Slashdot Mirror


Bob Anderson, the Man Behind Vader's Lightsaber, Dies at 89

An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt from Australia's ABC News: "Bob Anderson, an Olympic swordsman who staged fights for films including the Star Wars and Lord of the Rings trilogy, has died at the age of 89. ... Anderson donned Darth Vader's black helmet and fought light-saber battles in two of the three original Star Wars films, The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi, but his role was not initially publicized." The accompanying video clips are great; I never thought about anyone being in the Vader suit besides David Prowse.

36 of 99 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory Family Guy by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

    What would Star Wars have been like if James Earl Jones also did the stunts? RIP, they don't make guys that can do all the special effects without green screens like you anymore.

  2. Only the second two films by Noughmad · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anderson donned Darth Vader's black helmet and fought light-sabre battles in two of the three original Star Wars films, The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi

    The epic duel between Vader and Obi-Wan was apparently so bad they had to hire an Olympic swordsman just to make things 'OK'.

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    1. Re:Only the second two films by lord_mike · · Score: 4, Informative

      That and the fact that the Ep IV sabers were so brittle, they weren't even allowed to make full contact with each other. The actors were told to keep it as gentle as possible 'cos the sabers kept shattering. The original light sabers actually emanated... you know... light. They wee made of real light bulbs in them illuminating a lucite-type material. You can actually see the power cord on Obi-Wan's wrist in one of the shots. Later on, they decided to colorize them after the fliming, It was only in later films that they decided to just use sticks and draw all of the effects in post production. The episode IV's fight scene's "lameness" is partially a result of the actors having to be gentle and play nice with their fragile props. Alec Guinness was actually an accomplished swordsman himself, but he was forced to "tone it down".

    2. Re:Only the second two films by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually they didn't "Emit" light, they were covered with front projection screen material and a beamsplitter was used to bounce light off it and back into the camera. Low tech optical effects, but complex. Then they tinted the film. Later they just painted it in. They couldn't hit them very hard because it would knock off a big cloud of the coating. Look at the old films to see that.

  3. Did some great work by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I loved the lightsaber fights in the original trilogy (particularly RotJ). They were perfectly paced; fast enough to be exciting, but slow enough that you could read a pace and flow to them. They were supported by those wonderful sound effects and music that matched the action perfectly.

    By contrast, the lightsaber battles in the prequels left me absolutely cold. It felt like Lucas had watched the Matrix and decided that he wanted that bullet-time wire-fu in his film whether it actually worked or not. The Darth Maul fight in Ep 1 gets a better press than it deserves on the basis of Duel of the Fates (which is a great piece of film music), but other than that, I couldn't see any of the Ep 1-3 battles as anything but soul-less exercises in camera trickery. They're too fast and there's no drama to them. There's just a lot of flailing about and then somebody wins.

    Bottom line, talented performers and traditional effects outperformed modern CGI and wire-fu.

    1. Re:Did some great work by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the main problem with the duels in the new films was the decision to make the Jedi so cold and monk-like. With the exception of a very few choice moments from Ewan McGregor, there is very little emotion or soul in those fights. They come off as more academic exercises than "I'm fighting for my life here" battles.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Did some great work by Tanktalus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree with AC. However, there seem to be good reason for the difference, just in story-telling.

      In eps 1-3, there were dozens, if not hundreds, of jedi. Plenty to practice and hone your fencing skills with. I would expect fast swordplay if only because the goal of any military action (and that's what a sword fight is) is a quick decision, not a prolonged battle. The quicker you dispatch your enemy, the sooner you can move on to the next action, and the less likely an ambush.

      Meanwhile, in eps 4-6, Vader, Obi-Wan, and Luke really don't have anyone to practice with, at least not in the previous 16-20 years (yeah, yeah, I don't really know what the timeline between 3 and 4 is). I would expect their actions to be a bit clunky. Especially Vader, being "more machine than man." And I'm not sure he ever really embraced his cyborg nature the way that General Greivous did, making it somewhat of an internal battle just to move.

      That said, I agree that the sound effects are definitely key - they take good scenes and make them great.

  4. Not just Star Wars by NorbrookC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He was the swordmaster behind LOTR and the Princess Bride. His skill was not just being able to do it, but to teach others to do it so it looked right on screen. RIP, Bob Anderson.

    1. Re:Not just Star Wars by YttriumOxide · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Princess Bride has absolutely some of the best swordplay I've ever seen on screen. Obviously the "famous duel" between Inigo and Westley gets a bit silly, but it's intended to be so (and is still really good anyway).

      For reference, I'm pretty handy with a sword myself, so I do know what I'm looking for in "realism" when watching films - most do pretty woefully.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    2. Re:Not just Star Wars by aslagle · · Score: 5, Informative

      He took the line in The Princess Bride that went something like 'they had the best swordfight ever', and turned it into the best sword fight on film I've ever seen.

      Cary Elwes and Mandy Patinkin practiced constantly for that fight scene, during breaks in filming, and it shows. Nothing beats doing something for real. Saying "we'll fix it in post" using CGI has become a crutch, I think.

    3. Re:Not just Star Wars by DaViking · · Score: 5, Informative

      The great thing about the "Chatty Duel" in the Princess Bride is how simple the blade work actually is. Besides the acrobatics and tossing of swords the fencing is relatively simple and well executed. That scene has generated more interest in fencing than any of our recent Olympic achievements can hope to. Nearly every student I've taught has been influenced to seek out the sport in part by that film and after 6 months or so I will tell them to re-watch it and see all the actions they just learned. As was said above, he was able to create such elegant choreography and able to teach the actors to perform it with such skill he was able to create so many of the great and memorable film duels.

      --
      (This sig intentionally left blank.)
    4. Re:Not just Star Wars by netwarerip · · Score: 3

      Loved the Princess Bride swordfight, but my all-time favorite is Basil Rathbone and Errol Flynn in Robin Hood.

  5. Re:Meanwhile... by paintballer1087 · · Score: 5, Funny

    the real guy behind Darth Vador

    -5 Nerd points

    the real guy behind Darth Vader

    FTFY

  6. I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The light saber fights in the first 3 (eps 4,5,6) were clunky and slow and looked planned. It looks like they rehearsed once and then filmed.

    Whereas the last 3 (eps 1,2,3) were wonderfully choreographed - they looked real - the choreographed "mistakes" looked great. The last 3 actually looked like the actors spent many many hours practicing (they did) and it showed.

    The first part of the Trilogy did the saber fighting much better than the second part of the Trilogy (eps: 4,5,6)

    1. Re:I disagree. by sunking2 · · Score: 2

      I'll only agree with you on ep 3. The Vader/Obi Wan fight was painfully poor. And notice this guy didn't work on that one. I think that Lucas had no idea that his little creation would take off like it did and that his light saber concoction would turn into what it did, so not a great deal of effort was put into it.

    2. Re:I disagree. by Morty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The light saber fights in the first 3 (eps 4,5,6) were clunky and slow and looked planned. It looks like they rehearsed once and then filmed.

      Whereas the last 3 (eps 1,2,3) were wonderfully choreographed - they looked real - the choreographed "mistakes" looked great. The last 3 actually looked like the actors spent many many hours practicing (they did) and it showed.

      The first part of the Trilogy did the saber fighting much better than the second part of the Trilogy (eps: 4,5,6)

      As a former fencer, I completely agree on the fight quality. During the lightsaber battles in the original three movies, the actors' movements were relatively slow and often didn't actually threaten their opponents. They're somewhat painful to watch: I keep thinking "stop thrust, stop thrust!" The actors in the newer trilogies look like they're mostly actually trying to fight each other. Although even in the new series, there still are plenty of moments when someone leaves themselves open to do something showy (i.e. swing their saber backwards) and their opponent doesn't press the advantage.

      That said, in terms of fight choreography, what looks good isn't always what's most realistic.

    3. Re:I disagree. by RogueyWon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ep 4 is a bit clunky, yes. As other posters have noted, that was made before they brought in the expertise they needed - so you get a fight which is basically two untrained old(ish) men taking swings at each other.

      But what you get in Eps 5 and 6 is a sense of story to the fight. In 5, when Luke fights Vader, he's clearly lost the fight before it even begins. He's distracted and off-balance. Vader's the older, smarter and more skilled fighter. Luke tries gamely enough to begin with, but every swing he takes is turned against him. Vader's not going all out; he doesn't want to kill, so he bides his time and breaks down his opponent before going for a disabling blow.

      In Ep 6, the battle in the throne room begins much the same way. Luke is, once again, at a disadvantage (though he's more aware of it this time). However, once he "snaps" and charges Vader (culminating in him chopping Vader's hand off), his style changes completely. He leaves himself wide open and goes for all-out attack. To use an analogy from fighting games; he's button-mashing. And it catches Vader off guard. Vader's probably still more skilled, but he's also older and slower. He can't keep up with Luke, let alone counter-attack.

      In Eps 5 and 6, the fights help to tell the story. The genius of the choreography of the fights is that it takes place at a pace which allows the average viewer to actually pick up on that.

      By contrast, the eps 1-3 fights have very little sense of story to them. They're more concerned with "wow factor" and, to put a cynical hat on for a moment, with making sure that everybody gets a chance to look cool to boost the toy sales. I never got a sense that a character's emotional state is being reflected in how they fight.

    4. Re:I disagree. by Endo13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wish I could mod you up.

      So many people seem to forget that Star Wars (original trilogy at least) wasn't action film, nor sci fi - it was space opera. The drama is the real point of the films. Realism in small details is pretty much irrelevant. That's what they lost in the prequels, which is why so many Star Wars fans despise them.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    5. Re:I disagree. by aitikin · · Score: 2

      This is one of the best analyses of some of the finer points of Star Wars that I have ever read. For the first time in five years, I'm going to have to get back my copy of the original trilogy and re-watch it just to get that awe that you re-instilled in that post.

      Thank you.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    6. Re:I disagree. by smi.james.th · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's worth thinking about it a different way perhaps. In episodes 1, 2 and 3, we find the Jedi in their prime, so naturally they'd be quick and good etc. In episodes 4, 5 and 6 though, there's Obi-Wan and Vader who are very old and Luke who is a complete newby, so their light-sabre skills will be somewhat less than say Darth Maul in episode 1.

      Just my 2c.

      --
      One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
    7. Re:I disagree. by bckrispi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One thing that's always amused me about the SW saber fights: almost all sword swings are dodged, parried, or blocked. But a punch or kick (or carbonite exhaust pipe to the face)? Connects 100% of the time! Bonus points if the hit happens on a ledge.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    8. Re:I disagree. by Kjella · · Score: 2

      As a former fencer, I completely agree on the fight quality. During the lightsaber battles in the original three movies, the actors' movements were relatively slow and often didn't actually threaten their opponents.

      On the other hand, they didn't stop using the Force and become sword fighters with flashy swords. I mean they could stop blaster shots with those, so why aren't the light saber battles lightning fast? I always felt that Jedi vs Sith was a battle of minds as much as swords, like two mind readers trying to surprise each other where the rules are different and where the obvious moves are anticipated moves so they do no good. I'm not saying the sword play was great, I'm just saying I'm not sure it'd make the movies any better to me if they'd been master swordsmen. At least my mind made up a perfectly good explanation of why they spend most their duels doing silly and flashy moves.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:I disagree. by bckrispi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But what you get in Eps 5 and 6 is a sense of story to the fight. In 5, when Luke fights Vader, he's clearly lost the fight before it even begins. He's distracted and off-balance. Vader's the older, smarter and more skilled fighter. Luke tries gamely enough to begin with, but every swing he takes is turned against him. Vader's not going all out; he doesn't want to kill, so he bides his time and breaks down his opponent before going for a disabling blow.

      You need to watch the fight more closely. At the beginning of the fight, yes, Vader is toying with him. He holds his saber loosely with one hand. He simply sizes Luke up as being no threat at all. "All too easy. Perhaps you're not as strong as the Emperor thought." Shortly after this, however, Luke escapes the Carbonite chamber, gives Vader a face full of exhaust gas, and kicks him off the platform. By the time we reach the gantry, Vader is going 'balls out' in his fighting. Even then, Luke connects a swing with Vader's shoulder, which is only saved by his armor.

      By contrast, the eps 1-3 fights have very little sense of story to them. They're more concerned with "wow factor" and, to put a cynical hat on for a moment, with making sure that everybody gets a chance to look cool to boost the toy sales. I never got a sense that a character's emotional state is being reflected in how they fight.

      You had your "prequel blinders" on. :) Episode 1: Recall the scene where Obi wan, Qui gon, and Darth Maul were separated by the force fields. Obi wan stood pensively and anxiously. Separated from his master, he's unsure what to do next. Darth Maul paces in his chamber like rabid animal locked in a cage. Qui gon... sits down and _closes his eyes_ in meditation. Everything you need to know about what these three characters think of this fight is right _there_.

      Episode 2: Obi-wan versus Dooku - Watch the look on Christopher Lee's face as he mocks and taunts Obi wan. He clearly has the upper hand, and isn't afraid to show it. Dooku vs. Anakin - I liked this fight because it spent more time focusing on lighting and shadow than it did on the swordplay. Very indicative of the blurry line that Anakin is walking between the light and dark sides. It's the outcome of this fight (Anakin's dismemberment) that feeds his growing desire for revenge that he'll unleash in the next film. Yoda vs. Dooku? Come on! What fanboy who saw ESB when he was 6 in 1980 _didn't_ feel it was worth the 22 year wait to see him kick some ass. Best of all, as soon as the fight was finished, he reached for his walking stick. This simple act shows the nature of how a "true" jedi uses the Force.

      Episode 3: You get _five_ saber battles here. Pick your favorite. My favorites were Mace Windu vs. Sidious (Come on! The head of the Jedi Order vs. a Sith Master? How much more "story" do you need to fill in the blanks here? Plus, as the event that finally pushes Anakin "over the edge", it's importance to the narrative cannot be overstated) , and Obi wan vs. Anakin. What needs to be said about it? Obi wan busts Anakin joining Sideous, murdering hundreds of Jedi (including children), and nearly murdering his pregnant wife. How much more motivation does Obi wan need at this point to turn to fisticuffs? Plus, you have the entire mythological narrative involving the Descent to Hell, eternal damnation, and attempted redemption. This fight, more than any other, shows two combatants who are pretty much evenly matched throughout the whole fight.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    10. Re:I disagree. by Kurt+Granroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hear this theory quite a bit and I believe that Lucas himself has said this to be the case. I don't buy it. The entire Jedi mythology holds that it's the Jedi's mastery of the Force that gives him the ability to fight with a light saber. They made it very explicit with Yoda's fight with Dooku -- Yoda was hundreds of years old and practically disabled, but his immense mastery of the Force gave him incredible fighting abilities. If anything, Obi-Wan and Vader's age should have increased their skills, not decreased them.

    11. Re:I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I recall*, Alec Guiness was given instructions during the filming of Episode 4 that the lightsaber was intended to be a heavy weapon, more like a massive two-hander than a lightning-quick rapier; a weapon that required two hands to wield properly. And although the battles did become slightly more fluid in Episodes 5 and 6, you can still see this philosophy in the fights between Luke and Vader in Episodes 5 and 6; Luke frequently was filmed swinging the lightsaber with two hands, hacking at foes like a lumberjack slicing into a tree.The elegance of the weapon had little to do with how it was used in combat and more to do with the preference of single champions settling a dispute rather than relying on blaster-armed battalions waging war across star systems.

      By the time the prequels were filmed, the lightsabers had become light enough to be wielded as one-handed weapons, leaving the second hand free for force powers or dual wielding. The style had entirely changed because the concept of the weapon had changed.

      * citation needed, I know. Except all my Star Wars books are all back at home ;-)

    12. Re:I disagree. by DarKnyht · · Score: 2

      There was also the fact that originally the lightsabers were supposed to be difficult to hold/control. They were told in episode 4 specifically not to fight in a traditional fencing style because they needed both hands to control the power of the blades. Then there were the also mentioned issues with the props themselves breaking.

      I am sure when Lucas gets around to re-shooting the original trilogy using obi-wan from the first one (hey, there are only 10 more years to go more or less), the lightsaber fights will be much more involved.

      --
      Voting them all out of office, now that's change I can believe in.
  7. Re:The Curse of Star Wars by Tanktalus · · Score: 2

    You say that as if it were a bad thing. To have played a significant role in a universal epic of our time? Whether you liked the films or not, if you were born prior to ~1990, you have probably seen the films. Using that as a frame of reference allows of us who don't really pay attention to the credits to understand who this "Bob Anderson" person is and was, and thus understand his significance in our lives (even if that is "none, really").

  8. One's life's work by dtmos · · Score: 2

    It would be interesting to know what he considered to be his greatest professional achievement -- something he did in films, or representing Britain in the 1952 Olympics (where he finished around the median in the Men's Individual Sabre competition, and was on Britain's Men's Sabre Team, which finished tied for fifth place). Or maybe something else.

    Did he view his cinema work positively (e.g., in that he was "bringing fencing to the masses, who otherwise would never see it," or some such), or did he view the work as corrupting a purer art form, that he had to do to support his family? It would be interesting to have heard his thoughts on the matter.

    1. Re:One's life's work by sackbut · · Score: 4, Interesting
      He was very modest about his cinematic achievements and about all of his work. He was head of the Canadian Fencing Association/Federation when I was involved as an athlete at a national/international level. He very much viewed it positively and has been mentioned was a true 'champion' of the sport. He hooked many people on the sport of fencing, as a result of his choreography, teaching and administration he performed.

      As to "corrupting a purer art form": competitive fencing and fencing that looks good on film (to non-fencers) are completely different animals.

  9. Re:Meanwhile... by rossdee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Youknow I think that Dick Cheney is more like Palpatine than Vader

  10. Don't forget the man behind the mask by Anti+Cheat · · Score: 2

    Bob was a gentleman in every way. A hard working individual that gave much to the Canadian Olympic teams and individuals. A modest man that taught more than sword play and contributed much to the growth/maturity of many young people. Forever his film legacy will entertain and be enjoyed by many, but also many will remember his other gifts.
    My condolences to his wife and family. May he rest in peace.

  11. Re:Meanwhile... by JigJag · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Fun tidbit: in French, Darth Vader is named "Dark Vador", R2D2 is "D2R2", C3PO is "Z6PO"

    JigJag

    --
    "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
  12. Special edition by Sardaukar0 · · Score: 2

    Mr. Anderson's family was reportedly mortified when he reappeared at his own funeral as the blue sparkly ghost of Hayden Christensen.

  13. Re:Meanwhile... by formfeed · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fun tidbit: in French, Darth Vader is named "Dark Vador", R2D2 is "D2R2", C3PO is "Z6PO"

    JigJag

    With the strict language laws, shouldn't it be "Vader noir" ?
    (And all the other main characters un-postable on ASCII centric /. )

  14. correction on the sabers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The power cord was not for illumination - It powered a small motor that spun the blade, which was not round but triangular in shape. The wooden 'blade' was covered with 3M reflective material similar to what is used on road signs. The blades reflected available light from the studio key lights.

    And yes, they broke like crazy. Beginning with Empire they used aluminum rods that could take more contact.

  15. Re:Meanwhile... by JigJag · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see the invisible wink at the end of your question; true, there are very strong language laws... in Quebec! Other french-speaking countries are way more relaxed about it. For instance (one amongst thousands), Toy Story is called "Toy Story" in France but "Histoire de jouets" in Quebec.

    Translation is a challenge. When and how do you translate proper names? Why is the country whose capital is Berlin called Germany by the English, Allemagne by the French and Deutschland by its natives? And then why isn't Berlin translated three ways too?
    I recently did some independent translation for a popular '90s computer game (very heavy in dialog), and that was a serious question we asked ourselves. Do we translate names of places and people? We agreed that not all names ought to be translated but it was almost always based on a personal feeling.

    When it comes to movies, there is an added impetus: since the movies are dubbed and not voiced-over (like it was the case in Poland for so many years), the name chosen as a translation must be easy to pronounce yet they more or less must match the lip movements. The french can't pronounce "TH" properly, so DarTH is right out. On the other hand, the target audience is sufficiently sophisticated to know the word "Dark" and even have an idea of what it means (paradoxically, they get it wrong since they think "noir", like you pointed out, instead of "sombre"). Since his wardrobe matched the name, it made sense to use Dark in this case. So, there is aggregate of: 1) pronunciation, 2) ability to relate, 3) mental imagery that led to choosing "Dark Vador".

    Translation is more an art than a science. You need flair, inventiveness along with technique and rules.

    To me, the absolute best translation was that of Lady Jessica Atreides in Dune when examining the servants with Dr Yueh. In English, she says "When you said Harkonnens, I didn't know you had so much reason to hate them." In French, the translators used a verb tense rarely used in speech amongst commoners, but that perfectly embodied an educated and noble person like Lady Jessica: "Quand vous avez dit : 'Harkonnens'.. j'ignorais que vous eussiez tant de raisons de les haïr."
    You have to know French to be floored by that rendering. Not only the meaning was properly conveyed but as an added touch they established her rank through her language and it also coincide well with the lip movements. Grandiose.

    JigJag

    --
    "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang