Slashdot Mirror


Kodak Failing, But Camera Phones Not To Blame

An anonymous reader writes with this snippet from The Conversation: "According to the Wall Street Journal, camera manufacturer Kodak is preparing to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, following a long struggle to maintain any sort of viable business. The announcement has prompted some commentators to claim that Kodak's near-demise has been brought on by: a failure to innovate, or a failure to anticipate the shift from analogue to digital cameras, or a failure to compete with the rise of cameras in mobile phones. Actually, none of these claims are true. Where Kodak did fail is in not understanding what people take photographs for, and what they do with photos once they have taken them." Continues the reader: "Looking at camera data from Flickr, of images uploaded in 2011, camera phones only make up 3% of the total. Dedicated cameras from Canon, Nikon and yes, Kodak were used to take 97% of the images. What Kodak failed to understand is that people have switched from taking photos for remembering and commemorative reasons to using photos for identity and communication. The shift changes the emphasis away from print to social media platforms and dedicated apps."

5 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. Re:bad data source by cultiv8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    What Kodak shoulda done is patented their technology, that's how you create something and then not innovate but yet profit from it. *runs, ducks*

    --
    sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
  2. Re:Poor analysis - its film not the camera itself by kurt555gs · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just like "sexting" replaced Polaroid.

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
  3. Re:bad data source by sunspot42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    over one beeeellion dollars

    That joke wasn't very funny when a painfully unfunny Canadian made it in a teeth grindingly unfunny movie 10+ years ago even though there it was at least in context. It hasn't matured with age to become funny since then.

    Oh, behave!

  4. Re:Poor analysis - its film not the camera itself by swalve · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, an easy way to see an impossible color is to watch the David Letterman show. On his set, there are a number of things painted in a burgandy/maroon color. If you let that color burn into the retina for a while, when you close your eyes, you get a blue green that's just awesome.

  5. Re:Poor analysis - its film not the camera itself by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe he works at Kodak.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)