Slashdot Mirror


Russia Building World's Largest Li-Ion Battery Plant

MikeChino writes "Russia and China are gearing up to dominate the lithium-ion battery industry by launching the world's largest Li-ion plant (press release). Planned for Novobirsk, Russia, the facility will be a joint venture between Chinese firm Thunder Sky and RUSNANO (a Russian state-run corporation) and it will be able to produce up to 500,000 batteries (of all sizes) per year."

128 comments

  1. Li? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And where are they getting all the lithium from?

    1. Re:Li? by InterestingFella · · Score: 2

      China and Russia? Those two are among the major producers of lithium.

    2. Re:Li? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their shrink

    3. Re:Li? by nwf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China and Russia? Those two are among the major producers of lithium.

      And the two counties with the lowest product standards and safety laws.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    4. Re:Li? by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      Contrary to many scare reports, lithium is not particularly rare or expensive -- under $10 a kilogram for lithium carbonate, which is used to make a dozen or two percent of the mass of batteries that sell for hundreds of dollars per kilogram. It's a couple percent of the cost. The main risk for lithium is temporary supply shortages, where demand outgrows production rates (it takes many years to get a new mine started). And of course, everyone wants to produce the cheapest stuff, but the cheapest stuff isn't always in the best of locations (producing from seawater -- a basically boundless supply -- costs ~$30 or so per kilogram of carbonate, versus a couple dollars per kilogram from a good lithium-rich playa.

      It's not batteries that will be displaced by elevated lithium prices, but the other uses, which currently make up the vast majority of lithium consumption -- alloys, greases, glass, ceramics, etc.

      --
      Future headline #86: "GM to Recall Three Remaining Cars"
    5. Re:Li? by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not even close. The problem in both is failure in making companies follow the laws that are in place, not making laws. At least a third of countries in the world has worse product standards and safety laws then China and Russia.

    6. Re:Li? by InterestingFella · · Score: 2

      There are numerous other countries with shittier conditions than China and Russia. The latter one is generally quite good, actually. China too, especially compared to the truly cheap countries.

    7. Re:Li? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    8. Re:Li? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      A rise in prices will make the market enticing to Bolivia, so I doubt there will be a shortage for very long.

    9. Re:Li? by ae1294 · · Score: 1, Funny

      And where are they getting all the lithium from?

      From American medicine cabinets.

    10. Re:Li? by ae1294 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are numerous other countries with shittier conditions than China and Russia. The latter one is generally quite good, actually. China too, especially compared to the truly cheap countries.

      Yes yes, Russian products still use trusty vacuum tube! Not like in west. Our mono stereo sys-tems truly go to eleven, perhaps even twelve if you run outside in winter times or heating not working.

    11. Re:Li? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please cite this and explain. Until then I call bullshit.

    12. Re:Li? by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      Well, it is all about comparative qualities, not absolute ones. Low or not, Russian product standards happen to be the highest available today. If you can find better ones - feel free to buy your batteries from them instead.

    13. Re:Li? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ it's a Li-ion, get it in the car [wikia.com]

      I want someone to produce a Titanium-Germanium based cell as well, just so I can make a bad joke about a Ti-Ger.

    14. Re:Li? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Actually, Russia has some pretty stringent standards for its products, largely inherited from the USSR. So much so that "Soviet quality" is a frequent advertising slogan. I understand that most Westerners think of cars first and foremost when they encounter the words "Russian" and "quality" in the same sentence, but there are many more industries in the country, and many of them are much better at what they do.

    15. Re:Li? by Mista2 · · Score: 2

      NAd just in time for Li-Ion to be replaced by Li-poly.

    16. Re:Li? by Skal+Tura · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually Ladas are quite high quality make, some important parts from ladas are used in rally.
      They are known to be quite reliable too (the old RWD ones), up to a certain point. They can't take as much wear in general, but until they are worn out they are damn reliable ones.

      The better models have intriguing accessories too, one would not expect to see in many cars, sport version a friend owned had voltage, rpm, oil press, oil temp gauges, surprisingly fuel injected for such an old car, and other neat little things.

      Also the lesser models were tuned for the russian cheap gasoline, for our usage you could easily tune it up to produce quite a bit more within an single night, changing the tune up for the higher quality fuel we got.

      Parts are tremendously cheap too.

      They are meant to be cheap commodity cars, and for that purpose i think they did quite well. The newer ladas tho ... They all seem to suck and have shoddy quality.

      Disclaimer: I've never owned a lada, i've only driven a lada once (and i hated it, was some reaaally old model with funky steering wheel angle), and will not own one. I'm simply a fan of classic, simple, RWD cars.

    17. Re:Li? by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Illusian planes come to mind with theirn stellar safety record and the famous Lada manufacturer where cars can go sometimes hundreds of miles before a major breakdown.

    18. Re:Li? by Smerta · · Score: 0

      Hi Peggy. I like your commercials.

  2. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, battery charges YOU!!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by InterestingFella · · Score: 1

      Oh look, AC fails...

      In Soviet Russia, YOU charge the battery.

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia by paiute · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In Communist China, battery is fully charged. Please ignore actual reading on dial.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    3. Re:In Soviet Russia by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      In Soviet America, you are charged with battery with a battery!

    4. Re:In Soviet Russia by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      Nope, nope, sorry.

      In Soviet Russia, battery replace YOU!

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    5. Re:In Soviet Russia by turkeyfish · · Score: 0

      Evidently, this doesn't seem to have deterred Wal-Mart. At least we can begin to see where leadership in technological development is going to come from. One can only hope that the Tea-Party republicans are paying attention.

    6. Re:In Soviet Russia by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Evidently, this doesn't seem to have deterred Wal-Mart. At least we can begin to see where leadership in technological development is going to come from. One can only hope that the Tea-Party republicans are paying attention.

      To what? They all buy nice GERMAN products...

    7. Re:In Soviet Russia by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In Communist China, battery is fully charged. Please ignore actual reading on dial.

      ... and keep pedaling.

    8. Re:In Soviet Russia by dave87656 · · Score: 2

      Only if the Liion is under 18.

  3. At least the workers by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 3, Funny

    will never feel bad about working there.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    1. Re:At least the workers by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

      But mood stabilization also nixes the irrationally happy workers who bring in donuts for everyone.

  4. So.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just how big is this battery going to be?

    1. Re:So.. by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 3, Funny

      Probably large enough to power a car but not large enough to threaten your deluded sense of manliness.

    2. Re:So.. by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Probably large enough to power a car but not large enough to threaten your deluded sense of manliness.

      OMG, LOL

      that is all.

  5. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We battery YOU!

  6. Li-Ion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus Christ, it's a Li-Ion! Get in the Ca-ar!

    1. Re:Li-Ion by cosm · · Score: 3, Funny

      Jesus Christ, it's a Li-Ion! Get in the Ca-ar!

      the chemistry cat
      wants his puns back
      before they argon

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    2. Re:Li-Ion by sreid · · Score: 1

      How about the chemical workers--are they unionized?

    3. Re:Li-Ion by cosm · · Score: 1

      How about the chemical workers--are they unionized?

      Ziiiiiiinnnnggg! Subtle is your pun, but malicious it is not. I'm guessing their work-force has bonded quite covalently. I wonder their lithium potentials are strong enough to work in bipolar junctions?

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  7. Cheap electric cars! by naroom · · Score: 1

    On the upside, electric cars should become much more affordable.

    1. Re:Cheap electric cars! by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      On the upside, electric cars should become much more affordable.

      Muhahhahaha..... just no....

  8. If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This might just kick the electric car into mainstream mass production, as the cost of reasonable battery technology falls below production costs with illegal subsidies.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Scareduck · · Score: 1

      Meh. Even with idiotic US subsidy, the cars lack range, a consequence of poor energy density. Acceptance of second-rate cars is necessarily minimal.

      --

      Dog is my co-pilot.

    2. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Li-Ion can fix this to a large extent. The Tesla's 6000 Li-Ion batteries give it a 200 mile range at freeway speeds- and a 54 mile range at racetrack speeds. Plasma Boy's White Zebra here in Oregon gets 300 miles to a charge at highway speeds- or can go into drag race mode, and dump the full charge of the batteries into a quarter mile in under 9 seconds.

      But Li-Ion is very expensive currently- which is why I said what I said. Chinese subsidized Solar Panels pushed solar below $1/watt, and made companies like SolarCity profitable for the first time ever. I could easily see something similar happening with say, the 40 mile range on the plug-in-electric Ford Focus to bring it's costs down to what normal people can afford.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

      Yes, but coupled with highly efficient internal combustion engines that kick in only once in a while, humans could save burning a lot of fossil fuel and spare ourselves of much of the adverse consequences associated with unnecessarily warming the atmosphere.

      It seems kind of sad that its the Russians and the Chinese who are generating both the business mojo and jobs. It looks as if America is too jaded to act, perhaps because it just doesn't seem cool or limit the freedom of the American worker to go unemployed.

    4. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It is rather inefficient to lug big, heavy combustion engines around. What electric cars need to be efficient are the same features that are needed to make a really efficient petrol car: A small vehicle, very lightweight in construction. Basically a European car - but that is something that just won't work in the US market, where customer expectations are quite different.

    5. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Until the Chinese start to jack up the prices, after they control the market. That's the purpose of dumping (selling below production cost): to destroy competition, opening the door to unrestrained price increases. It's an investment in monopoly.

      Solar prices are temporarily dropping rapidly because of Chinese dumping. Chinese companies (that aren't connected enough to maintain subsidies and dump their own panels) are already starting to fold, as are others around the world. After China has the last suppliers standing, they will jack their prices up.

      Of course they will do this with Li-Ion, too. They will do it everywhere. That's the kind of unrestrained capitalism a mafioso Communist state can generate.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically a European car - but that is something that just won't work in the US market, where customer expectations are quite different.

      I live in Minnesota. If it can reach highway speeds, operate in cold weather and has a range greater than 20 miles between charges, I'm psyched. It doesn't have to be appealing to half the population, just the ones with the intent to specifically own an electric car.

    7. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I doubt they would bother if the sale price was so low they would have to subsidize it. On the contrary, this is likely to be a major money-maker for them.

      Subsidies are usually for established industries that are no longer competitive, or that are have some sort of political utility, not for new cutting edge industries.

      Just because certain subsidies are illegal under WTO doesn't mean that legitimate investments by governments are banned, or that government owned businesses are banned.

    8. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Within China, dumping is illegal and is punished by the death penalty.

      It is popular here in the US to accuse China of "dumping" whenever they're selling something cheaper than we could have made it, but it never seems to be actually cheaper than they did make it for... and so it isn't actually dumping.

      Cheap Chinese products do not get followed by expensive Chinese products, they get followed by even cheaper Chinese products!

      The dumping meme is surely being dumped at below it's cognitive value.

    9. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It does seem to be sold cheaper than China makes it. That is what is putting Chinese solar businesses out of business, that aren't connected enough to the subsidies. Even though they all benefit from the currency manipulation that makes it harder for non-Chinese companies to compete with them.

      And what makes you say that cheap Chinese products don't get followed by expensive Chinese products? When has China cornered a market before, as it's doing now with lithium? And when has cornering a market by anyone ever been followed by cheaper products instead of more expensive ones? When has selling below cost ever continued after the competition has been eliminated by it?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

      Perhaps so, but the Prius is pretty popular worldwide and Toyota is making quite a bit of money off their sales. Getting 50+mpg isn't bad either.

    11. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      and thus taxed to death.
      Electricity used to replace fuel?
      Goverments solution:
      1) Introduce taxes at the same level as fuels have on electricity (~80% of consumer price or more, currently about 80% being raised few % next year)
      2) Increase fuel taxes due to lesser consumption

      That's how we roll here in Finland.

    12. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      Getting 50+mpg is nothing new.
      Buy an old Renault Clio, every time it breaks, just buy a new one. You get so much better mileage on the Clio that it's free compared to getting a Prius (and batteries swapped every few years).

      Those tiny cars at best ~4L/100km or less at highway. That's over 60mpg. That's quite good for a car which costs today probably less than your computer.

    13. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The other use of such subsidies would be to temporarily lower the price to kick everybody else out of the market.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    14. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      There is no record of them doing that in any of the cases where they've been accused of it. In every case their costs really are that low, and they maintain low prices.

      Actually that sort of market manipulation carries the death penalty in China.

    15. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      There is a long history of this accusation, and it never turns out to be true.

      It seems to be sold cheaper than it would cost... some other country to make them. People take some number that is either from western manufacturing or a consultant's estimate, and then they think of that as "how much it costs to make foo." Except, that is only how much it would cost them.

      When the whole reason for thinking somebody else is dumping is because they're selling cheaper than you could produce it, that's called a false accusation.

      And if they did do it, they'd have to pay back all their illegal profits from after they raised prices, under WTO rules. Mostly that would be assessed by the WTO court approving X billions of dollars in tariffs that the victims would be allowed to assess.

    16. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Just this month the WTO upheld a 2009 US anti-dumping tariff on imported Chinese tires.

      The US solar panel association split a couple of months ago, with US-only companies leaving the original org because its Chinese owned or controlled member corps were preventing the org from getting the US government to oppose China's dumping. The new org has already got the US government working on fighting the dumping.

      Dumping happens. This is what it looks like. And this is what it looks like when the US government actually defends the country from foreign competitors attacking us unfairly.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      They're able to dig sand cheaper?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    18. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Uhmmm.... yes.

      Like, duh.

    19. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      So automation counts for nothing in efficiency?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    20. Re:If China treats this like they did Solar Panels by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They have more automation than we do, where it saves a lot a money.

      If a factory wants 1000 robots, they have 100,000 people to make them.

      Also, plentiful low cost educated workers serve a very similar function to industrial automation and is a sort of automation in itself.

  9. Novosibirsk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is no Novobirsk in Russia. It is most likely Novosibirsk ().

    1. Re:Novosibirsk by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0

      Pendant.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Novosibirsk by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Pedant.

      Yes, I know.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Novosibirsk by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      There isn't any Novosibirsk either, though there is a .

    4. Re:Novosibirsk by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      wow censored by slashdot. Well we may not be able to say the name here, but it isn't Novosibirsk.

    5. Re:Novosibirsk by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Whoosh *

      * The sound a swinging pendant makes

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:Novosibirsk by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you were trying to say, but "Novosibirsk" is an accurate Latin transliteration of the Russian word.

    7. Re:Novosibirsk by vst · · Score: 1

      nice signature. it just crashed my box... not that i didn't know what will happen, but i just had to do it :D :D :D

    8. Re:Novosibirsk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you disregard pronunciation, yes. For an English speaking audience Novesibeersk would be closer.

    9. Re:Novosibirsk by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      He was talking about transliteration, not transcription. Novosibirsk is an accurate transliteration.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  10. world's largest??? by sribe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    500,000 batteries per year is considered that large? When Apple is selling close to 20,000,000 iPads/year? And iPhones, and all the PC manufacturers laptops/netbooks, and all the Android phones, and all the other phones? What do they all do, buy batteries from dozens of different manufacturers for each of their popular products? Really?

    1. Re:world's largest??? by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Informative

      500,000 batteries per year is considered that large? When Apple is selling close to 20,000,000 iPads/year? And iPhones, and all the PC manufacturers laptops/netbooks, and all the Android phones, and all the other phones? What do they all do, buy batteries from dozens of different manufacturers for each of their popular products? Really?

      Those piddly little things are called cells. If you only have on in a device, yes you might call it a battery, but you would be bringing shame to the likes of REAL batteries. In TFA, they have a pic of a 40V/40AH *battery* which means it can deliver 1600 WH, or the equivalent of around 1,000 of those piddly little "batteries" you refer to that inhabit iThings.

    2. Re:world's largest??? by lindi · · Score: 1

      How much energy can the iPad battery hold? The article talks about 200 Ah (3.7*V*200*A*3600*s = 2.6 MJ?).

    3. Re:world's largest??? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's the world's largest plant, but other battery sellers must have lots of plants. And yes, big device manufacturers often buy from multiple suppliers.

      Maybe this is a big plant, but it doesn't see like it's going to do much to "dominate the lithium ion battery industry."

    4. Re:world's largest??? by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you read the original article, evidently something the original poster didn't do all that carefully, it says they expect to be able to produce enough batteries to power 500,000 buses per year. It seems that the Russians and the Chinese are busy preparing to dominate the world battery for vehicles market, while we are hung up on our iPads.

    5. Re:world's largest??? by pz · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that photo is impressive.

      1600 WH, for those who are uncalibrated, is approximately enough power to run a hair dryer non-stop for an hour: the maximum amount of power you can get out of a standard US wall outlet, for a solid hour straight. It would run your laptop for 2 to 3 years without sleeping. In other words, a highly non-trivial amount of electrical oomph.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    6. Re:world's largest??? by snarkh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that photo is impressive.

      1600 WH, for those who are uncalibrated, is approximately enough power to run a hair dryer non-stop for an hour: the maximum amount of power you can get out of a standard US wall outlet, for a solid hour straight. It would run your laptop for 2 to 3 years without sleeping. In other words, a highly non-trivial amount of electrical oomph.

      You are off by two orders of magnitude. This 6-cell battery is approximately 55Wh and is rated for 8 hours. Thus a 1600wh battery is enough to run your laptop for about 30 times as much, which is 240 continuous hours. That's 10 days.

    7. Re:world's largest??? by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Not world's biggest plant. The plant builds the world's biggest batteries. Due to a translation error, the batteries measure 1m on a side.

      --
      -
    8. Re:world's largest??? by sribe · · Score: 1

      Not world's biggest plant. The plant builds the world's biggest batteries. Due to a translation error, the batteries measure 1m on a side.

      Ah, that's more like it. Although I focused on number of batteries made in a year, I also find it highly unlikely that 40,000 square feet was the world's largest factory for *anything*. Here's hoping you get modded up soon ;-)

    9. Re:world's largest??? by bertok · · Score: 1

      That puts some things into perspective.

      Imagine trying to build a battery-based energy storage system for intermittent power sources, like wind or solar.

      The entire yearly output of batteries from this factory would be able to buffer less than an hour of the power from a 1 GW power plant!

      Compared to our ability to generate power, our capability to store it is still quite poor.

    10. Re:world's largest??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my laptop draws 65w for 24 hours that's 1.56kwh, right? hrmm...that's not even close to 10 days, let alone 3 years. lol.

    11. Re:world's largest??? by snarkh · · Score: 1

      I doubt your laptop really draws 65 watt's though. Seems a bit too much for a portable running on battery power.

  11. Awesome Company Name by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

    Thunder Sky is an awesome name. RusNano pales in comparison, then straight up faints. I'd love to see more of these odd pairings... "Thai company Robogasm has announced plans to build a microprocessor plant with British owned Drolltech". "African firm KittenRocket's joint venture with Spain's SpainSoft has analysts excited". "Destiny Blaster LLC of Florida is building a plant in Canada with local firm Polite Neighbor Software Inc".

  12. looks like waste of lithium by SergeyKurdakov · · Score: 1

    from press release it is clear, that the plant is not for plug in hybrids market ( and the possible answer - is low quality,which in below the current plugin batteries ). For buses and for grid storage - molten salt batteries are preferred ( because materials are much more abundant and cheaper and for these applications the biggest problems of molten salt batteries ( high temperature ) could be of less significance than in cars ). There are examples of such uses http://asmoronurhadi.blogspot.com/2011/03/tindo-worlds-first-solar-electric-bus.html and http://engineering.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/2011/03/11/so-what-battery-technology-powers-our-electric-bus/ etc, there are new developments http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/low-temperature-molten-salt-battery-ten.html http://www.greencarcongress.com/2011/11/sumitomo-2011111.html in this field, which could make molten salt batteries even more attractive. and if to consider, that lithium reserves are quite limited - mass production of low quality batteries seems a strange idea. I can't say for any good reasons for RUSNANO except they need to spend huge money on something ( they have a big budget and just few mostly idiotic projects )- it is moronic organization which is run by the man who put Russia into poverty in 90s due to badly designed reforms and any degree of idiotism could be expected, but what drives Chinese in this venture is an intresting question. It might turn out, that both sides are driven by bureaucratic logic and thus the project has no real value.

    1. Re:looks like waste of lithium by durrr · · Score: 1

      Laptops, cameras, tablets, smartphones, electric bikes and everything robotic weighing less than a car sure is a tiny market and doesn't benefit at all from more batteries availible...
      Oh wait...

    2. Re:looks like waste of lithium by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      But not a bad way to accumulate a lot of lithium while it's still widely available.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    3. Re:looks like waste of lithium by emilper · · Score: 1

      they put it in Novosibirsk, which means the batteries won't be exported ... the army needs batteries too :)

      Not sure all the projects are idiotic ... they might not make sense per se, but you need to train engineers and line managers before you get to build the real stuff, no matter how good your research and design team is.

      Worked with a couple of guys from Novosibirsk, they were good ... to bad the management was crap, but the management was in yet another country.

    4. Re:looks like waste of lithium by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because more supply in the market for batteries that weigh tens or hundreds of pounds will have all sorts of influence on the market for sub-1 pound batteries used in laptops, cameras, tablets and phones.

    5. Re:looks like waste of lithium by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Lithium is extremely common, being element #3 and all.

    6. Re:looks like waste of lithium by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Molten salt batteries are nice for grid storage (though I gather flow batteries ha an advantage there: If space is no object, it'll give you the lowest Ah-per-$), but.. busses? Do you really want to put something inside a bus that, in the event of a crash, will either explode or splash molten salt over the passangers?

      Li-ion does have the advantage of being an established, tested technology, and only dangerous if you are stupid enough to short one.

      The situation with molten salt will change if Sumitomo's developments pay off and get it down to the claimed 57c, but I'm dubious regarding how well they'll live up to the press release. Doing it in the lab is one thing, a bus is quite another.

      Also, molten salt would be useless for cars... the cells take time to warm up! No-one will buy a car that needs to be warmed up ten minutes in advance of any journey. Not a problem for busses, when all trips are scheduled in advance.

    7. Re:looks like waste of lithium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - the Russians and Chinese forming this venture have made a grave mistake, and should have consulted with you first on the question of efficiency, among other things.

      Alas, if they had only written about their intent to do this, then read the Slashdot comments, they could have saved so much money...

    8. Re:looks like waste of lithium by SergeyKurdakov · · Score: 1

      no cells do not warm up, they are kept warm all the time using insulation ( consider that on the other temp range is a liquid hydrogen and it it stored for quite a while in cars ), the insulation adds cost, but less, than difference between lithium and molten salt cost. for that reason molten salt vehicles work ok at - 40 C while lithium cars just stop working. also molten salt does not explode, though can splash, but in buses it is situated such that it is last thing to be hit from outside. li ion batteries actually is a sort of relatively recent breakthrough, that is why so much hype around. but there are other alternatives, btw, such as aluminium air or zink air batteries (and even li air batteries). there are still problems with them - but at the cost/weight side - they are the only batteries which can compete with gasoline, so it is really strange that instead of attempts to improve in a way which can finally resolve gasoline dependance relatively scarce lithium is wasted.

    9. Re:looks like waste of lithium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes no sense whatsoever. It's like saying Gold is more prevalent than Lead, because it occurs earlier on the periodic table of elements..

    10. Re:looks like waste of lithium by haruchai · · Score: 1

      The Sumitomo battery, if successful, would be a much cooler, safer version of the ZEBRA battery which powered vehicles over several million miles. Due to the thermal mass of the battery, even without insulation, it would take some time to cool down.

      Also, for any rational design, a crash so bad that the battery burst and sprayed the passengers, would be doing so over their already cooling corpses.
      I haven't looked into flow batteries for a while but I think the molten-salt, whether high or moderate temp probably has them beat on cost.
      Of course the ability to easily drain and replenish your depleted electrolyte is very attractive.
      I would expect that the molten-salt battery would be great for city fleet vehicles, postal or delivery vans and even as a diesel-electric hybrid for long haul trucks.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  13. Good Luck with That by Kagato · · Score: 1, Informative

    A lot fo american companies went into Russia in the 90s and most of them got burned. The corruption in Russia makes Chinese corruption look quaint. One company I worked for would send crates full of high tech computers and equipment to the factories in Russia, only to find a bunch of rocks in the crates when they opened them up in the factory.

    1. Re:Good Luck with That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I look forward to watching the results of this investment (corrupt China investing in corrupt Russia).

  14. Novobirsk? by Svenne · · Score: 2

    For some reason, the summary says Novobirsk. It should of course be Novosibirsk.

    --

    Slagborr
    1. Re:Novobirsk? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Washington, Wangton, same thing!

    2. Re:Novobirsk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ivan: "can I buy a wowel, Wanna?

    3. Re:Novobirsk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt any /. spellchecker would pick up the correct spelling.

      For those who don't have a clue, Novosibursk is the 3rd largest City in Russia and the capital of Siberia.I worked there from time to time in the 90's.

  15. Largest, by what measure? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    The article alludes to the plant's status as "largest" is due to the fact that it is 40,000 sq. feet (quote: "The collaborative facility, named Liotech, will have an area exceeding 40,000 square feet – making it the largest lithium-ion battery factory in the world.")... But in the US a plant recently opened totaling 291,000 sq. feet (see http://ir.a123systems.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=506787 ). Which is it? Largest by cell count perhaps?

    1. Re:Largest, by what measure? by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 1

      It's supposed to be 40,000 square meters (check the press release) which would be >400,000 square feet.

  16. Novosibirsk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean Novosibirsk?

  17. Novobirsk? by idji · · Score: 2

    Is that a city in Beria, or do you mean Novosibirsk in Siberia? Please spell check before you submit.

  18. Yo Dawg by bwayne314 · · Score: 1

    I heard you like battery, so we put some batteries in your bat so you can battery while you batter.

  19. Someone Screwed Up the Rewrite by turkeyfish · · Score: 4, Informative

    Perhaps the poster should have read the article. The 500,000 figure comes from the number of buses they expect to be able to equip with batteries each year. It seems while we can't even read, the Chinese and the Russians are moving ahead to OWN the battery market for vehicles.

  20. Not Really. by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    Maybe the Chinese figure that if they ship large quantities of lithium to Russia for use in their green bus technology efforts, they will build out their lithium industrial manufacturing base, and help them further dominate the alternative energy technology markets.

    Given our addiction to products like iPads and cellphones, we will buy them at any price and since most of that production is already in China now, our economy simply serves as a conduit to feed theirs. They have to do something with all those dollars we are sending them right? It would seem that Chinese energy plans are light-years ahead of those in the US, where corporations are doing all they can to keep us dependent on post-peak oil. The location of the plant makes sense, as its not too far from Chinese lithium sources, so freight costs on their expanding rail networks will actually work to their advantage providing a double pay off to two industries, as well as strengthening their strategic ties with the neighbors.

    1. Re:Not Really. by cavreader · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Please cease the cheer leading for China. They deal with any country in the world that can provide them with cheap resources. They are extreme pragmatists (which is not totally bad) and don't give a shit about anything as long as they get what they want. Environmental protection, rouge regimes of all kinds, and worker safety do not enter into the way they conduct business. If the US operated in the same manner they would be criticized even more than they are already. And it has been predicted that China is going to surpass the US economy and that China is taking US manufacturing jobs but the US still has the highest GDP and is still the number one manufacturer in world with 1/3 of the population China. China has started posting trade deficits after years of surpluses. Some of their rising trade deficits are due to their increased food imports from the US by a factor of 6 over the past 5 years. Currency manipulation is their economic weapon of choice to make sure thier exports are cheap. However, they have pushed the currency manipulation as far as possible and the cost of their exports are rising which is creating opportunities for others to compete. This has also led to a high level of inflation in the country which will also contribute raise the costs of their exports because the workers will require higher salaries to compensate for the inflation. If the Chinese government can not control this trend they would be in danger of destabilizing the country. The only thing they offer to the international market is low prices. Quality and innovation are absent in their economic system. And if push ever came to shove the US could increase import tariffs and impose import quotas because China does not supply anything the US can not produce domestically or obtain from someone else. Contrary to popular belief China is also not loaning the US money. They are making investments that they consider low risk. They only account for approximately 6% of the outstanding US bonds and securities so they hardly own the country.

  21. That's Nothing by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    500,000 batteries a year? Google just activated 37 million Android devices in a single day, 74 times as much. The world would need over 22,000 of these factories to keep up, if that rate persists, as it will soon enogh, for only Android devices. How is this a big deal?

    It's good for China and Russia to have mutual trade in high-tech stuff that's cheap. If the world's consumers can be organized to force the two countries to clean up their filthy lithium refining industry (the reason it's cheaper in places like Russia and China), that would clean things up and give Russia and China more work in this productive industry. Which is a good alternative to the gangster alternatives.

    And better than the war between Russia and China that has raged periodically for dozens, even hundreds or thousands of years.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  22. Re:So, if... by ae1294 · · Score: 0

    I think he fails at life altogether.

  23. factory capacity 1 GWh by jfb2252 · · Score: 1

    From the press release: "The new factory has design capacity of more than 1 GWh"

  24. in Soviet Russia, the battery spies on you by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    actually, that's a beautiful way to get secrets from Americans

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    1. Re:in Soviet Russia, the battery spies on you by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked most of American secrets were secret for one reason only: so that no one would know that these secrets were stolen from Russians in the first place.

    2. Re:in Soviet Russia, the battery spies on you by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Mr Chekhov, is that you? Stop messing around on the Internet and get back on course, please.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  25. Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...Thank you for calling USA-One Credit. My name Peggy..."

  26. read planet instead of plant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I misread it as planet instead of plant for some reason... hahaha battery planet...

  27. Titanium Germanium batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, they've already mastered Titanium-Germanium batteries (Ti-ger), so all they need to do is combine that with their Li-Ion factories to make Tigons and Ligers, which are always awesome.

  28. Ordinary table salt is a mood enhancer. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Ordinary sodium chloride. Doesn't have to be lithium.

    http://www.science20.com/news_releases/salt_may_be_antidepressant_which_would_also_explain_why_its_addictive

    Some people may use too much in order to counteract depression. Or perhaps, modern diet being high in salt causes depression when salt levels drop.

    --
    Deleted
  29. Had to happen by lfp98 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunate, perhaps, that's it's happening in Russia, but this is precisely what is needed to get the move to electric vehicles into gear: a massive high-risk investment in mass production of lithium batteries. The raw materials for lithium batteries are not rare or expensive; the high cost is due to the sophistication of the manufacturing process. But with sufficient investment in high-volume output, those costs can be brought down, just as with other high-tech commodities like hard drives or memory sticks. American battery makers like A123 and EnerDel have been unwilling or unable to make those investments on a sufficient scale and remain low-volume, high-cost producers. Try to buy a large-format, vehicle-grade lithium cell, and you'll find several companies willing to sell them, all Chinese. The sad truth is that batteries may have to be imported in order to compete with gasoline in cost per vehicle-mile, but that's still better than importing all that oil.

  30. Thunder Sky is a very GOOD battery maker! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to pre order to get yout ThunderSky batteries.
      They are that good and inexpensive.
    I can not wait to see the prices after this business deal is up and running.
    Count me as a customer.

  31. VW Lupo - 3 liters per 100km by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently they develop a 2 liter small car.

  32. China "corrupt" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doubt there is much real corruption in China, otherwise they would not be able to produce extremely large numbers of devices and machines at low price, acceptable quality and on time. I would say the level of corruption in America is much higher than China, if you look at what the financial industry did with the American state recently. Lehman Brothers clearly was a criminal conspiracy to loot the state, but not a single person got jailed. America is on a direct route into the crapper while China is improving in any aspect, including healthcare, education and environmental protection, although from a much lower level.
    Now, who is more corrupt ??

    And no, I am German and I am not doing business with China whatsoever. I just don't believe in American jingoism.

  33. Destination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This project spells one thing - Environmental disaster.