Slashdot Mirror


Iran Wants To Clone Downed US Drone

PolygamousRanchKid sends this quote from the LA Times: "The Obama administration has sent a formal diplomatic request asking Iran to return the radar-evading drone aircraft that crashed on a CIA spying mission this month, but U.S. officials say they don't expect Iran will comply. 'We have asked for it back,' Obama said Monday at a news conference in Washington with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki. 'We'll see how the Iranians respond.' His comments marked the first public confirmation that the RQ-170 Sentinel drone now in Iranian hands is a U.S. aircraft, though U.S. officials privately acknowledged that in recent days. Iran has claimed it downed the stealthy surveillance drone, but U.S. officials say it malfunctioned. Capture of the futuristic-looking unmanned spy plane has provided Tehran with a propaganda windfall. The government announced that it planned to clone and mass produce the bat-winged craft for use against its enemies." Iran has also demanded an apology from the U.S. for the drone flight in its airspace.

117 of 663 comments (clear)

  1. Now these guys have some balls by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Obama administration has sent a formal diplomatic request asking Iran to return the radar-evading drone aircraft that crashed on a CIA spying mission this month

    Getting caught and then asking to return their spying device, lol.

    1. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Fallingcow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, it's kind of like throwing a baseball through someone's window then asking for the ball back.

    2. Re:Now these guys have some balls by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      A better analogy might be a peeping tom throwing a camera through someone's window and then ringing the doorbell to ask for it back.

      You'd be surprised how often that works, BTW.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Now these guys have some balls by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Getting caught and then asking to return their spying device, lol.

      Like the Russians asking for their MiG-25 back (they got it in boxes after much study), or the US asking China for it's EP-3 orion back (we got it and it is still flying today).

    4. Re:Now these guys have some balls by dittbub · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It also takes balls to ask for an apology for receiving a very nice gift.

    5. Re:Now these guys have some balls by BitZtream · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I never had a problem asking for the ball back.

      I also never had a problem paying for the damages by working it off for them. Its called being accountable for your actions.

      What did you do? Run off and hide while the poor bastards window was replaced at his expense?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:Now these guys have some balls by synapse7 · · Score: 2

      Maybe he is making an attempt at relations. I highly doubt if Iran does not hand it over that the Gov/Military will allow them to continue to have it. What is more interesting is whether the drone actually malfunctioned on its own or the Iranians were able to cause the malfunction.

    7. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Moheeheeko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ACTUALLY Its more like putting a camera on the fence looking at your neigbors yard, and they rip it down, and then asking for it back.

    8. Re:Now these guys have some balls by forkfail · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, it's like parking your car on the street in front of your neighbor's house and having them tow it on to their yard and put it up on blocks.

      (Well, somebody had to make the car analogy....)

      --
      Check your premises.
    9. Re:Now these guys have some balls by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What a competent president would have done is sent another drone to destroy it so the technology didn't fall into the hands of every enemy state in the world.

      Yeah, an act of war against a foreign nation after they shoot down your spy drone that was in their airspace sounds like a great plan. Particularly when they're one of the world's largest oil suppliers and gas would probably hit $10 a gallon.

    10. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually its more like flying a drone into someones airspace and having it crash, and then asking for it back.

    11. Re:Now these guys have some balls by codemachine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually in this case, the camera would've been hiding right in the neighbor's yard.

      Iran: Is this your camera? What is this camera doing here?
      US: Nothing. but can we have it back?

    12. Re:Now these guys have some balls by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, because a competent President would have started World War III rather than give up a single lousy drone.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:Now these guys have some balls by gsnedders · · Score: 5, Informative

      The MiG-25 was obtained by the West after a Russian pilot defected, aircraft and all. It had nothing to do with a Soviet aircraft being in airspace without permission.

    14. Re:Now these guys have some balls by eclectus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or like Law enforcement putting a tracking device on your vehicle and asking for it back when you go public with it.

      --
      This signature is a waste of 42 characters
    15. Re:Now these guys have some balls by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      ACTUALLY Its more like putting a camera on the fence looking at your neigbors yard, and they rip it down, and then asking for it back.

      Well, according to the Iranians, it's more like putting a camera in your neighbors tree and them finding it and keeping it.

      Given that the US has sent drones into Pakistan without telling them, it wouldn't entirely surprise me if this actually was sent into Iran's airspace.

      Then again, given how bat-shit crazy Iran seems to act, I'm not sure I put a whole lot of stock in their version either.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    16. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Talderas · · Score: 3, Informative

      Surprisingly yes. So far the claims from the US coalition have been that the drone was lost somewhere over western Afghanistan and not in Iran. The truth of that statement can be called into effect but it would be like flying a remote controlled helicopter around your yard that crashed into your neighbor's yard.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    17. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Talderas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forget the fact that they are one of the largest oil exports. Don't ignore the fact that they can close the Straight of Hormuz which would choke off the oil supply coming out of THE LARGEST oil supplier.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    18. Re:Now these guys have some balls by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      I prefer the ubiquitous political cartoon.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    19. Re:Now these guys have some balls by DaHat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it is an act of war against a foreign nation... what do you call it when several helicopters full of navy seals are sent into a foreign nation to kidnap or kill an individual who is living there with the implicit permission of the host nation, killing anyone who resists, taking the body of the target out... all without notice or permission of the host nation?

      Do you really want to play a game of "lets pick and choose what we call an act of war"?

    20. Re:Now these guys have some balls by cblack · · Score: 2

      Dick Cheney has criticized Obama's handling of this incident, saying that he should have ordered an airstrike immediately to prevent the tech from falling into Iranian hands. Sounds pretty crazy to me.
      Also, upon further reading it sounds like the designers may have purposely avoided sensitive cutting-edge technology due to the high probability of a single-engined UAV failing over enemy territory.

    21. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, that was just grand theft airplane.

    22. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Lashat · · Score: 2

      Doesn't Saudi oil go out of the Red Sea and the Suez Canal as well?

      --
      For every benefit you receive a tax is levied. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
    23. Re:Now these guys have some balls by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually its more like flying a drone into someones airspace and having it crash, and then asking for it back.

      Actually, it's more like ... wait a minute.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    24. Re:Now these guys have some balls by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This analogy is definitely the winner.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    25. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Creepy · · Score: 2

      Well it wouldn't be completely unprecedented, as I'm fairly sure we've blown up in-development nuclear enrichment facilities before with cruise missiles. Iran is already being threatened with a boycott of their oil by Europe, one of the main consumers of their oil. The larger problem is Iran's threat to perform live fire maneuvers in the Strait of Hormuz, blocking around 17% of the world oil supply from being able to reach Europe and Africa.

    26. Re:Now these guys have some balls by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now that's just a police action, there's a difference. Hell if I know what it is.

    27. Re:Now these guys have some balls by jpmorgan · · Score: 2

      Well, the US claims it was in Afghanistan. But I'm sure it was in Iran, just like those British sailors the Iranians abducted a couple of years ago.

      I'm not American, but you have to be a complete moron to think the Iranian government is more trustworthy than the US. If it comes down to he-said/she-said, I'm willing to give the Yanks the benefit of the doubt. Iran has a history of "flexible" borders.

    28. Re:Now these guys have some balls by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well it wouldn't be completely unprecedented, as I'm fairly sure we've blown up in-development nuclear enrichment facilities before with cruise missiles.

      Where? The closest I can remember was blowing up a pharma factory in some African nation which couldn't fight back. Sudan?

      Iran is already being threatened with a boycott of their oil by Europe, one of the main consumers of their oil.

      A pointless exercise, because China will be happy to buy all the oil they can get.

    29. Re:Now these guys have some balls by budgenator · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually I'm surprised that the drone didn't have a failsafe self destruct, the missile that I worked on had one; if it lost a certain classified signal for a classified length of time the warhead would detonate. One would think that with all of the classified coatings, sensors, avionics and airframe it would have been rigged to the gills.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    30. Re:Now these guys have some balls by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the Iran's caused it, it would have had to been a disruption of some sort to avoid much damage to the drone. While we know that the downlink from drones tends to be unencrypted (for good reasons)

      Out of curiosity, what are the good reasons for not encrypting the downlink?

    31. Re:Now these guys have some balls by superdave80 · · Score: 2

      ...they can close the Straight of Hormuz...

      So they are going to claim that they own the water all the way up to the shore of Oman? Unlikely.

    32. Re:Now these guys have some balls by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

      Now that's just a police action, there's a difference. Hell if I know what it is.

      It's a police action if the President can't get a Declaration of War out of Congress but does it anyway.

      Sort of like Libya. Or the crap going down in Yemen.

      Or arguably Iraq and Afghanistan (Congress told Bush he could do it, at least, though they wouldn't come through with a Declaration of War, so it's only "arguable").

      Or Panama, Grenada, Vietnam, Korea (again, arguable, same reasons), Nicaragua (several times), many others through history.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    33. Re:Now these guys have some balls by downhole · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That could be considered an act of war. But then again, some might also consider a terrorist mass-murderer, engineer of an attack killing over 3,000 civilians and some unknown number of other attacks, living in a supposedly allied country, apparently with their implicit permission, to be an act of war as well. While we're at it, allowing "protesters" to attack an embassy in your country and hold everyone inside hostage for years is also generally considered to be an act of war. So is sponsoring attacks against the armed forces of another country.

      Basically, there's plenty of acts of war to go around in this area.

      --
      I don't reply to ACs
    34. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      didn't look very crashed to me.

      --
      Deleted
    35. Re:Now these guys have some balls by mikael · · Score: 2

      I was amazed to see the resolutions that HD USB webcams go up to these days (1920x1080 upwards) along with auto-focus, digital zoom, pan and tilt. A high-resolution CCD combined with motorized focus and fisheye lens means that the camera can "look round" without having any other motors apart from the focus. If that can be done for a two-figure sum, Military drone just needs to add satellite-communications, some basic avionics and some IR optics.

      Plenty of home videos of people who have stuck wireless webcams into those $25 indoor RC helicopters.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    36. Re:Now these guys have some balls by euroq · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A president like that would have caused the deaths of dozens, hundreds, or maybe tens of thousands of people depending on how much such an ensuing conflict would escalate to. Thank God we're not all dicks like you who think that it's worth killing people you don't know and spending collective money that you don't have because someone hurt your imaginary feelings.

      --
      Just because the U.S. is a republic does not mean it is not a democracy. Democracy/republic are not mutually exclusive.
    37. Re:Now these guys have some balls by dpilot · · Score: 2

      Stop that. Only the US can be EVIL around this planet. It's black and white, and if the US is black, then everyone else MUST be lily white.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    38. Re:Now these guys have some balls by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

      Exactly.

      IF its that secret. But there are indications its not all that secret or sensitive (despite public statements to the contrary).

      There is considerable speculation on the web that there is not that much secret stuff in this aircraft anyway, because it was fully expected they would have operational losses. See Here:

      The design lacks several elements common to stealth engineering, namely notched landing gear doors and sharp leading edges. It has a curved wing planform, and the exhaust is not shielded by the wing.[10] Aviation Week postulates that these elements suggest the designers have avoided 'highly sensitive technologies' due to the near certainty of eventual operational loss inherent with a single engine design and a desire to avoid the risk of compromising leading edge technology.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    39. Re:Now these guys have some balls by darjen · · Score: 2

      If the United States military invades, occupies, or bombs your country for decades, I can see why people in Arab lands might get angry and would want to eventually fight back at some point. If you are defending yourself against attacks to your home, that is generally considered to be Good by most reasonable standards. The United States is by FAR the most aggressive military nation in the world.

    40. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Talderas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As the other poster noted, when you have a downlink that's shooting out live video feeds, the people on the ground need to have access to that data in near real time and you're not going to run every soldier that -might- be using the link through a SECRET/TOP SECRET security clearance check before allowing them to have access to it. Then you have to redistribute the keys to all those soldiers whenever they get swapped out. It's a logistical nightmare that doesn't net you much of a benefit in light of the below...

      What the US is observing in real time is of limited usage. Without knowing the location of the observer, a top down view of a place can be very difficult to make useful, especially depending on how close the view is. Without readily discernible landmarks identifying buildings from other buildings it can be extremely difficult to discern where you're looking. As an example, get someone to pick a point in the city you live on the closest zoom level on Google Maps. Don't use any street names. Now try to ID where you're looking at. Further, just seeing what is being observed isn't 100% indicative of the intentions of the observer's actions and knowing that they view the streams has potential applications in the realms of disinformation. For instance, if we knew some insurgents were monitoring the downlink and were holed up in a building we could station a net around the build then use the drone to watch the building and wait for them to flee into more open terrain and be caught by the net.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    41. Re:Now these guys have some balls by SuperBigGulp · · Score: 2

      People get to talk tough now, including Cheney's latest comments, but when a similar incident happened early in the Bush/Cheney administration, we did nothing of the sort. A Navy EP-3E made an emergency landing on Hainan island, and the crew was detained for approximately 10 days. During that time the Chinese had sole access to the plane and the avionics.

      The US issued a Letter of Two Sorries, in which the US government stated "We are very sorry the entering of China's airspace and the landing did not have verbal clearance..."

      Diplomatically, probably the right way to resolve the crisis, but lets not act like all other presidents would have sent in Seal Team Six.

      --
      Someday a Slashdot ID of 177180 will mean something.
    42. Re:Now these guys have some balls by scubamage · · Score: 2

      Um, no. Congress has to declare war. Article 1, section 8 of the constitution, listing the powers of congress. "To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;" Source

    43. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Talderas · · Score: 2

      Yes, and no. The mail oil port on the side of Saudi Arabia is within range of coastal missile batteries fired from Iran. Hormuz is just the easiest point to secure. Iran can move batteries around and still threaten a huge swath of water. It's enough to serve as a hesitation for any ships trying to use that waterway. The US Navy cannot have ships deployed all across it to ensure that no trade vessels are susceptible to Iranian attack. Further, retaliatory strikes from the US against such shore batteries might prompt Iran to conduct an invasion of Iraq necessitating that the US Navy and Air Force adopt a defensive stance.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    44. Re:Now these guys have some balls by cusco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But then again, some might also consider a terrorist mass-murderer, engineer of an attack killing over 3,000 civilians and some unknown number of other attacks, living in a supposedly allied country, apparently with their implicit permission, to be an act of war as well.

      That may be, but I don't think that the US is going to allow the Bushes, Clinton, Kissinger, Rumsfeld, etc. to be extradited. The Pakistanis, Iraqis, Indonesians, Cubans, Nicaraguans, etc. are just out of luck. Only the US and Israel are allowed to pursue revenge killings.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    45. Re:Now these guys have some balls by cusco · · Score: 2

      One would think, but apparently the don't always work right. Two of the missiles that Clinton launched at Binladden crashed in Pakistan, and only one self-destructed. The other one supplies the basis of the Pakistani cruise missile program, and (IIRC) was eventually sold to China.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    46. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Moheeheeko · · Score: 2

      Other than the fact that Everyone is forgetting that the drone was last operational on the Afgan/Pakistan border.

    47. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Kagura · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those British sailors that Iran captured were definitely not in Iranian waters. Iran has pulled that stunt several years earlier too, with British sailors again. But this drone was in Iran, performing surveillance on Iranian targets, and then crashed due to a mechanical malfunction of some kind. Iran didn't shoot it down or commandeer it and try to land it, and it didn't accidentally fly over into Iranian territory from Afghanistan.

    48. Re:Now these guys have some balls by ukemike · · Score: 2

      it would be like flying a remote controlled helicopter around your yard that crashed into your neighbor's yard.

      Except that the air over your neighbor's yard isn't the airspace of a sovereign nation.

      --
      -- QED
    49. Re:Now these guys have some balls by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Also would be interesting to see what China is bidding.

      China and Iran are hardly on friendly terms, particularly militarily - what with Iran channeling funds into Western China political disruption. Nope. They may be happy to sell them oil, but if they have a military secret China doesn't possess, they're going to keep it.

      Not like China couldn't make their own, anyway. Probably already have and are using them over Tibet and Xinjiang to keep tabs on people.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    50. Re:Now these guys have some balls by a_hanso · · Score: 2

      Grand Theft Aero?

    51. Re:Now these guys have some balls by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

      Don't ignore the fact that they can close the Straight [sic] of Hormuz which would choke off the oil supply coming out of THE LARGEST oil supplier.

      Am I sensing FEAR from the Americans?

      America, allow me to ask you a question:

      What is the use of having and continue to pay to maintain the most powerful navy on earth when Iran can choke the Strait of Hormuz whenever she wants?

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  2. Yeah, and I want to clone Brittany Murphy by elrous0 · · Score: 3

    But let's face it, it just ain't happening.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Yeah, and I want to clone Brittany Murphy by ClioCJS · · Score: 2

      it's hard to clone corpses

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    2. Re:Yeah, and I want to clone Brittany Murphy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need a clone, you need a ghola.

  3. Iran? Nope, China and Russia... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Iran simply does not have the ability - the technical knowledge and manufacturing ability - to "clone" these aircraft.

    More likely is that China and / or Russia have already sent a team to take it apart and learn its secrets.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Iran? Nope, China and Russia... by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Assuming it even has any real "secrets". According to Wikipedia's article on the RQ-170:

      Aviation Week postulates that these elements suggest the designers have avoided 'highly sensitive technologies' due to the near certainty of eventual operational loss inherent with a single engine design and a desire to avoid the risk of compromising leading edge technology.

      (quote was from well before this loss, BTW). Most of the tech Iran doesn't have is likely to be in the electronics, and those are not easy to reverse engineer (things like the AESA radar system). China and Russia already have most of those. They might wanna take a look just for any new ideas or design differences, but it's not like these things are F-22s or anything.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    2. Re:Iran? Nope, China and Russia... by PPH · · Score: 2

      In many cases, classified technology isn't so much a matter of technological superiority as figuring out what the parameters of the problem are. Sometimes building countermeasures is just a matter of discovering what frequencies to block. Once that's known, blocking them is simple.

      Its not likely that Iran will be able to build drones for use against us by examining this one. After all, how do they know whether or not our radar can see our own drones. They'd have to capture an example of our radar and examine it to figure that out. What they do have is a test article for use in reconfiguring their antiaircraft systems to better see the next drone coming in. Its just a matter of measuring its RCS in different attitudes and RF absorption at different wavelengths. Simple enough to do in your average university EE lab.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Iran? Nope, China and Russia... by Clsid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your post denotes a big ignorance about Iran's manufacturing base. Those guys make their own cars, reverse engineered the F-14 and the Cobra during a war with Iraq and I have seen their technology up-close. They might not be a powerhouse but they are not some crappy middle east country either. Their drone production is actually better than China and Russia. Look up for the Ababil, Mohajer and others so you get a picture of how old their programs are and how advanced they are compared to China and Russia.

    4. Re:Iran? Nope, China and Russia... by phantomcircuit · · Score: 2

      You're talking about a country that has to import refined oil because they lack the technical ability to refine crude oil.

      There is no way in hell they're going to clone a stealth drone.

    5. Re:Iran? Nope, China and Russia... by bieber · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm a computer programmer, and yet I have to buy my furniture from a store. But wait, how is it possible that I could have the technological capacity to produce software when I have to rely on others for something as rudimentary as furniture? It's almost as if some skills and technical abilities were completely independent of others, and you could be very good at one while remaining completely ignorant of others...

    6. Re:Iran? Nope, China and Russia... by the+linux+geek · · Score: 2

      In other words, technology the US had in 1960 and 1945, respectively. So impressive!

      Let me know when they reverse-engineer the F-14. They've had 30 years to work on it.

    7. Re:Iran? Nope, China and Russia... by the+linux+geek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm an American, and I know that Iran only recently was able to reverse-engineer the F-5 (early 60's tech) and still hasn't been able to do the same for the F-14 (mid 70's tech.) If they can't reverse-engineer a fighter that they've had for thirty years, and is based on decades-old US technology, what makes you think they can reverse-engineer current US tech in a reasonable amount of time?

      There's quite a distance between "they're all primitive camel-riders" and "they're a technological power to rival the United States."

  4. Clone on the Range by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, give me a drone where the camels all roam
    Where the Sikhs and the Sunnis all pray
    Where often is heard a discouraging word
    And the skies are dusty all day

    Clone, clone of my drone
    Where the Sikhs and the Sunnis all pray
    Where often is heard a discouraging word
    And the skies are dusty all day

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  5. Joke's on you Iran! by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It doesn't have any DNA!

  6. Jesus by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Iran has also demanded an apology from the U.S. for the drone flight in its airspace.

    As they should. If I found some stealthy character in my backyard looking in on my wife, an apology is the LEAST I would demand.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  7. Good luck with that by BitZtream · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure their clone will be almost as good as mine, but probably not actually as good.

    The important technology in the device is embedded in chips that are the most tamper resistant devices on the planet, they'll be utterly destroyed and unusable for reverse engineering well before they get anywhere near the tech.

    The optics I'm sure are impressive, but not so much that they'll get some giant leap.

    The encryption keys were worthless before the aircraft hit the ground.

    The paint and fuselage material are the most important things on it that they can gather data from that isn't already something they can get their hands on through other channels.

    Its just silly for anyone to think they have a snowballs chance in hell of doing anything it it. It would be hard for US to reverse engineer it, let alone Iran.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Good luck with that by atrain728 · · Score: 2

      The US is probably most interested in knowing what went wrong with it.

  8. Re:When will Iran apologize to humanity? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

    When will Iran apologize to humanity? You know, for things like sentencing Salman Rushdie to death?

    I used to suffer from insomnia. But Salman Rushdie has helped me achieve a better sleep. Every time I pick up one of his books, I find myself dozing off rapidly...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  9. Re:When will Iran apologize to humanity? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Probably the same day the U.S. apologizes for the coup that overthrew democracy in Iran and put the Shah in power in 1953.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  10. Step 2.... Step 3 profit by mwfischer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Obviously the next course of action is to air strike the shit out of it so the technology doesn't go into enemy hands.

    Hey they asked nice, first.

  11. What nonsense by mr.mctibbs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How absolutely ridiculous of them to ask us to apologize for committing an act of war. Hasn't anybody been paying attention? The US, and only the US, has the right to invade other countries' airspace, kidnap, torture, and murder their citizens, and then accuse those countries of breaking the law. That's how democracy works. Those silly backward Iranians just don't get it. It must be Islam's fault.

  12. All Ur Drones R Belong 2 Us by macraig · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ummm... if they clone an American drone, won't it still answer to our siren call? Cool, that would make Iran a subcontractor for the U.S. military!

    1. Re:All Ur Drones R Belong 2 Us by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet they could make them cheaper than Lockheed Martin. Might work out for us in the end.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  13. old fortune says by drodal · · Score: 4, Funny

    O give me a clone, of the downed US drone, with the Y chromosome changed to X.......

    (it was funny in the 80's)

  14. why no self-destruct? by Chirs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It boggles my mind that this thing didn't self-destruct for exactly this reason.

    1. Re:why no self-destruct? by cblack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These drones do have a self-destruct as well as other "things are going wrong" modes. One of them is to just circle waiting for control communications to be re-established. Another one is an automatic safe landing mode. Some people suspect that this drone may have gone into auto landing mode which would explain why it appears undamaged. For such a sensitive device leading to such horrible PR if captured, I feel perhaps the self-destruct should be the default failure mode :)
      However, having it just blow up in some civilian household would probably not be good PR either.

    2. Re:why no self-destruct? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It doesn't have to self-destruct at an explosive level, just fry all the electronics and you're good.

      And we don't know if this didn't happen. 'Course, as usual, we don't know much at all about what really happened.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:why no self-destruct? by Talderas · · Score: 2

      Auto-landing is a high suspicion. That mode would probably circle lazily to the ground and the damage to drone is at the edge of one of the wings which would be consistent with such a landing if that wing was the inner facing wing. Additionally, none of the images show the underside which would give a pretty large indication of the mode of landing. There's also some damage that suggests the wings were separated but that could have been done by Iran after getting to it in order to move it.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    4. Re:why no self-destruct? by FellowConspirator · · Score: 2

      Doubtful. The paint is only part of the puzzle and a piece that they already have. The most valuable part is probably in the firmware. If they can unencrypt it, they can understand how to better jam it's command functions and also what electronic countermeasures it has.

    5. Re:why no self-destruct? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Everybody knows how radar absorbent paint works. It's the same as the coatings on lenses (destructive interference, 50% reflective, paint is 50% of wavelength in thickness).

      The tricky part is applying the paint in exactly the correct thickness.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:why no self-destruct? by Me!+Me!+42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I heard it reported that the software was the most sensitive part of the drone and that it was remotely destroyed on landing. Surprises me, as I would imagine the hardware was a pretty big deal too. In any case the US doesn't seem to concerned.

      --
      -- My apologies if the above facts contain any opinions, or vice versa! --
    7. Re:why no self-destruct? by hawguy · · Score: 2

      In this day and age of readily available encryption, you don't even need that.

      Hell, even the video game industry has been doing it since the 1990s - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP_System_II

      I don't think you read the entire article:

      In January 2007, the encryption method was fully reverse-engineered by Andreas Naive[3] and Nicola Salmoria. It has been determined that the encryption employs two four-round Feistel ciphers with a 64-bit key.[4][5] The algorithm was thereafter implemented in this state for all known CPS-2 games in MAME.

      Encryption can be broken, especially when you have physical access to the device that needs to do the decryption. There are all sorts of controls and booby-traps you can implement to restrict physical access, but a knowledgable and well funded lab can get around the controls.

      Adequate physical destruction cannot be reverse engineered - once you destroy a chip with a high energy, high temperature explosion, not even all of the kings horses and all of the kings men will be able to put it back together again.

    8. Re:why no self-destruct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they circumvent the encryption, the US can nail them under the DMCA. And if they clone it, boy are they in for a heap of trouble with IP and patent violations. No, I don't even see how they could possibly even consider doing any of that.

    9. Re:why no self-destruct? by ThinkWeak · · Score: 2

      These drones do have a self-destruct as well as other "things are going wrong" modes. One of them is to just circle waiting for control communications to be re-established. Another one is an automatic safe landing mode. Some people suspect that this drone may have gone into auto landing mode which would explain why it appears undamaged. For such a sensitive device leading to such horrible PR if captured, I feel perhaps the self-destruct should be the default failure mode :).

      Maybe it isn't supposed to detonate yet...

      I don't know about the rest of you, but I would feel VERY sketchy about standing, touching, being anywhere in the vicinity of a weapon from another super power that was "captured."

    10. Re:why no self-destruct? by swb · · Score: 2

      Yes, because they can scrape off a chunk, take it over to Mohammed's House of Paints and ask for a gallon with extra attention paid to color matching.

  15. Cloning by SaroDarksbane · · Score: 2

    China will clone it for Iran and start selling copies for one tenth of the price we spend on them in the states. DEY TUK R JERBS!

    1. Re:Cloning by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 2

      China will clone it for Iran and start selling copies for one tenth of the price we spend on them in the states. DEY TUK R JERBS!

      Somehow, I think cloning a U.S. drone is kind of like cloning a cell phone. It's not going to be good for much without the supporting network. My understanding is that the drones are controlled via satellite, so they'd need a few of those, a control room, and God knows how much supporting computer equipment and software. The Iranians would have to defend the ground-based control infrastructure, and I'd just about put money on Israel taking it out as soon as it became operational.

      The bigger problem is that the Iranians could possibly learn enough about how the drones are controlled to at least render them ineffective, or, as many have observed, they could barter the right to examine the thing to more capable nations.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  16. Well, it's possible... by medcalf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's possible that we deliberately downed a drone over Iran with a modern appearance but made with the wrong materials, and with old sensors and electronics generally — or maybe with electronics deeply flawed in a subtle way — with the intent of having Russia and China get their hands on it and then underestimate our capabilities. It's possible, that is, that this is actually an intelligence coup of the highest order.

    Knowing our government from inside experience, though, I'm voting for the assclown theory as the survivor of Occam's razor.

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    1. Re:Well, it's possible... by MagicM · · Score: 2

      It's possible that we deliberately downed a drone over Iran with a modern appearance but made with the wrong materials

      From now on every U.S. drone should carry a copy of the Anarchist Cookbook so that anyone who finds it will most likely blow themselves up.

    2. Re:Well, it's possible... by oldspicepuresport · · Score: 2

      It seems quite possible that this wasn't an accident. From an article I read recently:

      "The RQ-170 design lacks several elements common to stealth engineering, namely notched landing-gear doors and sharp leading edges. It has a curved wing, and the exhaust is not shielded by the wing. It has been postulated that these missing elements suggest the designers have avoided highly sensitive technologies due to the near certainty of eventual operational loss inherent with a single-engine design and a desire to avoid the risk of compromising leading-edge technology."

      Additionally, the drone is relatively intact, which would indicate a somewhat controlled landing (and unlike an airliner, a flying wing will drop out of the sky without it's fly-by-wire system making continuous adjustments). Even if this drone lost contact with its operators and went into an autonomous flight mode, surely the thing would be programmed to return to friendly airspace (I would assume anyways?)

      ...or it's possible that this was simply an accident, a technical glitch in the system... but that's not as fun as a conspiracy theory now is it?

  17. On the fence ? by aepervius · · Score: 2

    No it is more like having a camera suspended OVER your neighbor house, then the enighbors downit with a stone throw, and then asking it back, while playing innocent and offering a lot of denial of anything wrong.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  18. ...But he said Please! by sanzibar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i keep hoping this is some elaborate super secret spy ruse but the more I watch the incompetence the more I realize its just incompetence.

    1. Re:...But he said Please! by sosume · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's EXACTLY what I was thinking. Like a Trojan horse, the Iranians are parading the thing around all their secret facilities.

    2. Re:...But he said Please! by cblack · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...and when it detects Ahmadinejad's voice print nearby it goes kaboom!

    3. Re:...But he said Please! by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean the spy drone is a spy?

      We need to go deeper.

    4. Re:...But he said Please! by hawguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What I find the most hilarious, is that their secret facility appears to be a basketball court/high school gym (see the markings on the floor):

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16098250

      Or maybe they decided to house it in a school gymnasium so if the USA does decide to launch an attach against it, Iran gets to parade around video of the USA destroying a school.

  19. Re:You're Troll-a-riffic! by Jeng · · Score: 2

    Considering that the crown of their air force is a copy of a plane the US developed in 1961 I doubt that they can clone the most advanced drone we have.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  20. They already knew by Squiddie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone knows that Iran will not return the drone, and they're in that right. The US politicians will just use this as an excuse to escalate things and drive us closer to another unwanted war.

    1. Re:They already knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds to me like Tehran is escalating. Their rhetoric is typically warlike, but increasing in tone. Fortunately, their military has zero experience fighting a modern well trained and equipment armed force, and our military has 10 years of advanced experience in the harshest environments possible. Iran has zero chance of winning any type of military conflict and very little support even among middle eastern countries. So in effect we have them boxed in, they can't win an open war, all they can do is fund shadow terrorists and try to build a nuclear weapon. Which when used will result in the complete destruction of the Iranian state. But yeah, go ahead and blame the US if you want. The tyrannical muslim state is obviously the injured party here.

    2. Re:They already knew by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually under international law they are supposed to return any wreckage from an aircraft that crashes in their territory. That is during peace time. Also as long as the aircraft was not "military" and not armed it is not considered an act of war.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:They already knew by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      "So basically, according to you, the US should return the wrecks of the 9/11 planes? Do you realize now how stupid that makes you sound?"
      The 9/11 planes belonged to US companies and where US registered planes... They never left the US...
      As to how stupid my comment is.... Well a mirror may be in order.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  21. Tough call by Aphoxema · · Score: 4, Funny

    IANAL, but according to the precedent set by Keepers Vs. Weepers, I think the US will have a very hard time convincing the courts for the immediate return of their supposed property unless they can get their mommy and daddy involved.

    Oh, this was in Iran? Well, we know where this is going. The US will just go over to Iran's house and shoot his parents in the face.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  22. Re:I kind of hope.. by couchslug · · Score: 2

    "If not, whomever made the call to not have a reliable self-destruct sequence should be sacked."

    They would be, but they also drafted the Sacking Protocol.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  23. Re:When will Iran apologize to humanity? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know, for things like sentencing Salman Rushdie to death?

    Or like stealing the last election to prop up the Revolutionary Guard's puppet and when the people don't like it, beating the hell out of them, killing them and/or imprisoning them, even going so far as to not return bodies of the dead to their families but burying them in graves in restricted areas, where families can't visit. Cuz, you know, they RG runs Iran, not the Mullahs or Ayathollah, which are allowed to go about their business, pretending there's some actual republic when it's really all a sham and military coup by feat.

    What I'd like to know is why these drones don't even have a Self Destruct on a dead-man switch, out of contact for so long and sensitive bits are fused by a burning strip of Sodium or such.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  24. Clone by airfoobar · · Score: 2

    They can try to clone it, but maaan, imagine the IP that must be crammed into that thing!

  25. Run Away! by MarkGriz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Biden: Well, now, uh, Obama, Panetta, and I, wait until nightfall, and then leap out of the drone, taking the Iranians by surprise

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  26. Re:You're Troll-a-riffic! by arkane1234 · · Score: 2

    No, china produces them, not creating them.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  27. Re:When will Iran apologize to humanity? by HeckRuler · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh, then by all means, go edit history. The edit button is right at the top. Good luck.

    But the reason that we can trust the CIA in this matter is because it's declassified internal document logging the blackops that the CIA performed. This is their dirty laundry that they wouldn't want anyone to see.

  28. Re:I'm curious... by mvdwege · · Score: 3, Insightful

    even have an aerodynamics research lab? How about something besides an oil rig and a desert?

    Surely I don't have to be a fan of Iran to point out the idiocy of this statement? Iran is technologically one of the most advanced states in the region, probably only second to Israel.

    Oh they're a Gulf state; they must be camel-riding barbarians who only know how to sell oil. I'm going to say it right out: this is not mere ignorance, it's outright bigotry.

    Mart

    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  29. Plans to Clone - don't make me laugh so hard! by default+luser · · Score: 2

    The government announced that it planned to clone and mass produce the bat-winged craft for use against its enemies.

    Good luck with that. Unless you have some magical way to reverse-engineer likely 100,000+ lines of compiled source code, you'll never have more than a remote-controlled airplane with a fancy skin.

    And I really expect that the software is encrypted (or possibly even destroyed). Also, with the expected levels of anti-temper built into the hardware (required by the US Government since the start of this decade), they'll have a helluva time speccing-out the hardware interfaces using test tools.

    Good luck writing your own software from scratch with no idea how the hardware works!

    Now, if they had performed a cyber-attack and stolen source code and hardware specs, THEN I would be concerned. The plane part is relatively easy to build.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  30. sent a formal diplomatic request by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

    Did they post it on their digital embassy's blog? :P

  31. Re:When will Iran apologize to humanity? by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    If you think that coup is utterly unrelated to the subsequent history of Iran and U.S./Iranian relations you're either a complete idiot or willfully deluded. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume the latter.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  32. Re:I'm curious... by Avarist · · Score: 2

    You're obviously confusing Iran with the rest of the middle east. I don't know if it's sad or hilarious how ignorant you are. You might want to read this wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_technology_in_Iran They not only invented Windmills, Algebra, Alcohol and many more, they are also very prominent today in modern science and are currently having a huge boom in Scientific research. When you never get much more than a score of "1" here on /. on all of your comments, do you not realize this might not be the place you belong? At least try not to bring any 'input' in the future please, you have nothing of interest to bring to the table.

    --
    In Capitalist US, the commerce controls the Government.
  33. Stuxnet by Latent+Heat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How do you know the people in Iran aren't "supposed" to download the software, and in so doing propagate another worm?

  34. Link to the referenced story by sourcerror · · Score: 5, Interesting
  35. What? by Sol+Rosinberg · · Score: 2

    There's no satellite-controlled self-destruct mechanism? (Return it or we push the button!)