Slashdot Mirror


$10M Tricorder X PRIZE Kicks off

Back in May, we heard about Qualcomm's plans to hammer out details for an X PRIZE competition to invent a Star Trek-style tricorder. Now, reader Sven-Erik sends word that the requirements have been finalized and the competition has launched. "As envisioned for this competition, the device will be a tool capable of capturing key health metrics and diagnosing a set of 15 diseases. Metrics for health could include such elements as blood pressure, respiratory rate, and temperature. Ultimately, this tool will collect large volumes of data from ongoing measurement of health states through a combination of wireless sensors, imaging technologies, and portable, non-invasive laboratory replacements. Given that each team will take its own approach to design and functionality, the device's physical appearance and functionality may vary immensely from team to team. Indeed, the only stated limit on form is that the mass of its components together must be no greater than five pounds."

26 of 111 comments (clear)

  1. I'm making an Android app... by FlopEJoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    You start it up and it prints: "It's Lupus"

  2. i'm going to win. by notgm · · Score: 5, Funny

    i'm building an ER in a zeppelin.

    1. Re:i'm going to win. by manoweb · · Score: 2

      Apparently they specified mass, not weight :)

    2. Re:i'm going to win. by Great+Gravy · · Score: 2

      I hope the er Zeppelin plays "Sick Again" when it finds something wrong.

    3. Re:i'm going to win. by BoberFett · · Score: 2

      Oh the humanity!

    4. Re:i'm going to win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not so. There are two systems:

      pounds (force) and slugs (mass)

      poundals (force) and pounds (mass)

      The first is the more common.

  3. Does it have to make the sound? by ciderbrew · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope it has to make the sound.
    /or it could go ping; but it wouldn't be the same.

    1. Re:Does it have to make the sound? by nine-times · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it can't go "ping". That's one of the requirements for the X-Prize for the Timey-Wimey detector: goes "ping" when there's stuff.

    2. Re:Does it have to make the sound? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      How about "Bing" or is that still under (C) by Monty Python?

      No, Microsoft.

    3. Re:Does it have to make the sound? by JSC · · Score: 2

      No one expects the Bing inquisition!

      --
      Time's fun when you're having flies. - Kermit the Frog
  4. Re:NASA, is that you? by tag · · Score: 4, Informative
  5. sound too? by almostadnsguy · · Score: 2

    Does it also have to make that 1960's cool StrarTrek sound?

  6. Innovation by Tyr07 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Events like this are really great, it really spurs innovation.

    It encourages people to think outside the box and build something normally only researched if there's great market value. If companies are making fair change with current products, they'll milk research till later and slowly release tech to keep the market at the right level of saturation.

    The fact that a reward to cover research expenses and advance technology like that is just out there is great. It might not be perfect, whatever is developed, but it's a start in a good direction. It might not be a mass marketed product, the original anyway, but that 10 mill will at least get the ball rolling.

    1. Re:Innovation by ae1294 · · Score: 2

      My entry is ready now. It's a hollowed out brick of lead with a flap on one side and a display screen painted on the other. The screen reads 'acute radiation poisoning'. The devices inner working are a trade secret.

    2. Re:Innovation by MickLinux · · Score: 2

      Nonsense. The trick is to find standard technologies that can read and predict diseases.

            (1) Laser or infrared thermometer. Check.
            (2) Some form of paper chromatography tests. Get 'em from your hardware store. Check.
            (3) Various voltage electrode readings. Have your doctor give you an EKG in the standard physical, and take home with you the electrodes. Check.
            (4) A videocamera, an optical fine-focus camera, and a lenseless PenCam camera with interchangeable filters, to view the body at different wavelengths, including IR, or to finely examine such things as the eyes.
            (5) A twisted wire thermometer, and a mirror-vapor hygrometer, to measure water vapor emitted.
            (6) A couple of various speakers and microphones, one to listen to normal frequencies (like breathing, talking), and a couple others for sound imaging.
          (7) Lots and lots of programming. Ideally the tricorder should talk to the person, and listen to their answers, including such things as, "what seems to be the problem?" to get symptoms that it can look up.

          It seems to me all these things are easily available, and could be incorporated. I suspect that the 15 diseases will include some easy ones, and some very hard ones. One just has to beat the other tricorders. One doesn't have to solve every problem.

          My guess is that a team that included a CNA nurse, an RN, a family doctor, an electronics whiz kid, and about 5 programmers, probably could come up with the winning solution.

          Also, don't forget that you can use patented technologies (such as the chromatography) as long as you buy it from the store. You *do* have to find a way to sequentially test and pull them.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  7. About time by paleo2002 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This sounds great and all, but it seems a shame that they've got to bribe people into developing such a device. A portable, multi-purpose medical diagnostic tool isn't sufficiently desirable on its own? You'd think something like this would have been in development for years already.

    1. Re:About time by PPH · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dammit Jim! I'm a doctor, not a venture capitalist!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  8. Cellphones by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why dedicated tricorders if you have cellphones? Carrying an "intelligent" device with a lot of "awareness" already (accelerometers, magnetometers, gps, etc), adding them a few more that take existing input (i.e. measuring elements in breath when you are answering a call, or from your hand when you are holding it) should not be that hard. The key here is more to make compact enough sensors to that kind of use. Of course, you can have also devices on your body taking measurements and communicating with the phone by bluetooth too.

  9. *medical* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    *medical* tricoder they mean.

  10. Already made this... by tekrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    But, it diagnoses everyone who's ever even HEARD of a "tricorder" with A.D.D.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  11. Hundreds of million$ already on just glucose by michaelmalak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wikipedia's article on Noninvasive glucose monitor:

    Hundreds of millions of dollars have been invested in companies who have sought the solution to this long-standing problem, and the search has been peppered with false starts, premature announcements of success and outright chicanery on the part of some investigators. However, most of the researchers in this field have been genuinely interested in helping those with diabetes find a less painful and more convenient way to measure their blood glucose.

    Approaches that have been tried include near infrared spectroscopy (measuring glucose through the skin using light of slightly longer wavelengths than the visible region), transdermal measurement (attempting to pull glucose through the skin using either chemicals, electricity or ultrasound), measuring the amount that polarized light is rotated by glucose in the front chamber of the eye (containing the "aqueous humor"), and many others.

    And that's just one parameter. A useful tricorder would cost billions of dollars to make, not just $10 million.

  12. Boy, do I have news for you... by denzacar · · Score: 2
    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  13. Re:Complete waste of effort.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Asking people what's wrong with them isn't exactly an unbiased way of finding out what's really wrong with them. Their knowledge is full of errors (as it's reliant upon their memory, which is severely flawed), and they may not even feel things that are wrong with them. We need a way of doing a star trek-style scan of them to find out what's really wrong with them, instead of wasting time with their hypochondriacal problems.

    As for taking someone's weight, you really think that asking people what they weigh is an accurate way of getting that information? I guess surgical centers should just take out their high-precision scales (used to get the patient weight right before surgery so the anesthesiologist can calculate the correct dosage so they don't kill the patient), and just ask the people what they weigh instead!! If a patient's home scale is off by 10%, or they don't want to admit to themselves that they're really 200 pounds and instead say they're 160, that'll be OK, right?

    Even family medical history isn't very good data. A patient may be adopted, or a patient may not realize that the person who he believes is his father actually isn't (studies have shown that something like 10-15% of people were fathered by someone else; i.e., the mother had an affair and never told anyone). So the patient might be worried because all his relatives on his "father's" side have some condition and thinks he'll have it too, but he's actually not biologically related.

    With semiconductor-based DNA scanning right over the horizon, yes, we should be working to build an MRI, centrifuge, and DNA lab into a five-pound box, and not waste time trying to make an accurate diagnosis with someone saying "my leg hurts!".

  14. Re:Complete waste of effort.... by Fnord666 · · Score: 2

    I agree. Working in an MRI environment, some people have piercings in the usual places (genital area, nipple) and then discreetly ask one person accompanying them something about it but not mention it on their screening forms.

    I assume you can guess what is pierced from the pitch of their screaming?

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  15. Re:Complete waste of effort.... by jkyrlach · · Score: 2

    Sure, the patient is biased, but the information they have is still valuable. I have never been to the dr where they didn't ask me questions. A Dr. is good at weeding out red herrings, knowing where to get clarification, which statements to get clarification on. Sure, patients lie, but technology is not a great solution for that problem. Will your tricorder really be bale to see that they really do use drugs or really are an alcoholic? Be realistic guys. I was just trying to say that as far as the basic indicators -- weight, height, blood pressure, temperature -- we have good enough tech already. Unless this contest is going to produce a box that does the magical thing that a tricorder can do, ie MRI in a box, then I think we could advance the medical profession much further by focusing on things like Watson.

  16. Climate Change... by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    The word "tricorder" is a portmanteau of "tri-" and "recorder", referring to the device's three default scanning functions: GEO (geological), MET (meteorological), and BIO (biological).

    Not sure what the Geological setting might say.