Slashdot Mirror


The 'Cable Guy' Now a Network Specialist

Hugh Pickens writes "Amy Chozick reports that cable guys, long depicted as slovenly cranks who dodged growling dogs and tracked mud on the living room carpet, often have backgrounds in engineering and computer science and certifications in network engineering. 'Back in my day, you called the phone company, we hooked it up, gave you a phone book and left,' says Paul Holloway, a 30-year employee of Verizon, which offers phone, Internet, television and home monitoring services through its FiOS fiber optic network. 'These days people are connecting iPhones, Xboxes and 17 other devices in the home.' The surge in high-tech offerings comes at a critical time for cable companies in an increasingly saturated Internet-based market where growth must come from all the extras like high-speed Internet service, home security, digital recording devices and other high-tech upgrades. 'They should really change the name to Time Warner Internet,' says Quirino Madia, a supervisor for Time Warner Cable. 'Nine out of 10 times, that's all people care about.' Despite their enhanced stature and additional responsibilities, technicians haven't benefited much financially. The median hourly income in 2010 for telecommunications equipment installers and repairers was $55,600 annually, up only 0.4 percent from 2008."

235 comments

  1. Not comcast by bigtrike · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last time I had a comcast tech out to fix my cable modem, I had to show them how to use ping.

    1. Re:Not comcast by mrclisdue · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good work on your part.

      He showed up at my place shortly after, and I showed him how to use LOIC as a tool to check the comcast servers.

      Next time, I'll show him how to speed up his PC and search for Nigerian princes.

      cheers,

    2. Re:Not comcast by ibsteve2u · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next time, I'll show him how to speed up his PC and search for Nigerian princes.

      Cut the guy a break - and show him how to search for Nigerian princesses. It sounds like he'll be a "stay-at-home" spouse soon.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    3. Re:Not comcast by AngryDeuce · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, my experiences with Charter have been about the same over the last 10 years I've been a customer of theirs. The only time I ever had a tech that seemed like he knew anything (and didn't just try to bullshit me) was recently, and even then it took a problem being escalated to the supervisor's supervisor to get that kind of attention. Turns out the "shitty wiring in the walls that was preventing [me] from getting more than 4 meg that would never be repaired unless the landlord tore all the walls out and rewired the building" was actually a faulty node that was blasting everyone in this complex with so much noise on the lines that anything beyond regular web surfing didn't work for shit (and even that worked like crap during peak, which was always the excuse, "it's peak usage, sorry, nothing can be done". It took a year of complaints from everyone in this complex until they finally investigated and found the problem with the node and, when they replaced/repaired it, holy shit, everything started working again. Imagine that...

      If there was any other alternative that offered similar speeds, I would switch, but unfortunately my choice is them or DSL that tops out at 7 meg for the same price. Either way, their Level 3 guy openly admitted that most of the lower level techs know enough to plug the shit in and do basic troubleshooting, but that's about it. However, he did say that 99% of the time the problem is user error related to people not knowing how to plug the shit in or connect to the network, so maybe that's why? Either way, though, I could do without the bullshit answers. I've had the problems blamed on my router more often than I can count (even though that's complete bullshit), and funny, that always segues into trying to get me to rent one from them for $7 a month. Uh, yeah, no thanks...

    4. Re:Not comcast by laffer1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't generalize this. I've seen some bad Comcast installers, but some of they are quite with it. In fact, if you're dealing with the business division, those guys are quite good. One of the last guys I dealt with asked me why I had a business connection at home. We started talking and he was a big Linux fan. He thought it was rather cool I ran a BSD project out of my house. Even shared some insight on their IPV6 deployment plans with me.

    5. Re:Not comcast by interval1066 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ...I had to show them how to use ping.

      On the other end of the spectrum, needing to call technical support simply to get the ips of the name servers I needed to use elicited a salvo of "Can you ping the servers?" and "Can you give me the output of tracert?" Finally, after 15 minutes of explaining that I was using linux ("That platform isn't supported"), I could configure my machine myself, and all I needed was this one bit of information, the "tech" on the other end of the line actually seemed annoyed with having to give up the one piece of info I actually needed.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    6. Re:Not comcast by vlm · · Score: 0

      preventing [me] from getting more than 4 meg

      unfortunately my choice is them or DSL that tops out at 7 meg for the same price

      Hmm maybe you got the story crossed over but I'm not really seeing the problem here...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:Not comcast by vlm · · Score: 4, Informative

      the other end of the line actually seemed annoyed with having to give up the one piece of info I actually needed

      I don't think giving out DNS server IPs is in the script, and going off the script means that rep is going to be disciplined, and they had to exhaust the 15 minute script lest the rep get punished before being able to go off script, which also ruins the rep's required average call time which it probably something like 3 minutes. So you had them between a rock and a hard place, no matter what the rep did, once you called in, that rep is about to get disciplined, and no one likes no win scenarios.

      Which at least fits in well with the management strategy of keeping the turnover rate of line employees up to keep benefit costs down.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    8. Re:Not comcast by Garybaldy · · Score: 1

      I understood it to mean due to a network problem he was only getting 4meg that when fixed exceeded the 7meg offered from dsl.

    9. Re:Not comcast by Sevalecan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No joke. My dad has Charter out at his business, and his modem died not too long ago, so he called them up and they came out and replaced it. This new modem had three different ethernet ports on it, and what the charter guy did was plug the router into the second, non-operative port (he was only paying for one connection anyway), and then plugged his desktop directly into the first port on this new modem. He also told my dad that he needed a "business router" and that's why the router no longer worked. Business router my foot, all he needed was someone with a brain larger than a peanut to come in and hook it up for him. I unplugged the computer, plugged it back into the router, then plugged the router into the first port of the new modem and all was well. It's just a cheap little d-link router but it works fine, he doesn't need anything more and never did.

    10. Re:Not comcast by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I always use 8.8.8.8 (one of Google's DNS servers) as an emergency backup when I cannot reach mine.

      Also, a lot of linux distros do support DHCP, which is a good way to get the settings before manually configuring. (which may not be an option in your situation)

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    11. Re:Not comcast by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What I do:

      Them: Hello my name is $OBVIOUSLY_FAKE_NAME
      Me: $OBVIOUSLY_FAKE_NAME, is it? I know you have a script and all, but please save us both some time and just escalate me to a higher support tier, the info I need isn't on your script. (If they refuse, then I say: "Sorry about this, I know calls are recorded... so, I'm right pissed off and I'd like to talk to your manager!")

      Once I've got the next higher up support personnel on the phone I can usually say things like: "I need the IP list for my name servers, my IP is: xx.xx.xx.xx", or "Your cable-tech guy forgot to give me the admin password for the modem, what's the standard PW or reset procedure & web-based config?" and I'm off the phone in mere moments.

      IMHO, there's no need to ever mention what OS you're using. If they ask I tell them it's none of their business, they sell network service, not software.

    12. Re:Not comcast by jhoegl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So... its like any standard workplace... good workers and bad workers.

    13. Re:Not comcast by rhizome · · Score: 1

      Last time I had a comcast tech out to fix my cable modem, I had to show them how to use ping.

      I've got news for you: he knows how. He was just being lazy and padding his hours with a play-dumb work slowdown.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    14. Re:Not comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the thing, though. Comcast techs aren't paid by the hour, at least around here. They're paid per job. That's why usually, their motivation is to show up, half-ass their way through the issue as fast as possible, and get on to the next job.

    15. Re:Not comcast by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Sounds about like my local company (Shentel) too - we had outages 5 separate times in October, each time the idiots on the phone were convinced that something was wrong with our router or computers, how dare we insinuate that their equipment could POSSIBLY be broken.

      Finally after 5 calls, a 15-minute browbeating of one of their phone monkeys, and 3 dispatches....they futzed around for almost 3 hours and finally figured out that someone sliced a line putting in a privacy fence.

      And this after I had to talk to 3 separate people to actually get the provisioning right on our modem to get the speeds we were paying for.

    16. Re:Not comcast by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As a former tech support rep at a call center, I can absolutely vouch that the first people you talk to are going to be idiots reading off a card.
      I wish there was a menu option you could select in the phone tree system that says "I hereby declare myself to be competent in the topic at hand. I have tried the routine troubleshooting to no avail, and believe the problem lies beyond my control to fix. I agree to pay a $50 surcharge if you prove me wrong and I should have stuck with the regular support staff.

    17. Re:Not comcast by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Next time, after the third time you tell them what you want them to tell you, just demand to talk to their supervisor. The "supervisor" you get will probably just be a fellow employee who will give you the info. Barring that they will maybe be a tech lead who will give you the info. Either way you waste the time of an employee who costs more than minimum wage, and thus help to motivate a change.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Not comcast by RKBA · · Score: 1

      I once had a Charter installer tell me that I should have driven to their office and picked up the Charter Internet cable modem (the thing my router plugs into) and associated cables, connectors, etc., and installed things myself instead of taking advantage of their free installation. I just may do that next time, if for no other reason than to avoid dealing with Charter's A-hole installers.

    19. Re:Not comcast by ToiletBomber · · Score: 1

      Now that's very unusual... our most recent one knew all of the tricks... ping, checking for noise on the cables, checking for damage, all that stuff. Must be an outlier or something :P

    20. Re:Not comcast by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

      The first time I was auto-forwarded to an ISP-provided search page for a typo in a domain name I changed my DNS servers to 4.2.2.1, 4.2.2.2, and 4.2.2.3.
      What benefits do ISP-provided name servers provide?

      --
      I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
    21. Re:Not comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other end of the spectrum, needing to call technical support simply to get the ips of the name servers I needed to use elicited a salvo of "Can you ping the servers?" and "Can you give me the output of tracert?" Finally, after 15 minutes of explaining that I was using linux ("That platform isn't supported"), I could configure my machine myself, and all I needed was this one bit of information, the "tech" on the other end of the line actually seemed annoyed with having to give up the one piece of info I actually needed.

      Did you try saying "shibboleet"?

    22. Re:Not comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    23. Re:Not comcast by FoolishOwl · · Score: 2

      The last time I had a Comcast technician out, he was curious about the command-line tool I was using, mtr. At that point, we could actually talk like two technicians.

    24. Re:Not comcast by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Last time I had a comcast tech out to fix my cable modem, I had to show them how to use ping.

      Likely just a part time contractor.

      Real Comcast techs know how to pull up a terminal and run commands.

      I've had both.

    25. Re:Not comcast by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      No, it's a standard workplace, there are good workers in high returns business section and bad workers in low returns general public section.

    26. Re:Not comcast by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Sadly, reality is not a dream...

    27. Re:Not comcast by Macrat · · Score: 1

      What benefits do ISP-provided name servers provide?

      Slower lookups? :-)

    28. Re:Not comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When I was at the other end a customer called claiming he was some Network Specialist and he knew there was something wrong on our end.

      I asked him if he could prove I was an idiot by removing the second network card config he had configured. Things suddenly worked.

      So yes, there are idiots on both sides. I understand that a script is stoopid for most of us here, but for the majority of 'specialists' it isn't. I have seen people trying to solve an issue for 45+ minutes only to realize they did not do step 1 or step 2 in the script.

      If somebody asked for the IP adress of any server, we just gave it. We even explained telnet to POP3 for dial up customers who often received to large mails and MS cut of the connection.

      Sure it is annoying and you have checked everything. On the whole it however will save time. Not with you. It will with the 1000 other customers. The problem is not so much the usage of a script, but the script itself. If you get people who say "My mail does not work" the standard we did was to do a traceroute to see if there was a connection or a DNS problem. If that worked, we tried a telnet to see if there was no firewall issue.
      Only then did we check the mail program. This if the mail had worked previously.

      And if you are so smart and have a connection, why don't you look up the IP adresses in either your settings or on our website. Yes, you can find that without a valid DNS server. You are the specialist. You figure it out if you don't like the way we give support. Yes, I have hung up on customers as agent, supervisor AND manager because they started demanding I do things their way and refused to answer some extreme simple questions, like their login (so I can see if there is an issue with their account) or their basic network setting. They kept telling that there was an issue at our end without giving ANY feedback on how they reached that conclusion.

      I am there to give service. That does not mean I am your servant. And yes, we gave the best service at that time of any provider. When I compared with others, our 1st level support did what others did at second or even third level.

      So next time, just go with the flow and use your knowledge to find those adresses yourself with your knowledge. There is no reason to call them for the DNS addresses. None whatsoever unless you are not a specialist of any kind. Then please follow the script to see if you have not forgotten other configurations.

    29. Re:Not comcast by Valcrus · · Score: 0

      The reason it would never happen is every idiot that wasn't smart enough to tell that their computer wasn't on would still press that button going "I know what I'm doing". Its the same reason why so many large call centers make you go through the call tree for every service even if you just have internet, because if they gave you a number that was just for internet support everyone would use it as a shortcut even when their issue has nothing to do with internet. I do upper level internet support and while I do get people that know what they are talking about I also get probably 9 out of 10 that don't know what you talk about when you say computer. "Oh the big screen on my desk? The green light is flashing on it."

    30. Re:Not comcast by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      This. My best friend worked as an installer for Comcast for somewhere between 5 and 6 years. He is a smart guy, but more importantly he is always ready to learn more (and had no problem with getting his hand dirty). If some new piece of tech came down the line he was always the first guy to rush and learn more about it.

      His co-workers were like everywhere else, they ranged from eager to learn and to more to eager to get a check and go home. Underestimate no one.

    31. Re:Not comcast by Steauengeglase · · Score: 2

      "His co-workers were like all co-workers, they ranged from eager to learn, to eager to get a check and go home. Underestimate no one."

      Except my grammar and sentence structure, always underestimate that. :)

    32. Re:Not comcast by Terrasque · · Score: 3, Funny

      When I worked at a ISP call center, I suggested a seperate "pro" queue, where you'd have to answer for example some simple hex -> dec and subnetting questions.

      (Examples : What is the dec equivalent of 0x(FF|0A|10)? how many ip adresses are there in a /24 subnet?)

      For some reason the management didn't quite like the idea..

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    33. Re:Not comcast by haruchai · · Score: 1

      4.2.2.2 is one I've used for a long time ( provided by Level 3 ) although from .1 to .6 works as well. Here's the story behind it: http://www.tummy.com/Community/Articles/famous-dns-server/

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    34. Re:Not comcast by Soluzar · · Score: 1

      Sounds a lot like an ISP I dropped a few years back. Of course I want you to do things my way - I'm paying you some money every month. Along with an internet connetion, that's what I'm paying for. The company I get internet from now are always happy to listen to what I have to say and respond accordingly. They don't have scripts. At all.

    35. Re:Not comcast by ziggit · · Score: 0

      I know the feeling. Any time I've had a tech blame it on my router, I kindly point out that my router is successfully routing traffic between every other interface... And yet they still insist on walking me through basic troubleshooting steps. Eventually, I just flat out ask them to try reprovisioning the line instead of doubting the functionality of the devices on my end. 99% of the time that works.

    36. Re:Not comcast by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Huhn. Twice (long story) in the last year I have done Comcast self-installs without the least bit of problem. Except the second time, Comcast was having local issues causing modem desync issue...Oh, I'm sorry...Issues with my Buffalo/Tomato router that has worked perfectly for years. Yes, every time I would get thrown back to their self-install captive portal, they would tell me it was because of my router. Of course now I have a Scientific Atlanta modem that dogs out about every week, requiring a power cycle. Of course, both my router and I know how to release/renew DHCP leases, so I don't have to reboot the router like they say I HAVE to...

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    37. Re:Not comcast by adolf · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I've had variously slow response from 4.2.2.x, but at least it/they always works.

      Lately, I've been using Google's 8.8.8.8 with 4.2.2.1 as a secondary.

      Allegedly, this can piss off some CDN systems, but meh: The other option is my ISP's DNS, which is consistently both broken and laggy to such an extent that I cannot imagine how they've managed to fuck up BIND so thoroughly.

    38. Re:Not comcast by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh, the infamous and distressingly prevalant Lesser Terran Binder Monkey in it's native habitat. The only creature I know that I wish you could get an environmental impact study done against, rather than for.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    39. Re:Not comcast by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Once I've got the next higher up support personnel on the phone I can usually say things like: "I need the IP list for my name servers, my IP is: xx.xx.xx.xx", or "Your cable-tech guy forgot to give me the admin password for the modem, what's the standard PW or reset procedure & web-based config?" and I'm off the phone in mere moments.

      Call center reps have developed a strategy of dealing with such requests. Often, you'll be transferred to some other random rep who merely sees the note and claims to be a supervisor.

      I knew someone who was having issues and asked to speak with each successive rep's supervisor 8 times before getting someone who actually had access to some basic technically information. He thought he had gone 8 levels up the chain of command; I didn't have the heart to tell him he probably spoke with 7 different first-level tech support reps, before finally speaking to a single actual supervisor.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    40. Re:Not comcast by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      I only talked with my ISP's helpdesk once. They asked what my problem was, I asked for their DNS adresses so I could enter them manually (somehow DHCP mucked that up. I never took the time how to teach my router to give the correct DNS adresses). They gave it to me without questioning. Including waiting I don't think I was on the line for more than 5 minutes.
      But the USA doesn't have competition in ISP's, so a high class high price ISP like XS4ALL won't appear there.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    41. Re:Not comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but he wasn't getting the 7+ mb he was paying for in the first place so he could have just voted with his wallet and switched. My problem with DSL is they want you to enter a contract. This might vary by company but considering only one company offers cable and one offers DSL in my area there isn't much competition.

    42. Re:Not comcast by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Dont blame the technician. His desire is to learn and earn a living and obviously Comcast saw a future with this new person.

      For my part, I will not provide in-depth training to a new employee until I see that he/she should be kept and nurtured.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    43. Re:Not comcast by u38cg · · Score: 1

      In general, I suspect an unpublicised phone number direct to the second line would be adequate. Those who Google and find it are probably also bright enough to have checked that it is turned on, and so forth.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    44. Re:Not comcast by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine had cable+internet installed a few years ago (after years of free cable from the previous owner which didn't get turned off or billed for until Comcast discovered the oversight) and they sent out a crew to install the cable modem. From what I hear there were three guys standing around, scratching their heads, trying to figure out why the darn thing wouldn't work. After screwing around on his computer for a good hour or two, my buddy finally got frustrated and told them to go away and a friend (me) would set it up. I took a look, removed the USB cable they had used to plug the modem into the computer, ran a CAT5 from the modem to the computer, and voila! Instant internet!

      If cable installers are network engineers now, I'm not seeing it. Comcast still outsources a lot of its installs to smaller local companies in many areas, and they don't seem to be hiring particularly competent installers.

    45. Re:Not comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There might be no one using them so cached DNS queries could be much faster (what, 12ms instead of 25ms). Anything thats not cached requires them to look to the root nameserver anyway right? But I've found Verizons DNS (4.2.2.x) to be the fastest usually, responding at a median of 20ms or so. Googles (8.8.8.8) spike between 60-80ms.

    46. Re:Not comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, a lot of linux distros do support DHCP

      I would hope they all do. Which distros do not?

    47. Re:Not comcast by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      Hence the $50 surcharge if you aren't worthy to have skipped in line.

  2. And the last 3 times I had one at the house... by wygit · · Score: 2

    he had several meters and black boxes his employer had given him but hadn't shown him how to use. He was standing there clipping clips to different connectors, saying "Is this what I hook this to?"

    1. Re:And the last 3 times I had one at the house... by Mannfred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess what the article is really saying is that now the cable companies _need_ network specialists even at the customer-facing frontline, but they're not willing to pay for them.

    2. Re:And the last 3 times I had one at the house... by NJRoadfan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The cable companies around here seem to subcontract out all their install work, mostly to people who aren't good or care about their job. Verizon still has their own employees doing the Fios installs since they have to send someone up onto the pole to run the fiber from the tap into the house. The Verizon guys appear to be better trained and better paid (not surprising since they are unionized). $53k is peanuts on the coasts, but is a decent salary elsewhere in the US.

    3. Re:And the last 3 times I had one at the house... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's why I don't have cable for either TV or internet. The Centurylink guys seem to be quite a bit more clueful and the DirecTV technicians on the rare occasion where I need them go way above and beyond what I've needed to make sure things are done and that I won't have further problems.

    4. Re:And the last 3 times I had one at the house... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely. Not the cable companies are alone in their contempt for their customers. Lots of businesses now regard customer service an technical support as little more than a pain in the ass. Some even admit to crafting "the experience" such that customers will use it as seldom as possible. Apparently, cheap, untrained, English-as-a-third language help is getting harder to come by.

    5. Re:And the last 3 times I had one at the house... by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Funny

      way above and beyond what I've needed to make sure things are done and that I won't have further problems.

      So, what, they installed a weather control machine?

    6. Re:And the last 3 times I had one at the house... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      $53k is peanuts on the coasts, but is a decent salary elsewhere in the US.

      Yes, but the "coasts" make up the majority of the population in the US, so that's probably driving the high "median" income. "elsewhere in the US" I'd bet they're earning a similarly barely-livable salary.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  3. Networking Certs and CS Degree? by cluedweasel · · Score: 1

    "'These days people are connecting iPhones, Xboxes and 17 other devices in the home." Seriously? Certs and a degree are needed to hook up equipment to a home network?

    1. Re:Networking Certs and CS Degree? by Osgeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

      shows you how worthless those are, considering your partner may have just been hired cause he owned a truck and a hand drill

    2. Re:Networking Certs and CS Degree? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      The Geek Squad (Best Buy's version of computer technicians) charges $120 _per device_ to install a home network. Obviously, it must require advanced knowledge!

    3. Re:Networking Certs and CS Degree? by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      LOL. The Best Buy Geek (hah) Squad is kind of like the lottery. It's sole purpose is to separate the stupid from their money.

    4. Re:Networking Certs and CS Degree? by green1 · · Score: 1

      What the "cable guy" needs to know now... well, I'm not the "cable guy" I'm the "phone guy" but it's increasingly the same job.

      Hooking up equipment in the house is relatively simple... as long as all goes well. figuring out what went wrong and why isn't. Keep in mind that for a telecommunications technician, the network doesn't start in the house. The network starts at the CO, and runs on wiring often designed and installed before the internet existed, and that has been deteriorating in the elements for several decades. It then includes running wires through fully finished houses that were also built before the internet existed, and where the homeowners don't want to see any visible wiring when you're done. Which often includes creative wiring, or running high speed data signals on wiring that was never designed for it. And then connecting to it technology such as our TV service which simply doesn't tolerate any dropped packets, regardless of the weather outside. Additionally we've added in wireless technologies and all the inherent instability, interference, and spectrum management problems that are associated with it.

      I have completed a 2 year college diploma in Computer Engineering Technology, and a 4 year apprenticeship as a Telecommunications Technician. I've also had many months of in house training through my company, including fairly in depth knowledge of IP networking, multicast video streaming, ADSL Network transmission, fibre optics, satellite transmission, and more.

      I'm expected to install and repair phone, internet, and TV service running on copper, fibre optic, and satellite mediums, and connect to them a huge assortment of customer supplied equipment running any operating system and any software known to man, and it has to "just work" no matter what the end user has installed, tweaked, or clicked on that they shouldn't have, and generally when the customer has no idea of how their equipment works. The average home network these days is probably more complex than many office networks were 20 years ago, with everything from gaming systems, tablets, computers, phones, TVs, DVD players, SIP devices, and IPTV boxes connected through various technologies (ethernet on cat3, cat5, cat6, HPNA on phone lines, HCNA on coax, powerline adapters, and several wireless standards) And we have to figure it all out in the very short period of time we are in someone's house (an install is expected to take under 3 hours start to finish, and a repair under 2 hours)

      What usually separates the "good" technicians from the rest is the ability to figure out weird computer problems, and even weirder network transmission problems (most problems with our TV service are caused by lost packets, figuring out if that's from a bad connection (and where), interference on the wiring (and from what), an overloaded network (and why) etc can be a real challenge.)

  4. no it's lot of contractors who some times are pay by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    payed per job and are over scheduled leading to time where they don't even show time.

    And I have seen job listed where they just say if you have a truck and a list of tools you can start right away.

  5. Captain Obvious strikes again.... by girlintraining · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    This just in:

    Cable companies screw their employees just as much as their customers. Stay tuned while we go deep undercover into the world of cable company management and ask the really tough question why can they charge so much for a shit product? We'll get into that and more after the following commercials showing dancing toilet paper, talking animals, cars driving in the rain, and finally... angry white men trying to get elected. STAY TUNED!

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Captain Obvious strikes again.... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Correction, companies screw their employees as much as their customers (tho the preferred word there is consumers, moo)...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:Captain Obvious strikes again.... by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 0

      Screw their employees? 50+ grand median for plugging a few things in and clicking a few buttons on an electronic form is getting screwed?

  6. Hourly income was $55,600 annually! by seyyah · · Score: 2

    The median hourly income in 2010 for telecommunications equipment installers and repairers was $55,600 annually, up only 0.4 percent from 2008."

    Terrific start to the year with that sentence!

    1. Re:Hourly income was $55,600 annually! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The median hourly income in 2010 for telecommunications equipment installers and repairers was $55,600 annually, up only 0.4 percent from 2008."

      Terrific start to the year with that sentence!

      Yes, they must be really hurting. I mean everyone makes 6 figures, right? right?

    2. Re:Hourly income was $55,600 annually! by Lorens · · Score: 3, Funny

      I want an hourly income of $55,600 too. I don't understand why they only work one hour a year, in their place I'd work a whole day!

    3. Re:Hourly income was $55,600 annually! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The median hourly income in 2010 for telecommunications equipment installers and repairers was $55,600 annually, up only 0.4 percent from 2008."

      Terrific start to the year with that sentence!

      In at least two homes, seems the party never stopped...

    4. Re:Hourly income was $55,600 annually! by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      lollll...I hear you. Before I read that, I thought the only place you could make that much an hour was by pilfering 401Ks on Wall Street.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    5. Re:Hourly income was $55,600 annually! by vlm · · Score: 1

      Means they're not playing games and pretending a non-manager is an exempt manager therefore exempt, a popular activity in the IT world.
      Hourly at 55600 means you get $41.70/hour for working overtime (storm repair work, high workload, etc), whereas salaried at 55600 means you get laughed at on /. for working uncompensated overtime.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:Hourly income was $55,600 annually! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          In 2008, Zimbabwe was considering making minimum wage $100 Billion. Of course, their dollar wasn't worth quite the same as the USD.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  7. Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A UK cable company now part of Virgin Media called itself "Telewest Broadband" to promote its internet service instead of their TV and phone offerings.

  8. But when you ask for a cable card they don't know by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    A lot of the time when you want stuff like that they don't know much about them and with the pc's they want to install that POS software on them. Also comcast give out the POS Norton AV as well.

  9. Hmm.... not so sure about this .... by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know that the cable providers are really trying to get "Network Specialists" to do the installs? I completely agree that times are changing, and today's installer is much more likely to be bringing the connection into a home for Internet service than for simply watching TV. But the median pay doesn't sound that out of line to me, for what I think they're really looking for -- which is someone capable of efficiently driving to customer locations and following some defined procedures to hook up the cable and attach the required equipment.

    The real "Network Specialists" they'd pay a lot more for would be the guys working at the "back end" of the cable company, managing the large switches handling all the traffic going out to various neighborhoods and ensuring people aren't hacking a modem in some way to get more bandwidth than they paid for. Other back end workers would be responsible for such things as rolling out firmware upgrades to the cable modems or set-top boxes on their network, testing equipment that comes back in as defective or customer returns, and keeping on top of network outages.

    Just because today's customer is more sophisticated and wants to attach 15 or 20 devices to their connection doesn't mean the INSTALLER is expected to assist with any of that. My personal experience with cable company troubleshooting of issues (such as intermittent connections) tells me that if anything, they'll ask you to disconnect the cable modem from everything else and troubleshoot with only one PC connected directly to it. They don't really understand, or WANT to understand all the other things you might be trying to do with it.

    1. Re:Hmm.... not so sure about this .... by GaryOlson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because today's customer is more sophisticated...

      Just because today's customer THINKS they are more sophisticated because multiple devices can be easily connected to a home network as a result of standards and effective design created by hardworking engineers.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    2. Re:Hmm.... not so sure about this .... by shentino · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they know that too much advanced stuff is technically against their TOS so if you're not a good little bit sipper you really ought to upgrade to business class.

    3. Re:Hmm.... not so sure about this .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Connecting various devices to a home router isn't exactly in the realm of "network specialist". It's maybe a half-day course to learn how to do it? Or a zero-hour course for anyone with even an inkling of interest in technology, since they will have already done this dozens of times for themselves (and family, and friends...).

      This isn't brain surgery here. I'm not saying that these techs aren't having to take on new responsibilities. I'm just saying that ~55k$ seems plenty for what the on-site installer is being asked to do.

    4. Re:Hmm.... not so sure about this .... by mkraft · · Score: 1

      There are a number of levels inside cable companies when it comes to support.

      The lowest level is the "cable guy". This person is not likely to have a computer or engineering background. They receive training from the cable company to do basic things like use the diagnostic meter, run coax cable, strip wiring, etc. basically they are kind of like basic electricians. Some may have some training as to what QAM errors are and the like, but not enough to fix problems. Some are employees of the cable company (more likely for trouble calls) and some are contractors (more likely for installs).

      Next up the line are the "line techs". These are the guys in the trucks with cherry pickers. The customer rarely deals with them. They are trained in diagnosing line and node problems to find errors in the signals (leaks, interference, etc). Likely they have an electrical engineering background. When there's an "outage" (TV, Internet and/or phone), these are the guys who are deployed.

      Lastly, there's the people who manage the headend and servers. These are ghosts, you'll never see them. These are the ones with computer and engineering backgrounds, the ones you could call network specialists. Customers never deal with them directly.

      So basically the "cable guy" is still the "cable guy".

    5. Re:Hmm.... not so sure about this .... by swalve · · Score: 2

      My experience with Comcast is that they have various levels of technician. The people who do the installs are the first line. But they also have line (RF) techs and data techs who handle the infrastructure. Those guys are the ones who are rarely going to show up at your house, but actually know how to get stuff done.

    6. Re:Hmm.... not so sure about this .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many cable providers are providing minimal training to new employees as long as they have a valid drivers licence in order to save dollars with only a supervisor having an education and possibly prior experience possibly in networking , which is why they have to phone the company alot of the time . sales professionals usually are given a bit of training and run scripts which require little knowledge .Gone are the days where you called for a networking issue and actually got someone who went to school for that at the first tier. it is not until higher tiers that they get someone with an education or extensive experience .A couple of fios courses or fios being part of a course is not exactly what this is stating I would disagree with the article and change it to sometimes, not state often .they might have a certificate for fibre optic which can be as little as part of a 5 cr course to as much as a couple of very short courses but certainly not a diploma or degree . I suggest they check out who is getting hired by looking at adverts across the board.

    7. Re:Hmm.... not so sure about this .... by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      Just because today's customer is more sophisticated...

      Just because today's customer THINKS they are more sophisticated because multiple devices can be easily connected to a home network as a result of standards and effective design created by hardworking engineers.

      Just because today's customer NEEDS to be more sophisticated because hardware and software engineers don't follow the standards exactly, add in useless vendor lock-in bells and whistles such as "WIFI Speed Boost", and don't release the driver software so that we can actually USE the hardware on OSs (like Linux or Windows7) out of the box, because of the slave drivers the engineers work for don't get bonuses if they don't meet bogus deadlines the hardworking engineers thought were ridiculous in the first place.

    8. Re:Hmm.... not so sure about this .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I saw one of them once. He was a pretty awesome tech, and knew what the hell he was talking about. Basically the first tech just came out, looked at our install, and verified that it was okay. He metered it and everything to make sure that it worked. After about a week, our cable modem started dropping 1/4 to 1/2 the packets(tested with ping). We called, and Comcast sent that technician back out, who proceeded to say that everything looked fine and it was probably our cable modem. Needless to say, the new modem they gave us also started dropping packets like mad.

      We called Comcast again, and they sent out a line technician, who got into our attic and started doing signal quality testing with the cable line in our house, after he verified that the other tech did everything right. He determined that the line inside our house was good, but that the line between our house and the curb was RG-59 and that it needed to be restrung with RG-6 to avoid the signal loss problem we were having. He did that, and fixed the problem.

      So yes, OP's statement is accurate, and their line techs don't appear until they've exhausted the toolkit of the level 1 tech, because their typical customer base tends to fuck things up after the installer has left.

    9. Re:Hmm.... not so sure about this .... by gottspeed · · Score: 1

      As an electrician, I can tell you a cable installer isn't a "Basic Electrician". There is far more to my broad occupation than stripping and sizing wire and making terminations. For the successful ones anyway. In my neck of the woods the upper echelons of the cable co are continually calling my outfit going "Why are our installs blowing up plasma TV's?, we keep settling these damage claims and it sucks!" Well, when an entire house tries to ground through the cable jack...

    10. Re:Hmm.... not so sure about this .... by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      I agree that they are not a "Basic Electrician". I would argue though that they are a strict subset of an electrician. Any decent electrician should be able to run coax, or Cat 5 cable without much difficulty (assuming they have the tools, and have had even 5 minutes of instruction on crimping coax ends, etc).

      That said even a very successful "cable guy" could not be expected to do much of the diagnostic and design work that an electrician does on a daily basis.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  10. The 'Cable Guy' Now a Network Specialist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah. This'll be true when they do more than hook up a Belkin shit200 to their shitty modem. In order to be a "network specialist", you have to actually hook up a real network not install a fucking gateway and call it a day. They are installers. Period. They don't build networks. When they can claim that, they can claim an arbitrarily fancy sounding title.

  11. Time Warner Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could be catchier. How about America Online?

  12. network specialist by l3v1 · · Score: 2

    Network specialists? My a$$. They are no more network specialists than bloggers are professional journalists (yes, I feel your pain and anger and feel free to think yourselves to be anything you want, which won't change a thing).

    If you want to be sure that the work is done right, try to do as much of the local installations yourselves as possible. Otherwise you're in for a treat: lot of wasted time plus paying for stuff you end up doing yourselves anyway.

    And no disrespect, but calling an average of >50k for cable installing low... come on, be at least a bit realistic.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:network specialist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny comment about journalists and bloggerts. I would say the best investigative work for the past 2 yr has been by your amateurs. This is independent from the fact that mainstream (cut throat capitalist) journalism is a failure. Mainstream journalism is an abject failure. Fuck your professionals.

    2. Re:network specialist by NewWorldDan · · Score: 1

      The guys making > $50k are not the guys comming to your house hooking up the cable. They're the guys hooking up and dealing with the CO equipment and other pieces of provider side equipment. The guys coming to your house are typically classified as low-voltage cabling installers. In most states, they don't need a license for that. In any event, I haven't had a phone/cable guy come inside my house in over a decade. There's just no need for that.

    3. Re:network specialist by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Network specialists? My a$$. They are no more network specialists than bloggers are professional journalists (yes, I feel your pain and anger and feel free to think yourselves to be anything you want, which won't change a thing).

      A blogger is a professional journalist if they're making their living at it. It makes no difference how trivial the material they cover is, it's a matter of definition.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:network specialist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A network specialist lives in my a$$ you insensetive clod!!

    5. Re:network specialist by F69631 · · Score: 1

      A blogger is a professional journalist if they're making their living at it. It makes no difference how trivial the material they cover is, it's a matter of definition.

      Blogger is not a synonym for journalist. Thus, a blogger is a professional blogger if they're making their living at it. They might or might not also be journalists, depending which definition of the word you use: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/journalism.

      Personally, I prefer this one: "writing characterized by a direct presentation of facts or description of events without an attempt at interpretation", which means that a subset of people who write blogs are journalist, just like a subset of people who work at news organizations are journalists. By some of the definitions, essentially all bloggers are journalists, by other definitions none of them are. (Unless you argue that blog is a ((And not just equivalent to)) newspaper or magazine. I won't go there.)

    6. Re:network specialist by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Personally, I prefer this one: "writing characterized by a direct presentation of facts or description of events without an attempt at interpretation",

      But that doesn't mean you get to just ignore the one that directly contradicts you, "writing designed to appeal to current popular taste or public interest" unless you want people to think you're a complete asshole.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:network specialist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no. That would make them a professional blogger... There is a difference.

    8. Re:network specialist by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      And dont for get this probably includes a large number of higher level telco engineers who probaly bump up the average.

    9. Re:network specialist by evilviper · · Score: 1

      A blogger is a professional journalist if they're making their living at it.

      No, actually they're a professional blogger if they're making money off of it. "Journalist" has more serious connotations associated with it.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:network specialist by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, actually they're a professional blogger if they're making money off of it. "Journalist" has more serious connotations associated with it.

      HAHAHAHAHA serious connotations HAHAHAHAHA

      Seriously, Jayson Blair? Or how about all the retractions the NYT turns down even though they published an article that was utter bullshit? William Randolph Hearst ring a bell? There is no justification for your belief whatsoever. Maybe you should stop listening to right-wing think tanks like Pew that say there's a difference between journalists and bloggers because frankly, there ain't one. Today, an article submitted to a print publication is as likely to be accepted for their web-only media. When there was a difference between newspapers and blogs, you might have had a point. But it would have been flawed then, too, because all it means when you're talking about a paper is that there's more opportunities for abuse, because more people will believe it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:network specialist by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Really? All you've got are non-sequitors about media outlets not being absolutely perfect?

      Hey, clearly there's no difference between anyone with a license and a professional driver, because pro drivers have accidents, too. Wonderful logic there.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:network specialist by lsatenstein · · Score: 2

      I am in a snow belt, We get 25F or -20C easily for 6-8 weeks on end. The installer has to climb the pole, try to work with gloves, and work with sheathed wire that if flexed quickly, has the insulation break.
      Then he comes into the house to warm his hands, void his bladder, and use the rugged test equipment that his employer provided. In summer, there is the sweltering heat and the boxes on the poles with covers too sunbaked to touch.

      These guys earn their money. They are given x jobs per day, and usually then complete them with some spare time. But when difficulties arise, these guys put out, as there is no unjustified carry-over of work from one day to the next.

      So yes, climbing ladders, working in rain, cold, sweltering heat, and going into below ground pits and dealing with grumpy customers is what that salary covers.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  13. Re:But when you ask for a cable card they don't kn by Osgeld · · Score: 2

    I give them a sacrificial computer

    "oh yea I totally use that 850MHz Pentium 3 as my daily computer, it meets all of your minimum requirements"

  14. traditional phone guys used to be knowledgeable by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    It does depend on how far back you go. I can believe that phone guys in the 80s didn't do a lot, but if you go further back, they tended to be at least moderately knowledgeable electricians, since a lot of phone issues ended up being something with the wiring.

    1. Re:traditional phone guys used to be knowledgeable by swb · · Score: 1

      I think the old-school Bell System technicians had a couple of advantages over the Comcast guys.

      One, was the "Bell System" -- they were working with a completely designed vertical infrastructure. There was no mystery equipment, bought at the lowest price, from a Taiwanese manufacturer. And for many installs there wasn't much to do besides check cross-connects, make a few test calls with a butt set and ensure that the phone placed was the correct color for the homemaker's interior and the dial label had the right phone number. The harder installs were multiline extensions at small businesses.

      Two, was the union, which made the job decent paying, with reasonable work rules. This attracted better quality people to the job and probably did divert some technically minded guys that might have otherwise become electricians (or who WERE electricians) or other decent paying trade union jobs.

      Three, was being part of a state-sanctioned monopoly with a small, but legislatively guaranteed profit margin. This meant the company could create training programs and provide tools and so forth and not care about the money they spent since they could count on CWA and/or IBEW backing when they went to the government for a rate increase.

      I've had good experiences with Comcast technicians, but I haven't asked much of them. Most of them seem to be blue-collar kids with weak high school educations and pink collar aspirations of some kind of computer technician career. They've usually been nice, made their equipment work and even fixed a couple of my DIY coax issues with improved splitters.

    2. Re:traditional phone guys used to be knowledgeable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post reinforces my position that properly regulated monopolies (such as utilities) are not only viable over the long term, but preferable. However, the "properly" part is a problem.

  15. fluff don't read by vlm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    installed a “wireless gateway,” transforming an unused stairwell into a control room for the modem and router that can handle at least 24 devices at 22 megabits per second.

    Anybody in this business more than 5 minutes, already knows you don't need an unused stairwell to hold a little apple airport. Unused Barbie Dollhouse stairwell, then I'll be impressed. My unused stairwell has a fileserver psuedo-nas, a small 3 unit compute cluster, a vlan capable ether switch with a zillion ports, a sbc6120 pdp-8 clone with an ethernet to serial telnet converter box, one of my ipphones that connects to the house asterisk ip pbx, and yes, I wedged an apple time machine box in there as a wireless gateway too.

    Also not sure about the marketing figure of 24 devices. A /28 for the customer and a /29 for the public guest network? Uh, not. Probably just pulled than number out of a completely meaningless nether region.

    Another rant is you don't need certifications in network engineering such as my long expired CCNP to ... crimp a F-connector on a cable, or yank cat-5 thru a wall. I think this is one of those ever so trendy and tiresome "be glad you networking guys at least have some kind of job, because physicists and aerospace engineers are stuck driving taxis" story. Its very much like implying that you "Need" a french literature degree to be a mcdonalds fry cook because that seems to be the only job position hiring french lit grads now a days. You need the overtraining and overeducation due to intense competition and lack of jobs, not because the workload requires it.

    Finally, $55K is for a national job not just flyover big cities on the coasts. In the semi-rural area where I live, three times that gets you basically my house, a nice landed estate, an upgraded non-mcmansion house, an acre or so to grow gardens or have the kids play or put up a ham radio antenna in a non-HOA neighborhood, more or less low crime, decent neighbors, great four season weather, tons of money left over for kids education, travel/vacations, excellent local schools, tech toys, gourmet food, etc. Two spouses income and if you want you can live a rather more elaborate lifestyle, like perhaps own a house on a lakeshore, or substantial land for a private hunting reserve, etc. So spare me the comments that $55K in the flyover coastal areas or Chicago means living in a cardboard box and eating mac n cheese in the park; we know that. I know that TW pay has at least a small correction factor for local cost of living. The difference in salary required for "the good life" varies across the US by darn near a factor of 10, so if you can get a mid paying job in a fantastic area, its pretty good indeed.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:fluff don't read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know a guy who about 10 years ago bought a house for 18k. Yes 18k. He somehow talked the bank into giving him a 30 year mortgage on that. His 'house payment' as it were was about 20 bucks a month. He lived in a *small* ass town. It took him 2 hours to get to work. He didnt make much more than 50k. He lived *good* on that. You could literally walk across the town in 20 mins.

      Some people seem to think where they live now is *the best place ever*. No it is just what you can afford right now. In many 100-200k sized towns you can within 5 miles live in a trailer park to a very respectable mansion. It is just a matter of what you are willing to pay for. The day of the mcmansion is over. Now back to reality...

      If 55k was the only income for that family I would say you want to live in something 100k and down. Probably drive a 4-10 year old used car (or two). Its not great but hey thats middle class.. You dont get everything you want... Remember you own your stuff and do not let it own you.

    2. Re:fluff don't read by thejaq · · Score: 1

      Lots of houses in minneapolis for $50K 10 yr ago and today. You can comfortably afford that on 8-9$/hr.

    3. Re:fluff don't read by splorp! · · Score: 1

      He must have put a ton of money down. A 30 year fixed rate (ten years ago that ran around 6.875%) for an $18,000 house with 20% down gives a payment of $113.35. No idea where you're getting $20. This doesn't include property tax or insurance, either. Also, must have been a very small bank, since almost all of the big banks required at least a $50,000 loan for the better rates. For $14,400 (18k - 20%), they likely would add 3/8 to 5/8 to the rate.

      --
      Please don't humanize the morons around me. It makes me very uncomfortable.
    4. Re:fluff don't read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Need" a french literature degree to be a mcdonalds fry cook because that seems to be the only job position hiring french lit grads

      You haven't read french cooking encyclopedias and instruction books....

    5. Re:fluff don't read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...unused stairwell...

      My question is: who's building all these stairwells then neglecting to put some STAIRS in them?

    6. Re:fluff don't read by dingram17 · · Score: 1

      Another rant is you don't need certifications in network engineering such as my long expired CCNP to ... crimp a F-connector on a cable, or yank cat-5 thru a wall.

      In Australia you do. :-( Permanent cabling requires a cabling licence recognised by the Australian Communications and Media Authority. No you can't just do the test and show that you know how to crimp cable, or what the spacing from AC wiring is. You have to do the courses, pass the tests and then do 6-12 months work under the supervision of a cabler. Having a degree in communications engineering doesn't exempt you. http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=IND_TECH_TEL_CABLE

      Most technically inclined people do their own wiring, or if they are brutally scrupulous they use wireless, PLC, or leave the Cat5 draped around the walls.

      Australia over regulates things. The Queensland Government puts out a brochure warning you of the dangers of DIY electrical work and has mandatory signs that have to go up in shops selling power sockets and light switches. The New Zealand Government puts out a booklet on how to do your own wiring safely. Queensland and New Zealand use the SAME electrical wiring rules (AS/NZS 3000).

      My Dad had two power sockets that didn't work last week. He was able to clean the ants out of the wall, spend $10 on two new sockets and fit them himself. It would cost me about $150 to do the same here.

    7. Re:fluff don't read by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      uh, they're talking about the space under the staircase

      might be a good spot if you're trying to get signal to an upper/lower floor

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  16. Other Way Around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cable television is an extra to Internet service. That they still think otherwise just shows how out of touch they are.

  17. You use the word specialist by houghi · · Score: 1

    But I don't think it means what you think it means.

    The last time I had a cable Internet connection to be installed, I had ordered it without a network card, so I was sure that they would not give me a Windows Only one. I clearly had this on the application. I also installed Windows, because I knew it would not go well otherwise.

    So I have a clean Windows installation with on a paper the MAC address that they will need to make the connection. The first guy comes in and no connection. Well obviously, because he is using the wrong MAC address. I explain this to him, so he tells me that for this they need to send an engineer by.

    The engineer comes and I tell him the problem AND the solution. He seems not to believe me and looks around in various network settings. After 20 minutes (!) he calls in to his HQ and tells them the MAC address I already had for him.

    All I wanted to have a working connection. The moment he left I called in, told them I had a new MAC address and gave them the MAC my router has. This was not possible as the account was allowed only one device.

    So if they are really specialists, the first guy could have done the call with the MAC address, seen it working and save their company a lot of money.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:You use the word specialist by vlm · · Score: 1

      Geeze, they lock it down to MAC address? What if you get a new PC? They can tell (or predict with some accuracy) if its a LAN card or a dedicated device via the "OUI" organizationally unique identifier portion of the MAC addrs, so their software will likely not fall for you telling them your apple airport is actually your new PC. They might fall for you telling them its your new mac mini, maybe.

      What will work is installing a second NIC on the machine, installing debian linux or whatever, configure the new nic on your lan, set up a bit of iptables nat, and away you go. This pretty accurately describes my home setup for over a decade now (with newer lower power machines periodically installed, of course)

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:You use the word specialist by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Glad to have comcast... the modem just gives uses DHCP and locks to the first MAC address that connects... and if you get a new computer, turn the modem off and back on. (or wait an hour for the lock to time out)

    3. Re:You use the word specialist by swalve · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not sure what the point of the MAC lock is anymore, except maybe to circumvent people hooking a hub up to the ethernet out of the modem and trying to get IP addresses directly from the modem. But with the Comcast stuff, I've found that a couple of reboots always solves the problem.

    4. Re:You use the word specialist by houghi · · Score: 1

      If you get a new PC you have to call in. If you have two PCs they want to sell you a more expensive account type.

      Easy to work around. They counted on the majority of people not knowing this. Basic ISP theft I would say.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:You use the word specialist by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Most are like that. It's part of the DOCSIS standard, I think.

    6. Re:You use the word specialist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just attach their modem to *your* router? Then they only see your router.

      Why would you ever consider using their modem to connect directly to your computer? Their router should be outside your personal firewall.

    7. Re:You use the word specialist by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      Frankly, that's disgusting. I pay you for a dumb pipe. Mind your own damn business.

  18. "Specialist"? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    My foot. Sure, there are a few that know what they are doing and should be doing something more advanced ( and get paid for it ), but most that i have ever dealt with are buffoons and should be picking up trash instead.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  19. Theory based Degree can get killed in the cable by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    Install cable systems is very hands on and lack of skills can you or others killed. Some of what cable guys do is like electricians and I want some who knows what they are doing not some one with just certs or Degrees. THIS IS LEARN ON THE JOB JOB! that should need a min of a degree to get in.

    http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/106756

    Just look at the story's where a cable guy grounds to a GAS LINE and other stuff.

    http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/79994 Botched Comcast Install Blows Up House
    Investigators believe grounding rod punctured gas line

    http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r25415431-Comcast-fried-my-new-Sony-52q-lcd-tv

    http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/80151

    http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/80368 both technicians stated that the company-installed "system" of cables on the roof were "a real mess" and were unsafely stretched over and near an electrical box and associated cables."

    1. Re:Theory based Degree can get killed in the cable by vlm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Last decade I worked for a cableco and we had the opportunity of free training from this place called Jones/NCTI basically a paper binder self paced training system, fax in your chapter test answers, then study the next chapter, repeat. I took a couple classes for the heck of it (although it had nothing to do with my job, we had what amounted to a free site license, where any employee could sign up and it was rubber stamp approved). The frontline techs were required to take these classes, engineering staff not required. The classes were pretty good and basically explain in great detail very clearly (modern high school level, old middle school level) more or less how not to end up in a link from Joe_Dragon on /.

      Simple individual case incompetence, is probably much more likely than company wide lack of training.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  20. Professionalish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Professionalish titles will only cause people to demand professional quality 110% of the the time. But hey, here on SD all PR is good PR right?

  21. should not need a degree by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1
    1. Re:should not need a degree by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          It's always nice to blame someone else. Blame the cable company for a lightning strike? Why stop there? Lets get 'em for the next hurricane.

          My front porch light burnt out after the pizza delivery guy came yesterday. Can I blame him too?

          Or, there's a little something people keep saying here about correlation and causation. I'm sure they'll chime in soon.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:should not need a degree by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      or maybe you could read the article before saying it's BS and realise the modem wasn't grounded due to a shitty install job.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    3. Re:should not need a degree by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

      Maybe you should consider what the cable company does...

      The home is typically pre-wired. They are not responsible for the testing or verification of all wiring in the home. The attach their cable to the home wiring, which should already be properly grounded, and put their cable modem in, which attaches to the residential wired coax and residential wired power. It is not required or expected, of a technician installing a cable modem, to review the residence for proper grounding. It most likely states in the contract or terms of service, that you should have an electrician evaluate your electrical system, and provide a ground as necessary.

      I did find a number of other forum posts, where people were complaining that Comcast *wouldn't* install service, because they did *not* have a proper ground. They instructed the customer to contact an electrician or the power company, to install a grounding rod.

      When having T1's installed, I've had the providers show me where the "good earth ground" is for them to use, and sign off on the fact that if any equipment is damaged because the ground is not actually a "good earth ground", that I am responsible for any damaged equipment. We had to comply with other requirements also, such as 3/4" thick polyurethane coated plywood board mounted to the wall, for them to install their equipment to, dedicated power circuits, UPS, etc.

      We have insufficient information to have an educated opinion. Maybe it was grounded. Maybe it was grounded at the pole. If the house is pre-wired, it should be assumed that it is properly grounded inside.

      We do know that lightning does not always follow the shortest path to ground. It can. If you've ever seen high speed photography of a lightning strike, it's not a single arc from point A to B. Even still, there is a huge electrical/static charge and EMP related to, but not directly resulting from, such a discharge.

      I live in the "lightning capital of the US". We are very aware of lightning strikes and their results. Anyone who has lived here long has seen what can (and does) happen, even in perfectly grounded environments. If you suffer a direct strike, virtually anything connected to wires, no matter how well grounded and surge protected, can be damaged. It is very common for people to disconnect all of their valuable electronics during a storm. Physically disconnecting them from their sources, not just turning off a switch. Lightning that just went miles through the air will easily jump a fraction of an inch in a switch.

      I've seen computers that were turned off, attached to surge protectors that were turned off, where the switch, fuse, and internal components of the surge protector were melted. Heavier electrical devices tend to handle it better, but I've even see those with holes burned in the sides of their casing, where the lightning jumped from them to another piece of metal.

      We had several computers damaged in one office, because the telephone and network cables ran under the floor. The building was an older one, with a crawlspace under it. There was a nearby (but not direct) lightning strike, which caused a static charge under the building. Several seemingly unrelated computers and telephones, were damaged or destroyed. Two cables were rendered unusable, as several conductors were broken due to the strike (probably melted). Being under the building, and not touching the ground, weren't enough to protect them.

      If we were provided detailed schematics and photographs of the wiring, including grounding, for anything conductive (power, telephone, cable, plumbing, TV antenna mast, satellite dish, etc), we could make an educated opinion to what happened. For all I know, the lightning struck the roof of the house, hitting the main power lines coming it. it then could have traveled through the electrical system, and back out the c

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  22. I make it simple on 'em... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 2

    While I have a "good" (but small) cable company (right down to putting paper booties on when they enter the house), when I have a line problem and they talk about coming out, I always disconnect all of my other other routers and subnets and pipe the cable modem to one dedicated dumb little PC.

    Habit formed from experience with a "bad" (but huge) cable company that would always blame the problem on my equipment if there was more than one wire between their modem and the PC.

    If the big cable companies have gotten better at all, I would point the finger at their having better test equipment - equipment that obviates the need for knowledge.

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    1. Re:I make it simple on 'em... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have go as far as making my own locked box Point of Entry for the Cable, DirectTV and Phone companies. Anything inside my house was done by me/contractors ahead of time. So when I switch from Cable to Satellite, then back to Cable, the installer "or New bullshit Network Engineer", only has one place on my property to go and complete his required duty. (I am one of those assholes who works hard to keep introductory rates of services, so I switch when the price jumps. I personally hate the fact, for these past 15+ years, our internet services have never, seriously improved, without a hefty price tag to offer the customer for added benefits the customer never receives.)

      In San Antonio, we have Grande, Time Warner, AT&T, DirectTV, Dish, HughsNET, and pretty much all the cellular companies. I have gone through pretty much all of them throughout the beginning of dialup, ISDN, ADSL/DOCSIS Cable. In the beginning the amount of new runs that would be done because one company would tell me the RG-6 Coax cables used by Satellite were inferior to the TWC's version. From every excuse in the book to say something was wrong with how the previous communications connection had to be changed, or a new run performed.

      Finally after 3 years of switching between companies I was fed up with their bullshit installation problems. I Visio'd a wiring/networking layout for my house, eliminated most existing coax jacks. Designated a network patch panel to centralize all coax, Ethernet, telephone jacks to the one central box. Then ran a direct feed line to the Southwest end of my place for Satellite use, and a front yard access for the Cable/telephone company. Whenever I change services, I prepare ahead of time the disconnects for whichever services. Plus having the whole house wired cat5e, to a central patch panel & 24 port gigabit switch REALLY simplifies matters for me.

      Still having such a organized and expensive network setup at home. I still get installers who are "Network Professionals" now, completely baffled as to WTF I have setup at home. One Time Warner installer was insistent that he HAD to run a new coax line direct from outside so he could install Road Runner services. I showed him the door that minute, and gave him a lesson in Information Technology concepts.

      When work was hard up, I applied to work as a Installer, Repair/Tech, and I was given the boot for not having a truck, or various past working experiences in "actual telecommunications", forget the fact, Network Administrators who maintained 50,000+ computers throughout various large buildings, a network admin may already have the experience, training, and knowledge to wire-up a 4 bedroom home.

      But whatever these cable companies only want to make the consumer feel like the people that come to install these 'essential' services, are in fact Professionals.

      Between the Management and the Unions of these companies, We probably will never see actual IT Professionals working as Installers or Repairers. I happen to associate with AT&T Communications and U-Verse installers/repairers, and the opposite of the spectrum Time Warner Business installers, and various contractors that do Cable and Satellite installs. None of these guys are anywhere familiar with turning on a Computer let alone being able to troubleshoot simple network problems that result in, having the Modem release and renew a IP address due to a changed router or PC connection. Some of these guys have learned throughout the years proper networking techniques and troubleshooting skills. But their employers Prohibit their level of involvement with a customers computer. (rightfully so, because as a computer repair guy, sometimes a problem the customer is having, is due to the users ignorance of their own devices. Or the of age teen in the house has infected the whole household with malware/virus issues trying to use the latest P2P methods.

      I find it also a bad step in

    2. Re:I make it simple on 'em... by green1 · · Score: 1

      Problem is, YOUR setup may be perfect, but you can bet that for the technician that out of the last 50 setups he looked at, at least 40 of them turned out to be a problem in the customer's equipment.

      The catch phrase among the technicians is "the closer you get to the customer, the closer you get to the problem" (amazingly enough, that's not entirely a slight against the customers, the equipment and wiring also tends to get less reliable the further away from the central office you get as the wire gauges get thinner and the equipment gets cheaper and less heavily monitored)

      Thing is, a good technician will never blame "your equipment" they'll blame a specific piece of it after they figure out exactly what is causing the problem. I have many times figured out which virus-ridden computer is the problem, or which damaged patch cord, or which computer plugged in to a phone jack, etc.

      Customers are often offended when I start my testing from inside their house, but I'll be damned if I'm going to start at the top of a telephone pole in a blizzard at -40 degrees when over 80% of troubles turn out to be inside the house. (On a side note, there is a definite inverse relation between how insistent a customer is that the problem is outside, and the likelyhood of it actually being so...)

  23. It will take month for under cover boss to fix com by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    It will take month or maybe more for com cast to be fixed one week is to shout.

    Maybe one week in the call centers / walk in centers. 1-2 weeks in the field. And 1 week in the back end at the head ends and other NOC's.

  24. Re:But when you ask for a cable card they don't kn by mysidia · · Score: 1

    A lot of the time when you want stuff like that they don't know much about them

    That's the company line, if you ask for cablecard... "We don't know what that is." They've got to feign ignorance
    "Just rent our $LIMITED_MACHINE_WITH_FANCY_MARKETING_MATERIAL at $SUPER_INSANE_MARKUP per month or buy at $VASTLY_OVERSTATE_EQUIPMENT_WORTH."

    Example: just rent our $2000 intentionally DRM-crippled DVR for $100/month that has a capacity of 20gb, or up to 20 hours of TV recording. Pause live TV, and record it (as long as the program doesn't have a no-record flag), rewind, and fast forward (except through no-fast-forward sections such as sponsored messages, where the broadcaster paid for the no-fast-forward bit).

    Also comcast give out the POS Norton AV as well.

    Mandatory software that the cable tech is required to offer, and encouraged to push as hard as possible, due to company commissions received later for AV subscription renewal revenues.

  25. I think you need to work 6-7 days a week to hit by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    To get that pay and that is pulling long days as well.

    1. Re:I think you need to work 6-7 days a week to hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you don't understand what median means.

    2. Re:I think you need to work 6-7 days a week to hit by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he knows that the median is the guy you call a 900 number to get ones future told.

    3. Re:I think you need to work 6-7 days a week to hit by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      damn, I'd work 6-7 days a week to make 58k an hour...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  26. Special Ed, not Specialist by SJester · · Score: 1

    My last cable installer felt it was best to drill from the outside, then discover where it went. Apparently the kitchen is the best place for a cable modem and wireless router, on the countertop next to the microwave. Suggestions to the contrary were ignored. The landlord said "He's an expert. Let him handle it." I'm glad the drill didn't end up in the shower.

  27. fios ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a fios ad?

    also, this talks about all of the credentials and requirements they have... and supports that with the fact that people are connecting iPhones and Xboxes. Seriously?!?

  28. testing equipment? then don't even do that by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26702537-HD-Comcast-could-have-set-my-house-on-fire.

    They send out a box that later on one cable guy says they were supposed to stop giving these out quite awhile ago, and that they are known to do this, which is why they stopped using them...so just the guy at the Tech center was not so up to date, I suppose.

    1. why do they still give out 5-6 year old boxes? (that can't get the new guide that comcast is working or use MPEG 4 channels)

    2. why are people still being forced to rent boxes that old at prices that keep going up. Let's say $7-$16 /m has payed off that box and then some.

  29. iPhones, Xboxes and 17 = hit the download cap by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    250GB is fast being becoming to low. even more so at 10M -20M+ download speeds.

    1. Re:iPhones, Xboxes and 17 = hit the download cap by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Wait you're complaining about 250GB? Man come to canada where most ISP's are still at 60GB.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:iPhones, Xboxes and 17 = hit the download cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until my ISP gets off its ass, the closest I'm getting to the newly advertised $85/70GB and $130/100GB packages is seeing them listed on their website with my glorious $65/20GB, Though for our frugal consumers, they do offer a 5GB package for $40.

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Oh brother! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that every "remarks section" of a story dealing with Internet providers or Television providers becomes a dumping ground for pissed off malcontents bent on posting some innane rant? First off, there's a difference between traditional cable companies and telco companies providing inernet/television. Cable companies are creeping into the data centric entertainment service but still, there installers are mostly wire guys. I came into the FiOS field because it paid way more than $55k a year, mostly due to my experieince in both the EE field and the Network engineering. Before I was hooking up your brats XBox, I was either splicing fiber, setting up digital electronics such as DS1's and their relative equipment (CSU/DSU's) or managing a several hundred workstation LANs. I have an Electronic Eng. degree with a handful of certs (and not A+, Net + or any of those other "tech" certs). I have a valid C-7 license (State certified low voltage contractors license). Because Verizon pays for furthering eduction, I am working on a Network/Internet Security degree. And while this degree is an online degree through the local college, I still bust my ass with the reading and the assignments. Verizon may have hired whoever they could at first but they've been padding their workforce with degreed techs like me.

  32. Union Schools by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2

    If unions like the Communications Workers of America (CWA) taught network engineering skills to members it would make a bigger union and a better workforce. Maybe make one's tuition payable out of one's union dues, with discounts for grades above 50%ile. Trade schools should be run out of the revenue of the trade, not out of the public pocket as a subsidy to that industry. The public should be in the business only of certifying minimum education standards, properly primarily educating applicants through highschool, and stimulating the incoming student body size to ensure strategic industries have a raw labor pool on which to grow and compete.

    If the United Autoworkers had opened robotics and engineering schools for members in the 1980s instead of resisting automation, we'd have a better organized, educated and productive workforce, and a stronger domestic industry - and better cars.

    If these unions were strong enough and offered better benefits, their membership would grow enough that we could have competing unions instead of the monopoly. Then strikes and other labor negotiations would bottom line at what's actually better for the industry's workforce as a whole, instead of just the members of that union.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Union Schools by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Damn right!

      Scope out Union welding schools for how it should be done.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  33. most routers let you clone your pc's mac to them by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    So you can get around systems that lock you to 1 mac.

  34. I wish they would hire more. by CaroKann · · Score: 1

    Based on my own experiences, my cable company now tries to discourage technician visits. It takes a week to get an appointment, even if you have no service.

    Now, they are encouraging customers to go to the local cable office to pick up their own equipment and install it themselves.

    In recent years, the equipment itself has changed. The cable box is now a simple box, without even an on/off button. I think the idea is supposed to be "hook it up, plug it in, it works", requiring no expensive visit. Unfortunately it does not always work that way.

    In my case, after hooking everything up and having the cable company register the box over the phone, the box would simply die. I could not even be able to turn it on. Following their advice, I did three exchanges before I lucked out with a phone person who knew what was happening. After entering a series of secret codes using the remote, the box suddenly worked. I don't think the boxes were physically defective at all. It would have been so much easier to have someone come out.

    Now if only all of my channels would work...

    1. Re:I wish they would hire more. by swalve · · Score: 1

      It might be coincidence, but I get way faster service when I tell them my television signal is out.

    2. Re:I wish they would hire more. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Now if only all of my channels would work...

      For this you may need a public works engineer. I could recommend my moat-guy, but I heard he was injured on the job -- Alligators. Turns out he wasn't certified for Animal Control.

  35. Wages wrong by about $15k by Jonwww · · Score: 2

    The original article/post links to a page describing "Radio and Telecommunications Equipment Installers and Repairers" and their pay of $55,600, however what is actually being discussed here falls more under the "Line Installers and Repairers" description and their pay of $39,970. Hopefully that makes some of you feel better about the service (or lack thereof) you received from your 'cable guy'. The correct link for this job description is.... http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos195.htm

    1. Re:Wages wrong by about $15k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, the wages are way off. My husband was a BBT3 for Charter and made $17 an hour. You'd need a hell of a lot of overtime to get to 55K. Here installers are manly contractors paid per job. When he started in '04, he was paid just over $11 an hour, it definitely isn't a high paying job. He currently works IT for another company and starting pay there was $17 an hour. The techs that know their stuff and are good at it, move on to better paying jobs with better conditions. Every natural disaster we say glad we are he isn't out working in it.

    2. Re:Wages wrong by about $15k by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Actually that description is for the people who work on the distribution lines (on the poles, or buried).

      Most of the discussion here has been about the installers, who work outdoors to connect the line to the internal coax network, and then indoors to place and connect a cable box and cable modem and connect them to the existing coax network. They fall between several BLS categories, and rarely earn more than $29k per year and often far less (far below linemen). They do not require any degree, and have minimal training, thus being literally unskilled labor.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    3. Re:Wages wrong by about $15k by Jonwww · · Score: 1

      They are in some gray area between the 2 descriptions but the one I linked to is more accurate for the average cable tech. Most cable techs are not network specialists by any means, by job title or pay. The tech that comes into your house most likely has no degree (as nice as that would be) for anything, much less in the technology field.

    4. Re:Wages wrong by about $15k by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Oh I agree that the job description for "Line Installers and Repairers" is much closer to the job the installer does than the description for "Radio and Telecommunications Equipment Installers and Repairers".

      The problem is that the salary figures for "Line Installers and Repairers" are much, much higher than what the average installer makes.

      A tiny number of top "Line Installers and Repairers" might actually qualify for the title "network specialist", but only because they are overqualified for their job.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  36. Experts in something else besides IT by klui · · Score: 1

    I think they're experts in routing cables in very tight and uncomfortable spaces like attics and crawl spaces. They would often want to route stuff directly through a wall rather than in-wall because it's the easier to do the former. But I appreciate their expertise in this area. Connecting stuff to MPOEs and NIDs they definitely know that stuff. How to tell if the wiring into a premises are electrical or telco, yup. Splicing fiber, definitely. I'm surprised they're paid that low because I've asked a contractor how much it would cost to route networking and video cables in a home and I was quoted $4500 for 20 drops.

    But in terms of hooking stuff to an enterprise switch, I have doubts most of them know about VLANs and stuff like that.

  37. No so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $55K exceeds the median household income which include multiple earner households. So its not so bad a salary.

  38. Larry the Network Specialist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming Soon!

  39. and yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They still get paid slightly more than minimum wage.

    More of a reason to hate Comcast and their scumbag Executives. Require more education for installers but refuse to pay them a living wage.

    Anyone who says they get $55K is a moron. they Get $28-$30K

    1. Re:and yet... by gottspeed · · Score: 1

      All of this can be solved by getting a ticket in the parent trade and making $80,000 a year. You get what you settle for.

  40. About to be let go by mbone · · Score: 1

    In my experience, it is an iron rule that when you find a good service tech for home accounts, they are about to be let go or take a buy-out or their department is being outsourced or whatever. And, when I say "about to be let go," I mean "have gotten notice."

  41. IT needs apprenticeships or trade schools not CS by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Lot's IT / networking stuff is very hands on and is stuff you don't get in a cs degree. And Teaching network engineering skills is what trade schools and on the job does. CS is Teaching high level theory while some theory is good CS is to much on the theory side and lack the REAL work skills.

  42. Re:They only check the signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pay isn't just for the work we do in all types of climates, it's for having to deal with people like you and smile about it =)

  43. overeducation needs = discrimination on people who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    overeducation needs = discrimination on people who can do a job / can do a trade / tech schools but not a full college.

    Renumber the old term not college material. Now we are going wrong way and makeing people get high and higher degrees for jobs that don't need them while jacking up loans at the same time as well. just to trun out people with lots book knowledge but little real work skills or knowledge

  44. You're missing the big picture by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All companies regard employees as a pain in the ass. Going by the capitalist model, all workers are essentially profit-stealing overhead. Ideally a company with no employees, run entirely by machines, is the most profitable.

    Basic economics works against the working class.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:You're missing the big picture by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      A company only needs a CEO and a director of marketing. Everyone else is profit-stealing overhead.

    2. Re:You're missing the big picture by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      Basic economics works against the working class.

      I never liked this line of reasoning. If you have no working class, who are you going to sell your shitty cell phone service to?

    3. Re:You're missing the big picture by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Wow, it's as if Marx were right all along, and his theories had never been tried out on a large scale in the 20th century.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:You're missing the big picture by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      As a CEO of Company A, you assume you'll be able to sell your stuff to employees of Company B. Or C, D, E, etc.. If your company can be employee-free, you just assume that you'll be able to sell to people who work for companies that aren't employee-free. There's always other industries too!

      No individual company director is looking at the big picture. Why would they? They only care about their own profits, by necessity.

      It's almost a Prisoner's Dilemma. Even if any given CEO knows that what they're doing will, when played out by all their peers, kill the economy, they still can't take a different approach for fear of simply being driven out of business and replaced by someone willing to stay the course.

  45. what Network Specialist uses WEP??? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    I can see a Xfinity SSID right now and they are only useing WEP.

    1. Re:what Network Specialist uses WEP??? by green1 · · Score: 1

      One who is supplied with equipment that doesn't handle WPA...

      I use WEP all the time, not by choice, but I'm shocked how many customers still have devices lying around that can't connect to a WPA encrypted access point. I'd rather set it up as WEP then completely open. (additionally, up until 2 years ago, the wireless gateways that our company were using as standard were so underpowered that they couldn't handle both WPA encryption, and 2 concurrent multicast video streams, so at the time we had to switch to WEP or customer's TVs would pixelate...)

    2. Re:what Network Specialist uses WEP??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honeypot. Enjoy jail.

  46. when I was a cable guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    back in the 80's & 90's, I was hired right out of high school w/ no experience and a bit of electrical training at school. 30 days training program, ride with other guys for a couple months, and then send you out. Granted, the services were simpler then, but the job hasn't changed much.

    1. Re:when I was a cable guy by green1 · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm the phone guy, not the cable guy, but in our world there's hardly any similarity to what the job was in the 80s and 90s.

      In the 80s telephone techs hooked up telephones on copper phone lines. The things that could cause trouble were pretty major resistive or capacitive faults which could generally be tested for, or most often heard with your own ear.

      Now "telephone techs" hook up phone, internet, and TV service on copper, fibre, and satellite, connecting customer's devices on wireless, twisted pair, coax, and powerline adapters. What can cause trouble now is very minor/insignificant resistive, capacitive, optical, RF, or IP faults which often don't show up on our best test equipment, and which can rarely be sensed without it.

      I have a 2 year computer engineering technology diploma, plus a 4 year telecommunications technician apprenticeship, plus many months of in-house training on everything from IP networking to ADSL transmission to fibre optic theory, and many many more.

      Anyone who thinks the job hasn't changed much has obviously not done the job in both time frames!

  47. man. only 50 k a year by decora · · Score: 1

    my heart bleeds. absolutely bleeds. how do they eat?

  48. Experts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the past month, I've seen installers from AT&T (twice) and Comcast (once) fail to configure their routers to the users current IP range. This left printers and anything else with static IP's unable to connect. The Comcast tech didn't know how to do an ipconfig /release-/renew on a Windows Vista computer, leaving the users computer unable to connect. He gave up and left, saying it wasn't his problem after he confirmed the Internet connection worked with his laptop.

  49. yeah im wondering why DHCP is not working by decora · · Score: 0, Troll

    i havent had to manually type in a nameserver in about 10 years.

    im guessing its another case of nerd penis rage. "the stupid service person is so stupid! and i am so smart! bewilderment!"

    no, you are just a rude, arrogant asshole, who probably got some poor schlub fired for fucking up their call response time.

    1. Re:yeah im wondering why DHCP is not working by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Fuck that poor schlub. My current WISP uses static setup for at least some users. That poor schlub should have just coughed up the information, and if he doesn't know what he's doing, he should have a job answering easier questions, like about which end of the hose you connect to the spigot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:yeah im wondering why DHCP is not working by Macrat · · Score: 1

      i havent had to manually type in a nameserver in about 10 years.

      I guess you are lucky not to have an ISP that has frequent DNS issues.

    3. Re:yeah im wondering why DHCP is not working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..or he could've just given him the damn address.

    4. Re:yeah im wondering why DHCP is not working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your ISP has frequent DNS issues, its sure sad that you think you should/are required to sue their DNS.....

  50. Re:They only check the signals by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

    Still deserve decent blue-collar salaries for wire installations.

  51. yes, those people are so filthy! by decora · · Score: 5, Funny

    one time , i even had one ask me 'how my day was going'.

    can you imagine the nerve of these servants?

    to talk to me, a LINUX user, like that? and they dont even know how to disassemble their makefiles? balderdash!

    1. Re:yes, those people are so filthy! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Darn, and my mod points expired yesterday...

      Next thing you know, they'll be wanting the vote!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  52. lol wut by decora · · Score: 1

    but in school i learned that if you work hard and study alot, you get rich!

    Y u no appreciate beauty of captalism?

    1. Re:lol wut by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      He does. It's you that doesn't because of your commie upbringing!

  53. peanuts? by decora · · Score: 1

    hmm.. it would appear that the vast majority of the people are living on peanuts.

    always funny to see a bunch of self righteous indignant assholes get violently, abusively angry at people who can survive on 1/2 the money...

  54. Re:IT needs apprenticeships or trade schools not C by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Every network tech should know (at least 25% of) Stevens' TCP/IP Illustrated, just as any structured programmer should know K&R's The C Programming Language. Whether they learn that as part of "computer science" or trade training depends on what they're learning to use the basic (if extensive) knowledge for. The more beyond that they know puts them on the spectrum of tech -> engineer -> scientist. There should be national standard certifications reflecting that knowledge, just like diplomas from highschool, college and grad school. But just as scientists aren't simply "extreme engineers", neither are network engineers necessarily less trained than computer scientists.

    And all of them, techs/engineers/scientists need actual work experience to weight and refine their academic training into a useful skillset.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  55. Let me be the first to congratulate the cable guy by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Congrats, Mr. cable guy, Larry on on youw new Net-werk specialization.

    Get 'Er Done.

    Or should he be saying.... Get 'Er surfing and streaming, and tweeting, now?

    This should be an inspiration to cable company technicians everywhere. Go get your computer science degrees and engineering level certifications.

  56. That why IT needs to be like plumbing electrician by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    That why IT needs to be like plumbing or electrician work with class room and national standard certifications. And the class room part should be a the max 1-2 years with out the real work part. And when is time to move to the real work part then class room should move to the on going ongoing education. NO intern BS.

    Also the classroom part needs to cover real work skills and case studies just like a tech schools + some base line theory. With IT there is alot that you need do hand on's or do cases studies with real skills backing to under stand and that is stuff that a theory based CS does not cover.

    That is why some meany IT projects fail they are being run by people who are MBA's and other people who don't have hands on skills while they may have the theory on why it should work or why things should be done that way. They don't the hand on work experience to see why it does not work.
    Also it does not help that CS covers a wide area and is more on the top level with big gaps in the knowledge of how all the smaller bit's of IT work.

    Even at the lower level basic networking / desktop / sever is on it's own and far apart for say wide scale networking. Some it's like some can be good with big Cisco networks but not so much on the windows / desktop side. and on the other side you can have a good desktop / windows admin how only knows the basics of Cisco.

  57. Comcast needs to properly grounded the cable by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    And some times they can't even do that right.

  58. "Slovenly" by paxcoder · · Score: 0

    Please stop using that racist adjective of yours, English speakers. Thank you. --A Slavic guy

    1. Re:"Slovenly" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not the root of that word. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=sloven&allowed_in_frame=0

  59. Re:They only check the signals by gottspeed · · Score: 1

    No they don't. They should be getting into a legitimate blue collar profession instead of snapping out all the non-regulated subbed out work from the real tradesmen. They are equivalent to the IT workers who take abusive poorly compensated tech jobs over the internet.

  60. Re:They only check the signals by gottspeed · · Score: 1

    *snapping up Of course everybody deserves to make a good living, but the nature of piece work contracts is that you're going to get the lowest bidder every time. These guys aren't even qualified, and therefore don't deserve the same compensation as those who are. IE. Actual trained data guys or electricians. FYI all wiring is an electricians field, we often sub it out because the nature of the work is that it doesn't turn enough of a profit to bother with.

  61. Re:That why IT needs to be like plumbing electrici by gottspeed · · Score: 1

    Agreed, and similar to these trades there would be different pay classes and credentials between residential, commercial and industrial environments.

  62. Re:That why IT needs to be like plumbing electrici by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    True, except that plumbers and electricians aren't trained and certified like that. Only the licensed one; most of the people working for them have no formal training and no certification. Then they do all the work that the licensed professional is supposed to be doing. The license is just a liability control, to revoke if their corner cutting goes wrong enough times.

    And their work is extremely sub-optimal. Especially when expansion, upgrade and maintenance of the plumbing or electrical work in needed, or anything unconventional would be better than the default. This is why theory as well as practice are essential to a quality professional.

    The same is true of the MBAs running IT projects. Their degree is mostly just indoctrination into a manager class. None of them have project management skills unless forced in a hiring drought to slum as a project manager. None of them have real investment skills beyond either pure market ideology or direct instrument trading experience.

    In fact so much of American education has become "talk the talk" training, hazing to indoctrinate into collusion with industry abuses and simple hiring clubs that it's tempting to ignore it as a model for where IT should go. Most of the best IT people I've known have taught themselves whatever they know, and most of the worst had some kind of certification. All this argues for reforming education overall, a tremendous undertaking that the aristocracy is already subverting into more grand theft and down-dumbing.

    A good model would redirect the many business subsidies into paying for free public education for anyone passing the entrance exams. A curriculum beyond a 20% of fulltime liberal arts core (to counterbalance the urge to toxic overspecialization) in trades delivered by trade unions (labor), with degree exams delivered by trade associations (owners) or by even higher education institutions (next employers), all vetted and certified by the government. That format would allow internships to integrate well with the education, not as an afterthought that's mostly free labor for the crappiest tasks. And naturally segue into actual hiring.

    We're heading there already, without the free public tuition part assured, and without the hand of labor orgs in the curriculum. The bosses are getting to set all the standards, which is as shortsighted and unbalanced as all of society's practices they've seized. Get the labor orgs responsible for quality in their membership, and cooperation with the bosses in producing the new labor generations, and the whole society, with the economy that measures it, running far smoother and more productively.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  63. Sorry, I don't buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Field installers are not network engineers. They know how to plug in a box that tells them "good" or "bad," but they have no idea otherwise what is going on.

    They're frighteningly good at putting ends on coax, but that's about the end of it.

  64. so buy just buying a piece of paper say BS IT is o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so buy just buying a piece of paper say BS IT is ok Most of the best IT people just to get a job?

    So choice is 40K and 4 years or much less and a few click.

    Why should some have to waste 4 years learning skills they know or don't need just to get a job?

  65. the maroon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who showed up to connect our cable in 2004 went up to outside box, stuck a big screwdriver under the hinge and destroyed the box by prying it off the house, complaining, "I hate bees!"

    we've since dumped cable and are much happier w/FIOS (installed by a recently returned Marine [God bless 'em] who learned fiber 'net installs in that cesspool of the middle east; he did a great job, even tightening up our Verizon router, which still uses 'admin' and 'password' for the defaults)

    cable? just say "No."

  66. also the time in education needs to be cut down by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    4 years is a long time after high schools for stuff like IT when A curriculum that has a real job / apprenticeships part of it that not only get's people working faster it also frees up room in schools for people as well.

    1. Re:also the time in education needs to be cut down by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It's true, but the other skills you learn apart from the technical skills are important, too. Not just in being a real adult, able to deal with the complexities of work and life, but also in communications skills, longterm planning, self-direction, that are important for the job. It should be optional, but it should be doable without stalling your career. The better interns in a school should be able to get some work that pays even a little, while the free tuition should give them the ability to take part time, low pay work in their trade or outside it. Developing that kind of balance is another place that unions can help, from experience and out of self interest in developing the labor pool rather than merely exploiting it to compete with graduated workers.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  67. Verizon to Comcast by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    As long as we're comiserating about incompetent techs and crappy internet providers, here's my little gem of a story.
    I'm not thrilled about the notion of moving to Comcast's internet service, (Comcast sometimes gets under my skin) but I've totally had it with Verizon's DSL division. Nothing could be worse. Months ago, I called the Verizon DSL division to see about getting a newer DSL modem, as mine was one of the first ones Verizon distributed, it was 10 to 11 years old. And sorta slow. After a long hold time, I talked to a tech, apparently on the other side of the world, they said I should definitely upgrade it, and said they'd send me a new modem in 2 to 3 weeks, and if I sent my original back within 30 days there's no charge. Cool beans.
    So two weeks later I get in the mail.. ..a phone cord! Ta-da! Are they kidding? Seriously?

    I called them back, and after waiting on hold for 40 minutes, said I was expecting a new modem, and I hoped they didn't expect me to send my original back yet, or charge me for a modem I didn't get. This tech -also from the other side of the planet- gives me the same story, 2 to 3 weeks, yadda yadda.. 3 weeks later, I get in the mail... a DSL filtering kit. What the fuck? They're idiots!
    You would think I'm making this up but they're actually this incompetent, it'd be funny as hell if it didn't' piss me off.

    My wife called them back this time, for a third shot at it, she also waited 40 minutes, but she finally talked to someone within 2000 miles of our house. He apologized, and offered to make it up to us by not only sending their top of the line DSL modem, but by also waiving the necessity of sending the original one back, to make up for the aggravation. I really don't care about their top of the line modem, I just wanted one a newer one without bells and whistles, but the wife had said okay, so....
    Finally, this time I actually got the modem. Yay. Only, it's got built-in wireless and routing, and I already have a wireless Linksys router with a lot of customized configuration on it (mac table filter, etc); I just need a DSL *modem*. I'd been busy lately and I wasn't looking forward to the hassle of getting the new wireless router/modem to play nice with my network, so I put off installing it. (Maybe I could just have left the wireless bit turned off, I'm not sure).
    More to the point, I also didn't send the old one back, as 1) we were told we wouldn't be asked to, as part of the "restitution", and 2) I was still using it.
    So, two months later, we got charged $65 for the top of the line modem we weren't supposed to get charged for. FML. And, because they didn't like how we wouldn't pay for it at first, they cut off my cell phone service! (We have all 3 plans -landline, cell, internet- bundled) The wife paid them just to get my cell service back, despite my protests.

    I could call them back yet again, but what difference would it make? They won't clear it up, they're utterly incompetent. And I don't believe in calling the BBB, they're just in bed with the corporations.
    I say 3 strikes and you're out. Screw these assholes. And honestly, Comcast is faster anyway, I've seen neighbor's connections. I'm canceling my account next week and going cable, and when they ask why, I'll ask for a manager so he can get an earful. Hopefully I can sell the DSL kit and modem on eBay and get some of my money back.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  68. Re:so buy just buying a piece of paper say BS IT i by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    None of that is what I said - indeed, the opposite. At least I think so, based on your unintelligible post.

    Your post is so illiterate and stupid that I expect you're not good at anything.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  69. Very reasonable salary. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    When you consider they basically become "experts" of setting up a rather cookie-cutter wireless router setup and helping connect up the PS3 and iPad after half a dozen installs, ~$50K a year is a perfectly reasonable salary for a very repetitive task, so don't make it sound like they're drastically underpaid. They are not network specialists and certainly not network engineers when you can usually stump them by uttering words like "traceroute" and "nslookup".

    Not saying they're all that limited in knowledge, but the ones I've dealt with would seriously be struggling if they were tossed into an IT shop for a week.

  70. Re:They only check the signals by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    Haha. I once had to deal with a new building wired with CAT5. All the little lights on the tester worked, but no data went through. It turned out that the installer had kept the same wires to the same pins at both ends, but had split up all the twisted pairs, which of course broke the isolation from interference. AND he had run all the wiring down through the same hole in the floor from the wiring closet as the main power line coming into the building. Sigh. It's a good thing that the induced 60Hz on the CAT5 wasn't enough to fry some routers, but not much was actually plugged in at that point.

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  71. Flamebait much? by F69631 · · Score: 1

    You appear to have a positive karma, so I choose not to ignore that post as a troll.

    Did you read the post you respond to? I linked to a page with several definitions (some of which overlap, others are mutually exclusive) and stated that by some of those definitions, all bloggers are journalists and by other definitions none of them are. And mentioned, that my based on the definition that I like the most, some of them are journalists.

    How is that ignoring the others that contradict me?

    1. Re:Flamebait much? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      And mentioned, that my based on the definition that I like the most, some of them are journalists.

      How is that ignoring the others that contradict me?

      The point is that bloggers who are attempting to appeal to popular culture are journalists by definition.

      Don't put any stock in karma. Read my posting history to decide how you feel about me. It won't take long.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  72. Network Specialists who connect right to the net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Mom called Comcast because her Internet was out, and the tech who showed up said, "clearly your wifi is the problem", ignoring the fact that her connection had worked fine for about a year and she was able to stream movies to her Boxee Box from her Linux file server. He proceeded to change out the modem (the ACTUAL source of the problem) and then connected her Windows PC directly to the new cablemodem. I had to drive from Philly to Orlando to reverse all the damage that piece of trash did. What a complete jerk. You do NOT connect PCs directly to the Internet anymore.

  73. Still a pain by dbIII · · Score: 1

    How many of us actually have the MAC address of our PCs written on bits of paper just in case we need it if the machine dies? While cards may have it printed on most motherboards don't.

  74. Re:so buy just buying a piece of paper say BS IT i by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Because employers can't afford to put every candidate through a two-day series of intensive exams and assessments to determine their actual skill level. Employers barely bother to skim a CV. The piece of paper tells them that this candidate has passed a course, and so probably isn't a total idiot in the field.

  75. 50K is low? by CryptDemon · · Score: 1

    Since when is 50K a low salary? I know programmers with CS degrees that get paid less than that. I also know professional AV specialists that do network and av drops that only get paid about 40k a year. 50K is pretty good for a skilled labor job if you ask me. They're not engineers or scientists, so they don't get engineer and scientist pay. They get damn good technician pay.

  76. Larry the Cable Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The last thing I want is this slovenly pig coming in my house and loading up my computer with incest porn and bookmarks to Stormfront...

  77. well then may better and cheaper piece of paper by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    That why bypassing tech schools and wanting 4 year CS for jobs tech / IT jobs is wrong way to do it. That is why IT needs a outside trade / union to help with that.

    and what does a piece of paper prove when you get people who don't know the basics.

  78. WTF :Union Schools by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    Why hell should the union provide training that is the job of the employers/industry? What is the Trade union issue here brother? The only training a union needs todo is to train its activists and officers in their specialized needs eg employment law and dealing with cases.

    Unions have a role in lobbying for things like industry training levies making sure that state funds go to vocational courses and not to run bogus sports departments like all the American universities do.

    1. Re:WTF :Union Schools by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Because unions have a vested interest in the education of their members that employers clearly do not. Employers have failed to do this, and society has failed to do it adequately. Training by employers is of course going to tie labor to a specific employer, while training by unions should give labor the mobility among employers that capital has gained to outcompete labor.

      The present roles of unions and employers has been extremely bad for the unions. The lobbying model is a game rigged for employers against unions.

      Unions should do whatever they can to improve labor conditions, which includes education. I am not saying that unions should pay for the development of the curriculum; the public and private institutions should pay, out of the cost of tuition and taxes (which should pay for tuition).

      Again, look at the UAW: if it had trained its members in automation starting in the 1970s instead of relying on lobbying, its members could have gained a lot more from the growth since then that has been driven by automation, instead of losing to the foreign labor that did it. Offering free education to grow its membership in more productive jobs would have swelled its ranks, rather than see it abandoned and even widely vilified. And an educational partnership with employers could have been a big part of cooperation which could have helped avert the bust the American car corps just went through, which nearly destroyed all union contracts through bankruptcy and did exact major, perhaps crippling, concessions.

      The car industry through the 1960s was as high tech and good paying as is the telecom industry today. The education turning point at which the UAW failed to turn in the 1970s is fast approaching the CWA. If the CWA took charge of the trade education it could ensure it steers its members and the industry on a sustainable, growing course. Or it could insist on doing only what US unions have done for generations, and continue doing what US unions have done for generations: steadily die.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  79. Not everyone is cut out for school. Not every scho by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Not everyone is cut out for school. Not every school is worth the tens of thousands in loans it takes to go there. Now That is there the look for a piece of paper get's you.

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-years-resolutions-for-uncle-sam-2011-12-30?link=MW_story_investinginsight

  80. Your mileage may vary by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    Around here, Time Warner uses a lot of 3rd party installers, and you are very lucky if you get one who is not a trashy moron. One guy insisted my newly installed cable would work "in a little while," after he left. Of course it did not magically fix itself after he called it a day. Another chap, who looked like a hillbilly who had just woken up after a five-day bender (complete with half-buttoned shirt and greasy hair), used my master bathroom to take a dump, then couldn't offer any solution to the weak signal upstairs. Maybe other folks have had better experiences, but it seems that cable "techs" have collectively earned their bad reputation.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  81. I plugged my laptop into the ONT by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 1

    I hear you. Last time I had a problem with my FiOS, when the tech showed up rather than waste time going thru my stuff, I took him outside and plugged a laptop directly into the ONT and showed him how bad the connection was right there. He traced the problem back upstream from the ONT and said a connection on the buried fiber optic line had come loose and gotten mud in it. When he opened it water and mud came pouring out. He cleaned the connection, reconnected it, and put silicone wrap around it. Problem fixed.

  82. This breaks location based services by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    There's a problem with using some central DNS servers out in the wild somewhere. This breaks location based services such as Akamai. I too used to use Google's DNS servers until one day I downloaded a service pack from Microsoft and found I was getting around 350kb/s rather than the 1.9mb/s I usually get. Quick survey found this problem was wide spread with various downloads.

    These services provide your with an IP address based on the location of the DNS server you use. Once I switched back to my ISP's DNS I got back to the speeds I'm used to.

    These days I take the middle route by running my own caching DNS server at home. It seems to be the best of all worlds. Control, conformity to standards, and speed.

  83. Stopped at the door by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I refuse to let the "cable guy" inside my house. If I have a problem, I tell them to check it to the connection point coming into the house. I'll take it from there. "But we need to bla bla bla". No, you don't! I don't want you touching one key on my computer...PERIOD! Seen way to many people have computers screwed up by "cable installers", who have no clue what they are doing. If you have a signal getting to the junction box, I can handle it from there. I wouldn't even let them install my cable gateway (I hate the term modem). I said unless I can pick up the box myself & install it....I'll just go with something else.

  84. Re:But when you ask for a cable card they don't kn by Samizdata · · Score: 1

    Well, in my previous reply, describing the issues with Comcast's self-install captive portal, I was pretty quickly able to talk the tech around the necessity of their software install. I wonder if it was because I actually used the term "captive portal"? And I can SO guarantee I am so much more secure than one of the everyday boxes they deal with.

    --
    It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  85. Network "Specialist"? by Zeekort · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to work in Level3 for a cable company and I can tell you that most of the techs don't even check the RF power levels on the lines half the time. Heck, I've had to send a FOREMAN out just to get someone that would actually unplug a modem to trace a simple RF problem to a splitter and have it fixed in 5 minutes or less. Forget about even expecting them to know how to check the IP address the customer was getting if they can't even take care of an RF issue that "technically" they should be experts in for all the checks they do on the lines for regular TV service all the time.

    The fatal flaw of the article is that the techs they mention in it are all foreman level or supervisors. NONE of which are the regular cable techs that we all know and loath. Install techs are also better trained and have higher expectations placed on them so they are (generally) at least a little better than the average tech but still no where near being called a "Specialist" given that many of them still needed one of us to tell them how to put in a wireless key on a MAC or PC.

    That being said though, the cable industry itself is changing. Gradually all cable techs will have no choice but to actually learn something or take a hike thanks to the newer technologies coming out (ex DOCSIS Set-top Gateway).

  86. Re:They only check the signals by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    >>All they ever do is use their meter to check the signals coming through the line. If the signals are good that is all they are interested in.

    It may be a union issue.

    I had problems at the last place I lived at (and this place, too, come to think of it), due to what I was told was a leaking conduit ruining the connection between my apartment and the nearest box, causing intermittent outages, which would last up to three or four days at a time. Couldn't get cable modem, so AT&T copper was my only real choice. They'd take a week to come out, so the internet would be back up by then, they'd test the cable, say it was fine, and then leave.

    It took a dozen or so service calls to finally get them to dig up the yard and fix the conduit. But in the meantime, a number of guys came out, told me things they would try if they weren't prohibited by it by union rules, and then leave. Was... frustrating.

    At my new place, the problem was that my house was phantom dialing random numbers without even having a single phone plugged in. I got a huge long distance bill and three visits from the police (random 911 dial) - that shit got fixed QUICKLY.

  87. Re:They only check the signals by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Haha. I once had to deal with a new building wired with CAT5. All the little lights on the tester worked, but no data went through. It turned out that the installer had kept the same wires to the same pins at both ends, but had split up all the twisted pairs, which of course broke the isolation from interference.

    That's not a CAT-5 "tester" it's just a basic $5 continuity check. Any installer worth their salt has a "certification" tester, and before they get paid will sign-off on the fact that every cable they ran fully checks out to CAT-5 specifications, per their (moderately-) expensive certification tester. Even small issues like the pairs being untwisted just a bit too far when the ends were installed, will be flagged by any halfway decent tester.

    Nobody should be running a non-trivial sized network without a decent tester. A Fluke CableIQ is well worth the money (about $1,000). But even a much older 100BaseTx Fluke tester (about $250 on ebay last I looked) will be pretty strict and catch almost all cable installer mistakes.

    I'm hesitant to recommend it, but you can also look into the Byte Brothers RWC1000 for about $300. It makes a very good probe, has an interesting work-flow for cable-testing that can save time in a number of cases if your usage happens to line up with it's design, and it's a good enough tester that it'll at least flag more serious wiring mistakes, but it's clearly not even as hypercritical of cabling as older 100BaseT Fluke testers I've used...

    So you've got to pick your priorities. You get some more useful features with a RWC that you'd want if your company is small and doesn't already have them in discrete units, but it's not as good at cable testing... it's main function. And it's slower and less amenable to one-man operation than better tools (the market dominated by Fluke).

    AND he had run all the wiring down through the same hole in the floor from the wiring closet as the main power line coming into the building.

    Besides being an issue in itself, that's clearly a very basic building code violation in most if not all jurisdictions. I have a hard time believing any bonded contractor would be so stupid. Did your company hire some unlicensed teenager with no professional experience, at slave wages?

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  88. networking? by KingAlanI · · Score: 2

    I've dealt with plenty of level 1 tech support BS, but I've never had a problem with home installers.

    the install techs just make sure the modem is hooked up. I can and do handle the home networking myself. (I suppose this could be specified in the ordering process, so the ISP knows what techs to send out and with what equipment)

    Cox - apartment was already wired, so tech just needed to hook up the modem and make sure the line still worked. the only device was my PC, so networking was a moot point
    Time Warner - house was not already wired, techs spent a lot of time working out the cable run. switched from another ISP, used the existing home networking setup with the new modem/ISP

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  89. Cox in northern Virginia seems guilty of this by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Cox in northern Virginia seems guilty of this. They seem to use their bandwith cap mainly as an upsell opportunity. (as opposed to hard enforcement like throttling or absolute cutoff).

    I didn't hit that cap even when I tried to use plenty of bandwith. However, I didn't run my bit torrent client quite as often. (I started off a bunch of torrents, didn't do as much uploading after the initially propagated)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  90. I've got a guy for that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My last comcast service installer was a Wiz! He had it going in nothing flat! Here are my steps for repeating my experience, and getting the best available!

    1. Purchase your own cable modem/box or go and pick up the rented hardware from the local Comcast service center.
    2. Install everything yourself.
    3. Call to have it activated.

  91. Re:They only check the signals by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    I was just a contractor myself, building out a small ISP in the building that was to be located in the building. The wiring was contracted to a local company that was supposed to be competent. I think they were much more used to wiring telephone systems. They had a hard time believing there was a problem until I demonstrated, in fact I actually took a couple of wall outlets apart to see what was going on, which was when the problem was 'uncovered' so to speak. This was all back in 1996 or 1997, so it was early days for CAT-5 in general, especially out in the wilds of Central Oregon. I think it was actually the first CAT-5 installation in the area. But the installer should have known better than to split twisted pairs in any case - that's just basic.

    It was definitely a screw-up.

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  92. I call bullshit on this. by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

    They sent out a "Network Specialist" to trouble shoot my cable modem. I walked to the bathroom and stopped by the fridge to get a drink....in that short amount of time, I see the guy ripping cross connects out of my switch, (this has nothing to do with the cable modem, mind you)....and I wasn't even polite about it, "WHAT THE F*CK ARE YOU DOING?!?!?!"

    his reply: "I'm testing the network, but everytime I do an ipconfig /release and /renew it gets a 192. address"

    Mine: "NO SHIT SHERLOCK, that's an INTERNAL NETWORK IP....if you want the external IP you have to do the command FROM THE ROUTER YOU IDIOT......now back off for 10 minutes so I can fix what you've screwed up"

    Network specialist my ass, how the hell did this article make it out of the "recently posted" section?!?

    (Note: This was with Suddenlink....they're absolutely horrible, they don't understand the technology, cable TV or Internet...and I'll never move to another Suddenlink market again. I'm with Cox now, and I've got 55/5 and I'm please)

    --
    There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
  93. Can it be possible that by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    both Capitalism and Communism are doomed?

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!