Slashdot Mirror


Man Charged With Stealing Code From Federal Reserve Bank

wiredmikey writes "A Chinese computer programmer was arrested by U.S. authorities in New York on Wednesday, on charges that he stole proprietary source code while working on a project at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The man arrested, Bo Zhang of New York, worked as a contract employee developing a specific portion of the GWA's (Government-Wide Accounting and Reporting Program) source code at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York where the code is maintained. The complaint alleges that in the summer of 2011, Zhang stole the GWA code, something he admitted to in July 2011. Zhang said that he used the GWA Code in connection with a private business he ran training individuals in computer programming."

130 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Lesson 1 by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't steal from the government - it hates the competition

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Lesson 1 by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fed is not part of the government. Its a private entity controlled by the members.

    2. Re:Lesson 1 by redmid17 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The people who run the Fed are largely appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate

    3. Re:Lesson 1 by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Fed is as close to godhood as one gets in public life. You only serve for fourteen years (unlike federal judges), but you also make the money. I suppose the Fed could be abolished, but short of that, you're pretty much set.

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    4. Re:Lesson 1 by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Fed is not part of the government. Its a private entity controlled by the members.

      You mean all that paper money I keep in my pillow, mattress and bags in my closet with ' Federal Reserve Bank' are not issued by the actual Department of the Treasure, a cabinet position below the US President, but some private firm?!?

      I've been swindled! I'm going to complain about this as soon as I finish throwing away my pillow, mattress and all those heavy bags. >:(

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Lesson 1 by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Don't steal from the government - it hates the competition

      I realize that you are joking. But it makes me wonder why so many on /. would consider this "stealing". Especially when the majority will argue the semantics of stealing when it's regarding music or entertainment data. Less than three hours prior to this,the Megaupload story has many defending piracy. Granted, the ramifications of people being arrested outside of the US for piracy is scary. But still, what's the difference between the bits that were taken for the banking code and bits taken for entertainment?

    6. Re:Lesson 1 by hedwards · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Federal Reserve does not print or issue money. Never have and hopefully never will. Those bills are printed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing and the coinage is minted by the United States Mint.

      The Federal Reserve only puts them into circulation when the Board of Governors authorizes it to do so. It is a bit complicated, but the Federal Reserve itself is a private entity that happens to have a board of publicly appointed figures.

    7. Re:Lesson 1 by icebraining · · Score: 2

      He had a contract with the organization from whom he copied the code, which (implictly or explicitly) covers that he couldn't do this.

      People downloading from Megaupload haven't signed anything agreeing not to copy such files.

    8. Re:Lesson 1 by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Board of Governors are appointed by the President and their salaries are set by the govt, but the input with which the Fed takes decisions is largely from the member banks. Its one of those strange public-private partnerships, that I would consider mostly private.
       
        And It goes without saying that the board of governors are usually former Wallstreet barons.

    9. Re:Lesson 1 by Lando · · Score: 1

      No, the Fed is an independent organization within the government and it's run like a corporation in many ways, but it is still part of the government and acts as the central bank for the government. The fact is that there is a meme that says it is not a part of the government, but that is false. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    10. Re:Lesson 1 by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

      From the wiki (the one you linked) : The Federal Reserve System has both private and public components, and was designed to serve the interests of both the general public and private bankers. The result is a structure that is considered unique among central banks. It is also unusual in that an entity outside of the central bank, namely the United States Department of the Treasury, creates the currency used.[12]

      Also from the wiki "According to the Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve is independent within government". Just because the board of governors consider themselves to be part of the govt, doesnt mean they are part of the govt. Its like IBM saying it wants to make peoples life better.

    11. Re:Lesson 1 by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In addition to your comment, the source code was never available for sale to any other party. It wasn't "infringement" in that it cost the Fed lost sales, it lost them exclusive access to sensitive data that they only wanted a limited number of people to have access to. The financial loss isn't related to lost sales, but in potential security implications. Apples and Oranges.

      In this case, it was more like theft because the Fed lost exclusive use of the software, something that can't be given back once it is in the wild. Piracy is completely different, where 100 copies of a file can cost lost sales of 1 or 2 actual copies, but no loss of use or security is involved, only revenue. With music and movies, you WANT many people to have access to the product, but at a cost. With exclusive software, you want NO ONE to have a copy. Neither is ideal if you own the "property", but they aren't the same.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:Lesson 1 by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      No, that's bullshit. That's like saying you're free to kill anyone you like, as you haven't signed anything saying you agree to laws against murder.

      NOTE: I am not comparing copyright infringement to murder. I am simply comparing choosing to disobey one set of laws to another.

    13. Re:Lesson 1 by Lando · · Score: 2

      No they are one of the 9? independent agencies within the government that are directly overseen by congress and not a secretary or member of the executive branch. Wikipedia is a starting point, not an authority on any subject since anyone can go in and change things however they want. I provided the link as a place to get started, not as part of my argument. I barely glanced at the information on the page having researched this a couple of years ago. If nothing else the link to the official government webpage should be there somewhere or the associated pages linked to the article. I don't really have the time to argue the point either way. If you are interested in it, read up on the subject, don't just read to confirm your own viewpoint.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    14. Re:Lesson 1 by icebraining · · Score: 1

      I was merely explaining the difference between the actions, not claiming one should be free from the legal consequences of such actions.

      But defending file sharing doesn't necesseraly mean one defends breaking the law; it may also mean on defends the abolishment of copyright laws, which would make the action legal.

    15. Re:Lesson 1 by nedlohs · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So if the Federal Reserve doesn't "issue money" can you explain the word issue in:

      Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized.

      - US Code, Title 12 Chapter 3 Subchapter XII Section 411 - http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/12/411.html

      Or are you just sticking to a technically that the Board isn't the Fed, so the Microsoft Board of Directors doesn't count as Microsoft for example.

      Or that having the power to direct something to be done isn't the same as doing it - so that whole gulf oil thing a while back has isn't BHPs problem after all they just told their contractors and employees to do it.

    16. Re:Lesson 1 by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      >Fed is not part of the government. Its a private entity controlled by the members.

      That is incorrect.

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Bank.

      The Fed is not a Federal Entity for some purposes (such as torts); it is clearly a Federal Entity for many other purposes, legal and otherwise. If you don't understand the distinction of "for the purpose of a legal theory," then you should study some law. From Wikipedia:

      >>The Federal Reserve Banks have an intermediate legal status, with some features of private corporations and some features of public federal agencies. The United States has an interest in the Federal Reserve Banks as tax-exempt federally-created instrumentalities whose profits belong to the federal government, but this interest is not proprietary.[2] In Lewis v. United States,[3] the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit stated that: "The Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA [the Federal Tort Claims Act], but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations." The opinion went on to say, however, that: "The Reserve Banks have properly been held to be federal instrumentalities for some purposes." Another relevant decision is Scott v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City,[2] in which the distinction is made between Federal Reserve Banks, which are federally-created instrumentalities, and the Board of Governors, which is a federal agency.

    17. Re:Lesson 1 by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      The Federal Reserve Banks are not government, and are owned by member banks in their respective reserve bank districts.

      The Federal Reserve Board is a governmental agency with certain powers delegated by Congress. It, in turn, delegates some of its regulatory authority to the member Reserve Banks.

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    18. Re:Lesson 1 by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So is the government.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    19. Re:Lesson 1 by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      "is if the govt cannot sell bonds below a certain rate, the fed will buy them"

      So, why exactly does the government pay intrest for that money? And what does the intrest is spent by the FED?

    20. Re:Lesson 1 by Pope · · Score: 1

      Agreed! Cupcakes are yummy!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    21. Re:Lesson 1 by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "In this case, it was more like theft because the Fed lost exclusive use of the software, something that can't be given back once it is in the wild. Piracy is completely different..."

      Nope. Piracy is the loss of your right to distribute your material as you see fit because some numbnuts thinks his desires trump your copyright. Copyright is not about revenue. Once disbursed into the wild, it can't be called back either. More same than not.

    22. Re:Lesson 1 by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      More like theft? But the action still is not theft. See, there's this website called "Wikileaks" not "Wikithefts", and no one has any problem comprehending the name. I don't hear anyone saying it ought to change its name either. Why do people continue to accept this incorrect characterization and conflation? You even say "piracy is completely different". Then why are you trying to say this action isn't completely different from theft? It's a leak, not a theft. It's hard to say that this even really counts as a leak. Were others being told what the code was for? Is it worthy of being considered a valuable secret? Doesn't sound like it.

      What I see is the typical hysteria of keepers of secrets who have been compromised, or think they've been compromised, or feel someone has demonstrated a way in which they could be compromised. They're very free with that hot button concept, theft. Ironically, the fuss has likely attracted the attention of the very people they wanted to keep in the dark. They've triggered a Streisand Effect. One of the more annoying things about government work was their desire to classify everything as secret. Mostly it was paranoia about keeping their own butts covered, hiding problems or favoritism behind a veil of secrecy, but it was also paranoia that anything could be valuable information. They tried to lock down basic science. You'd have some idiot bureaucrats who, after being introduced to a basic algorithm, something simple enough that they could understand it without a lot of study and training, such as Quicksort, and being impressed with its power, would demand that it be considered a national secret. No enemies were to know that their fantastic project relied upon the awesome power of Quicksort, or know of Quicksort itself! That kind of crap makes collaboration impossible. No one can share anything with anyone else. Remember the fuss over encryption technology. Netscape had to have 2 versions of their browser, and was not allowed to let foreigners download the version with stronger encryption. A t-shirt with a few lines of code counted as a munition. The government harassed the author of PGP.

      The poor bastard who is accused will be railroaded if the Fed has its way. I hope for his sake that the courts are calmer and cooler. Sandy Berger's punishment, for what was probably far more valuable information, was largely to his reputation. He was fined $50000 (probably peanuts to him), and put on probation and ordered to do some community service. No jail time.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    23. Re:Lesson 1 by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Woops...

      I do that all the time since I gre up with a lot more exposure to BHP as a name than BP - and fingers seem to add that H without my brain noticing...

    24. Re:Lesson 1 by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      "So, why exactly does the government pay intrest for that money?"

      To discourage extra spending.

      "And what does the intrest is spent by the FED?"

      That's an awkward bit - it turns its profits to the US Treasury. Does that make sense to you? Me neither.

      FED is a bit of arcane entity - it's a public institution that uses private banks as its components. A lot of other countries simply have a specialized central bank, but the US has this distributed system.

    25. Re:Lesson 1 by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      You get to change the piece sets, never the game, the players and you're stuck with the board.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    26. Re:Lesson 1 by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Nope. Piracy is the loss of your right to distribute your material as you see fit because some numbnuts thinks his desires trump your copyright. Copyright is not about revenue. Once disbursed into the wild, it can't be called back either. More same than not.

      Um, nope to you. If I pirate the latest "Britney Spears" album (shudder....) then she can still distribute it all she wants. She can continue to sell CD's and online copies at iTunes. Her song wasn't a "secret", the software was. And once she has distributed ONE copy, even for cash, it is "in the wild".

      You are missing the entire point. It isn't about having control over distributing, it is about having control over NOT distributing that was lost. As to the value of the software, I have no idea and it is meaningless, but the mechanism involved is the exact opposite of music or video piracy.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    27. Re:Lesson 1 by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Thank for your informative reply.

    28. Re:Lesson 1 by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The Fed is a bank with an enormous balance sheet.

      More than that though it's a CENTRAL BANK

      It doesn't print or generate money

      In our current banking system all banks "generate money" in a sense. It's just a case of whether it's pseudo-money or "real money" (so far as any fiat currency can be "real").

      A regular bank creates pseudo-money. When you deposit $1000 at the bank the bank keeps $100 of it (assuming a 10% reserve requirement) as "real money" (either cash in a vault or a deposit at the central bank) and invests the rest (either in making loans or otherwise). However to you your bank balance looks and acts like money. Therefore the bank the bank has effectively created $900 of pseudo money.

      The amount of pseudo-money a regular bank can generate is limited by reserve requirements. With a 10% reserve requirement for every $900 of psuedo-money the commercial banks generate they must keep $100 of "real money".

      Plus it's still pseudo-money. If an unexpectedly large proportion of the bank's customers suddenly tries to withdraw their money the bank needs real money to pay those withdrawals. As long as the bank is financially healthy this isn't too much of a problem, the bank will just borrow money from either another regular bank or from the central bank but if the bank is not financially healthy (liabilities too close to or even exceeding assets) then it has a BIG problem and in the absence of government intervention it is likely to go bankrupt.

      Central banks on the other hand create "real money", there is no reserve requirement on them, deposits at the central bank are considered legally equivalent to cash and if an unexpectedly large number of institutions (individuals don't usually have deposits at the central bank) withdraw their deposits then the central bank will simply issue more cash to cover them, it cannot go bankrupt (unless it's stupid enough to take on significant liabilities in foreign currency). Central banks are created by and get their authority from the government.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  2. Citizenship not required? by magarity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Every government IT job like this I've ever seen has US citizenship required, not even green card required. How did this guy get in?

    1. Re:Citizenship not required? by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Okay, it's not government technically. And why can't he have citizenship?

    2. Re:Citizenship not required? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Every government IT job like this I've ever seen has US citizenship required, not even green card required. How did this guy get in?

      Perhaps most other COBOL programmers are retired?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Citizenship not required? by ToadProphet · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Bloomberg article states that he's a Chinese citizen in the US on a work visa

      --
      It's on America's tortured brow, That Mickey Mouse has grown up a cow
    4. Re:Citizenship not required? by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

      Initech has had trouble finding people who can write bank software lately, especially after their building burned down.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    5. Re:Citizenship not required? by PPH · · Score: 2

      He knows COBOL? Pardon him and hire him immediately!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:Citizenship not required? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      The story says that he's Chinese, not that he's a Chinese citizen. Usually, the FBI labels Chinese non-US citizens as "Chinese nationals". In this case, since only the "Chinese" label is being used, it probably only means that he's of Chinese born, or of Chinese origin, but nothing else.

      Also, since he "stole" the code for his own private training business, I wonder if it's not just the code he authored that he stole. I'm not trying to excuse his actions, I'm just trying to explain why would someone be so cavalier about teaching a class with such materials (usually, programmers teaching classes have to list the examples they're going to use in the agenda they advertise, otherwise nobody shows up).

      Zhang faces up to 10 years in prison and a fine up to $250,000, or twice the financial gain derived from the offense or twice the gross financial loss to the victims.

      Also, I wonder how they're going to calculate the gross financial loss to the victim (unless the real victim here is the middleman between the government and the individual doing the work, not the government itself). It's not like the government was planning to sell that software. So even if it paid 9 million dollars to get that code written, it doesn't sound like they lost anything by his actions (unless they can prove they have to do additional work trying to make it more secure because of him).

    7. Re:Citizenship not required? by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      It's pronounced 'retarded'.

    8. Re:Citizenship not required? by RenderSeven · · Score: 3, Informative

      The story says that he's Chinese, not that he's a Chinese citizen.

      The Bloomberg article states that he is in fact a Chinese citizen

      since he "stole" the code for his own private training business

      No, he claims he stole it for his own private business. May or may not be true, but it sure sounds better than admitting espionage.

    9. Re:Citizenship not required? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Not slipped up. Since 2001, we have allowed Chinese into our vital systems. That is why they quit asking for access to our tech. They are simple stealing it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    10. Re:Citizenship not required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And why can't he have citizenship?

      I assume you suspect a racial inference based on the guy's name? Read the article, he's Chinese. As in, from China.

    11. Re:Citizenship not required? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Seriously? I've heard many bad things about COBOL, a lot of it from my own mother who coded in it for many years... But I've never heard a bad word about a COBOL programmer. Can you imagine having to work with that? They're anything but retarded.

    12. Re:Citizenship not required? by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Informative

      Zhang is a Chinese citizen, said a person with knowledge of the matter who didn’t want to be identified because the information wasn’t public.
      The software system relates to the “tracking of the billions of dollars that are electronically transferred every day in the U.S.’s general ledger,” prosecutors said.
      Zhang has been in the U.S. on a work visa since 2000, said another person familiar with the matter who also didn’t want to be identified because the information isn’t public.

      Kind of destroys your theory there.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:Citizenship not required? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      You can pretty much be assured that his "private business" was actually state business - Chinese state business, to be exact. It's pretty damn well known that any Chinese national you've got on your network is likely to be trying to steal passwords and fish for holes in your network to report back to the homeland government...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    14. Re:Citizenship not required? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Seriously? I've heard many bad things about COBOL, a lot of it from my own mother who coded in it for many years... But I've never heard a bad word about a COBOL programmer. Can you imagine having to work with that? They're anything but retarded.

      Of course I'm joking (mostly, though a lot of COBOL programmers are retired by now) banks were extremely slow to ditch code which was written (largely in COBOL or RPG) in favor of the Flavor-of-the-Month, un-tested, un-vetted server languages of the internet age. When Y2K loomed they brought in legions of old COBOL programmers (many of whom were compensated quite well) to review millions of lines of code and patch where necessary. Likely a lot of that code is still there, interfacing with Federal Reserve System or as part of it. Just because it's old code doesn't make it bad code.

      While COBOL isn't my thing, if I were doing purely financial work I might give it another look. Java, Perl, PHP, etc, aren't what I would really trust, even now, for financial transactions which could happen in the millions daily and hit decimal numbers in the hundreds of billions, where every digit integrity is essential. That was something COBOL was good at.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    15. Re:Citizenship not required? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      He's probably going to get an extended visa now as the contending U.S. Waterboarding champion as they begin to question him more deeply about his unauthorized possession of code from our money clowns.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    16. Re:Citizenship not required? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Read the article, he's Chinese. As in, from China.

      The article just says chineese it doesn't clarify the exact meaning (racial, country of birth, current citizenship etc).

      As I understand it there are some hoops to jump through but generally anyone who has lived in the US as a lawful permanent resident for more than 5 years can become a citizen and afaict it is generally advisable for them to do so.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    17. Re:Citizenship not required? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Re-reading the article it seems the article does in fact say he was on a visa not a citizen but it attributes that information to "a person who did not want to be identified", not to any official statement.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    18. Re:Citizenship not required? by Pionar · · Score: 1

      Also, I wonder how they're going to calculate the gross financial loss to the victim (unless the real victim here is the middleman between the government and the individual doing the work, not the government itself). It's not like the government was planning to sell that software. So even if it paid 9 million dollars to get that code written, it doesn't sound like they lost anything by his actions (unless they can prove they have to do additional work trying to make it more secure because of him).

      Financial loss isn't just lost revenues, it could be the cost of re-engineering parts of the system in which the private, proprietary algorithms are no longer private and proprietary.

      It could also be the cost of extra security measures needed to combat any holes that were exposed by the source being "in the wild."

    19. Re:Citizenship not required? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Not for much longer, unless we change things.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    20. Re:Citizenship not required? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Every government IT job like this I've ever seen has US citizenship required, not even green card required. How did this guy get in?

      The Federal Reserve is as much of a government agency as Federal Express is. OK, Federal Express if the Chairman of the Board were chosen by shipping magnates by then officially appointed by POTUS.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  3. Lesson: read what you sign by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I work in a place that makes you sign an NDA. Betcha he had to sign one too. Whether blueprints or code, industrial espionage is a real crime, both morally and legally.

    1. Re:Lesson: read what you sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Legally, yes. Morally, maybe not. There's a good case to be made that corporations, not being people, shouldn't have any right to privacy.

    2. Re:Lesson: read what you sign by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Morally? It sounds like he was just using snippets of code he wrote there to teach people CS.

      That doesn't sound especially morally bankrupt to me. I know I've had professors who have done work for the DoD who have given lectures on how certain things were done within cruise missiles, etc., which seems a lot more ambiguous than code for the bloody fed.

    3. Re:Lesson: read what you sign by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Morally? It sounds like he was just using snippets of code he wrote there to teach people CS.

      If you belive that I've got a bridge to sell you.

      If you were looking to teach CS, would you get your code snippets from:

      a) One of the plethora of open source projects out there
      b) An O'Reilly book
      c) Commercially sensitive software that belongs to your employer and that you agreed to not spread around
      d) Something very secret that runs something very scary and boomy-bangy on the B2. %$
      * @
      &
      no carrier

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Re:With people like these... by EEPROMS · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. this has nothing to do with China 2. USA is just as bad as China when it comes to covert internet access, just that China doesn't run around complaining like a little girl when it happens.

  5. Re:Why? by tomhath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FTA: "he used the GWA Code in connection with a private business he ran training individuals in computer programming" Training individuals who are interested in the Fed's software? Now who (cough) would be interested in that?

  6. Really? by wbr1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Zhang said that he used the GWA Code in connection with a private business he ran training individuals in computer programming.

    Correctly edited version: Zhang said that he used the GWA Code in connection with a private business he ran training Chinese Hackers in Reserve Bank Code.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Really? by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      I guess at Fox that's correct editing. Meanwhile the original properly attributes the statement to the defendant, and anyone with reading comprehension skills can tell a defendant's statement is only that, not fact.

      But what the hey, if you want to declare fact and guilt before the investigation it presented to a judge, I hear that's pretty big in China. You'd do well there.

      It was meant as sarcasm. Grow a sense of humor.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    2. Re:Really? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Correctly edited version: Zhang said that he used the GWA Code in connection with a private business he ran training Chinese Hackers in Reserve Bank Code.

      That's all right then. Otherwise he would probably have been in violation of the work visa that Bloomberg says he held.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  7. Re:With people like these... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it a wonder that there is a growing contempt for China and its actions?

    I believe we've gone way past the "three times is enemy action" for incidents like these.

    Sensationalism by the author, playing to the xenophobic among the indigenous readership. It should have been 'Programmer Steals Code ..' Not 'Chinese Programmer Steals Code ...'

    Now, if he were an agent of the PRC, a point of nationality would be highly relevant, but in this case it does not serve fair news reporting.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  8. Nothing Interesting by brainzach · · Score: 2

    “Government-Wide Accounting and Reporting Program” (GWA), a software system owned by the Department of the Treasury that is used mainly to manage central accounting and reporting functions and processes associated with budget execution, accountability, and asset management.

    Just sounds like some average bloated corporate code that was stolen. Nothing noteworthy.

    1. Re:Nothing Interesting by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      “Government-Wide Accounting and Reporting Program” (GWA), a software system owned by the Department of the Treasury that is used mainly to manage central accounting and reporting functions and processes associated with budget execution, accountability, and asset management.

      Just sounds like some average bloated corporate code that was stolen. Nothing noteworthy.

      He was probably using it as an example of obfuscated code You can't beat code writtent to government specifications for cruft, obfuscation and general unuseability.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Nothing Interesting by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Sounds like governmentese for general ledger.

      I'm guessing it was a huge mess of import and mapping, one per government accounting system 'incorporated'. Awful soul draining work. Decades of government accounting tricks to unscramble, unify, and apply standard book cooking to present a unified coherent lie.

      Use it like a club on the students: 'Do you want to end up maintaining this?'

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Nothing Interesting by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah. Most likely he was using it as an example of "how not to write code."

  9. Re:With people like these... by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 2

    2. USA is just as bad as China when it comes to covert internet access, just that China doesn't run around complaining like a little girl when it happens.

    I can't decide if this is misogynist, bully-ist, antidemocratic, or just silly.

    Your other point is good, though. It's a guy teaching. I don't have any problem with him using the code, he just should have asked permission and they should have been willing to give it to him. Problem is they see it as something it's worth making an example over--possibly destroying his life because he didn't see a problem with using a snippet of code that, in all likelihood, it was not a problem to use.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
  10. The source code might look like this.. by teknx · · Score: 1, Funny

    private class LeechAmericanPeople{}

  11. meanwhile just a handful of hours away by Osgeld · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is an unemployed American programmer begging for minimum wage temporary night shift job, and eating spaghetti for the 4th night in a row, meanwhile these shits are hiring Chinese contractors

    God bless America!

    1. Re:meanwhile just a handful of hours away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is an unemployed American programmer begging for minimum wage temporary night shift job, and eating spaghetti for the 4th night in a row, meanwhile these shits are hiring Chinese contractors

      God bless America!

      Wait, what's that I hear? The sound of misplaced sense of entitlement?

    2. Re:meanwhile just a handful of hours away by sdguero · · Score: 1

      Where is he? Because we are hiring. Unless he expects to sit in his cube and eat spaghetti for 4 days in a row, not writing code. Because that seems to be a recurring theme among our candidates.

    3. Re:meanwhile just a handful of hours away by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely no sense of entitlement at all. A country should be putting the employment of it's citizens ahead of those of other countries.

    4. Re:meanwhile just a handful of hours away by ironjaw33 · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely no sense of entitlement at all. A country should be putting the employment of it's citizens ahead of those of other countries.

      You got it. I applied for a job in Canada recently and it was stated on the application under no uncertain terms that Canadian citizens would be given preference.

    5. Re:meanwhile just a handful of hours away by happyhamster · · Score: 1

      Surely smells like bs. You can't find decent developers? In THIS economy?

      A few things to check:
      - are your expectations realistic, or are you looking for PhD with tons of experience while advertising for recent grad to "save some money"?
      - are you paying above $10-$15/hr or whatever minimally decent rate is in your area?
      - do you provide a semi-decent work environment: hardware, software, atmosphere?
      - are you running a sweatshop (be honest)?

      Your attitude is disgusting. I hope that your "company" never finds those hypothetical employees and quietly folds like it should.

    6. Re:meanwhile just a handful of hours away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should move a handful of hours to another city. This person moved many hours away to another country.

    7. Re:meanwhile just a handful of hours away by Reigo+Reinmets · · Score: 1

      Please do send me an ad / job posting about what you are hiring as I'm looking for a job?

    8. Re:meanwhile just a handful of hours away by sdguero · · Score: 1

      Despite your negative comments I will answer you questions...

      I work in a QA offshoot so our team isn't actually hiring devs right now, but the company is (and I could potentially refer people for those positions). I can speak in more detail about salary for the QA openings we have been trying to fill for over a year though...
      -The team hired me two years ago. At the time, I had a bachelors degree in History, 6 years experience in QA, some of that doing a similar type of testing, and I had worked with one team member before (that's how I found out about the opening).
      -The salary is in the six figure range. As it should be for a senior QA engineer in California.
      -It's a large public company, so yes.
      -I averaged 40 hours a week in 2011, 50 during crunch times and 35 when it's slow (like now). And I'm on /. chatting with someone who has semi-insulted me already, so obviously I have time to screw around.

      Anyway, thanks for the well wishes hamster. I will offer a piece of advice. I have a cool team right now, and attitude plays a big part in the people we chose to work with. Negative people are simply not welcome (in fact, I replaced a guy that carried a lot of angst around with him, he was demoted to standard QA dept doing less interesting work). I recommend you find something that puts you in a good place mentally before trying to join an engineering organization. It takes more than hard tech skills (although these are def required) and long hours (these shouldn't be needed) to be a good engineer.

    9. Re:meanwhile just a handful of hours away by sdguero · · Score: 1
  12. "WEAR IT UNTIL YOU LOVE IT!" -- hollywood enema by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Carlin - The Real Owners Of America

    "The real owners are the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians, they're an irrelevancy. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They've long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the statehouses, the city halls. They've got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media companies, so that they control just about all of the news and information you hear. They've got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying  lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want; they want more for themselves and less for everybody else."

    "But I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interests. They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table and figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago.

    "You know what they want? Obedient workers  people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork but just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, reduced benefits, the end of overtime and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And, now, they're coming for your Social Security. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back, so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all, sooner or later, because they own this fucking place. It's a big club, and you ain't in it. You and I are not in the big club."

    "This country is finished."

  13. Maybe better background checks? by Karmashock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems every other day we're hearing about some chinese scientist or programmer that steals US proprietary secrets of some kind. Why does this keep happening? I thought the whole point of a background check was to avoid this sort of thing. Review where you f'ed up in the background check. See what you knew at the start that should have been a red flag and then add it to the disqualified list. If you were fooled at that point or didn't get enough information then see to it that you're harder to fool and gather more information. This is just sad.

    Do your damn background checks.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Maybe better background checks? by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can do all the background checks you want. If a representative of the Chinese government says "Here's 20K$ to hand us some code", a very large percentage of people will say "Deal". If a representative of the Chinese government says "hand us the code you work on, or your relatives in China disappear", a very large percentage of people will say "what sort of media would you like it on".

    2. Re:Maybe better background checks? by ironjaw33 · · Score: 1

      You can do all the background checks you want. If a representative of the Chinese government says "Here's 20K$ to hand us some code", a very large percentage of people will say "Deal". If a representative of the Chinese government says "hand us the code you work on, or your relatives in China disappear", a very large percentage of people will say "what sort of media would you like it on".

      Part of the process for some of these checks, especially for security clearances, is to find and weed out the candidates who are likely to disclose confidential information. It probably wasn't too rigorous in this case since security clearances and the extensive background checks that go with them are reserved only for US citizens. Getting a clearance, however, can be quite extensive, with investigators running down and questioning everyone you've lived and worked with for the past decade, administering polygraphs, and analyzing your behavior and personality to see if you are likely to keep quiet or blab to the first foreign agent you see. Of course, some still fall through the cracks.

    3. Re:Maybe better background checks? by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      Background checks scan for both qualities.

      First, they look for people that don't have pride in their personal honor and integrity. Ideally, you're looking for people that will not violate their oaths because they have deep seated principles. This is detectable.

      Second, you disqualify anyone that has weaknesses. Drunks, drug addicts, gamblers, womanizers, people with family in countries where pressure could be put on them, connections to organized crime, any connection to fringe political organizations, membership in weird religions, odd personal beliefs of any kind... etc.

      And that's just the start of it. Do background check and don't be afraid to simply bump people out for not meeting them. It's not like you've said they're bad people. You've just disqualified them from that position. Get lax about it and you're going to have problems. Simple as that.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  14. Re:With people like these... by Osgeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have more contempt for the fuck that hired a Chinese contractor to work on government systems while people are begging for jobs here

  15. And his other client, of course by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    WAS THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  16. It was the subroutine ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... that implemented, "One for you. One for Goldman Sachs. One for you ...."

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  17. Mr. Bo Zhang-gles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did he steal the code and dance out of the place?

    1. Re:Mr. Bo Zhang-gles? by tqk · · Score: 1

      Did he steal the code and dance out of the place?

      I always email myself a copy of my final submitted code, to cover my butt, to serve as a backup, and to optimize my ability to support my work. This is wrong? Why?

      As for dancing out, damned right!

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  18. Re:With people like these... by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it a wonder that there is a growing contempt for China and its actions?

    If all it takes is for one citizen to copy a bit of code for you to hold his country in contempt, then you must really hate America after all those people lost billions of dollars in the Enron scandal. Of course, I chose the Enron example at random, but there are probably thousands of criminal acts occurring across the country every day. If you are going to just single out the ones committed by people of Chinese decent then think that says more about you than China.

  19. Re:With people like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What if he was the best for the job?

  20. China thanks you by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    America is LOADED with Chinese spies. China is in a cold war with the west, and the west is disregarding it. Sad.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:China thanks you by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      America is LOADED with Chinese spies. China is in a cold war with the west, and the west is disregarding it. Sad.

      No, it is something to be proud of. That such things can happen is a necessary consequence of a free society. It's one of the many things encompassed by the saying that, "Freedom isn't free."

      We've already destroyed far too much of our freedom because of an irrational fear of practically non-existant terrorists, we should not sacrifice any more of the fundamental principles that make american society superior to chinese society. Unless, of course, civil liberties aren't inherently better than authoritarianism.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:China thanks you by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Civil Liberties does NOT require a lack of security. In this case, a foreigner, esp. a Chinese national (and yes, he was chinese national) should not have access to this code. Likewise, I have had 2 jobs where I have dealt with chinese spy. In one case, they OPENLY admitted that they wanted to take our work to China. Even spoke of how to get it out of the nation.

      And what threat is non-existant? AQ? They are very real. I DO think that we have acted overboard to them, and what the neo-cons did was INSANE. However, the threats are real.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:China thanks you by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The idea that america is "loaded" with spies implies a call for change in government policy. Even your anecdotes don't rise to the level that requires government action - if you knew that guy was plotting espionage than tell your boss, get him fired and the problem is solved.

      And yes, AQ's threat to the US is and has been effectively non-existant. They shot their wad on 9-11 and since then the best they could muster has been incompetents like the shoe, underwear and times square bombers - even if they had been competent the sum threat they all posed was less than a week's worth of traffic fatalities, or 12 hours worth of heart disease.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:China thanks you by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Not just Chinese spies ... America is LOADED with Mossad and AIPAC agents. Turkish agents. Saudi princes ready to party. Ukrainian mafia probably put about a Billion dollars in the coffers of the Bush family -- likely they are rolling in Opium today. It's all up for grabs...

      Nobody is going to attack America if they can merely bid for the Speaker of the House. I'm wondering when Christies is going to quit playing with the chump change million dollar art auctions and organize this mayhem into a profitable enterprise.

      Via looking the other way because EVERYONE was corrupt, Washington has become the fricken' UN. I can imagine that most of the work for Chinese intelligence is sifting through the crap that they already stole, and sorting that from the crap that already came in a diplomatic pouch.

      When Sibel Edmonds blew the whistle about Nuclear weapons secrets that she translated from Turkish intelligence communications -- she was ignored and told to sit down and shut up. Going higher only got her in trouble. She also claimed that Dennis Hastert was on Turkey's payroll -- nothing happened. Now D H is a highly paid consultant for Turkey -- he's probably giving them million dollar history lessons like Newt gave Fannie Mae.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    5. Re:China thanks you by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      The idea that america is "loaded" with spies implies a call for change in government policy. Even your anecdotes don't rise to the level that requires government action - if you knew that guy was plotting espionage than tell your boss, get him fired and the problem is solved.

      I'm a Progressive, and I figure MOST wars are for profit and a scam. I'm not big on the Security State or the Pentagon.

      Having said that... are you fricken' kidding me? The only reason nobody cares if some Chinese national is stealing their stuff is if the whole thing is corrupt and security is a farce for our benefit.

      Why are we bothering to spy on every American and sniff every shoe traveling on an airplane, if ANY imported worker could be working against a company that is doing work that is vital to national security? And by any measure, the Fed is vital to national security.

      If nobody cares, that means they already have one foot out the door and don't care who does what. I'd say this was an instance of arguing over deck chairs on the Titanic -- but someone already sold them.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    6. Re:China thanks you by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      It's weird that you think no change in government policy is equivalent to "nobody cares."

      They did arrest this guy didn't they?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:China thanks you by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, I took it to the FBI. And we need a massive change in our employee security policies, as well as how sub-contracts are handled.

      No, we have been stopping AQ. They continue to make attempts. Constantly. I can tell you about this. My little sister works for an airline at an airport. She knows a number of TSA folks. She has been there when they pull ppl aside of weird things. Regularly, it is muslims that have oddly shaped items such as plastic toy knives, hidden in weird areas. Basically, they are trying to figure out what can be gotten through security. In addition, do you recall that situation in which 4 muslims were taken off an airline? The one where the muslims said that they did knot know each other? Well, some info did not make it out to the general press but was known by the airlines. All 4 tickets were purchased by the same person and all 4 had same address. IOW, they lied. These men were mapping security, which is why TSA is constantly changing to deal with issues.

      There is little doubt that AQ is VERY active in the west. And it is not just USA. They are making constant attempts in EU and UK. The reason why Obama has not changed a number of policies is because they are keeping America safe.

      Now as a person who has worked on PATRIOT act, I can tell you, that I have issues with it. There need to be more safeguards put into place. In particular, it is being grossly misapplied. Right now, the vast majority of 'terrorists' are not terrorists, but drug criminals. The fact that we have to use PATRIOT act to catch them, and still not making a dent actually shows how badly the republican-created and pushed drug war is going. So, the PATRIOT act can also be used against the politicians (mostly pubs) that push this insane war. IOW, if we had some bright politicians, they would be able to point that out. They seem to miss that point. They also miss the point that it is being misapplied.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:China thanks you by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      While I do not know about other nation's spies, I KNOW that they exists. That is a given. However, with the chinese, they are pressing like there is no tomorrow. Upwards of 10% or more of Chinese are either outright spies, or are fronts for spy operations and will gladly send tech out of the nation. That includes those that have been naturalized esp. over the last 20 years.

      But, I fully agree with you about CONgress. So many are on the take from China, Foreign nations, Groups representing illegals, unions, businesses, etc.. Everybody EXCEPT for the citizens (except for the wealthy ones). SO many ppl scream that it is the other party, when in fact, it is BOTH parties.

      That is why I back rootstrikers. Even as a Libertarian, I have to say, that It is obvious that we need massive controls back on CONgress. Then perhaps, CONgress will represent America, and not all of the others outside of here.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    9. Re:China thanks you by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      oh, the guy was not an employee. He was attempting to invest into our company. Basically, he claimed to be from Taiwain years ago. He made his money in multiple chinese restaurants. One of the conditions buried in it was that our equipment became his if he decided that the company was not worth anything. When he turned down the offer, then he wanted to 'rent' the equipment for a time to take to China. Promised 10 million. Then 50 million. Said that he had ways to get it out there. The FBI is looking into the case.

      There was a another individual, but it was hard to tell if she was a spy or not.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    10. Re:China thanks you by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Lol, the whole terrorists are "probing" our security is such baloney. The TSA regualrly trumpets their useless accomplishments like confiscating drugs and guns but not a single person has even been indicted on terrorism charges, much less convicted, due to a TSA interdiction. Furthermore, if the TSA really was effective at stopping terrorists, they would just go somewhere else like a shopping mall or movie theater or sabotage the train tracks out in the boonies where there is nobody at all much less anybody actually watching for them. Yet none of it happens, ergo their ain't anything going on.

      The reason why Obama hasn't changed "a number of policies" is because of things like inertia and irrational freak-outs like what happened when he tried to close gitmo and move the prisoners to a maximum security prison.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    11. Re:China thanks you by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      Can you supply some verifiable citation of any of this stuff? You make an awful lot of assertions but I haven't seen any proof of any of the things you've said from any credible source. "My sister said..." and "Some info did not make it out to the general press..." are the hallmarks of the tinfoil hat set. Back it up or pack it up, please.

      Virg

  21. Racists by digitallife · · Score: 5, Informative

    Holy f#ck people are racist on here.
    The dude was using some code he wrote to train people. Can we assume guilt of something *after guilt has been proven*? Pretty please?

    1. Re:Racists by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Racists by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      In this case, it appears to be fairly warranted. Although I agree with the Innocent until Proven Guilty thing.

  22. Re:Blown out of proportion by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    The same Goldman Sachs and BOA that were cracked after he worked there?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  23. they issue electronic money all the time by decora · · Score: 2

    soooooo yeah.

  24. please for the love of god read more books by decora · · Score: 2

    if you would read Henry Paulson's "On the Brink" he specifically talks about how the Russian government tried to do EXACTLY this in 2008 with the help of the Chinese government. But the Chinese government told the Russians to fuck off and die in a fire. Why ?Partly because Henry Paulson had been the CEO of Goldman Sachs and heavily involved in China for the past several years, . . . his book mentions far more discussions with Chinese leaders during the crash of 2008 than he mentions people like Dick Cheney or even George Bush.

    none of this has anything to do with 'hackers' or 'source code'.

  25. Unless by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    His mistake was he should have covered himself by stealing a few billion dollars and giving a few million dollars to election campaigns. Or may he should have incorporated as a bank...

  26. Re:With people like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nope, the cheapest.

  27. CALING BS (AGAIN) by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    You've got to be fucking kidding. If I hadn't already commented in this thread, I'd mod down this BS.

    Likely he got the job because they couldn't hire any qualified US citizens. (That's a requirement in H1B, etc., right? OK, we know that HB1 is also a bit of BS, but...)

    The bottom line is that Chinese kids are willing to work, and they actually learn things. American kids are even lazier than the 70s, when they spent half of their time in College drunk or hight. Today, for the first time in its history, the US is going to have a generation that is less educated than the previous two generations.

    An American programmer paid minimum wage? Like hell. Perhaps a wannabee american programmer who can't get shit done. But the reason America is where it is, is because Americans are fucking lazy ignorant xenophobes.

    1. Re:CALING BS (AGAIN) by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      minimum wage just to have a job (cause it pays better than unemployment), not a career path you dumb fuck

    2. Re:CALING BS (AGAIN) by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      If you're a real programmer, you can get a job. Maybe a 45k post as well, as job instead of the 70K or 90K or whatever you like, or a short-term position with even less $ or hours, but if you're willing to move or commute, you can find a job well above minimum wage.

      I dropped my rant against this being a racist xenophoblic BS, as someone else had already pointed it out, but seriously. With the incompetent "Geek Squad" charging $400 to transfer data from an old laptop to a new one, you can't find work? You're not trying.

      And by the way, since you mentioned it, sodomize you up your dumb hole with a sharpened corn cob until perotinitis allows your brains to seep out.

    3. Re:CALING BS (AGAIN) by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      let me know how those magic numbers work in the real world and not in your imagination while your in your moms basement (shit if I lived in california 45K wouldnt buy a cardboard box to live in)

      what does geek squad pay? like 8 bucks an hour a whole 50 cents more than minimum wage, and you dont think I already didnt apply? (yea both best buys are full up on nerds after 4 comp usa's in town shut down a few years ago genius)

      and there is nothing racist about my statement, this is a government project outsourcing to contracted labor (shit they probably flew the guy in) while its own citizens are begging for work, its boggling. I am not trying? fuck you asswipe, you dont know me, and obiously you dont know the work climate right now, how could you? you havent even finished middle school yet

    4. Re:CALING BS (AGAIN) by theNAM666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I might suggest you read my comment history, if you think I'm in middle school, my friend.

      I didn't suggest that you *work* for the Geek Squad. I suggested that anyone hungry and with half a clue could steal the Geek Squad's lunch.

      More seriously, I get these sort of "jobs" from friends all the time. My bartender approached me last night, and said he took his virus-crashed laptop to Best Buy and they quoted him $400 to move the files off and to his new Mac. He told me he'd give me $200 to do the job-- adding that he had certain files with his wife that were, shall we say, "private" in nature and he didn't trust Best Buy to deal with.

      That kind of work is everywhere. If the Geek Squad is charging $100/hr to do very basic tech (setting up DVRs, etc) then you can undercut that-- and provide a professional relationship. It's not work I really want-- but how you beat the big corporate guys, is by providing a better price point, and a better service. Get a $700 suit for $300 on OverStock, treat your customers well, communicate with them in standard written English, establish trust and security. Kiss their rumps if you have to, if you're eating Ramen.

      In the end, I don't mean to insult you if your situation is hard. But I'm not going to accept BS, either. If you're not in the sticks where there's no market-- if you are somewhere where there's Best Buy and Comp USA-- then surely, you can still find people with money, who will pay Best Buy if they have no other choice, and take that business. And provide a better value.

      As far as this guy-- c'mon. Your proposition is silly. The US Federal government is a damn Dilbert mess, sure, but if they could hire a US-native programmer for the same price (don't assume this guy is a low-ball salary) or even 50% more, they'd probably do so. The talent isn't there.

      Of course, that's also a failure of the US Educational system. I'm probably more pissed than you about that, and I understand that the US isn't providing as much educational investment and opportunity for young people, as, for instance, China. But the young in the US also have an enormous sense of entitlement, of wishing and thinking they should get something for nothing.

      I worked hard in College and grad school. I put in the 80+ hour weeks, and I still do. I've lived in CA-- if you can't downsize enough to live on $45K in the Mission, or Berkeley (or the burbs), c'mon, $45K is still a lot of money. I've made 100x that in a year, and I've lived on a quarter of that in other years. Adjust to your means and make the best of it-- if you can't pull in $45K, then don't try to live a $45K lifesytle.

    5. Re:CALING BS (AGAIN) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You've made 4.5 million dollars per year and you are offering to transfer files for your local bartender for $200 ?

  28. Critical to Security -- what?!?! by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    >FBI Assistant Director in Charge Janice K. Fedarcyk [said] “His intentions with regard to that software are immaterial.
    >Stealing it and copying it threatened the security of vitally important source code.”

    And what's so important about the security of accounting code? Would it be so bad if this were open source-- heck, the whole process, so that citizens could actually see the financial operations and transactions of Federal Agencies, before tens of millions get embezzelled or spent in boondoggles...

    *light comes on.*

    Ok, got it.

  29. What, no Ron Paul jokes? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    What's up with that? Slashdotters are losing their edge.

    1. Re:What, no Ron Paul jokes? by electron+sponge · · Score: 1

      Yeah the joke is that there are no jokes. There's really not much to laugh about.

      If only people knew what the Federal Reserve was, what it did, and how it affected their everyday life without any oversight from their elected representatives. Around a fifth of Americans are already aware, and that number is growing. They aren't devoted to Republicans or Democrats. They are simply aware. These people may disagree on how to solve the problem but the key thing is, they see there is a huge problem. Things are going to get fixed, eventually.

      Whether you frame it around Ron Paul or not, a lot of people can see that our problems seem to be stemming from the central bank, and that before we can even begin to fix the problem we need to know EXACTLY what they've been up to. This has been a big problem for a long time. Our representatives have had very little power to compel the Fed to open its books up. Thanks to folks like Dennis Kucinich, Bernie Sanders, Ron Paul, and others, we've gotten a very ugly glimpse. We need to see the whole picture, though. Americans need to know why their currency is being inflated. (And before anyone says 'uh inflation isn't happening' let's just remember that we've moved the goalposts on that metric just as we have our cost of living and unemployment. Lies, damned lies and statistics.)

  30. Re:With people like these... by hitmark · · Score: 2

    then USA has a very serious problem on their hands.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  31. Re:why isn't it open anyway? by TheMathemagician · · Score: 1

    Of course you're correct. The Fed isn't in the business of software development and all their code could be open (as opposed to their data). It would be fun project to force this to happen in all goverment departments because of all the screaming and invalid arguments that would ensue but forcing a clean separation between code and data would be extremely beneficial.

  32. fixed it for you by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

    but is nothing close to the millions you can steal on Wall Street.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  33. I'm surprised he got away with it by msobkow · · Score: 1

    When I worked for J. P. Morgan before the Chase merger and for a year afterwards, security was so tight I can't think of any way I COULD have stolen code if I wanted to. I don't think my PC even had a floppy drive or a USB port, and everything was on servers, not local machines. Even the MS Access '98 code I wrote resided on servers, though I did have edit copies on my local hard drive.

    I went through the usual security checks -- fingerprint submissions to police, FBI, and CIA, etc. Those checks are pretty thorough, so even on that basis I'm surprised a thief was able to sneak through the security protocols.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  34. Re:With people like these... by Mitreya · · Score: 1
    It should have been 'Programmer Steals Code ..' Not 'Chinese Programmer Steals Code ...'

    Well, to be fair, the fact that he is not a US-citizen seems relevant. I am not the first to express surprise that a foreign worker was hired and had access to something so sensitive. I seem to remember that even federal internships often require citizenship. A lot easier to check US-citizen background when hiring, I imagine.

  35. Lack of talent? No, lack of exploitable Americans by BVis · · Score: 1

    After reading comments about how there are no Americans talented or qualified enough to fill this position, I have to point something out:

    There are plenty of American software engineers that could do this job. There aren't plenty of American software engineers that could do this job for the crap pay they were most likely offering. It's not a matter of unwillingness, it's a matter of being able to support a family in the current environment. Corporations whine and whine about no talent being available, but what they really mean is 'there's no talent available that will work for the insulting wages we're offering, so let us hire H1Bs for pennies on the dollar who can't complain or they get deported.' Not only do they save money, they get an employee that they can more easily work into the ground than an American citizen.

    The H1B system is a cruel joke perpetrated on the American worker. And before some capitalist-is-awesome-fuck-you moron says that it would kill jobs, no, it would just shrink corporate profits to the point where they make 7 kajillion dollars instead of 9.

    Also, IMHO, any entity that hires contractors to do mission critical work instead of hiring full-time employees deserves everything they get.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  36. What could go wrong? by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

    I'm not talking about guild or innocence here but; They outsourced this important coding job to a Chinese man. Is he the only one who could do it, or was he the cheapest?

    If Americans are given good jobs, opportunity and hope for the future -- there's a good chance to expect loyalty and honor from happy citizens.

    If you want to replace that model with; "We will bargain you down to the lowest common-denominator on the planet" then you really, really have to beef up security because you can trust them only slightly more than they can trust you. Holy crap!

    >> When November of 2008 financial collapse rolled around (inevitably), some Bonds rating companies were giving their consulting clients AAA ratings on whatever they pushed out because consulting made more money than bond rating. The Big Banks got around protections for consumers by using smaller banks to collect the sub-par loans with no questions asked (they were not forced in the SLIGHTEST by anti-red lining laws, contrary to Rush Limbaugh and his minions).

    Ultimately, all these "Job Creators" can't really trust each other -- because there are no suckers left. It's only sharks in them thar waters and there is nothing left for bottom feeders but the blood.

    >> The Federal Reserve (which has no oversight and isn't government), outsourced a job to a non-American, and likely he already sent a good portion of the code and the Fed's security procedures to China. Dig in fella's, this is how you enjoy just desserts -- and you thought you only had to worry about Occupy Wall Street? Heh.

    --
    >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  37. Stealing? by mothlos · · Score: 1

    So, the DOJ used to have code and no longer does? How much effort is it going to take to recreate this stolen code?

    Seriously, folks. We need to start using more descriptive vocabulary to differentiate between 'taking something away from somebody' and 'duplicating something'. These have very different outcomes and should have different name space. 'Copy' is the term that I prefer.

  38. The reason why he was caught.. by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

    He was only suspected for theft after he tried to change name.

    Ka Ching!

  39. Oh Yeah, Sure... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Like the government is really doing government wide accounting and reporting...... Since when?

    And I guy gets busted for using the code the tax payers paid for to teach? now its starting to sound more real.

    Clearly its would have been only a matter of time before some student figured out the flaws in the system which those in government would manipulate to hide where tax payer money is really going.

    Ultimately the question is..... Why is it proprietary? Considering its paid for by the tax payers who really do have a right and duty to know what their government is doing with the the peoples tax dollar..

    For those who want to question the Peoples Rights and Duty...... When was the last time you read the Declaration of Independence? Maybe its time for you to read it again.

  40. Re:With people like these... by lgarner · · Score: 1

    Apparently, he wasn't.

  41. Re:Lack of talent? No, lack of exploitable America by Shados · · Score: 1

    We're having trouble hiring here. The job is fun, the salary is in 6 figures, but we need a lot of people and there's lots of competition. Often, bad candidates get jobs before we even get a chance to talk to them. Out of state candidates usually don't want to move even with generous compensation.

    We only have a single H1B, and the guy is really, really good (and paid accordingly. No money saving there).

    Just saying that depending where you're located, if the demand is high, it can be REALLY hard to find good candidates. Most devs who think they're good are terrible.

  42. About the turning point by ale2011 · · Score: 1

    It is great news that people opt to steal code rather than money, even from banks. I look forward to replacing conservation laws with suitable information-based statements, for a coherent vision of the universe.