Slashdot Mirror


Coders Develop Ways To Defeat SOPA Censorship

Hugh Pickens writes "The Atlantic reports that one developer who doesn't have much faith in Congress making the right decision on anti-piracy legislation has already built a workaround for the impending censorship measures being considered, and called it DeSOPA. Since SOPA would block specific domain names (e.g. www.thepiratebay.com) of allegedly infringing sites, T Rizk's Firefox add-on allows you to revert to the bare internet protocol (IP) address (e.g. 194.71.107.15) which takes you to the same place. 'It could be that a few members of Congress are just not tech savvy and don't understand that it is technically not going to work, at all,' says T Rizk. 'So here's some proof that I hope will help them err on the side of reason and vote SOPA down.' Another group called 'MAFIAAFire' decided to respond when Homeland Security's ICE unit started seizing domain names, by coding a browser add-on to redirect the affected websites to their new domains. More than 200,000 people have already installed the add-on. ICE wasn't happy, and asked Mozilla to pull the add-on from their site. Mozilla denied the request, arguing that this type of censorship may threaten the open Internet."

45 of 449 comments (clear)

  1. Good move by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So it's like MafiaaFire/FireIce for SOPA, just like a little custom HOSTS file in the form of a browser addon.

    Technically not brilliant but a good political move, to demonstrate the futility of this legislation.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Good move by AikonMGB · · Score: 5, Funny

      We'll make our own Internet! With blackjack, and hookers!

      Aikon-

    2. Re:Good move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you realise what you've just done?

      Now, I don't know if people of other countries are aware, but there are some things you just don't do because of what you might summon

      You realise that just simply mentioning the file in which hosts can be defined means you have probably cursed this thread with the summoning of APK, the hosts file troll?

      Cue a thread or two of people winding the poor dumb bastard up, as he continues to list his random achievements from 2002 whilst gloating about being a graduate from some non-university no one has ever heard of, with a random littering of grammatically dire pre-written copy and pasted statements including random use of bold text.

      Look, you just can't go around using the name of said file in vain, there are consequences.

    3. Re:Good move by Marc+Madness · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... in fact, never mind the Internet and blackjack!

    4. Re:Good move by elsurexiste · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not futile: it's Congress spurring innovation! Yeah, on workarounds for the law, but innovation nonetheless.

      --
      I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
    5. Re:Good move by JosKarith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So how long before these measures are deemed to be a "Copyright protection system" under the DMCA, rendering any attempt to circumvent them (even by typing in raw IP's) a crime?

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    6. Re:Good move by imakemusic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fuck it, we'll do it live!

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    7. Re:Good move by Blue+Stone · · Score: 5, Informative

      A custom HOSTS file is all well and good, but doesn't take into account the type of censorship that's currently happening in the UK, with BT and SKY, with the Great British Firewall.

      Both ISPs have instituted a blockade on Newzbin using BT's Cleanfeed, which acts as a transparent proxy between the user and the server. Typing in the IP address results in a timeout. Using OnpenDNS or Google's DNS results in the same issue.

      If and when the US pro-censorship copyright cabals lobby for such a technological measure, a custom HOSTS file won't work.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    8. Re:Good move by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Back in 2003 I started designing a Gnutella-like network aimed at being HTTP over P2P, effectively. Centralized server, CGI, distributed caching, end-to-end encryption, the works. It was based in domain resolution via named domain registries, with trust by digital signatures (PKI/PGP)--in other words, my idea of "DNS" was "I want the FOO DNS service and the BAR DNS service," and when I put in www.microsoft.com it would find records signed by FOO and BAR (no matter on who has it). These records may differ, so you would be able to use different "networks" (or really, name spaces). A DNS record would more be a digital ID than anything, too: microsoft.com carries with it a digital signature and certificate, and that is used to identify information from them on the network. It's possible to ask that a certain node verify time/datestamp and signature, so you could send out asking for a thing and have a copy coming down from a random node, which is also asking if it's up to date from the main server, as you ask as well--if not, the client drops that out-of-date page and grabs the new one directly, and the cached copy out on the network is dropped.

      Maybe it's time I stand up and lead...

    9. Re:Good move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      the Great British Firewall.

      Wouldn't that be Hadrian's Firewall?

  2. Who didn't see this coming? by Pichu0102 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Honestly, there really is no way to stop people from getting around every roadblock you put down. Walls can only stretch so far. The only way to prevent them from doing what they want is to either destroy the internet or kill everyone in the country. The first could even be worked around with possibly WiFi meshes or usb drop locations.
    If the government decides to do the second, well, can't exactly get around that when you're dead.

    1. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Point is not to prevent every single person. Just enough of them to kill momentum.

      Point is to make it too bothersome for average person. Which this particular countermeasure is - it is hard enough explain how to torrents downloaded in ideal conditions.

      The fact is that it can very easily switch even geeks. I seriously do not want to waste time researching latest blocking techniques and some more time geting around them.

      If stuff behind lock was something i would not really want to spend money on, i do not bother getting it for "free" anymore anyway. If it is something that matters, actually buying it sounds much more economic.

      Also, it helps to realize that world does not owe you free shit.

    2. Re:Who didn't see this coming? by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      that world does not owe you free shit

      That was the second goal of copyright when it was written. After a fixed period of time, art goes into the public domain.

  3. IP-level blocks by cpghost · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If meddling with DNS doesn't work, network operators will simply be forced to block at the IP level, e.g. by withdrawing the BGP routes to the censored sites. Good luck circumventing this kind of blocking (still possible with proxies, and maybe distributed anonymous p2p proxies, but a nuisance anyway).

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    1. Re:IP-level blocks by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know why sites threatened by this legislation don't already have a darknet presence, what are they waiting for? They should have .i2p and .onion sites online by now.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:IP-level blocks by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Funny

      If meddling with DNS doesn't work, network operators will simply be forced to block at the IP level, e.g. by withdrawing the BGP routes to the censored sites. Good luck circumventing this kind of blocking (still possible with proxies, and maybe distributed anonymous p2p proxies, but a nuisance anyway).

      Wait. Did you just state that there was a way to reliably block sites, sarcastically wish people luck, and then parenthetically note how to defeat your invented scenario?

      In that case: They could isolate all servers with blocks of hardened, compressed layers of dried pasta. Good luck circumventing this kind of blocking (still possible with trained mice who can pull ethernet cables through their tunnels, and maybe wifi on frequencies not blocked by pasta, but a nuisance anyway).

      Kind of fun. Now somebody else go!

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:IP-level blocks by cpghost · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wait. Did you just state that there was a way to reliably block sites, sarcastically wish people luck, and then parenthetically note how to defeat your invented scenario?

      It may look paradox, but that's exactly how it is because that's the way routing in IP backbones is working. Suppose e.g. that your provider is Level-3 based, and Level-3 withdraws the BGP route to TPB to comply with SOPA. However, TPB can also connect to another tier-1 backbone that doesn't filter out its routes. You, behind Level-3 won't be able to access TPB directly, but via proxies, you could exit Level-3 and reach that other backbone, hence reach TPB. Of course, that scenario is more something for techies as it requires constant updating of alternative routes, but the 99.99% of the masses won't be able to circumvent Level-3's IP-level block, and that's all the MAFIAA cares about.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    4. Re:IP-level blocks by cybergrue · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It has been said that the Internet routes around problems (censorship), however there are plenty of choke-points (transoceanic cables for example) where a reverse DNS look-up could be used to filter the IP addresses of the packets going through. And before you say encrypted VPN, the technology already exists and is being used to detect and block encrypted traffic (Pakistan and Turkey) on the network.

      Yes it is possible to get around these countermeasures, but it will not be easy and probably result in a significant decrease in transmission speeds (sending and receiving). And when these techniques become widely known, they will be blocked in turn.

      In short, this legislation will break the Internet. Laughing at the dumb politicians who don't understand technology is a dangerous thing to do because there are no simple workarounds that will keep the Internet working the way we know it if this passes.

    5. Re:IP-level blocks by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every site on the internet is threatened by this legislation.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  4. Now the race begins by timmy.cl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Or maybe now we'll see the race to buy "easy" IP addresses. "Visit us at 12.34.56.78".
    Now, thinking again, that could actually halt the long-awaited migration to IPv6. Who'd like to see an ad like "find our products at http://200147023aef0/. Please remember the square brackets or you won't reach our website. And the double colon between 470 and 23. Unless you want to fill the omitted zeroes."

  5. Congress vs the world's 10-million geek army... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 4, Funny

    Guess who will win?

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:Congress vs the world's 10-million geek army... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Congress. Because they have more resources and weapons at their disposal than all the geeks in the world combined.

      Here, let me give you another example. Do you know why the Berlin Wall fell? No, it wasn't because Reagan gave a speech at the Brandenburger Gate. Or because he managed to fool the USSR into bankrupting itself. It was because when push came to shove, Honecker and Krenz refused to shoot their own people on a scale similar to what China, North Korea or Syria did.

      Oppressive regimes only fall if they're forcibly removed from power, or if they decide that there's a threshold of violence they won't cross.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:Congress vs the world's 10-million geek army... by Scr4tchFury · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The lawyers.

    3. Re:Congress vs the world's 10-million geek army... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Do you know why the Berlin Wall fell?"

      Lots of people pushing at it combined with the fact East German builders haven't got a damn clue about installing a foundation for free-standing structures? Close?

    4. Re:Congress vs the world's 10-million geek army... by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Congress. Because they have more resources and weapons at their disposal than all the geeks in the world combined.

      Congress has more resources, but when it comes down to it, who ends up doing all the technical work? The geeks.

      I hope it doesn't come down to it, but let the geeks implement exactly what the law requires/dictates. As the summary already indicates, the whole intent of the law has been circumvented with trivial workarounds. Pirates end up essentially unaffected and go on pirating, but the internet in general ends up dealing with the consequences when YouTube, Facebook, et al end up blocked/banned/hijacked.

  6. Re:How Is This an Add-On? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    What's to stop me from entering the IP address without the add-on?

    Several things.

    First, you have to know the IP address. The point of one of the the plug-ins, as far as I understand it, is that it automatically gets the list of known seized host names and IP addresses for you.

    Second is that entering the IP manually presumes that an IP address only has one web host on it. This is far from true - with dynamic hosting, lots of domains share the same IP address. It's by the browser sending "Host: www.somewhere.foo" in the header of the request that the web server knows which host's content to serve you. "Host: NNN.NNN.NNN.NNN" is likely only going to give you the hosting provider's web page, or even just a generic "Welcome to Apache" page for those who haven't configured it.

    Oh, and third, have fun entering IPv6 addresses that way...

  7. Touchingly naive by GauteL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "So here's some proof that I hope will help them err on the side of reason and vote SOPA down"

    Eh... no. If the war against drugs/piracy/terrorism has taught us anything, it is that if the law makers were made to understand that it won't work, they would just try more draconian measures.

    By all means, petition them in terms of freedom of speech, cost or restricting innovation, arguing that "The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through" will simply make them tighten their grip further.

  8. Re:How Is This an Add-On? by cpghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Second is that entering the IP manually presumes that an IP address only has one web host on it. This is far from true - with dynamic hosting, lots of domains share the same IP address.

    Nothing prevents a plugin from sending additional HTTP headers (e.g. the Host: header) once the TCP connection has been established to the IP address. No DNS intervention is needed for this.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  9. Re:Firefox Plugin by d4fseeker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Couldn't you just use alternative DNS servers or use a tool which hardcodes it in the 's hosts file or am I missing the point?
    Switching browser due to an extension which hackishly has a static hosts file seems kinda odd for a tech site.

  10. Re:How Is This an Add-On? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nothing prevents a plugin from sending additional HTTP headers (e.g. the Host: header) once the TCP connection has been established to the IP address. No DNS intervention is needed for this.

    Um, you didn't read the post I was replying to, did you? That was exactly my point - a plugin can do that, but manually entering the IP address instead of using a plugin won't.

    And no, the Host: header isn't an additional header - it's a required header (for HTTP/1.1 and above). So a plugin have better replace the Host header that the browser sets, not add one.

  11. Shattered Net by SpinningCone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suspected someone would do this since they were basing blocking on domain. essentially SOPA will kill DNS.

    people will begin passing raw addresses/ports to each other and you will end up with another dark-net, one where there are no domain names or to access it you have to get a hold of a domain file for a plug in.

    soon there will be sites dedicated to the pirate DNS then there will be assholes who distribute bad DNS files leading to pages with drive by attacks. peges will be fighting over their old domain names since there will be no registrar for this dark net.

    this security issue will likely push the P2P DNS efforts already in place.

  12. Re:How Is This an Add-On? by ThosLives · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do this until all possible combinations of words have been used and there are no free domain names.

    Heh... I was actually musing about how to do this with music. After all, there are only so many combinations of notes - why not have computer programs just generating all possible single measures, then all possible combinations of those measures, and publishing them all online with a claimed copyright? (In the US at least, you don't have to spend money to register a work to obtain a copyright - you actually inherently have the copyright. Registering does have benefits though - but it's not required.)

    Essentially, beat them at their own game. (And at the same time prove the silliness of it all. You could probably do the same with works of text as well by using a grammar generator to get legitimate sentences.)

    --
    "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
  13. What we need is a new DNS system by JDG1980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This legislation, combined with the recent domain seizures by ICS, highlights a weakness in the current DNS system: it's far too centralized and way too subject to censorship by governments. Rather than individual, browser-based workarounds, we need a completely new DNS system that is based on some form of distributed computing and lacks a central point of failure. Given the presence of existing protocols like BitTorrent, Tor, and Bitcoin, this should be possible to do.

  14. Re:Firefox Plugin by RivenAleem · · Score: 3, Funny

    But everyone knows that pirates STEAL movies because they don't want to pay for them. Renting a VPS would go against this.

  15. Re:Yeah, because that worked so well in China. by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You misunderstand. I wasn't saying that generic Internet access is impossible in those countries. Even porn in countries like Iran isn't something that's hard to get. What is really, really hard to get is an Internet connection that won't prompt the visits of various burly men in street clothes if you decide to talk about how much better the country would be under a new political system.

    VPN proxies are nice, but are the first things to be stopped when things get hairy (and yes, I also have friends in the countries I listed - except NK).

    Finally, you are also operating under the assumption that countries won't be able to cooperate on these matters. Look at the US: it's implementing the same technologies that the most repressive countries are implementing. Yes, the goals are still somewhat different, but I can guarantee you that once these legal structures are available in all countries, the Internet will not be able to route around damage, because the damage will be applied to the entire Internet.

    Read Lessig's book Code is Law. It makes the interesting observation that code is law - and that consequently, law is code.

    The only alternatives will be encrypted darknets, private nets and other things, but those are not the Internet anymore.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  16. Re:Good old hosts.txt by shish · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This. I wonder if the govt will be publishing a list of banned domains and IP addresses, so the cycle from blocked to unblocked could be fully automated...

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  17. Re:How Is This an Add-On? by imakemusic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After all, there are only so many combinations of notes

    Yeah, have you worked out just how many? Assuming 4 bars of quarter notes and using one chromatic octave (12 notes) and rests: 665,416,609,183,179,841 permutations. And that's only tiny proportion of all realistic possibilities.

    --
    Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
  18. Re:Firefox Plugin by Windows+Breaker+G4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you SEEN congress? I wouldn't put it past them ban ALL dns. Would solve the problem.

    --
    brickspeed.net for your old Volvo performance addiction
  19. asymmetrical warfare by Phoenix666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is asymmetrical warfare in cyberspace, except all the resources of congress don't count for squat here. Even a small group of motivated and skilled hackers can defeat anything congress can throw at them because congress has no conception of how technology works. Even the contractors they hire are not skilled (ever see a government IT project?). FBI? Please, would a skilled programmer work on cool stuff in the free market for more than six figures or for $50K and more bureaucracy and drudgery than you can shake a stick at at the FBI? Let's stop propagating the "government is omnipotent" meme.

    Incidentally the Berlin Wall didn't fall for the reason you stated. I was there then. It fell because Hungary and Czechoslovakia stopped closing their borders to Austria and thousands of East Germans decided to "vacation" there. They crossed over, caught a bus north and hey presto were in the west. East Germany couldn't stop them because of warsaw pact treaties and because russia under gorbachev wouldn't change them. So the government of erich honneker destabilized, was replaced with egon krenz, who in a bid to stop the whole country emptying out opened the wall so easterners could visit and come back. That is why it fell.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  20. Re:Even worse.... by StuartHankins · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually there is a new organization responsible for that, and your "ICUP" is nearly on target. It's still a small group, but the 2 girls involved have a homepage... oops sorry I can't locate it. But Google should be able to help you.

  21. Re:Firefox Plugin by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can they make a DNS server illegal?

    By passing a law? That's how anything becomes illegal.

  22. Re:How Is This an Add-On? by ThosLives · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, but only so many of those combinations "sound good" - you can probably algorithmically eliminate ones that would make no sense. After all, the goal would be to "protect" the good music, not the "noise."

    Rules of music theory are simple enough to dramatically reduce the number of combinations.

    (I never said such a thing would be practical, just that it would be theoretically possible. I actually got the idea from the little short story about "society that never forgets" and the unintended consequences of indefinite copyright.)

    --
    "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
  23. Response from my senator by Pawnn · · Score: 5, Informative

    The other day I decided to send a note to my senator urging him not to pass SOPA.

    Here's the response I got. It made me sad.
    Dear Joshua,

    Thank you for contacting me regarding S. 968, the Protect IP Act.

    Intellectual property industries employ more than 19 million people, making it an integral part of our economy. Rogue websites dedicated to the sale and distribution of counterfeit goods and pirated content are a direct threat to these jobs and to entrepreneurs growing and building legitimate businesses online.

    Businesses have lost $135 billion in revenue annually as a result of these rogue sites. Customers have also been harmed by these sites; for example, online pharmacies that don't adhere to U.S. regulations have been reported to cause a rapid increase in prescription drug abuse.

    I am a cosponsor of the Protect IP Act which would cut off foreign websites dedicated to counterfeiting and piracy that steal American jobs, hurt the economy, and harm customers. It would allow the Justice Department to file a civil action against those who have registered or own a domain name linked to an infringing website. The bill does not allow the Justice Department to target domain names registered by a U.S. entity.

    Innovation is a cornerstone of our nation's economic growth. Proper intellectual property protections and incentives ensure that inventors develop products that benefit consumers. Without such incentives for innovators, we risk falling behind places like China and India.

    Again, thank you for contacting me. I look forward to continuing our conversation on Facebook (www.facebook.com/SenatorBlunt) and Twitter (www.twitter.com/RoyBlunt) about the important issues facing Missouri and the country. I also encourage you to visit my website (blunt.senate.gov) to learn more about where I stand on the issues and sign-up for my e-newsletter.

    Sincere regards,
    Roy Blunt United States Senator

  24. Re:Firefox Plugin by drb226 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Soon it will be illegal to own a computer.

  25. Re:Firefox Plugin by bjwest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... or use a tool which hardcodes it in the 's hosts ....

    That "tool" would be called a text editor, or Notepad, for those of you not computer literate.

    --

    --- Keep the choice with the user..