ExoPC is exactly the same h/w as the European WeTab tablet. BOTH are made by a subsidiary of ASUS.

    4. Re:Unity by rlees42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The ExoPC is sold through the Microsoft store and is currently on sale for $399 for the 64Gb model. http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msstore/en_US/pd/productID.224518200/parentCategoryID.44066900/categoryID.54536100/list.true I've got one and love it. There is also a healthy community installing alternate OSes on it - including Ubuntu and Meego. http://exocommunity.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=107

    5. Re:Unity by kno3 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read the post fully, the author offers "Bonus points for the best apt-get-able distribution that works with a tablet."

    6. Re:Unity by SausageOfDoom · · Score: 4, Funny

      Read the post fully? You must be new here.

    7. Re:Unity by Mista2 · · Score: 2

      I use an HP tc4400 tablet. A little on the old side, and I only get three eh ours out of the battery, and uses a stylus, but I've been using it as a linux tablet since 2008. I kept wondering what was taking people so long to work out tablets are a great idea for many things.
      I've seen a nice piece of hardware from dell running windows8. That should run well with Linux too. I just can't remember the model, but still low battery life.
      HP have a nice 13" elite book, running with a core i3 CPU, and 6 hrs battery, if only they would make a tablet version of that it would rock. The notebook is only $1300NZ, so removing the keyboard and adding touch shouldnt add too much to the cost.
      Plan B, make my own. Need biggest battery I can find, and an aluminium case to put it in 8)

    8. Re:Unity by bonch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I realize I risk a modbombing of epic proportions by saying this, but you people have completely missed the point of a tablet. The world is moving away from the "tweak everything" mindset of 80s/90s PCs. Tablets are supposed to be the escape from that maintenance nightmare, and you people are trying your damnedest to turn it back into a spec-obsessed nerd playground.

    9. Re:Unity by exomondo · · Score: 2

      Tablets are supposed to be the escape from that maintenance nightmare, and you people are trying your damnedest to turn it back into a spec-obsessed nerd playground.

      If you read the thread the only reason they are discussing hardware is so that they can determine what tablets can run the required software.

  2. Asus Transformer by Jeagoss · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Asus Transformer isn't exactly cheap, but you can run full blown Linux distros on it. I've read of people running Ubuntu on it. I've had Arch Linux running on mine. I went back to Android after a bit just because my OS choices were more for the "cause I could" factor.

    --
    Password Authentication Bypassed for Root
    1. Re:Asus Transformer by scdeimos · · Score: 3, Informative

      You *can* install Ubuntu on it, but it doesn't exactly run well.

      http://forum.xda-developers.com/wiki/ASUS_Eee_Pad_Transformer/How_to_install_Ubuntu

    2. Re:Asus Transformer by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I went back to Android after a bit just because my OS choices were more for the "cause I could" factor.

      Fair enough, but since you mention it, I'm curious as to what you found worked, and what doesn't. I assume that since you went back to Android, Open/LibreOffice isn't high on your scale of must-haves, but did it work at all under Arch on that box? And I presume it's too much to ask for the GIMP to work?

    3. Re:Asus Transformer by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course, there are lots of Linux users who might say that Ubuntu doesn't run well on any platform. ;-D

      *ducks*

    4. Re:Asus Transformer by jordanjay29 · · Score: 2

      Not exactly cheap? I'm not sure what you consider cheap, then. Compared to the Xoom, Tab 10.1 or iPad, $300-400 for the ASUS Transformer tablet+keyboard is pretty cheap. Compared to the same specs for a netbook or full-blown notebook, sure, I'll give you that it's not a cheap device. But it's not an expensive tablet.

    5. Re:Asus Transformer by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah! Who wants a tablet OS for a PC! Oh... Wait... Sorry.

    6. Re:Asus Transformer by s1d3track3D · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funnily enough, System76 states that Ubuntu isn't even ready for a tablet.

      Q: Any possibility of a System76 tablet?
      Sys76: Despite all of the progress towards being a viable option for tablets, Ubuntu currently isn't ready for the primetime as a tablet OS. It has a lot of the fundamentals, but it's missing out on a few key points, like the lack of a software keyboard. There are solutions for software keyboards that do exist, but they are mostly designed for accessibility, rather than touchscreens.

      ubuntuforums

    7. Re:Asus Transformer by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 2

      The vast majority of Asus Transformers sold today are locked down.

      The only Transformers that are rootable are Transformers using the SBK1 key. The vast majority of Asus Transformers sold today use either the SBK2 or SBK2 encryption key to lock down the OS.

      So to those people who have a rooted Transformer. Good for you. You have one of the early ones. But the rest of us are stuck with Android until SBK2 or SBK3 are discovered. So for the time being the Transformer isn't an option (unless you can find an earlier model). You cannot install Linux on a Transformer without the correct SBK. Here's a link of Asus Transformers that cannot currently be rooted.

  3. HP Touchpad by Framboise · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Linux based WebOS is going to be free, as HP announced yesterday, and Ubuntu has been installed on the Touchpad already. In the US Touchpads can be purchased for low price, like $99 on eBay. Outside the US some (for example me) got one for low price through Amazon.

    1. Re:HP Touchpad by anomaly256 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not free per-se.. Open source. There's a distinction ;)

    2. Re:HP Touchpad by Sipper · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've been looking around for something very similar, and I found that you can run "UbuntuChroot" on the HP TouchPad:

            http://www.webos-internals.org/wiki/UbuntuChroot

      This isn't exactly what you're looking for, but it's close. I've specifically been looking at solutions for the HP TouchPad for this since I was given one as a gift. I also would greatly prefer Debian over Ubuntu, and would rather have straight Debian rather than a Chroot, but this is as close as I've gotten so far.

    3. Re:HP Touchpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been looking around for something very similar, and I found that you can run "UbuntuChroot" on the HP TouchPad:

            http://www.webos-internals.org/wiki/UbuntuChroot

      This isn't exactly what you're looking for, but it's close. I've specifically been looking at solutions for the HP TouchPad for this since I was given one as a gift. I also would greatly prefer Debian over Ubuntu, and would rather have straight Debian rather than a Chroot, but this is as close as I've gotten so far.

      Agreed - I do this and it works great. There are a couple of rough edges perhaps getting the best keyboard setup but once you've chosen what you like with that, it works well. I have some crashes with the browsers - both FF and Chrome, but I don't really use it for browsing with under Linux on the TP, rather, for developing on the road when I can't take a full machine with me. Xournal also works great for taking notes, and, yes, you can install printer drivers and software and print from it just fine just like Linux on other systems. You can also install a compiler chain and compile your own code. I needed some updated versions of several pieces of software that were availble via apt-get but a little dated. No problems so far doing that.

  4. Archos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    has dev firmware that is gnu/debian

  5. Thinkpad X201T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok, a tablet PC is not exactly the same thing as a plain tablet, but if you are serious about Linux, then you can't beat a proper laptop that can also be used as a tablet with the keyboard folded down.

  6. Well, Iconia Tab A500, maybe? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a 10" Iconia Tab A500 and I know one can run Ubuntu on it, though I do not know how easy it is to install as I haven't tried it. A500 may not be the best tablet out there, but it sports a pretty good, strong aluminum construction which makes it plenty sturdy, and more importantly it sports a full-size USB-host port meaning that you can plug in all kinds of regular USB-devices. In an emergency you can even charge your cellphone from it.

    A500 has bluetooth, 802.11n support and does have a MicroSDHC slot for expanding storage, but it isn't exactly cheap. And it doesn't come with 3G. If you want 3G then you can use a USB-dongle under Ubuntu or buy A501 which is otherwise the same as A500 but does include a built-in 3G modem (though I don't know if it is supported under Ubuntu, you better google that)

    Other than that I really do not have much to offer though, sorry.

    1. Re:Well, Iconia Tab A500, maybe? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ah, in a reply to myself: apparently you cannot run plain Ubuntu on A500. You can run Ubuntu under Android with e.g. https://market.android.com/details?id=com.appbuilder.u14410p30729 but I don't know if that is useful for anyone else or not, but I feel somewhat tempted to try it myself.

    2. Re:Well, Iconia Tab A500, maybe? by grusapa · · Score: 5, Informative
  7. You do not have to pay to print on Android by stephanruby · · Score: 5, Informative

    You do not have to pay to print on Android, and nor do you need to rely on Cloud Print to print either.

    You just need to install the Android app from the printer manufacturer that makes your printer. That's all. And those apps are all free (with no ads and no paid apps equivalents). You can just think of them as drivers. They'll work through the usb to your computer, through bluetooth, or through wifi.

    1. Re:You do not have to pay to print on Android by obarthelemy · · Score: 2

      ...

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  8. Lifebook T900 by meburke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I love my Lifebook T900 from Fujitsu. I run either Windows 7 or Debian Mint. I like having the power, the screen is a Wacom Tablet, and I can do powerful shit on it. Max RAM is only 8GB at this point, and getting Linux to address all the functions of the Wacom was a challenge (and not quite finished yet), but overall it is a great convertible tablet. My younger brother calls it my $5000 chess board, but the i7 processor gives me some great math and graphics possibilities.

    My second choice would have been a similar tablet from Lenovo. I've used Lenovo tablets before and always found them dependable and very usable with Linux installed. I picked the Fujitsu because it seemed to have more durability features.

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  9. Re:Time is money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    By your reasoning, thinking for oneself takes time, and there are plenty of people offering pre-made opinions (religious leaders, journalists, politicians), so why the fuck would you even consider thinking for yourself? It's just a waste of time.

  10. You could always try ........ by rust627 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You could try the Smart Book from Always Innovating

    www.alwaysinnovating.com

    This is the tablet/netbook convertible that seems to have been the inspiration for the Asus Transformer

    Comes preloaded with AIOS (their own customised flavour of linux), Android, Ubuntu, and ChromiumOS

    I'm hoping to have one soon myself to try.

    --
    da da da dum indeed.
    1. Re:You could always try ........ by rust627 · · Score: 2

      As far as I am aware they have shipped quite a few units of both the current smart book model and the earlier touch book series.

      --
      da da da dum indeed.
  11. Working on it by lkcl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's the thread on debian-arm: http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2011/12/msg00008.html and the corresponding one on arm-netbook: http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/2011-December/thread.html

    The problem that's been made clear time and time again is that if you want low-cost mass-produced hardware, you normally have to go with GPL-violating products (see list here http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/android_tablets/) and that means that you will spend the majority of your time reverse-engineering the product for anything between two weeks and two years, depending on luck and skill, before getting something useful. By the time you're done, the product is usually end-of-lifed: thus if it breaks, you're back to square one.

    The reason for the GPL violations is that the low-cost China-based Factories simply have zero software skills: they're provided with binary-only firmware from an ODM who themselves usually had to sign an NDA from the SoC manufacturer, itself in direct violation of the GPL, in order to get access to the source code. Normally there's a chain of at least *five* companies with whom you have to negotiate with for several days or weeks - each - in order to explain the situation to them, against a precarious balance of them basically not giving a stuff because there's no financial incentive for them to give you anything at all: they're already making money, selling product, so why should they care?

    thus, we logically concluded that the only way to get non-GPL-violating product out there is to go directly to the factories and be the supplier of their software.

    so for the past two years i've been contacting and vetting China-based factories, directly, to find at least one which is prepared to work with us (RH Technology - http://www.rh-technology.com./ the basis of the deal is, "we won't charge you for software expertise if you won't charge us for hardware design costs", and after two years we finally found _one_ factory willing to do a deal, and are looking for more.

    we've also found an absolutely great CPU, called the Allwinner A10, which in mass-volume quantities is only about $7: that means that a PCB similar to the raspberrypi with similar features can be made for about $15 (not $25) and, because the Allwinner CPU is an ARM Cortex A8 not an ARM11 it is at least three times quicker than the raspberrypi's CPU.

    now we have at least 15 Debian Developers who are willing to support the project by buying beta hardware samples, and we're looking for more people to help support this effort, by committing to buy product (just like with the OpenPandora http://openpandora.org./ we have set up a CIC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_interest_company) because it's a better vehicle than a non-profit, charity or profit-maximising company. the CIC is called Rhombus Tech - http://rhombus-tech.net./

    we also have the full support of the Board of Directors of the Allwinner CPU: they released full source code to us in advance. we've made it available and found it to compile successfully.

    in-advance GPL-compliant hardware really is very very unusual. even USA-based companies typically release GPL source code on or after the day that a product is announced. Archos for example made a tablet that used the Telechips TCC8900 series of CPUs, and complied with the GPL (in direct violation of the standard NDA available at the time from the SoC manufacturer!).

    other than that: about the only existing product on the market that i can really recommend to you is the alwaysinnovating touchbook: http://alwaysinnovating.com/ - it's about $300.

    1. Re:Working on it by lkcl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ah, sorry, correction: if you want libreoffice then you can't use the alwaysinnovating tablet - it has a maximum of 512mb of RAM. actually, you'd be hard pushed to find anything! even the CPU we've found maxes out at 1gb of RAM, and libreoffice requires an absolute minimum of 1.5gb of RAM. yes you can use NAND Flash as swap-space but you then risk destroying the NAND flash. yes you could use external USB memory sticks but they're typically slow as a dog. yes you could look for an x86-based tablet with 2gb of RAM but you'll have to shell out at least $500 retail to get one. you're caught between a rock and a hard place, basically! if you can bring your expecations down, such as by using the non-free docs.google.com online service, or perhaps abiword and gnumeric, you'll be ok.

    2. Re:Working on it by lkcl · · Score: 5, Informative

      ok there are two answer. the first is for the EOMA-compliant module *only*.

      1) we'd like to keep it somewhere between $75 and $100 for the very early runs, and it looks like we're set to achieve that. it seriously depends on the quantities, and on how much profit people would like the CIC company to make (yes, CICs can work that way whereas Ltd Companies cannot be trusted with that kind of strategy).

      the NREs (non-recurring expenses) by the factory will be about $2,000, and that excludes hardware engineer's time because we've done this "you don't charge us for hardware engineering time and we won't charge you for software engineering time" deal.

      we have people committed to buying about 17 units so far: if that gets to 30 then the costs are down to $75 per unit (just for those initial 30). after that, there are no more NREs, and the unit cost can, assuming large volume, approach the mass-volume price of $15.

      of course... that's excluding other parts which is answer 2:

      2) it's best to go on mass-volume retail cost, unless you'd like to help dominic (debian developer, see debian-arm mailing list) make one using the EOMA-compliant CPU card which is where most of the difficult work (CPU-to-DDR RAM etc.) will already have been done.

      mass-volume retail cost for something that even includes a capacitive touch panel can be as low as $130, but i know from experience that there's at least a 60% markup on the BOM, possibly even more. here's a link to a discussion: http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/2011-December/001136.html and please note that the example product will be yet _another_ GPL-violating tablet, absolutely guaranteed.

      to work out the BOM you have to factor in the following costs, assuming mass-volume pricing: EOMA-PCMCIA-compliant CPU module about $15, 2000mAh battery $8, 7in 800x600 LCD $15, resistive touchpanel $5, main motherboard including WIFI module about $8, case (excluding *massive* NREs) about $3 - comes to a total of $39. yes, really - $39.

      if you want a capacitive touchpanel instead, add an extra $15 because capacitive touchpanels, being also made of glass and having to be thicker than LCDs, are at least 25% more expensive than the LCD underneath them! but you can see, even with a capacitive touchpanel the BOM only comes to about $55.

      so basically, you can see that a mass-volume retail cost of about $80 for a 7in tablet with the Allwinner A10 and a resistive touchpanel would be quite reasonable, and about $130 for one with a capacitive touchpanel would also be quite reasonable.

      apologies for answering in a rather indirect and roundabout way, which i'm sure you would appreciate given that this is slashdot, and that i'm not working for a profit-maximising company that is primarily motivated to do anything including lie to you in order to get your money.

    3. Re:Working on it by lindi · · Score: 2

      Where do you get this 1.5 GB requirement? 3.4.4 seems to have an RSS of 80 MB immediately after startup.

    4. Re:Working on it by lkcl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I appreciate the fullness of the answer.

      no problem.

      What will it cost to do something with the dev module? At least through the network?

      ok, one idea i'm advocating is to adapt arduino-like schematics to connect directly to the EOMA-PCMCIA-compliant interface. as such projects are usually a 2-layer board, very low-cost and the schematics are available under Open Source Licenses, it's a no-brainer. probably the best one to pick is the Leaflab's Maple: http://leaflabs.com/devices/maple/ because in mass-volume the CPU is around $1 to $1.50 (the 48-pin version not the 100-pin version!)

      as this CPU is so low-cost, but importantly also so highly functional, its use substitutes and strategically "normalises" Motherboard designs. the plans being discussed at the moment include using the STM32F to do Audio (because of the D/A and A/D converters), battery monitoring (A/D converters), LCD Backlight control (PWM), resistive touchpanels (A/D converters again), keyboard matrix (8+8 GPIO) - someone's already written a mouse driver so at least that doesn't need to be done :)

      so yes: if you're interested, look up the cost of arduino-like devices. at least for prototyping purposes you could just get an off-the-shelf leafpad maple and connect it directly to the EOMA-PCMCIA-compliant CPU card even with a few bits of wire, in a pinch.

      anway, here's a link to some example motherboards that have been designed: http://elinux.org/Embedded_Open_Modular_Architecture/PCMCIA#Example_Motherboards
      that includes a "micro" engineering board (that's nothing more complex than an adaptation of existing leafpad maple schematics) as well as something that's similar to the IMX53QSB, Beagleboard, Pandaboard and Origen etc.

      Your price targets sound delightful. Might as well mark it up another $20 so you can fund the next version too. Or if the money could be spent on making it more rugged, that would be well-spent.

      If the CPU is as fast as you say then there might be more interest in the dev module than you'd think.

      yes, that's the plan :) would love to have some brainstorming ideas written by people on the possibilities, hmmm... let me just create a wiki page: http://rhombus-tech.net//community_ideas

    5. Re:Working on it by lkcl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ok, so if I understand, the problem lies in the binary firmware blobs the ODM gets from the SoC maker, making it hell from that point on to install any distro lacking those drivers.

      it's worse than that: you can't do security updates yourself, and if there's a bug you're screwed - you might as well throw the hardware away. the reason is that the ODMs are having such a hard time keeping hold of the limited supply of competent software engineers within china that they can't _do_ "updates": even if the factory asked for one, the ODM is forced to try to sell them the "latest hardware design" because the software engineer who did the firmware for the old device has quit and got a job somewhere else, better paid, with "old device X" on his CV!

      And if they are included in the kernel without source code, it violates the kernel's GPL.

      correct.

      So the SoC maker doesn't violate the GPL, the ODM does,

      actually... there are a number of SoC manufacturers that do. given the serious consequences to them of doing so (GPLv2 requires permission from *all* copyright holders for reinstatement of distribution rights), i am often stunned when i learn of a SoC manufacturer that is involved in GPL violations.

      but the ODM never had the source to begin with.

      often they do, but it's also often under NDA (which is a GPL violation by the SoC manufacturer). we have actually jeapordised a relationship with one ODM because we went "oi!" to the SoC manufacturer, pointing out the SoC manufacturer was in GPL violation, and this went down so badly that the SoC manufacturer refuses to provide that ODM with *any* source code! it's a real serious mess, basically.

      I am beginning to understand what a mess the current fragmentation of designs has caused. I am glad there are people like you out there working towards bringing products to the market that preserve the spirit of true ownership, rather than feeling like a rented appliance.

      appreciated.

      I have been monitoring the Rasberry pi site for months waiting to grab a one from the first batch, but I will be keeping an eye on Rhombus tech now too. The PCMCIA approach is one I have not seen before though, interesting.

      yeah - it's just at the right time. PCMCIA is dead, but with things like Conditional Access Modules for Satellite boxes, the actual PCMCIA connectors and assemblies are still being manufactured in mass-volume quantities. so we get the best of both worlds.

      the thing is that a credit-card size is coincidentally the exact same size (to within a few millimetres) as a PCMCIA card. so the difference in price comes down to that of the CPU, and the Allwinner A10 is $7 in mass-volume. for a 1.5ghz Cortex A8. which is stunning. that means that qualcom's 700mhz ARM11 is going to be at least $12, possibly even as high as $15. it's really hard to see how a USA-based company, with the USA-based overheads, could possibly compete with the Taiwanese and China based SoC manufacturers.

    6. Re:Working on it by lkcl · · Score: 2

      yes it's the standard MALI 400, so the situation is the same as for all other MALI GPU SoCs, which is worth repeating here because it's often misunderstood.

      * yes there's a GPL "shim" driver available, which allows the userspace /usr/lib/libgl.so.2 library to communicate with the GPU
      * yes there's a user-space library that is proprietary *but* it qualifies under the GPL exemption clauses as a "System Library"
      * yes there is full *user* documentation available from ARM, as part of their standard SDK, etc. etc.

      so, none of this is _actually_ anything to do with the SoC manufacturer themselves: all they really have to do is grab the Reference GPL "shim" Driver source code from ARM, make sure it compiles, grab the standard SDK from ARM and ship the binary proprietary libgl library along with making sure that android compiles against it, call the whole lot a "Reference Platform" and their job is done.

      anyone who wants to step outside of those boundaries is pretty much on their own. but that's ok, because working out the above and taking it from there is a piece of cake compared to reverse-engineering actual hardware :)

    7. Re:Working on it by obarthelemy · · Score: 2

      have you thought of building a device with a non-touch screen ? Resistive is unusable, capacitive is too expensive. There's a market for an all in one, portable computer, with an external keyboard/pointer.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  12. Archos by lowieken · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have a look at Archos tablets. They support Debian on their gen8 series, but those are still a bit slow. People are already running debian on their gen9 products, and official support for that is coming soon.

    See also:
    http://www.archos.com/support/support_tech/updates_dev.html?country=us&lang=en
    http://dot.kde.org/2011/11/30/plasma-active-archos-g9-tablet
    http://dev.openaos.org/wiki/Debian

  13. Its called a "laptop" by itsdapead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously - the best system for running an OS and applications designed for a reasonable sized screen, physical keyboard and pointing device is one with... a decent-sized screen, physical keyboard and pointing device. Conversely, if you want a truly handheld device with no keyboard and a touch screen, you want a system and apps designed specifically for that environment.

    That's one of the reasons why the iPad succeeded and previous Windows-running tablets didn't. I got an iPad because I was finding my iPod touch and Android phone very useful for certain things and could see a use for a larger version, not because I wanted a replacement for my "proper" computers.

    OpenOffice would be hell on a tablet - I'm sure you could get it running, but its just not designed to be usable in that mode.

    A MythTV front end for tablets would be terrific - if the UI were re-designed for touch operation: currently its really designed for a remote control or keyboard. Of course, you'd also have to worry about which video formats enjoyed hardware acceleration since your tablet CPU might not be up to software-only decoding (some existing solutions transcode stuff on the server side so the tablet can run them).

    So, I guess the Asus Transformer sounds like a contender - but the whole point of that is that you can always disconnect it from the keyboard and use it handheld: if most of your software is going to require the keyboard then why not save your cash and get a netbook?

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    1. Re:Its called a "laptop" by itsdapead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also if you are claiming openoffice is unusuable on tablet then I assume the only reason is the lack of KB and mouse, since I use OO plenty comfortably on a 10.1" netbook, and I think the transformer solves that issue rather neatly.

      Yes, and its a big reason. Apart from the gross differences (losing half your screen to an on-screen keyboard, the loss of precision of fingers c.f. a mouse requiring everything to be bigger - eating more screen real estate) the "language" of using a touchscreen is significantly different from that of a mouse, or even a trackpad with gestures (e.g. no concept of clicking, or moving the pointer without clicking vs. dragging). Maybe "unusable" is too strong, but definitely inferior to using an application in the medium for which it was designed.

      I think the transformer solves that issue rather neatly.

      Except you're paying a considerable premium over a netbook for the ability to leave the keyboard behind when you don't need it. If you are primarily using traditional applications, that keyboard is going to be a permanent fixture and the overall ergonomics of a netbook may be better. Maybe you'll get better battery life using "tablet" technology (assuming your "regular" Linux distro doesn't bork the power management on your tablet).

      To be fair - I agree that the Asus Transformer is about the only non-iPad tablet that interests me.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  14. OpenOffice, POI etc. by Dennis+Sheil · · Score: 2

    I think I'll take your mention of OpenOffice off on a tangent to do a little plug of my free software project...

    A few months ago, I began the process of trying to port Apache POI to Android. For those who don't know, Apache POI is "the Java API for Microsoft Documents". It does Word and Excel, and also tries to implement other Microsoft formats, with various degrees of success.

    I decided to start with a spreadsheet. I spent two weeks writing some scaffolding for a spreadsheet in Android. When I got it to where it looked good enough, I began working on loading Excel files with POI. And I could do so - with Excel xls files up to 2007. When I tried to load Excel 2007 and 2010 xlsx files, I ran into some problems...a topic which I'll get back to in a moment. Anyhow, I worked on trying to load Excel 2007/2010 xlsx files for a few more weeks, and when I saw I wouldn't, without luck, make any immediate breakthroughs, I put it aside. A few months later I open sourced my code on Github and cursorily described my 200/2010 problem in the README file. If anyone wants to look at it, feel free. As I said, I worked on features for two weeks and then got hung on one the 2007/2010 xlsx problem. The one big feature I did not include in the spreadsheet is the ability to finger swipe through the spreadsheet rows and columns - you can look around the spreadsheet with the arrow buttons on old, old Android phones and the Android emulator, but I spent all my time working on Excel 2007/2010 xlsx instead of features like that. It's only two weeks worth of work (plus the 2007/2010 xlsx work), and that minus my last six months of Android knowledge, but it's decent enough for what it is.

    I sent a message to the POI mailing list after posting the code on Github. One of the POI dev's made a suggestion as to what to do - strip all non-Excel functionality from the schemas file - but that was what I already had for the most part done. I say for the most part because I probably stripped more than 80% of the non-Excel code. Why did I need to do this? Because Android Dalvik executables have a 65,536 method limit, and with all the Apache POI XSSF required libraries to do Excel 2007/2010 xlsx files included, my program would exceed that limit. Now there are two paths to get around this. One is the easier path - strip 100% of the POI stuff unneeded for Excel compatibility from the POI schemas jar. But I already stripped the low hanging fruit of this, and whittled 80+% of that stuff from the schema. Unless the other

    Anyhow, back in July, when I stripped 80+% of the low-hanging fruit non-Excel schema and it was still a no-go, I put this aside and began working on other Android projects. In October I began thinking about this, and realized I was not going to get back to it in a while, so I cleaned it up (a little bit) and put it up on Github under the Apache 2.0 license (POI is Apache 2.0 so I figured I'd just use that as well), and posted to the POI mailing list.

    I've had enough Android projects, and non-Android projects and things to distract me from returning to this. If my attention was turned to this again, the first thing I would do would be to repeat my 80+% non-Excel POI schema cleaning with the latest POI trunk (or last released jar, or whatever) and make my results public on a web page, or the POI mailing list or something. I would try to get it from 80%+ to 85+% and up to 100% clean of everything unneeded. If that didn't work, I would see if I could strip stuff from some of the other jar's, like xmlbeans or something.

    If all of this didn't work, I would go the way of two Dalvik executable files in one Android project. With custom class loading, an interface for each needed method and all of that. An effort I seriously doubt I would start on my own - but who knows? If others were interested in this, I might put some more time and effort into it when I can. It would be nice to have a free software Excel-compatible spreads

  15. Re:Time is money by benjamindees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are far too many idiots on /. lately.

    The point of Linux, and of Open Source in general, is that the vast majority of time one spends on a computer is not the day (or few days even) it takes to install an OS. The vast majority of time is spent developing that OS into something useable in day-to-day work. And the most time-efficient way of doing that is to get a freely-modifiable operating system into the hands of as many people as possible, give them the means to collaborate, and enable them build the most effective tools and programs possible.

    Do you see the step in that process that requires the OS to be used by as many people as possible? That's what we're discussing. An OS that only runs on expensive hardware doesn't meet that requirement.

    Linux is a community OS. Members of a community voluntarily act in ways which tend to subsidize the group, even when it may not appear to outsiders to be in their individual interests, because it is in their best interests in the long run.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  16. Cautiously optimistic about Archos G9 by migla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The new generation (G9) Archos tablets look promising for running a more GNU/Linux than Android distro on them.

    KDEs Plasma Active, on top of MER is being worked on:

    http://dot.kde.org/2011/11/30/plasma-active-archos-g9-tablet

    And the general philosophy of Archos seems to be encouraging development of alternative firmwares (not without loosing warranty, though):

    http://www.archos.com/support/support_tech/updates_dev.html?country=us&lang=en

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
  17. A SmartBook might do by minkanjin · · Score: 2

    www.alwaysinnovating.com has a open source hardware tablet. It's where Asus got the idea from. It's compatible with any distro that supports ARM

  18. Get a pre-tablet-craze windows tablet from ebay by Tom+Goodale · · Score: 2

    A few years ago I got a Compaq TC1000 from eBay. It ran linux flawlessly, although it needed the proprietary nvidia driver to get screen rotation. This was long before the iPad, the current tablet craze or much thought of special operating systems for tablets (ok, it came with a special mobile edition of windows, but their wasn't much difference). Now the TC1000 is low power for today's needs but I'm sure there must be lots of tablets out there with a higher spec that people are offloading because they want an iPad or equivalent. They may not have capacitive touch-screens but otherwise would probably be ideal for you.

  19. Re:Having a tablet.... by migla · · Score: 2

    And having type apt-get in to install an app totally defeats the point of the touchscreen input mechanism and UI, what you want is a MacBook air or other thin laptop.

    No, it doesn't. You won't be spending the bulk of your time apt-getting packages on the thing. But for when you do, if the tablet has a real USB port, you could use a normal keyboard, or you could ssh into it.

    The apt-getability implies ease of installation and freedom of configuration.

    Once you have it setup with for example KDEs Plasma Active gui just the way(s) you want it, you proceed using it in a tablet-like manner, at the same time feeling happy about being a (at least figuratively) bearded champion of Freedom and transparency, the main tenets of democracy.

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
  20. can someone translate this for me? by decora · · Score: 2

    i tried, i really did. i even tried google translate.

    1. Re:can someone translate this for me? by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Sure, this guy wrote code to handle modern Excel 2010 files in Java on Android. Unfortunately it won't run because of a stupid arbitrary limit in Android. The author is too busy to fix it, but the code is out there and he roughly outlines what needs to be done in case someone wants to pick it up.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  21. DO NOT BUY FROM ALWAYS INNOVATING by JoSch1337 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I pre-ordered a smartbook in february 2010 (!!) and there is nothing there yet.

    Forums are dead.

    IRC is dead.

    No reply to any email you send to them.

    Dont bother with this company!

  22. Debian on the Notion Ink Adam by JoSch1337 · · Score: 2
  23. Re:Time is money by ccanucs · · Score: 2

    You can compile on the TP using UbuntuChroot. C/C++/Perl/Prolog/Python - name your language. All work just fine. You can also install a similar chrooted self-contained Linux on Android. The problem with Android is the need to have a properly rooted host environment and not all kernels allow that easily. I ran into that with binding sockets as a non-root user on a 7" tablet. E.g. I could run ssh (client) as root, but not as a user. This is a problem - explained by the author of the chrooted Linux for Android - with the way Android host rooting works. The same problem does not occur on chroot on WebOS. Of course, if you are talking a native environment on an Android-capable machine, you would not have those issues - certainly. You can also add whatever repositories exist for arm by editing the apt config files.

  24. Re:x86 or ARM? by ccanucs · · Score: 2

    No, it works just fine if you set up the VNC X server and connect via a VNC client from the native Android. Worked with that on a 7" tablet just fine. You can install KDE and Gnome - if you have the memory - and they also work. Even if you install a lesser windows manager, you can still install and run the libraries and apps that depend on them from Gnome and KDE on a chrooted environment under Android. Works great. Takes a few seconds to type apt-get... LXDE is recommended though for compactness and is a very nice lean window manager.

  25. Re:Time is money by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

    Even if you are lucky and Linux installs with no hitches, you will waste a day. If things don't go smoothly, which is far more common than the Linux community admits, expect to waste 3 days to a week.

    Bullshit... I have never had a Linux install take longer than a Windows install, even with "problems." Generally, a Linux install takes less than an hour. Two hours if there is an odd graphics or WiFi bug. Windows takes 3 minimum, and often more if you need odd drivers.

  26. Re:Having a tablet.... by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

    ...what you want is a MacBook air or other thin laptop.

    So glad you have the ability to figure out what people actually want. Now go get a job at Apple or Microsoft so they actually start making the things we want.

  27. Not a Tablet by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 3, Informative

    My setup is not a tablet, but it's very portable and flexible and runs a pretty much fully fledged Ubuntu install any time I want to. It also keeps the number of gadgets I carry around and thus synchronize to a minimum.

    The basic part of my setup is a Motorola Atrix (http://www.motorola.com/Consumers/US-EN/Consumer-Product-and-Services/Mobile-Phones/Motorola-ATRIX-US-EN) with the Lapdock (http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/accessory-details/?LOSGId=accessoryBucket&q_sku=sku5100298#fbid=GYMvsMM9JQx). To that I then used Webtop2SD (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1119555) to move my Webtop environment to my 16GB SD card on its own dedicated 4GB partition and then did the work to create a full Ubuntu on Webtop (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1000316). Of course, I had to root the phone but that was dead easy... in fact all of the above steps I did in about an hour while sitting at my dining room table drinking my coffee on a Saturday morning.

    It's not perfect... I'll admit that. It's slow compared to a laptop but in terms of functionality it's excellent. I can apt-get or run synaptic from my command line, and I added a small Gnome toolbar on the left side of the screen that contains my standard Gnome menu. I can surf the web, write articles in OpenOffice and I am not at the mercy of WiFi in order to be able to access the Internet. The Lapdock contains a battery that charges the phone while it's docked, and so I have gotten several hours of work done without needing to recharge either, and by the time I was done my phone was fully charged anyway.

    The beauty part was that I was able to then go home and slap my phone into my Multimedia Dock (http://www.amazon.com/Motorola-Multimedia-Dock-ATRIX-Packaging/dp/B004LWYYZ0) which is hooked up to my 23" widescreen monitor and has a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse and there was my desktop again like it had never left.

    I recently flew about 900 miles from home to get a new car (BMW Performance Center Delivery - http://www.bmwusa.com/Standard/Content/Experience/Events/PDS/BMWPerformanceCenterFAQ.aspx) and drove all the way home, and all I took with me was my Atrix and Lapdock as well as my cameras and I was able to use them to move pictures and videos to a USB stick temporarily to clear up space on the cameras, as well as use it to check into email and so on. If I'd needed to I could even have dialed into work thanks to our Citrix XenDesktop environment that works like champ on the Lapdock. Thankfully that was unnecessary as it would have really detracted from my driving my new BMW on the Tail of the Dragon (twice!) and the Cherohala Skyway (which I videoed both of them using my ContourGPS video camera and car mount).

  28. lil' debi by eighthave · · Score: 2

    We've made a Debian chroot installer and manager app for Android, so you can have a Debian chroot running in parallel with Android. You can apt-get anything in Debian/arm. We're interested in server software, so we haven't tried anything beyond things like ssh, nginx, jabberd, etc.

    https://guardianproject.info/code/lildebi/

    And the code is up on Github:
    https://github.com/guardianproject/lildebi

  29. Re:Time is money by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

    Yes, they should. ;)
    http://www.factoryfive.com/