What Does Sunset On an Alien World Look Like?
The Bad Astronomer writes "Using real data from Hubble Space Telescope of a planet orbiting another star, exoplanetary scientist Frédéric Pont created a lovely image of what sunset would look like from HD209458b, nicknamed Osiris, a planet 150 light years away. The Hubble data gave information on the atmospheric absorption of this hot Jupiter planet, and, coupled with models of how the atmosphere was layered, Pont was able to create a realistic looking sunset on the planet. The big surprise: the star looks green as it sets! Sodium absorption sucks out the red colors and blue is scattered away, leaving just the green hues to get through. It's a lovely application of hard scientific knowledge."
...they get overloaded servers there too. :P
it's located someplace that we're not going to be able to verify the results.
The laws of physics work the same way there that they do here...you don't actually have to go there to know how light will pass through the atmosphere...
For a while. Have a little faith, we'll get there some day. Or at least our distant descendants.
Only if these aliens use the same light spectrum as we do, and use the same photo standard as we do.....and if and only if they actually SEE with the same organs as we do.
It looks to me like the sunset has a striking resemblance to a 500 error.
It looks like an Internal Server Error? I would have thought it would be more interesting than that. The more things change, the more they remain the same.
I don't know, but it works for me.
We are talking about how a star (which we can clearly measure) interacts with an atmosphere (which, again, we can clearly measure). Nothing as small or dark as Pluto needs to be measured to figure out what the "sunset" looks like. Comparing the two is highly specious. Not being able to directly image a dark, tiny rock is a lot different to being able to detect the atmosphere of a planet and the output of a (relatively) very bright star.
I guess it's best to leave this stuff to the professionals ;)
Unless vernor vinge was correct
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Fire_Upon_the_Deep
No one knows what Pluto looks like, but somehow we know what another planet looks like from hundres/thousands of lightyears away? Makes no sense to me.
If you'd bothered to look at the picture before posting you'd know there's no 'planet' in it.
You don't even have to read this one, just look at the picture.
No sig today...
it's located someplace that we're not going to be able to verify the results.
The laws of physics work the same way there that they do here...you don't actually have to go there to know how light will pass through the atmosphere...
Not exactly... all I get are Server 500 errors. That's not what I pictured an alien sunset looking like.
The cesspool just got a check and balance.
The laws of physics work the same way there that they do here
That is a metaphysical assumption of physics, not an observed fact. We won't know that for sure until we go there.
Of course...it is probably true.
Indeed; they could easily figure out what a sunset would look like on one of Jupiter's moons by sending a probe. But the picture wouldn't look like what was predicted by computer model; I've never seen two sunsets that were exactly alike. Latitude, temperature, air pressure, etc -- there are too many variables. When I was stationed in Thailand in the Air Force I saw what I would have thought were breathtakingly beautiful sunsets at a certain time of year that contained all the colors there were, including green. You don't get sunsets like that this far north.
Free Martian Whores!
Sadly, the image seems to be obscured by smoke from the smoldering server.
Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
I've always been too in busy in the back seat of a car with some alien babe parked at the viewpoint when they happen.
- Captain Kirk
Have gnu, will travel.
Yeah, yeah, or look up the first one in a cache. The second link has the same pretty pictures as the first, but the first one is actually written by the guy who did the work.
The laws of physics work the same way there that they do here...
And your proof is ... ?
You can't draw any conclusions at all without that assumption. It's nearly as fundamental as assuming that there's an objective observable universe at all...
"Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
Seriously, learn a little about optics, spectroscopy, and remote sensing. Conceptually, what this guy did isn't even that hard to comprehend, though actually working the problem isn't easy at all. We certainly have ways of telling (within a confidence interval) what is going on. Is it perfect? Of course not, and I'm sure it would look different in reality. But I'd bet good money (sadly, neither you nor I will live to see ground truth) that it's fairly close.