The Boston Marathon demonstrates without question that he is not correct.
Didn't you read the intro? After attempting to wipe away some spittle from his masticating apparatus, his cog webbed negatron brain caused him to clearly utter: "I would argue that what effectiveness we have seen to date is totally irrelevant to how effective it might be in the future."
But I think he was referring to his own capacity of clear thought.
Teenage girls? For some reason I'm always tempted to attribute those astonishingly backward comments containing "retard/faggot/nigger/etc" words to the mindset of pimply pubescent BOYS utterly lacking any grace, respect or self worth. Sort of like tagging walls to prove that your existence is not futile, and that you do matter (despite your alcoholic deadbeat parents stating otherwise). Perhaps you're right, and it's been girls spilling their bile all along.
It will be interesting to see who self starters w/ their $100 degrees are likely to hire when they start becoming successful. Would they hire the folks with the same $100 degree or the folks who are part of the much more expensive "insider" system?
I love the way you start your post with utmost respect... Such a charming enlighten'd brain you must have -- you definitely make me want to vote for whomever you are supporting.
a mechanism that people can reasonably expect should work on the largest social networking provider in existence at the moment.
You are not Facebook's customer, you are Facebook's product. Facebook will care for their product (=you) only just enough to prevent you from leaving.
Facebook is more a "giant private data collection vortex" than a "social networking provider". It monetises your data and gives you enough "tools" to voluntary share as much personal stuff as they can get away with, leaving you with the illusion that you've gained the upper hand in this exchange.
A patent pool company (until now unbeknown to me) that has registered the bootstrap "the standard for standards". The horror...the horror.
If their website is anything to go by, they make themselves look like foolish small fish. But I guess, to be trading water in the patent pool, one has to have larger shark fins. I could be mistaken though.
We, as small time tech entrepreneurs, will be able to rest assured that we shall only be sued by either Apple, Microsoft or Google (or a combination of these). That should simplify matters.
That's about the only thing a sociopath fears. That's why the "threat" of video documentation is so effective.
Agreed. But I think we're getting some things backwards: ethical people have little to fear re becoming front page copy since their ethical actions are generally not deemed "news worthy". If however, a sociopath decides not to do something out of fear of being caught it has little to do with his/her burdened conscious.
Backwards, as if Descartes would have said: I am, therefore I think. And we all know that not always to be the case.
That's Business Ethics 101 - if you're doing something at work that you wouldn't want posted on the front page of the local newspapers, don't do it.
Your statement has very little to do with ethics per se. Our society allows for plenty of ethically dubious stuff to go down while still perfectly okay to land the front page.
I guess, your statement has more to do with simply not wanting to get caught than being ethical.
I've been blocking Google Analytics for years now (simple addition to my "host" file).
Even as a web developer I have long since wondered about both the ethics involved in letting Google track your visitors and the usefulness of this--some folks seem to go completely bat shit crazy over stats rather than focussing on presenting a decent value proposition to their (potential) clients.
"Yeah. That's it. (barfs)" And then Archer left the bar. Picking up this lady now seemed a lost cause.
The Boston Marathon demonstrates without question that he is not correct.
Didn't you read the intro? After attempting to wipe away some spittle from his masticating apparatus, his cog webbed negatron brain caused him to clearly utter: "I would argue that what effectiveness we have seen to date is totally irrelevant to how effective it might be in the future."
But I think he was referring to his own capacity of clear thought.
Where is there fine.
There fine is probably over their.
Teenage girls? For some reason I'm always tempted to attribute those astonishingly backward comments containing "retard/faggot/nigger/etc" words to the mindset of pimply pubescent BOYS utterly lacking any grace, respect or self worth. Sort of like tagging walls to prove that your existence is not futile, and that you do matter (despite your alcoholic deadbeat parents stating otherwise). Perhaps you're right, and it's been girls spilling their bile all along.
It will be interesting to see who self starters w/ their $100 degrees are likely to hire when they start becoming successful. Would they hire the folks with the same $100 degree or the folks who are part of the much more expensive "insider" system?
I love the way you start your post with utmost respect... Such a charming enlighten'd brain you must have -- you definitely make me want to vote for whomever you are supporting.
right now I'm too busy fucking your mom.......
I guess that answers the question whether or not you were dropped on your head as a child.
a mechanism that people can reasonably expect should work on the largest social networking provider in existence at the moment.
You are not Facebook's customer, you are Facebook's product. Facebook will care for their product (=you) only just enough to prevent you from leaving.
Facebook is more a "giant private data collection vortex" than a "social networking provider". It monetises your data and gives you enough "tools" to voluntary share as much personal stuff as they can get away with, leaving you with the illusion that you've gained the upper hand in this exchange.
This faggot gives me a case of Tourette
You seem intelligent, but your use of the word "faggot" spoils the effect.
The first there and/or with tech to quickly get there and utilize any game changing discovery will greatly benefit.
Provided they don't bankrupt themselves in the process.
and pass the ammo...
If you don't bother starting your sentences with capitals, I shan't bother reading your post. Respect your readers and they shall read...
A patent pool company (until now unbeknown to me) that has registered the bootstrap "the standard for standards". The horror...the horror.
If their website is anything to go by, they make themselves look like foolish small fish. But I guess, to be trading water in the patent pool, one has to have larger shark fins. I could be mistaken though.
We, as small time tech entrepreneurs, will be able to rest assured that we shall only be sued by either Apple, Microsoft or Google (or a combination of these). That should simplify matters.
Sweet! I am so getting into the tinfoil overall business. Just think of all the people who would care about this very issue! Oh wait...
If I could mod you up past 5/funny, I would. Thanks for making us laugh.
Think about this technology in the hands of entities far more dangerous than merchants; law enforcement, for example.
More dangerous than merchants? Is that even possible?
Looks like another example of technology catching up with our greed.
That's about the only thing a sociopath fears. That's why the "threat" of video documentation is so effective.
Agreed. But I think we're getting some things backwards: ethical people have little to fear re becoming front page copy since their ethical actions are generally not deemed "news worthy". If however, a sociopath decides not to do something out of fear of being caught it has little to do with his/her burdened conscious.
Backwards, as if Descartes would have said: I am, therefore I think. And we all know that not always to be the case.
That's Business Ethics 101 - if you're doing something at work that you wouldn't want posted on the front page of the local newspapers, don't do it.
Your statement has very little to do with ethics per se. Our society allows for plenty of ethically dubious stuff to go down while still perfectly okay to land the front page.
I guess, your statement has more to do with simply not wanting to get caught than being ethical.
You sound like it's a certainty that the coalition will get back in. I'm not so sure. After all, Abbott is leading the party...
Whereas you're clearly doing great things with your life.....
Thanks AC. You've restored my "miserably failing" faith in the institution of AC posting by putting a smile right where it belongs: on my face!
Yep, and weren't we promised that we could hang on to our shitty jobs ?
Rumblefish, these slimy pieces of shit who are probably well-known child molestors (the reason for their secrecy)
Child molestors? WTF??? Do you know something that I don't? Care to elaborate?
I've been blocking Google Analytics for years now (simple addition to my "host" file).
Even as a web developer I have long since wondered about both the ethics involved in letting Google track your visitors and the usefulness of this--some folks seem to go completely bat shit crazy over stats rather than focussing on presenting a decent value proposition to their (potential) clients.
Exactly when a loading page should be redrawn on screen is configurable in Opera. Options are:
Ah, drillers thinking with their drill bits...