Slashdot Mirror


Google Engineer Builds Ultimate LAN Party House

Zothecula writes "Anyone who has a attended a LAN party — where people connect their computers on one network in one location to play multiplayer games together — can tell you that they can be both very fun but also kind of a hassle. Playing games with your friends all in the same room: fun. Having to organize all your friends to each haul their usually-oversized gaming rigs to one person's house, ensuring they all have the same software, and inevitably dealing with one or more people having trouble connecting: not fun. With that in mind, it makes sense that one Google employee decided to bypass all that inconvenience and just build a house specifically for LAN parties, complete with multiple networked computers and TVs connected to game consoles."

175 comments

  1. Party? by Toe,+The · · Score: 5, Funny

    I went to this LAN Party and everyone was wearing togas and drinking alcoholic beverages and making out and... and I didn't even see any computers anywhere. It was very strange.

    1. Re:Party? by TWX · · Score: 2

      Sounds like networking of a different sort...

      Was there a sign up that said, "Marketing Department: two drink minimum"?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I went to college the CS students were actually known for throwing the wildest parties, not quite sure how that happened initially but I suspect it just became a matter of pride for new CS students to uphold the "tradition" of hosting the craziest parties...

    3. Re:Party? by SomePgmr · · Score: 5, Funny

      "What? You think just cause a guy reads comics he can't start some shit?!" - Brodie

    4. Re:Party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Love a good Mall Rats reference.

    5. Re:Party? by kmankmankman2001 · · Score: 2

      I went to this LAN Party and everyone was wearing togas and drinking alcoholic beverages and making out and... and I didn't even see any computers anywhere. It was very strange.

      You mean there were females there? Then it definitely wasn't a LAN party.

      --
      "The bigger the lie, the more they believe." - Det. Bunk
    6. Re:Party? by Fallingcow · · Score: 2

      I went to this LAN Party and everyone was wearing togas and drinking alcoholic beverages and making out and... and I didn't even see any computers anywhere. It was very strange.

      "Toga shmoga. Look at the score for Christ's sake. It's only the second period and I'm up 12 to 2. Toga parties come and go, Rene, but Hartford, the Whale, they only beat Vancouver once, maybe twice in a lifetime."

    7. Re:Party? by Taty'sEyes · · Score: 5, Funny

      He didn't mention females in his description... you're making an assumption.

      --
      We show geeks how to get their dream girl at EyesOfOdessa.com
    8. Re:Party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In related news, one particular Google engineer will never, ever get laid nor even kiss a girl. Story at eleven.

    9. Re:Party? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      That was because it was a WAN party, not a LAN....

    10. Re:Party? by Toe,+The · · Score: 1

      One???

    11. Re:Party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTOH, they have money and there are many shallow chicks.

    12. Re:Party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I went to this LAN Party and everyone was wearing togas and drinking alcoholic beverages and making out and... and I didn't even see any computers anywhere. It was very strange.

      lanimal house

    13. Re:Party? by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      "I want to do something crazy with laz0rz all the way down!"
      -"I have this crazy idea where all these 'social' people will actualy come and pay you for it, just to watch it and maybe even generate pr0n at the spot!"
      "... how?!"
      -"Well..."

      --
      Here be signatures
    14. Re:Party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most dedicated drinkers I know are all CS people. My shared ski house has two kegerators that can be controlled and monitored over the internet. They're hooked up to a tablet running a custom application that tracks individual beer consumption using facial recognition. We've even got a private Github project and most of us are committers.

      It's pretty cool to be able to check whether the kegs are full on the way up to the mountains and ensure that it's cooled to the correct temperature when we arrive. It also helps us figure out who needs to pitch in for the new kegs and who needs to be egged on to drink more when the party is in full swing. I challenge any frat boy to be that dedicated to drinking ;-)

    15. Re:Party? by Temporal · · Score: 1

      You mean there were females there? Then it definitely wasn't a LAN party.

      If you look at the pictures in the article, there's a girl sitting in the very front of the first one. I guess I should have had her face the camera while I took the picture to make it a little more obvious... :P

    16. Re:Party? by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      um 12 computers! wow I bet Googles CCIEs and network staff (and Vint Cerf) must be having a good laugh. Cisco expects a CCNA to be able to design a small 2/3 thousand host environment across say 2 or 3 sites.
      This is the semester 4 team project done in the Cisco CCNA academy course.

  2. Good ventaliation by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hope it has good ventilation and cooling. Nothing worse than a hot, smelly lan party.

    1. Re:Good ventaliation by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      Not having RTFA, I wonder if they prefer a certain paint or type of wall to improve wireless connectivity. There have been reports that newer paints tend to decrease Wifi quality.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    2. Re:Good ventaliation by Kagato · · Score: 1

      LAN Party? Looks more like a Sausage Party.

      Seriously, neat wall design, although it seems more like an office than a living space. Perhaps if the monitors where some sort of wall "art" when not in use for the parties.

    3. Re:Good ventaliation by skids · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wireless? Serious gamers don't want their frag count affected by the hot pocket they just put in the microwave. So no. Probably not a consideration.

    4. Re:Good ventaliation by Canazza · · Score: 1

      I have to say, normally /. doesn't elaborate on complex terms in the summary. So why this time have they decided to do it for "LAN Party"?

      I mean, if this is the start of a trend whereby terms people might not know are added into the summary, by all means continue. But still... why the hell did you think we wouldn't know what a LAN party is?

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    5. Re:Good ventaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would you bring wireless equipment to a LAN party? That's like bringing your own weird brand cola to the theater. Like Pepsi.

    6. Re:Good ventaliation by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, one of the articles yesterday compared black holes to Cookie Monsters (as I pointed out), so... I would just be glad they didn't say something like "A LAN party uses a series of tubes to hook the play-time boxes together."

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    7. Re:Good ventaliation by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Yes, we all know geeks have pretty bad hygiene .... put a few of them in a room, and you get gaseous clouds toxic enough to drive you out of your own home.

    8. Re:Good ventaliation by Hentes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you are a true gamer, your rig will provide enough ventilation.

    9. Re:Good ventaliation by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      When you 'build a house' for your lan party ... you think in advance and you WIRE the house.

      No one plays FPS games seriously over WiFi, latency is enough to matter especially with more than one person on the same AP. Someone takes a break, heats up some coffee and everyone lags out thanks to the Microwave.

      Wifi is for dicking around on the couch and use in homes that aren't wired as a cheaper alternative to wiring.

      I REALLY wish people would stop trying to do EVERYTHING over wireless methods, its a really stupid plan.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    10. Re:Good ventaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LAN parties are a subset of sausage parties.

    11. Re:Good ventaliation by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Does the status of a microwave actually *affect* wifi, or this nothing but an old wive's tale? I've done high-speed wireless gaming next to various microwaves, and the fact that they were off or on has never so much as made the ping waver. Microwaves are so well shielded (for obvious reasons) that I actually doubt that any modern microwave could interfere with wifi. Unless of course you are behind it (then it acts like a metal filing cabinet, but on/off makes no difference).

    12. Re:Good ventaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not ping, but I bet your packet loss spiked and your NIC switched down to a lower speed to compensate for the added noise. Microwaves *do* bleed out noise in the 2.4GHz range, how much can depend on the age and particular model.

    13. Re:Good ventaliation by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      He designs a whole damn house for lan parties with custom furniture to seat all of the gamers...

      ...and then uses a $20 cardboard-stuffed ikea coffee table?

      --
      Bottles.
    14. Re:Good ventaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At most LAN parties I've been to, the worst effect of firing up a microwave is tripping out the circuit breakers. A typical household distribution board really struggles when running at 90% of load with the horrible power factor abuse from a dozen or more PCs

    15. Re:Good ventaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the status of a microwave actually *affect* wifi, or this nothing but an old wive's tale?

      It actually does, but only on certain wifi channels (frequencies). You can see a huge difference on a wifi spectrum analyzer. I'm sure google image search can show you.

    16. Re:Good ventaliation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I personally wouldn't attend a LAN party which refused to provide me with a Gigibit switch. Those 10/100 folk are not folk an upstanding gentleman should be see with.

    17. Re:Good ventaliation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Does the status of a microwave actually *affect* wifi, or this nothing but an old wive's tale?

      Depends on how old your microwave is. They are generally sealed quite well. That grill on the front effectively blocks all 2.4GHz power. However if you get yourself an old microwave with a bent door, or that looks in equally poor condition, expect RF interference to leak out of it like a sieve.

      Staring into a microwave on the otherhand is an old wives tale. The most likely areas for RF to leak out are through the gaps in the door and not through the front grill.

    18. Re:Good ventaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does the status of a microwave actually *affect* wifi, or this nothing but an old wive's tale?

      Depends on how old your microwave is.

      Definitely not a wive's tale.

      I recently replaced an old microwave with a new high-end Panasonic and it creates nearly as much interference as the old one.

      Had to move my AP which was about 12 feet away (one story down) before. Now it's about 30 feet away. The microwave no longer completely kills the wifi but it does slow it down.

    19. Re:Good ventaliation by neonKow · · Score: 1

      Are you there to game or to leech bandwidth? And hopefully you mean a port; I doubt you need a whole switch to yourself.

    20. Re:Good ventaliation by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      For work we tested WiFi and Powerline networking reliability under a bunch of conditions, distances, floors, etc when deciding whether to go with WiFi or Powerline for a wireless video streaming extender.

      About 15-20 people brought home both and subjected them to some scripted tests while running microwaves, TVs, fluorescent floor lamps, electric ovens, blenders, and more (and for power, direct plugged through power strips, etc)

      Very little significantly affected the performance of the WiFi beyond the distance, number of walls/floors in between, and the number/proximity of other WiFi networks (if I remember, 2.4GHz phones had some minor effect, too).

      On the other hand, lamps, plasma TVs, microwaves, blenders, and many other devices plugged into A/C really messed up the powerline adaptors.

      The weirdest result was with microwaves, actually - while for some people it degraded powerline performance, for a few others it actually *improved* bandwidth by a significant (10%?) bit.

      In the end we went with WiFi - the results were just much more predictable and the sources of interference well understood...

    21. Re:Good ventaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the status of a microwave actually *affect* wifi, or this nothing but an old wive's tale?

      Yes, microwaves certainly do affect Wi-Fi. My microwave at home (an LG model) causes Wi-Fi and Bluetooth to stop working if said device (e.g. netbook, Bluetooth headset) is within about 1 metre while it's running.

      My microwave at work is even worse -- it's one of those ones with a dial out the front, and causes Wi-Fi to become notoriously unreliable throughout the entire office. Time to ditch it, methinks.

      In theory, the metal box should cause the microwave to act as a Faraday Cage. In practice, the radio waves still leak out and cause interference.

    22. Re:Good ventaliation by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      WLAN parties never caught on.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    23. Re:Good ventaliation by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      Yet with all of that, a Cat 5e cable still wins.

      I use wireless on the couch or easy chair. Other than that, if I'm going to be plugged in for power, why not networking too?

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
  3. Must be nice... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...to have this much cash. By my standards, a LAN party is fancy when nobody's sitting on the floor.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Must be nice... by TWX · · Score: 1

      I had an overly strong computer case so I could sit on that actually.

      I was the host more often than not though, so I had a chair.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Must be nice... by somersault · · Score: 2

      Yep. This is a really strange way to spend your money, even by geek standards. On top of the house costs he'd have to spend tens of thousands every year just to keep the hardware up to date. Ouch.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Must be nice... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Haha yep any early '90s steel case is probably strong enough...not like the new featherweight aluminum ones that would probably crumple like a soda can. But I am glad for the weight savings, the case alone on some of those old tanks was nearly 20lbs!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Must be nice... by fsckmnky · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't think of it as him spending his money.

      Think of it as him spending your personal information and search history. ;)

    5. Re:Must be nice... by somersault · · Score: 2

      Haha.

      After reading the article I see he lives in the house too, so it's not quite as bad as the house existing "specifically for LAN parties" as the summary said. I get very literal minded when I'm coding..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:Must be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, a whole 20 lbs. Oh, right - this is /. lol

    7. Re:Must be nice... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      LIAN LI Lancool PC-K7B. It's a hybrid case that's housed in aluminum with the internals being steel. Because the outside surface area is aluminum, it cools better exothermically than an all steel case would. I've built a few PCs with this case. I highly recommend it as it's the best of both worlds.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    8. Re:Must be nice... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      A 20lb. case with 45lb. of electronics inside is nothing to scoff at. It's much easier to carry when the case weighs practically nothing.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    9. Re:Must be nice... by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget electricity! Good for the winter where the bodies warm the place, real bad in the summer when the AC is running like a marathon.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    10. Re:Must be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're all facing away from each other. Proof positive that throwing cash at a problem doesn't guarantee a good solution. When I hosted LAN parties, we built a big round table, so that everybody could see everybody else.

    11. Re:Must be nice... by somersault · · Score: 2

      Games are not hardware, they're software. *pat pat*

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:Must be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd RTFComment you'd know that he's talking about HARDWARE, not software.

    13. Re:Must be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it interesting that all the posts about this guy mention he is a Google engineer. What does that have to do with anything?

    14. Re:Must be nice... by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Yeah...folding chairs are *so* expensive. As are tables.

      Really, if someone wanted to accomodate for a similar number of people it wouldn't require much more money than it would to host DnD - furniture-wise. As for the hardware - have people bring their own. If you want to be fancy about it - take some carpentry classes and see if you could learn how to build a lot of this yourself. I don't see much that was too flashy here that would be out of reach of anyone who didn't mind saving a bit for a year and wouldn't mind learning some new skills.

    15. Re:Must be nice... by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      It means he's loaded, so it's probably worth looking at. Nobody would care what my home network looks like. :)

    16. Re:Must be nice... by SnickleFritz · · Score: 1

      Yes, it must be nice.

      We'd have to clear out the biggest room in the house and setup make shift plywood tables to squeeze more people in. A lot of times the cases would be needed as legs for the table tops.

    17. Re:Must be nice... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      And, with all the savings in weight, you can afford to carry a folding chair too. :D

    18. Re:Must be nice... by Temporal · · Score: 1

      Well, it was expensive, but not very much more expensive than any other house. The cost of the computers was small compared to the cost of the house.

      Here's the back story, if you're interested.

    19. Re:Must be nice... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was thinking that if this were the "Ultimate LAN party", it would have more comfortable desks and chairs than those pictured.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    20. Re:Must be nice... by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Unless they were talking about board games maybe? (I dunno, haven't read TFA or TFS, but just a thought)

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    21. Re:Must be nice... by TWX · · Score: 1

      I did that at one point too... I had two full-tower cases with six 5.25" bays each. One had my computer in it and the other just had some junk in it. This was a long time ago, both were AT...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    22. Re:Must be nice... by definate · · Score: 1

      I bought an all aluminium case in the mid 90s, and I still use it today! A Lian Li server tower. It cost a lot. Was great for moving around for LAN parties, and is really strong. However, it's got a resonance problem. There seem to be many frequencies which it can start vibrating at, and then it's suddenly making all sorts of loud twanging sounds. It's unbearable to put the sides on any more.

      But modern ones have sound dampening foam, rubber on the seals, and all sorts of cool stuff like that.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    23. Re:Must be nice... by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      well I am sure he could afford the 10-15k a Sultan http://www.geekchichq.com/furniture/sultan/

  4. Having run a gaming room at a convention... by TWX · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...I can tell you that unless everyone present is already vetted, there will still be problems. People will reconfigure controls, will bring their own peripherals and will unhook yours, will move stuff around that they have no business moving, etc.

    There's a reason why arcade game consoles were the order of the day in old-school electronic arcades- there was one cord to plug them in, they were too heavy to move, and the controls were specialized to the game and fixed into place. They were a kiosk for playing games in the same way that an ATM is a kiosk for dealing with money and banks. They worked well because the user couldn't do much to screw them up.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Having run a gaming room at a convention... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Aside from competing for the high score so they could enter BUM.

    2. Re:Having run a gaming room at a convention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      My initials *are* BUM, you insensitive clod. :)

    3. Re:Having run a gaming room at a convention... by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Or FUK.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    4. Re:Having run a gaming room at a convention... by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      The complete opposite of minecraft? Which seems to dominate lan parties nowadays...

    5. Re:Having run a gaming room at a convention... by dead_user · · Score: 1

      I always tended towards FUQ. Two syllables.

    6. Re:Having run a gaming room at a convention... by metalgamer84 · · Score: 1

      or POO or ASS or...

    7. Re:Having run a gaming room at a convention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This really shouldn't be a problem for this setup. It's not like he can't setup PING as a NetBoot option to restore the machine to a known good image in about 25 minutes.

      Just plug your stuff back in and image when they leave.

    8. Re:Having run a gaming room at a convention... by AncientPC · · Score: 1

      It's not in the OP, but the engineer provides more information in his blog post.

      Instead, the machines boot off the network. A server machine hosts a master disk which is shared by all the game machines. Machines can boot up in two modes:

      Master mode: The machine reads from and writes to the master image directly.
      Replica mode: The machine uses its local storage (60GB SSD) as a copy-on-write overlay. So, initially, the machine sees the disk

      image as being exactly the same as the master, but when changes are written, they go to the local drive instead. Thus, twelve machines can operate simultaneously without interfering with each other. The local overlay can be wiped trivially at any time, returning the machine to the master image's state.
      So, before each LAN party, I boot one machine in master mode and update it. Then, I boot all the machines in replica mode, wiping their local COW overlays (because they are now out-of-sync with the master).

      Server room pics

    9. Re:Having run a gaming room at a convention... by Temporal · · Score: 1

      I really wish the Slashdot submitter had linked directly to the original blog post rather than the Gizmag article. It goes into a bit more detail on the configuration of the systems, which I think would interest Slashdotters in particular. (Though I still need to write a longer blog post about this.)

      All the system netboot off the same disk image. Or rather, LVM snapshots of that image. Each machine gets its own snapshot, so guests can modify it to their heart's content. At the end of the night, I just delete the snapshot and make a new one. When I need to update the machines, I boot one machine against the master image and update that, then remake all the snapshots.

      So, it doesn't matter what the guests do to the machines, because they aren't modifying the master image.

    10. Re:Having run a gaming room at a convention... by supertux · · Score: 1

      I've done a similar setup at my house for probably similar reasons - solves the problem of friends bringing over their nappy computers with ancient video cards and me having to upgrade that and get it all running every lan party.

      I used opensolaris (and now openindiana) for the back end server. It has lots of ram and some SSDs for the l2arc cache so most things end up being cached. I use zfs snapshots for the clone systems.

      This works well, and performance falls somewhere between an SSD and a Hard drive for gaming load times... with one exception.. boot times for the diskless systems is horrible. Like 2 minutes each.

      It looks like you are booting your windows off VHD and putting the differential on the local SSD? Any benefits of doing that over just running everything from the backend server?

      I'm thinking about getting an SSD for mine and using that for the boot partition of the systems, and then having steam on an iscsi mount off the backend server. That should give great performance, and fast boot times. But I wouldn't be able to rollback the OS to the master state like I can do now.

      Yeah, so what did you do software wise?

    11. Re:Having run a gaming room at a convention... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      All of these problems are solved by a disk imager. When the party's over, reset the computers to default.

  5. the days of lan play supporting games are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the past you had classics of LAN play, like NWN1.

    Now? Modern games remove the feature. Diablo 3 - yanked, so they can make you play through their servers. Same for many others. It's all about control. When games directly supported LAN play, it gave the players and the community control over their experience. It let them play without permission, and that is a thing that couldn't be allowed to stand.

    LAN play was some of the funnest gaming to be had. Far, far better than trying to share a single screen on a console. But it's dying. Killed because we must ask for permission to play the games we bought.

    1. Re:the days of lan play supporting games are over by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      Other modern LAN-tastic games with no actual LAN play: Starcraft 2, Serious Sam series, Left 4 Dead 2, Portal 2 (fun with custom levels), Brink. Good thing there are cracks and LAN launchers...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:the days of lan play supporting games are over by Hatta · · Score: 2

      There's nothing stopping you from firing up NWN or Diablo 2 on your home LAN today.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:the days of lan play supporting games are over by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Do not both of those need a handshake with a server before playing? I seem to recall having issues with NWN when trying to set up a lan game once because of that.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    4. Re:the days of lan play supporting games are over by Hentes · · Score: 1

      This is an inconvenience for sure, but LAN isn't going anywhere. First, there are cracks for most games that enable LAN play, and second you won't play these modern games on a party anyway because you have to play ones that even the weakest machine in the swarm can run smoothly.

    5. Re:the days of lan play supporting games are over by Temporal · · Score: 1

      Everyone brings this up and I don't quite understand. Who cares where the server is located? We all have internet connections, don't we? What matters is where the players are located.

      We've actually played quite a bit of Starcraft 2 in this house despite the supposed lack of LAN support.

    6. Re:the days of lan play supporting games are over by Apocryphos · · Score: 1

      diablo 2 is very lan-friendly
      also - play icewind dale 2 instead of NWN. (unless you are talking about NWN mods)

    7. Re:the days of lan play supporting games are over by dj245 · · Score: 1

      It is a problem of latency and bandwidth. I live in a major metropolitan area and the best latency to a game server I can hope to get is about 40ms, but more commonly 50ms. If you're running games on a server somewhere, it is going to take around 0.08 to 0.1 seconds for an action to go from your computer to the server, and from the server to your buddy's computer. Then your buddy reacts. and it takes another 0.08 to 0.1 seconds to come back to you. Suppose your buddy has a 1 second reaction time. The latency adds 15% to 20% more time on top of his reaction time. This is often noticeable.

      Compare to a home wired LAN. The latency will be 1ms, or 0.001 seconds. One of you is probably hosting the server, so the total time from action->reaction coming back to your computer is almost exactly the same as your buddy's reaction time. If your buddy can react in 1 second, you will never notice the 0.001s latency of the network.

      Now- the bandwidth. If you have 10 people over, every time someone does an action, it goes to the server. Then it comes back to from the server to ALL the computers. Most games don't support multicast, and your ISP doesn't anyway, so the traffic is multiplied by the number of players. 10 people are uploading their action data, and action data from the equivalent of 100 players is coming back. For every X players you have, you have datarate*X going out, and datarate*X^2 coming back. The data coming in rapidly increases as you add players, and will eventually overload even the largest pipes. I can get gigabit internet for maybe $600 a month (a rough guess, it is probably more expensive). I can buy a gigabit switch for 16 connections for about $100. It is much better handled on a local network.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    8. Re:the days of lan play supporting games are over by Temporal · · Score: 1

      Yes but the base bandwidth used by games is actually quite small. Let's say (overestimate) that you have 10 input events per second that need to be broadcast. That's going to take maybe 100 bytes, tops. All the other players are receiving events from 10 people, so 1k each. Times 10 players. 10k per second. My bandwidth is 400x that.

      Of course, that's not actually how most client-server games work. Rather, they send you updates just about the objects you can see. Which probably takes significantly more bandwidth than just broadcasting keypresses, but not 400x more bandwidth.

      We've had times when all 12 of us joined a public TF2 server, and it worked out just fine.

      50ms latency is within the range that games can hide using client-side prediction, though I think my connection usually gets better pings than that.

    9. Re:the days of lan play supporting games are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing better than a firewall rule to fix that.
      Just block nwmaster.bioware.com and you're set to play in LAN.
      Unless they changed it, or you can just unplug the modem a bit.

      cap: launch
      How fitting.

  6. Shared-screen multiplayer by tepples · · Score: 1
    From the summary:

    Playing games with your friends all in the same room: fun. Having to organize all your friends to each haul their usually-oversized gaming rigs to one person's house, ensuring they all have the same software, and inevitably dealing with one or more people having trouble connecting: not fun.

    Then why not just make PC games that support a shared-screen mode for a PC connected to an HDTV? Then all four players can grab gamepads, sit on a sofa, and have fun. The downsides are that 1. it wouldn't work well for certain genres, and 2. publishers would lose the opportunity to sell multiple copies to a household.

    1. Re:Shared-screen multiplayer by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Well, for one I'd rather have all my 3 686 000* pixels for my gaming session, my own comfy chair (instead of having to squeeze into a couch with half a dozen others), a little free space of my own, not have to fight over the least broken controller...

      * 27" IPS monitor @ 2560x1440 and for networked games I routinely play against 20+ other players, when playing even four players on a 1080p screen you're looking at a grand total of 518 400 pixels per player (not counting any shared HUD elements), or 960x540 (most likely on a 50" or smaller screen meaning you're hardly getting a large screen either, not to mention the possibility of other peeking).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    2. Re:Shared-screen multiplayer by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I doubt anyone cares about #1. I'm sure it's all about #2. Especially when you look at the popularity of multiplayer games vs. single player games, and where development is focused on. (Stinks for me, since I can eventually beat an AI, but there are always people that spend waaaaayyy more time on a multiplayer, so I can't even pretend to compete.)

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    3. Re:Shared-screen multiplayer by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Gaming is the best way I've found for me and my teenage son to enjoy time together, so I'm always on the lookout for good split-screen games. Sadly, they seem to be getting less common. Mostly we still play Halo 3 because two people can play online with 1 game and 1 xbox account.

    4. Re:Shared-screen multiplayer by vxir · · Score: 1

      Shared screen? Why not just run 12 VMs and have everybody share mouse and keyboard too. Form a line, everybody gets 1 min of play then hit ctrl-alt-esc and on to the next guy. Super fun times!

  7. Fun / Not fun by lsolano · · Score: 1

    "Playing games with your friends all in the same room: fun"

    What about having a girlfriend instead?

    1. Re:Fun / Not fun by Eldragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      The guy who built this house attended my LAN party last month. He brought his girlfriend. She is real, and plays games. Yes, you can have the best of both.

    2. Re:Fun / Not fun by lsolano · · Score: 1

      Good answer. I mean it!

    3. Re:Fun / Not fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, did you feel inadequate that someone with such a setup was at your LAN party?

    4. Re:Fun / Not fun by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      You of course neglect to inform everyone of the horrible devil's bargain he paid for such a setup:

      Girl, plays games, not fat.

      You only get two.

    5. Re:Fun / Not fun by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 1

      Actually my best friend's wife is a girl, plays games, and isn't fat. However there's a downside no one has mentioned... Picture if you will, a husband and his wife playing League of Legends...

      "come and help me get the blue buff"
      "why are you feeding the other team??"
      "for Christs sake! I just want to win a game! Why won't you ever just play normally instead of trying to jungle and getting killed all the time?!"...

      Consider the implications of having your girlfriend / fiance / wife partaking in your favourite past time. They will tell you that what you're doing is wrong, they will not be pleased at all if you throw a game on a badly judged gank (even if it would have gotten you that penta kill if only Nocturne hadn't been hiding in that bush). And they will blame you when your team loses AND never, ever let you live it down.

    6. Re:Fun / Not fun by metalgamer84 · · Score: 1

      Interesting, my wife is all three. Stereotypes aren't true for everyone, but darn if they aren't fun to bitch about on the Internet.

    7. Re:Fun / Not fun by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yeah my wife is not fa, but she doesn't play games (apart from Spider Solitaire). Guess you can't have everything, but she's cool with me playing as much as I want so I'll count my blessings.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    8. Re:Fun / Not fun by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      I think its rather nice to have my wife enjoy my past time with me. She plays video games, likes to go fishing and water skiing, oh, and she's rather attractive. You know what else? The same is true for 3 out of 4 of my geek friends I can think off of the top of my head. I can't imagine marring someone who I didn't get along with. Why would you intentionally make yourself miserably for the rest of your life? Just because you're trying to get laid so bad you ignore what actually matters for more than 2 minutes?

      If you have such a problem communicating and spending time with someone that you argue over everything I highly recommend you do not get married or have a serious relationship with that person.

      Intelligent people don't marry someone they fight and argue with all the time, doing so shows you to be rather ignorant and short sighted.

      You're wife/husband is supposed to be your best friend and team mate, it sounds to me like you seem to not have a real good grip on healthy relationships.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:Fun / Not fun by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, and reacting just as extremely, just what sort of relationship are you in where you never argue, and that the mere thought of arguing implies that the relationship is inherently broken? Never mind that the comment was made in jest, and that you seem compelled to defend your utopian model of a relationship. Let me guess, you wear the pants but she tells you which pair?

    10. Re:Fun / Not fun by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Being in a good relationship doesn't mean being 100% codependent and having identical interests. In fact I think it helps to have a few things you can claim as your own.

    11. Re:Fun / Not fun by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      What about having a girlfriend instead?

      What's wrong with boyfriends?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    12. Re:Fun / Not fun by Temporal · · Score: 1

      >> Playing games with your friends all in the same room: fun
      >
      > What about having a girlfriend instead?

      What about having a girlfriend who is also a gamer and plays games with you and your friends? :D

    13. Re:Fun / Not fun by gottspeed · · Score: 1

      Nothing, unless you're a man in which case nobody wants to hear about it, media validated or not.

    14. Re:Fun / Not fun by Temporal · · Score: 1

      Girl, plays video games, not fat, and looks totally bad-ass holding a bow and arrow (while I look kind of like a dork).

      Choose four.

  8. House?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's not a house, it's an Internet Cafe that does mind having customers sleep over. BFD.

  9. Bad layout. by BMOC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) People are facing a wall, not each other.
    2) There's no table central to all players, where pizza resides.
    3) A single-line of players means players on the ends have trouble communicating verbally.
    4) There's uneven lighting across the gaming spots, and it looks like more lighting behind the players than in front of them
    5) Those chairs are not comfortable enough.

    /you have to consider these things if you want to keep going all weekend

    --
    I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    1. Re:Bad layout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      /you have to consider these things if you want to keep going all weekend

      That's what your MOM said! ;)

    2. Re:Bad layout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree with all of the above. The layout is extremely stupid if you are going to invest that much money. Why not create a hexagonal station? You could even have a place in the middle of the hex station where everyone can grab snacks or pizza.

    3. Re:Bad layout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is exactly what I thought when I first saw it. It looks more like an internet cafe than a LAN party. In any case half the point of taking your own PC to a LAN party is that you are used to the controls and setup so I think even as an engineer, this guy has failed to think about the practicalities of his entire setup and just seems to have thrown money at it.

    4. Re:Bad layout. by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      1) Better if people on a single row are on the same etam, they can peek to their sides and see things that they're not really supposed to.
      2) Maybe perhaps behind them?
      3) Use in game communication or set up your own personal mumbles/vent server. Easier to use headphones for sound accuracy (positioning) and instead of having to scream over speakers to talk to someone across the room.
      4) who cares?
      5) who cares?

    5. Re:Bad layout. by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Now that I've read the article, it makes sense. The LAN stations are built into the walls and fold out only when necessary. That way you don't have empty kiosks hogging up the living room when you're alone at 10AM in the morning. Less efficient for actual LANning, but far more efficient for space constraints and clutter reduction.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    6. Re:Bad layout. by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

      3) A single-line of players means players on the ends have trouble communicating verbally.

      Dood, if they are gamers then this is a fact of their existence...
      besides, they're just going to be yelling "Take that, you fucker!" -

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    7. Re:Bad layout. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Dude has put one PC gamer sat by himself in front of the door. This is a classic example of how not to set up your games room.

      If I were putting money into a project like this, the PC desks would be in an incomplete ring with backs to a central munchies table. This keeps everyone close to each other and the snacks, and greasy crap away from your gear. Bin through hole in centre of central table to throw napkins and empty tins / cartons (wheel-out system for emptying optional). Have the TV and sofa in another room; It's for chilling out. Have a channel for watching the current game on the LAN if you wish, but offer media PC functionality too to watch a movie or episode of something easy to let you recuperate.

      IMHO ;)

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    8. Re:Bad layout. by Kagato · · Score: 1

      The bigger issue for me is, who still has LAN parties. We live in the internet age Yo!

    9. Re:Bad layout. by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I'd think it would be possible to create a series of desks that fold up like an accordion and easily slide into a closet like room. When it's LAN party time you grab some handles and pull it out (one end attached to a wall to provide network/power) to have a series of LAN Party pods. If you design it right, it could pull out in an arc to provide a set of desks in a half circle pod.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    10. Re:Bad layout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no table central to all players, where pizza resides.

      This 'aint no pizza hut, mother******!

      (Captcha: hateful ;))

    11. Re:Bad layout. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      You are free to fix all these mistakes when you build your own LAN house.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    12. Re:Bad layout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. You can't do LAN for the latest Starcraft and Diablo games. So it's kind of an antiquated gesture. He might as well have put in a fold-out canasta table.

    13. Re:Bad layout. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      People who like to socialize?

      The experience is entirely different when you hear the guy on the other side of the room scream as you blow his head off, and then go talk about it and compare notes or video reply and BS about what happened while you take a break, get a drink or grab some snacks between rounds.

      I'd much rather sit down in the same room or two near by rooms and play with my friends than play over the Internet.

      I play over the Internet because my brothers are spread out between Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado and North Carolina and I have friends in Georgia, Florida, Washington and California, but not as a replacement for a good old, everyone in the same home LAN party.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    14. Re:Bad layout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's absolutely nothing stopping you from having 8 people logged into battle.net from the same IP.
      Did that in our summer LAN party with Starcraft 2.

      Oh, not everyone owns the game? The free passes work great for LAN parties too.

    15. Re:Bad layout. by Temporal · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hi. This is my house.

      > 1) People are facing a wall, not each other.

      People are facing their computers when playing, and then they can turn around to chat when done. Having everyone at a table would actually make them more separated. And anyway, the whole point is that having fold-out stations in the wall means they don't take space when not in use.

      > 2) There's no table central to all players, where pizza resides.

      Didn't you just say that the computer table should be central? :P There's actually space right behind that line of chairs for a table if that's what we wanted, and in the other room you could put a table in the middle of the room. In practice we just put the pizza on the dining table (in the background there) and that works fine.

      > 3) A single-line of players means players on the ends have trouble communicating verbally.

      In practice everyone's voice carries fine across the room.

      > 4) There's uneven lighting across the gaming spots, and it looks like more lighting behind the players than in front of them

      I think the lighting in the house is fantastic. There is never a need to turn on artificial lights during the day.

      True, bright lights are not ideal for LAN parties, and at just the right time of day there may be some glare on one or two monitors, but it's brief, and once the sun goes down it's a non-issue.

      Remember that I live in this house even when there aren't LAN parties. :)

      > 5) Those chairs are not comfortable enough.

      Actually, I'm very happy with the chairs. They are padded and quite comfortable. And, most importantly, they stack, so I can store them out-of-the way between parties.

    16. Re:Bad layout. by gl4ss · · Score: 0

      no room to stretch your legs. how the fuck you're supposed to sit 12 hours on that? why is the monitors so far away from kb?
      anyhow, bigger problems would probably come from google shunning windows?

      anyhow, yeah well. uh, if you have the money why not.. but that thing looks like the machines are set up like you were just in a slightly better net cafe.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    17. Re:Bad layout. by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      It looks fine, stop being pedantic.
      Also, the only problem is there's TOO MUCH light. A proper LAN party it should be dark in there, sheets over the windows that kind of thing, so the mole men gamers can truly come out and play.
      (like me)

    18. Re:Bad layout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi. This is my house.

      Well i just want to say congratulations with getting an epic house. This is awesome and i envy you. I will be considering this next time i'm looking for a new place, that's for sure.

    19. Re:Bad layout. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be too worried about the stupid comment. If I knew you, and got an invite to come over and play, I'd be very grateful, and I expect most people would. It looks like a great compromise between living, and playing. Add pizza and it's almost heaven.

  10. Great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They should put these in cafes and spread them out all over the world.

  11. As someone that spends a lot of time in a cabin... by IANAAC · · Score: 0
    albeit with electricity, that's a hell of a lot of juice running through one house.

    Then again, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need a whole lot of power to do what I need to. My cabin is capable of running a couple major appliances, lights, TV, radio, vacuum cleaner, a couple laptops, but certainly not 12 X 500W (most likely) or more, just for computers, not to mention networking.

  12. Re:As someone that spends a lot of time in a cabin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your stove alone could use close to 6000 W when you've got it all running. It's not that huge a consumption. A dollar an hour.

  13. Re:As someone that spends a lot of time in a cabin by IANAAC · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Your stove alone could use close to 6000 W when you've got it all running. It's not that huge a consumption. A dollar an hour.

    No, not mine. Not anywhere near 6000W.

    But I've taken measure to reduce electricity consumption in the cabin, partly by buying lower wattage appliances. Solar panels are going into the mix next year.

  14. Shared does not always mean split by tepples · · Score: 1

    518 400 pixels per player [...] 960x540

    This assumes that the game is in a genre for which the screen would have to be split. One genre that does not require a split is fighting games, such as Street Fighter or Super Smash Bros. Similar to fighting games are things like Bomberman and Custom Robo (does this genre have a name?). Some other games have a vertically oriented playfield, using less than about 720x1080 even in single-player mode, and splitting the screen is not disruptive. These include building block puzzle games such as Tetris, as well as rhythm games such as Dance Dance Revolution and Rock Band.

  15. 1999 Called... by TheDawgLives · · Score: 4, Funny

    They want their Internet Cafe back.

    --
    -TheDawgLives suckitdown
  16. and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    my basement has been like this for years. so what?

  17. Bring your own controller by tepples · · Score: 1

    Well, for one I'd rather have all my 3 686 000* pixels for my gaming session

    And zero pixels for the gaming sessions of the one to three other people in your living room who can't afford a gaming PC of their own. Perhaps they're still in school, not yet old enough to get a real job, and a neighbor family's kid has already signed lawn care contracts with most of the neighborhood. But then again, perhaps my viewpoint is skewed because I spent a couple years babysitting my aunt's children.

    not have to fight over the least broken controller

    At least in my family, recommending that visitors bring their own controller has been considered a lot more reasonable than asking them to disassemble the family's only gaming PC, take it out of the house, and buy a copy of the same game that I'm hosting.

    1. Re:Bring your own controller by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      And zero pixels for the gaming sessions of the one to three other people in your living room who can't afford a gaming PC of their own. Perhaps they're still in school, not yet old enough to get a real job, and a neighbor family's kid has already signed lawn care contracts with most of the neighborhood. But then again, perhaps my viewpoint is skewed because I spent a couple years babysitting my aunt's children.

      So your argument is that those of us who can afford a computer should still use a console because all gaming should be restricted to the lowest common denominator?

      At least in my family, recommending that visitors bring their own controller has been considered a lot more reasonable than asking them to disassemble the family's only gaming PC, take it out of the house, and buy a copy of the same game that I'm hosting.

      Most people don't have controllers for every console out there, it's a lot more common for the host to have a bunch of controllers ranging from "Crappy worn-out one that came with the console" to "The brand new one he bought last week".

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    2. Re:Bring your own controller by tepples · · Score: 1

      So your argument is that those of us who can afford a computer should still use a console because all gaming should be restricted to the lowest common denominator?

      No, my argument is that those of us who can afford a computer, but live with or are commonly visited by those who cannot, should use a home theater PC with HTPC-friendly games such as Street Fighter IV.

      Most people don't have controllers for every console out there

      PC HID gamepads (e.g. Logitech) work natively on a PC, and Xbox 360 controllers work natively on a PC. The host could buy a couple console-to-USB adapters to connect e.g. PlayStation controllers to the PC; these won't have the problem of having to use a worn controller.

  18. LAN Parties... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't these kind of go the way of the dodo, when we all got smartphones and dataplans? ...eh, uh ...I mean laptops and wi-fi?

    GET OFF MY LAWN!

  19. When you've seen one privately owned cyber caf by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    you've seen 'em all.

    What, slow news day much?

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  20. Who hosts LAN parties anymore ? by billcopc · · Score: 0

    I haven't hosted nor attended a LAN party in, well heck I can't even remember... at least a decade. The last time I even played a PC game with another person on the same segment was when we 2-manned Diablo II, and that was at least 3-4 years ago. It's just way too much hassle anymore.

    Very occasionally we'll play a console game in split-screen, or for sports titles it's just one screen with different-colored markers for each player. 99% of the time though, we just play online with a mic headset or Ventrilo. The RL meetups are strictly for RL stuff, like food/drink, band jams, game day at the bar (an excuse to get away from our wives)... we just don't see the point in traveling to just play a quick video game when it's much more comfortable and convenient to do so online whenever the hell you're bored. At best, we'll make "play dates" to get a large-ish group going for certain games, like say Call of Duty or various racing titles that are best enjoyed while launching various hyper-offensive slurs at your drinkin' buddies. All that requires is an SMS or phone call, no tedious packing/driving/unpacking/wiring/breaker-flipping ritual.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Who hosts LAN parties anymore ? by Beelzebud · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Okay, this is going to come as a shock to you so sit down. Not everyone shares your opinions, and not everyone spends their money and free time exactly the way you would.

    2. Re:Who hosts LAN parties anymore ? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      This may be surprising to you, but this probably just means you're old now, possibly with responsibilities or a more diverse social life.

      I've not done a LAN party since CounterStrike 1.6 was new. I would if I had the time, money, and people to attend. Life is too busy now that I've got responsibilities to even consider something like that.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Who hosts LAN parties anymore ? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      True, life is indeed busy, but I am as irresponsible today as I was in the 90's. Well, okay, I've ditched the coke habit... But like I said, the guys who used to LAN party, well now we just party normal. We've all got pimped-out gaming rigs, and we're not all that interested in moving said rigs from their carefully arranged nests. And the monitors, they're big and heavy, sometimes mounted on flex arms for triple-surround EyeFinity or what-have-you. We've got our fancy gaming peripherals, be it a programmable keypad, macro-button mouse or $1500 driving cockpit.

      Back in the DOS days, it was easy to pick up and go, but today high-end gaming is a very elaborate hot-rodding hobby. Do today's active LAN players keep a separate, transport-friendly PC on standby and leave the big rig at home ? That's pretty much the only way I could pull it off, and it would kind of suck because I'm used to my giant LCDs, studio-grade sound and ergonomic layout. It would take me a couple hours to teardown and rebuild my kit.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  21. From a related story.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Google Engineer oldest living virgin. Film at 11"

  22. This is why... by Sez+Zero · · Score: 1

    ... the terrorists hate us?

  23. Don't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The house won't be out of beta for at least 5 years...

  24. 1 master disk does not work well with keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in terms of each system having the same keys will lead to issues. Also with that you need to keep the hardware in each system just about the same.

  25. Re:1989 Called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want their video arcade back

  26. Re:As someone that spends a lot of time in a cabin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your cabin might have a 100 AMP circuit, even down to 50 with some, my house is at 200, but newer ones these days are built with 300, even 500 AMP circuits. I'd have to get a 100 AMP upgrade if I wanted an electric car, which the electric company offered to comp me for, but I've got other needs.

  27. Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Deal. I wired my home with cables also for where my computers will be around the house. I also have my computer connected to my TV, did that way back with my commodore 64.

    Where is the store at?

  28. Why? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    This looks nothing more than a regular internet cafe made for gamers that are a dime a dozen, except it is in his house.....
    so what if you get tired, you can crash on the couch.....the chairs don't even have any cup holders!!!!

  29. The future resembles the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That reminds me of the computer lab at Harvey Mudd College in about 1992-4. Low latency network, IIci Macs at the time and software such as Tank and Spaceward Ho! and others. Hmmm.

    JJ

  30. Re:As someone that spends a lot of time in a cabin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EE Nazi: it's amp, not "AMP". It's the shortened form of ampere, not an acronym for something.

    Your post is good, but the repeated unit abuse just grated on my eyes!

  31. Single? by wiedzmin · · Score: 0

    My guess is - he isn't married?

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.
  32. Obsolete by yanom · · Score: 1

    LAN Parties are largely obsolete. Gamers all now have Internet access good enough for online gaming, and with Skype they can talk to their teammates too.

    --
    "That's either incredibly asinine or the most brilliant troll I've ever read. Not sure which." -Anonymous Coward
    1. Re:Obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that mean physical interaction is obsolete?

    2. Re:Obsolete by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    3. Re:Obsolete by neonKow · · Score: 1

      I'd disagree. It's harder to take a break for Magic or the PS3 online. I've had good internet access and friends to game with for a while now and I still love a good LAN party.

  33. Doesn't count by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

    Unless he did his own network install :)

    still an updates server and streamed SC matches, a heavenly step above your standard fair.

  34. Hi, this is actually my house by Temporal · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi Slashdot! I updated my Blogger/G+ profile to link back to my Slashdot ID, so you can see this is actually me.

    I'm a little disappointed that the submitter linked the Gizmag article instead of the original blog post -- I think a lot of Slashdotters would have found that more interesting, for some of the technical details. Although, even that post is pretty light on details. I'm working on writing a more in-depth description of how I manage the machines. In short: Hooray for PXE boot, iSCSI, and LVM snapshots.

    You'd also be interested to know that I ran several successful LAN parties with all the gaming machines running Ubuntu Linux and WINE. I'd estimate 70% of games worked well (although often not perfect) with this configuration. Sadly, I have recently given in and installed Windows, though the server machine obviously still runs Linux.

    Here are some pictures of the server room, which Slashdot inexplicably won't let me link as HTML: http://goo.gl/BgFpT

    Here is the back-story behind how I ended up with this house.

    As I said, I'll be writing some more blog posts soon with full gory technical details. I'll try submitting them as a new story when they're ready, but you can also subscribe to the blog or follow me on G+ if you're interested.

    1. Re:Hi, this is actually my house by CaseCrash · · Score: 1

      Awesome, thank you for sharing!

      I'll definitely be reading the follow up posts. I'm especially interested in what kind of connection and network you have set up and how you're supporting 12 active connections like that.

      Again, sweet, the cabinets are really cool.

      --
      No, that link you posted to a web comic we've all seen a hundred times is not "obligatory."
    2. Re:Hi, this is actually my house by Temporal · · Score: 1

      It turns out plain old gigabit ethernet is enough bandwidth for all disk I/O for 12 machines. True, they aren't super-fast to load, but no one has ever complained about them being slow either. Go figure.

    3. Re:Hi, this is actually my house by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm a little disappointed that the submitter linked the Gizmag article instead of the original blog post

      Normally we get fully irate when they link some blog post rather than a news article :-)

    4. Re:Hi, this is actually my house by VJmes · · Score: 1

      Love the servers named after Megaman bosses!

      Would love to find out what networking gear you're using for all of this and what sort of online connection (if any) you've got.

    5. Re:Hi, this is actually my house by Temporal · · Score: 1

      All coming in future blog posts. Subscribe or follow me on G+. :)

    6. Re:Hi, this is actually my house by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      Expecting Slashdot to do anything more than criticize and pick apart your awesome house is likely wishful thinking. :-)

  35. Party fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical. With all the design and technical expertise these guys still can't manage to figure out how to put chips in a bowl.

  36. Elo rating in Tetris DS by tepples · · Score: 1

    there are always people that spend waaaaayyy more time on a multiplayer, so I can't even pretend to compete

    Then don't play games with shitty matchmaking. Tetris DS used an Elo-style rating (albeit centered at 5000 instead of 1600) and would usually pair you up with another player with a similar rating.

  37. we got a badass over here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "complete with multiple networked computers and TVs connected to game consoles"

    i think ive been somewhere like that before.

  38. Google does employ some women by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    and Collen Kelly (x twit network) went to work for for Google -