Slashdot Mirror


NASA Finds Interstellar Matter From Beyond Our Solar System

An anonymous reader writes "For the very first time, a NASA spacecraft has detected matter from outside our solar system — material that came from elsewhere in the galaxy. This so-called interstellar material was spotted by NASA's Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX), a spacecraft that is studying the edge of the solar system from its orbit about 200,000 miles (322,000 kilometers) above Earth. 'This alien interstellar material is really the stuff that stars and planets and people are made of — it's really important to be measuring it,' said David McComas, IBEX principal investigator."

75 comments

  1. Looks like a job for Captain Obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interstellar matter found between stars!

    1. Re:Looks like a job for Captain Obvious... by jimmetry · · Score: 2

      Detected, not postulated.

    2. Re:Looks like a job for Captain Obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Captain Redundant.

  2. Same atoms by Lord+Lode · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What makes this material different from that of our solar system? It's got the same kind of atoms. And why do they say *that* material is what we're made from? As far as I'm aware, we're made from the material of *our* solar system, not that of another.

    1. Re:Same atoms by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think the idea is that most of the atoms we're made up of originate from before our solar system was formed. During the creation of our solar system, the matter was compressed, condensed, ignited or otherwise changed from how it existed as an interstellar gas and so doesn't exist in the same way anymore. It's not so much that we're interested in the individual atoms as we are in the collection of the interstellar material.

    2. Re:Same atoms by Hentes · · Score: 1

      There are heavy elements that the Sun doesn't contain.

    3. Re:Same atoms by DaPhil · · Score: 5, Informative

      It seems the point is that "matter outside our solar system [...] seems to be deficient in oxygen compared to neon." (from TFA). The newly found matter seems to be distributed differently: 74 oxygen atoms for every 20 neon atoms compared to 111 oxygen atoms for every 20 neon atoms within the solar system. I still don't understand the "material what we're mad from" part...

    4. Re:Same atoms by janimal · · Score: 1

      That's the question that came to my mind (and one the other replies do not address). How do you know you are dealing with interstellar dust? It's not the oxygen to neon density, that's just a clue. It might mean you're flying though a differently concentrated part of the solar system. TFA does not seem to say this. I'm inferring that it might be because the probe is able to catch dust coming from a specific direction.

    5. Re:Same atoms by dkf · · Score: 5, Informative

      You know you're dealing with something from outside the solar system because within the solar system, the solar wind (hot, fast-moving plasma) blows all diffuse material out very rapidly. If there's a large amount of material out at the edge of where we believe the boundary to be between the domain dominated by solar wind and the domain dominated by the rest of the galaxy, and that material has a composition not seen within the solar system, we can have as a very strong guess that its extra-solar. Anything else really is much less probable.

      Which isn't to say that it is of the same composition as the gas+dust cloud that formed the solar system. That's long gone and the solar system has moved a lot since then.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    6. Re:Same atoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe the "interesting" part is measuring the composition of the material, that is, the ratio between the different elements and if there are any interesting molecules there, like 'organic' chemicals. Of course, it doesn't mean all other interstellar stuff has the same composition, it's just interesting to compare this specimen to other solar-system based chunks.

    7. Re:Same atoms by gmrath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How does this spacecraft find "interstellar matter from beyond our solar system" at a distance of 200,000 miles above the Earth while the Voyagers have found what at how many billions of miles from the sun? Differences in instrumentation? Wouldn't one expect any remaining interstellar matter to be cleared by the solar wind long ago given the range of 200 kMiles? Just asking.

    8. Re:Same atoms by JATMON · · Score: 5, Informative

      I still don't understand the "material what we're mad from" part...

      It has been a while since I took astronomy so I am sure that I will get some corrections, but I will give it a shot.

      Right after the big bang, the universe was mostly made of of just hydorgen and helinm. Most of the rest of the elements are produced by stars. During its life and depending on how big the star is, the fusion process in the star can produce elements up to iron (I think). When the larger stars (I think it is about 10 times the size of our sun and greater) die, they go supernova. This explosive process produces the heavier elements and also dstributes them back out into the universe and in time they become the stars and planets in other solar systems like ours. So we are made from the remnents of dead stars.

      Let the corrections begin :)

    9. Re:Same atoms by JATMON · · Score: 1

      And yes, I already know that I can not spell.. hydorgen=hydrogen and helinm=helium

    10. Re:Same atoms by mbone · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are heavy elements that the Sun doesn't contain.

      Not really, except for the short-lived heavy radionuclides. Even Uranium has been seen in solar spectra.

    11. Re:Same atoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure the spacecraft is 200k above the Earth. Reading comprehension is a power I possess.

      And yes, differences in instrumentation in regards to Voyager.

    12. Re:Same atoms by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Shouldn't you be able to find that material in abundance in the comets that go whizzing by as well as the great Oort cloud? Don't get me wrong, i'm really digging the "Small hard science missions" that NASA is focusing on I'm just trying to understand what makes THIS particular matter all that different from the stuff trapped all around us that didn't get sucked into any planetary formation.

      But if any NASA guys are here just let me say a big thumbs up, don't let the clueless try to drag you back into shooting meatbags into LEO, frankly you are giving us more hard science about how the universe works in a single one of these probes than in all the LEO missions the shuttle ever did. So keep sending the probes and if congress tries to screw you be sure to send a heads up to all the geek sites, we'll back you up. This is good work you are doing, and all the data your many probes are sending back will expand our knowledge of the solar system for decades. i know you guys don't hear this enough anymore since probes aren't sexy, but thanks for all the hard work and hard science you are giving us.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:Same atoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There are other remnents of typos dstributed evenly in your note.

    14. Re:Same atoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they can tell, because with such a high proportion of neon atoms, it glows. Kinda like early 90's spandex.

    15. Re:Same atoms by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Relax, the interstellar matter has been identified as Mitt Romney. Nothing to see here.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    16. Re:Same atoms by jamvger · · Score: 4, Informative

      The entire solar system condensed from the same rotating, swirling cloud. So the ratios of the elements are pretty consistent throughout. There do exist some differentiating processes, e.g. heavy atoms sink to the interior of planets, but the starting ratios for all parts of the cloud were the same.

      The incoming stream seen by IBEX has a O/Ne ratio falling significantly outside of the range expected for gasses of solar system origin.

    17. Re:Same atoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes this material different from that of our solar system?

      Didn't you watch SG-1? Everyone knows that Naquadah is available in other systems, but not ours.

    18. Re:Same atoms by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      They're from the Big Bang.

    19. Re:Same atoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. That's why the delusional Space Mining Nutters have yet to justify any of their fantasies. There's nothing out there that we don't have here in ridiculously easier to obtain form.

      (And now, observe the backlash from completely psychotic religious Space Nutters.)

    20. Re:Same atoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right after the big bang, the universe was mostly...

      Is the Big Bang still believed to be a plausible theory?

      Just sayin'...

    21. Re:Same atoms by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      Actually, no. Getting to some of those 'ridiculously easier to obtain' resources isn't as easy as you think.

      The Earth's crust is mostly iron. You'd think then iron was easy to come by. It's all bound up in different chemical compounds that are hard to work with, expensive to refine, and polluting as all hell to deal with. Regions like the Mesabi Range in Minnesota have iron that's almost pure, relatively easier to work with. The problem is, places like the Mesabi Range are fairly rare.

      Meteoric evidence suggests asteroidal iron to be even purer, and a lot easier to work with.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    22. Re:Same atoms by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      What makes this material different from that of our solar system? It's got the same kind of atoms. And why do they say *that* material is what we're made from? As far as I'm aware, we're made from the material of *our* solar system, not that of another.

      I want to know how it gained access to our celestial spheres and if it will do damage to the quintessence....

    23. Re:Same atoms by geekoid · · Score: 2

      It was a Carl Sagan reference.

      Watch cosmos.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:Same atoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't understand the "material what we're mad from" part...

      Me neither, as the stuff I get mad from is from no celestial body other than Earth ...

    25. Re:Same atoms by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The Earth's crust is mostly iron.

      I always thought that "SiAl" stood for "silicon and aluminium"...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    26. Re:Same atoms by SpongeBob+Hitler · · Score: 0

      And why do they say *that* material is what we're made from? As far as I'm aware, we're made from the material of *our* solar system, not that of another.

      Yeah, we certainly don't want any o' them thar furrin' atoms 'round here!

      --
      Wollt ihr den totalen Krieg?
    27. Re:Same atoms by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

      Yes. It's not wrong enough to be replaced by something else yet.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
  3. Its alien ... by XrayJunkie · · Score: 1

    ... so shoot it down.

    1. Re:Its alien ... by WillerZ · · Score: 4, Funny

      No need to shoot it. I have a Mac: I'll upload a virus to take care of it.

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    2. Re:Its alien ... by tanujt · · Score: 1

      No need to shoot it. I have a Mac: I'll upload a virus to take care of it.

      I'll help you by making a GUI in VB to track it down quickly.

    3. Re:Its alien ... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because you can't write an emulator on a MAC?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Its alien ... by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      Can you do this, while running from a velociraptor while toting an interracial child. Hah, I think not.

  4. SJHillman ( above ) makes an interesting point... by vikingpower · · Score: 2

    ...besides there being the possibility of molecules, in that stuff, we do not ( yet ) know. This stuff may, indeed, be more important than cynics deign to think.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  5. Oh boy! Star Stuff! by stevegee58 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Carl Sagan would be so happy!

    1. Re:Oh boy! Star Stuff! by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      As has been pointed out elsewhere, we're all star stuff. (Cue really cool B5 Year 2 ref here). I've found it entertaining to explain this to interested people, especially when I follow it up by asking, "So, how does it feel to be nuclear waste?"

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    2. Re:Oh boy! Star Stuff! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Do you know who Carl Sagan is? Seriously, pulling out a B5 reference after someone has referenced the source is really weak sauce.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  6. As opposed to interstellar matter from our system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So THAT is what interstellar means... is there an echo in the title?

  7. interstellar rocks!!! by ticktickboom · · Score: 1

    better than moon rocks! are these also completely worthless, but we will spend billions, even trillions to get one?

    1. Re:interstellar rocks!!! by eternaldoctorwho · · Score: 0

      I think I heard somewhere that we will spend "billions and billions"....

  8. Grammar police: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have a license for wielding that pleonasm?

  9. I detect matter outside the Solar Sys all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just look up on a clear night. See all those stars? Every single one of them is outside the solar system!

  10. Re:I detect matter outside the Solar Sys all the t by Saintwolf · · Score: 0

    You just blew my freakin' mind dude!

  11. Re:I detect matter outside the Solar Sys all the t by piripiri · · Score: 2

    How could it be interstellar? You know, "inter" as in "between"...

  12. Not "first time", misleading linked article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is not the first time matter from outside the solar system is sampled. Here's what NASA said in the press release:

    "...Previous spacecraft have already provided some information about the way the galactic wind interacts with the heliosheath. Ulysses, for one, observed incoming helium as it traveled past Jupiter and measured it traveling at 59,000 miles per hour. IBEX's new information, however, shows the galactic wind traveling not only at a slower speed -- around 52,000 miles per hour -- but from a different direction, most likely offset by some four degrees from previous measurements. Such a difference may not initially seem significant, but it amounts to a full 20% difference in how much pressure the galactic wind exerts on the heliosphere."

    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/ibex/news/interstellar-difference.html

  13. Press Release Mania by mbone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where to start. First, go out at night - all those little dots in the sky ? They're called stars, and are all outside our solar system. (This has been known, depending on your point of view, for at least 400 years, and probably for 2 or more millennia.)

    Second, it is pretty common for meteorites contain little inclusions of interstellar matter - organic matter, silica, and even (really tiny) diamonds. And, while we are at it, a certain fraction of the micro-meteors observed with radar (to get their orbits) turn out to be interstellar as well. (The fraction of interstellar micro-meteors suggests that there may be a few kg-sized interstellar meteorites waiting to be picked up out of the thousands in the Antarctic meteorite fields, which would be something.)

    So, this is nice research, but it is only the first in its area, and it was silly of them to say "for the very first time."

  14. Re:I detect matter outside the Solar Sys all the t by Moraelin · · Score: 2

    How could it be interstellar? You know, "inter" as in "between"...

    Yes, it's between the Sun and some stars even farther back :p

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  15. Nonsense by Moraelin · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just look up on a clear night. See all those stars? Every single one of them is outside the solar system!

    Nonsense. Genesis 1 clearly states

    6. And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

    7. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

    8. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

    [...]

    14. And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

    15. And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

    16. And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

    17. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

    So clearly the sky is a dome dividing the waters below from the water above, and the sun and the stars are set on/in it. All this talk of space and great distances and things outside our system is just you science-y servants of Satan trying to test our faith ;)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Nonsense by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I wish your joke was nearly as bonkers as some poeple are seriously trying to do.

      Did you know there is a group trying to get geocentrism taught in schools?

      Seriously, they even have a ridiculousn model, and of course a rewrite of known physics, to support their belief.

      If people don't like science, they shouldn't be allowed to participate in the discussion.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Redundant by necro81 · · Score: 2

    NASA Finds Interstellar Matter From Beyond Our Solar System

    If it is from beyond our solar system, it is, by definition, interstellar.

    1. Re:Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. Stellar material can be local to other stars or part of other stars and are therefore not interstellar. Things beyond our solar system are extrastellar. Some are interstellar, some are not.

    2. Re:Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nevertheless: all interstellar matter is from beyond our solar system.
      So: yeah, pleonasm.

    3. Re:Redundant by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      NASA Finds Interstellar Matter From Beyond Our Solar System

      If it is from beyond our solar system, it is, by definition, interstellar.

      Alpha Centauri (the star) is from beyond our solar system. It is NOT "interstellar".

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:Redundant by idontgno · · Score: 1

      "Interstellar matter found WITHIN our Solar System" would be unexpected. "Interstellar matter found outside our Solar System" is redundant, for plain (non-jargon, non-specialist) meanings of the phrase "interstellar matter".

      "Ocean water found outside Hawaii" is unsurprising and redundant. "Ocean water found inside Hawaii" would be somewhat surprising (discounting wave action). "If it's beyond Hawaii, it is, by definition, ocean" is overgeneralized.

      GPP overgeneralized and missed the point a bit, but the naive redundancy is still there. Where would you, by definition, expect interstellar matter? In extra-solar-system space.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    5. Re:Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just revolutionized the concept of the pedantic douche. Congratulations?

    6. Re:Redundant by Fned · · Score: 2

      Nevertheless: all interstellar matter is from beyond our solar system.

      Except, fairly soon, for the Voyager spacecraft.

  17. Cosmic Rays by crunchygranola · · Score: 2

    High energy cosmic rays originate outside of the solar system, which has been known for many decades. Some of them are even intergalactic - having energies so high that the galactic magnetic field of the Milky Way cannot trap them.

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  18. stuff by kimvette · · Score: 1

    "the stuff that stars and planets and people are made of"

    I think we have a word for it: "matter."

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:stuff by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      "the stuff that stars and planets and people are made of"

      I think we have a word for it: "matter."

      Sh!!! They're dumbing it down for the Neocons.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  19. Um... Where? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    You mean, outside our solar system? Funnily enough, I think that's where I'd start looking if I were looking for interstellar matter! If they found it, say, under the sofa in the astronaut's lounge, that would be another thing entirely!

    Isn't it all really interstellar matter though? For the same reason that the population of the Universe is 0! If you divide the amount of matter in our solar system by the amount of matter NOT in our solar system, the number is close enough to be zero that it may as well actually be zero! That's also my reasoning for why everything must be an illusion since we all live on average for 0 years! Hah!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Um... Where? by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      nice Adams ref.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  20. I'm sure by slapout · · Score: 1

    Cause we know for sure what Interstellar Matter looks like, right?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  21. Re:Important by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    And that was spoken like a man that fully believes that if you can feel good about it there is nothing wrong with just taking other peoples shit.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  22. Re:Important by geekoid · · Score: 3

    You want a living wage and health insurance? then support science. All the tech jobs, every electron you command, ever ounce of fuel you consume, exists because of science.

    So it's really important to do all kinds of science.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  23. Re:Important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Including life extension?

  24. TBH it's not those who worry me the most by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    TBH it's not those who worry me the most.

    Sure, some people are stupid, and prefer to take an iron age fairy tale book for illiterate backwater tribes (even under the Romans, literacy in Palestine is estimated at 3%, and most of those in the cities) for 100% accurate, against all proof to the contrary. But at least they''re consistent about it, in their stupidity. They only have one premise they have to hang onto, to make that seem to make sense.

    The ones I understand even less are those who are at least vaguely aware that some stuff isn't exactly true -- or needs some extensive editing and playing mad-libs with putting your own words into their sentence structure, under the guise of "what it REALLY meant" -- but still insist that the REST of it must be literally true and come from an omniscient source. Even though that source fucks up all over the place.

    It seems to me like if some guy came at work to give one rules under the claimed authority of being the CEO's bestest buddy and knowing everything about him and the company, one would be at least a little skeptical. If the guy then gets the founding year (and even century) of the company wrong, and the position in the city wrong (or for that matter doesn't know there's a city around it at all), and generally gets a dozen things awfully wrong even in one sitting, then everyone would think "what a poser" and be at least vaguely aware that everything else he says might be wrong too.

    But here we have a bunch of guys who had hallucinations... err... "visions" (no, really, Paul for example even says so, plus it's more than once in the OT that that's how God talks to prophets) and get a lot of stuff awfully wrong. Yet even people aware that it gets the timescale of creation wrong, and talks about events that blatantly didn't happen and nobody else heard about (e.g., Matthew's zombie invasion or the physically impossible 3 hour eclipse on a full moon), and stuff where you have to take some illiterate goat-herder's word that the proven and tested laws of physics got raped six ways to sunday over the guys who have evidence (e.g., the flood, the braking the Earth so the Sun stands still in the sky, etc), and the supposedly omniscient God doesn't know the basic biology of those he created (e.g., Jesus ranting that you don't have to wash your hands and dishes before eating, because everything that goes into your mouth is destroyed anyway, or his thinking that by worrying about your body and what you eat you can't add even an hour to your life)... still go basically "that was... err... metaphor. But the rest of it? It's all literally true."

    Jesus Christ, how can one know that a text told lies in dozens of places and still take it on faith that, no, see, everything else is literally true? They say that the definition of insanity is trying the same thing ten times and expecting different results. Well here we have dozens of places where people tried to find unerring truth in a text, and it turned out to be a falsehood. How insane does one need to be to keep trying?

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:TBH it's not those who worry me the most by hazah · · Score: 1

      The problem with your assesment, my friend... Is that you use logic.

  25. Requested correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stellar fusion produces elements up to lead, if I am not mistaken.