Slashdot Mirror


Next-Gen Spacesuits

ambermichelle writes "Outer space is a hostile environment for humans, characterized by an airless vacuum, thermal extremes, ionizing radiation and speeding micro meteoroids. Less well-known are the dangers posed by long-term exposure to microgravity or zero-g conditions, which over time severely saps the strength of astronauts' muscles and bones. Several researchers are working to develop new spacesuit designs that could help counteract these threats as well as avoid some of the familiar drawbacks of current spacesuit models such as bulk, weight and rigidity."

123 comments

  1. Incentives for Space Travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When astronauts start looking like Samus Aran, with or without the power armor, I expect interest in space travel will increase dramatically.

    1. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't worry.

      No one is ever going into space again.

      There's really nothing there, anyways. Just the fantasies of exploration, by creatures unable to even understand themselves.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, yeah, without the suit... i too am a man and & + i get all excited when i think about women. right on. get bent.

    3. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you care about your karma, you should post nothing less than grandiose delusions about how the species must leave this mud ball. Not how fragile and short-lived we are, and how empty space is, and how pathetically small our reach into space has been so far.

      Reality in Space Nutter threads is *not* welcome.

    4. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really. What has mankind to offer the universe, but its appetites and its quest for novelty? Get your act together back home.

      Everything out there is different, except you. Your essential problems are portable.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by INeededALogin · · Score: 1

      Sorry... modpoints expired today. This is one of the most insightful comments I have ever read on Slashdot.

    6. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by zill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Insightful? I hope you realize that Earth's orbit will be engulfed by the Sun in a few billion years. Not leaving the planet = extinction.

    7. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not welcome extinction with open arms ;)

    8. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by _4rp4n3t · · Score: 1

      Because it's not in our nature to do so.

    9. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by wickedskaman · · Score: 1

      It could be one day. :)

      --
      Sand's overrated... it's just tiny little rocks.
    10. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh, this entire thread deserves a -1 Overly Pessimistic

    11. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "Because it's not in our nature to do so."

      Take another look at your average voter and say that again with a straight face.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by BlindRobin · · Score: 1

      my aren't we optimistic...

    13. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by zill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IMHO it's quite certain that mankind will fail. But that doesn't mean we should just give up and stop trying right now.

    14. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      If a group of humans embraces death they are usually called a sekt and don't gather many followers

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    15. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you realize that just as there were no humans a million years ago, there will be no humans a million years from now. It's a little thing called evolution. It didn't magically stop because you read garbage sci-fi as a kid. When the oil runs out, there won't be enough spare energy left over to fly a single weekly 747 across the ocean. Get over yourself. We possess neither the energy, nor the technology to do anything more than what we've done so far. It's over.

    16. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by ericartman · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Now for the tinfoil hat. We seem to have lost our will to explore space, it's not just money, people hardly care about space travel anymore. Reminds me of the Mule in Asimov the Foundation Series. Remember all the SF stories of Aliens denying us the right to space? Why send ships to stop us when just a few mental tweaks will take care of it? My only hope is breaking the heliosphere is a tripwire like the obelisk in 2001. I know I gotta turn off the TV. But Momma thats where the fun is.

    17. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is.... we should all go buy new shoes?

    18. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      It'd be a good start.

      There is an inner space, as vast and unexplored as the outer space. The ability to explore it is in your hands today.

      Until that is done, the only thing to find outside is just "more of the same."

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    19. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, German and Austrian sparkling wines are usually called 'sekt'. Funky religious groups are often called 'sects'. What the average slashdotter has no experience with is called 'sex'.

    20. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Fortunately our tech will be far more efficient than a 747. You seem to be claiming that technological development has stopped. Maybe you just fell off the train?

    21. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The underlying physics has plateaued, yes. You can only improve a jet turbine within confines established decades ago. Do you think there is a chemical fuel better than kerosene out there? Besides the fact that we'd need to manufacture this magic fuel, we know what it's like, we've already tried it. It's corrosive, toxic and damaging. Do you think there are other cycles than the Brayton cycle? Do you think there are other ways to convert potential energy of a fuel into kinetic energy than Newton's Laws? Do you think we've missed elements in the periodic table, and that they'd have magical properties?

      You know, there's a reason planes from 40 years ago are still

      1) Recognizably airplanes to modern audiences, unlike say, an IBM S/360

      2) Still in use today.

      There's a reason my family's collection of 19th century pistols and rifles would still work today. The chemistry and physics hasn't changed, only our manufacturing capacity *within* those limits has changed.

      Have things improved in the last decades? Yes, of course, but not by the orders of magnitude that would justify the insane delusional Space Nutter pet theories of manned space "exploration", "tourism" and all the other garbage you see on slash.

      So yes, unless all the engineers are wrong and the physicists have missed HUGE chunks of natural law, we are scraping away at single-digit improvements on existing, well established limits.

    22. Re:Incentives for Space Travel by Alan426 · · Score: 1

      After the next election cycle? Not interested.

  2. they'll come in handy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...when we resume manned space exploration. and develop a manned space vehicle to take us there again.

    1. Re:they'll come in handy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does the new suit recycle urine into drinking water, like the old ones did? I read this article with excitement, hoping for some good descriptions of the newer, state-of-the-art in pee-drinking. It doesn't say very much tho. I hope if these do come in handy, there will be plenty of need for this. The pee part, you know. Weeeeee!

    2. Re:they'll come in handy... by rossdee · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Does the new suit recycle urine into drinking water,"

      Yeah, that could be very useful for other environments than space, such as when global warming turns the earth into a desert.

      "Urine and feces are processed in the thigh pads" - Leit Kynes

    3. Re:they'll come in handy... by EdIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Urine and feces are processed in the thigh pads" - Leit Kynes

      Yeah.... I bought the whole urine deal, but not the feces processing. I have pinched some loafs that I seriously doubt any technology, that is wearable, could process into anything useful.

      How the fuck can the suit process corn? Corn chips just magically come out of a pocket?

    4. Re:they'll come in handy... by Fned · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a lot easier if all you ever eat is the stuff that comes out of the thigh pads.

    5. Re:they'll come in handy... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Isn't there diminishing returns at some point?

      If all you ate was literally shit would you not starve to death?

    6. Re:they'll come in handy... by pnot · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Urine and feces are processed in the thigh pads" - Leit Kynes

      Yeah.... I bought the whole urine deal, but not the feces processing. I have pinched some loafs that I seriously doubt any technology, that is wearable, could process into anything useful.

      How the fuck can the suit process corn? Corn chips just magically come out of a pocket?

      I always assumed that the "processing" just extracted water, leaving some kind of dessicated shit powder that gets dumped. Far more plausible than reprocessing shit into food, though scarcely comfortable or fragrant. In Dune the smell of a Fremen sietch is described as an assault on the nostrils... I think we can guess why.

    7. Re:they'll come in handy... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Fetch me the Internapult!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    8. Re:they'll come in handy... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Yes of course; your digestive system extracts nutrients from what you eat. It's almost certainly not 100% efficient so you may well be able to get more out if you ingest it again (once it's been suitably processed to make it ingestible/palatable), but eventually you'll have removed all that you can remove. Once you reach that point eating it again won't do you any good.

    9. Re:they'll come in handy... by grahammm · · Score: 1

      How would this work for female astronauts? For males, external catheters and urine collection bags are established technology and could conceivably be incorporated into a close fitting space suit. For a female,. urine collection/recycling in a suit does not seem nearly so straightforward. The collection tube would have to form a permanent (or at least while she is urinating) water-tight seal over her labia otherwise the urine would pool in the suit (or where there is gravity, run down her legs).

    10. Re:they'll come in handy... by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Que graphene filters. There was a recent article on how they pass water but nothing else.

    11. Re:they'll come in handy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Astronauts don't eat corn in fucking space. Holy shit. Am I on the right website?

  3. frosty piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    was contained in the bladder in one boot in the Apollo pressure-suit designs. I wonder what they'll do for these elastic suits.

    1. Re:frosty piss by Iskender · · Score: 2

      Come on moderators, reward the man for managing an on-topic post on with that subject!

      I'm wondering what they'll do too!

    2. Re:frosty piss by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Depends how bothered you are about contaminating the environment... The Apollo spacecraft, like most, just vented it into space. Would that be okay on the moon?

      It always seemed odd that they went to so much effort to disinfect everything that went to the moon, then contaminated it all again when the guys touched it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  4. Jewelry part of the ensemble? by schwit1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure her ear rings will be permitted.

  5. Re:Who the heck for? by ModernGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The next generation vehicles are almost ready, and we have a lot of new things in launch vehicles happening. A lot of the old Space Shuttle facilities are being refitted, and a lot of work couldn't be done until we were done using these resources on the shuttle. The time to develop a suit isn't after the vehicle is ready and it's time to start planning missions. It's good that we are pushing the next generation of suits forward. The United States is still #1 in space technology, and are the only ones working on anything really groundbreaking.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  6. Not the answer by NemoinSpace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not sure what percentage of the time the crew would need to wear these suits to prevent atrophy. I am sure it will be more than they are willing to put up with.
    We are going to have to come up with solutions on a much grander scale to change the environment, not adapt to it. It's how we humans have taken over the planet and how we will take over space. But we won't do it till we spend a lot more time on earth doing the grunt work (engineering and thinking) instead of spending billions on half baked manned missions to nowhere worthwhile.

    1. Re:Not the answer by loufoque · · Score: 2

      Use centrifugal force at the space station level to implement actual gravity.

    2. Re:Not the answer by tgd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Use centrifugal force at the space station level to implement actual gravity.

      Centripital. And the problem with that is, the structure you're standing in has the same sense of acceleration as the astronaut. It has to be dramatically stronger, and thus heavier, and therefore unworkable in orbit.

    3. Re:Not the answer by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Can you explain that in more depth? Doesn't the structure have to be strong anyway to withstand takeoff pressures from Earth?

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    4. Re:Not the answer by Fned · · Score: 1

      Centripital. And the problem with that is, the structure you're standing in has the same sense of acceleration as the astronaut. It has to be dramatically stronger, and thus heavier, and therefore unworkable in orbit.

      I was under the impression that materials science has come quite a long way since the invention of bones.

    5. Re:Not the answer by martin-boundary · · Score: 1, Insightful
      You do know the difference between centripetal and centrifugal force, right? There's only a centripetal force acting on the astronaut's feet, but there's a centrifugal force acting on his whole body.

      Centrifugal is the correct force for discussing gravity simulation.

    6. Re:Not the answer by Fned · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can you explain that in more depth? Doesn't the structure have to be strong anyway to withstand takeoff pressures from Earth?

      Only if it's launched in one piece...

    7. Re:Not the answer by martin-boundary · · Score: 0

      What's your point? If the space station is assembled in space, then the final structure will only have to be as strong as the equivalent structure on Earth would be (assuming the aim is 1 earth gravity, obviously). Are you worried about other things like pressure differential, radiation etc?

    8. Re:Not the answer by Surt · · Score: 1

      Actually, the far more likely solution is for us to adapt ourselves. Gene therapy to prevent bone loss or muscle atrophy is going to be utterly cheap compared to any solution that involves the design of the spaceship or spacesuit.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:Not the answer by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      For one, the structure is launched in segments. For another, it only has to be strong along it's major axis for launch, but for centrifugal gravity, it must be strong radially from it's axis.

    10. Re:Not the answer by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1

      If you consider times scales, I don't think that is likely at all.
      We pretty much know how to make a space wheel now. Gene manipulation to that degree is a hundred years away. My observation still stands - Humans tend to change their environment rather than adapt to it. Although I concede in 100 years that may change radically.

    11. Re:Not the answer by Surt · · Score: 1

      Well yes, it was pretty much built in to my claim that having humans in space for long enough for this to matter is at least 100 years away. I have my fingers crossed to be proved wrong on that, but I won't be holding my breath.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    12. Re:Not the answer by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But we won't do it till we spend a lot more time on earth doing the grunt work (engineering and thinking) instead of spending billions on half baked manned missions to nowhere worthwhile.

      While I agree to a point, you actually have to eventually do these things in order to see how they work.

      Consider Apollo. We didn't just fire up the ol' Saturn V and head to the Moon. You're right that there was lots of design and testing done on Earth. But eventually we flew Apollo 7 in orbit around Earth in order to test the CSM. We flew around the Moon on Apollo 8 to test those procedures (as well as beat them Rooskis to the Moon). Apollo 9 tested the LEM and the extraction procedures in Earth orbit and Apollo 10 tested them in Lunar orbit (as an aside, I have to admit that if I was on the Apollo 10 mission and everything was working out, I'd be tempted to yell "Fuck you, Neil!" into my radio and land on the Moon. What's NASA gonna do?) Not to mention the various unmanned launches before Apollo 7.

      Were all those "half-baked" missions of the Apollo program a waste? Are you saying we should have just shot astronauts at the Moon until one of them made it?

    13. Re:Not the answer by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 5, Informative

      (as an aside, I have to admit that if I was on the Apollo 10 mission and everything was working out, I'd be tempted to yell "Fuck you, Neil!" into my radio and land on the Moon. What's NASA gonna do?)

      Watch as you die on the moon because the ascent stage lacked the fuel needed to return the Lunar Module to the Command Module from the surface of the moon.

    14. Re:Not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In addition, they were collecting gravitational data needed for a clean approach -- I'm not certain, but I'm under the impression they did not process the data in real-time, so it would have been quite risky to try a landing with the old (less accurate) data.

    15. Re:Not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You do know the difference between centripetal and centrifugal force, right? There's only a centripetal force acting on the astronaut's
      feet, but there's a centrifugal force acting on his whole body.

      Pedantically, there's only a centripetal force acting on the astronaut's feet or there's a centrifugal force acting on his whole body. The former in an inertial reference frame, the latter in an accelerated (specifically, rotating with the station) frame.

      Centrifugal is the correct force for discussing gravity simulation.

      Definitely.

    16. Re:Not the answer by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Good answer--didn't know that. I assume I would have if I had been on the Apollo 10 mission.

    17. Re:Not the answer by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Do you really expect me to do coordinate substitution in my head while spinning around in an orbiting space station?

    18. Re:Not the answer by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

      Why are you assuming that the module(s) couldn't be designed to have the same orientation when deployed as when launched? Skylab did.

    19. Re:Not the answer by sjames · · Score: 1

      Because if you rotate it that way to generate pseudogravity, you'd end up with tiny floor space and really tall ceilings. Not terribly useful. Skylab had a zero-G environment, so the distinction between floor, wall, and ceiling was unimportant.

    20. Re:Not the answer by jamvger · · Score: 1

      Forces acting on the feet are transmitted to the rest of the body: we call this "standing up". This is true regardless of your frame of reference.

      Centrifugal force is a pseudoforce, i.e. a force arising from the acceleration of a non-inertial frame of reference.

      Gravity is also a pseudoforce - this is the fundamental premise of General Relativity.

    21. Re:Not the answer by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

      Because if you rotate it that way to generate pseudogravity, you'd end up with tiny floor space and really tall ceilings

      Skylab had a diameter of 24 feet, giving each "floor" a area of about 450 sq-ft. That's not huge, but it's as large as some apartments. So what if you have the equivalent of a large house spread out over 4-5 "floors"?

    22. Re:Not the answer by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      But we won't do it till we spend a lot more time on earth doing the grunt work (engineering and thinking) instead of spending billions on half baked manned missions to nowhere worthwhile.

      Grunt work in the labs and simulators is nothing but an exercise in intellectual masturbation unless and until you go out into the real world and actually see how things work. You don't learn without actually doing.

    23. Re:Not the answer by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Consider Apollo. We didn't just fire up the ol' Saturn V and head to the Moon. [Listing of pre-landing testing snipped]

      And the missions you list are just the final testing of Apollo... You also have to consider the basic research and engineering done in the Gemini program. Like the development of rendezvous techniques, flight control techniques, mission design and analysis techniques, etc... etc... Apollo gets all the glory, but a great deal of the real world (as opposed to the ivory tower of the labs and simulators) grunt work was done by Gemini.
       

      (as an aside, I have to admit that if I was on the Apollo 10 mission and everything was working out, I'd be tempted to yell "Fuck you, Neil!" into my radio and land on the Moon. What's NASA gonna do?)

      Watch as you die... The Apollo 10 LM was considerably overweight. The ascent stage was only partially fueled in order to keep the total vehicle weight within performance limits.
       
      It's also worth noting that the Apollo testing schedule was greatly compressed and accelerated due to schedule pressure.
       

      Are you saying we should have just shot astronauts at the Moon until one of them made it?

      Sadly, there's a lot of people who seem to think that unless you're 'boldly going', you're wasting money and time.

    24. Re:Not the answer by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      (as an aside, I have to admit that if I was on the Apollo 10 mission and everything was working out, I'd be tempted to yell "Fuck you, Neil!" into my radio and land on the Moon. What's NASA gonna do?) Watch as you die on the moon because the ascent stage lacked the fuel needed to return the Lunar Module to the Command Module from the surface of the moon.

      What a place to die, though.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    25. Re:Not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Current structures in orbit are *not* strong enough to stay intact under 1g. They would have to be a lot more massive than they currently are.

    26. Re:Not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the meantime, you could support life extension projects.

    27. Re:Not the answer by adavies42 · · Score: 2

      reminds me of the bit from Apollo 13 where two of them look wistfully out the window at the Moon, and the third says "Gentlemen, what are your intentions?"

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    28. Re:Not the answer by sjames · · Score: 2

      The absolute size hardly matters, it's a matter of how large is it vs how large could it have been if you did it right. As I said, it hardly mattered for Skylab because it was zero-g.

      Floors have weight too and every tiny bit counts. Besides that, there is a fairly sharp gradient when pseudo-gravity is used.

      Due to physics, it is easier for us to launch taller cylinders rather than wider ones.

    29. Re:Not the answer by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

      If you want to spin it for simulated gravity, it's a lot easier to orient it so the stress is in the direction that is already strong enough to survive launch. If that means you have several stories of small "rooms", so be it.

      You seem to be arguing that it's better to just give up on the idea rather than take advantage of the existing strength of any module launched from Earth, just because you want it to sit "sideways".

    30. Re:Not the answer by sjames · · Score: 1

      No, I argue that given our current launch capabilities and the need to conserve every ounce of weight, we're not yet at a point where it's practical to use pseudo-gravity. As I said before, floors add weight too.

    31. Re:Not the answer by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      Of course current structures in orbit aren't designed for artificial gravity. It doesn't follow that mass is the important limiting factor for structures designed to spin in space. What's really needed is a combination of tensile and compressive strength, enough for 1 earth gravity (if that's the target). Kind of like a typical rope can support a man's weight even though it is much lighter than the man himself.

      I'd imagine a ring structure built out of a network of thin wires (eg like a suspension bridge or a spider web) would do it. You could surround it by a balloon to keep the air in, etc.

  7. again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the next generation spacesuit is a reworked version of the early 1970s space mobility suit design?
    I suppose any patents must have expired.

  8. Re:Who the heck for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever. Both parties are going to talk out their asses about space while not letting NASA do anything that doesn't make them money from their contributors. This means no human space flights from home. Bipartisan bitches will blame the other party and fill the coffers of the same fucks that are killing them. Americans will still be too stupid to break from the two party system.
     
    News at 11.

  9. Less well known? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been hearing about the deleterious effects of weightlessness since I was 5, and that was before Apollo 11.

  10. Egad! It's the 1950's!!! by mark-t · · Score: 2, Funny

    A bubble helmet... I can't believe she's wearing a bubble helmet.

  11. Read about these before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had been watching some of the news and documentaries about the group doing the suits. They still had quite a few hurdles to overcome, as the squeeze suit had not been able to provide enough pressure to reach that critical 1/3rd of an atmosphere. The Article does not seem to indicate if they have tackled that, only "proven the technical feasibility", which sounds about where I heard they were last.

    When I saw them plying a big length of rubber on the leg of someone, it looked like something ready to cut off someone's circulation if left on too long. It tripped a few skeptical alarms for me. Will these have to be custom fitted? What happens if someone gains or loses weight(ie: mass)? Will using them for any length of time be uncomfortable or dangerous to people? They seem pretty happy to wander around in public wearing what appears to be a prototype. It just worries me that it might be a lot of hot air.

    The use of Gyros sounds a bit odd, perhaps I am not quite sure of the process in which bones lose density. I would have thought the loss of bone mass is from the lack of gravity bones are subjected to in the first place, not a lack of resistance to movement. Gravity pulls mostly uniformly on people, Gyros probably won't help too much for putting resistance on someone's spine or other bones in the center of one's mass. It might help some for muscle loss though. Has NASA agreed to ship some of these up to the ISS for some testing?

    Its a shame without shuttle like services we might not be able to do too much testing of the technologies we want to use to survive the trip, live on, and return from Mars. There are many that would be a great help.

    1. Re:Read about these before. by Fned · · Score: 2

      When I saw them plying a big length of rubber on the leg of someone, it looked like something ready to cut off someone's circulation if left on too long.

      I'm guessing that's because there was an additional 1 atmosphere of pressure on it...

      Will using them for any length of time be uncomfortable or dangerous to people?

      Since the point is to make them less uncomfortable and dangerous than existing suits, I'd posit that the answer will be "no, or they'll go out of business."

      The use of Gyros sounds a bit odd, perhaps I am not quite sure of the process in which bones lose density.

      Nobody is quite sure of the process by which bones lose density in microgravity. It's still kind of a mystery.

      I would have thought the loss of bone mass is from the lack of gravity bones are subjected to in the first place, not a lack of resistance to movement.

      That seems to be the case from experiments, but there hasn't been a method to provide continual resistance to movement before, just periodic exercise.

      Gyros probably won't help too much for putting resistance on someone's spine or other bones in the center of one's mass.

      It might, if the upper/lower limb gyros work opposite one another.

      Has NASA agreed to ship some of these up to the ISS for some testing?

      They'd probably want to see a fully-functional prototype first.

    2. Re:Read about these before. by Fned · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, and from the article that pic is from:

      Bio-Suit is a space activity suit under development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which as of 2006[update] consists of several lower leg prototypes. Bio-suit is custom fit to each wearer, using laser body scanning.

    3. Re:Read about these before. by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

      So, like in the anime "Rocket Girls"?

    4. Re:Read about these before. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Will these have to be custom fitted?

      Have you ever heard of a spacesuit that isn't?

    5. Re:Read about these before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, IIRC the US astronauts in the episode with the space Shuttle even mention how their conventional pressurized space suits are inferior. :)

      Also the currently airing Mouretsu Pirates has a very similar space suit type (& is also quite realistic in its space flight representation).

    6. Re:Read about these before. by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the recommendation :) I will check that anime out :)

    7. Re:Read about these before. by coofercat · · Score: 1

      Can the laser scanner work out that I've pretty much got three legs? ;-)

    8. Re:Read about these before. by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      The shuttle era suits were generic and a set was pulled from stock to fit each astronaut prior to the mission.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    9. Re:Read about these before. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I hate to be one of those "citation please" people, but where did you hear that from? That would simplify things when there's a large number of people that could end up on a mission.
      While we are writing about shuttle era suits, the best comparison I've heard between those and the upcoming "skin tight" designs that only supply air to the helmet is in an episode of the Japanese anime "Rocket Girls" which was written with the help of the JSA. There's a lot of real science in there even if it's aimed at an early teen audience and has a bit of fantasy thrown in at times. The episode was written to demonstrate the differences in EVA work between a shuttle era suit and an idealised skin tight suit and the plot was skewed to highlight the limitations of the shuttle suit. Of course one is real and the other is still in development.

    10. Re:Read about these before. by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      No problem with the citation. I heard it on several shuttle documentaries, but the official source is http://history.nasa.gov/spacesuits.pdf.

      Their reason is the same you give, a large number of people demands a need for flexibility.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
  12. About those 'roids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Outer space is a hostile environment for humans, characterized by [...] speeding micro meteoroids."

    The one scariest part of it all and the suit doesn't address it in any way.

    1. Re:About those 'roids... by Surt · · Score: 1

      It's hard to imagine how they could. Our current technology isn't close.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  13. Nonsensical outdated perceptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst things about space are 1. lack of oxygen, and 2. radiation.

    Space is not "cold". Coldness would mean that the particles move slowly. Meaning that if your own particles move fast, and there are many collisions, you will lose that movement/heat.
    But they don't. They move very fast. There are only so few of them, that on average, there is very little going on. So there simply aren't any collisions that you could lose heat to. You'd have to lose it via radiation. Which you do all the time anyway, unless clothes transform it back to heat.
    And you're vastly over-inflating the number of micro-meteoroids.

    Zero g has nothing to do with space suits. You need them on the moon as well. Zero g is more a space station problem, and the solution still is making the thing rotate (and large enough).

  14. Re:Egad! It's the 1950's!!! by Fned · · Score: 1

    It's like the 1980's all over again!

  15. Is weight really an issue by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    in low or zero g?

    1. Re:Is weight really an issue by PPH · · Score: 1

      Mass is. You've still got to push the inertia of those limbs around.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  16. Airless Vacuum by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    It isn't just for breakfast any more.

  17. airless vacuum -- wet oceans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is someone going to create a suit for a vacuum full of air? Or one for the wet oceans? Oh, wait...

  18. The barrier is too high, MAN must adapt by wisebabo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Unfortunately it looks like the human species (and maybe most multicellular animals!) is just not suited for long duration space flight and maybe even habitation of other (lesser gravity) worlds.

    http://io9.com/5881355/microgravity-screws-us-up-at-a-cellular-level

    If this turns out to be true (I know they are using fruit flies but Drosphilia are a good proxy for humans for many things) then we're going to have very serious problems in doing anything other than "plant the flag" style missions. At what point is there "enough" gravity to allow the proper development of a human fetus? Half a gravity? A third? (Mars). A sixth? (the moon). That's why probably the single most important next step for manned space flight is probably the addition of a large (capable of handling mice, preferably primates) centrifuge to the ISS. I recall that it was once meant to be part of it but was cancelled. WE NEED THESE QUESTIONS ANSWERED.

    And if the news is bad and humans can't go through a complete life cycle in anything appreciably less than one gee? Then it's time to hack the genome and (possibly) create a new species! While we're at it, we might as add ability to withstand brief (1-2 minutes?) exposure to vacuum (I understand that oxygen comes out of your blood quickly and you can't hold your breath because your lungs will burst. So you pass out in seconds). Also, radiation hardening would be good (some animals like tardigrads can take thousands of times more exposure). The ability to hibernate would be great and I'm sure there are a lot more abilities we could wish for.

    In short maybe Homo Astra (or something like that, I don't know Latin).

    Otherwise our robots will conquer the universe without us (or at least until we can download our minds into them).

    1. Re:The barrier is too high, MAN must adapt by arcsimm · · Score: 1

      In short maybe Homo Astra (or something like that, I don't know Latin).

      I'm leaning towards Abh, myself.

    2. Re:The barrier is too high, MAN must adapt by loneDreamer · · Score: 1

      If you want ideas on that, the book Endymion by Dan Simmons had that kind of human in the plot.

    3. Re:The barrier is too high, MAN must adapt by keiichi_no_hen · · Score: 1

      And I for one welcome our galactic blue elf overlords

    4. Re:The barrier is too high, MAN must adapt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's possible to put centrifuges on planetary surfaces as well as in open space. It may not turn out to be the best solution, but if we ever had reason to do so we could start putting up rotating buildings on the moon and mars, with angled floors, so that at a certain radius from the axle you experience earthlike gravity.

    5. Re:The barrier is too high, MAN must adapt by dkf · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately it looks like the human species (and maybe most multicellular animals!) is just not suited for long duration space flight and maybe even habitation of other (lesser gravity) worlds.

      The problem is, we've currently only got proper data for 1g and (effectively) 0g, and damn little for anything in between. What are the long-term effects at martian gravitation levels? Lunar? 0.1g? If the worst of the effects can be staved off by even 0.1g, we can relatively easily spin craft to achieve that. (1g is more difficult, because of the amount of mass and energy involved.) But first we need the data, as you can't extrapolate or interpolate a curve from just two datapoints...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    6. Re:The barrier is too high, MAN must adapt by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      I honestly think if the human race is going to attempt existing in microgravity, then the best way would be to evolve gradually by initially living in a 1G space station, and then for that space station to gradually reduce its rotational speed over the cource of a few centuries or even millenniums.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    7. Re:The barrier is too high, MAN must adapt by nerdass · · Score: 1

      So, some sort of cockroach grizzly bear hybrid... like a giant tardigrad.... you think we should engineer the human race to become giant tardigrads?.... to look like this? http://www.google.com.au/search?q=tardigrades&hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=TPYtT5OwGqS4iQfPxriDDw&ved=0CEcQsAQ&biw=1257&bih=621 That's one hell of a birth video for our first homo-grad. Can't wait to see that one... and then when someone says "aaaaarrrrgh kill it!" we won't be able to kill it with anything because of it's impenetrable exoskeleton and hardy resistance to every possible lethal condition we could think of. This is why you are not currently occupying any office in the space program wisebabo.

  19. Meh by goldaryn · · Score: 1

    Outer space is a hostile environment for humans, characterized by an airless vacuum, thermal extremes, ionizing radiation and speeding micro meteoroids.

    Don't go there then.

    Yes, subscriptions to my newsletter are available.

  20. ohhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please look like a sci fi comic please look like a sci fi comic ple....yessss!

  21. Evolve by v4vijayakumar · · Score: 1
    Another way is to evolve further; be sustainable to the space and and learn to fly.. Reminds me of this from a superman movie,

    "Look- they need machines to fly!"

  22. Re:Who the heck for? by TheEyes · · Score: 1

    Thankfully Obama broke us of that weird insistance we had that [b]all[/b] space travel had to be done by a single monolithic government entity; we'll have private companies resupplying the space station within two years, and low orbit tourism within the decade. In the meantime, NASA has returned to pushing the envelope of bleeding-edge space technology, rather than spending the vast majority of its budget maintaining an over-engineered, under-preforming space dump-truck that was first built in the 70s.

  23. Re:Egad! It's the 1950's!!! by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Honey, does this spacesuit make me look fat?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  24. void by znrt · · Score: 1

    airless vacuum

    wow, must be damn low on oxygen that vacuum out there!

  25. Sound like weather in Europe, at the moment . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    "Outer space is a hostile environment for humans, characterized by an airless vacuum, thermal extremes, ionizing radiation and speeding micro meteoroids."

    Space Suit Vogue Designers should look at fashion trends in Europe right now . . . how are folks there dressing to survive the hostile environment outside theirs?

    Less well-known are the dangers posed by long-term exposure to microgravity or zero-g conditions, which over time severely saps the strength of astronauts' muscles and bones.

    Sound like they just need some couch potatoes as test subjects. Again, look to Europe for volunteers. During a cold spell, people would rather sit around on their fat, hairy asses, than go outside and freeze their fat, hairy asses.

    Any volunteers to be a paid test subject? All you need to do is sit around for a long period of time, whilst wearing a new, trendy Space Suit.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  26. Space activity suit by jeti · · Score: 1

    The idea of an unpressurized space suit is not entirely new. The Space activity suit has been developed in the late 1960s and was able to prove the concept. I'm glad it's on the table again. I've seen videos showing someone wearing an SAS running on a treadmill in a big vacuum chamber. However, I can't find it on the net.

    1. Re:Space activity suit by jeti · · Score: 1

      I found a relevant video. If you want to see the suit in action, jump to the 4:00 mark.

  27. Re:Who the heck for? by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

    How did Obama have anything to do with any of that? SpaceX managed their first orbital launch in 2008 when Bush was still in office. SpaceShipOne hit space back in 2004, had been in full time development since 2001, and began initial planning way back in 1994 and the early days of Clinton. Obama was still a state legislator in 2004, and wasn't even in politics in 1994. Bush announced the cancellation of the Shuttle program, several years before Obama took office. Bush announced the replacement Ares launch system, derived from existing Shuttle parts, as a means to go to the Moon and Mars. Again, this was several years before Obama took office.

    Bush's eight years are up, Obama is voted in, and what happens? The Ares launch system is cancelled, but now we have the Shuttle Launch System, which is going to take us to Mars. It's the same god damned thing! It just has a different name, and now its Obama's space program.

  28. Re:Who the heck for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    we are brainwashed from a very young age to believe that things that come out of the enterprise of common people somehow leaks credit to the ruler in charge at the moment.

    it is all part of the ideology that sustains the state i.e. our overlords.

  29. Move your calendar forward to this year by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Meanwhile back in reality even Iran is probably less than a year away from a manned space flight (they have tested an uncrewed vehicle) while the USA has nothing apart from some tiny commercial efforts that are going to fail before they have enough funding to get anything that can make it as far as the ISS - so much for number one.
    There's nothing wrong with aiming to get back into that spot from way back in the pack but just sitting back and dreaming doesn't do it. It takes more effort than a bruised and bleeding NASA has been allowed to carry out.

    the only ones working on anything really groundbreaking

    It's a big world out there and NASA used to fund a lot of things wherever they were, and a lot of those groundbreaking things are now being funded by the countries in which they are based or other space agencies. The US military picked up the tab for some international former NASA stuff (eg. scramjet) but a lot of it has gone elsewhere.

  30. oblig xkcd by Fusselwurm · · Score: 2
  31. From the Department of Redundency Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outer space is a hostile environment for humans, characterized by an airless vacuum...

    Let me tell you about the last time I saw a non-airless vacuum...

  32. Colours by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    So long as command gets gold, science blue, and anyone the designers hate get red.

  33. Every generation starts over.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did these folks ever consider reading some of the literature in the field? No matter, nobody ever does. Everybody thinks they're smarter than all the previous generations of workers in the field.

    One might suspect, if one looked at the research in the field, that the idea of very tight spacesuits had been tried, and abandoned, for many reasons. One might suspect these include the difficulties in putting on a suit with 5 PSI of pressure per square inch, the discomforts of such a suit, issues with things like flexible joints, perspiration, and temperature control.

  34. "Spacesuit: Fashioning Apollo" and Playtex by sackbut · · Score: 1
    If anyone is interested in a good review of the difficulties and challenges of spacesuit design and why the Apollo suits were such then read this book. It is by Nicholas de de Monchaux, ISBN: 978-0262015202.

    It is a good history of the technology in 21 chapters (like the 21 layers of the Apollo suit). What most don't know is they were made by the Playtex corporation. The book is less technical than it could be but is a very good read.

  35. Weight in zero-g conditions by gshegosh · · Score: 1

    Sooo... Weight of the spacesuit is a problem in "microgravity or zero-g conditions", curious.