Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Boy Claims To Have Cat-Like Night Vision

Oswald McWeany writes "Reports swirling around the Internet are that a boy in China may have cat-like night vision. The boy with eerie blue-eyes was able to fill out a questionnaire in the dark and his eyes reflect like a cat's when a light is shined on them. No reports yet if he marks his territory or is litter box trained."

44 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blue eyes? He just uses prescience to find if the answers he's about to write down are correct, much like Paul Muad-Dib the God-Emperor did later in his life. Nothing new here

    1. Re:Blue eyes? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      The questionnaire was a Foxconn job application. He's certified to work on the low-light factory floor which is under development so the employees won't really be able to see how bad they have it. /sarcasm

    2. Re:Blue eyes? by durrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or it could be unregulated gene manipulation, this being china and all.
      Which would totally fucking awsome.

    3. Re:Blue eyes? by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wouldn't he be denied work there because he can see how bad he really has it?

    4. Re:Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agreed.

      Where do I get me some freaky blue night-vision eyes?

      First you gotta kill a few people...
      And then you get sent to a prison where they tell you you'll never see daylight again. So you dig up a doctor, pay him twenty menthol Kools to do a surgical shine job on your eyes

    5. Re:Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Paul Muad-Dib is not the God-Emperor. God Emperor was Leto II, Paul's son.

    6. Re:Blue eyes? by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or he is just using his fingers to feel the patterns of thickly printed ink on the form.

      Er, no. The obvious answer is that being cat-like, he shares their well-developed olfactory system, and hence reads by sense of smell.

      Also, he sure plays a mean pinball.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:Blue eyes? by jefe7777 · · Score: 2

      the hair on the back of my neck just stood up.

      and applauded.

    8. Re:Blue eyes? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2

      I don't think China is as bad as Slashdot claims. But if it is, they'd probably prefer to clone him so they can hire a bunch of workers that don't require them to pay the energy bill for lights.

  2. And there you were... by Sez+Zero · · Score: 5, Funny

    And there you were complaining about all the toxic waste that cheap manufacturing and lax environment laws in China.

    We could have blue-eyed sightseeing children here in the US, but, OH NO, you had to have cheap iPhones!!

  3. What are the chances? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 3, Informative

    From an evolutionary standpoint, I would think such a radical mutation impossible, unless his family has been selectively breeding for night vision for thousands of years.

    I suspect instead this is just sensationalism and the boy has moderately better vision in low light, without the reflective light collection mechanisms that exist in other animals.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    1. Re:What are the chances? by FudRucker · · Score: 2

      maybe a dormant gene went active, if they find it that would be cool if anyone could go to a doctor's office and get gene therapy and after a couple of visits to a doctor BAM! you got night vision too

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:What are the chances? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Iris closure happens in seconds. What you are experiencing is a secondry, slow method by which the eye adapts to different light levels. The concentration of rhodopsin is actually changing. Light breaks it down, but the photosensitive cells continually regenerate it - so when you're in the dark, levels build up and increase sensitivity.

    3. Re:What are the chances? by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That isn't how mutation works. There does not need to be a goal for something to happen. This could be the result of a single gene affecting the expression of many proteins, or it could be a mutation that activated some of the dormant genetic material.

    4. Re:What are the chances? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 2

      Except as the geneticist in TFA pointed out, it isn't 1 gene, its many, many.

      They all produce some change, which is why evolution takes time to produce features or turn them on (and why, say, large portions of the population don't have a mutation to produce Vitamin C). There isn't just a magic switch to turn on adaptations, regardless if our ancestors might have had a trait in the past.

      It took many generations to lose traits incrementally, and will be the same when getting them back in the same way.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    5. Re:What are the chances? by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From an evolutionary standpoint, I would think such a radical mutation impossible

      From a reading-that-statement standpoint, I would think you having more than minimal education in the biological sciences would be impossible.

      Mutations are a contributing factor to evolution, not a sole cause of it, or caused by it. There is no "evolutionary standpoint" on a single mutation occuring.

      That being said, it may be an *unlikely* mutation, but with over 7billion people, quite a few people will have rather unlikely mutations. And a single point mutation could conceivably cause a change the density of photoreceptor in the eye, how good they are at capturing photons (the human eye "sees" only about 4-5% of the photons that pass through it).

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    6. Re:What are the chances? by Phernost · · Score: 2

      Your statement is not completely correct. It is possible for a single mutation to effect multiple genes and sections of DNA. These mutations need only occurs in the dark DNA, or junk DNA whichever you prefer. Remember only about 1.5% of the human genome is protein coding exons. How many are silent genes? How many are broken? All questions needing answers.

      A programming analogy might be to say a program is DNA. Running the binutils program “stings” over that program displays all it's possible proteins. These proteins can be easily identify yet they are not the main decider of the program's functioning. On second thought, this analogy might not be that good, but it should cover the general idea.

      It is possible for a single mutation to switch on Vitamin C production, it is just highly unlikely. DNA is very good at copying, and breaking changes are "usually" filtered out. Considering current understanding any claims that such things are impossible is foolish. Claiming they are unlikely because we have not seen them before is a better way of covering your ass.

      I do believe that this child most likely just has very good low light vision. I also have that misfortune, and blue eyes, somehow those two seem connected, at least from anecdotal evidence. I have been testing and apparently have somewhere between two to three times better than normal low light vision. Sun light, direct or overcast, is unbearable, even after prolonged exposure. This child's vision is probably similar and even better, if such a thing can be considered better.

  4. Not a mutation by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Funny

    He had a surgical shine job.

    1. Re:Not a mutation by crypticedge · · Score: 2

      Menthol Kools are cigarettes, a common currency in jail

  5. Night vision by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I still have very good night vision, but as I age it's not as effective as it was when I was a teenager. I have above average visual acuity, which I think is the basis of it. Having blue eyes I can't see as being relevent or even reflecting eyes (hay, anyone ever hear of red eye?) His irises are simply able to dilate enough to let in more of the limited light available and has sensitive Rod cells.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Night vision by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Many animals have such a coating, but not all do. Some of them just have bigger eyes, bigger pupils, better night-adapted biochemistry, or some other adaptation.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Night vision by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 2

      How does the world look to people with bad vision? Blurry, mostly. More specifically, though, the most obvious change for me when I got glasses for the first time was realizing that kids draw trees with one green blob at the top for simplicity's sake. I did it because that's what they looked like.

  6. Re:not mutually exclusive by shaitand · · Score: 2

    Litter box trained is actually sort of a misnomer. You don't have to train a cat to use a litter box just show it to them. It is the preference of a cat to use a clean, pleasant smelling, dry, powdery and easily dug location for their business and the litter box is generally the best location they are going to find. Although in a pinch a potted plant will do.

  7. Can't capture on camera? by hawguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Despite the claims that his eyes have a retroreflective tapetum lucidum, they can't capture it on camera:

    http://www.lifeslittlemysteries.com/2115-china-cat-eyed-boy-night-vision.html

    In the footage, Nong's teacher claims the boy's eyes flash when shined with a flashlight in the dark, but the reporters don't seem to be able to catch the effect on camera. When Nong's eyes are illuminated in the dark, they appear normal. James Reynolds, a pediatric ophthalmologist at State University of New York in Buffalo, noted, "A video could capture [eyeshine] easily, just like in nature films of leopards at night."

    I can't seem to take a flash photo of my dog without seeing her eyes shine back at me, so I don't see why they can't capture the effect in this boy if it exists.

    I think he's just a blue-eyed chinese boy (which is unusual but not unheard of) with exceptionally good low-light vision, but I don't believe he's developed the same low-light vision adaptation that some animals have.

    1. Re:Can't capture on camera? by russotto · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, his eyes look like ordinary blue eyes to me. Seems to me his mother really pulled off a fast one on his father. "Ooh, it's a mutation, has nothing to do with my job as a tour guide for Western visitors."

    2. Re:Can't capture on camera? by eggstasy · · Score: 2

      Blue is the "true" color of the eye. Anything else implies there is some pigment - such as melanin - being produced.
      He could have simply gotten a mutation that prevents the eye from secreting melanin, and indeed blue-eyed people are supposedly more sensitive to light. They do, after all, come from those cloudy northern european countries full of pale white people.

    3. Re:Can't capture on camera? by AnonyMouseCowWard · · Score: 2

      Shouldn't the true colour be red? As with, for example, albinos, people that don't produce melanin?

    4. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Anecdotal reports in that class suggested that humans were selectively bred for lousy night vision; those whose eyes glowed in the dark were burned as witches or lynched as werewolves or whatever during the middle ages."

      No. I'm a long-time studier of that period because of all it's lunacy and a I don't recall glowing eyes being a big deal or mentioned at all, anecdote or otherwise. It was religious beliefs coupled with economics that powered the purges.

      Add to that the Middle Ages was European, and one has to wonder why the rest of the world's population of eye-glowers has disappeared?

  8. So is he color blind as well? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I know that cats aren't completely color blind, but they only have about a tenth the density of cones in their eye as a human with normal vision does, and to us, such imagery would look highly desaturated.

  9. X-Men by wiedzmin · · Score: 4, Funny

    How is there no X-Men reference anywhere in the article or the comments? Are we afraid of copyright lawsuits for uttering the brand? :)

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.
  10. has this been verified or is it bullcrap? by Karmashock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looking for some authentication here...

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:has this been verified or is it bullcrap? by bWareiWare.co.uk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is 100% verified bullcrap. The fact the voice-over SAYS his eyes glow like a cat's doesn't really cover up the fact the video shows they don't.
      How dose this stuff get on /.?

  11. Re:Nothing weird about this... by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 2

    There's this new technology called "sunglasses" that might help you.

  12. Re:not mutually exclusive by SJHillman · · Score: 2

    Most cats are trained at a very young age by their mother to use a litterbox. Although they instinctively prefer something with the qualities of a litterbox, there is some training involved in most cases.

  13. Re:not mutually exclusive by shaitand · · Score: 2

    I have a feeder for stray cats and often let them use my garage in the colder parts of winter along with a litter box. No training required and I have first hand knowledge at this point that these are cats that are on at least their third generation of being born outside and living feral.

  14. Re:Old hoax by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can't find any references to this before January 2012, although maybe the recent news flare-up has drowned the older stuff out. Here's a Snopes thread on it, nobody's calling it a hoax and these guys know their hoaxes:

    http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=78597

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  15. Re:not mutually exclusive by Gilmoure · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or a roommate's shoes.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  16. Re:not mutually exclusive by shaitand · · Score: 4, Informative

    So your stance is that mother cats who have no particular reason to prefer a litter box over the dirt in the yard (and may have never seen a litter box), teach the kittens to use a litter box... even when there is no litter box to teach them with? How do you explain that kittens acquired just after weaning also use a litter box automatically?

    Cats instinctively dislike being messy, wet, and waste odors. Just as all cats instinctively pick at food in a delicate and selective manner and in general take almost every action in a careful deliberate way unless panicked. They all have a COMPULSION to chase and stalk that is triggered by certain movement patterns. I don't know that anyone has made a deliberate study of incubating a kitten from birth and keeping it in isolation from other cats into adulthood but it seems unlikely that every cat from the first evolution of cat to modern day has passed on the exact same training in this regard. Nature is a far simpler solution in this regard than nurture and therefore all else being equal is most likely correct.

    That said, I do concede that cats definitely do teach one another even when they aren't mother cats. If you succeed in toilet training one cat in the house it will most likely teach the others. The same with using cat doors and other tricks. In some respects despite not being pack animals cats are actually quite social. I haven't seen dogs teaching one another advanced behaviors like this.

    I would even concede there are aspects of waste disposal that are likely trained. Burying behavior seems to be in my observation. Some cats bury in a deep and carefully buried hole, others just toss back a couple pawfuls of dirt. Generally these behaviors seem to be common to cats from the same litter but they aren't static. Some cats change behavior in this respect and that may be because they learn from other cats or just that they discover on their own that they prefer the results of a deep careful bury.

  17. Re:selectively breeding for night vision by Dareth · · Score: 2

    What do you call people who have been, "selectively breeding for night vision for thousands of years"?

    Ninjas!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  18. Substantive proof by twoears · · Score: 2

    that you are what you eat.

  19. Re:not mutually exclusive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I trained my male cat to piss in the toilet.

    Take a thick piece of cardboard, stick it between the bowl and the toilet seat and cut around to make it a neat fit. Then cut a circle in the center of whats left that just fits a colander, and mount the colander in the middle so it's hovering over the water in the toilet bowl. Fill the colander with kitty litter and leave it there for them to find. If they don't use it, wait a little longer than usual to change their normal litter, so it's gross and they don't want to use it. Once they get used to using the litter box built into the toilet, gradually put a little less litter in the toilet bowl each time you change it, until eventually there isn't any, but they're still going to the toilet. Then take the whole apparatus away.

    Saves on litter costs, and lets you brag about how smart your cat is.

  20. Blue-eyed sightseeing children. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure you can find those at any tourist destination. . . Disneyworld, The Smithsonian, Paris. . .

  21. Re:not mutually exclusive by dissy · · Score: 2

    In some respects despite not being pack animals cats are actually quite social. I haven't seen dogs teaching one another advanced behaviors like this.

    To add to your informative comment, I can say I have at least in one case seen this with two dogs as well, both previous pets of mine.

    I had an older lab, actually she was my step fathers originally, but became mine once he passed away.

    Now I must admit, she was a retired police dog when my step father got her, and already knew quite a few verbal and physical commands. She was quite bright for a dog.

    Unfortunately my step father did not treat her particularly well.
    I mean he loved her to death and was wonderful in playing with her and giving attention. But he basically fed her whatever he was eating. Very bad for a dog :/

    She developed diabetes, and from that further problems. She was over weight, and had a tendency to develop bed sores from inactivity.
    At one point she seemed ready to give up on life, as dogs tend to do when they know their time is near. But she was still relatively young, and had hope left.
    I exercised her as much as she would stand for, and had a very hard time adjusting her diet to something more healthy. She all but refused most dry dog food, and with her weight wanted to be lazy, which just makes the problem worse...

    Anyways, after awhile i got the idea that perhaps getting another puppy would help matters in a few ways. Both motherly instincts to kick in, as well as competing for more attention. The new dog was a pound puppy, and I got her very young, only a few weeks old.
    Low and behold, the plan actually worked! She lived another 3 years, and was a little over 10 when I had to have her put down due to a tumor growing behind her brain :{

    One of the skills she had and taught the puppy, was knowing where our yard boundary was.
    The back yard is fenced, but the front is not at all. My house also shares a front yard with the house to my south (Each of our driveways are on the far side, and other than mow lines, no distinction between them.) No sidewalk between yard and street either.

    The older dog knew where she could go, and where not to go. She knew where the mow line should be and would Not cross it without looking back at me for my OK.

    She taught the puppy the yard rules, taught her the same way to get attention to be let out back, and the puppy mostly learned the same furniture rules from the older dogs actions.

    I did teach the puppy some verbal commands, although she never had the same vocabulary as the police dog.
    Also another strange thing, when I gave the older dog hand orders, the puppy would copy them. She didn't exactly learn the hand orders, as after Brandy was put down, she never really followed them again. Instead she would look around for Brandy, I assume to copy what she was doing. I quickly stopped the few she did recognize, as it wasn't a pleasant memory for the either of us...
    But it seemed she learned to do the same action, even if only as expected from the older dog.

    But other than a tiny amount of reeducation on furniture rules when puppy grew up (after my other dog was gone), everything she learned had stayed with her through out her life.
    By reeducation, that is to say puppys on your lap on the couch is cute. Bigger dogs, not at all so much heh

    The puppy lived to a ripe age of 12, and those were two of the smartest dogs I've ever interacted with and had the pleasure of having in my life.

    So maybe not a common case, but I wanted to toss my experience out there to share.

    I gather you are more a cat person than a dog person, but in case you were curious:
    Puppy , and when older
    (Yes that was her couch! :)
    Sadly I have no digital pictures of the older retired police dog, and seems a bit much to scan one in just for this post

  22. Re:Old hoax by Dahan · · Score: 2

    I can't find any references to this before January 2012, although maybe the recent news flare-up has drowned the older stuff out.

    Or maybe it's just now made it to the English-language media. Here's an documentary from 2008 in Chinese about the kid. It turns out his night vision is a bit better than normal, but it's not that much better. The doctor says he probably has a form of ocular albinism (which is known to cause both sensitivity to bright light, and slightly improved night vision).