Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Upgrading Windows Users To Latest Version of MSIE

helix2301 writes "Microsoft will be upgrading all Windows XP, Vista and 7 users to the latest IE silently. They are doing this because they have found a large number of non-patched systems. Microsoft pointed out that Chrome and Firefox do this regularly. They will start with Australia and Brazil in January, then go world-wide after they have assured there are no issues."

19 of 476 comments (clear)

  1. start with Australia and Brazil by epedersen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do they start with Australia and Brazil because they do not care about the users there?

    1. Re:start with Australia and Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Australia.... starts with an A
      Brazil... starts with a B

      probably just going down an alphabetical list of major countries.

    2. Re:start with Australia and Brazil by Toe,+The · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, they decided to do it alphabetically. So they spent $13 million conducting market research in which they asked focus groups to name a country that starts with A and another that starts with B. After spending another $4 million running statistical analysis on the results (plus an additional $87 million trying to keep the analysis computers running, since after all they were Windows machines), they came to the conclusion that the ideal A country is Australia and the ideal B country is Brazil. Shortly they will be running a $150 million ad campaign depicting Kermit the Frog and Al Gore traveling from Australia to Brazil.

    3. Re:start with Australia and Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shit! We're next!

      -Canadian AC

    4. Re:start with Australia and Brazil by gman003 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Brazil I imagine has rather high infection rates, due to the high piracy rates (I'm pretty sure Windows_XP_NoWGA_+_Keygen.torrent doesn't have all the patches slipstreamed in).

      Australia is probably just because if the inhabitants can handle thousands of incredibly toxic spiders, scorpions, snakes, fish, and even exploding trees, they can probably handle a browser that's slightly more broken than normal.

    5. Re:start with Australia and Brazil by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Brazil I imagine has rather high infection rates, due to the high piracy rates (I'm pretty sure Windows_XP_NoWGA_+_Keygen.torrent doesn't have all the patches slipstreamed in).

      Australia is probably just because if the inhabitants can handle thousands of incredibly toxic spiders, scorpions, snakes, fish, and even exploding trees, they can probably handle a browser that's slightly more broken than normal.

      "Crikey! This is a really dangerous virus on our computer! I'm going to try to take it by the tail and drag it out of the drive so you can see it. That's quite a magnificient beast, isn't it? Look how it hooks in between layers and takes advantage of vulnerabilities. OK, letting it go again. Watch yer selves!"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. I like there strategy, I like it a lot... by thestudio_bob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They will start with Australia and Brazil in January, then go world-wide after they have assured there are no issues.

    Haha, I guess a big thanks goes out to Australia and Brazil for being the beta testers. Thanks!

    --
    The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
  3. A web developer says thank you! by mrtwice99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know there might be negative ramifications, but I'm glad to see this day arrive. The sooner old IEs die, the better.

  4. Good. by wolrahnaes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fuck IE6. Fuck it hard. Companies that have been dragging their feet on this for years need a hard kick in the ass, and this is how to do it.

    If something breaks because of this, you only have yourself to blame. Anyone still running this shit intentionally knew they were on a path to pain.

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  5. And why are those systems unpatched ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because they are not running Windows updates. at all. And therefore this is not going to have an effect.

  6. We tried a big IE8 rollout last summer by sandytaru · · Score: 5, Funny

    We tried. We really did. Then our users started to complain that their browsing history was gone. Apparently, some of them had never heard of this strange thing called "bookmarks."

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:We tried a big IE8 rollout last summer by Laxori666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm on Chrome. I don't use bookmarks anymore. Just: "r", "g", "d", "s", "st", "sl".

  7. Re:For your own good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And what browser do you use? Firefox? Chrome? both of those already do this. This is actually a good idea. I know that at both my office and my parents house that if a screen comes up asking them to update, it's *close* "I'll update later"... this will go on until I manually run the updates because they don't want updates taking time away from facebook or shopping online. Automatically updating like this will silently fix issues, which is a good thing for the bulk of the population that still uses IE.

  8. Wow, this is going to be interesting... by JMZero · · Score: 5, Informative

    after they have assured there are no issues

    IE 6 is a very, very different browser from IE 9. We've had plenty of clients who can't move off IE 6 (or are in the middle of a large project to do so) because it's the only one that will run their Intranet site correctly. I've seen MS make this type of mistake before - they don't see many public-facing sites using a technology, so they feel safe getting rid of it. Well, yes, very few public-facing sites are going to use crazy IE specific stuff, and most are (by now) going to be making reasonable efforts to work between browsers.

    Intranet sites are a whole other kettle of fish; corporate programmers often target a single browser - and for many of them, that was IE for a long time. They got away with that from IE 4 to IE 6 because MS just added stuff. With IE 7 and, particularly, Vista, they started fixing insecure and non-standard behaviors - and that's part of why so many companies are still on XP and IE 6.

    If MS does this, there will be a lot of pissed off people and gnashing of teeth. I'm not saying it's the wrong choice but "once they've assured there's no issues" sounds pretty silly.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  9. Re:For your own good by DeathFromSomewhere · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    -1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
  10. No! It is a bad idea!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a web developer who actually LIKES IE 6 & IE 7.

    If a client wants IE 6 compatibility, I get to charge them a significant premium. Please MS, don't do this.

  11. Re:For your own good by s1d3track3D · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, this is great in general (assuming they keep aiming for standards compliance) Personal users benefit, developers benefit, browser competition benefits, etc.

    However, I know many Corporations that have in-house applications that can ONLY run on IE6. Often these legacy apps are extremely important for the company and are non-trivial to update to more recent browser versions. (or, the company does not have the resources to work on this)

    For many corp's this will be an IT nightmare.

    (however, I mean really, these Co's have had 20 years to upgrade these app and they have chosen not to, so at some point maybe a 'stick' is needed)

  12. Re:For your own good by hawkinspeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe companies that make stupid "lock-in" decisions should reap the rewards of their own stupidity and short-sightedness.

    --
    You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  13. Re:For your own good by TheRealGrogan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Umm, Firefox and Chrome don't break the system when they update and if they do, it only takes a minute to uninstall and reinstall the desired version. It is also very easy to opt out.

    Internet Explorer upgrades are not something to be taken lightly, because:

    a) They can affect the Windows shell
    b) Programmers may be (correctly or incorrectly) relying on behaviour of its APIs

    Internet Explorer upgrades can break shit.

    Another example, I have noticed that adding IE8 to an older Windows XP computer slows the whole system down. (That sucks when you don't even use the browser)