Slashdot Mirror


Gates Paying Murdoch For System To Track U.S. Kids' School Progress

theodp writes "Discussing U.S. education in his 2012 Annual Letter, Bill Gates notes the importance of 'tools and services [that] have the added benefit of providing amazing visibility into how each individual student is progressing, and generating lots of useful data that teachers can use to improve their own effectiveness.' Well, Bill is certainly putting his millions where his mouth is. The Gates Foundation has ponied up $76.5 million for a controversial student data tracking initiative that's engaged Rupert Murdoch's Wireless Generation to 'build the open software that will allow states to access a shared, performance-driven marketplace of free and premium tools and content.' If you live in CO, IL, NC, NY, MA, LA, GA, or DE, it's coming soon to a public school near you."

182 comments

  1. Shitstorm inc. by durrr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Through a bug it will track their physical location, everything they say, and what websites they visit. And their parents while at it.

    1. Re:Shitstorm inc. by stewart4t2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I do believe that's counted as a feature.

    2. Re:Shitstorm inc. by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Through a bug it will track their physical location, everything they say, and what websites they visit. And their parents while at it.

      That's what Facebook is for.

    3. Re:Shitstorm inc. by camperslo · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, well this could be the start of something big. Companies could pick who to own by financing their educations, who to move to the front lines, and who is best suited as an organ donor. Companies could also aid only those who agree with their agendas. Combined with some genetic engineering, there's great opportunity for corporate optimizations here... or a script for a sci-fi movie/series??

      (I release any interest I have in this idea for free use by any filmmaker not connected with Comcast)

    4. Re:Shitstorm inc. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      "Shitstorm Incorporated" will be the name of the company?

    5. Re:Shitstorm inc. by anagama · · Score: 2

      There's a book about that: The Unicorporated Man

      The website for the book is a bit hard to take in:
      http://www.theunincorporatedman.com/

      Wikipedia is a bit thin:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unincorporated_Man

      I enjoyed the book -- audiobook actually, although the second book in the series is read by a different reader which was a totally annoying and ridiculous decision by the publisher -- you spend the first quarter just relearning the characters' voices.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  2. We should already have this. by tidepool · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it just me, or shouldn't we already have this by hiring competent, caring, understanding educators in the first place? Computer software to track an individuals 'performance' (Ie; a 'quantitative thing') is yet another step in the ass-backwardness of the modern educational system.

    Why do we always forget that while test scores are important, they are FAR from the deterministic quality on which to judge an individuals intelligence or desire to learn?

    We have not created successful AI; The human mind stuck inside a quality educator, no matter the level, cannot be boiled down to algorithms and pure statical data-sets.

    But oh how we try. *sigh*.

    1. Re:We should already have this. by sandytaru · · Score: 4, Informative

      We did already have this. It was called report cards, and when I was in K-12 school, it got sent home on paper with me once every six weeks so my parents could look at it and see how I was doing and if necessary ground me for not paying attention in school.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, of course we should. But my favorite quote on this subject was when a group of parents were commiserating about the quality of teachers in their school, one of them said "We're talking about El Ed majors. Don't you remember them when you where in college? El Ed majors!"

      Not that all are bad; I've known some very good teachers, and we lobbied with the Principal to get our children into their classrooms. But they were the exception.

    3. Re:We should already have this. by Shoe+Puppet · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not that all are bad; I've known some very good teachers, and we lobbied with the Principal to get our children into their classrooms

      You're a bunch of bastards for denying the other children the good teachers.

      --
      (+1, Disagree)
    4. Re:We should already have this. by tidepool · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not that all are bad; I've known some very good teachers, and we lobbied with the Principal to get our children into their classrooms. But they were the exception.

      Honestly, and this is just a general assumption (although, I'm sure there is plenty of truth in it):

      They are exceptions because the field pays so LITTLE and seems to be quite hard. (Not the teaching, mind you, but the 'beat down' one gets from Government, Parents, School boards, etc).

      Imagine $76 million dollars to fund MORE / 'Better' teachers? Willing to bet it does more to help the overall economy & education (current AND future, in the same price tag) than buying some silly software that's going to show us that we don't truly care anymore.

    5. Re:We should already have this. by vlm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We did already have this. It was called report cards, and when I was in K-12 school, it got sent home on paper with me once every six weeks so my parents could look at it and see how I was doing and if necessary ground me for not paying attention in school.

      With grade inflation its no longer meaningful. Also its a pretty good form of "stealth ageism". For example I'm old enough (get off my F-ing lawn) that I worked extremely hard to get a B+ in quantitative chemical analysis, lets just say it was long enough ago that we had an admittedly old even in that era apple II for a lab computer for potentiometric electrochemical analysis. Back in ye olden days, a B+ was a pretty strong effort and looks good on my transcript and believe it or not probably curved me up to around the top quartile of the class, I always was a superior chemist even in one of my weaker areas. Compared to a young whipper snapper where as long as you pay the registration office and show up, you're guaranteed an easy "A", that B+ makes me look like the class moron. And that is "stealth ageism" because my numbers make me appear dumber than your average young 4.0 student, but I actually did what would in modern terms be relatively high "A" level work not merely a B+. To figure out I'm a moron you should have to read /., not compare a decades old grades transcript with a modern hyper-inflated grade transcript.

      I've seen this effect with my kids. I used to get the full spectrum of D in gym up to A+ in science, but they only get wishy washy word grades now in grade school, like a checkmark for one of these three "Have not begun this topic" "making progress on this topic" "mastered this topic". I'm told there was a slightly earlier era a decade ago where they exclusively gave out A grade, it was just curved to A- for the morons, plain A for the masses, and A+ for the elite.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:We should already have this. by Peristaltic · · Score: 2

      Is it just me, or shouldn't we already have this by hiring competent, caring, understanding educators in the first place?

      Years before my son reached Middle School, I looked high and low for these people; turns out the only place I was able to find them in Houston was in a private school, being paid what they should be paid.

      While there are a few great teachers scattered randomly throughout HISD, many find themselves, for the most part, saddled with a ridiculous bureaucracy and large class sizes- there's much more to it than finding great teachers. The result is, I spend almost more than I can afford to send my son to a private school.

    7. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Elementary and middle school, not sure. But high school? I don't know how teachers can deal with 150 students. (5 periods times 30 students per period,) Maybe 150 is a bit high, but let's assume 100 to 125 students per teacher. How are they to assign any meaningful work? When do they grade, outside their paid hours?

      If only we could decrease class sizes to 17 students per teacher, with the exception of some subjects. Maybe this in conjunction with two prep periods standard instead of one. Example: a teacher teaching 4 periods of 20 students per period.

      Compare high school homework with the work given in upper-level college classes. While fact learning is important, it's probably better to teach them how to think as opposed to what to think.

      The other problem is time. Do students have enough time to do all the (proposed) homework assigned? At least with college, you only have a few classes to focus on, with most of the day off (unless you work). I don't know a good solution for this other than perhaps a 4 day school week or perhaps a 9 day fortnight.

    8. Re:We should already have this. by vlm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Imagine $76 million dollars to fund MORE / 'Better' teachers? Willing to bet it does more to help the overall economy & education (current AND future, in the same price tag) than buying some silly software that's going to show us that we don't truly care anymore.

      I don't think it would have much effect.

      Half your budget goes to overhead and management right off the top. Darn near a 1:2 administrator / teacher ratio where I live, and administrators get paid more for doing basically nothing productive, and physical plant overhead is quite expensive (imagine what it would cost to rent an office building the size of a school per year). Then lets assume the average teacher pulls down $50K. Yes I'm well aware that their salary model is different than, say, private sector IT, so a newbie teacher starts out at $20K and gets a 5K raise every year for the rest of their career, whereas a IT dude gets $50K the first year and then gets a pay raise a little smaller than inflation for the rest of his career. Back to topic. It does nothing to hire one teacher for one year if they just get downsized next year, so lets pay them for 20 years to have a real, generational effect.

      Thats 76M / 2 (half to overhead) / 50 (thousand bucks per teacher per year) / 20 years = no calculator necessary about 38 teachers for twenty years. So across a dozen states you just hired about one (big) elementary school, or perhaps an average sized middle school. Eh.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    9. Re:We should already have this. by TheLink · · Score: 5, Interesting

      http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/13/education/from-finland-an-intriguing-school-reform-model.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print

      "The fact that we have more race, ethnicity and economic heterogeneity, and we have this huge problem of poverty, should not mean we don't want qualified teachers - the strategies become even more important," Dr. Darling-Hammond said. "Thirty years ago, Finland's education system was a mess. It was quite mediocre, very inequitable. It had a lot of features our system has: very top-down testing, extensive tracking, highly variable teachers, and they managed to reboot the whole system."

      Singapore and South Korea do about as well as Finland but with a different approach - the students do a lot more work, have more pressure and I think they have a higher student to teacher ratio (more expensive directly for the State). FWIW I think I'd prefer to be a Finnish student than a Singaporean student. The former apparently enjoy the process of being educated more.

      --
    10. Re:We should already have this. by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You did the right thing though. The main problem here is that many parents cannot afford to bypass a broken educational system, which in the long run hurts everybody.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re:We should already have this. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Agh, I mean the Singapore and South Korea way is cheaper directly for the state: fewer high quality teachers required.

      --
    12. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An apple II, eh?

      When you get down off that high horse of yours, I'll be sure and remind you that you're not that old.

    13. Re:We should already have this. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is it just me, or shouldn't we already have this by hiring competent, caring, understanding educators in the first place?

      I know one of those - a special ed teacher. She truly loves her kids and and does whatever she can to help them; but she is caught in system that says she *must* teach the same curriculum as for regular ed kids. Never mind that her kids, after a week of teaching them the color red, forget what it is as soon as they learn blue; she must teach a specified curriculum. The kids do not have to learn it, she must however prove she exposed them to each part of it. So, instead of being taught skills they can use in life they sit through lessons that they'll never remember. She tries hard to make them interesting and appropriate, but it is frustrating. I would not be surprised when she qualifies for retirement she decides to quit and do something else; not because she doesn't like teaching or isn't good at it but the system seems to be designed to make it a miserable experience. Add in pay cuts despite signing a contract at the start of the year and parents who expect 24 by 7 availability (she gets emails on Christmas and New Years Day) and it's no wonder teachers leave the profession or simply give up and coast to retirement.

      We truly do not value education; and in the end get what we deserve.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    14. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize almost all private schools pay teachers far less than public schools. Teachers go to private schools either because of the environment (the school can kick out troublemakers and low performing students) or because they do not have a teaching license and thus are not eligible to work in public schools.

    15. Re:We should already have this. by Nemyst · · Score: 2

      Funny that, most class averages I've seen hover in the C- to C+ range. Then again, I'm not in the US, so perhaps our own education system is not as bad as I thought.

    16. Re:We should already have this. by JosephTX · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is the common sentiment among older generations, yet younger generations regularly score higher on tests that previous generations have taken; kids today have to learn alot more than you did, so you'll have to forgive your kid for not knowing how to use a slide-rule since he's busy learning calculus instead. If you think kids today are "lazy" or have it too easy because they aren't doing the lab exercises you're talking about, that's because they're too busy learning about the various discoveries in chemistry and biology since your days in school to waste a whole day on a pointless lab demonstration. Not ALL teenagers are the delinquents the previous generation hears about on the news. Also, most kids in my high school DIDN'T get A's; even though everyone SAID they got A's, just looking at the roster showed most ended up with B's or C's, and even so, "the masses" were in non-honors classes, where an A isn't given as much credit as an A in an Honors class. So Gym class today is pointless and an obligatory A. Don't like it? Your kid shouldn't even be in Gym class to begin with; sign him up for a computer science class instead. The only one at blame for that is you. It seems generally-accepted for your generation to criticize your children's generation (except your kids! they're angels), but guess what? your parents' generation did the same thing. And my generation will do the same thing. And who, exactly, will be the ones doing this criticizing? "The masses" who lack such basic skills like self-judgment or humility. The same not-so-intelligent type of person you complain about, and the same type of person you've shown yourself to be.

    17. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      “Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
        Albert Einstein

    18. Re:We should already have this. by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      I see you used the plural form of "parents". This was once the norm, but that was destroyed by big media (who shaped expectations and opinions), big government (who decided that welfare programs should reward irresponsible breeding), and the religious establishment (who decided that they really just want the collection plate filled).

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    19. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prison guards are well paid too

    20. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. D in gym? The only way you can get a D in gym nowadays in my public school system is to not bring your gym clothes to change into. As long as you look like you're trying to play soccer or whatever and not disrupting the class TOO much they give you an A because not everyone is good a sports therefore you get an A for effort. Except not everybody's good at chemistry, or math, or history either. If you're not good at something you shouldn't get a good grade...

    21. Re:We should already have this. by Zibodiz · · Score: 1

      I was homeschooled K-12, and when I was entering 10th grade, we went to a computer sale held by our local high school. They were selling all of the computers that had just been replaced with iMacs. The apples were all Apple II's & Lisa's. There was one Macintosh 128k that had like $250 on it (they obviously thought it was the best thing there). The PCs (there were only a few) had 286s. I'm only in my 20s.
      That having been said, one of the three reasons my parents homeschooled my sister and I is because of the idiotic grading system. At the time, we lived in Washington (State), and the local school made the papers for actually writing the test answers onto the chalkboard/whiteboard/whatever during the exams. Everyone always got A's there. In fact, when the school graduation issue released in the paper, they printed their GPA along with their name, photo, et al. The worst GPA was a 3.6, and over half the class were 4.0's.
      Btw, my dad was an editor for the local paper at the time, hence we always had the inside scoop on the goings-on. About 4 years later, we moved to Wyoming because of the high crime rate. The papers here don't publish student GPAs, so I have no point of reference for whether our schools are better or worse, but at least my dad hasn't done a writeup on teachers cheating for their students.

    22. Re:We should already have this. by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is the common sentiment among older generations, yet younger generations regularly score higher on tests that previous generations have taken

      [Citation needed]

      kids today have to learn alot more than you did

      Like that "alot" isn't a word?

      they aren't doing the lab exercises you're talking about, that's because they're too busy learning about the various discoveries in chemistry and biology since your days in school to waste a whole day on a pointless lab demonstration.

      You mean watching videos of a cartoon character doing it rather than learning how to do it themselves?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:We should already have this. by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Yes, the ass-backwardness of the modern educational system... Tracking performance through metrics... like grades. Education is not art. It's passing down to the next generation what is already known. Since there is a way to measure it, it should be measured. Measurements don't exist because they are fun or cool or turn somebody on. They exist because they are informative.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    24. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was homeschooled K-12, About 4 years later, we moved to Wyoming because of the high crime rate. The papers here don't publish student GPAs, so I have no point of reference for whether our schools are better or worse, but at least my dad hasn't done a writeup on teachers cheating for their students.

      Why would you move to a state with a higher crime rate? Another homeschool fail?

    25. Re:We should already have this. by sideslash · · Score: 1

      Why would you move to a state with a higher crime rate? Another homeschool fail?

      There are so many things wrong with your brief post, it's hard to know where to start. First, in terms of violent crime commission rate over population, Washington state is in fact worse than Wyoming, per http://www.census.gov/statab/ranks/rank21.html (maybe that's changed over the last few decades, maybe it hasn't). Second, if you had thought things through a little more deeply before posting, you would realize that even if Wyoming had a higher crime rate than Washington, GP's family could have improved their situation by moving to a town or county with a low crime rate. A state-to-state comparison is really meaningless, which observation by itself permits us to classify you as an idiot in this situation. Third, your phrase "another homeschool fail" indicates ignorance of the success rate of homeschooling in general, which tends to eat other modes of education for lunch in comparative studies.

      Full disclosure -- I was homeschooled K-12 as well, and am just getting started homeschooling my own kids. It's not for everybody, but when you do it right, it rocks.

    26. Re:We should already have this. by Proudrooster · · Score: 2

      > Is it just me, or shouldn't we already have this by hiring competent, caring, understanding educators in the first place?

      No, it's just you. The elite think that spending $5-6k per student per year is good enough for the masses. They however spend over $20k per year to educate their children at private schools with low, low student class sizes and lot of extras. The average good teacher makes it about 5-years before burnout. Anecdotally, I know a really good teacher that just left at the 5-year mark. He worked his ass off to start programs and teach kids. Unfortunately, it was no longer economically sustainable for he and his expanding family so he switched to another job at 2x the pay.

      It's not what is best for teaching and learning, it is about how large can we push class sizes and how little resources can we provide. On the other hand, if you start a war, you can get a blank check. Definitely not what is best for kids.

      Think about this. Take a city like Detroit. What if just accepted that it sucked and decided we were going to spend whatever it took to educate the kids. What if it student ratio was 3 kids to 1 teacher? How long would it take to fix the problem? 12-years? Seriously? This would be a permanent societal fix. It is just a matter of priorities and resource allocation.

    27. Re:We should already have this. by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Whew! I'll be getting off your lawn now.

    28. Re:We should already have this. by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      This is a big part of the problem. I was an English teacher and routinely had average class sizes in the low 30s. That's teaching 3 periods a day. Sometimes I had as many as 36 in a class. Imagine trying to assign, edit, return, and regrade a 3-5 page writing assignment. It was nearly impossible when you throw in all the worthless No Child Left Behind paperwork.

    29. Re:We should already have this. by swalve · · Score: 1

      Some of the most well-paid people I know are teachers.

    30. Re:We should already have this. by swalve · · Score: 1

      $5000 for a classroom of 30 students is $150,000 a year. If the teacher gets $50,000, where does the other $100,000 go? Every year?

    31. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would they go after sp ed kids? how much harm can they do?

    32. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Person who posted post #38857623 here.

      I think there's roughly 50 million k-12 students in America. Let's say we wanted to double the number of teachers (while ignoring the issue of building constaints) in order to half class size. Another way to look at this is to ask, how much would it cost to teach 25 million k-12 students? I assume it's roughly $10k per student per year. So, is the federal gov't were to pitch in a quarter trillion per year, would that be enough to cut class sizes in half?

      (Of course, I'm a proponent of cutting DoD to provide more money for k-12 and higher education. I'm also a proponent of UHC, but that's another mess entirely.)

      What you said about grading 3-5 page writing assignments, I assume it's worse than it sounds. The smart students make it easy, but I'm guessing the other students probably suck up more of your time when grading the paper. An incorrect paper takes longer to correct than a correct paper, and I base that on my experience when grading math homework as a college student. Although, I assume English papers aren't as black and white as math homework (check answer, check to make sure adequate work is shown).

    33. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my sister and me

    34. Re:We should already have this. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Well, a lot of systems force a normal distribution on everything where the average will get C on an A-F scale, but it's not without side effects. I went to a rather prestigious study, like only the top 5-10% students would be qualified to get in. For classes that we shared with other studies like math classes we'd pretty much all get As and Bs, and the trend mostly stayed in other classes too because it was silly to say this was a D or E grade project even if you were slightly worse than all the other really bright people.

      Then in our final year we had one class where they insisted to use the whole scale and distribute us and the results were ridiculous, people that had never ever in their life been below a B grade were getting D, E and even a few F - fail, even if I knew these were extremely bright people who'd know the curriculum intimately. That is not fair either when you get an E and the least worst of the bunch from Yokel University got an A and while there's some prestige to the education institution you went to it doesn't really make up for that.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    35. Re:We should already have this. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      $5000 for a classroom of 30 students is $150,000 a year. If the teacher gets $50,000, where does the other $100,000 go? Every year?

      That's per class - say seven classes per day with 4 different teachers (at more like 30k/year if they are lucky) and you have 30K left for staff/supplies/maintenance/etc. Not really that much.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    36. Re:We should already have this. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      therefore you get an A for effort.

      Well, in all fairness, how else are they supposed to grade you in gym? Is everyone who isn't naturally gifted in sports supposed to get a D or F? I always thought that work and effort were what gym was supposed to be all about. Obviously, someone who is naturally athletic isn't going to be judged on the same scale as someone who can barely handle a basketball. Otherwise you would likely be giving the same grade to someone who sat around and did nothing and someone who really busted his ass trying to get better.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    37. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a load of this guy.

    38. Re:We should already have this. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Why not the same for math then? Some people are naturally gifted at math, just as others may be gifted at basketball. Maybe none of these people are naturally gifted at all, but their parents chose to do a lot of sports with them from a very young age, so they seem naturally gifted. Maybe the kids who is good at math had his parents asking him math questions every day. There shouldn't be a concept of A for effort. Because I know a lot of people who tried really hard in school, but still couldn't grasp the material. If you can't grasp the material, then you shouldn't get a good mark.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    39. Re:We should already have this. by webheaded · · Score: 1

      This is all completely silly. Everyone that goes to school is learning about discoveries the previous generations made. We build on them, simplify what came before, etc. It all evens out. The fact that you can't understand that puzzles me.

      Also, alot is an imaginary creature. A lot is what you are looking for. If you're going to stick it to someone about education, you should probably take care to actually proof read what you are writing a little better. :)

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
    40. Re:We should already have this. by dontclapthrowmoney · · Score: 1

      Maybe "for effort" marking should apply to subjects that generally will have no marketable value? The vast majority of people will never earn a sporting related income, and the physical education marks aren't something that most employers would pay much attention to. In fact, I would suggest the gym class mark would mean more to an employer if it was for effort, not aptitude.

    41. Re:We should already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh much?

    42. Re:We should already have this. by swalve · · Score: 1

      The average US teacher salary is more like $45k. And it doesn't matter much whether the students move around to different classrooms, the student to teacher ratio remains the same.

    43. Re:We should already have this. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      What's the marketable value of English class. Once you pass the point of writing coherent sentences and basic reading comprehension, there isn't much use to a lot of it. All the parts about picking apart old stories, finding the archetypes. That kind of stuff. Pretty much as un-marketable as gym class. You could probably do away with the entire study of English (or whatever your native language is that they teach), and just incorporate the language lessons into all the other classes. Instead of spending all that time reading for readings sake, and writing book reports. Have students read texts on biology, history, geography, chemistry, math, and write reports about those subjects.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    44. Re:We should already have this. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      The average US teacher salary is more like $45k. And it doesn't matter much whether the students move around to different classrooms, the student to teacher ratio remains the same.

      Correct, but the OP assumes 1 teacher per class, when the average is 15 students per teacher - so at his $6K and your 45K that leaves 45K for everything else, not his $100K. That was my point - it's not just 1 teacher per class on average even though classes may have 30+ students.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  3. Murdoch Political Agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What really worries me is Murdoch's general push into the field of education. The man has already succeeded in indoctrinating an entire generation of adult Republicans into his own twisted version -- a version that has neither served conservatism nor America well. Is he going to start with the children now?

    1. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

      Murdoch is scum. The only thing he cares about is power. He is completely fine with hurting lots of people if that increases his power.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just the republicans that have been effected. Murdoch has been aiming to make the republicans and democrats two sides of the same coin, one using the stick and the other the carrot. The only candidate even running for president that doesn't entertain lobbyists (ie: raises his own campaign funding, isn't bought and paid for like the rest) is Ron Paul - and the bulk of the population believes him to be insane due to the crap Murdoch generates about him specifically because he can't be bought. Frankly, the country DESERVES another holocaust if Ron Paul isn't elected - and this time one with technological oversight to such a penetrating degree that NONE of the retards are missed, we don't need a WW4 afterall.

    3. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by orono2011 · · Score: 1

      owa great

    4. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. But what I really want to know, is Gates paying Murdock with trash bags? I sure hope B.A. doesn't hear about this.

    5. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by colinrichardday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and the bulk of the population believes him to be insane due to the crap Murdoch generates about him specifically because he can't be bought.

      No, the majority find Ron Paul insane for his work on a racist newsletter and his advocacy of the gold standard, neither of which has anything to do with Murdoch.

    6. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is he going to start with the children now?

      You are kidding right? Murdoch started by going after the children. Anyone remember the FOX network back in the day? All it played was cartoons and sitcom reruns targeted towards kids. Even today sunday night on FOX is all cartoons, all of which I'm sure Murdoch despises.

      I guess smoke and mirrors trick worked.

    7. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 0

      Because Murdoch is a Jew, therefore criticizing his actions is generally considred anti-semitic.

    8. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by steelframe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Murdoch is Catholic, unless you read Stormfront or Ron Paul newsletters.

    9. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      So making anti-black statements and demanding a gold standard are somehow a criticism of Murdoch?

    10. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Not only is he a Catholic, his political activism is largely in line with modern Catholic establishment.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    11. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by RazorSharp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's interesting and all, but the parent didn't say "Murdoch is the worst scum that has ever lived." He said, "Murdoch is scum." He didn't even say that Murdoch was the scummiest man in journalism.

      For what it's worth, Hearst was just as or more scummy than Duranty, and he's a more apt comparison to Murdoch. Duranty was just a Soviet shill whereas Hearst paved the way for guys like Murdoch, started a war to sell newspapers, supported Hitler . . . need I go on?

      Also, I would argue that NewsCorp's efforts to sell the war in Iraq are far more grievous than denying a famine. Even if Duranty would have reported accurately, those people still would have died. How many thousands died in Iraq because of the misinformation Murdoch spewed out to the public? If News Corp wouldn't have drummed up public support for the war it probably would never have occurred.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    12. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by sco08y · · Score: 0

      Duranty was just a Soviet shill whereas Hearst paved the way for guys like Murdoch, started a war to sell newspapers, supported Hitler . . . need I go on?

      Hearst supported Hitler? Quoth Wikipedia:

      In 1934 after checking with Jewish leaders to make sure the visit would prove of benefit to Jews, Hearst visited Berlin to interview Adolf Hitler. Hitler asked why he was so misunderstood by the American press. "Because Americans believe in democracy," Hearst answered bluntly, "and are averse to dictatorship."

      Hearst described Kristallnacht as “making the flag of National Socialism a symbol of national savagery” and advocated the creation of a "homeland for dispossessed or persecuted Jews.” When news of the Holocaust began to seep out of occupied Europe, Hearst covered it as important news, in contrast to other newspapers which downplayed the mass murders.

      It's only wikipedia, but, yes, you do need to go on before I'm going to accept that the guy supported Hitler.

      Even if Duranty would have reported accurately, those people still would have died.

      Do you really believe that? Nothing would have happened? All the diplomacy, all the protests, they're all completely useless? Governments can just do whatever they want and there's nothing anyone can do?

      Even if you're that cynical, why is it that the Soviets and Nazis, and even the Chinese today think that death camps and labor camps need to be hidden?

      Also, I would argue that NewsCorp's efforts to sell the war in Iraq are far more grievous than denying a famine.

      What "sold" that war was an insane tyrant who refused to let other nations be sure he didn't have nukes. The administration people pushing for an aggressive strategy in Iraq genuinely wanted to do the right thing in Iraq. What a political system needs, though, is a principled opposition to give them useful alternatives.

      The anti-war movement is virutally silent now that a Democrat is in office, even though much of his foreign policy is damned near Bush's foreign policy on autopilot.

      What is it that failed to sell peace? A blatantly political anti-war movement. All those idiots did was scream about how Bush was Hitler, and if there were any serious thoughts coming from the anti-war movement, they were entirely drowned out.

    13. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Relevancy? That there are other scum, possibly even worse ones, even in the same field does make Murdoch better how?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by RazorSharp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're wrong on every point. Am I surprised? No.

      Your wiki quote is cute. You left out this part:

      Hearst was a supporter of Adolf Hitler from 1934 until 1938

      Regarding Duranty: No, I don't think anything could have been done about the famine. Diplomacy would do nothing to sway the Soviets. Why would it? And how would it do anything? A famine means there's not enough food. When there's not enough food there's just not enough food. The Soviets just didn't want their dirty laundry aired. It was 1933. No one was going to help the Soviets. It would just have been bad press - "look how bad communism is!"

      Regardless, Hearst is still a much more appropriate analog to Murdoch.

      Concerning Iraq: Saddam Hussein complied with every single U.S. request leading up to the war. When he submitted an inventory of his arsenal, Bush claimed that it was inaccurate because WMDs weren't on the list. Upon invasion that inventory looked to be pretty damn accurate.

      What failed to sell peace was FUD. It was a textbook example. People were scared and uncertain and Fox News fueled that FUD as much as they could. Other media outlets failed by not standing up to all the nonsense, afraid they'd look unpatriotic, but at least they didn't actively pursue war.

      The "serious thoughts" coming from the anti-war movement were drowned out by jingoism, racism, and fear. Right after 9/11 Bill Maher said, "we've been the cowards, launching cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away, that's cowardly." Not long after he show was canceled. The Bush administration, Murdoch, and others on the far right successful used a national hysteria to stifle individual liberties, empower their oligarchy, and effectively wag the dog. The fact that Americans were willing to put up with blatant censorship post-9/11 (banning songs on the radio!) shows just how irrational the general populace was between September 2001 up to around 2005. In your case, the irrationality seems to be a permanent state.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    15. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by dixon1e · · Score: 1

      Murdoch is desperately trying to learn the lessons from his Myspace debacle. Has has publicly stated it was a disaster he does not want to repeat. Anything that gets him "closer to the kids" is a good thing from his perspective. Having Gates pay for it, in this form factor and political cover, is simply outrageous.

    16. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Ha, typical leftist Slashdot mods are trying to bury me, just like on Digg. :-)

      Hearst was a supporter of Adolf Hitler from 1934 until 1938

      You're incredibly dishonest, let's finish that quote:

      According to David Nasaw Hearst was a supporter of Adolf Hitler from 1934 until 1938: Hearst believed that Hitler was going to bring a century of peace to Europe. However, in a private interview Hearst told Hitler that in order to be a great leader, he must "stop the persecution of the German Jews." Hearst convinced himself that Hitler was going to listen to him, but his support for Hitler only changed following Kristallnacht in 1938.

      So, basically, after Hitler showed his true colors, Hearst dropped his support. Many people thought that Fascism generally was a bold new invention; the German Worker's Party that the Nazi party was formed from was quite popular.

      And, again: the left continued to support Stalin and Communism even after the tremendous slaughter of his regime had been exposed, and you're still apologists for it.

      Diplomacy would do nothing to sway the Soviets. Why would it?

      Of course not. What finally toppled the Soviets was diplomacy backed by nuclear weapons. In spite of leftist apologists for the mass murders. There's no reason to believe that the West, with proper knowledge, couldn't have influenced the Soviets to stop it.

      Not long after [Bill Maher's] show was canceled.

      And nothing of value was lost.

      Saddam Hussein complied with every single U.S. request leading up to the war.

      The Iraqis sent thousands of pages of garbage reports. They moved munitions around while inspectors were visiting.

      The fact that Americans were willing to put up with blatant censorship post-9/11 (banning songs on the radio!) shows just how irrational the general populace was between September 2001 up to around 2005.

      The nonstop protests that simply stopped as soon as a Democrat was in office is a fact you can't address. It was purely political theater, the irrationality was coming entirely from a deranged left that was upset that the Republicans had gone after Clinton.

      Hatred is not a principle to base reasoned arguments on, and that's all you had. You're still so full of hate you believe in these bizarre conspiracies where Dick Cheney and Karl Rove have Fox News and a handful of right-wing rags orchestrate the entire rest of the media in suppressing all the brilliant peaceful alternatives we could have pursued that, obviously, the Koch brothers must have deleted from the Internet.

    17. Re:Murdoch Political Agenda by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Fuck off!

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  4. This looks like a good idea? by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Am I missing something? This sounds like a good idea except for that Newscorp is involved. Besides that, what is wrong with this? Heck, I'm even wondering if anonymous, averaged data per school would be publicly available to see how schools are doing.

    It just seems like this is the sort of thing that should have a glaring hole in it.

    --
    by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    1. Re:This looks like a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we already have the anonymous, average data per school. it's a big business, too

    2. Re:This looks like a good idea? by gweihir · · Score: 2, Informative

      From experience made in the field of learning metrics, this usually produces teaching that increases test scores, but fails real the learning goals, i.e. producing insights and capabilities. This is well known. Looks like Gates failed to do any real research on the subject. Not a surprise and in line with his usual level of "insight". The only thing Gates can do well is amoral and borderline criminal business practices.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:This looks like a good idea? by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      [use of metrics] usually produces teaching that increases test scores, but fails real the learning goals, i.e. producing insights and capabilities.

      Are you saying that it fails on the measure of "how much insight and capability was produced"? What kind of measure is that, and how is it collected? Would you even call it a "metric" ?

    4. Re:This looks like a good idea? by mvar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most of us suspect what the future regarding personal privacy will be like. This tracking system, while at first it sounds like a very convenient way for teachers to easily access their students grades and know their weak and strong points, it is more of "another brick" in a structure that will gradually and - with the aid of other similar tracking systems and laws - eventually evolve in some Orwellian (big brother) system where all your personal history from your earliest years (your school grades, your sociality, your behavior, your political beliefs, your health records etc) will be in a single file for anyone (employers, insurance companies, the law etc) to access.

    5. Re:This looks like a good idea? by Nemyst · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice way of conflating your dislike of closed-source software and Microsoft in general with what Gates can do outside of said corporation.

      Why was this even modded informative to begin with? You can disagree with someone without resorting to ad hominem attacks.

    6. Re:This looks like a good idea? by failedlogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is no need to worry.

      Newscorp agents will carefully monitor student feedback ..... by hacking their voicemail accounts on their cellphones.

    7. Re:This looks like a good idea? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If any Americans were ever aware of the shit that his papers were pulling on the other side of the pond, they've forgotten it by now.

      I'd have thought Bill Gates (or whoever advises him on PR) had more sense than to get involved with such a despicable fucking rat-bastard, but apparently not.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:This looks like a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I can't figure out is why Gates is paying someone else to develop software (ignoring for the moment the practicality, morality, or efficacy of said software)... didn't he used to have a big software company? Is he admitting what everyone else already knows, which is that the last actual programmer left Microsoft at least 5 years ago and he's got nothing left but momentum and a bunch of incompetent amateurs?

    9. Re:This looks like a good idea? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that it fails on the measure of "how much insight and capability was produced"? What kind of measure is that, and how is it collected? Would you even call it a "metric" ?

      That is the whole point. There are no useful known metrics and it looks like there cannot be. In such a situation, metrics always make matters worse. Even a randomized approach usually is better (i.e. produce the data in a random fashion without input from the object to be evaluated).

      In many areas metrics just hurt and common sense is the only substitute. Of course that requires personal integrity as well and explains why Americans are so fond of metrics.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:This looks like a good idea? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It is not "ad hominem" if founded on facts. Have you looked at Microsoft software and in particular Gate's "visions" in comparison to others? He is absolutely clueless.

      As to the moderation, you are going "ad hominem" on the moderators instead of accepting their judgement.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  5. Why Fox / newcorp and not NBC / comcast? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Or is MS no longer part of MSNBC?

    1. Re:Why Fox / newcorp and not NBC / comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because gates doesn't need to care about moving money from one of his pockets to another..

    2. Re:Why Fox / newcorp and not NBC / comcast? by Attack+DAWWG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because News Corp. already has an extensive background in surveillance.

      And a long, successful background in indoctrination, for that matter.

    3. Re:Why Fox / newcorp and not NBC / comcast? by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

      MS has been out of MSNBC for quite a while. I'm on my phone or I'd link you to the MSNBC wikipedia article, but it says when they got out there.

    4. Re:Why Fox / newcorp and not NBC / comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, for one thing this isn't Fox, it's Wireless Generation, which Murdoch bought about a year ago.

      For another, you would be helping things by switching. Fox, MSNBC, Huff Post, many others, all down in the muck.

  6. Great way to collect unsullied data... by Tastecicles · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...give the job to someone well versed in wiretapping.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  7. Who will the customers be? by vlm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The obvious assumption when you're dealing with a known criminal organization is that they'll put all this effort into gathering information in order to sell it. The problem is, who will the customers be?

    So... you package up a spam list of all the students who flunked financial literacy 101 and sell it to the car dealers, Realtors(tm), and mortgage brokers, "come and get em!". But they don't need the leads, because its all cross fertilized. The customers at the rent-a-center are the customers at the payday loan store are the customers at the subprime mortgage dealer are the customers at McDonalds are the customers at Walmart. They already know who these guys are.

    OK so see I never took any automotive classes, so you assume you can screw me over at the stealership. What you don't know is I spent a summer helping a great-uncle rebuild a 1930's diesel tractor, helped weld a homemade lake-pier together which is still standing a quarter century later, etc ... The idea that a "college bound" student like myself would attend a votech class was unthinkable in that era, and probably today... in fact all of our suburban students are supposed to go to college to make the bankers who provider the loans rich, so I don't think shop class attendance is going to be relevant or useful data. In a way, this is great, because it encourages people to teach themselves, not attend a class. I certainly did not learn how to replace brake rotors and pads in a classroom, that's for sure.

    And the rest of the data? Donno. Maybe I'm low on caffeine but I donno who can profit off the knowledge that I aced everything in 2nd year chem aka introductory o-chem or that I didn't do so well in 9th grade history because I was bored to tears (well not literally, but darn close).

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Who will the customers be? by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      You collect data in order to determine the general trend. Nobody expects it to predict each and every thing you do exactly. Hence, even though you bucked the trend and learned something on your own, the data collector is still justified in making the prediction that you can only know what you were formally taught because in 99% of the cases this will be true. If you learn on your own, think for yourself, or otherwise do something you're not supposed to be doing, you're the exception and the companies who buy data to predict your behaviour don't care about you anyway because you're not the sucker they're looking for.

    2. Re:Who will the customers be? by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Considering that Google thought I was an 18-24 year old male when I am well above that age range and most definitely a female, I'm not too worried about my demographics being out there for the world to see.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    3. Re:Who will the customers be? by vlm · · Score: 1

      the data collector is still justified in making the prediction that you can only know what you were formally taught because in 99% of the cases this will be true

      I would disagree in that everything that is not compulsory is forbidden and everything that is not forbidden is compulsory and mistargeting of ads is too likely.

      In my example, all kids in my suburban school are supposed to go to college, therefore standards were pretty high, and we were almost all unable to attend shop class or at least strongly discouraged. When I signed up for a CAD intro class you'd think I grew a second head, the way my advisor/counselor reacted. Yet we wrenched on our cars in our spare time; we had to if we wanted to be able to afford wheels. Using this educational data, you'd think no one graduated by my school system in at least the past 30 years knows anything about cars, you'd be very wrong. Similar for cooking; I was forbidden to take cooking classes, have to take geology instead. That does not mean no one in my entire district for more than a generation can cook.

      That closely ties to the mistargeting problem. Auto shop and cooking class were where disciplinary problems were sent to keep the academic classes orderly until the problems either straighten out and fly right, or drop out. You're far more likely to sell brass knuckles and weed pee test passing substances to A+ automotive shop class kids than socket sets or breaker bars. I hope the people buying the sales lists understand this little problem. The percentage of students in shop class / cooking class accurately reflects soft drug addiction rates and other mental issues, nothing to do with the possible sales rates for car repair and gourmet cooking spices. For all practical purposes, the number of kids who took geology approaches 100%, but the number of people in the geological hammer market in my community approaches zero.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Who will the customers be? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Considering that Google thought I was an 18-24 year old male when I am well above that age range and most definitely a female, I'm not too worried about my demographics being out there for the world to see.

      Artificial Stupidity at work ;-)

      Really the only human mental "skill" that machines can emulate well.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Who will the customers be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot. I think we trust Google on this.

    6. Re:Who will the customers be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Who will the customers be? by r00t · · Score: 2

      Sure about that? Google might know something you don't. Google knows everything.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_androgen_insensitivity_syndrome

      As for the age, maybe your parents are hiding the truth. You could be the result of a secret pregnancy and birth, intended to cover up the fact that your older sibling went missing.

    8. Re:Who will the customers be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you don't know is I spent a summer helping a great-uncle rebuild a 1930's diesel tractor, helped weld a homemade lake-pier together which is still standing a quarter century later, etc ..

      they know now! should have used ac!

  8. Nothing Good can come out of a Murdoch Venture by dryriver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This man and his sprawling NewsCorp media empire have almost single-handedly ruined/corrupted objective journalism, and done so across multiple countries where NewsCorp is active. Nothing good can come from allowing Rupert Murdoch anywhere near schools and educational institutions. His signature reckless profiteering and lack of a conscience/values will likely corrupt the education process, too, not enhance it. I can't believe that Bill Gates is teaming up with Murdoch... I was under the impression that Bill had gone all "good guy philanthropist". Maybe I was wrong about that... But seriously, no venture owned by Rupert Murdoch should be allowed within a mile or so of a school, or of any other institution frequented by kids. This man will just try to spread his twisted, f^cked up neocon-ultra-jingo-conservative values to school children, given the chance. Don't do it, Bill. Whatever you are trying to accomplish, its not worth collaborating with this news-bully/snakeoil salesman/jingoist warmonger. Simply... don't... do it!

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    1. Re:Nothing Good can come out of a Murdoch Venture by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

      Maybe that *is* what he is trying to accomplish by throwing in with him.

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    2. Re:Nothing Good can come out of a Murdoch Venture by dead_cthulhu · · Score: 1

      I think that the good folks in Liverpool know how to deal with the Murdoch empire.

    3. Re:Nothing Good can come out of a Murdoch Venture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cnn et al are no better at objectivity than newscorp. at least when it comes to objectivity.

    4. Re:Nothing Good can come out of a Murdoch Venture by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      This man and his sprawling NewsCorp media empire have almost single-handedly ruined/corrupted objective journalism, and done so across multiple countries where NewsCorp is active.

      How can that be true? The BBC is as objective as ever.
      The idea the Murdoch has corrupted the entire media is silly

      This man will just try to spread his twisted, f^cked up neocon-ultra-jingo-conservative values to school children, given the chance.

      You apparently missed the part where it states this is about software to track student performance, not curriculum or instructional materials?
      But I can understand your concern - no schools should permit any deviation from "progressive" messages and practices, or "progressive" programs like racist curriculum .

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  9. and yet education level goes downhill by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    All the amazing tools and yet education level goes downhill. Why is that? Because the most important tool of education is metaphorical belt, ominously hanging on the metaphorical wall: if you are slackin', you' get the smackin'.

    And the presence of father. Not the father "figure", but the real father (who does the metaphorical smacking).

    If you have this, you don't need tools, just keep giving the homework and tests.

    Give parents full autonomy of their kids. Sure few families will horrendously abuse their kids, but millions of families will get an opportunity to make a better next generation: less antisocial, more productive.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:and yet education level goes downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I feel the state should jail parents who spank children, but I also think that children should be held accountable for their actions. Autonomy of parents is not what we need, parents are the problem. We had that generation. They grew up and gave us this nightmare.

      End spanking of children forever, but still punish them if they do wrong. Spanking children is child abuse. Good parenting is not. I've seen kids who were beaten their whole lives turn into sociopath nightmares of adults. It doesn't help, it makes things worse.

    2. Re:and yet education level goes downhill by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Violence stunts emotional growth and significantly increases the odds of latent psychopaths turning into active ones. This is a real problem and latent psychopaths are not that rare.

      There are other forms of punishments, that together with rewards do work well. Of course they require a bit of insight into human nature. Seems that there are still primitives among us that do not have this insight.

      I am fully aboard with jailing parents that use violence against their children. Nothing good comes from it and violence begets more violence.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:and yet education level goes downhill by shiftless · · Score: 1

      I am fully aboard with jailing parents that use violence against their children. Nothing good comes from it and violence begets more violence.

      So you're fully "on board" with putting people in cages at gunpoint, in the name of "stopping violence"?

      Is that kinda like a "preventative war"?

      Or "thoughtcrime prevention"?

  10. This is dangerous by gweihir · · Score: 5, Informative

    Learning is an individual process. Strong focus on "metrics" hinders progress and produces educated morons that can score high on tests but cannot do anything else well and do not have any real understanding on how things work. One reason is that the metrics typically used strongly promote learning facts without understanding them. The only place such people can perform well is on bureaucracies, i.e. in jobs where their main task is to decrease the performance of others. This technology allows even better implementation of that fallacy.

    The only way to improve education is by improving the teachers. And, yes, that means firing bad and mediocre teachers and hiring good ones. Of course they will be more expensive and will need significant freedom to teach as they see fit, i.e. no parent influence. (A single moron parent can ruin a whole course if they are given influence....) Nothing of that sort seems likely to happen in a country so backwards that evolution is actually a disputed subject.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:This is dangerous by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The problem, to the extent that schools can fix it, is with teachers. Fix or fire the bad ones, improve and hire better ones. But somebody has to make an assessment of how effective the teachers are and there need to be tools for that.

      Excessive focus on individual students, ironically, detracts from the ability of states, districts and administrations to run schools that do the best possible job for students.

    2. Re:This is dangerous by r00t · · Score: 1

      And how do you identify bad teachers? Testing! Without testing, bad teachers hide in a cloud of bullshit.

      Testing also serves as a less-biased way to grade the students. Teachers give better grades to attractive students, but the tests are blind to such things. Standard tests solve the grade inflation problem.

      Why blame testing when the metrics promote facts without understanding? Teachers make that error too. Test designers don't always make that error. Either way, it's just a matter of quality.

    3. Re:This is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One reason is that the metrics typically used strongly promote learning facts without understanding them. The only place such people can perform well is on bureaucracies, i.e. in jobs where their main task is to decrease the performance of others.

      Rather extraordinary claims like these require a little more proof to support the argument.
       
      I imagine those who work as bureaucrats would take quite a different argument on the positives they add to society.

    4. Re:This is dangerous by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Fail. Only good teachers can reliably identify good teachers. Testing just produces the same bad results, but with a longer impact time. I do understand that with the fundamentally broken legal system in the US, nobody is willing to go by opinions anymore for fear of being sued, but it really is the only way. Come to think of it, maybe this whole thing is just one more symptom of the decline of the US.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:This is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree testing is important, but believe me, as a professor, I've seen the consequences of focusing on testing too much.

      You end up with conscientious, agreeable students who are good are regurgitating facts but not much else, who are terrified of what happens when you don't tell them what to do, or when the theoretical rules they've learned don't work in real life.

      You need metrics, but the question is "which ones?"

      In my mind, test scores are one part of the equation. For example, I'd be fine with a teacher whose kids' standardized science test scores are a bit lower, but who can point to higher than average levels of participation and achievement in science fair competitions.

      I think the key is for the teacher and school to be able to make a case for why they're teaching well. If they're getting away with bullshit, that's not the bad teachers' fault, it's the fault of whoever is letting them get away with bullshit.

      Whenever your evaluation of teaching is ruled by one or two metrics, whatever that is, it causes problems. In higher ed the problematic metric is teaching evaluations. Yes, teaching evaluations are correlated with independent evaluations of learning, but that correlation is relatively low and moderated by lots of factors. It *should* be one thing that can be considered. However, when it's the only thing being considered, you end up with grade inflation and uneducated, naive students' expectations driving curricula.

      The same thing happens at other levels of education. Metrics are good, but whenever you decide one or two metrics are the gold standard, everything goes to hell, because every metric has its own problem. Is the SAT important? Sure, but I'd never want to admit students solely on their SAT--that's why we have GPAs, why we ask students to write admissions essays, why some schools want to meet the students, look at how they're spending their time.

      I used to think tenure at lower levels of education was a bad idea...now I'm not so sure. Spoiled parents who expect their children to be coddled, or who demand their own fucked up idea of science (e.g., "intelligent design") cause all sorts of problems, and good teachers *should* be immune to that bullshit. That's not to say that there aren't problems with bad teachers who are impossible to dislodge, just that I think that people are looking at the wrong solutions. We should be trying harder to attract good teachers, making their lives easier, rather than instituting faulty measures to correct the lowest common denominator among bad teachers.

      I think the primary problem, what it boils down to, is what are *you* doing with your kids? What are your neighbors doing with their kids?

      The last thing we need is a criminal like Murdoch, who thrives off of sensationalism for a profit rather than finding solutions, getting involved in higher education.

    6. Re:This is dangerous by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Have a look into the literature. I recommend "The Peter Principle" as a starting point. As to bureaucracy, yes, most bureaucrats suffer from a hugely inflated sense of self-value. Understandable, given that what they do is fundamentally evil. That they are a blight of society has been known very, very long. Just one citation: "The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state" (Tacitus)

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:This is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only good teachers can reliably identify good teachers.

      That sounds like something a self-identified good teacher would say.

      When you have a bunch of teachers, all of whom say that they're all good teachers - but testing shows that the students of half of them don't know how to read and write - what do you do?

    8. Re:This is dangerous by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Standard tests solve the grade inflation problem

      This is completely untrue. In fact, it worsens the problem. Standardized testing leads to teaching for the test. Teachers whose students do well on standardized tests focus superficially on the material that will be tested and gloss over the ancillary knowledge. Meanwhile teachers who focus on making sure the students really understand the subject matter will have kids who test less well. Plus standardized testing is re-evaluated year after year, and changed according to areas where the student body at large over- or under-performs. So grades inflate in the sense that students do better on the test year over year, while understanding less and less. It's the same effect as traditional grade inflation (all kids must pass mentality), only with a different driver.

      There's an apparent solution that is a hard pill to swallow for many in the US, and that comes by looking at Finland. Finland's school successes are being attributed to the fact that there are no private schools in Finland. There are some independent schools, but they may not charge tuition, and are publicly funded as well. This is true right into secondary and post-secondary education. They also have no standardized testing with the exception of a single graduation exam. They promote individualized grading. Progress is tracked with a random sampling of students.

      The one that is probably the biggest contributor though, and the one least frequently talked about is the publicization of their schools. It means that every wealthy and powerful individual sends their kids into the same system that every dirt farmer's kids go into. Most US politicians send their kids to private schools that most US citizens wouldn't be able to afford (and it's pretty likely that a large chunk of those kids get a free ride because of who their parents are). Public education doesn't matter to policy makers in the US, because policy makers don't use public education.

    9. Re:This is dangerous by r00t · · Score: 1

      Standardized testing leads to teaching for the test.

      Good. The test covers everything, right? If not, fix the test. Note: it doesn't literally need to cover everything, but a random (unknown to teachers) subset is required. In no case should a teacher ever know in advance that desirable subject matter will be untested.

      Teachers whose students do well on standardized tests focus superficially on the material that will be tested and gloss over the ancillary knowledge.

      If we care about such "ancillary knowledge" then it goes on the test. If not... well WE DON'T CARE. Anything and everything we care about has a chance to be on the test.

      no standardized testing with the exception of a single graduation exam

      Kind of a huge exception, eh? Most parts of the USA don't even do that.

      every wealthy and powerful individual sends their kids into the same system

      No, not unless kids are randomly assigned to schools across the entire country. Better neighborhoods will have better schools. This makes those neighborhoods even more desirable and thus even more expensive. As housing costs go up, the useless people become unable to live there and unable to send their ill-behaved kids to the schools.

      Finland does well, just like Korea and Japan, because Finland has a homogeneous non-idiotic culture. The USA has a very non-homogenous culture. The difference between two randomly chosen Finnish kids is tiny compared to the difference between two randomly chosen American kids.

    10. Re:This is dangerous by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      You know that it's not possible to use a standardized test to determine understanding, right? You can test process and memorization, but you can't test knowledge, only someone who works with individual students can assess that.

      then it goes on the test. If not... well WE DON'T CARE

      And that's how America is constantly coming up at the tail end of the first world when it comes to the education standard for its students. Some belief that a magical automatically graded test will be able to do a better job than critical analysis by educational professionals.

      Kind of a huge exception, eh? Most parts of the USA don't even do that.

      No, every part of the USA does, both public and private education. It may not be mandatory for the graduation of the student, but it's done anyway, and it affects funding for the school district. And in Finland, the test is mandatory for graduation, but not the sole marker. You could get 100% on the test, and be rejected for graduation because you are not considered to understand the material and passed instead by rote memorization.

      Better neighborhoods will have better schools

      Just like in America, where the same thing is true, except the politicians still send their kids to private school. All schools get the same funding in Finland, regardless of the earning potential of that district. Under-performing schools are given more money and access to the most highly trained professionals. Contrasted to the US where an under-performing district loses funding.

      The difference between two randomly chosen Finnish kids is tiny compared to the difference between two randomly chosen American kids.

      You think genetic heritage has more to do with educational success than a system where the entire country is dedicated to its success?

    11. Re:This is dangerous by r00t · · Score: 1

      You know that it's not possible to use a standardized test to determine understanding, right? You can test process and memorization, but you can't test knowledge, only someone who works with individual students can assess that.

      A couple decades ago, I got a perfect score on the AP Chemistry test. I simply can't imagine how one would be able to do that with memorization. Most of the test might best be described as word problems from Hell.

      And that's how America is constantly coming up at the tail end of the first world when it comes to the education standard for its students. Some belief that a magical automatically graded test will be able to do a better job than critical analysis by educational professionals.

      Those "educational professionals" have shown themselves to be biased, corrupt, and incompetent. Attractive students have enough advantages without also having unfairly better grades.

      All schools get the same funding in Finland, regardless of the earning potential of that district.

      I had assumed so. They don't get the same quality of incoming students though, and this difference will tend to increase with time as families outbid each other for increasingly expensive houses near the good schools. The effect is less dramatic due to the more homogenous population in Finland. Obviously USA-style funding serves as a magnifier.

      Under-performing schools are given more money and access to the most highly trained professionals. Contrasted to the US where an under-performing district loses funding.

      Either way is pretty bad. Finnish teachers surely realize that they get paid more if they do a bad job!

      You think genetic heritage has more to do with educational success than a system where the entire country is dedicated to its success?

      I wouldn't be surprised, but I specifically wrote "culture" because culture is clearly a tremendous source of failure. The failure is both direct (example: a culture with "crab mentality") and indirect (lack of empathy due to differences, with resulting troubles).

  11. Rupert Murdoch? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wait, wait...isn't this the same guy who had another company that got into really deep hot water by hacking into people's phones and otherwise massively abusing their privacy? As in shut-the-company-down, pay-out-millions-to-the-victims, and some-just-got-arrested bad?

    There IS a place for technology in schools, absolutely, and if you're at all familiar with schools the level of useless redundant work that goes on drives you nuts. Every year it ticks me off that I have to fill out 50 pages of nonsense information to tell the school what they already know. That said, you know who you don't give the job of modernizing it to? Someone with a track record of abusing the hell out of people's privacy.

    1. Re:Rupert Murdoch? by locketine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      or a penchant for misleading the public into believing falsehoods that promote his own personal desires. Even if they manage to collect accurate data I could definitely see Rupert manipulating the data or how it's interpreted to tell the public his own narrative of what needs to be changed in education.

      --
      Think globally but act within local variable scope.
    2. Re:Rupert Murdoch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that Steve Jobs you are thinking of?

  12. Re:The Ballad of Barack Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Racism....very sad...

  13. well, somebody should by superwiz · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Teachers are so opposed to performance metrics that it's impossible to tell if a B in Colorado is better or worse than an C+ Vermont.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  14. In what parallel Universe by koan · · Score: 1

    Does Bill Gates pay immoral propagandist Rupert Murdoch to produce software?

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:In what parallel Universe by Noitatsidem · · Score: 1

      I know, I know! This one, this one! Crap, that's not good...

      --
      Feel free to mod me down, just know that unlike some Anonymous Cowards I'm not afraid to express my views as myself.
  15. Re:The Ballad of Barack Obama by gweihir · · Score: 1

    The hallmark of a weak mind.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  16. There is an effort to collapse public education. by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is an effort to collapse or split education into haves and have-nots in the US. Its been really going on since Integration in the US. For decades before Integration, there were policies of "Dual Schools" in the US. That's happening again, and it's going to take legislators to stop it. The only way I can see it happening is massive over haul of the Public education system and forced closure of private education systems. There is a concerted effort by the conservative power elite in the USA to splinter and collapse universal schooling. The only way is to outlaw non-state sanctioned schooling so the wealthy are forced to participate in the public schooling system.

  17. Re:The Ballad of Barack Obama by blackpeoplemeet · · Score: 0

    Is you is, or is you ain't, a black people?

  18. Gates + Open Software = Anathema by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    n/t

    1. Re:Gates + Open Software = Anathema by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      I had a coffee-out-the-nose moment when I saw "Rupert Murdoch" and "open software" in the same sentence. Murdoch doesn't believe anything positive comes from "open" anything. Perhaps, use of the service will be "open" to anyone with enough financial lubrication.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
  19. Re:There is an effort to collapse public education by vlm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You'd need to do something about districts and remove local budgeting and control of schools. Not saying I agree with you, but if you don't do that, then all you're doing is shuffling names around without actually changing anything. If you keep districts at "neighborhood" or "city" size, then you just end up replicating have/have-not based on real estate value. Which leads inevitably to lower property taxes and higher state or federal taxes, more bookkeeping, middlemen, and corruption, etc. Because taxes never reduce, that means the locals will have lots of extra money floating around, which leads to more corruption. So overall, you'd theoretically get standardized education, but probably at a lower level due to higher corruption, and the upper half would still have everything from simply caring about their kids school all the way up to private schools, so as a society I don't think we'd win because the rich would remain better off, but the median would drop. The absolute bottom of the barrel would do better, but they're just going into the prison industrial complex anyway, so I see little point in wasting educational resources on them, just what we need, smarter criminals. So in summary, I disagree with your method and your goals, each for different reasons.

    There is a concerted effort by the conservative power elite in the USA to splinter and collapse universal schooling

    No its a 1% vs 99% thing, and the 1% use anti-leftie PR when talking to the righties, and anti-rightie PR when talking to the lefties, to get both sides to do their bidding. Looks like you fell for it hook line and sinker.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  20. Murdoch's secret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call student's voicemail provider

    Enter 1234, 1111, or any of the other top dozen garage door codes.

    Extract messages

    ...

    Profit!

  21. It will morph into Conformity Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Marks will not be awarded for raw intelligence in math, chem and the hard sciences. It will turn into a sheeple score. How well you fit in as a corporate cog. Shut up, don't rock the boat, kiss the whip that beats you. How compliant you are. How much abuse and corruption you can endure, without blowing the whistle. How well can you turn your head away from the deaths at Foxconn. How well can you spin death, corruption, pollution in the media.

    All you shit disturbers here on slashdot would have been marked and seperated out long before you every reached the second grade.

    Jobs and Wozniak would never be hired by the Modern Apple HR department.

    The kids that instintively say Hell No to the brutal psyops that marks industrial schooling, the Einstiens, the gentle geniuses, the shy creative types, everyone who was marked, scarred and terrorize by the years of indoctrination called education.

    Public school is an awful place. To do well in it, 'WELL' being defined by Murdoch and Gates, that to me is some kind of new and awfull hell. Evil of a brand new kind. Evil worthy of a new word.

    To everyone out there still in school, you have my deepest sympathy and greatest support. I cannot even imagine how awful and soul destroying it is now.

    1. Re:It will morph into Conformity Monitoring by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      Your post is 100% true, not hyperbole. When I was 13 years old my friends and I redesigned the logo of our public junior high school into a hammer and sickle to protest the strict dress code. Later in high school, I was in the rock band. Since nobody bothered to vet our lyrics, we played The Anti-Nowhere League's So What uncensored during a lunchtime concert at school.

      Now, go to any college. At an intersection, the light will be red, but there will be no traffic in sight. They will all just stand there like sheep, even though they could walk across the intersection without any risk, just because the light is red.

    2. Re:It will morph into Conformity Monitoring by LuxuryYacht · · Score: 1

      Public school has already been that way for decades. There is no monitoring of how the teachers arrive at a students grade. It's heavily dependent on how much they like the student or how well the student conforms to their ideas of what should be rewarded. They don't even return graded work any longer since it might be used by next years class to "cheat".

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur
    3. Re:It will morph into Conformity Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because the light is red

      I stand at them because it is the law. I do not not j-walk because 'i can get away with it'. That is my choice. Yet you do not respect it and call me sheep for doing it.

      To disregard the law is just going to produce douchebags. In the late 70s New York city was a hell hole. A place where you did not go out at night. A place where even going to the park could get you a knife in the gut. Then they did something magical. They enforced the 'petty' laws, they got the officers out of their cars. Now New York is much more safe. The idea is if you ignore the small laws the big ones do not seem such a big of deal to break.

      It is why with most minor laws you get a 'warning'. Basically just a 'heads up we are watching you so do not do stupid things'. Even though 99.999% of the time they are not watching.

      You call them sheep. I call them law abiding citizens. Is that such a bad thing? I can respect someone who breaks the law to show the law is dumb. But you sound more like 'i break the law because I can' sort of fellow. You then want others to join you so you do not feel like an ass doing it. Or as my father used to tell me 'act like an ass get treated like one'.

      Or let me ask you this. Where is the cut off for 'dumb' laws? When does it start to become 'serious' and 'should not do that'? Which ones are you free to ignore and which ones must you keep up with? You will find that list a very grey one.

      Let me demonstrate...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8

    4. Re:It will morph into Conformity Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, rounding up a large percentage of the population for and putting them in prison will vastly improve the traffic situation.

    5. Re:It will morph into Conformity Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were a "rebel" as a teenage? Wow, that's amazing; I was one too! What are the odds of that!

    6. Re:It will morph into Conformity Monitoring by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Actually tests are pretty much uniform measures of knowledge gained. Of course it will significantly bias grades to those who are good at tests. I was one of those study the night before after bludging through the whole term to pass to get a higher grade start studying two nights before the exam. Write down answers for example questions and done. Essay and projects are just so annoying, especially when their original intent was as a learning tool rather than a grading tool. I gather from Gates funding preferences he was also good at exams and lousy at group projects.

      Why not give students a choice projects or exams and see who has to repeat at the end of the year.

      As for trusting any News Corp company with children's privacy, WTF?

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re:It will morph into Conformity Monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nice non-sequitur, but the reason people hesitate at red lights even when no cars are around is if you do a lot of walking, you want to *subconsciously* handle as much of the walking as possible. If I start teaching myself that traffic rules are optional, I might treat them as optional *even when I'm not paying attention*.

    8. Re:It will morph into Conformity Monitoring by swalve · · Score: 1

      Group projects are worthless unless the subject being taught is group projects. The only people who like them are the ones who sponge off the work of the rest of the group.

    9. Re:It will morph into Conformity Monitoring by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      To be fair the other people who like them, are the ones that stress out at exams and fail due to mind block (fear of failure leads to failure) and of course the communicators, those that like to have meetings, do presentations and often do more than their fair share of work.

      There are a few slack and idlers but they are of course the narcissists and psychopaths, these genetically deficient individuals have to go to school as well, otherwise how would school bullies graduate to be law enforcement (versus police officers, those the police the peace), investment bankers (enough said) and Republican politicians (and good mix of Democrats in there as well), basically if there is a profit to be made by exploiting others they'll be there.

      So will they include a psychological developmental assessment over time so that perhaps by high school of the more destructive individuals can be weeded out to specialist institutions. I'm sure Ballmer would have appreciated that and personally I would have preferred avoid that particular unnecessary aggravation, as they tended to group together.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  22. HALLELUJAH!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's right! Kill everyone who doesn't vote for Ron Paul! Brilliant.

    1. Re:HALLELUJAH!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if he's right, we'll kill ourselves, no help needed if we don't get rid of the corruption.

  23. I work in education indirectly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The "problems" in education, IMO, are multifaceted. Slapping performance metrics on top of the way things are now is only going to demoralize everyone further.

    I find that teachers generally want to do well by their students. One problem is that some teachers have low or outdated content knowledge and,m accordingly, low or misplaced confidence. What is being done to "moderize" teachers? Or does that come after identifying which teachers are "bad" according to student performance on standardized tests?

    Techniques to improve teaching/learning is a moving target. Teachers are desperate for that magic pill by which every student will finally understand. Like New Math. Like using computers. Like using educational games. Frankly, students will be different. Each method will probably speak to a different set of students. The "panacea" may be in maximizing the number of techniques that can be used for reaching the most students. However, we would have to ask whether the standardized student tests are set up to be able to capture the learning gained.

    Also, teachers are not solely responsible for students' private lives. Maybe a student stressing over his parents' shit or being bullied. Some parents need to be involved in their kids' education and not stand by and "let" the school do the work. Learning takes some effort, so some students need to get the nonsense out of their heads enough to focus at least part of the time.

    School districts need to stop being accountants for the sake of their own careers.

    In US culture, everyone says they want a good educational system, yet it seems that things like money, sports, etc., receive a disproportionate amount of attention. And the role that religious nuttery and willful ignorance play serve to distract people from critical thinking skills.

    I'm sure there are other points I'm missing.

  24. How is this any different than what Google does? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android heavily tracks people with the built-in Google spyware.

    Chrome's reroutes all traffic through Google's servers and the EULA gives Google a nonexclusive right to display and distribute every bit of content transmitted through the browser.

    But lets not just hit Google .... what about telcos? They track everything users do in their networks.

    So how is this any different?

  25. Cue the Violent Femmes . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    "I hope you know that this will go down on your permanent record"

    Oh yeah? Well, don't get so distressed

    Did I happen to mention that I'm impressed?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  26. Socio-economic Metric by killfixx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This will end up becoming a metric of parental/economic efficacy.

    I'm a teacher. My students have diverse socio-economic backgrounds. The students from "better" situations, on average, perform better. The reverse is usually true also. Of course, there are always outliers, but we're talking averages.

    If this information was to be used to correct those out-of-school factors, that would be great. Unfortunately, they will most likely be used to punish under-performing teachers and districts.

    --
    "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
    1. Re:Socio-economic Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they will most likely be used to punish under-performing teachers and districts

      Excellent.

  27. Re:There is an effort to collapse public education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Agreed. There is no such thing as concerted effort by the "power elite". There are just lots of little groups with a lot of money each, each trying to independently do what is best for them. Because of this, they start acting in similar ways which looks appears in concert, but is really not.

    It is a bit sad too. If there was a central power, at least there would be a way of fixing things simply. Instead its like trying to fix Medusa.

  28. you prefer psychological abuse by r00t · · Score: 1

    Psychologically abusive parents produce some pretty fucked up children.

    Physical punishment is simple. It happens, and you move on. There isn't continuing manipulative nastyness.

    Physical punishment methods can be taught to nearly anybody. The critical idea is that the age of the child determines how long of a badness-to-punishment delay is allowable; a baby will fail to associate misbehavior with punishment if a tiny fraction of a second has passed. Also, avoid head impact.

    There, now you know the two important rules. You can stop the psychological abuse.

    1. Re:you prefer psychological abuse by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Abuse is abuse. It can be psychological. Non-violent punishment can well be non-abusive. However physical violence is always abuse, just have a look into the literature. There is not even a discussion about it anymore, the verdict from science is crystal clear. "Violence begets violence" is an accurate description of human nature.

      One of the problems is it that it is so bad that people that were affected themselves often glorify it in retrospect (to suppress the humiliation among other things) and then do it on their own children. Stupid, but all too human.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:you prefer psychological abuse by shiftless · · Score: 1

      One of the problems is it that it is so bad that people that were affected themselves often glorify it in retrospect (to suppress the humiliation among other things) and then do it on their own children. Stupid, but all too human.

      No, that is stupid nonsense. There is absolutely nothing wrong with swatting a kid on the behind if he/she refuses to behave. There is nothing that pisses me off more than seeing somebody's stupid ass kid running around and being obnoxious in public with the parent refusing to do anything about it, while everyone else has to suffer. Like for instance this girl I saw in the grocery store the other day who was acting bratty. Her mom told her she couldn't have a treat she asked about because she "had a complete meltdown earlier." Later at the checkout counter the girl was whiny and obnoxious all the way out the door. Yeah, that "withholding treats/affection/whatever" method of "child rearing" really seems to accomplish a lot huh?

      You know, it's not even that I totally disagree with the "non violent" child rearing methods espoused by some people. Of course popping the kid on the butt should be used in moderation and as a last resort. No, it's the smug sense of superiority, saying child spanking etc should be "totally banned", etc. To anyone who says that: fuck you. Pass whatever stupid mother fucking laws you want to pass. There's already so damn many of them dictating how I want to live my life, that the Federal Government has even lost count of how many are on the books. Everybody is a criminal now and I guess I'm no exception. Come to my house and tell me I can't raise and discipline my child in the way I see fit? You'll be greeted with a shotgun to the face asking you politely but firmly to leave. Yeah that's right, this must be some of those "violent" "antisocial" thought patterns that have been "bred" into me by my "violent upbringing." Or maybe it's just my belief in the Constitution combined with my genetic disposition towards doing what I think is proper rather than what some ignorant asshole thinks is proper based on his own stupidity.

      Some people are just too fucking naive and ignorant to stop for one second and look past their own lives, to understand than every single child is different and the same methods of upbringing that work fine on one child totally do not work on another. The same methods that work in one part of the kid's life might even not work as the child ages and develops. To say in a blanket statement that one type of child rearing that has been known to work for eons should be "totally banned" is something that only a person who totally disgusts me, the personification of everything that is wrong with this country, a person who is in favor of tyranny and dictatorship rather than freedom, would say. I say everyone live your lives how you see fit, and stay the fuck out of mine.

    3. Re:you prefer psychological abuse by Thyrsus · · Score: 1

      "There is absolutely nothing wrong with swatting a kid on the behind if he/she refuses to behave." That statement has been falsified by the epidemiologic evidence (it obviously being unethical to have an un-spanked control group and a spanked test group). Children subject to physical discipline are more likely to be charged with crimes once they mature. Unfortunately, I can't find an un-paywalled citation.

  29. Fair and Balanced ® by xs650 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it will be Fair and Balanced and not lead to more teaching to the test.

  30. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do we trust Bill Gates' judgment on anything related to public education? This is a man who grew up the son of a wealthy politician; he has no firsthand experience with what happens in public school. He is also a college dropout. An admittedly smart, successful man, but his life experience is so far removed from those of us who grew up as public school "consumers" that, frankly, I find him to be among the LEAST qualified people to be making judgment calls regarding public education. Add Rupert Murdoch's unabashed doctrine of extremist right-wing nonsense (which includes anti-intellectualism and teacher-bashing) and we end up with an even bigger problem on our hands.

  31. New education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real education here is to get the kids used to being tracked in detail by the corporations, um, for marketing purposes.

  32. Right... by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Who are we going to believe? A 20 year old boy or Google?

    The Google has judged, welcome to the male gender. It is much like the dark side without the cookies.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Right... by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      It's my own fault for hanging around Slashdot, computer part stores, and video game websites all the time. Apparently things like Bath & Body Works and Lane Bryant don't cancel it out.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:Right... by vlm · · Score: 1

      It's my own fault for hanging around Slashdot, computer part stores, and video game websites all the time. Apparently things like Bath & Body Works and Lane Bryant don't cancel it out.

      As if a (formerly) "18-24 year old male" like myself didn't shop constantly at BBW and LB (and other "girly" places) for girlfriend gifts. I probably blew more money at BBW than compusa back in the day, a rather substantial sum of money. Think about it, what is a teenage boys greatest motivator, and which store on average is more likely to get him some, autozone or BBW? Well thats enough GOOG apologetics for now, but I had to literally LOL at your claim that being a big BBW customer somehow proves the existence of a XX chromosome. If anything a big spender there probably proves the reverse in a majority situation (let me guess than 75% of their sales profits are to men buying gifts not directly to women, yes the store is full of women window shopping who don't buy anything or get like one tiny little bottle, but the big spenders are mostly guys buying gifts)

      To totally ruin your illusions about shopping, you know that guy at the scrapbooking store with the heart melting request to help him pick out scrapbooking supplies for his sick mother who is stuck at home with a cold, to help her feel better? Yeah I can't say I invented that line, but it sure works. Eventually the cashiers figure it out and tell the shoppers and it all turns into a big joke, but its fun for awhile. The eternally alone on friday night guys shop at Radio Shack and wonder why they can't find any wimmin, but some of us shopped at scrapbook and craft stores and fabric stores and we went out every friday night, with some pretty cool and interesting women.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  33. What is your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A: Hitler was a horrible person

    Sco08y: Have you ever heard of Stalin?

    A: He was horrible too. What does that have to do with Hitler?

  34. Gates and Murdoch, eh? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

    If only there was a way to pull Steve Jobs into this story - there'd be a Perfect Storm of hate for Slashdotters...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  35. Diamond Age? by DreadPirateShawn · · Score: 1

    On one hand, I understand (and largely agree with) the various concerns about algorithm-izing students, grade inflation, and using the money directly to fund teachers. Our public education system has a shit-ton of critical P1 bugs.

    However. On the other hand, I'm reminded to Neal Stephenson's "Diamond Age" interactive primer. First, the manifestation from the book is clearly not the initial beta version; some lengthy amount of revision and improvement would clearly be necessary to achieve the level of sophistication presented in the storyline. As such, Gates' initial investment along these lines could be a key first step down this path. Second, the manifestation from the book demonstrates a clear power over educational thought that is conveyed by the approach -- that is, if creating an algorithm for more effective education WAS attainable, then it would be an algorithm which could single-handedly influence entire generations* down a path of compliance with, or rejection of, status quo systems.

    * This technology would also likely be available only to the elites with money to fund it, at least initially. Perhaps GNU GPL versions would surface over time. Given the power over educational philosophy, would the developers have to be thoroughly licensed in the educational system first? With versions of the software that are considered with the same distaste as allowing middle-schoolers to read Hunter S Thompson?

  36. Concerns About Undue Influence by Billionaires by theodp · · Score: 1

    Gates is also funding funding other billionaires' aligned initiatives and bankrolling astrotufing-likened school advocacy, raising concerns about undue influence and even a call for eliminating the charitable giving tax deduction. 'This year, governments may lose $50 billion because of tax deductions taken overwhelmingly by the rich for charitable givings intended primarily to enhance their status with their brethren or to attack the public sector,' writes David Morris. 'We can't stop the rich from using their money for their own purposes. But we should not add insult to injury by giving them huge amounts of public sums to attack the public sector.'

  37. Re:The Ballad of Barack Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hallmarks of weak minds also include those who only listen to facts that support their ideology.. the religious right and the socialist left come to mind. if there are any cognitive differences between 'races', they'll never come to light which is too bad. it would allow us to tailor education efforts accordingly.

  38. Presumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like Billie G. has as fettish for .."Teens"!

    Oh Oh Oh ... just "In-Line" with the Fettish's of Stevie B.!

    Oh how homey!

    Billie and Stevie butt coupling again after all these years. Land sackes. Wonder of Wonders. Perhaps their MSFT stock will ... Up and Up and Up and Up. .... Oh Oh Oh.....

    Well.

    I'm really not one for these faggots.

    So I hope that they get their well deserved hart attack ... least ... I do not have to visit them! And that is a good thingy!

  39. They are opposed to bad use of performance metrics by pavon · · Score: 1

    There have been standardized tests in elementary through high schools for at least 30 years. Back then they were treated as they should be: a useful data point in determining how well students/teachers were performing, but not the end-all-be-all of the education system.

    In the last 15 years, the number of standardized tests for kids, paperwork and mandatory training for teachers has increased so much that students are spending almost an additional month of the year away from the classroom because of it. Classes are now being taught for test, rather than making any attempt to put the information in context. All because some stupid MBA-types don't know how to effectively administrate, and want their job boiled down to looking at a few numbers.

    Trying to judge a teacher solely on metrics is as stupid as trying to judge a programmer on lines-of-code per day, or bug-fixes per week, or average time to close support tickets. If make everything of value (teacher's salary, student's opportunities) dependent on the formulaic application of metrics then all they will tell you is how good people are at gaming the metrics. The result is a worse education system, just like over-reliance on metrics in business is a great way to have a division that looks good on paper just before it blows up in your face.

  40. Re:They are opposed to bad use of performance metr by superwiz · · Score: 1

    There have been standardized tests in elementary through high schools for at least 30 years.

    Ok, and now we have the means to have more fine-grained information.

    Trying to judge a teacher solely on metrics is as stupid as trying to judge a programmer on lines-of-code per day

    Depends on the metrics. Just like you CAN judge a programmer on some metrics. There are good metrics for judging teachers' performance. And, no, teacher's salary is not a good metric. It says nothing about how well they perform their job.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  41. The problem is one of the overuse of metrics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Metrics used to measure students, teachers, schools, and districts are the problem. Metrics are way overrated and you'd think computer programmers would understand this better than most people except lawyers. Complex metrics create more errors and loopholes/bugs as well as being difficult to understand and evaluate. Simple metrics are easily hacked and worked around; not that complex ones are that great-- because even a complex one is a simple set of rules up against a motivated human brain. Its like pitting a calculator against a chess master.

    Gates has no clue. After years of working on the topic he still hasn't learned much. He is foolishly stuck to metrics as if sales numbers for windows somehow equated with quality... too many years of warped thinking probably limits him from fully grasping the issues involved.

    I'm sure every parent will love to have their brat labeled by a couple bad teachers and that record to follow their brat to every teacher and school the rest of their lives... Like that Seinfeld episode about the problem of avoiding bad doctors notes in your medical record.

    Most the issues with kids is psychological; they can handle old methods from 50 years ago.... they have more non-school problems to deal with and parents who are both working among all sorts of other problems. Put in psychologists instead of computers and you'll see more results (computers have yet to show proven results, not that we can trust most the metrics used to prove any point.) I would have been just fine with no computers in school; they offered no benefit, I had one at home and couldn't have done anything constructive on the ones provided anyhow.

  42. What exactly is open-license technology? by microphage · · Score: 1

    “In addition to making instructional data more manageable and useful, this open-license technology, provisionally called the Shared Learning Infrastructure (SLI), will also support a large market for vendors of learning materials and application developers to deliver content and tools that meet the Common Core State Standards and are interoperable with each other and the most popular student information systems” link

  43. Not what WE deserve by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

    "We truly do not value education; and in the end get what we deserve."

    Our children are not getting the education they need because we do not put enough emphasis on them getting it.

  44. Re:There is an effort to collapse public education by shiftless · · Score: 1

    Absolutely not. The solution to this problem is NOT dictatorship! Dictatorship of our education system IS the problem! I don't know exactly what the solution is, but I do know that one day I want to open my own school. A private, but affordable academy where middle class kids can get a quality education. Enjoy your outlawed private education because I will long have since emigrated to a free country to start my enterprise there, rather than in your tyrannical utopia hellhole of forced public indoctrinat..er, "education." Uruguay is looking better and better.

  45. Excuse me... Jew is a RACE by Dainsanefh · · Score: 1

    Fraud and world domination through deception is built in to their DNA. They just look like normal white people except of the big hook noise and dying-fish eyes.

    If you take a black african and convert him to Judaism, he is still black, not a jew. Same goes with Asians.

    http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-entertainment-news-monopoly-murdoch-jew-part1.html

    These people will try to convert to other religion just to evade detection, but their devoutness to the Talmud is rooted deep in their mind.

    http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html

    --
    Twitter: @dainsanefh
    1. Re:Excuse me... Jew is a RACE by superwiz · · Score: 1

      I just want to make sure you understand something. The fact that people don't argue with you is not an indication that they don't have a valid argument. Nor is it an indication that they agree with you. People don't argue with you because you disgust them.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    2. Re:Excuse me... Jew is a RACE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason why people feel disgusted because they have been indoctrinated by the restriction of information flow. The more you know about the truth, the less emotional you become.

  46. good teachers -- turtles all the way down? by r00t · · Score: 1

    You have a recursion problem.

    OK, so I want to reliably identify a good teacher. To do this, I must first find a good teacher. Well then I'd better get a good teacher, but to do that I'll need a good teacher, which I will find by asking a good teacher...

  47. evidence fail by r00t · · Score: 1

    The socially conformant kids could be controlled without physical discipline, and so the parents didn't have to use it. These kids, being socially conformant, naturally have little desire to commit crimes.

    It's tautological: if you aren't naughty, you aren't naughty.

    Bad kids turn into bad adults. News at 11.

  48. watch the pea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will sort out the naughty kids for homeland security to send TSA to harass parents. It's all aboput pinging everyone for every spare sheckle ( sp). Middle class is being ground out!
      good luck to you all

    Murdoch aka green aka greenburg. Aint it weird that a news man should change his name three times?.. at least he is consistant at " massaging" the facts.