Slashdot Mirror


Taliban Seizes and Burns PCs, Cell Phones To Stop Obscenity

retroworks writes "As translated from Central Asia Online, Cellular News reports that militants from South Waziristan set ablaze about 300 cellular phones and a number of computers in Wana because the devices were allegedly used to spread obscene materials. Prior to taking the action, they gave everyone fair warning with 'leaflets.' 300 cell phones down, 5 or 6 billion to go.

10 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. Re:hmm.. by InterestingFella · · Score: 3, Interesting

    U.S. already does. 18 year limit for natural love making, but violence is all good! Then when someone does weird porn that minority like (and doesn't hurt anyone), like shitting in mouth, they jail those responsible for filming it. Land of hypocrites.

  2. All your porn are belong to us! by kawabago · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's the Taliban's leaders that should be raided! They all watch porn and force their spouses to wear the Burka so no one will find out it's a MAN! You're not gay if everyone thinks you're with a woman.

  3. The thing is... by bmo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are people in the US that are ready and waiting to do the exact same thing. Some of them are corporations.

    The RIAA and MPAA wish all this would go away.

    The Dominionists and other so-called-Christian radicals (note the location of the hyphen) would burn all modern communications technology and "unchristian books" (meaning anything other than the bible) in a heartbeat.

    --
    BMO

  4. Re:Oh noes by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No need. The US Congress is racing to do that for them. (I wish this was a joke)

  5. Signals Intellegence by Required+Snark · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Clearly, this has an impact on the strategic capabilities of the Talaban.

    There are two possibilities. Either they are eliminating all cell phones, or only the cell phones of the non-Talaban under their control. If the get rid of all cell phones, then their ability to coordinate and send/receive timely information will be seriously impacted. They will become less effective.

    If they keep cell phones for themselves, they become much more obvious targets. It will be easier to listen in on their communications because they will be the only ones talking. Even just detecting a cell phone signal will flag the location of a Talaban member. Not such a good move in the era of loitering UAVs with GPS enabled munitions.

    It's nice when your enemies are such stupid fanatics that they either shoot themselves in the foot, or paint a target on their backs. I hope they find even more ways to use their religious fanaticism screw themselves up.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  6. Close... by msauve · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Taliban Seizes and Burns PCs, Cell Phones To Stop Obscenity"

    Contrast with:
    US Government Seizes and Burns DNS domains, To Stop Copyright Infringement.

    Discuss.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  7. Re:Objective Hide their actual Activities by EdIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Considering the Taliban manual specifically prohibits any Taliban from being alone in a room with an unbearded man (boy), I bet it is so that nobody can record that evidence as well.

    Which is incredibly ironic that they are trying to prevent obscenity when they are predominately pedophiles.

    Before anybody mods this troll..... if it was false why would it have to be in the manual for the Taliban specifically?

  8. Re:Okay, let's examine that decision by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The parent commenter was probably taking pop statistics to calculate that. Figure 6 millions Jews killed (which is not the whole story) and the use the 60 million figure that is commonly touted for Stalin (which is way overestimated according to anything I've read about it; that doesn't make it less heinous, however).

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  9. Re:Okay, let's examine that decision by mirix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How many people did capitalism kill 'directly or indirectly'?

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
  10. Re:Okay, let's examine that decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I am biased since I am a Capt in the Air Force, writing this from Afghanistan. Obviously, I advocate good men taking action to stop evil men from killing.

    Be careful young man when it comes moral absolutes. There are quite a few people who hold that opinion about you. You are an officer in a foreign invading military - a military that has killed innocent civilians.

    And what no one else has mentioned is that under the Taliban, the Afgan opium trade was just about destroyed. Now, it's quite alive and well - which is also considered "evil" by our government.

    The fact is that those "evil" people you are killing were not considered evil by the US government not too long ago.