Slashdot Mirror


Monty Python Crew To Reunite For Movie

dutchwhizzman writes "The surviving members of Monty Python have announced they will make a new movie. It will be titled Absolutely Anything. Graham Chapman won't be there to join them anymore, but they think the movie will still be in the spirit of Life of Brian, The Meaning of Life and other movies they made in the past."

12 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. They should call it "The Spanish Inquisition"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... because none of us expected it.

  2. It shouldn't be in the spirit of Life of Brian... by alaffin · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it should be something completely different

  3. why no chapman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and why is Graham Chapman not joining them?

    1. Re:why no chapman! by newcastlejon · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and why is Graham Chapman not joining them?

      Death can put a real crimp on your acting ability. That is unless your name is Keanu, in which case being stiff as a board is an absolute boon.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    2. Re:why no chapman! by Antarius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Interviewer: (Michael Palin) An excerpt from Carl French's latest film. Carl, we're all a little mystified by your claim that your new film stars Marilyn Monroe.

      Carl French: (Graham Chapman) It does, yes.

      Interviewer: Who died over ten years ago?

      Carl French: Uh, that's correct.

      Interviewer: Are you lying?

      Carl French: No, no, it's just that she'e very much in the public eye at the moment.

      Interviewer: Does she have a big part?

      Carl French: She is the star of the film.

      Interviewer: And dead.

      Carl French: Well, we dug her up and gave her a screen test, a mere formality in her case, and...

      Interviewer: Can she still act?

      Carl French: Well... well, she-she's still has this-this enormous, ah-ah, kinda indefinable, uh... no.

      Interviewer: Was decomposition a problem?

      Carl French: We did have to put her in the fridge between takes.

      Interviewer: Ah, what sorts of things does she do in the film?

      Carl French: Well, we had her lying on beds, lying on floors, falling out of cupboards, scaring the children...

      Interviewer: But surely Miss Monroe was cremated?

      Carl French: Well, we had to use a standin for some of the more visible shots.

      Interviewer: Ah! Uh, another actress.

      Carl French: Dead actress. But Monroe was in shot the whole time.

      Interviewer: How?

      Carl French: Oh, in the ash tray, in the fire grate and vacuum cleaner...




      How appropriate would it be for them to give him Credit like that?!

  4. I personally think they shouldn't by Alworx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally I think they shouldn't.

    Maybe author a movie, but not star in it. They where great at the time (70's and 80's) but now they would risk looking outdated and desperately trying to cling to some sort of success.

    So either produce something truly "completely different", or no. Leave those outstanding movies (and of course TV sketches) as they where. Don't do a "Godfather III" or a "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" or a "Blues Brothers 2000" (and on). Please.

    Bugger.

  5. I knew this was inevitable... by superdude72 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...from the moment John Cleese's divorce was final and his ex-wife got half of everything. Woo hoo! Shortly after there was a new Monty Python documentary, and now this.

  6. as you age, you have less time to contribute art by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    aging celebrities know this. musicians, actors know that they only have so much time left.

    why not put some more art out there while you still can? I hate to sound morbid but those guys only have a few years left and I'd love to have them put more of their comedy into the world before they go.

    its the same way that many older 70's/80's rock musicians are coming back to do a high-def video concert tour. most of their older work was not video recorded (or not done well) and it would be nice to have at least a few HD moments to savor of them, for posterity. its not 'the same' as the old days but its far better than NOT having it! you can always choose to not view it, but if they choose to not produce it, neither of us have a choice.

    so, kudos to them for wanting to throw some more of their artful style out into the world before they push up the daiseys.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  7. Resurrect Chapman by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Instead of Robin Williams as a talking dog (ugh), splice together Chapman's voice from all his films and Monty Python episodes (like South Park and Chef) for that role. Then sprinkle photos of Chapman in his various outlandish outfits throughout the movie without making a direct reference to them.

    I can dream. Feverish dreams.

  8. Re:They should call it "The Spanish Inquisition".. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, I can imagine that the title isn't actually "Absolutely Anything", but that "absolutely anything" is what they answered when asked what the title might be.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  9. It's a Terry Jones film with Python voice actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry to be a buzzkill, but it looks like it'll be just a movie by Terry Jones with the other Pythons being voice actors and nothing more. Heck, Terry Jones himself said that "It's not a Monty Python picture".http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-16744299 None of the other Pythons are involved in the writing process.

  10. Re:It shouldn't be in the spirit of Life of Brian. by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My favorite sketch is, however, a Chapman sketch, and that's the still very shocking Undertaker Sketch, which Chapman deliberately wrote to be as appalling as possible. During his alcoholic years he was indeed far too unreliable to ever take the lead, and in fact according to Cleese it got so bad that that was why left and did the first Fawlty Towers series.

    But it was very much Chapman's sense of the bizarre that was used so effectively. He may not have been the out-and-out creative force that the others were, but I doubt the Python's would have seemed very much like the Python's without him. He was of the same kind of anarchic breed as the Python's idol, Spike Milligan (another brilliant comedian and writer who had his own terrible demons).

    They all served their function, and that's what makes any potential reunions seem somewhat underwhelming to me. If Idle's not involved, then you lose that element of it, and if Gilliam isn't involved, then you lose that sort of hallucinatory visual style. Python really is a very good example of how the sum is greater than the parts. They've all gone one and done some rather good things (yes, I even enjoyed Yellow Beard), but only Gilliam has ever managed to achieve things that came close to equaling his brilliance in Python.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.