Slashdot Mirror


3,500 Year Old Florida Tree Dies of Natural Causes

hondo77 writes with an excerpt from The Daily "'Mother Nature claimed one of her oldest living specimens (Monday) in a freak fire that destroyed a 3,500-year-old bald cypress tree towering over central Florida. Known as "The Senator," or simply "The Big Tree," the hollowed-out majestic timber, standing at 118 feet tall, ignited before dawn. Firefighters watched helplessly as the oldest tree east of the Mississippi — and the fifth oldest in the world — blazed and then collapsed in a heap of flaming embers.' The fire likely started by 'either a weeks- old lightning strike that smoldered until combustion occured, or friction caused by buffeting winds that ignited a spark and erupted in flames.'"

206 comments

  1. If only trees could talk by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This one would have had a TON of boring stories about animals walking by.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:If only trees could talk by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Well, I've found that there are no boring stories, only boring writers. How well did that old tree write, anyway?

    2. Re:If only trees could talk by fredrated · · Score: 1

      Wow, you sure get a lot of first posts. Are you retired?

    3. Re:If only trees could talk by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      My theory is that it's a very small shell script. We should use it to replace one of the legacy "editor" scripts, it's not even remotely credible that they're really humans.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:If only trees could talk by hvm2hvm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Depends on how you process the wood to turn into paper.

      --
      ics
    5. Re:If only trees could talk by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

      Stories appear on the firehose before making it to the first page. You can actually post to the slashdot article before it goes live on the first page, using that method.

      For example, here's an example of someone making a first post before the article goes live:
      http://slashdot.org/journal/277269/couple-links-that-dont-appear-to-work-any-more

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    6. Re:If only trees could talk by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

      Oops, wish I could take back that comment.

      The "article" that I linked above is actually a journal. I forgot that they show up in the firehose also.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    7. Re:If only trees could talk by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      but think of all the exciting revelations in news stories it could have told, featuring that bears shit in the woods

    8. Re:If only trees could talk by davewoods · · Score: 1

      We forgive you. I do all kinds of things I regret (Murder, extortion, general thievery, etc) but yeah your thing is totally not a big deal.

    9. Re:If only trees could talk by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      I think it would also disagree with the article title... A tree burning down is as much "dying of natural causes" as someone "dying from an allergic reaction" to lead, after being shot 6 times in the head.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    10. Re:If only trees could talk by mister_playboy · · Score: 2

      The asterisk by his name means he is a /. subscriber.

      He can see stories and prepare a post before the story goes live for everyone else.

      It's the non-subscribers who gets lots of first posts you need to watch out for.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    11. Re:If only trees could talk by operagost · · Score: 1

      Didn't read the article, huh?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:If only trees could talk by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      In this case, since the investigation found the fire was caused either by lightning strike or some strange circumstance (not arson) - it would be more like dying from an allergic reaction to bee stings. Still relatively natural.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    13. Re:If only trees could talk by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Kids: Tell us about the Revolutionary War!

      Tree: The what?

      Kids: You know, what were George Washington and Abraham Lincoln like in person? That sort of stuff!

      Tree: Yeah, I pretty much just stand here in the woods. I can tell you about that time an eagle made a nest in one of my branches, though.

      Kids: But what of the Civil War?

      Tree: I don't think you're getting it...

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:If only trees could talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the headline for a person dying to bee stings would be "Person killed by bees" not "person dies of natural causes".

    15. Re:If only trees could talk by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      But if trees could talk, I sure the stories would have traveled around like folklore. Then we could have taught them to write with their sap onto paper they made themselves.

    16. Re:If only trees could talk by styrotech · · Score: 1

      Yeah if I was killed by a lightning strike (or a natural disaster of some kind) I don't think I'd describe it as natural causes.

    17. Re:If only trees could talk by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      If you are referring to a lightning strike - that is not a natural cause. If you got struck by lightning, would that be death of natural causes? Didn't think before replying, huh?

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    18. Re:If only trees could talk by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      Semantics. Acts of God only count if God can be convicted. While I still think "natural accident" would be a better description, an naturally caused fire IS a perfectly natural cause.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    19. Re:If only trees could talk by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      I'd classify it as accidental, not natural.

  2. Snakes alive! by Zharr · · Score: 1

    Damn those pythons!

  3. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ok, I’m not normally one of the guy’s who says this... but

    The hell is this doing on Slashdot?

    It’s not tech related, it’s not significantly world changing to fall into the “stuff that matters” side of things, and it’s not even related to a topic that frequently interests this demographic (anyone here know off-hand where the other 4 older trees are?).

    Regardless, this is a (sorta) discussion site, not a news aggregator. What is there to discuss here? Potential open source solutions to prevent this kind of thing from happening? Did the tree infringe anyone’s copyright? Can this be used as more evidence that Google is turning evil?

    Lets discuss the bus strike that just started here in Halifax, Nova Scotia (Canada) instead! Huge pain in the ass traffic backed up, people scrambling to get to work, lots of people who are just plain screwed. Also, bus drivers make way more than I thought they did! I mean it’s a shitty job and all, but I figured it was a crappy paying shitty job.

    Which side are you on? I kind of suspect HRM only wanted to change the rostering thing.. and threw the contracting stuff in there as something they could then take out and make the union look petty. On the other hand, the union is coming across as somewhat unreasonable. Opinions?

    1. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did find the story interesting (and my google reader feed lumps all my BB and /. posts together) but you're right; this story would be more appropriate for BB or an aggregator. No sarcasm; I legit agree with you.

    2. Re:Sigh by sideslash · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, there's a good answer for that: One of the really fulfilling and profounding affirming activities for nerds to engage in on a tech / "news for nerds" site is to complain about articles that don't fit that profile. But the problem is that if there never were any irrelevant articles, nobody would have anything to complain about, and thus we would have a compromised experience. It's paradoxical, but everything seems to be going according to plan.

    3. Re:Sigh by sideslash · · Score: 1

      Er, "profounding" --> "profoundly"

    4. Re:Sigh by penguinchris · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (anyone here know off-hand where the other 4 older trees are?)

      This is Slashdot, so I don't expect anyone here to know this, but TFA helpfully provides information about the other oldest trees :)

    5. Re:Sigh by Mitchell314 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I figured this is science/biology related, and - I know, it seems impossible - but there is nerd stuff out there that isn't just IT stuff.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    6. Re:Sigh by Anrego · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow.

      I read the article, and totally missed that. Kind of an interesting example of conditioning. As soon as I saw the blue email link after the conclusive paragraph, my brain basically said "ok, article is over" and stopped reading. My brain probably assumed the rest of the text was the usual "other thigns you may be interested in" cruft you tend to find.

    7. Re:Sigh by Archimagus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I agree it maybe doesn't belong on Slashdot, I actually live about 5 minutes from the park where this tree was and would take my kids there to see this tree. Pretty magnificent. So, I at least find it cool to see it on /. even if it doesn't "really" belong here. Also, disappointed to see it go. I don't know if my kids were old enough to really remember seeing it from the last time we went there. I had been meaning to get back there, but, you know, who expect a 3500 year old tree to be suddenly gone. Also, they now suspect arson and not natural causes as originally thought.

    8. Re:Sigh by WyerByter · · Score: 1

      I think the real question is what is it doing on Slashdot again. I seem to remember this story coming up when it was first published almost a month ago.

      --

      This signiture copied from somewhere.
    9. Re:Sigh by Splodgey · · Score: 1

      Apparently the tree has been involved with Tweets for thousands of years.......

      --
      Sigs are for losers....oh wait...damnit
    10. Re:Sigh by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Informative

      "(anyone here know off-hand where the other 4 older trees are?)"

      Methuselah, believed to be about 4,800 years old. It's a species of pine tree somewhere in California. The exact location is kept a secret. This is believed to be the oldest tree still alive.
      Most of the other oldest trees still living are giant sequoia scattered around California. I think Canada, Australia and Chile also have a few trees that were centuries old when Greek democracy was new.

    11. Re:Sigh by Anrego · · Score: 3, Interesting

      (tree) NERD!!!

      Sorry, couldn't resist!

      Also, someone just pointed out to me that they article actually lists the other 4 trees.. cleverly disguised as "further reading" cruft after the authors email. The thing about the one in California being kept secret is kinda neat though (and not mentioned in the article)! Canada isn't mentioned, but I've seen some _huge_ trees in BC .. wouldn't surprise me if one of them was comparable.

    12. Re:Sigh by Smivs · · Score: 2

      Why shouldn't it be on /. ? This is a 'nerdy' item, and a rather sad one as well. Rather this than the endless, tedious and (to me and many others) redundant posts relating to US politics.

    13. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The hell is this doing on Slashdot?"

      There's one less tree to hug.

    14. Re:Sigh by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

      Ditto

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    15. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Really? An organism that's 3500 years old doesn't spark your curiosity about the natural world? How come we don't live as long? You're more intrigued by the 75 millionth language that does the same thing as before? Really? Maybe you'd be interested in the 10th story this week about an asteroid? Or maybe another delusional fantasy about colonizing the Moon? That more your speed?

    16. Re:Sigh by somersault · · Score: 2

      You need to leave something to profounding fulfil the Grammar Nazis, dude.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    17. Re:Sigh by mark-t · · Score: 2

      You live 5 minutes from the park and you don't know if your kids were old enough to remember seeing it from the last time you went there?

      How is this even possible? Did they, like, never go outside or something?

    18. Re:Sigh by smitty777 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is an interesting article on the oldest trees in the world in this article. It also has a good picture of The Senator before the fire.

      --
      "Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish"
      Albert Einstein
    19. Re:Sigh by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The hell is this doing on Slashdot? Selling advertising, just like all the other articles.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    20. Re:Sigh by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      While there have certainly been a couple "WTF is this doing on Slashdot" stories over the past couple weeks, I would say this falls in well with nerd news. If a 3,500 year old tree had been discovered an article would rightfully make it's way here. 3,500 year old tree burns down deserves the same. It is scientifically interesting. I also find it ironic that your post is really just flamebait.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    21. Re:Sigh by Anrego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I saw lots of amazing perspective shifting stuff while getting dragged around on vacation by my parents as a kid .. and I don't remember most of it. At a certain age, stuff like this means nothing to most people.

      Kinda like how stuff that put me to sleep in school has turned into a serious interest many years later. Sounds really stupid, but it was actually a jaw dropping realization that I could actually go to a museum on my own accord.. no bus or permission slips or anything required..

      I think that's what was meant.

    22. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There was an article in Mental Floss providing the information: http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/115470

    23. Re:Sigh by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok, I'm not normally one of the guy's who says this... but

      Guy's what? Guy's sockpuppet? And which guy?

      Slashdot isn't a tech site, it's a nerd site. The environmental and bioligical sciences are as interesting to us nerds as astronomy, physics, chemistry, any of the other sciences, OR technology.

      What is there to discuss here?

      If you hadn't tried so hard to make first post you would have been able to see for yourself.

    24. Re:Sigh by jc42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Methuselah, believed to be about 4,800 years old. It's a species of pine tree somewhere in California. The exact location is kept a secret. This is believed to be the oldest tree still alive.

      Methuselah is a bristlecone pine. And there's a pretty good reason for the secrecy. The article mentions the fear of vandalism. But in the case of the bristlecones, something worse happened. In 1964, there was another one nicknamed Prometheus that was believed to be the oldest tree. The US Forest Service sent a guy in with a chainsaw to cut it down so they could verify its age. It turned out to be over 4900 years old. No older bristlecones have been found. Other forestry people were sufficiently outraged by this that it turned into a standard textbook-level warning, and people who study the oldest bristlecones refuse to report their locations, to protect them from the Forest Service as well as from common vandals.

      Actually, there are a number of plants that aren't trees that are known to be older, but their living parts are all young. The textbook example is the creosote bush, which sends up offshoots around its edges, and then the central parts die off. This produces "creosote rings" that spread out across the landscape. A few have been found whose oldest remnants are dated to over 11,000 years. But the living parts are only a few centuries old.

      The question "What's the oldest living thing?" turns out to be trickier to answer than you might expect. There are more than one way to define a "living thing", and there are several ways to measure age.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    25. Re:Sigh by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Mentioned near the bottom of the article's page is a group of 8000 year old trees discovered in Sweden in 2008. This makes them well older than the religious nutcase claim that the universe is about 6000 years old. Thus the article is well within Slashdot's flamebait threshhold, and belongs here.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    26. Re:Sigh by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      I remember going on a school field trip to see this tree. There was a lot of grumbling and horsing around by most of the other kids, but the tree fascinated me.

      Also, it gave me the chance to piss off one of my extremely religious teachers when I said "Wow, that thing is so old, it was around when they created the Jesus mythos!"

    27. Re:Sigh by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Yeah... but this tree only burned down a couple of weeks ago.

    28. Re:Sigh by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Its "news for nerds" transportation strikes happen all the time, unless there is something really unusual about yours in Halifax, its not news for nerds and outside of Halifax were people might be effected its not even news.

      A tree catching fire would not be news either except this one is among the oldest in the world! That makes it pretty unusual and therefore news worthy. So it meets the news part of the criteria. Lets see how it does on the nerd part!

      Well nerds/geeks are curious about the world around them sometimes to a fault. There are lots of uninteresting trees but this one is really really old, so anyone interested in botany would be fascinated, I am sure. Oh and there is both fire and possibly lightning evolved so there is something for your physics and chemistry folks. Seems like lots of room for nerd interest to me.

      My recommendation is navigate away from Slashdot and check out Google news, they can probably link you to some articles about that that Bus strike in Halifax which might be more your speed.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    29. Re:Sigh by jomama717 · · Score: 2

      I have never understood these complaints. If a story generates a lot of comments and discussion, then whether or not you or some other people feel that it "belongs" on slashdot is irrelevant - it has been found interesting by enough people in the slashdot community to warrant further discussion. Stories about some really niche piece of technology that you would probably say are the heart and soul of slashdot are the ones that generate ~30 comments and quickly fade into oblivion. Interestingly you can usually spot these stories because they have a lot of acronyms in the title. I'm not saying that those stories shouldn't be posted at all, I'm just saying your criteria for what *belongs* or doesn't belong on slashdot is off base. Let the market decide.

      For the record I think a story about a 3,500 year old living organism dying is incredibly interesting!

      --
      while [ 1 ]; do echo -n -e "\xe2\x95\xb$((($RANDOM&1)+1))"; done
    30. Re:Sigh by rwa2 · · Score: 0

      Word. I also found this infinitely more interesting than most of the legal proceedings and politics threads that parade through, even if those are somewhat more tech related.

      /Had thought the oldest trees were only around ~1000 years old, and that's even after visiting Gen. Sherman.

    31. Re:Sigh by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's a Radiolab episode that covers the story of Prometheus being cut down. Sad story.

      http://www.radiolab.org/2010/jun/28/

    32. Re:Sigh by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      Some of us science geek/nerd types are actually biology/botany nerds. This is definitely in the "stuff that matters" category for us. Computers exist to do plant synecology simulations and model plant community migrations in geologic time.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    33. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 'nerd' is not specifically someone interested in computers. I'm sure there's a hundred definitions of 'nerd' depending on who you ask, but my definition includes 'strong interest in things not normally found interesting by the common man'. Finding news about the oldest living things on earth interesting would definitely fall into that. If you want it to spark discussion, you could discuss longevity of different living creatures, and how that can be harnessed for example.

      That said, I'm also a computer nerd, but I ALSO find this story really damn interesting. I've always loved reading about the 'extremes' in nature. It's like talk about Turritopsis nutricula, which is biologically immortal. Most people's eyes would glaze over if one started talking about this, but hey... it's the type of thing some nerds may find interesting... myself included.

      So say and think what you will, but one way or another, I'm personally glad this story was posted since it very much interests me (as opposed to say... the book reviews about X programming language... god those are boring stories to me), and I likely would not have heard about it elsewhere.

    34. Re:Sigh by Archimagus · · Score: 2

      A legitimate question. With a reasonable answer. While I live really close to this park, there are several in the area. As a playground there are other parks in the area that my kids prefer and so we go there more often. It's been maybe 2 years since we have been to that park. My oldest is now almost 9, so I'm sure he remembers going there, but I don't know if he really remembers the tree. My daughter just turned 5. I'm sure she doesn't remember going there.

    35. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There, see, already another front page story about a video of the Moon. Whip it out and beat it, happy now?

    36. Re:Sigh by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't it be on /. ?
      This is a 'nerdy' item, and a rather sad one as well. Rather this than the endless, tedious and (to me and many others) redundant posts relating to US politics.

      We need fair and ballanced reporting.

    37. Re:Sigh by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      I think the real question is what is it doing on Slashdot again. I seem to remember this story coming up when it was first published almost a month ago.

      This is the wake.

    38. Re:Sigh by teeloo · · Score: 1

      Interesting facts. Terrible writing. ("mileniums"?).

    39. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the dumbing down of Slashdot. Soon it'll be no different from Huffington Post, Endgadget, Reddit or TMZ.

    40. Re:Sigh by Ziwcam · · Score: 1

      In addition, it's old news. Wikipedia says the fire happened two weeks ago http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Senator_(tree)

    41. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's on Slashdot so the readers can blame Apple for the tree's death.

    42. Re:Sigh by Phat_Tony · · Score: 5, Interesting

      People interested by that may also be interested to know the demise of the former oldest living thing in the world, the Prometheus Tree, which a graduate student cut down so he could count the rings.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    43. Re:Sigh by Wandering+Voice · · Score: 1

      I recall seeing a documentary or news show on the oldest tree alive and was located in an aboriginal territory in Australia. The location wasn't being shared as people were afraid of vandalism and tourism damaging the tree and surrounding area. If I remember correctly, this was in the late 90s, so it's possible others have been found which are older.

      Still though, very interesting. And this news here is a bit sad, seeing a tree of this age burn away.

      P.S. Having grown up in a small town in rural Wisconsin, I always thought that the term 'Tree Hugger' referred to the boys on the winning football team, with their Camaros and Trans Ams, wrapping around trees and telephone poles after their big wins.

    44. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up about 5 miles from this tree, and there are two significant reasons that people who live close to this park don't frequent it on a very regular basis:

      1. Location - The park is a few miles from any residential neighborhoods. It's tucked away off of an access road between two small highways in an area zoned for low density industry.

      2. Reputation - The park is widely known as a "hookup" spot (think Highway rest stop) largely used by gay prostitutes. The fact that the Park's main feature was a 90-foot tall phallic-shaped tree named "The Senator" probably explains how this came to be. Anyway, I know more than one person who has gone to visit the tree and come across something they didn't really go there to see.

    45. Re:Sigh by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      It's very hard to determine the exact age of a tree that old, especially while its still alive.

      There's also debate about what constitutes a tree. For example, Pando is a clonal colony of quaking aspen. While the individual trees (or stems if you want to get into the biology) may only live for a century or so, the colony itself is estimated around 80,000 years old. Clonal colonies like this could be considered biologically immortal.

    46. Re:Sigh by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      If you're not USian, you don't count.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    47. Re:Sigh by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      And if my first post wasn't enough proof I spend too much time on Wikipedia, this previous post should be proof plenty.

      Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_long-living_organisms for more

    48. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Angel Oak in South Carolina is believed to be 1500 years old. Looks like something out of Lord of the Rings.

    49. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a none American it's more interesting than the daily ya boh suck crap fest that the is American election trail.

    50. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/03/old-tree-gallery/all/1

    51. Re:Sigh by cyberchondriac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In 1964, there was another one nicknamed Prometheus that was believed to be the oldest tree. The US Forest Service sent a guy in with a chainsaw to cut it down so they could verify its age. It turned out to be over 4900 years old. No older bristlecones have been found. Other forestry people were sufficiently outraged by this that it turned into a standard textbook-level warning, and people who study the oldest bristlecones refuse to report their locations, to protect them from the Forest Service as well as from common vandals.

      I know it's "just" a tree, and I'm not one to go cavorting about with greenpeace and whatnot, but wtf? What kind of stupidity is that- I can't believe they did that. The thing was close to 5,000 years old and they just killed it out of curiosity?
      Anything that lasts that long deserves some respect.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    52. Re:Sigh by war4peace · · Score: 1

      149 comments proving you wrong.
      Just sayin'.

      If YOU are not interested, it doesn't mean NOBODY is.

      I'd consider the combustion start method(s) interesting from a technical perspective. I honestly wasn't aware that wind friction can set a tree on fire. OR that a week old lighting strike can do that as well.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    53. Re:Sigh by Doc+Hoss · · Score: 0

      You asked where the 4 other oldest trees are...pretty sure the oldest is Methuselah in eastern California's Sierra Nevada range. Beyond that, not sure.

    54. Re:Sigh by Doc+Hoss · · Score: 0

      Meant to put this in my first post. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methuselah_(tree) Posting from mobile and it doesn't seem to want to create a link...sorry!

    55. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you have to be a bit more subtle than that.

    56. Re:Sigh by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Obviously we need a post about the state of the youngest trees in the world so we can get their view on this important issue.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    57. Re:Sigh by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Those trees are clones of the same ancient root system. For a fascinating read, look up the wiki article on the Pando clonal colony of quaking aspens - they've estimated the root system to be 80,000 years old and covers 106 acres!

      'Course, better to not rile up the nutcases on the age of these things. If somebody really wants to believe in something, you won't change their mind with mere factual observations...

      --
      +1 Disagree
    58. Re:Sigh by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but a smoldering weeks-old lightning strike or heat from friction by the wind! A fascinating 3500 year old tree is destroyed in a fascinating way. My nerd juices are certainly flowing...

      --
      +1 Disagree
    59. Re:Sigh by Wandering+Voice · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link and the info in previous post. Very very interesting.

    60. Re:Sigh by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Obviously we need a post about the state of the youngest trees in the world so we can get their view on this important issue.

      Now that we have that, we can get on to the politics of other countries which are under-reported.

    61. Re:Sigh by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Apparently the tree has been involved with Tweets for thousands of years.......

      And one day there was spontaneous combustion in a pile of owl shit.

    62. Re:Sigh by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      Methuselah looks more like abstract art than a tree. Suprising that the oldest tree is in such a dry area.

    63. Re:Sigh by pclminion · · Score: 1

      It’s not tech related, it’s not significantly world changing to fall into the “stuff that matters” side of things, and it’s not even related to a topic that frequently interests this demographic (anyone here know off-hand where the other 4 older trees are?).

      Uh, it's a physics story man. The theory is the wind was blowing so hard the friction of the bark moving back and forth reached the ignition point and the tree was literally "blown into flames." I fully expected to read the comments and see total carnage as informed citizens of Slashdot shot the idea to pieces. I'm completely f'ing disappointed.

    64. Re:Sigh by internic · · Score: 1

      I agree that ultimately what is the oldest living thing comes down to a question of semantics. A distinction that's often made is clonal versus non-clonal organisms. I've seen Methuselah called the oldest non-clonal organism. The creosote bush that you mention is a clonal organism, as is Pando, a clonal colony of aspen thought to be something like 80,000 years old.

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    65. Re:Sigh by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've always thought it arrogant of the tech nerds on /. who condemn anything not tech-related as "non-nerd."

      "I'm not personally interested" != "this is irrelevant to nerds everywhere"

    66. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, mystery solved. People smoke cigarettes after sex. There was something fishy about the whole 'lightning smoldering for weeks' theory.

      But this brings up a more puzzling question. Why are gay people meeting in the woods for sex? It can't be discrimination related, because they do it here in Seattle, too (yes, in city parks), where there are plenty of gay bars.

    67. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to leave something to profounding show you're an idior, dude. FTFY

    68. Re:Sigh by youngone · · Score: 1

      It might be a quite common thing, to keep the location of unique botanical specimens secret. My mother is a botanist, and about twenty years ago she rediscovered a thought-to-be-extict native* orchid. She has been sworn to secrecy by our Department of Conservation as to exactly where. * To New Zealand

    69. Re:Sigh by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... so they survived through the last glacial period. In Sweden. Was that area not covered in ice or did they go into deep sleep under ice for 40 or 50,000 years and sprout again when they were uncovered?

    70. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went this summer to the grove of the Bristlecone Pines in the White Mountains, and I was under the impression that quite a lot of them are really old. Of Methuselah they just took a core sample in 1957. Those trees aren't especially large or wide as the living conditions are so harsh. Nothing compared to the picture in Florida from the NPR story.

    71. Re:Sigh by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      The Pando colony is in central Utah, so while it's seen significant changes, I don't believe it was ever buried under an ice sheet.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    72. Re:Sigh by mkstowegnv · · Score: 1

      This assertion - that the tree was cut down to verify the age either by the graduate student or the Forest Service as intimated below, fitting stereotypes of ruthless truth seeking scientists or bumbling governmental employees obscures the fact that the graduate student was trying to recover an expensive broken bit and had no idea how old the tree was - see http://www.wanderingnotlost.org/2011/05/the-bristlecone-pine-and-the-death-of-prometheus/ for the more nuanced reality.

    73. Re:Sigh by pspahn · · Score: 1

      I think the Methuselah tree is actually just inside the border in Nevada in the White Mountains.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    74. Re:Sigh by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did some research after that and found it was in Utah. I was misreading and implying it was in Sweden from the previous comment.

    75. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His kids might have left his house many years ago...or do only people who have children under 20 live in your world, Logan?

    76. Re:Sigh by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      It is believed that this colony of trees which are actually a part of one organism (they all have same underground root system) is about 80.000 years old!

      I cannot conceive of this...that thing is ancient.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  4. It's an omen! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    What's the year again? (Observe confirmation bias to have a smash year this year.)

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:It's an omen! by Anrego · · Score: 1

      A good omen? :(

      I guess omens are rarely good.. especially when they involve things burning :(

  5. Errr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mother Nature claimed one of her oldest living specimens

    Anthropomorphize much?

  6. Too little too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I live right by the park, I could have thrown a rock at the tree. It happened January 16th, this story is old.

    1. Re:Too little too late by Shotgun · · Score: 2, Funny

      I live halfway up the US coast in North Carolina. I too could have thrown a rock at the tree.

      Wouldn't have hit it, but....

      8*)

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  7. Natural Causes by batquux · · Score: 2

    Natural causes? Freak fire? Which is it?

    1. Re:Natural Causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't think fires are natural?

    2. Re:Natural Causes by Prefader · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that a fire is not natural?

    3. Re:Natural Causes by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To a tree a freak fire IS "natural causes." Just as being eaten by lions is "natural causes" to a zebra.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Natural Causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't fire natural?

    5. Re:Natural Causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agree. Better title would have been "oldest tree dies of smoking related causes.".

    6. Re:Natural Causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but a human that burns in a fire did not die of natural causes.

    7. Re:Natural Causes by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn you, Phillip Morris!!!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:Natural Causes by batquux · · Score: 2

      Nah, it's just that "freak" fire kinda suggests otherwise to me.

    9. Re:Natural Causes by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

      If a person were to die in a naturally caused forest fire, it's generally not attributed to natural causes. It's attributed to burning in a fire.

    10. Re:Natural Causes by multisync · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To a tree a freak fire IS "natural causes." Just as being eaten by lions is "natural causes" to a zebra

      I suppose any death is by "natural causes," unless one dies at the hands of some supernatural entity.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    11. Re:Natural Causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you suggesting that a knife, made from materials that came from the earth, is not natural?
      What about bullets?

    12. Re:Natural Causes by kungfugleek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. Trees need to keep the smoke inside. If you let the smoke out, they die.

    13. Re:Natural Causes by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      Heroin is a natural plant, so an OD is natural causes by that logic. I believe natural causes is supposed to imply the body just wearing out on it's own and not caused by outside stimulants. Getting struck by lightning is pretty equally lethal for trees and humans alike. But I've never seen a death certificate attribute being struck by lightning a natural cause.

    14. Re:Natural Causes by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that a knife, made from materials that came from the earth, is not natural? What about bullets?
      it's all a line-drawing game. In reality, there is no such thing as "unnatural", unless you are a believer in the supernatural. However, human beings and their inventions, processes, and affects are considered to be either a part of nature or apart from nature depending on the current agenda at hand.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    15. Re:Natural Causes by hedleyroos · · Score: 1

      It was so old it was bald.

    16. Re:Natural Causes by Zharr · · Score: 1

      Trees and electroic device are alike in that regard.

    17. Re:Natural Causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and all the people in the last aircraft accident died of natural causes, because gravity is a natural cause.

    18. Re:Natural Causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So really death by old age should be death by unnatural causes, since we don't know what causes it.

    19. Re:Natural Causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even then it's natural causes. A supernatural entity is just a plain old entity when and if determined it, indeed, exists.

    20. Re:Natural Causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did it.. I caused the fire.. I'm shooting for the next 4 oldest next!

    21. Re:Natural Causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose any death is by "natural causes," unless one dies at the hands of some supernatural entity.

      Like this guy did, should you choose to believe it....

      21 And upon a set day Herod, arrayed in royal apparel, sat upon his throne, and made an oration unto them.
      22 And the people gave a shout, saying, It is the voice of a god, and not of a man.
      23 And immediately the angel of the Lord smote him, because he gave not God the glory: and he was eaten of worms, and gave up the ghost.

      Acts 12:21 - 23 KJV

    22. Re:Natural Causes by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      "Natural causes" means it was not caused by a human, basically. No-one set it on fire or poisoned it.

      It is an important concept in law. For example if your pet dog destroys something you are liable because you are deemed to be in control of the dog. If your pet cat shreds your neighbours egg plant then it isn't your fault because cats are free spirits and inherently uncontrollable. The egg plant would be a victim of natural causes.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:Natural Causes by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Because normally a human will run away from a fire. There must have been something that prevented them from doing the natural thing and escaping. Trees, on the other hand, are immobile and it is natural for them to be destroyed.

      It is all about the default outcome. If you are old it is normal for your body to stop working without any outside influence. If you run up some stairs and have a heart attack then your actions triggered it, so it isn't a natural thing to happen.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:Natural Causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heroin is a natural plant,

      So are the rocks your head is made of.

      Hint: diacetyl morphine ain't a plant, it's made in a lab from an extract from a plant. Duh.

  8. The wind caused a fire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More proof of global warming. Pretty soon we'll need one of these just to step outside!

  9. Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In Florida? Are you serious? Does anyone else realize that unless there's a hurricane Florida (especially central Florida) is basically a dead zone for winds. That's not to say a freak wind storm couldn't occur but I've lived in some pretty windy places and never heard of a fire started by buffeting winds. Lightning, yes. I've googled for it, can someone point me to evidence of this phenomena actually happening? Having tried to get a spark or start fire by rubbing two sticks together, I can tell you that it would indeed by a freak occurrence if wind did just that.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      My best guess is that it would be a localized wind pattern caused by a hill, valley, etc or even buildings if its anywhere near a city. it doesn't take much. Combine it with exceptionally dry air and it wouldn't take much for static electricity to start arcing. If there's any source of flammable gases such as hydrogen or methane beign stuck in the tree, it would take that much less of a spark to ignite.

      However, I'm still betting on lighting or a stray cigarette.

    2. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, I'm still betting on lighting or a stray cigarette.

      But wouldn't they have found remenance of the butt?

    3. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's so improbable. Such a freak occurrence might only happen once every three and a half thousand years...

    4. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

      >> hydrogen or methane beign stuck in the tree

      So you're saying flatulent possums are responsible then?

    5. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I live within 30 minutes of the tree, and we hadn't had any type of lightning for well over a month or two. The whole thing comes off as a bid odd here..

    6. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by LastGunslinger · · Score: 1

      Not saying this couldn't happen, but central Florida is flat and humid and the closest tall buildings to that park are in Orlando, many miles away.

    7. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by hedpe2003 · · Score: 1

      My best guess is that it would be a localized wind pattern caused by a hill, valley, etc or even buildings if its anywhere near a city. it doesn't take much. Combine it with exceptionally dry air and it wouldn't take much for static electricity to start arcing. If there's any source of flammable gases such as hydrogen or methane beign stuck in the tree, it would take that much less of a spark to ignite.

      However, I'm still betting on lighting or a stray cigarette.

      We've had dry conditions lately here in central Florida - with the respective fire warnings given with the weather, so this sounds reasonable.

      Personally my best guess at the cause is the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics. In absense of an observer - there both was a fire, and was not. Then add in dry conditions... and some lady's observation... and BAM. Wind waves collapse and cause a fire.

      Ok, I’m not normally one of the guy’s who says this... but The hell is this doing on Slashdot?.

      Does that satisfy your news for nerds desire?

      --
      Comprehensive solutions via a competition of ideas like no other.
    8. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My best guess is that it would be a localized wind pattern caused by a hill, valley, etc or even buildings if its anywhere near a city. it doesn't take much. Combine it with exceptionally dry air and it wouldn't take much for static electricity to start arcing.

      As somebody who lives in Florida, I will point out that an 'exceptionally dry day' is still 60% humidity here. And the thing lived in a swamp... dry winds are not in the cards.

      I had seen it several times. It was an amazing tree, sad to see it go.

    9. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live within 30 minutes of the tree, and we hadn't had any type of lightning for well over a month or two. The whole thing comes off as a bid odd here..

      I blame the Tea Party.

    10. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I blame you Tea Party haters

    11. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd put a $50 bet on them knowing beyond a shadow of a doubt it was arson, but are refusing to acknowledge it as such to deny the point of the arson... to be known as the person who burned down one of the oldest trees on earth. There's probably a specific term for this type of action, but it reminds me of Damnatio memoriae, where the goal is to erase someone's name from history. If this tree was burned deliberately, then it's somewhat like the story of Herostratus who burned the Temple of Artemis in order to be famous.

      Since wiping someone's name from history isn't exactly an option nowadays, the next best bet is to simply refuse to acknowledge the arsonist's existence.

    12. Re:Friction Caused by Buffeting Winds?! by trout007 · · Score: 1

      What you linked to is a power map. We get wind all the time here but it is only as fronts go across the state. You wouldn't want to put a wind turbine here but we gets strong winds quite frequently.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  10. Mixed feelings by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

    On one hand one of the oldest trees in the world is no more, but on the other hand a Senator died in a fire...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Mixed feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for a mod point...

    2. Re:Mixed feelings by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      You are the man!

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    3. Re:Mixed feelings by Fjandr · · Score: 2

      If only this would happen to all the Senators. Maybe they'll all be struck by lightning and burst into flames a few days later. One can only dream...

  11. Got that right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    First:

    Seminole County investigators first pronounced the Big Tree Park fire suspicious. But as the day wore on, state arson inspectors determined the inferno was not deliberately set but rather was caused by a curious confluence of natural events described as being either a weeks- old lightning strike that smoldered until combustion occured, or friction caused by buffeting winds that ignited a spark and erupted in flames.

    Then they said:

    The national landmark burned yesterday from the inside out, ...

    Alrighty then.

    Out of curiousity, if I lit some dry grass on fire and chucked it into the hollow of the tree, I'm real curious how they could tell if it was arson?

  12. Sad by eternaldoctorwho · · Score: 1

    I for one am sorry to see a living monument such as this go. I have grown up seeing the forests around my home killed due to a massive slash-and-burn, all in the name of "progress," when in fact we did not need another warehouse doomed to be shut down in 5 years. The result is that there is rarely to be seen any tree older than 25 or 30 years old. I don't know, mod me down if you want, but I believe that any currently living being that was around before the printing press was invented certainly deserves a degree of respect and a chance to keep living.

  13. Re:Got that right! by Inda · · Score: 2

    I wondered the same.

    They can normally tell if a fire was started by an arsonist by finding accelerant residue, such as petrol.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  14. that tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, that tree was smoking hot.

  15. Old Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in central Florida and this happened about 3 weeks ago.

  16. Something really old died in Florida? by rbrander · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow. I wonder if that ever happened before.

  17. Clarification please by justthinkit · · Score: 1
    Does BB mean this or this? Google wasn't sure.
    .

    Whatever happened to using the full form, with the abbreviation in brackets before using the abbreviated form?

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:Clarification please by somersault · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm guessing he means BoingBoing.

      When I hear "boing boing" I just think "TITS!", but apparently it's a new aggregator..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Clarification please by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I hear "boing boing" I just think "TITS!", but apparently it's a new aggregator..

      The two concepts are not mutually exclusive. In fact ....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Clarification please by Bitch-Face+Jones · · Score: 1

      Boing-boing has been around for a while, now. I think it actually started out as a 'zine in the early 90's (remember those?)

    4. Re:Clarification please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From where I come from, "BB" means "bareback". I'll let you figure that one out yourself.

      ps: captcha is "permeate" :-)

    5. Re:Clarification please by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      No BB means Bulletin Board. They still exist ... somewhere.... out there....

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  18. Re:Got that right! by batquux · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think it was the light from Venus that was focused through a lens of marsh gas that started the fire.

  19. I'll miss you Treebeard by StoutFiles · · Score: 4, Funny

    You decided I wasn't an orc. I'll never forget you.

  20. global warming! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    wow, that's not carbon-neutral...

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  21. Incorrect department by cadeon · · Score: 0

    This story should be coming from the pre-primary-bush-burning dept., as it's old news and therefore occurred before Florida's closed primary.

  22. Paper ballot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is how nature voted in the Republican primaries.

  23. hey idiot. by unity100 · · Score: 1, Informative

    a 3500 year old tree is a major scientific item. a more exciting tree would be a 4500 year old tree. or a 5500 year old tree. there's one in some american desert.

    1. Re:hey idiot. by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      4600 something, a Bristlecone Pine in the White Mountains in California.

      --
      +1 Disagree
  24. Greenpeace explaination: Not natural causes by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    This tree clearly self-immolated to protest deforestation and global warming. Maybe this will start a general protest among the trees and instead of an Arab Spring we will have an Arbor Spring.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  25. wasn't natural causes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT WAS A FIRE
    if no fire it would live , its like saying you died cause the electrical outlet blew and your home caught fire, thus it was electricity that killed you , when in facts it was improper wiring or whatever....

  26. Fire Prevention by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    If only Florida had imported elephants to prevent wild fires this tree would still be alive today.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Fire Prevention by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      I think you meant rhinoceros, not elephant, to prevent wild fires.

    2. Re:Fire Prevention by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1
      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  27. half-life of an immortal human is 400 years by peter303 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    15% of us die of accidents, violence or suicide in our 80 year lifespans. Eliminating all natural causes of death would only extend our lives so much, unless we practiced a culture of extreme safety. (This has been the theme of many scifi stories about immortals.)
    Some trees may essentially immortal, but suffer from weather or animal trauma etc. Almost nothing is alive older than 10K years.

    1. Re:half-life of an immortal human is 400 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would probably extend our lives more than you think. Some people (mostly young men) are much more prone to accidents and being in violent situations than others. The one's who are going to commit suicide are already doing it. I think the only people who would commit suicide at an extended age would be those that have grown bored with life.

    2. Re:half-life of an immortal human is 400 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a pretty cool exception to prove your rule (i.e. the organism is absolutely ancient, but only because it's spread itself beyond a single point of failure):

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pando_(tree)

      Apparently, biologists think the last time this thing "mated" was the last ice age. Since, it's been expanding using it's own DNA, as is common in very arid climates (the New England aspens don't have to grow this way - they reproduce as normal).

    3. Re:half-life of an immortal human is 400 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd imagine humans would be more cautious and relaxed if they were immortal. (e.g. why drive at 50mph, when you can walk... etc.).

      Also, immortal in what sense? as in, not die of cancer? 'cause one or another cancer would get 99% of us within 100 years or so.

    4. Re:half-life of an immortal human is 400 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing then that life is a lot safer now than it was even fifty years ago. Wars have been declining through history in terms of number of people affected, we have been paying increasing attention to safety, criminal violence figures have been down for decades... Maybe it's because we're getting older and it all starts to matter more? Whatever the case may be, it seems that in a small way we're inching towards those science fiction stories.

  28. Moses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That means it sprouted about the same time that biblical history has Moses talking to God via a burning bush, and when Greece was in its pre-Homeric Bronze Age."

    And note, that this was merely 1000 years after Noah put all biological life (except the poor the dinosaurs) on the Ark.

  29. It's the drought by FridayBob · · Score: 2

    Florida is supposed to be subtropical with a relatively wet climate, but at the moment the place seems bone dry. Many wetlands have simply dried up and people fear that even most 'gator holes will not be deep enough for the reptiles to survive any significant frosts (the poor critters look pretty skinny as it is). Therefore, I guess it's not totally surprising that parts of the forest seem to be going up in flames spontaneously. When I lived there as a kid in the 60s and 70s, drought was never an issue, but now it has been for more than the past decade. To me, this is yet another strong sign that, climatologically, we live in a changing world.

  30. Weeks Old Story, I mean Weeks old by realsilly · · Score: 2

    This story happened weeks ago, and originally it was suspected as arson, and that it was in too dense of an area for Firefighters to reach. Here is a link to the NPR story.

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/01/17/145342304/one-of-worlds-oldest-cypress-trees-the-senator-burns-in-florida.

    This happened in mid-January. "On Monday (Jan. 16, 2012) Seminole County firefighter Al Caballero applied water to the smoldering base of The Senator. "

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    1. Re:Weeks Old Story, I mean Weeks old by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      This story happened weeks ago, and originally it was suspected as arson, and that it was in too dense of an area for Firefighters to reach. Here is a link to the NPR story.

      http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/01/17/145342304/one-of-worlds-oldest-cypress-trees-the-senator-burns-in-florida.

      This happened in mid-January. "On Monday (Jan. 16, 2012) Seminole County firefighter Al Caballero applied water to the smoldering base of The Senator. "

      What is two weeks to a 3,500 ear old tree?

  31. New York City Tree by PPH · · Score: 2

    It just spent winters in Florida.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  32. The forbidden fruit. by Things_falling_apart · · Score: 1

    Wow this tree is old enough to be the forbidden fruit tree from the Garden of Eden! Maybe if we took a core sample we would find a heart saying "Adam + Eve" :)

    1. Re:The forbidden fruit. by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Wow this tree is old enough to be the forbidden fruit tree from the Garden of Eden! Maybe if we took a core sample we would find a heart saying "Adam + Eve" :)

      Shhh .. you're encouraging heretical questions like "how did it survive the flood?"

    2. Re:The forbidden fruit. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      it was on the Ark as a potted plant, duh! You unbelievers always use the most contrived scenarios instead of common sense.

    3. Re:The forbidden fruit. by TigerTime · · Score: 1

      Are you confusing the time of Jesus Christ with that of the floods? From estimates I've read, they speculate that the flood and Noah as described in the Bible occurred around 2500BC, which was 4500years ago and well before this tree came into existence.

      If you're going to try and dog a religion, at least know what the hell you're talking about. You'll sound less like a troll.

    4. Re:The forbidden fruit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4500 years ago is closer to 3500 years than 2000 years ago. It may be well before non-existent "flood" but then again Jesus never came to the America's (my apologies to the Mormon's) and the Garden could be anywhere. You sound bitter, Mr. Christian-with-a-thin-skin.

  33. The Perfect Crime! by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was it natural causes or was it... MURDER?! Certainly no one would SUSPECT the other trees in the area! But they all just STOOD there!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  34. No photo? by MaWeiTao · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like how the damn article refers to this tree being majestic but then doesn't even feature a photo of the tree. Instead they present the reader with three useless photos.

    In this day and age it's inexcusable for a news site to not feature big, quality photos. It took me all of 5 seconds to do a search online and find a good photo of the tree. You mean to tell me the so-called journalist who wrote this article couldn't have done the same? And then get some intern to get in touch with the rights-holder for permission to run it?

  35. late to the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was news two weeks ago. Seriously slashdot is so late to the game these days on everything.

  36. It is climatology related by Openstandards.net · · Score: 1
    Now that the tree is dead, the question becomes, will there be anything left we can use to study its rings to build our scientific knowledge of changes in the past 3500 years. Unfortunately, the story itself does not cover this angle.

    http://www.priweb.org/globalchange/climatechange/studyingcc/scc_01.html

  37. Or Was It... by CMYKjunkie · · Score: 1

    ...M U R D E R???????????

  38. Goodnight sweet prince by niado · · Score: 1

    And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest. =[

  39. maybe Monday but not this Monday by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Mother Nature claimed one of her oldest living specimens (Monday) in a freak ...

    I saw this on the news weeks ago. The article itself is dated Tuesday, January 17, 2012 (Last Monday Was January 30th). Shouldn't someone catch this stuff before it is published?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  40. Natural causes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not what we include under "natural causes" when a person dies!

    ``John Doe died of natural causes when he fell asleep with a cigaratte ...''

    Natural causes usually has connotations of something related to old age within the organism itself, and not some external accident.

  41. But but ... by 32771 · · Score: 1

    People are natural causes too!

    Now if they just wouldn't insist to be some sort of animated machine of some sort.

    --
    Je me souviens.
  42. too old! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ugh....if you're 3500 dead at years old...any death is natural causes.

  43. forgive me if its been said already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it happens sometimes, people just explode; natural causes

  44. So if I'm burnt alive... by Nyder · · Score: 1

    ... I died of natural causes?

    --
    Be seeing you...
  45. That tree was here before jesus was born. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weird to think about but some of these crazy old trees have been around longer than the guy whose birth we base our new calender around.

  46. Forest Conservation! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    "Yup, that there tree WAS 4900 years old, waddayou know!"

    Also define a living thing? Typically beyond single cell it is something that is made up of other living component parts.

    Some hippy will point out that GAIA is the oldest living thing at 3 or 4 billion years old... :P

    1. Re:Forest Conservation! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      define a living thing? Typically beyond single cell it is something that is made up of other living component parts.

      Yeah, but a minor problem with most trees is that, strictly speaking, only the thin outer layers are "alive", and that part is typically only a few years old. The inner wood of the trunk isn't actually alive, and that's the part that may be hundreds or thousands of years old. Of course, that wood is a rather integral part of the tree; it's just not made of living cells.

      The "clonal" organisms like the creosote bush is even more extreme, since its older woody part is both dead and non-structural. The bushes in a creosote ring may be a few hundred years old, and they may be still physically connected to the remnant wood inside the ring, but it'd be pretty easy to argue that the inner wood is no longer important to the living parts, which are just the bushes.

      But we consider our hair and nails as a part of us, even though past the roots, they're made of dead cells. So it somewhat makes sense to consider a creosote ring as a single living organism, even if the central part is long dead, has no structural role, and removing it wouldn't harm the remaining bushes.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  47. Home Tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but how many Nav'i were consumed in the fire?

  48. Re:Got that right! by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Actually I've seen trees set alight by underground fires. It works like this: A forest fire burns a tree, setting old roots smouldering and can survive underground for months. This can travel a hundred metres or so and strike another tree.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!