Slashdot Mirror


Solo Explorer Begins Bicycle Journey To South Pole

Hugh Pickens writes "Helen Skelton, the first person to solo kayak the length of the Amazon, has set for herself another difficult task — to travel up to 14 hours a day battling 80mph winds and -50C temperatures 800km across Antarctica in an attempt to reach the South Pole by bicycle. It's no average ride, and Skelton, 28, is not using your average bike. Her specially-built Hanebrink 'ice bike' took designers in Los Angeles three months to finish. It features a seamless frame made of aluminium aircraft tubing, heat-treated to withstand harsh environments, and fat, tubeless, rubber tires designed to bulge over the rim to provide maximum stability and traction. The bike is designed to be as minimalist as possible, to make it aerodynamic and very low maintenance. 'The bike is designed specifically to cycle in soft snow or sand,' says polar guide Doug Stoup. 'We trained together in the desert this past summer. It helps because the temperatures are so cold the snow has little moisture and has a sand-like consistency.' Explorer Sir Ranulph Fiennes commends Skelton for taking on 'incredibly tough and grueling challenge.' 'Like Captain Scott, Helen is attempting something that has never been tried before and I applaud her pioneering efforts.'"

144 comments

  1. Follow-Up by DC2088 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Solo Explorer Cannot Tell You What It Was She Saw, It Was Too Horrible, Cannot Describe, Just Keep Flying Damn It

    1. Re:Follow-Up by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      She's not saying it was aliens... but it was aliens?

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    2. Re:Follow-Up by DC2088 · · Score: 2

      Solo Explorer Suddenly Terrified of Barrels, Penguins

    3. Re:Follow-Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    4. Re:Follow-Up by laejoh · · Score: 2

      Tekeli-li! Tekeli-li!

      I for one would use a Dornier Wal instead of a bike!

    5. Re:Follow-Up by P-niiice · · Score: 2

      They were infamous, nightmare sculptures even when telling of age-old, bygone things; for Shoggoths and their work ought not to be seen by human beings or portrayed by any beings.

    6. Re:Follow-Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love it when these get modded down. It tells me that I got at least one person. (o;

    7. Re:Follow-Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      RickRolling is a bit like Goatse, first you get used to it, then you learn to appreciate it.
      Have noticed that white fluff in the bottom left corner, what is it?

  2. A bike to the South Pole? by grub · · Score: 3, Insightful


    'Like Captain Scott, Helen is attempting something that has never been tried before and I applaud her pioneering efforts.'"

    I bet that won't be the only similarity between her and Scott...

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by durrr · · Score: 1

      Unforunately she'll be mummified and buried in ice so her last name is inappropriate.

    2. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      I'd compare her to Amundsen, rather than Scott, but that's just me.

    3. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Unforunately she'll be mummified and buried in ice so her last name is inappropriate.

      Enough windburn and she'll be a red Skelton.

      I'm certainly put off by the wind - when it hits about 20 knots it's some real work to go in. In the winds she'll be facing I can't imagine doing other than trying to simply stay in once place, without my bike being blown away - and these winds can go for more than 24 hours.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by tokul · · Score: 1

      I'd compare her to Amundsen, rather than Scott, but that's just me.

      Amundsen went low tec to South Pole. It was Scott's (or Shackleton's) f.... idea to use ponies and motor sledges. I don't think that Helen's bike is edible.

    5. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so, she's going solo, so she won't be able to eat any dogs on the way back.

    6. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by macraig · · Score: 2

      And she can't even justify her odd choice of a bicycle by merely quoting Edmund Hillary, either, because the bike wasn't there until she commissioned it to be built.

      I am mystified by people who do things just to be different and get attention, as opposed to solving a problem or serving a practical purpose.

    7. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roald_Amundsen It looks like scott attempted something 33 days after it already happened. booooooooooom

    8. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by MarkvW · · Score: 2

      Amundsen lived. Scott died. Shackleton required extraordinary skill and courage to overcome disaster.

      I wish the woman Amundsen's luck!

    9. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by timeOday · · Score: 2

      Yeah, "pioneering" ain't what it used to be. There's a big difference between being the first to go somewhere, vs. being the first to do so on a pogo stick. It's too bad space didn't turn out to be more useful.

    10. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by macraig · · Score: 2

      Space isn't useful, but the stuff that punctuates it certainly can be. It's just that space is BIG and there's no places to make pit stops... stop and build a fire and catch a wabbit or two for dinner. Crossing the oceans was once pretty hard because those pit stops were rare, but they still had air to breath, a magnetosphere and ozone layer overhead, and the medium itself wasn't immediately deadly. Space as a medium is just a wee bit more hostile. It's still necessary and worth it, but we'll need more desperation or vision to do it.

    11. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      Have you considered she might enjoy doing it? Seems like a good enough reason to me.

    12. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by macraig · · Score: 1

      No. This rockets way past enjoyment and into self-promotion. Given the expense and preparation involved, this is a job done for profit, not something done for fun. More to my point it's not in the least bit constructive except (perhaps) for the companies who are sponsoring her pointless venture. She's an advertising hack with a spin, nothing more.

    13. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by Kam+Solusar · · Score: 1

      I'd compare her to Byrd. Wilkins was the first to use aircraft on the continent, but Byrd was the first to fly over the south pole.

      --
      The Angels have the Phone Box
    14. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      without my bike being blown away

      Well, that's why the bike is being designed as highly aerodynamic, isn't? Let's hope that Miss Skelter is highly aerodynamic as well.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    15. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

      Wow, I've been a bit surprised by the criticism I've seen here. When I saw this I only thought "Getting to the pole: cool" "Riding bikes: fun and fast", so trying to combine the two just seemed like a nice idea. She's also intending to use kite skiing. It's not as impressive as trekking with less equipment, although equally it sounded like she's doing it alone, which is quite scary regardless. It will be interesting to see whether using this level of fairly basic technology helps, hinders or makes no difference.

    16. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind riding the first pogo stick into orbit. That would really be a claim to fame.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    17. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jealous?

    18. Re:A bike to the South Pole? by macraig · · Score: 1

      No. I love long distance cycling, but I hate being cold and gratuitous self-promotion disgusts me. Not jealous in the least.

  3. Design by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just a casual look at the picture of the bike makes me really wonder about the chain and sprockets on the back. They are totally exposed, and very low to the ground. Seems like they would be damaged on a chunk of ice pretty quickly.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd fully trust their design, what with all the snow and ice in LA

      I'd say this is going to be a trip through Helen back.

    2. Re:Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://surlybikes.com/bikes/pugsley No need to make a custom bike when an off the shelf model will do.

    3. Re:Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The new, even more over the top Moonlander might be more appropriate.

      http://surlybikes.com/bikes/moonlander

      4.7" wide tires. I'd give my first born to be able to justify owning one.

    4. Re:Design by Corf · · Score: 1

      The bike industry has had ample experience making stuff that holds up to getting bashed around. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqYgAX6D43Q

      --
      The pain was excruciating and the scarring is likely permanent, but that just means it's working.
    5. Re:Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd also question the assertion that the frame has no seams, unless it is cast or MIM or the like. If so, I can't figure how that would be an advantage over a traditional butted or welded Al frame.

      "Simple brakes" is also an hilarious callout, to describe what are likely off the shelf cable pulled calipers not significantly different in design from every bike in stock at Wal-Mart.

    6. Re:Design by jpapon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I imagine she'll have several chains and gears. Besides, I doubt ice will do much damage at the speeds she'll be going. Not to mention that chain and sprockets can actually be very strong (see chainsaws). The cold might make them brittle, but I imagine they've chosen appropriate materials.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    7. Re:Design by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Obviously you don't have much experience at 50 below zero (and no, I don't count the 'with the windchill' bullshit... try working at 50 below BEFORE factoring in the wind). Even metal parts break a lot easier if they aren't purpose built for the cold. So experience going down a hill at anything above zero Celsius does not prove anything about suitability at the temperatures she is going to encounter. I have worked in Manitoba with equipment designed and built in the southern half of the U.S. that was supposed to be suitable for arctic winters. I guess a lot of people down there don't get it. We had to do a bunch of modifications after we received the equipment (a gas analyzer shed) so that it wouldn't freeze up and quit. And Antarctica can make the arctic look like a trip to Cancun (ok a little hyperbole, but it is way harsher down south).

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    8. Re:Design by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      I came here to suggest the Moonlander, but you beat me to it. Surly is a good company that makes really good bikes.

    9. Re:Design by idji · · Score: 1

      she has 24 gears.

    10. Re:Design by CaptSlaq · · Score: 1

      Unrelated, but damn that kid can bomb.

    11. Re:Design by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      if you click "simple brakes" in the image, it explains they are used instead of hydraulic brakes (yes they do make them for mountain bikes) which might have issues w/ fluid freezing. So, yes they are "simple" in comparison to alternatives. Maybe they should have said mechanical. I wonder if they could have just gotten some antifreeze to the right viscosity and used it as a brake fluid.

    12. Re:Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the first people to winterise a mountain bike. Look up the Iditabike race.

    13. Re:Design by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      I'd also question the assertion that the frame has no seams, unless it is cast or MIM or the like. If so, I can't figure how that would be an advantage over a traditional butted or welded Al frame.

      I think they're talking about the tubes that the frame is made from. See under "seamless": http://sheldonbrown.com/gloss_sa-o.html

      "Simple brakes" is also an hilarious callout, to describe what are likely off the shelf cable pulled calipers not significantly different in design from every bike in stock at Wal-Mart.

      Well, yeah. That's the point. Cable-actuated brakes are reliable, and when they do break, they're much easier to fix in the field than hydraulic brakes. They don't have quite as much stopping power as hydraulics, but for a mostly flat ride, that won't be a problem.

    14. Re:Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here here! I'm from Manitoba, and have spent much time not particularly close to the USA border. Clothing in particular annoys me. If it wasn't designed specifically BY people in these temperatures, you can just about guarantee it'll be just about as useful as a wet tshirt. I'm sorry, your "polar" jacket or toque allows the wind to cut right through it like it wasn't even there. This is not a good design or make.

      Also, anything involving plastic. Unless it's damn well engineered specifically for this, you can absolutely guarantee it'll shatter like an egg if even slightly flexed. I'm looking at you, plastic decorative things on jackets or whatnot. You will crack and crumble away as if you were made of sugar.

      When I recently bought some snowshoes, after several tests I opted to go for the newer aluminum style ones. I had the options of getting cheaper ones made in the USA or China, or ones made in Canada. Guess which ones I got, and guess which ones haven't had even the slightest problem, even when snowshoeing for hours in -40 weather. I can't say for certain whether the USA or China ones would survive as well, but I figured I had a significantly better chance with the Canadian ones. The single only blemish on them so far is a warble in the plastic material between the aluminum tubing, where a branch slipped through there and snagged. Wrenching that thing around trying to get it un-caught at about -30 didn't leave even the slightest crack, or even discolour the pattern on the surface surprisingly. I had figured for sure I would have done serious damage. GV brand snowshoes... I may not be familiar with many other brands, but this is a brand I now trust to last.

      Long story short, you want something to last in -40 or below, you need it to be designed by people living and experiencing -40 and below.

    15. Re:Design by Corf · · Score: 2

      I sure don't. My comment was just as much an excuse to post that video as to contribute relevant discourse. But I put in a number of years in the bicycle industry. The better component manufacturers also do things for the aerospace industry; conditions fluctuating between sea level and a few dozen thousand feet probably do a number on equipment as well. The stuff is also likely a mite simpler and easier to re-engineer (if necessary) than a gas analyzer shed.

      Have a look at some of the photos that Hanebrink has posted. Seems to me like they know a thing or two about testing. It's in a wind tunnel, presumably a refrigerated one.

      If I had to guess, I'd figure the trickiest bit would be coming up with chain lube and bearing grease that weren't completely useless... and replacing a broken chain while wearing heavily insulated gloves.

      --
      The pain was excruciating and the scarring is likely permanent, but that just means it's working.
    16. Re:Design by hawguy · · Score: 2

      Just a casual look at the picture of the bike makes me really wonder about the chain and sprockets on the back. They are totally exposed, and very low to the ground. Seems like they would be damaged on a chunk of ice pretty quickly.

      Sometimes ease of accessibility trumps protection. Once on a bike tour, my riding partner snapped her chain and the loose chain got hung up in her chain guard. Normally a broken chain would be a 5 minute fix, we had a chain tool and some spare links. But it turns out that her chain cover screws were completely rusted tight - we stripped the screw heads trying to get them off.

      Fortunately, a passing motorist had a hacksaw so we just cut off the chain guard mounts, then it was an easy fix after that.

      For the snow bike, they may have decided that the extra weight and complexity of a chain guard that could cover a derailleur shifted chain wasn't worth it, and valued quick access to the chain over protection. It's already a 40lb bike.

    17. Re:Design by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I had a bike stolen, and replaced it with a Surly pacer with a Sram group on it. The thing kicks ass, by far the most versatile and comfortable road bike Ive ever ridden. I keep up with the racers and can ride a century plus with no lingering pains. I think my next bike will be the Karate Monkey.

    18. Re:Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had to guess, I'd figure the trickiest bit would be coming up with chain lube and bearing grease that weren't completely useless... and replacing a broken chain while wearing heavily insulated gloves.

      http://www.carbondrivesystems.com/

    19. Re:Design by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've only been to Canada twice. One time it was bastard cold, the other it was fucking freezing. And I originate from Yorkshire, so I'm not soft like them London twats who shut up shop if an inch of sodding snow falls, and then it's all over the news that the country has ground to a halt. Shandy drinking ponces.

      Where were we? Oh yes:

      What does a Canadian do when it gets to -30? He starts to shiver a bit.

      What does a Canadian do when it gets to -40? He thinks about putting a sweater on.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    20. Re:Design by timeOday · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't with pieces breaking, but with being fouled by ice. Ride a mountain bike in the mud and you will have such problems.

    21. Re:Design by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Pieces breaking, especially flexible plastic, is an issue. I've had the plastic sheaves on cables break in only -20. The biggest ice problem I've had in sub zero temperatures is icing on the rims on a bike with rim brakes (there's enough friction to heat the rims to melt the snow which later refreezes). Ice is much more of a problem around 0, in freezing rain conditions, but once she's away from the warm and wet coastal air the risk of freezing rain is slight.

      Snow is much easier to deal with than mud if there's no chance of it thawing and later forming ice, especially in a dry climate. It usually blows or brushes away, and it's very squishy, unlike the dirt and sand in mud. Snow/water/ice also doesn't mix into the lubricants, unlike dirt. Riding through dust is much harder on bike components than riding through snow.

      My biggest concern for her equipment would be using lubricants that don't become sticky in cold temperatures. I've had cables, axles, gearing, and the steering tube get stiff and difficult to move while riding in the cold.

      --
      Be relentless!
    22. Re:Design by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The coldest I ever had to work it was around 18 years ago, it was -48C on the thermometer outside our control room. The cold had affected a couple of our systems and our techs were dealing with them. Then we found out a feed mechanism on the roof our plant froze up due to a failure of a compressed air dryer. It wouldn't have been an issue on warmish days, but it was so cold it caused the moisture in the compressed air that normally would have been removed to condense in a control valve stopping an important operation. I actually ran the smelter from the control room. But, since all the techs were busy and I was essentially a SME on literally half the systems in the plant, I turned the place over to tech, and suited up like a spaceman, and climbed up the catwalks around 140 or 150 feet in the air... outside. Like I said, it was -48C without the wind. And there was wind too. It took me around a half hour to switch out a six way solenoid activated valve.

      Now here is the crux: what does a Canadian really do at -40C. He freezes his fucking bag off. Yeah we don't freak out, and dress for it, and essentially deal with it (usually without too much complaint.. it doesn't help and no one would listen to you if you did anyway), but really, it's fucking cold. Of course people brag about being tough, but really I have found that people who visit the tropics in the winter don't complain about it either. :) There are some things that do resonate with what you say though. IF there is no wind at 40 below... IF and only IF there is no wind what-so-fucking-ever, AND if you are working hard, you can actually make do with a light jacket. In fact IF you are working hard, it might be advised to wear a light jacket only. You will get overheated otherwise (overheating in sub zero cold is bad because once you stop what you are doing, any sweat that has soaked your clothes will freeze.. then you get hypothermia and die). I know, I've done that too. Chopping wood at a cabin at night at 40 below C on the thermometer with no wind. That goes for anyone. BUT, if there is even a 1km/hr wind, you would be frozen freakin solid if you dressed like that. This is why the 'feels like x degrees' windchill is such a load of shit designed by people in warmer climates so they can brag about how much cold they have experienced. Anyway in general, Canadians in really cold areas don't bitch about it because it is pointless. Better just to find things you can do and dress for it. Otherwise you WILL experience cabin fever after a while. Regardless of any mythbusters episodes, cabin fever is real.

      About that wind chill. In Winnipeg/Manitoba they used to broadcast the wind chill in terms of watt/m2 of extra heat lost from a body due to wind. It was on a logarithmic scale. 1200 was minimal don't worry about it. 1800 means a little nip on the nose or ears if you were out for a half hour to an hour with no hat. 2100 was hazardous, stay in. 2200 is insane. I remember a day when it was 30 below and with the wind, on the bullshit wind chill scale they said it felt like -40. The wind was around 8 km/hr. Remember I said you can work with a light jacket at -40 if there is no wind? You've probably figured with a wind even at 'only' 30 below C that it wouldn't be a good idea to wear a light jacket. Well on the other wind chill scale the value was 2450 W/m2. I had never seen it that high before. I remember the incident because weather Canada had just announced they were getting rid of the useful wind chill scale. The 'feels like' scale is actually dangerous if you ask me. So when they were broadcasting both, the comparison as to useful information delivered was mind boggling. Just remember the 'feels like' scale is horse shit. And dangerous when it really matters. The only saving grace is that normally the colder it gets, the less wind there is. But not always.

      Cold is cold. The colder the dryer the air. The dryer the air the more efficient the insulation in good winter clothing works. If you have to live in the cold you deal with it and find ways to enjoy things.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    23. Re:Design by dargaud · · Score: 1

      There's no ice on the ground in Antarctica as soon as you move away from the shore: only snow. And it's either mushy snow in some areas near the shore (~100km) or crusty snow with continuous sastruggi. Which lead me to say that their wheels are way too small. Even with boots with soles of the same surface area as their tires I was breaking the crust. We'll see how it goes, I wish them all the best in this great but unforgiving land, but I wouldn't bet on them.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    24. Re:Design by dargaud · · Score: 1
      I agree with the Canuck, the extreme cold changes everything. I have worked (or tried to anyway) at -78C (!!!). I'll add some other examples:
      • Most plastics become hard and brittle. The soles of the shoes (huge boots designed for the cold) would break if you jumped on something hard.
      • Normal electrical cabling turns to raw spaghetti and breaks to the touch.
      • Teflon electric cables, which don't break, don't conduct electricity properly anymore because their dielectric properties change ! After 1km you get half the voltage (~100V) you got at -40C.
      • Mechanical equipment break in unexpected places.
      • Your nose hair freeze all the way down your throat when you breath in.
      • You glasses cover in solid fog in less than a minute
      • You eyes freeze open if you don't wear glasses
      • Boiling tea in a 1L thermos freezes in less time than it takes you to reach your destination... Etc...
      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    25. Re:Design by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      You must be down south. Real down south.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    26. Re:Design by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      saw your link... read it on a mobile first time so missed... yeah like I thought.... antarctica. It doesn't get that flippin' cold anywhere else, even in Canada.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    27. Re:Design by Ramin_HAL9001 · · Score: 1

      Just a casual look at the picture of the bike makes me really wonder about the chain and sprockets on the back. They are totally exposed, and very low to the ground. Seems like they would be damaged on a chunk of ice pretty quickly.

      True. I would have avoided a chain drive all together. I would have a simple gearbox on the peddles, transfer power down a rotating shaft to a hub gear shifter on the rear wheel. Unless she is one of those people who really uses all 24 gear combinations on the sprocket cassettes, a 3-speed hub gear is all anyone will ever need... but I'm no pro.

  4. Well done BBC by martin · · Score: 1

    For keeping childrens TV interesting and alive and keeping the spirit of this long live tv programme going for over 53 years!

    this is a prime children's tv program doing a challenge to raise money for a charity called sport relief

    Well done and we wish Helen God speed

    1. Re:Well done BBC by dadioflex · · Score: 1

      We? As in you and the mouse in your pocket?

  5. Seamless? by Sez+Zero · · Score: 3, Informative

    The frame isn't seamless, the tubing that makes up the frame is seamless. The tubes join in distinct seams.

    After reading about and looking at it, it just looks like bike with fat tires.

    1. Re:Seamless? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually it looks like an old Tote Goat. (I can't believe there is a Wikipedia entry for those things....)

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Seamless? by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

      Well, it was a special deal - the tubes themselves were guaranteed to be seamless, and if she let them put just a few seams where the tubes joined, it was like getting 1/4 of the bike for free.

    3. Re:Seamless? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      (I can't believe there is a Wikipedia entry for those things....)

      This is the internet; one man's lack of interest (or even disgust) is another man's fetish ;-)

  6. solo? by spidercoz · · Score: 1

    she's gonna die

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    1. Re:solo? by digitig · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not solo. The summary doesn't say she's doing it solo, and the article tells you that she's one of a pair doing it.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    2. Re:solo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      One thing I've learned from cyclists is that they know so much more than we do. That's why, for instance, in Oregon there was a large effort to pass a law making it so that cyclists don't have to obey traffic stops -- their judgment about if they need to stop at intersections render stop lights and signs superfluous for them, and waste their time. I am quite sure she'll not only succeed, but have many great lessons to teach the people at stations near the south pole before they strap her to an iceberg and push her out to sea.

    3. Re:solo? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One thing I've learned from cyclists is that they know so much more than we do. That's why, for instance, in Oregon there was a large effort to pass a law making it so that cyclists don't have to obey traffic stops -- their judgment about if they need to stop at intersections render stop lights and signs superfluous for them, and waste their time. I am quite sure she'll not only succeed, but have many great lessons to teach the people at stations near the south pole before they strap her to an iceberg and push her out to sea.

      Really? I hadn't heard about that, that sounds like an excellent law.

      You trust car drivers, who are in a closed, partially sound proof box with large vertical obstructions in their field of view to be able to make that judgement when their car hood keeps them 4 - 5 feet behind the intersection, but you don't trust a cyclist who has a clear field of view and sense of hearing who is 18" from the intersection when he approaches to make the same decision?

      Often when I'm biking to an intersection, a car will pass me in the last 5 or 10 feet to the intersection, slow down, and proceed through the intersection before I even reach the stopping point. Did that driver really look carefully to decide if it was safe to go? If he did, then why do you think that I couldn't make that same decision in the same amount of time,even if I don't come to a complete stop? Plus, by not coming to a complete stop and unclipping from my pedals, I get through the intersection faster, so the approaching car from the side doesn't need to wait as long for me to clear it.

      A bike loses significant momentum when he comes to a full stop, and loses further time when he has to clip in again to proceed, *and* he has much more to lose if he makes the wrong judgement - if a car pulls out in front of a cyclist, the worst he'll face is some scratched paint. If a cyclist misjudges and pulls out in front of a car, he risks serious injury or death.

    4. Re:solo? by Convector · · Score: 1

      I feel certain that nobody at the south pole will be pushing anything out to sea, since it's over 1000 km away.

    5. Re:solo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worth the effort.

    6. Re:solo? by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rule of driving: Never assume that the other person will act in a safe manner. Because one of these days during the next 50 years of your driving life, they wont, and you will come out much better if you are prepared.

    7. Re:solo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize your post makes you exactly the kind of smug cyclist most other people want to strap to an iceberg and push in to near-freezing waters, right?

  7. Does anyone else find this pointless and idiotic? by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 0

    Or is it just me? I guess if she fails, she can go back to teaching tap dancing.... Oh, wait. We're back to that pointless thing again.

    Remind me again how this person merits any newsworthiness?

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  8. Right time of the year but... by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Doubt it will catch on as a summer vacation thing to do.

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    1. Re:Right time of the year but... by Hentes · · Score: 1

      It is summer there.

    2. Re:Right time of the year but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *woosh*

  9. Re:Does anyone else find this pointless and idioti by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Not any more silly than the team that wanted to ski down Mt. Everest.

  10. Re:Does anyone else find this pointless and idioti by cptdondo · · Score: 2

    Huh?! "Because it's there."

    Don't you ever want to know anything about the world outside of your mom's basement?

    I'm doing the Bataan Death March http://www.bataanmarch.com/ - me and a few thousand other people doing something utterly pointless. Just because we want to.

  11. And remember, if she makes it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares?!?

  12. Why has no one else spotted this... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1
    FTFA

    The Blue Peter presenter Helen Skelton

    I thought she was female. How is it she has a blue peter?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:Why has no one else spotted this... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      She just presents the blue peter, it's not actually hers.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:Why has no one else spotted this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er...

      "Blue Peter" is a UK childrens television programme.... (The world's longest running childrens television programme if wikipedia is to be believed - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_peter)

      So basically she's a children's TV presenter, and the expedition is pretty much supported by the BBC.

  13. Re:Does anyone else find this pointless and idioti by Baloroth · · Score: 2

    Maybe, but this is also much, much less awesome.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  14. Solo??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, there's a dude with her.

  15. Hey Helen... by htomc42 · · Score: 2

    If you happen to come across any ammo cans out there, would you please sign my id to the paper log inside? thanks!

  16. Why Compare her to Scott? by samoht · · Score: 2

    Do they expect that she won't make it?

    If it's a well planned, modern thinking, expedition, would seem to make more sense to compare her to Amundsen...

    Scott appears to have been very brave, but he also seems to have been stuck in the century old Royal Navy mindset of the nobility of man hauling during polar exploration. Amundsen seems to have studied the problem of polar exploration from a very young age and put this knowledge gained into designing a successful solution. He got there first, got there faster, and didn't lose a single man.

    --
    Terra Nova - a play about the race to the South Pole

  17. Explorer? by Dyinobal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I dunno when I think explorer I don't think of these stunts. Sure they are difficult to accomplish but I don't see much actual exploration in them. Exploration would be charting some previously uncharted caves, exploring space (star trek style) or something else. This solo bike ride, is more stunt worthy, record book worthy but I don't think she will be remembered as an explorer.

    1. Re:Explorer? by quietwalker · · Score: 2

      Gotta agree here. Not that what she's attempting isn't tough, but it's not being an explorer. If that was the case, then I'm an explorer, the first time I drove my pickup from my new home to work. That trek had never been made before, in that vehicle.

      It reminds me of the art scene where the quality of a painting is less important than whether or not it was made with saliva and blood, or framed on a toilet seat lid.

      At least it's all for charity.

  18. Not biking the whole way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't say she is biking the whole way, only part of the way. She's also skiing and sail-skiing.

    1. Re:Not biking the whole way by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      ..or if you read the updates, biking is actually the slowest way to get around!

  19. Yes it is idiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spent quite a few years working in the arctic. Every year we would have 'adventurers' trying to get to the North Pole. Usually they didn't make it. Sometimes they had to be rescued at great expense to the taxpayer.

    The only group we had much respect for were a group of Norse (iirc) who tried to ski from Greenland to Resolute. They did just about everything right except that they got lost on Ellesmere Island. Lucky for them they ran into the first RCMP patrol in thirty years; otherwise they were in big trouble.

    The person on the bicycle probably won't be as lucky.

    1. Re:Yes it is idiotic by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      Without knowing her preparations and physical ability, and the equipment she has with her it's hard to assess if it's "idiotic" or "inspiring".

      However, given that she's starting with a significant amount of resources she may be OK. We'll see in 20 days. Best of luck to her.

  20. Rescue costs? by PetiePooo · · Score: 2

    And who will be footing the costs of the rescue effort when things inevitably go pear-shared on this misguided publicity-hound?

    I'm just sayin'... be mindful of where your donations go.

    1. Re:Rescue costs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that is the first thing you think of, you are the one with problems.

      There probably won't be a rescue, some people are ok with that risk.

      There are other researchers down there, she can walk or ski for miles, there is plenty of fresh water everywhere, people can survive for days with rationing a little food (although it is harder in the cold)... it is cool, but I think she will be prepared for a lot of different scenarios.

    2. Re:Rescue costs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is plenty of fresh water everywhere

      As long as you have a heat source to melt it. There have been situations in Antarctic expeditions before where fuel shortages or poor rationing of fuel lead to dehydration.

    3. Re:Rescue costs? by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      The article clearly states that there's not much moisture in the snow, so I don't see how melting it would help anything. ;)

  21. Hanebrink ice bikes by smellsofbikes · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hanebrink's been building these bikes for almost two decades, although I've only seen one in person. These days Dan's making an electric-assist version of the bike. They have a bare minimum of plastic parts, which break in the cold. I don't know what he's using for tires these days but his first run were apparently done using knobby ATV tires that he'd ground the knobs off, which he described as a fairly unpleasant process. They also have a somewhat complex geartrain to give reasonable heel clearance from the chain, as well as reasonable speeds across a wide terrain profile.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:Hanebrink ice bikes by pz · · Score: 1

      Not sure about ATV tires per se, but shaving the top few mm of tread off of auto tires for racing purposes is standard stuff. There are machines specifically built for it that are not unlike large lathes. I can't imagine that ATV tires would be that different, so if someone describes it as an unpleasant process, they might not be using the right tools for the job.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    2. Re:Hanebrink ice bikes by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A lot of these kind of tires are hand-made because the machine is too big or too small to accommodate them, or the wheel they mount to. The tires used on the Top Gear Polar Challenge were hand-modified as well.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. rule 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, she's cute...

    1. Re:rule 30 by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      Wow, it took THAT long for someone to point out that she's cute? Congratulations Slashdot, this must be a new record.

  23. What's the point? by Lucas123 · · Score: 2

    I don't mean to come off as too cynical, but I mean, I can see being the first person to hike to the South Pole, fly to the South Pole -- heck even snowmobile to the to the Pole. But, what the heck is the purpose of biking to the Pole -- simply because it's yet another form of transportation? Maybe it's just me. I don't get it.

    1. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Now, if she was pogo-sticking or space-hoppering, that'd be a different kettle of fish.

    2. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's Blue Peter and it's for charity?

    3. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Blue Peter and it's for charity?

      blue peter is right

  24. Re:Does anyone else find this pointless and idioti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot regularly reports on the annual Darwin Awards, this seems to be a good attempt...

    I salute her other achievement though, kayaking the length of the Amazon is a feat of endurance, and a kayyak is an appropriate means of travel on a river..

    However traveling in the Antartic on bicycle is just stupid. How does she expect to cross crevasses, or carry enough food?

  25. I don't understand these stunts by jollyreaper · · Score: 2

    I can understand doing something really difficult with a lot of preparation. Bike across America? Cool. Walk across America? Cool. Crawl across America? Moonwalk across America? Walk on your hands across America? That goes beyond an interesting challenge to just bizarre.

    I can understand sailing across an ocean. I can even understand doing it solo. But trying to set a record for smallest boat or rowing? That just seems like trying to push beyond difficult to stupidly dangerous.

    I understand doing something for the challenge but there has to be a screw loose to do it for notoriety. Yeah, yeah, nobody will remember my name after I'm dead and she'll get her name in the history books whether she survives or not. In fact, she'll probably be remembered better if she does fail. Amelia Earhart surely owes a good deal of her current name recognition to not just how she lived but how she died. I guess if fame's that important to you, have at it.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  26. Well it is summer down there by Tangential · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for the follow-on where she does it in the winter.

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
  27. Skiing would be easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She should stick with the tried and proven method of cross country skiing. Biking is a lot less energy efficient especially given all of the friction caused by the dry powdery snow. This is a big deal because exerting more energy burns more calories and creates more sweat. All that dampness unless vented properly will make a person miserable. More food and water will be needed than normal. Biking into the wind is also a lot harder than skiing would be, plus it's uphill all the way. If it was packed snow and ice most of the way she might be okay. I've mountain biked through the mountains before in the middle of winter mostly on snowmobile tracks. Even with fat tires there will be some sinking which amounts to a lot of wasted energy. Skis also provide more protection from falling into a crevasse at least the ones with smaller openings. Unless she's tried something like the Admundsen Scott Southpole Trek before she's in an unfamiliar and very hostile environment. I don't think she knows what she's getting herself into.

  28. How does the bike taste . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    I mean, usually when these quests go wrong, the adventurers eat the sled dogs. So is she going to eat her bike?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  29. Gears need a redesign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've smashed several rear derailleurs when mountain biking. In many ways they are great. They are easy to maintain and easy to swap if they break but they are totally exposed and originally designed for cycling on roads. I wouldn't use them on a trip to the south pole. (If I really had to go there I would use dogs but that's another issue.)

    1. Re:Gears need a redesign by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Internal gearing has become more and more popular for offroad use but in this case I think simplicity is more important. It's easy to replace a broken derailleur and I don't think she's going to be pedaling through rock gardens or doing monster drops.

    2. Re:Gears need a redesign by Kam+Solusar · · Score: 1

      in this case I think simplicity is more important.

      Especially at -40C with strong winds and pretty thick gloves on.

      --
      The Angels have the Phone Box
  30. What's this going to cost us if she fails? by trikster2 · · Score: 1

    When/if things go wrong....

    Who pays for the rescue (or body recovery) effort?

  31. Helen Skelton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an amazing name. That is all.

  32. Who Really Foots the Bill? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    So.. who is paying for her rescue? And are they volunteers who are willing to risk their life to save some chick out on a whim?

    1. Re:Who Really Foots the Bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So.. who is paying for her rescue? And are they volunteers who are willing to risk their life to save some chick out on a whim?

      Yeah ... they are. All guys, too. Have you SEEN her?

    2. Re:Who Really Foots the Bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bbc and their insurance company.

  33. I routinely cycle in the snow and -20F weather by unimacs · · Score: 2

    I live in Minnesota and ride 6 miles to work year round in all weather and have gone winter camping where we slept under the stars for a weekend in -15F. I'm very intrigued by the design of this bike and would LOVE to try one here. Typical mountain bikes are a ton of work to pedal through even a few inches of snow, - at least the type of snow we get in these parts.

    Somebody has already mentioned the Surly Pugsley and while it's a fine machine it has its limitations. If the snow isn't fairly firm, it's worse than a conventional bike. You end up pushing 4 inches of tire through the snow instead of 2.

    An ultra-wide, small diameter tire like the ones they're using make a lot of sense. More float without all the extra weight of a large diameter tire. They mentioned the aerodynamics of the bike but it doesn't look like they've done much in that department other than adding aero bars.

    Clothing and supplies will be a huge deal. She's going be traveling mostly under her own power and working hard. Her clothing needs to be able to wick sweat effectively while still keeping the wind out. She'll also need a lot of water and need to consume a lot of calories. Does she have a support team supplying her?

    Good Luck to her !

    1. Re:I routinely cycle in the snow and -20F weather by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      The aerodynamics (and weight) on a Hanebrink are *horrendous* -- but with a tire like that, and over terrain like that, you're not going to be anywhere near the speeds at which that matters. (For bikes the crossover is usually in the 12-20 kilometers per hour range, below which your power is mostly going to fighting friction, and above which it's mostly going to pushing air aside.) Those aero bars are mostly going to be of use to her for changing hand and body positions. I've done 100+ mile and multi-day rides on mountain bikes and they're murder in part because of always having your hands/arms/body in one position.
      Your point with the tires is well-taken. If you don't go wide enough to float on top of the snow you just add more rolling resistance, and in order to float on the snow you have tires that no longer fit in a typical frame. (Hence Hanebrink's ultrawide-stance frames.) I've ridden Pugsleys and the like that can float over wet sand but are still unpleasant in dry fine sand, and are miserable in powder. Some day I'd love to try a Hanebrink. I'd also love to make my own, only make a pedal-powered quad with reasonably balloony tires so it could float as well. (Of course, at that point it starts becoming more attractive to just go ahead and make a hovercraft like Steam Boat Willie.) But generally I prefer a cyclecross tire over a huge fat wide tire in most somewhat-deep-snow conditions precisely because it'll cut through and give me some traction with much lower rolling resistance.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    2. Re:I routinely cycle in the snow and -20F weather by unimacs · · Score: 1

      I agree that she's probably not going to be moving fast enough that speed alone will make aerodynamics very important. However, they talked about the high winds alot, so even if she's not moving fast, a stiff headwind will still make riding position (and aerodynamics in general) matter.

      It just seemed strange that they talked about the aerodynamics of the bike and it doesn't look like they really did anything at all in that regard other than internal cable routing. They even did wind tunnel testing but I think it was more about getting her positioned as optimally as possible. However, if they really cared about aerodynamics, they would have come up with some sort of recumbent with a fairing.

    3. Re:I routinely cycle in the snow and -20F weather by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Fairing, yes, but recumbents are *terrible* off-road. I can ride my cannondale mountain bike over a ford taurus sedan. My HPVelotechnik recumbent can hold 28 miles an hour for most of the day but can't even handle crossing a curb unless it's basically perpendicular (and even then it's pretty unpleasant.) Not to mention: have you ever pushed a recumbent? It's *awful*. And she's going to be spending a lot of time pushing her bike. For flat paved roads recumbents are unequalled, but for offroad rough conditions mountain bikes are pretty amazing.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    4. Re:I routinely cycle in the snow and -20F weather by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      I've heard that full-suspension recumbents are better at such things as curbs. The editor of www.autospeed.com built a nice one.

    5. Re:I routinely cycle in the snow and -20F weather by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      The HPVelotechnic is fully suspended. Previous to it I had a Turner SWB, that had no suspension. After a 100 mile ride I thought I was going to piss blood. That's why it went away and the HPVelo showed up. It's this bike. It only has about 40mm of front suspension travel, which curbs soak up entirely (and then some.) I've never seen a recumbent that had enough suspension travel to handle a curb without bottoming out. In contrast, on the mountain bike or my road racing bike, I can bunnyhop the bike up/over a 40cm ledge smoothly, with the only jostle being the slight bump of landing again. Each frame geometry has its advantages, but for rough territory, the mountain bike just *shines*. (Although if you want to see something amazing, check out this video of a dude doing pretty astounding observed trials riding on a carbon road bike. It gets good about 40 seconds in.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  34. Where's /. user "icebike"? by Maow · · Score: 1

    Where's /. user "icebike"? I need his / her thoughts on this.

  35. Re:Does anyone else find this pointless and idioti by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 1

    That's *awesome!!* *I* want to ski down Mt. Everest!

  36. Re:Does anyone else find this pointless and idioti by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

    I'm the first one on board the "Because it's there!" trip, but in this case, I'm less impressed. What's next - first trip to the South Pole in a Unicycle? Walking backwards? While doing a three-legged race?

    Do it because you want to, not because you want to get your name in a record book by altering some small part of the original record.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  37. I've seen this before... by atari2600a · · Score: 1

    It's a Honda monkey bike reproduction, except gutted & made out of aluminum instead of steel...

  38. Antarctica != Playground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we are allowing stunts on Antarctica? This annoys me, do it somewhere else, Antarctica is a very important continent for science and the future of the earth and beyond, it is not a fucking playground. And to anyone who says "it's for charity", you are an idiot, it is a fucking stunt. Plain and simple.

  39. Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...who will be the first Black Lesbian to drag a cinderblock there?

  40. From someone who knows by bigwheel · · Score: 1

    Here http://arcticglass.blogspot.com/2012/01/south-pole-on-bike.html is the opinion of a gal who is very familiar with cold weather endurance riding. Snow riding has become very popular sport in Minnesota. Surly, Salsa, 9:zero:7, FatBack, Moots, and others all make bikes specifically for snow. None of them look like the one that Ms Skelton will be riding.

  41. Blue Peter ups the ante by illtud · · Score: 2

    I really don't get the "she's going to die" comments; this is Blue Peter - a UK (middle class, losing audience) BBC kids' show. There will be tens of thousands of kids following her attempt, she'll have scads of logistical support. If she gets into real difficulties, don't be suprised if Prince WIlliam flies her out, she's in no way doing this 'solo'. She is really doing it (though not cycling all the way, as I understand) but you really don't get a high-profile BBC presenter putting her life at risk in front of kids. Although they've done really risky things in the past (those of you who thought that John Noakes was just a humourous character should read up) by now there's no chance that the BBC would be taking a serious risk,but those of you who think this is a suicide mission or doomed to fail can look forward to watching the kid-friendly "it was really hard but worth it" episodes later on, (or possibly the "she broke a leg and was airlifted out 100 miles out").

    Nobody's going to be seeing a Blue Peter death here, that's just for the pets. And good on Blue Peter for showing young girls that they can aspire to something other than X-Factor (though I think it's pointless, same as with all other ''explorer' antics, other than as a personal goal).

  42. Seven degrees of separation ... by 517714 · · Score: 1

    Assuming she gets from 83 deg south to her goal.

    --
    The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  43. derailleurs are actually very fragile by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    ...which is why there's a soft-metal tab that attaches them to the frame, called a derailleur hanger. It doesn't take much at all to bend them, and the derailleur is also pretty fragile, in general. The more gears you have on the rear cassette, the more precise everything has to be. Having the chain exposed like that, and using a derailleur/cassette, is pretty stupid. Ask anyone who commutes in the winter; it's all going to clog up and stop working. They should have gone with an internally-geared hub (with suitable oil for the temperatures) and a full chaincase covering the chain. She's going to have issues with snow and ice getting everywhere, in the cables and more. Won't be much she can do about it, either, at those temperatures.

  44. It's a joke by RoLi · · Score: 1

    She starts at 83 South, need I say more?

    1. Re:It's a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She starts at 83 South, need I say more?

      Agreed. The pair are only starting from 83 degrees south. Why not start at 89 degrees south and claim this mile-stone? Both start-points are equally pointless.

      The golden age of explorers all started from the coast. Now this would be a noteworthy achievement.

      Also, why would Helen claim to be first if she's taking a guide the whole way? What a load of who-ha!!!

  45. Ice? It's too cold. by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

    I don't know if others actually read the article, but with an average temp of -26C, there isn't going to be much thawing happening, and so there won't be much ice...i got the distinct impression that it's exceptionally "dry" there.

    Sure, snow will be whipping around, but it's not particularly tenacious. I'd agree more with the other comments of parts busting because they're not designed to withstand this environment...although the torque from a human isn't really that great, and especially so in this case given the mantra appears to be "sweat is death". She'll be pedalling at a pretty easy pace.

    As a fairly serious cyclist, i think i'd have opted for something more like one of the Surly bikes also linked to in this thread...bigger wheels allow for much faster travel as well...i don't think even kids bikes have wheels with a diameter as small as what the bikes in the article have!

  46. Re:Does anyone else find this pointless and idioti by dbIII · · Score: 1

    No.
    Weight is a massive factor in polar expeditions and the experience gained in this trip could help a lot for those places where the best option now is to drop the group and their equipment by helicopter.
    IMHO it's no more pointless than racing cars and getting a few nice side benefits as gravy every now and again.

  47. This story is wildly inaccurate. by slampman · · Score: 1

    She's not solo.
    The bikeS are only being used a minority of the time - apparently they did 40+ miles today kite skiing.

    See: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/8992225/Helen-Skeltons-Polar-Challenge-begins.html
    And current updates: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/activityandadventure/8969960/Helen-Skeltons-Polar-Challenge-the-latest.html

    I do find the (real) story super interesting.

  48. Stupid - in a good way. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  49. pogo stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    won't be cool until done with a pogo stick

  50. Not biking the entire way by Sere · · Score: 0

    Summary's a bit misleading, as they're walking, biking, and kiting the way there. Doesn't explicitly say if it's an unsupported run, but it's kind of implied especially for a one-way trip with a plane back.

    Different beast entirely from what Scott did.

  51. Next up, Tunneling to Java by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

    Does this remind anybody else of this Monty Python Sketch: http://www.montypython.net/scripts/tunnel.php

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  52. Re:Does anyone else find this pointless and idioti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm doing the Bataan Death March http://www.bataanmarch.com/ - me and a few thousand other people doing something utterly pointless. Just because we want to.

    Dunno if it's pointless, but I find the idea of walking 26 miles to commemorate the Bataan Death March -- and giving out awards to the top finishers! -- to be rather insulting, or at least tasteless. It's sort of like commemorating the Holocaust by filling a sealed room full of helium and pinning a medal on whoever gets the squeakiest voice. "He who saves one life saves the...hey, I sound like Teresa Ganzel!"

  53. Re:Does anyone else find this pointless and idioti by Jerry+Atrick · · Score: 1

    OK, can't expect a colonial to know she's a TV presenter on childrens programme "Blue Peter" and part of the job description is doing this sort of stunt. Or to notice the BBC are getting 9 weeks of possibly inspiring kiddies TV out of it. Can't even expect you to recognise the name 'Sport Relief' at the end of the article.

    But completely missing the charity fund raising aspect (the Sport Relief bit)? You didn't read the article did you?

    Lot's of reasons she's doing this, getting her name in the record books AGAIN is the least of them.

  54. the bicycle already exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a surly moonlander