Apple Increases Dominance of Mobile Shopping
bdking writes "If you purchased something online from a mobile device in December, there's a 92% chance you used an iPad or iPhone. And if so, you probably spent more money than someone making an online purchase with an Android or a desktop computer."
this statistic seems unlikely.
Apple iPad and iPhone users are found to have had their personal sense of values warped by the Jobs reality distortion field. Retailers are said to be intrigued.
Deleted
With average orders being over $100 what are people buying that they would use a tablet or phone for instead of a desktop?
I have tried ordering a few things uses a smart phone it kind of sucks unless it is a known item.
Android phones are obviously money-saving devices!
If you can afford an iPhone 4Gs 64GB (€898.99 in my country, no contract) or an iPad 2 Wi-Fi 64GB ( €719.00), it's evident you have plenty more to spend online.
The amount of money one spends and the amount of money one has aren't inherently linked. I seem to remember reading once that Apple users were more likely to have their accounts overdrawn than others. I'm far too lazy to try and dig that up again, so please feel free to consider it unsourced speculation.
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
But if you're an Apple fanboi you've already proven that you like spending lots more money, so why is this news?
"It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
I'd imagine that with the iPad being seen as more of a luxury item and most iPhone users having a bit more disposable income than the 1 cent Android phone owners, it's only natural that this would occur. In other news, Volkswagen owners are 3 times more likely to wear beanies or recycle.
Thats... kinda.. what ... this.. article.. says...
Thus the title... "Apple Increases Dominance of Mobile Shopping".
-- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
How is "90% of all mobile purchases" not "dominating mobile shopping"? It's exactly "dominating the market of people with money to burn", that's what is claimed and no more.
The fact that you somehow read it as "dominating mobile devices market share" or the likes, is your own comprehension problem.
Don't quote me on this.
Boy, just reading through the comments shows that this article really hit a nerve with the Android "fanbois".
If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
You didn't look very hard. There are quite a few, there are even more that $.99 to $3.99. Two bucks is too much for you to contribute to some developer who did a great job of implementing a useful utility?
What I really like about the modern smartphones is that instead of a lot of gadgets I only need to carry one. It's all of the following rolled into one: Map, TomTom, MP3 player, phone, address book, calendar, alarm clock, compass, portable gaming device, portable email device, portable browser, music tuner, metronome, noteblock, etc.
I used to carry an iPod, PDA, mobile phone, metronome/tuner, compass, TomTom, Gameboy, and sometimes even more stuff. I used to buy coats with a lot of big pockets.
Now I just carry a smartphone.
RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor