Slashdot Mirror


First Run of Raspberry Pi Boards To Be Completed Feb 20th

An anonymous reader writes "Raspberry Pi has confirmed the first batch of $35 PCs will be constructed on February 20. They've also coaxed Broadcom into releasing the datasheet for the board. Apparently the company hit a snag with the quartz crystal package so there was a manufacturing delay, but it's since been resolved and things are on schedule for later this month." From the announcements: "Eben and I may be going to China to make sure that the boards can be brought up properly for that date if necessary. We’ll be airfreighting them to the UK immediately, so you should be able to buy them before the end of the month."

181 comments

  1. Hot damn, it's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hot damn, it's about time. Maybe then we won't see so many Pi stories?

    I even want to buy one and I'm tired of the stories.

    1. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I predict all of the Pi stories will move from my Slashdot RSS feed to my Hackaday RSS feed.

    2. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. I thought these were supposed to be **$25**?

    3. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by ledow · · Score: 0

      One of two things will happen:

      1) "The OpenPandora Method": Where things run along the lines of (but not this isn't *exactly* what happened to the OP): There's a delay, and then another, and then there's a problem, and the price rises, and we have only limited stock, and there's a component change, and a tax we forgot to add, and the stock has sunk into the ocean, and we need more money to complete the next batch, and the guy ran off with the components, and one of them melted and we need to do a recall, and, and...

      2) The "Apple Ipad" Method: Stock turns up. Is sold out. Every time I go to buy one, the window of opportunity is about 14 and a half seconds right in the middle of the busiest part of the working day before the website crashes and Slashdotters buy up all the stock. After six months of trying to buy one, I give up.

      I'm hoping for the second - at least that gives me *some* sort of chance if I'm quick and lucky.

    4. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      Wait. I thought these were supposed to be **$25**?

      Yeah, and I thought they were coming without ethernet ports, but we were both wrong, and I'm happier for it.

      If the $25 board came out first, I'd have to buy both flavors, this way I can just get the one I really want.

    5. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by stevenvi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Read up on it for more information. This is my understanding of it:

      • The Model A (128 MB RAM, no ethernet port) is $25
      • The Model B (256 MB RAM, ethernet port) is $35

      The first run is of the Model B, as they anticipate more people are interested in that set of hardware. Their FAQ likely provides more in-depth information that what I have provided here.

    6. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Because of the lack of Ethernet, the Model A is predicted to be more of a niche board aimed mostly at schools teaching programming. The Model B is more of a mainstream board with more practical features (thus the extra $10).

    7. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by sharkytm · · Score: 1

      Or the Asus Transformer Prime Method: Where the specs are repeatedly downgraded, delays arise, specs are downgraded again, delayed again, and finally its released without several features that were promised upon release. Features that are broken are simply removed from the spec sheet.

    8. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      >

      I'm hoping for the second - at least that gives me *some* sort of chance if I'm quick and lucky.

      LOL! Having a bad day?

    9. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, my Transformer Prime has all the features from the original spec sheet that led to me placing a preorder. The only thing I know of that has changed is they removed the GPS from the spec sheet after people complained it didn't work well. Anecdotal, but the GPS on mine works great. Also, it's hard to claim it was delayed when Asus never actually gave an official release date. But assuming you go by the Dec 27th release date given by a few vendors, it was delayed one whole month.

    10. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by ledow · · Score: 1

      I thought that was called the Microsoft Windows Method.

      Still waiting on my WinFS, you know.

    11. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by na1led · · Score: 1

      Or 3) They make Millions of these boards and only sell thousands, stuck with a massive overstock, and the company goes bankrupt. I seriously doubt they will sell that many, since there are already many alternatives at low cost. If Roku can sell their box for $50 and still make a profit, the Pi can't be that big a deal.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    12. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Model A versions are $25. The model B with the ethernet and more memory are $35. Throw in taxes, shipping & packing and it's likely to be $50 or more.

    13. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Other than the GPS (which was removed from the spec, and even though it's still in there, it performs horribly for most users), what other spec was downgraded? And I'm not aware of any promised features that it was released without (though for all practical purposes, I'll accept GPS as an answer here since it's so bad it might as well not even exist). I'll grant you the GPS was a tremendous screw up on their part, but other than that you seem to be exaggerating. I'm not aware of anything else that changed.

    14. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about tucking one of those nano-sized Wifi adapters to the Model A board. :)

    15. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      I am delighted by the Model B(and will probably soon own more than I can strictly justify...); but I must confess that I find the Model A's purpose in life to be a trifle baffling(except as a sort of 'arduino murderer for non-power-constrained applications').

      If all of a school's other computer-related needs are already covered, getting together a programming environment equal or superior to a 700MHz linux box with 128 MB of RAM should be comparatively simple via LiveCD, PXE boot, VM, installing cygwin(or python for windows, or Visual Studio The First Hit is Free, Kid. Edition, or whatever).

      If a school currently has deeply inadequate computer resources, the "Well, for $25/unit(plus monitor and peripherals, and probably a USB hub if the monitor doesn't include one, because 1 USB port isn't even enough for a mouse and keyboard, let alone flash drives and whatnot) we could buy a CS education setup or, for 35$/unit(plus monitor and peripherals, and a USB hub if needed for more than mouse and keyboard) we could buy a CS education setup that can also be pressed into service for internet stuff, and accessing/saving files from the other computer lab, etc." dilemma seems trivially tilted in favor of the revision B unit.

      Even if these are designed to be a per-pupil thing, making the device more useful to its owner(and able to obtain additional tools without an existing computer and an SD cardreader, make programs that do HTTP stuff, etc.) seems like it would be worth the $10.

      The value of ethernet only gets larger if there exists, or comes to exist, a toolkit for managing/updating/backing up/etc. the things over a network. Flashing SD cards is hardly a total killer; but these things don't have to be in service too long before the ability to perform operations across all of them over the network becomes worth the upfront cost...

    16. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by sharkytm · · Score: 1

      Wifi Issues caused the initial delay, which was promised to be in early December 2011. BB and Amazon (and Asus) said it was for sale on pre-order for Dec. 8th. The total number of units shipped to cover the preorder was far far too little, and the retailers canceled quite a few of the preorders. Then we found out about the 128-bit encrypted, locked bootloader (even though Asus had talked about how much they liked the ROM community, and wanted to support.... after some pressure, Asus later "allowed" you to unlock at the expense of your warranty, which I can sort-of understand), plus the GPS being removed.

    17. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have serious doubts it's going to be $50 or over.

    18. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sole purpose of the Model A, in my opinion, is for marketing purposes. This allows them to promote the "$25 computer".

    19. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Vairon · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're only making them in batches of 10,000 so I don't think there's a risk of them over producing giving their current demand. If the number of people subscribed to the mailing list and raspberry pi forums is any indication of interest they will easily sell several 10,000 lots this year. Many people, myself included are interested in buying multiple of these devices each.

      If you compare the $50 roku to the $35 raspberry pi, the $50 roku contains no ethernet port, no usb port and no SD card. It also only support 720P instead of the 1080P the raspberry PI supports. The $35 raspberry pi has more hardware features and is $15 less expensive than the $50 roku. The $50 roku does come with a remote control and free shipping which the $35 raspberry pi does not have.

    20. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, there is a whole world of communication pariphials available well beyond ethernet. A ton of embedded projects absolutely do not require ethernet. Furthermore, a large number which do require something like ethernet will find wireless to be a far better match.

      Having said that, it certainly is a selling point to declare, "$25 computer", but that's hardly the same thing as your implication that no one wants or even needs a tiny, flexable, powerful $25 computer without ethernet.

      Hell, for $6 and wiring to the SPI interface on the Pi, you can have ethernet or bluetooth. For cheaper yet, you can have wireless communication via something like an nRF24L01P ($2.50 - $16.00; ~$25 for 1km range) module. And if you want xbee compatibility, expect to payout something like $50. Simply put, that $25 computer makes for lots of possibilities for lots of projects whereby the extra memory and ethernet interface is wasted.

      Just because all YOU have is a hammer of knowledge, doesn't mean the world is a nail.

    21. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by ledow · · Score: 1

      Have seen that - but none of it mentions the killer feature that WinFS promised (and that even the Opera browser has managed to apply to my Gigabytes of email but not one OS vendor has managed to apply to even just my "documents" filesystem in a practical way) - file tagging and database-backed storage.

      When I can do "Find all files on Project X dated last week" and have the query return as quickly as an SQL statement would execute WITHOUT needing indexing daemons, trawling over the disk, specific file organsiation, etc. to do so, then I'll consider WinFS as having arrived.

      We need to kill off "directories/folders" and move to a label/tag-based database system instead. You can do it with Gigs of spam made of tiny 1kb files - why can't you do it with my filesystem indexes?

    22. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      The $25 model apparently got wireless network, meaning it would be a more mainstream board than the ethernet board. And that is basically it.

    23. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      no.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    24. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      According to the present wiki information Model A received "Onboard Network: None".

      Neither model precludes a USB wifi dongle(and some stuff, particularly some RaLink, actually works); but it looks like the default options are either "None" or "10/100 ethernet provided by a SMSC9512 USB hub/Ethernet controller hanging off the SoC's USB master port.

      A case design allowing for a USB dongle to be installed; but protected inside the case, should be trivial enough; but is not default.

    25. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking of a "tagging" filesystem as a backburner idea, mostly toying with ideas to make it compatible with existing programs by giving it a directory structure. Say, for instance, all my files are tagged Qzukk automatically: everything I have is in /Qzukk/ then if I want to narrow it down, my music is in /Qzukk/music/, but let's say I want all the music, that would be in /music/ or from there I could get to my music in /music/Qzukk. To prevent loops, the filesystem could disallow /music/Qzukk/music/. I originally thought some logic would be in place so that subdirectories would consist only of the unique tags of the files you can see in that folder, so you can go to /music/Qzukk/europop/ but not /music/Qzukk/inbox/, but then there would be no compatible ways of making new tags and/or easily tagging files (mkdir /music/Qzukk/jpop/; mv 01-?????????.flac /music/Qzukk/jpop/). Permissions would have to be slightly rethought, a given tag could remove permissions but not add permissions, and file access would have to have all of the tags checked (since Bob's music would appear in /music/) before letting me access them.

      The biggest problem by doing it this way would be that / would have hundreds of thousands of files and every program would choke and die opening the file browser before you could select one of those subdirectory tags. Second biggest would be dealing with conflict resolution between files named the same way but tagged differently (/mail/Qzukk/mbox vs /mail/Bob/mbox) though it could be solved by showing neither unless a special tool was used to set preferred tags to handle that case, or exclude certain tags (a visibility permission could help that, in the above permission case, if /Bob/ had other user's visibility set to none, those files would not exist to me).

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    26. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      You can already get a $40 ARM computer, the Duinomite-Mega
      http://www.dontronics-shop.com/olimex-duinomite-mega.html

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    27. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by beachcoder · · Score: 1

      If everything's tagged with something, you wouldn't need a / - at least, not a / that would list files; it would list available tags I suppose.

      I don't know that conflict resolution would be an issue; you could have 'strong' and 'weak' tags - usernames and special filetypes would be 'strong' and generic things like 'music' could be weak.

      Nice view of a filesystem btw. I like it.

    28. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Or 3) They make Millions of these boards and only sell thousands, stuck with a massive overstock, and the company goes bankrupt. I seriously doubt they will sell that many, since there are already many alternatives at low cost. If Roku can sell their box for $50 and still make a profit, the Pi can't be that big a deal.

      I don't know that Roku makes a profit on selling their hardware. They have a black-box content delivery mechanism. I think most of their money comes from content sales and deals, not the hardware.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    29. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It fits in a padded mailer. Shipping to the US and packaging is 10 bucks, tops. And they are only charging VAT in Europe, so everyone else can just be tax cheats.

      Where the real pain comes in is you need a 5v supply, keyboard, mouse, and display device. You might also want a case, but you can probably just leave it in the mailer with some cutouts for the cables.

    30. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by willaien · · Score: 1

      PIC32MX795F512H processor running at 80Mhz with 128KB RAM and 512KB Flash

      So, less for more.

      (Yes, I know, different intended environments, but, still, why do you bring it up as a comparison - they're made for entirely different markets.)

    31. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is only onchip memory. Linux is so bloat that it does not run on that.

    32. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by snadrus · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I recently bought some Wireless N cards for $8. My purpose for these is server-like (Arduino-like almost) where 256mb is plenty. The $25 saves $2 and still gets N wifi.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    33. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by makomk · · Score: 2

      Also, that's not ARM, it's MIPS. Worse, it's Microchip's PIC32 version of MIPS, which uses a crippled version of gcc with optimization levels above -O1 disabled unless you buy a really expensive license from Microchip that's DRM-locked to one particular PC. I think there are also code size limitations in the free (as in beer) toolchain.

    34. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      The $50 roku does come with a remote control and free shipping which the $35 raspberry pi does not have.

      And WiFi, which is a biggie. If they produce a Raspberry Pi with integrated WiFi at the pricepoint of the roku, well, roku should be very worried. Let's say a Raspberry Pi can be produced for $50 with Wifi instead of Ethernet. For under $5 more you could add an IR receiver, a dirt cheap infrared remote (heck, or just use your favorite remote from some other device), an enclosure and wall-wart USB power supply. Now imagine if some startup or hobbyist set all that up, worked out the kinks, and sold it as a complete package online for around $70. I think they could make some pretty decent money.

      My hunch is that Raspberry Pi is going to be driving many commercial products of that sort - auto PCs, home alarm systems, you name it. I predict the day that you buy a certain consumer device from Walmart, and if you were to open up the enclosure, you'd see a Raspberry Pi running the show.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    35. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      OK, so in all of that, other than the GPS (which I already acknowledge), I see no mention of what I asked...features that had been removed or specs downgraded. I want to know what these supposed "repeatedly downgraded" and "without several features" are.

      And I hardly see a delay from Dec 8 to Dec 19 as being very notable for a preorder. Limited quantity issues after that, sure. But many people actually had these before christmas. I ordered mine from amazon on Dec 21 (after the release date) and received it by Jan 16. That's not too bad of a release backlog considering how popular these were.

    36. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by na1led · · Score: 1

      One of the main disadvantages about the Pi is where they placed the ports. If they put all ports on the back then it would be much easier to put it in devices like Stereos, etc. And with no wifi built in, that means using a usb device hanging out the side.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    37. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      I think many people have similar plans. IIRC there is only one USB port on the A though, so you'll need a hub to use both the NIC and an input device at the same time, but two on the B.

    38. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by sharkytm · · Score: 1

      The unlocked boot loader that Asus promised was removed, and replaced with an encrypted, locked boot loader. The wifi signal issues are still a problem on many units, but you are correct, they didn't downgrade the specs. And yes, the GPS is the only one that was actually downgraded/removed from the specs. They also promised a delivery date of Dec 8, actual stock wasn't delivered until Jan 8-9. Missing the Christmas gift season is a pretty big no-no in the commercial electronics industry. I was trying to be amusing... there was a lot of buzz about the delays and problems. To be honest, the Prime is a heck of a tablet, and makes me reconsider my Toshiba Thrive + 3-year-old Asus EEE netbook. I could have both in one unit if I cared to sell them both.

    39. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Zerth · · Score: 1

      The thing is the size of a business card, just make a case about the size of a paperback book and use some very short cables to put all the ports on one side.

    40. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 0

      I admit, I'm biased, but why do you view a MIPS core as a negative? It's just the core, and with the compilers available, 99% of the effort of switching between different manufacturer's parts (no matter what the core) is spent porting the peripherals. FYI, no compiler in Microchip's toolchain (8, 16, or 32 bit) has code size limitations.

    41. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by julesh · · Score: 1

      The model A still has USB, so who needs integrated ethernet? You can attach whatever you need to it that way.

    42. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by makomk · · Score: 1

      The problem with PIC32 is that all the peripheral access libraries and headers are tied to Microchip's DRM-crippled payware version of gcc for MIPS and the license agreement forbids their use with a non-crippled version of gcc, or with any version of gcc that's compiled by anyone except Microchip. Oh, and until very recently they only released toolchain binaries for Windows.

    43. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by julesh · · Score: 1

      I admit, I'm biased, but why do you view a MIPS core as a negative?

      It isn't as suited as ARM to embedded applications, mainly due to a 32-bit instruction length vs 16-bit for ARM thumb. You get much higher code density on ARM. Also, MIPS SoCs are almost universally not superscalar (whereas ARM Cortex SoCs like the one the Pi is based on are) and often lack floating point capabilities (but I believe all(?) ARM cores have integral FP).

    44. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by julesh · · Score: 1

      And with no wifi built in, that means using a usb device hanging out the side.

      I have one of these in my laptop. The thing protrudes less than a centimetre; it hardly "hangs".

    45. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by TheSync · · Score: 1

      You can already get a $40 ARM computer, the Duinomite-Mega

      No Ethernet though...

    46. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by na1led · · Score: 1

      I've never seen one that small. I wonder what kind of range it gets.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    47. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The model A saves ten bucks and will be useful in places where you just don't need all the capabilities. When coupled with a USB WiFi adapter it will make a great input or output node, for example it could be used to run displays for video signage more cheaply than anything else on earth.

      It IS a little lame to not have onboard ethernet though.

      I'd like something like this without graphics, and with GigE and SATA onboard. Hopefully we'll get one eventually.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    48. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      but it only has one USB port, add a USB hub and a USB to ethernet adaptor (or a single device that combines them) and you are right back up arround the price of the model B with a less conviniant form factor.

      The A will have it's uses but as an initial board (not a deployment board) for the tinkerers/hobbyists the B is a better fit. AIUI the point of this initial batch is to get the board into the hands of such people so any issues can be found and so a software ecosystem can form.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    49. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      People ran (and still run judging by recent traffic in #debian-arm) debian on the NSLU2 and that only had 32 megabytes of memory at least until you started soldering.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    50. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The pic32 while a high end microcontroller is still a microcontroller. The normal way of running it is without an OS with the whole application and all libraries built into one big binary. While someone did port an ancient version of BSD to it there is no way you would get a regular modern OS on the thing.

      Also it's MIPS not arm but meh on that.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    51. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by mundanetechnomancer · · Score: 1

      A small mod to a powered usb hub and you have more usb ports, and a power supply for the board. The people who are interested in this product have the rest of that stuff laying around anyway.

    52. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      While I applaud the efforts of these people in bringing more tools to the open source community, I feel that we need to direct more attention to the people making these chipsets and their accompanying documentation.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    53. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by julesh · · Score: 1

      Haven't tested it, really. Only ever use it in the same room as my router, but it works reliably there.

    54. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by DrXym · · Score: 1

      We'll see about price but I will not be surprised at all if its $50 when all said and done. $15 postage and packing from the UK to the US is almost justifiable and an easy way to rake in some extra profit.

    55. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 1

      MIPS released the R10000 core in 1995 which was their second superscalar design, and all subsequent MIPS designs have been based upon the R10000 core. Also, the M4K core that Microchip uses on the PIC32 has a 16 bit instruction word length mode (MIPS16e): http://www.mips.com/products/architectures/mips16e/ ARM's floating point is an extension to the architecture- the Cortex-A8 has a cut-down version that requires (according to the Wikipedia article) 10x more clock cycles per float operation. The utility of floating point for an embedded processor is somewhat questionable- It requires an awful lot of silicon for something that doesn't get used all that often (in embedded apps). The MIPS architecture does have floating point registers, though as I understand it, the floating point opcodes are more like macros.

    56. Re:Hot damn, it's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is wifi a biggie? You can get a wifi USB stick for £5 that works just fine on linux. It would be nice if it was included, but they are building to a very tight budget and given the ease of adding USB wifi, it just wasn't important enough to squeeze in, but maybe it will show up in a future version. Remember you aren't the target audience, this is aimed at education, fortunately the Raspberry Pi are happy to work with and sell to geeks and hackers since they hope it will develop a community that create things useful for their primary goal, but hackers and geeks (and people who want to build HTPCs) aren't their primary target.

  2. What about shipping directly from China? by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For Asian markets, why dont they ship directly from China instead of moving them to UK first and then shipping them to their destinations
    Infact, for all non EU destinations wont it make more sense to ship directly from China?
    Will avoid multiple customs duties as well. (no customs will need to be paid for the UK entry)

    1. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by Dave+Whiteside · · Score: 2

      Liz has posted that "There’s actually a little more to the logistics than I’m able to tell you about at the moment, because we’re still in negotiations. You’re right, we’re not being quite as blunt-instrument about it as you think." so there may be some other shipping systems in place shortly after the 20th ... but we'll see

      --
      who where what when now?
    2. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      It sounds like they're planning on moving that way eventually, but it takes time to negotiate, etc when dealing with many different nations. From the official FAQ:

      Will the device be available internationally?
      We intend to ship worldwide from launch. We may establish a distribution network in due course.

      How much will it cost to ship to [country X]?
      We don’t know yet; we’re still negotiating about logistics. The people we’re talking to have local distribution points all over the world, so you can have your Raspberry Pi shipped from somewhere closer than the UK.

    3. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      wont it make more sense to ship directly from China?
      Will avoid multiple customs duties as well. (no customs will need to be paid for the UK entry)

      Alec Guinness voiceover: The customs laws are more complex than you can possibly imagine.

    4. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by stevenvi · · Score: 2

      That would involve setting up distribution channels in China. This is pure conjecture, but I would imagine that it would cost more in the end. Think about the consumer electronic devices you own. How many were made in China? How many were shipped to you directly from China?

    5. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by Builder · · Score: 2

      For a small company, why don't you setup multiple distribution channels and regional based logistics ?

    6. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      How many were made in China? How many were shipped to you directly from China?

      Well, most were made in China/Thailand/Malaysia and shipped from those countries to local warehouses here in India
      From there they were shipped/moved to my home

    7. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by Fallingwater · · Score: 1

      Think about the consumer electronic devices you own. How many were made in China? How many were shipped to you directly from China?

      Since I discovered DealExtreme (and the like), a whole lot of them.
      The Pi people could reach some sort of agreement with DX or some other HK-based (and not China-based - Chinese postal services are awful) site of that kind to distribute worldwide.

    8. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I've been looking forward to it, where can I buy it in the US? Will I have to get it delivered, or will they be in stores?

    9. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      raspberrypi.com

      That is the only place they will be sold in the foreseeable future.

    10. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      We don’t know yet; we’re still negotiating about logistics. The people we’re talking to have local distribution points all over the world, so you can have your Raspberry Pi shipped from somewhere closer than the UK.

      This is a fancy way of saying "We've got an account manager with a well-known international courier such as UPS, and we're negotiating terms with them.".

    11. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      The problem with DX is that it's painfully slow to get a delivery. Oh they have lots of neat stuff, but it takes over a month for a delivery to NY...

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    12. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > will they be in stores?

      Yes, as soon as they can find stores who are prepared to sell them with a margin of precisely $0.

      Seriously, why would you want to buy a cheap computer from a store? The excellent pre-sales Linux demonstration, or the after-sales support where they diagnose how precisely your modifications to the distro on the SD card and the cheap usb wifi card you got for $2 off eBay aren't working properly together if you connect to your cheap wifi router on channel 4?

    13. Re:What about shipping directly from China? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Seriously, why would you want to buy a cheap computer from a store?

      Convinience. Getting stuff shipped is a PITA; deliveries are always when I'm at work. I wind up driving to the UPS place or post office to pick the package up. Rather than log onto a usually poorly designed web site or call a phone number, give CC or bank routing info, then waiting a week or two, then findong an "attempt to deliver" note and driving farther than the stors is, I'd rather drive to the store, pick up the item, write a check, and be done with it. Mail order has always been a hassle, I only use it when necessary, like buying a motherboard or Raspberry Pi or other item that isn't available locally. If I can get it in town, I'll get it in town.

  3. Not constructed - Completed by The+Jynx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Raspberry Pi has confirmed the first batch of $35 PCs will be constructed on February 20

    To save any ambiguity, the actual release says:

    The good news is that this finally means we have a date for the first batch: the boards will be finished on February 20

    1. Re:Not constructed - Completed by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      So is anyone going to be creating some sort of box for these or will we be getting a bare board?

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    2. Re:Not constructed - Completed by Zerth · · Score: 1

      The foundation isn't going to have an official case until they are ready to put them in schools(later this year), so just bare boards for now.

      Several individuals have designed papercraft, CNC'd, or 3d printed cases. At least one of the 3d printed cases has been put up on Thingiverse or Shapeways.

      Others will just use the shipping packaging it comes in.

  4. Re:Who cares? by ledow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Troll, but:

    Don't have a TomTom then?
    Or one of the thousands of set-top boxes that use it?
    Don't have a TV from a big-name manufacturer (e.g. Sony to name one) with media capabilities?
    Don't have a Kindle?
    Don't have an Android phone?

    Seems to me that Sony, Kindle, Android, TomTom are all big-names and all in the consumer market where almost everyone has at least one themselves, or certainly know someone with one. That's without even trying to dig for more information, too.

    P.S. How's Windows Phone coming along?

  5. Re:Who cares? by SJHillman · · Score: 2

    It doesn't ship with Linux. Or any other operating system. You can buy an SD card with Linux pre-installed, but that's a separate purchase.

    We appreciate your prediction that it has a good chance of succeeding.

  6. broadcom soc by vlm · · Score: 1

    Anyone read the broadcom SOC doc in detail? I won't lie and claim I read the whole two hundred pages in detail but I did page thru it. Has anyone found any reason why it was secret? Superficially I've found nothing shocking or amazing. Sometimes there is something "new" which is cool and amazing. Think back to the first time you wrote a 16550 driver. The funniest thing I've found so far is a little example on page 11 where a 250 meg clock with a too-small implementation divider means you literally cannot run 300 baud RS232 with this dude. I liked reading about the GPIO system and the clocks that can drive them and spent at least 15 seconds thinking about how to drive a RC servo in hardware (not synthesizing level transitions in software, perhaps in an interrupt routine, but completely in hardware). I did something like that with a 68hc11 (I think?) back in the early 90s. The "real UART" vs the "mini UART" is kind of interesting/weird/worth looking at.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:broadcom soc by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Has anyone found any reason why it was secret?

      Complete speculation here, but hey, it's Slashdot: it's easy to say "There might be some important proprietary data somewhere in that 200 page technical document, best be safe and keep it private.", much harder to commit to "This is completely devoid of private information, let's make it public.". Couple this with the fact that, in normal situations, there's almost no demand for data like this from the general public (even among the techie crowd we get here, it's a niche) and you see why the data isn't released. Now in this case it's the core of a somewhat novel, hackable, as-open-as-reasonably-practicable design, so there is a relatively sizeable demand for the data - Broadcom saw this, put in the effort, and released it. Pretty good of them, if you ask me.

    2. Re:broadcom soc by blacksmith · · Score: 2

      There's a fair amount that's been removed from this datasheet from the full BCM2835 one - all the parts that aren't accessible from the ARM have been taken out. It wasn't that these bits were secret per se, but that it took effort to produce the edited version.

    3. Re:broadcom soc by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Has anyone found any reason why it was secret?

      This is a very competitive space, and Broadcom does not want a competitor to find a weakness in their product or duplicate a feature that other SOCs do not currently have (which may have been the reason this chip was used for the rasberry pi in the first place).

      That said, I find it somewhat disappointing that an open source project is dependent on a chip that is not able to/does not release complete specifications. But at least (apparently) the important parts of the datasheet were released.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:broadcom soc by BiggerBadderBen · · Score: 0

      I've worked with a lot of chip companies over the years, and Broadcom is one of the worst when it comes to availability of collateral like datasheets and programmer manuals. To have access to anything beyond a marketing summary requires an NDA, and even then you only have access to a tiny list of things through one of the worst portals you've ever seen. As you've noted, there quite often isn't anything remarkable, but for some reason they feel it's important to lock it down. Contrast with a company like Freescale that makes all of their SoC datasheets available to anyone with a browser.

    5. Re:broadcom soc by vlm · · Score: 1

      Yeah that was exactly my point, I was not shocked by what I read. Oh look, it has a very-nearly 16550-compatible UART, be still my shuddering heart.

      Supermarkets are a competitive marketplace too ... but a fairly bland commodity does not need to be kept secret. The grocery market business is pretty cutthroat, but you don't need to make it a secret that the 3 pound bag of gala apples contains gala apples, just need to sell it cheap and good condition.

      Now if the chip had something utterly unexpected, like a hardware PID temperature controller for a makerbot extruder, that would be weird and worth keeping quiet until wide scale release. Or had weird embedded DRM. Or a new design for a hardware AES encryption onboard. But the SoC seems pretty standard and pedestrian at first glance... anyone find something interesting, unexpected, in there yet?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:broadcom soc by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      My understanding is that anybody who obtains the full version of all Broadcom datasheets, unless placed under an NDA of Greater Warding, will have everything he needs to discover their CEO's true name(in The Old Tongue) by which he can be banished forever from the temporal plane.

      Understandably, he is kind of touchy about that.

    7. Re:broadcom soc by citizenr · · Score: 2

      >Has anyone found any reason why it was secret?

      It still is. Whole thing is a GPU/FPGA with glued in ARM core. They released all the ARM details, but omitted everything about GPU/FPGA.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    8. Re:broadcom soc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's an abridged datasheet. The real one is over 600 pages long. I work for Broadcomand have read most of it. I haven't downloadad the public one but I would guess it's missing almost everything on the VideoCore IV.

    9. Re:broadcom soc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't an open hardware project, it is an education project that just happens to use open source software to further its goals. They will be releasing the gerbers and BOM eventually, but only in hopes that some chinese manufacturer will rip them off and mass produce it(since you can't even buy the chip in small quantities).

      The RPi foundation wants a device to revitalize UK computer education. While they'd like to help out the electrical engineering side, that is not their focus, which is why they picked a chip that was cheap, capable, but not open, instead of doing something like the Arduino(cheap, open, limited) or the Beagle Board(open, capable, but not cheap).

      They made the best choice for their goals, not the best choice for you.

    10. Re:broadcom soc by Animats · · Score: 1

      The funniest thing I've found so far is a little example on page 11 where a 250 meg clock with a too-small implementation divider means you literally cannot run 300 baud RS232 with this dude.

      As one of the people who needs 45 baud (I restore Teletype machines from the 1920s and 1930s) this is mildly annoying. It's also irksome that in Linux, you specify one of a set of standard named constants for well known speeds. In Windows, you specify a baud rate to the driver as an integer, which allows nonstandard baud rates UNIX was built for the PDP-11, which had a serial device with 14 fixed baud rates (16 with an external clock.) DOS was designed for the IBM PC, which used an 8250 UART, of which the 16550 is a successor, and could be set to any baud rate in its range by setting the divisor. That distinction persists three decades later in Linux and Windows 7.

    11. Re:broadcom soc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an abridged datasheet. The real one is over 600 pages long. I work for Broadcomand have read most of it. I haven't downloadad the public one but I would guess it's missing almost everything on the VideoCore IV.

      Dude, wikileaks is over *that* way..

    12. Re:broadcom soc by eclectro · · Score: 1

      They made the best choice for their goals, not the best choice for you.

      The reason they pushed broadcom to release the datasheet is that they recognized that their goals of widespread adoption which is a goal that I understand partly hinges on an open architecture that is accessible and documented. Otherwise software can not be programmed or hardware won't be extended. Indeed, that is part of the reasoning behind the GPL (no matter what you think about that).

      Otherwise, they might be as well be a commercial enterprise - which to this point has not been able to put forth any similar product.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    13. Re:broadcom soc by eclectro · · Score: 1

      but a fairly bland commodity does not need to be kept secret.

      Most of it is probably mid level managers implying there is something special so they have an easier time justifying their jobs.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    14. Re:broadcom soc by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      Broadcom keeps their datasheets so locked down that you have to sign an NDA to get anything, generally. This release comes as a bit of a surprise.

      This is good news, but in retrospect, this seems backwards. If you want to grow an ecosystem, you need spec sheets. Did they choose Broadcom for the RPi design without any assurances that the datasheet would get opened up? Was this agreed upon from the beginning, and it's taken Broadcom this long to redact the datasheet? Or did Broadcom have a change of heart when they saw how popular the project became?

    15. Re:broadcom soc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for what the RPi is designed for. All the GPIOs brought out already have standard linux file interfaces, all the GL libraries are standard with binary blob drivers, several languages are already ported, although compiling takes several minutes for anything small and the kernel is better off crosscompiled on something else.

      If you want to teach kids to program, use this as an Arduino replacement, or make a home theater system/file server/low end desktop PC, everything has been already covered.

      The datasheet wasn't intended to be released(it's missing nearly twice as many pages as they released) and is just to shut up those who insist they want to write their own OS or plan to desolder the BGA and make their own board.

    16. Re:broadcom soc by Nethead · · Score: 1

      When you said 16550 driver I was reminded of the VIC-20 where MOS couldn't produce 6551s in time so they software emulated it on the 6522 (and 6526 on the C64.) It could burst up to 1200 baud but 600 baud was it's sustained max. I remember friends an I "turbo" speeding our 300 baud modems to 600 baud on clean lines.

      The 68hc11 was a cool chip. I loved the "upper register" of extra op codes. I built myself a nice little FORTH platform way back in the day with it.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    17. Re:broadcom soc by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The makers of "mobile phone SOCs" are pretty secretive about their GPUs. I think there are two reasons for this, firstly to keep information out of competitors hands. Secondly to prevent the "mobile phone SOCs" from competiting with more expensive "ARM+DSP SOCs" intended for general processing applicaitons.

      When running a company that makes such chips you essentially have two choices

      1: don't release anything to those who haven't signed an NDA
      2: go through your documentation and carefully separate the bits that you can tell the public about and the bits you are keeping

      The question is whether the mindshare that can be bought though releasing a redacted datasheet is worth the cost and risk (that they left in some information they were trying to keep secret) of doing so. Afaict broadcom think that in the general case the answer is no but in the specific case of the Pi they have been persuaded to make an exception.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    18. Re:broadcom soc by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Afaict they chose broadcom because at least one of the project founders had a job there and was able to use that job to get a sweetheart deal on SOC pricing (large volume pricing even for relatively small volume orders). That was what made a proper linux computer at such a low pricepoint possible without risking an unrealistic ammount of capital (noone really knows to what extent this will succeed yet).

      This datasheet is nice to have but it's not vital. Exact details on what the IO lines can and cannot do is pretty tangetical to the PIs main purpose. Details of the video core are still secret but afaict that is the case with all the "mobile phone SOCs"

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    19. Re:broadcom soc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the above.

      And as an aside, there would be little point in having a GPU datasheet. You can't really write code for it without a lot of experience (and the custom compiler etc). There's hundred on man years of work in the binary blob already. Just bunging out the datasheet doesn't help anyone write write a new one.

      The only useful thing missing from the datasheet is the message passing information used in getting data from the Arm to the GPU, and even that is pretty much covered by the libraries supplied anyway i.e. You use the libraries, you get access to the GPU - and those libraries are pretty good already so people are very unlikely to be able to write anything better.

    20. Re:broadcom soc by sjames · · Score: 1

      I have never found anything in any datasheet, NDA or public that actually warranted secrecy. Anything in them they might not want their competition to know could be discovered by buying a publicly available product containing it and performing a bit of reverse engineering. It's a level of effort that's worthwhile for an unscrupulous competitor but often not for the people that might genuinely add value to the product by supporting it.

      Just another example of self-defeating paranoia.

    21. Re:broadcom soc by sjames · · Score: 1

      This is a very competitive space, and Broadcom does not want a competitor to find a weakness in their product or duplicate a feature that other SOCs do not currently have (which may have been the reason this chip was used for the rasberry pi in the first place).

      Any competitor that wants to do that can just buy any product featuring the chip and have it completely reverse engineered in no time flat.

  7. You just described by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Why prices below market equilibrium rates always lead to shortages.
     

    --
    Deleted
  8. Are they going to make cases? by na1led · · Score: 1

    This sounds great for some enthusiasts, but to use this as your primary STB with no case (just bare board) sitting on my cabinet, come on.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:Are they going to make cases? by Dave+Whiteside · · Score: 1

      yes they are going to make cases but not for the first batch or so

      --
      who where what when now?
    2. Re:Are they going to make cases? by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Break out your Legos and make a case.

    3. Re:Are they going to make cases? by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

      That's why multiple groups, including the Foundation itself, plan to manufacture cases. Isn't that wonderful? (Cases will not be available from the Foundation at launch.)

    4. Re:Are they going to make cases? by vlm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      .. with no case (just bare board)...

      I made a quick check and if you have a replicator or access to one or a friend with one, thingiverse seems to be flooded with different case designs for the pi. I would not be surprised if a replicator owner would squirt one out for you in exchange for a six pack.

      I have noticed over the years that /. is stereotypically wimpy about basic handyman skills... Buy a box at radio shack or home depot electronics dept and drill a couple holes in it, no problemo...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:Are they going to make cases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Already some great cases proposed here

      http://www.raspberrypiforums.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=9

    6. Re:Are they going to make cases? by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

      Until you can buy or print a tailored case made for this device, note that a Penguins or Altoids tin appears to be a perfect fit (after cutting holes for the ports that stick out).

    7. Re:Are they going to make cases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gaffer tape it to the back of your TV.

    8. Re:Are they going to make cases? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Case? Where we're going, we don't need cases...

      If you have a monitor with built-in speakers, and a built-in USB hub, that is all you need.
      Plug the Pi into the USB hub as both master (to control USB) and slave (to suckle power from the USB hub). Plug Ethernet into the Pi. Plug wireless keyboard/mouse dongle into the USB hub. Add one HDMI cable to the monitor.

      Then, use *** DOUBLE SIDED FOAM TAPE ** to attach the Pi to the back of the monitor. Simple, elegant computer. If you tidy up the cables in the back, then the only cables you see are monitor power and ethernet. That is nice for the price.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    9. Re:Are they going to make cases? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      a case is in the works

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    10. Re:Are they going to make cases? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Sorry, no. According to the FAQ, it won't fit in an Altoids tin because of the rounded corners.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    11. Re:Are they going to make cases? by chispito · · Score: 1

      I have noticed over the years that /. is stereotypically wimpy about basic handyman skills... Buy a box at radio shack or home depot electronics dept and drill a couple holes in it, no problemo...

      Use a cardboard box.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    12. Re:Are they going to make cases? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The fact that it has no case and is so small is, IMO, its best feature. You can have it in any form factor you want. Add a hard drive, a couple of tuner cards, stick it in an old VCR you've ripped the guts from, and you have a home made DVR that says VCR on it. Gees, so many uses for this thing. How about an "FM" radio that will pick up almost every station in the world? Put it in an old stereo. The possibilities are endless.

      Um, you're not a hardware hacker, are you? I haven't done this kind of thing since I was a teenager, looking forward to getting my hands dirty again. Hmm, I'd better get a soldering iron...

    13. Re:Are they going to make cases? by Hatta · · Score: 2

      I have noticed over the years that /. is stereotypically wimpy about basic handyman skills...

      The funny part is, in the last Raspberry Pi story about 2/3 of the comments were complaints that you couldn't get the SMD and BGA parts as a kit to hand solder.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:Are they going to make cases? by idontgno · · Score: 2

      because of the rounded corners.

      Wait, what?

      When did this turn into an Apple design patent issue?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    15. Re:Are they going to make cases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a monitor with built-in speakers

      And an HDMI input. Not too many of those in my office, nor my home. /me counts

      Actually, none. I suppose one could spend another $35 to buy an HDMI to VGA convertor...

    16. Re:Are they going to make cases? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      It's not really intended to be a STB (it can be used as one but that's not it's primary purpose)

      In time there will be an official case because one is needed for school deployments to placate H&S and reduce the risk of damage but it's not a priority right now.

      There are a number of third party case designs but I doubt any of the third party case designers is prepared to put up the upfront money needed to get low per-unit costs.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  9. sheepish question by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Apparently the company hit a snag with the quartz crystal package

    What does the quartz crystal do? Is it like the crystal radio I made when I was 9? Does the Pi do wi-fi via a cat's whisker? Or does the quartz crystal control the clock like my dad's wristwatch? Or is it a "healing crystal" for absorbing the dangerous electromagnetic radiation that the Pi almost certainly emits. Wait, it says the "quartz crystal package". Does the Pi come embedded in a crystal???

    Please excuse me for not being geek enough to know this already. I had no idea that computer boards had quartz crystals on them.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:sheepish question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The clock oscillator on pretty much every board is based on a quartz crystal oscillator. (or, maybe, a silicon ring resonator, but my money's on a regular XO of some sort).

      They're available in a myriad of sizes and configurations and while there's some basic standards, there are variations among mfrs, not so much in the pad layout, but in things like how far the weld on the can sticks out, and so forth.

    2. Re:sheepish question by chill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Quoting user shirro from the Raspberry Pi comments:

      Quartz crystals provide a clock signal that regulates all the other components. They utilize the mechanical resonance of the crystal to produce a stable electrical oscillator. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_oscillator

      Digital circuits such as microprocessors have delays in processing and moving data about and a clock is required to regulate the system so that data is not read before it is available. Different parts move at different speeds and the master clock is divided down to appropriate rates for each component of the system.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:sheepish question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or does the quartz crystal control the clock like my dad's wristwatch?

      This one.

      Nearly all digital circuits have crystals on them. Digital logic has to be "clocked" so that all of the gates in the circuit work together in lockstep. When you hear When you hear about a processor that runs at X megahertz, a crystal is what generates that frequency. (Or more likely, some multiple/divisor of it.) There are other ways to generate a main clock signal, but quartz crystals are most common because they are extremely stable, reliable, and cheap.

      The "crystal" in a crystal radio refers to the diode (or cat's whisker, if you're a real geezer), and is not the same as a crystal in an oscillator.

    4. Re:sheepish question by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=quartz+die
      quartz is used as spacers in chip packaging.

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    5. Re:sheepish question by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Informative

      Quartz crystals for geeks 101:

      Quartz crystals are the basis of reliable, relatively frequency stable oscillators. They are at the heart of most every computer system of any size or complexity (yes, some use RC oscillators, others use more exotic stuff, but, we're talking the 99% here...)

      Without a reliable time source, you cannot do asynchronous serial communications and any number of other things that require your computer to have the same sense of time as another computer it is attempting to talk to.

      These same crystals are also at the frequency basis for many radio systems for similar reasons, except in the radio realm the crystals can be used to control the radio frequency for transmitters and receivers to lock to each other without much tuning fuss.

      Extra geek points if you remember the crystal color combinations to make Sleestak repellent noise (from Land of the Lost).

    6. Re:sheepish question by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I had no idea that quartz crystals are still used for time keeping on computer chipsets. Thanks for the education, all. I figured that by now it would all be silicon.

      I feel warmer toward my equipment knowing this.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:sheepish question by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      ...if you're a real geezer

      You ain't gonna meet a realer geezer than me, boyee.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:sheepish question by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Any time you see a CPU speed listed for a computer, you're actually seeing information about a quartz crystal. For example, the Raspberry Pi has a 700 MHz processor, which really means that there's a stable clock source timed to oscillate 700 million times per second. At the core of this clock source is a quartz crystal to serve as a time reference.

      It's rare to see the oscillation frequency of a crystal to be used directly as a clock frequency nowadays, so don't assume that the crystal in the RP is 700 MHz.

      There's already plenty of replies to explain this, but I thought I'd add my thoughts anyway.

    9. Re:sheepish question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quartz AKA Silicon dioxide

    10. Re:sheepish question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gawd, Google and Wikipedia for the questions that make you lose Nerd cred!

    11. Re:sheepish question by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Quartz AKA Silicon dioxide

      Oh yeah... I knew that.

      I guess it's something I didn't think much about. I still like the idea of Wi-Fi via cat's whisker.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:sheepish question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just fyi, quartz is silicon. or rather, a silicate.

  10. Troll on bro by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

    But here's the wiki link anyway: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_oscillator

    1. Re:Troll on bro by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't know who you're talking to.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  11. As much as I want one... by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    I'd love to have one with more than 128 or 256MB ram. I wonder if the Broadcom SOC design allows for piggybacking a larger chip on top? I'm sure a model B with 1GB of RAM wouldn't be out of the question at a price point of $50. I realize we're just going more and more "I want" in price but I think it would be nice to have that extra headroom

    1. Re:As much as I want one... by Digicrat · · Score: 1

      I'd love to have one with more than 128 or 256MB ram. I wonder if the Broadcom SOC design allows for piggybacking a larger chip on top?
      I'm sure a model B with 1GB of RAM wouldn't be out of the question at a price point of $50. I realize we're just going more and more "I want" in price but I think it would be nice to have that extra headroom

      +1

      Even 512MB RAM would be better. I still plan on getting (at least) one, but more RAM + MPEG-2 support would make its usage as an HD MythFrontend a lot more practical.

    2. Re:As much as I want one... by psergiu · · Score: 1

      According to the foundation, the largest available PoP RAM chip of the required physical size manufactured at the time is 512Mb, it costs way more than twice of the price of the 256Mb one and is not yet available in the required volumes.
      You'll have to wait for Rev.C & D boards ...

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  12. Re:Who cares? by Dave+Whiteside · · Score: 1

    or you can download an image from the foundation
    or is that the empire and foundation
    where's azimov when you need him.

    --
    who where what when now?
  13. Re:Who cares? by chill · · Score: 1

    where's azimov when you need him.

    The same place he's been since April 1992, dust in the wind. After his death his body was cremated and his ashes were not interred.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  14. Biggest Issue is Supported Codecs by Kagato · · Score: 2

    It's not quite the Apple TV, Boxee or Roku killer... yet. While the SoC supports a fair number of codecs, only a small number are licensed at this point (see the Pi FAQ), and if you have hopes for Flash and Silverlight based streaming services (Netflix, Hulu, etc.) , that's not going to happen unless Chrome or Firefox release a browser with embedded support.

    1. Re:Biggest Issue is Supported Codecs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only have hopes for WebM and Theora support, and any future unlicensed codecs, so this is a non-issue.

    2. Re:Biggest Issue is Supported Codecs by CaptainLard · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Thankfully, this will NEVER be a ____ killer! For once we don't have to worry about losing development support when X device fails to achieve 25% market share by Q3. Thankfully, the PI is produced by a non-profit so no hedge fund manager can pull the plug when the projected growth rate increase drops below 50% or whatever they do in their volcano fortresses (I kid I kid).

      ...if you have hopes for Flash and Silverlight based streaming services...

      How much widget-ry (advertising sources) do you even need? I have hopes that Raspberry Pi will accomplish their mission of letting whoever wants to program, learn how to program. In my opinion, the smarter the human race, the better. /naivedreams. And the best part about all of this is, if you do care enough about Hulu etc, you can just take chromium and adapt it to the PI or wait till it runs android apps, etc. I think the biggest issue is getting these things out to the people that want them.

    3. Re:Biggest Issue is Supported Codecs by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      For once we don't have to worry about losing development support when X device fails to achieve 25% market share by Q3. Thankfully, the PI is produced by a non-profit so no hedge fund manager can pull the plug when the projected growth rate increase drops below 50% or whatever they do in their volcano fortresses

      So, in a few years, when this unit is obsolescent, or in a few years further when it's obsolete... It'll be a good thing? And you expect them to keep producing it, even as the costs of sourcing the now [obsolete|obsolescent] components rises dramatically?

    4. Re:Biggest Issue is Supported Codecs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they continue to use obsolete components? Just upgrade to the next Arm SoC - Linux hides all the differences behind drivers and libraries. At worst, recompile your code.

  15. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    P.S. How's Windows Phone coming along?
     
    I don't know by my iPhone is kicking my Droids ass. Not that Android is really open source anyway.

  16. Incomplete. by eddy · · Score: 2

    The "VideoCore IV" (aka BCM2763) is hardly mentioned, so the answer is that this document doesn't include the interesting parts. When they say it could be used to port a new OS to the chip, that port wouldn't include any interesting [accelerated] video output.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  17. Meh. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or has all the hype caused anyone else to just wait for the 2nd gen?

    1. Re:Meh. by chispito · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or has all the hype caused anyone else to just wait for the 2nd gen?

      I wouldn't hold your breath. There are maybe two things I could see them adding: built-in WiFi and more RAM. For wifi, you can simply use USB, and likely make it cheaper than a chip/antenna they could build in. For RAM, it's apparently not cost effective to go to 512MB at this point:

      http://sdr-radio.com/http://www.raspberrypi.org/forum/general-discussion/how-much-ram-does-the-bcm2835-support

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re:Meh. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      $35 is cheap enough that I can both try it now and wait and see later.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    3. Re:Meh. by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Considering the low-cost target, I doubt many features will be added. Most improvements will simply be implemented via USB or extension boards anyway.

      That said, here's my wish list of 2nd generation improvements, which are mostly just incremental improvements and rely heavily on Broadcom:

      1) More RAM
      2) Upgraded CPU speed (a given, really)
      3) More hardware decoding options for video, audio, etc.
      4) Even smaller form factor

      And although these could technically be done as an external extension, I would like to see these features built-in for convenience:
      5) Wi-fi (For the Model A especially)
      6) Optional power-over-ethernet (Model B only, of course)
      7) Optional battery power (on-board power management IC and a simple connector would be enough)

      Every other feature I can think of can be done as an external board or USB. That said, I would imagine that if somebody made a feature that lots of people use and want, you might see it integrated onto the 2nd gen Raspberry Pi.

    4. Re:Meh. by chispito · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I wonder how difficult it would be to splice in your own POE? Also, I wonder if the board could handle irregularities due to line length?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    5. Re:Meh. by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Well, splicers already exist. You just need to convert the plug to micro-USB. However, these things cost $25 by themselves!

      So, I've been thinking of building my own. Stepping down the voltage (from 44-57 V to 5 V) is the easy part. The hard part is negotiating the power you're about to draw.

      Fortunately, you can get the appropriate controller from Digikey for about a buck.

      So, to make your own, you'd need the PoE-PD interface, a DC-converter, two RJ-45 port and one USB port to plug everything in, a dozen or so external components (capacitors, inductors, diodes, etc), and a PCB board to tie it all together. Just using mini-USB is cheaper, of course, but building your own splitter isn't out of the question.

      All in all, this would add a couple bucks to the price of a Raspberry Pi (but model B only) and take up board space at the same time, so I can see why they didn't do this for the first generation.

    6. Re:Meh. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I'd add another, armv7 instruction set support.

      Afaict the arm core in the pi is only armv6 and this serverely limits your choice of linux distros. For example the new hardfloat port of debian is armv7 or higher only.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  18. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your missing many facts. on the other hand, if your travelling and your phone requires an update how do you do it ? my android does not lock itself if it wants an update, oh and jobs has passed on, its not a real apple anymore.

    (troll) LOOOG!!!!!@

    btw stop being negative, each user has (gender applicable here) own preferance, apple android, who cares. ps3 xbox who cares. its all about the money in the end. hey do you like green money or money? most people will say money. cause they don't care what color it is as long as its MONEY!

    I say support the devs, not the companys, they make enough CASH MONEY from the media deals. (thats right coke and pepsi i'm looking at you.)

  19. software defined radio runs on rasberry pi by FudRucker · · Score: 2
    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:software defined radio runs on rasberry pi by drwho · · Score: 1

      yes, and SDR is good, but I'd like one that is a TRX, and is cheaper. Perhaps a digital radio operating in MW low HF only (to save costs).

    2. Re:software defined radio runs on rasberry pi by julesh · · Score: 1

      Why do radio equipment manufacturers always neglect the lower frequency bands? 150kHz minimum? What if I want to listen in on 125kHz RFID transmissions? How about picking about radio clock signals (usually in the range 50kHz-75kHz, depending on location)? Would it really have made the board that much more expensive to support these frequencies?

  20. How quaint. by queazocotal · · Score: 1

    Any truly innovative bits will be patented.
    Any non-innovative bits can generally be reverse engineered for relatively little money, by buying a device, and having it closely analysed.
    The notion that the manual being secret buys you anything much, once the device is released is basically laughable.

  21. Re:Who cares? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    The OS is a free (as in beer) download if you want to use your own SD, or you can buy an SD with the S preinstalled.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  22. How open is raspberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raspberry is not open. we don't have it's schematic or hardware documentation. Hence it is not fully hackable. It is also pretty much locked to particular chipset. The chipset may get pulled by broadcom any time. They should typically have relied on chipsets like the OMAP that is well documented and understood by a large number of developers. Well, I hope someone else takes the cue and builds on this one....

    1. Re:How open is raspberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, like the Beagleboard? It costs $150, has many of the same design flaws(no vga), and trades away the GPU for an extra 256 MB of memory.

      Unsurprising from TI, considering how they treat the education market with their calculators.

  23. The real education... by drwho · · Score: 1

    I think of this as an advanced arduino and a bit more. NOT as a replacement for a PC. I think it should be the basis for 'doing cool things' - by kids or adults. I expect lots of hardware add-ons will be made, and many of these made for resale. I plan on ordering two model Bs at launch, and then model As as needed. There's lots of projects I have in mind for them. I don't think I am alone in wanting to use these for "cool stuff" - I don't think these are meant to be a replacement for the OLPC.

    I like the model A because it gives me the option to not pay for what I am not going to use. In some cases, the datacomm will be via radio (wifi, hf ham) and so an ethernet board would be a waste. In other cases, I will be using littlle ram, 128mb should be plenty. I'd hope that model C, or some other model sometime soon, will be one aimed at very low cost ($15? $18?), while still providing an open architecture...and not some faster one with more ram and more USB ports. I'd like to see a model, be it this same model C I describe above, made to consume very little power, and have a wide operating temperature range, so that I can use it in remote locations for sensor networks. What also might be fun, though I am not considering this very practical, is one with a single ISA slot, so I can play with some old industrial controller boards I have lying around. or hey, maybe an S-100 bus!

    1. Re:The real education... by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that, they are limiting sales of the first batch to 1/customer and only made model Bs.

      As for your model C desires, have you considered a PIC or Atmel chip?

    2. Re:The real education... by drwho · · Score: 1

      I hadn't heard the limit of 1. I know they have only made the B so far. I am ok with that. No, a PIC won't do, perhaps an Atmel or something similar. But I am not ready to roll with my projects quite yet, so the delay in getting my R-PI is just annoying to my curiosity and doesn't delay and projects (yet).

    3. Re:The real education... by green1 · · Score: 1

      You do actually bring up a good point though, I looked for an operating temperature range for these and couldn't find one. Does anyone know?

      I've been considering a couple of outdoor applications, and while a case is easy enough to build, I'd rather not have to include a heater or an active cooling system if it can be avoided.

  24. Use as server? by JimDarkmagic · · Score: 2

    I've been spoiled with linux on modern machines, so I don't have much experience running it in resource-strapped environments. Do you think I could run this machine as a file server if I put a text-mode linux distro on it?

    1. Re:Use as server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Serving files is mostly just copying bits around. Not much CPU power or RAM required.

    2. Re:Use as server? by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      This thing has more than enough power to run X, so don't bother with the text-mode distro.

      The problem you'll run into is not processing power, but connectivity. No SATA connector, for example. As long as you're OK with serving files from an external USB 2.0 drive or the SD card, you'll be OK.

      http://elinux.org/Rpi_Hardware

    3. Re:Use as server? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      It'll work just don't expect it to perform very well since everything will be forced over a single USB2 link (and remember USB2 is half duplex).

      If you want a low power linux filesever you will probablly be better off looking for a hackable NAS device since the SOCs used in those will have native sata and native ethernet (unlike the one in the Pi which has neither).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  25. Re:Who cares? by Vairon · · Score: 1

    Just because your (and my) phone hardware manufacturer put some closed source pieces of code on our android OS based phones does not mean Android, the google project, is closed source. It's very much open source. Download it here: http://source.android.com/source/downloading.html

    What do you mean when you say it's not open source?

  26. A conflict resolution solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've played with a similar idea a little myself, one thought I had is what if you were every file is "named" in a canonical form that includes all applied tags such as
            someFile#a_tag#b_tag#c_tag
    but could also be accessed with some/all of the tags are included in the "directory tree" instead /c_tag/a_tag/someFile#b_tag
    or /b_tag/a_tag/c_tag/someFile
    They key point being that *all* tags are *always* included in the complete file path, either as part of the "directory tree" or as part of the "file name", thus eliminating any ambiguity. Obviously you can't have two files with the exact same name and tags, but that's fairly analogous to the current "no duplicate file names in the same directory" rule.

    The one problem I can see with this approach is the potential to exceed permitted file name lengths for the hierarchical file system being emulated, though I think most modern file systems allow file names longer than the entire file path usually consumes. One workaround would be to replace the tags with a composite hash In which case you might get something more like someFile#E5QM7DN3, obviously much less legible, but at least more likely to be a legal file name (especially if you truncated the someFile part as much as necessary to ensure that fact) . Perhaps a hybrid approach that includes as many of the (most common?) tags as possible in the file name for legibility purposes:
          someFile#a_tag#b_tag#E5QM7DN3 == a_tag/c_tag/someFile#b_tag#x_tag#E5QM7DN3

    I would also suggest that user account tags be treated specially, even if it's just something like reserving the ~ character for ownership tags, just so that it's easy to distinguish between
    a_file#~Bob#Steve - Bob's file regarding Steve, and
    a_file#~Steve#Bob - Steve's file regarding Bob
    especially since in most cases you'd want to limit Bob's results to his own files (and those he has access to)

    Hmm, if ownership were tracked that way it has the interesting effect of making it easy to transparently allow multiple owners of a file without groups: sharedFile#~Bob#~Steve

    1. Re:A conflict resolution solution by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      one thought I had is what if you were every file is "named" in a canonical form that includes all applied tags such as someFile#a_tag#b_tag#c_tag

      I had been thinking of something similar to that (actually reporting the file in "/a_tag/" as being named "b_tag/c_tag/somefile" which would preserve the file extension at the end for programs that need it, and would actually be "mostly" compatible with programs (since from the a_tag "directory" b/c/file would be a proper path) but the problem is that it would likely confuse programs which track the working directory. The program would think of itself being in "a_tag" and may not save the file back to the b_tag/c_tag/ "subdirectory", but part of the allure of the set based filesystem is that the files would be accessible without being completely specified (being able to see all of my music, or all of my music of an artist, or all in a genre or all by an artist in a genre and so on) so this is a conundrum either way.

      if ownership were tracked that way it has the interesting effect of making it easy to transparently allow multiple owners of a file without groups

      That's an interesting idea I hadn't thought of since I had been thinking of tags being subtractive permissions (ie an untagged file would be fully accessible, by tagging it ~Qzukk it takes away certain permissions, then by tagging it mail it took away other permissions as well, etc. In that case, tagging it ~Bob and ~Steve would mean nobody would have it), and now I see trying to set up useful group permissions this way would really be a beast. With additive permissions I had been worried about giving way more than you wanted, instead I was stuck on a system where it was impossible to give away everything you needed!

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  27. I only want one thing by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Just tell me when MAME and a decent front-end are available for it, complete with FAT32 SD card, 44.1KHz, 16-bit, stereo audio, 60Hz framerate and USB HID joystick support.

  28. Re:Who cares? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    On my bookshelf. Isn't he on yours?

  29. It's an open project - tailor it to your own needs by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    They'll give you the BOM and the schematics. If you're making a commercial product from this, spin your own board. You'd want to do that anyways unless you happen to make rectangular widgets in the first place. And if you need WiFi tack that on yourself. They provide the kernel code too so all you have to do is add the driver yourself.

    Think of the RasPi as a dinky devboard rather than some finished something you'd put in a product and you'll be on the right track.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  30. Asterisk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the $35 version (more memory, faster cpu) be able to run asterisk or trixbox, maybe 2-3 users, 1/2 dozen extensions, 1 hylafax/fax?

    (no more than 2-3 simultaneous users, plus the occasional fax coming in while users on voice calls)

    Thanks!

  31. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about you get me the (legal) source for honeycomb? That's right,bitch.
     
    Sorry, but Apple is pounding your little pet mobile OS in the fucking ass. But I hear open source fucktards like taking it in the ass anyway.
     
    LOLZzzzZZ!!!!onehundredeleven!!!!

  32. Re:It's an open project - tailor it to your own ne by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    From what I can gather broadcom don't like dealing with small customers so if you are planning to grab a design chunk for your own design and you aren't shipping a huge number of units you might want to look elsewhere.

    Plus for smaller runs it may well be cheaper to just buy the pis (and sit them on a support board made on a cheap 2 layer process that adds any extra hardware you need) than to design and have built a board of that caliber.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  33. Re:First customers get them February 24th by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 1

    I don't think you've grasped what type of markets this will be selling to, namely, nerds and education. Everyone I know who's interested in this and counting down the days to availability, knows what it is, what it's generally capable of and more importantly, have a thousand and one potential uses for it already. The types of people buying these are the types of people who will put them to good use, or at least have a lot of fun playing with them.

    A cheap as chips Linux box, with HDMI, audio, USB, networking, SD card reader, GPIO, small enough to fit almost anywhere and consuming just a few watts under full load. Isn't this nerd heaven for Slashdot readers?

    So, just for future reference, I'll also put my "told you so" stake in the ground here and predict that in just a few months there will be many thousands of happy customers and a thriving community of developers, modders and hobbyists.

    I'm not completely sold on how far reaching these will go within the education system, but I'm sure we'll be reading about some pretty cool Raspberry Pi projects by school kids in the not too far distant future too.