Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Party Releases Book of Pirate Politics

ktetch-pirate writes "If the SOPA/PIPA blackouts were a wakeup call to many people, then the U.S. Pirate Party has released a book that might help explain some of the issues. The book covers issues such as Corporate Personhood, the 4th Amendment, the history of copyright, and how DRM laws are made. There are even cartoons from Nina Paley throughout to add a bit of humor. DRM-free eBook versions are available to download from the book's site, or you can buy a paperback edition from Amazon for ten bucks." The book is under the CC BY-NC-SA, and features essays from the likes of Lawrence Lessig and Rick Falkvinge.

31 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. Y'ar they be no true pirates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    True pirates only believe in a keg of rum and a fair splittin' o' the booty!

    1. Re:Y'ar they be no true pirates! by Tuoqui · · Score: 3, Informative

      Link to the torrent file for those who hit the slashdotted website. Viva La Bittorrent!

      http://bit.ly/x5gtHe

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    2. Re:Y'ar they be no true pirates! by Brad1138 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Y'ar they be no true pirates!"

      Hence global warming...

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  2. Running through my head... by sonoftheright · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... are thoughts concerning the possible destruction of the universe were I to pirate the Pirate Party's book on Pirate Politics.

    1. Re:Running through my head... by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pretty sure that's why it's DRM-free. For the sake of the Universe.

  3. Fair day's pay for fair day's work by Kevin+McCready · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hopefully we might one day move towards the revolutionary notion of a fair day's pay for a fair day's work. Yes I know it's terribly problematic determining the parameters, but if the principle was accepted we'd be a lot further ahead.

    1. Re:Fair day's pay for fair day's work by davester666 · · Score: 2

      False. We must all work to support the ability for individuals to become billionaires.

      Of course, don't tell anybody that for one person to become a billionaire, a WHOLE LOTTA people have to be zeroinares.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Fair day's pay for fair day's work by Flammon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly! Doing something once and getting paid a hundred million times for it is a loophole in our system and it desperately needs to be fixed. Sadly the people who took advantage of this loophole have made enough money which has given them power to control the goverment and preserve the loophole.

    3. Re:Fair day's pay for fair day's work by LordLucless · · Score: 2

      Yes, don't. Especially since it's wrong.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:Fair day's pay for fair day's work by Fned · · Score: 5, Insightful

      1) Because it produces no value. Copyright is meant to encourage the creation of new works by rewarding the creator, rewarding the creator is not the end goal. There is some encouragement provided by creators seeing a tiny, tiny percentage of other creators become rich, but that effect is more than nullified by the chilling effect of big media locking down the public domain for ever and ever. Eventually, no one will be able to create anything new without paying someone a fee based on some ancient crap no one except the rights-holder remembers.

      2) Because copyright as it currently stands is incompatible with computers. Copyright seeks to monetize individual packets of information, and individual packets of information inside a computer system have zero value; in fact, individual packets of information in a computer can't even be made to have value without breaking the computer, since all a computer actually does is separate information from permanent media so that you can copy, destroy, or muck about with it at no cost.
      Copies mean nothing in Computerland, only creation and access have value.

    5. Re:Fair day's pay for fair day's work by jd2112 · · Score: 2

      Exactly! Doing something once and getting paid a hundred million times for it is a loophole in our system and it desperately needs to be fixed.

      Why?

      It's called "The Golden Rule". He who has the gold makes the rules.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    6. Re:Fair day's pay for fair day's work by Fned · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nearly everyone involved with actually making movies -- directors, actors, crew, caterers, editors, foley artists, stuntmen, gophers -- gets paid once for each movie.

      So, I rather suspect the ticket price would be exactly what it is now, except everyone who wants to see the film would need to buy a ticket before the movie starts getting made.

      The parasites that actually DO get paid over and over, and then cook the books so that it looks like they're not making a profit and therefore don't have to pay anyone royalties? Those guys? They'd be fucked. Everyone else from the scriptwriter to the moviegoer would be just fine.

      This idea that copies are worth something is an idea that people are going to have to learn to let go of if they want to join the rest of us here in the computer age.

    7. Re:Fair day's pay for fair day's work by brit74 · · Score: 2

      > You can charge a subscription
      You mean like online newspapers?

      you can charge for live performances
      Yes, I should've thought about performing software and movies sooner.

      you can charge for merchandise
      We're going to fund my next romantic comedy movie by selling action figures!

      you can rely on people paying because it's the right thing to do (a la that one radiohead album).
      You mean that one stunt that they said they're never going to repeat again? http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9932361-7.html

      Or you can do something like a patronage system, or work as a commercial artist.
      Please mister, will you fund the next big videogame / movie? It'll cost millions of dollars, but you'll be providing society with free entertainment. Surely you don't have anything better to do with that money.

    8. Re:Fair day's pay for fair day's work by Flammon · · Score: 2

      That's how the system is supposed to work and if it did, I'd have no problem with it. Unfortunately, that's not how it works. It's much more complex than that and you're seeing exactly what they want you to see. You say that Starcraft 2 would not have been created because nobody is going to pay $100 million but that's not true. I didn't pay for Starcraft 2 until it was finished and the $100 million had already been paid for. Who do you think paid that money up front? Honest gamers? Nope. Investors. Most of which will never play the game. These investors will try to squeeze as much money out of you as possible and sue anyone who stands in their way. They couldn't care less about the game, who is making it or who is playing it. They just want to create money without ever lifting a finger. The only work they do is lobby the government for laws that keep their unfair money making scheme running.

    9. Re:Fair day's pay for fair day's work by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      You can charge a subscription, you can charge for live performances, you can charge for merchandise, you can rely on people paying because it's the right thing to do (a la that one radiohead album). You can charge for added value, like the convenience of having a large collection (Netflix). Or you can do something like a patronage system, or work as a commercial artist.

      You're not a creative artist are you?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  4. Education by omganton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have been waiting for this. Blackouts and protests can raise awareness, but those interested yet lacking knowledge require a targeted repository of information on the issues at hand. The distribution of knowledge is the best way to prepare the masses for the lengthy and technical debates that are sure to arise regarding SOPA/PIPA in the following years.

    1. Re:Education by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've been waiting for it too.

      The book is under the CC BY-NC-SA

      Ha! I'm going to sell it without attribution. What are you going to do about it, Pirate Party?!

    2. Re:Education by Tokolosh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Put it on Megapload.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    3. Re:Education by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ha! I'm going to sell it without attribution. What are you going to do about it, Pirate Party?!

      The Pirate Party opposes the present understanding of copyright, but it does not oppose the moral right of the author to be credited. It can be argued that copyright is a recent innovation (the early US legislation noted that it is a government fiat to spur creation, not a natural right) and alien to most people, but claims that authors have the right to be credited stretch far back into antiquity.

      Basically, copyright violation and plagiarism are two different issues.

    4. Re:Education by ktetch-pirate · · Score: 3, Informative

      DANGIT! We're gong to get the site back up ASAP! Meantime - Torrent - http://bit.ly/x5gtHe TXT - http://bit.ly/xrPGl5 ODT - http://bit.ly/zC6TE1 RTF - http://bit.ly/xHI7MO PDF - http://bit.ly/xVI0t1 MOBI - http://bit.ly/wtYRQQ EPUB - http://bit.ly/zt99zw

    5. Re:Education by polymeris · · Score: 2

      Suprisingly, that actually is the book. No goatse or cheap luxury handbags.

    6. Re:Education by ktetch-pirate · · Score: 2

      I'm not a dick like that. I't's my submission to slashdot. Thus I've got a vested interest in making sure y'all get the book!

  5. Re:...and Slashdot Takes It Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Enjoy http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.nosafeharbor.com/get&hl=en&strip=1

  6. Re:Cool! by Rostis · · Score: 2

    That's a license, not a copyright. The copyright is by default.

  7. Idealism vs Reality by Brain-Fu · · Score: 2

    The value of a unit of work entirely depends upon the perceptions of the people who benefit from said work. As such, it varies with many variables, including location, culture, material availability, labor availability, alternative benefit availability, time, etc.

    It is very easy to deem that someone else is overpaid because of the low value their output has to you personally, without taking into account the high value it may have to the people who are actually paying for it. The opposite is also true.

    The matter is further complicated by the possibility of economic predation, where people can position themselves so as to be able to force the extraction of pay that is way beyond the value provided in anyone's perception. Though this is the most visible and most hated issue driving income inequality, the other variables contribute just as significantly to the imbalances (or the incorrect perception thereof).

  8. Re:Corporate Personhood, worst conspiracy ever by pugugly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This neat theory that corporate personhood was a badly phrased but highly meaningless concept vanished the instant the Supreme Court extended the protections of freedom of speech to corporations. Combined with money == speech, corporations have rights unmatched by any but the wealthiest Citizens.

    But thank you for playing and here's your copy of the home game

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  9. Re:Slashdotted... if only... by ktetch-pirate · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's available on torrent. We're using the canadian pirate party's CaPT torrent tracker. Magnet is magnet:?xt=urn:btih:79ADFF2965C672CC66F2AD54D67857BD3BAEEC61&dn=NoSafeHarbor_eBooks-USPirateParty&tr=http%3a//www.pirateparty.ca/tracker/announce.php OR the torrent file is http://bit.ly/x5gtHe Keep track of @nosafeharbor for more info

  10. Re:Cool! by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The primary goal is copyright reform, not abolishment.
    Copyright isn't evil; it's just being abused heavily.

  11. Not particularly good by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I read the first few essays and, though I agree with the sentiments therein, I found most of them rather poorly written - either unsure of their target (e.g., most non-computer-geek persons will not know what a "zombie botnet" is and how it relates to DNS, which is also not described) or incredibly dense in legality or just scattered (jumping from point-to-point with little connection). As a document, the whole thing would be unreadable by the normal man on the street. If you actually want a good example of what a publisher and the editorial services they should provide bring to the table, you need do little more than try to read this document. The distance between where this document is and where it should be to be effective (which should demonstrate the amount of work it would take to bridge the gap) is also a good indicator as to why these intermediaries deserve to be paid for these efforts.

    If you want to kill copyright, you should put out a document showing that the services of those paid by copyright is no longer necessary. This document, though heartfelt, is crap.

    --
    That is all.
  12. Why -NC ? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2

    That seems fundamentally wrong to put a -nc there.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  13. Re:RANSOMWARE (KICKSTARTER model) by Flammon · · Score: 2

    Kickstarter is a great model to follow and I'd love to see our system move towards something like it. If we could just demote greed from our culture a little, we'll get there eventually.