Slashdot Mirror


Launch Your Own Nanosatellite Into Space

First time accepted submitter Rozine writes "Ever wanted to launch your own satellite into space? Thanks to a project at the Cornell Space Science Lab, now you can. In the words of the grad student leading the project, Zac Manchester, 'What better way of showing off your uber-geek credentials than having your own spacecraft?' Zac hopes that by shrinking the size of each spacecraft and using advancements in computer and solar cell technology, satellites can follow the path of the personal computer revolution, opening up space for the masses. For small donations you will receive mementos, but for $300 and up you will get your very own satellite to be launched into space. Perfect for slashdotters and school projects everywhere!" We covered this project in its infancy back in July. I'm glad to see it gained traction.

15 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. Great!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even more "space junk".

    1. Re:Great!!! by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pretty much what sibling said. These creatures will likely be launched into very low Earth orbit, and will likely hit re-entry in less than a couple months at most. A "nanosatellite" won't have any attitude control, or any fuel for that matter. It won't have the means to alter whatever orbit (and subsequent decay) it may get kicked off into.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Great!!! by Cwix · · Score: 5, Informative

      They are aiming for an orbit time of a few days to a few weeks until they reenter and burn up upon reentry. They are doing that specifically so they don't leave any space junk.

      RTFA.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    3. Re:Great!!! by grouchomarxist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When it goes from 'having your own spacecraft' to 'had a short-lived spacecraft' it becomes much less uber-geek cred.

    4. Re:Great!!! by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Burn up? Not a chance! My experimental payload would consist of tiny aero-dynamic "anagyre skipping stone" devices made of satellite piercing ceramic materials that will boomerang into higher, stable, orbits! Muhahahhaaahaha!

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    5. Re:Great!!! by mykepredko · · Score: 5, Funny

      You make it sound like for 300 bucks, you should get your own shark in space, with a frickin' laser on it no less!

    6. Re:Great!!! by daktari · · Score: 5, Funny

      Attitude control is what I like to see engineered, not merely just in our nanosatellites, but pretty much in all our tech devices.

      --
      A fool sees not the same tree that a wise man sees. -- Willam Blake
    7. Re:Great!!! by sulimma · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. In movies like "Dark Star" or "2001" we see what can happen if you do not have proper attitude control in your spacecraft.
      They start to argue, refuse to take orders or just get lazy.

  2. Re:Space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    that was my first thought. the last thing we need is thousands of geeks launching their own space junk.

    If you had clicked on the link...

    "Because we will only launch KickSat into a low-altitude orbit, we can guarantee that all of the Sprites will re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere within a few days or weeks, leaving no trace of space debris. KickSat itself will last somewhat longer, but should burn up in the atmosphere within a few months."

  3. Piratebay by koan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are you listening? This is your satellite idea come to fruition.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  4. what about a bigger shared sat? by unrtst · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This junk it'll be sending up is damn near useless. They want to see how well the electronics hold up in space... for a few days before re-entry, with no ability to query them, and just a very short message sent (on repeat?) via radio?

    IMO, I'd rather rent a timeslice on something even a tad more advanced. Long term goal is more interesting, and I realize the first launch is mostly proof-of-concept, but that's an expensive proof for something that can obviously be done. I'd be nice if the larger donations got better kicksat boards at least.

    It wouldn't surprise me if there are other projects out there he could team up with that would love to do some swarm robotics up there that wouldn't cost a whole lot more for the individual parts, but could at least make use of there being 100-1000 of them in near proximity in space.

    Further off on a tangent.... I was kinda hoping to see a cheaper launch vehicle for microsats. Maybe a combo of weather balloon and rocket that goes off once it hits near-max-height?

  5. Can it be made to SURVIVE re-entry? by wisebabo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know how flexible (if at all) the parameters are for your very own "chip" sized satellite but wouldn't it be possible to make it survive re-entry? If it were made of ceramic and light (not dense) enough, couldn't it be designed to "gently" de-orbit without building up the heat that would cause it to vaporize.

    Shape might be important too, I understand how that the first space capsule designers were initially flumoxed be the inability of their needle nosed re-entry vehicles to survive more than a few seconds in the hypersonic wind tunnels before melting. Then, a clue from nature in the form of Tektites; spherical blobs of glass of extraterrestrial origin that managed to survive due to the shock wave that protected them. (Russian re-entry vehicles were spherical for a time, now I think they, like the Americans, are using blunt cones). So if they can't be flat, maybe you'll have to take the space of a few "chip" sized satellites to send one golf-ball sized satellite capable of re-entry.

    What a scoop that would be if you could do this! Imagine a worldwide competition for "find the space golf ball" where the person who finds the (hopefully) intact ceramic ball will get a reward and fame. (There could be a code inside to verify the winner, or perhaps DeBeers would sponsor putting a nice diamond in it). If constructed properly, it could be made to float so a water landing wouldn't automatically lose it. Maybe some sort of retro-reflector could be used to make finding it easier as well (but would restrict the likely recovery teams to professionals).

    Actually since the chance of finding one old be so small, I'd imagine you'd have to send up a bunch with the first one found getting the big reward. Still finding any of them would be a great collectors item! Finally there might be some (very small) uses for being able to return (very small) samples from space but because of the difficulty in finding it, it's probably best suited for some sort of game or promotional event.

    1. Re:Can it be made to SURVIVE re-entry? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "...best suited for some sort of game or promotional event."

      The rest of the world is just thrilled at the chance of a high-velocity bullet vaporising their skull at any instant or location, all for the sake of some game or promotional event

    2. Re:Can it be made to SURVIVE re-entry? by ChatHuant · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know how flexible (if at all) the parameters are for your very own "chip" sized satellite but wouldn't it be possible to make it survive re-entry?

      There's my chance to beat the world record for longest drop of an egg without breaking!

  6. Re:Space Junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, has anybody mentioned the Space Junk problem yet?