Slashdot Mirror


Google's First Employee Departs

redletterdave writes "Craig Silverstein, the first employee hired by Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, will leave the search giant for Khan Academy, an online education portal based in Mountain View, Calif. Silverstein had been with Google shortly after it first launched in the garage of Susan Wojcicki, a friend of both Page and Brin, in September 1998. He had helped Brin and Page develop infrastructure when Google was just a Stanford grad school project, but when he officially joined the company, Silverstein became its technology director. The Khan Academy, where Silverstein is heading next, is a not-for-profit organization that aspires to change the education industry by providing free 'world-class education to anyone anywhere.' Microsoft chairman Bill Gates is an enormous fan of the service, telling CNN that he uses it with his kids."

137 comments

  1. KHAN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obligatory.

    1. Re:KHAN!!! by interkin3tic · · Score: 0

      I enjoy the Khan Academy, but the "There are five lights" educational videos are also pretty good.

  2. is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can't say i'm surprised, none of csilver's open source projects have been properly maintained in years

    1. Re:is this really news? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      He's a better man than I am I guess.

      If I had the $$$$ that I assume this guy must have...I'd have quit a LONG time ago....and spend the rest of my life enjoying my money...traveling the world, bedding new babes, basically one long party the rest of my life.

      But, I guess to each his own...everyone has something different that makes them happy. Whatever it is...DO IT...life on this planet is short, make sure you have no regrets on your deathbed.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:is this really news? by JustNilt · · Score: 1

      He's a better man than I am I guess.

      If I had the $$$$ that I assume this guy must have...I'd have quit a LONG time ago....and spend the rest of my life enjoying my money...traveling the world, bedding new babes, basically one long party the rest of my life.

      But, I guess to each his own...everyone has something different that makes them happy. Whatever it is...DO IT...life on this planet is short, make sure you have no regrets on your deathbed.

      Who says he isn't enjoying his money and bedding "new babes"? Nothing whatsoever in working a job, even as a hobby of sorts, precludes someone from having an active sex life.

      I got a HUGE settlement when I was 18 and spent some years doing exactly what you said. While it's fun for a while, eventually you get bored and need more than that. Finding what it is that fulfills you can be difficult but for this guy, it seems helping get decent education to others is part of it. I found mine and he found his. That's truly the power of money; it allows you to more easily find that which you desire most to accomplish.

      --
      You know the thing about UDP jokes? I don't care if you get it or not.
    3. Re:is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever it is...DO IT...life on this planet is short, make sure you have no regrets on your deathbed.

      You are SO wise!
      I'll read your words every day from now on.

    4. Re:is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember. It isn't money that is the root (square or otherwise) of all evil.

      It's the love of money.

    5. Re:is this really news? by hedley · · Score: 1

      As Somerset Maugham said:

      "Money is like a sixth sense without which you cannot make a complete use of the other five."

    6. Re:is this really news? by smuggl3r · · Score: 1

      life on this planet is short, make sure you have no regrets on your deathbed

      F*ck death. The singularity is coming!

  3. Great run, Craig by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Craig is good egg who walks the walk. Not hungry for power, glory or money, he already has enough of all that. The original Google do-gooder. I sincerely hope that his shoes do not prove too big to fill.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    1. Re:Great run, Craig by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Craig is good egg who walks the walk. Not hungry for power, glory or money, he already has enough of all that. The original Google do-gooder. I sincerely hope that his shoes do not prove too big to fill.

      He was part of a force that changed the internet. Now's he's joining Kahn to help change the world of education (except now he has a lot more clout and a lot more resources). Let's hope he can have a significant impact.

    2. Re:Great run, Craig by justforgetme · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, it is obvious that education at the moment is going through a very creative phase,
      a lot of attention is being directed to the distributed model the KHAN academy made
      popular; I'm very curious to see how the rise of distributed learning will change the
      world of knowledge and accreditation. Could be that the 3k year old paradigm of the
      classroom will be obsolete (or dramatically changed) by the end of the decade.

      --
      -- no sig today
    3. Re:Great run, Craig by XrayJunkie · · Score: 1

      I envy him for this and hope that in a few (hundred) years I can do something similar.

    4. Re:Great run, Craig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The original Google do-gooder.

      Please stop the astroturfing already! Also, there's no need to elevate every ass-hat amongst the first 100 Google employees to saint status. This "cult of person" if getting a bit sickening.

    5. Re:Great run, Craig by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, all worship must rightfully be directed towards our lord and savior Steve Jobs! Speaking highly of anyone associated with the unholy Competitors is heresy and devil worship!

      Or you can just drop the religious shit and accept that the guy did better than most corp employees.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    6. Re:Great run, Craig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google didn't change the Internet in any way at all. It merely brought search engine appearance back to 1995 (a good thing) and ranked by popularity to create an Internet of Facebooks and Wikipedias (a horrible thing).

      As for the Academy, the UK's Open University has been excellent distance learning since the late '60s.

      I swear, any time I see some fanboy on /. proclaim some great new thing and how it will destroy everything which has come before it I hear Cabaret's "Tomorrow Belongs To Me" gradually increasing in volume in the background.

    7. Re:Great run, Craig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +google

      Silverstein has simply seen the writing on the wall with Brin, Page, and Google itself proven to be nothing more than simple profit whores (not that there's anything wrong with it, but hypocritical with respect to any don't be evil pablum).
      Better bail before the sainthood glow diminished so much that there's nothing left to cash in.

    8. Re:Great run, Craig by Kyont · · Score: 1

      Google didn't change the Internet in any way at all. It merely brought search engine appearance back to 1995 (a good thing) and ranked by popularity...

      Disagree! "Merely" doesn't do justice to the change in algorithm. Search engines were *terrible* before Google came along. Don't know about you, but I'm old enough to remember the first time a Google search brought back *amazingly good* results in comparison to others, and pretty much switched then and there. They may not be a perfect company, but but they've had a good 10-14-year run creating hundreds of billions of dollars in efficiencies for thousands of industries. Now search has gotten so good, I don't even see many people using bookmarks anymore.

      --
      You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
    9. Re:Great run, Craig by Xeranar · · Score: 1

      Khan Academy is a tool of very wealthy people who understand very little about education. It's telling that their leadership is almost exclusively stem types with nary a psychologist in sight. I wish him luck but the education system doesn't need his kind of overhaul in the western world.

    10. Re:Great run, Craig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I envy him for this and hope that in a few (hundred) years I can do something similar.

      If you're referencing "Space Seed", then maybe (on METV this Saturday night, btw). : )

    11. Re:Great run, Craig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you assume worshipping, and astroturfing for, Apple is any different from Google, Microsoft, or anybody else? It's all the same shit. It seems like you've bought into the whole corporate cult mystic, and make your prayers to Employee X in Random Company Y. Anybody criticizing must automatically be rooting for Company Z.

      How about growing a spine?

  4. nice! by dropadrop · · Score: 1

    Good move, khan academy is really nice, but could use a lot of improvements on general usability.

    1. Re:nice! by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      All the videos need reworked as well.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    2. Re:nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Particularly the one on English grammar.

  5. If he is the Tech behind Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm guessing he has enough money to last him several lifetimes by now. Good to see people that will work for non-profit at that point.

    1. Re:If he is the Tech behind Google by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      Just because he's going to work for a non-profit orginization doesn't means he wont be handsomely paid. I seriously doubt he'll be making as much at KA as he was at google; but, that doesn't mean he'll work for free.

      Sadly, there are far too many non-profit charity orgs that pay their CEOs and upper staff wads of cash - which means very little charity is going around...except, of course, for those upper staff members.

    2. Re:If he is the Tech behind Google by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Craig does not need to work.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    3. Re:If he is the Tech behind Google by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Craig does not need to work to pay the bills.
      That does not mean that he does not need to work.
      Most self made men feel a need to work after they have "made it".
      It is this drive that makes successful people who they are.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    4. Re:If he is the Tech behind Google by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      At least in the US, 501c3 organizations (most non-profits) are limited in how much they may pay their employees, including leadership staff.

      The CEO of a 501c3 makes considerably less than even low level executives (think junior VP) at a for-profit corp.

      I'm sorry I can't quote the numbers for you right now, but a few months ago my brother in law made the same claim you just did, justifying his aversion to charitable giving. My wife pulled out her smartphone and looked up the facts and debunked his claims to his face. It was sweet.

      There *is* waste and fraud and incompetence in the non-profit sector, as in any human endeavor, but if you think people work there because it's the easy way to riches, you're fooling yourself. Most of the people I hear making such nonsense claims are rationalizing their own selfishness, or at best lazily repeating the claims of others without giving it any thought or investigation.

      Now, go have a nice day. :)

      --
      WALSTIB!
  6. Education industry by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    "Change the education industry"? That's a strange choice of words, considering Khan Academy coursework is free and so is K-12 education in America. Should we even be thinking of educating our children as an industry?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Education industry by sourcerror · · Score: 5, Informative

      Khan Academy doesn't stop at K-12. There's plenty of college level material there.

    2. Re:Education industry by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      Considering the about of money and people wrapped up in it, I think it's fair to say it's an industry. You don't want the education "product" to be treated as one size fits all. And of course you don't want drone teachers - but the whole support system to get the best education could benefit from lessons learned from other industries. The administration staff in all the school I've dealt with so far have been awful.

    3. Re:Education industry by mcavic · · Score: 0

      Should we even be thinking of educating our children as an industry?

      K-12 education isn't free - it's taxpayer funded. So yes, it's an industry, but healthcare is probably an even bigger industry.

    4. Re:Education industry by sycomonkey · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It got me through a particularly horrible multivar calculus professor a few years ago.

      --
      --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
    5. Re:Education industry by rec9140 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "free and so is K-12 education in America."

      Wrong, K-12 education is NOT FREE.

      You pay a school district tax of some sort, period. Kids or no kids every one has to unjustly pay for something they get no benefit from, and for those that choose to use private and parochial schools they get the privlege to PAY TWICE. Their school tax and tuition. Should be one or the other.

      US education should be soley tuition based. you have a rug rat YOU pay when they sign up, when they graduate HS, you quit paying the school tax.

      No need to reply about a how the education system where every one pays benefits soceity as whole, yadda, yadda, yahdda. I've heard this before, disagree. Thanks.

      Sending kids to school who don't want to be there and disrupt classes requiring they be separated out, expelled, "alternative schools" is just a waste of money.

      --
      1311393600 - Back to Black
    6. Re:Education industry by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      In matters of dealing with staff and teachers they act like a business, but in all other pursuits, every bit of efficiency derived from a business model goes flying out the windows. This is because their money keeps coming no matter what. They can be epic failures, make all kinds of bumbling mistakes, do an over-all horrible job, waste a bunch of money over and over again, only to be rewarded with many more years of funding and really good paychecks. Gee, wonder why improvement and positive change takes soooooo long and is resisted at every turn? You have people running the show who have NEVER held a job! Kids who went to school, kept going to school, couldn't find work, went to school again, became teachers, then moved into administration where they duly camp out for the next thirty to forty years. Hasn't anyone been paying attention? No. they have no idea, no freaking clue whatsoever how to run an organization properly or deal with subordinates. On top of this, they have a PhD that clouds their mind into thinking they are some awesome contributor to society.

      Oh! You have a PhD!? What research projects are you involved in? Uh...um..... Have you taken any classes lately or engaged in professional development or modern management training? Uh...um..... Where did you work before getting into college administration? Uh....um....

      I think I need a mail order PhD too!!

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    7. Re:Education industry by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Wrong, K-12 education is NOT FREE. You pay a school district tax of some sort

      Free at the point of delivery.

      Do you think anyone is so stupid that they need you, of all people, to point out to that it does in fact have to be funded somehow?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Education industry by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      Wasn't school education not in the least invented to have standardized workers to use in industry? So no, of course it shouldn't be that way, but maybe that's what it started out as, and is supposed to be, if it wasn't for teachers who genuinely love people and teaching, and pupils who love to be subversive and challenge their teachers. Who knows what we would have without those two factors... probably people with moustaches and top hats implanting steam powered chips into the brains of starving people in blue overalls.

      Don't get me wrong though, my kudos to all good teachers, *because* so many teachers suck so very badly, and because the houses they have to work in are basically coated in evil slime (whatever that is lol) more often than not. Have a nice day and never give up.

    9. Re:Education industry by softwareGuy1024 · · Score: 2

      US education should be soley tuition based.

      Please name me one country where this works.

  7. Slow to Grow? by FairAndHateful · · Score: 1

    Almost 14 years with a start up? I thought the new model was to resume build and jump, the sooner, the better. Maybe it's different for people who get in that early.

    1. Re:Slow to Grow? by jholyhead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Where do you jump to when you already work for one of the biggest companies on the planet and are richer than Midas?

      It took him 14 years to find a job he wanted more than the one he had. If only we were all so lucky.

    2. Re:Slow to Grow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's about more than just a career.

    3. Re:Slow to Grow? by Splodgey · · Score: 1

      Croesus was the rich one. :-)

      --
      Sigs are for losers....oh wait...damnit
    4. Re:Slow to Grow? by Kynde · · Score: 1

      Croesus was the rich one. :-)

      So true, but I wouldn't venture too far down the "Midas wasn't" alley.

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
  8. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Netscape search site perhaps.

    All the cool kids used Alta Vista.

    Now looking for a Google replacement.

    If you can tough it out for a bit... My plan is to wait a few more years (for shit to really hit the fan) and then introduce a search engine that's a simple form on a page.

    It's going to be huge.

    I wish I was being sarcastic. :(

  9. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by rylin · · Score: 1

    Uh, no.
    Search was their first product.

    Google Groups was later. End of '01 perhaps?

  10. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Evil compared to what? Mother Theresa and Ghandi perhaps, but compared to Facebook and the worst of the worst that is Microsoft they are still saints.

    And you do know that almost every single complaint is filed by Microsoft, either by proxy or in the open as partners against Google? This has even been documented and verifiead as a fact (even by Microsoft) so its no tinfoil crackpot theory.

  11. Not a big change in development stack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Not a big change in development stack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google's big. He's a C++ coder.

  12. Free advice for big fan of free learning! by migla · · Score: 0, Troll

    Dear Mr Gates,

    I have noticed how fond you are of the excellent efforts of the Khan Academy to disseminate knowledge to anyone for free.

    I'm very excited to have found two more projects that should really be up your alley. You will probably want to donate billions to them right away!

    They are very much in line with what the Khan Academy is trying to accomplish, but they are working at another perspective of knowledge.

    They are about fascilitating the dissemination, creation and construction of knowledge and information on computing hardware:

    http://gnu.org/

    http://linux.com/

    They are Free and Open instructions for computers (machines to process data with). With these free of cost and Free as in freedom software projects and the excellent efforts of the Khan Academy, all the children of Earth (with access to computing hardware - that is yet another avenue you could look into) can really get a leg up.

    Sincerelly,
    Dr Pointer-Outer-Of-Obvious-Ironies-Dinkelspiel

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    1. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by jholyhead · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure he'll get back to you as soon as he has eradicated AIDS and cured cancer.

      Sincerely,

      Mr GetYourPrioritiesInOrder Esq.

    2. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by jholyhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one is stopping people from making a personal choice about the software they use. No one is forcing people to use MS Office.

    3. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, most schools do force you. And then the whole lock-in thing.

    4. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dur software must be free, dur software developers must live on support consulting only.

    5. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen some raving fanbois in my time but you, sir, have taken the cake.
       
      I think you need your doctor to review your medications.

    6. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by Mitreya · · Score: 2
      No one is stopping people from making a personal choice about the software they use. No one is forcing people to use MS Office.

      Maybe on your planet. On my planet, everyone assumes and uses MS Office files. My battle is down to trying to get people to use 2007 (doc/xls/etc) files, because not all of my computers have new MS Office installed. And even that battle is being lost. I could swear that new PowerPoint purposely makes "compatible" saves bloated and damages things (formulas/animations) in conversion.
      I dare you to start responding "I've chosen to use open software" to every MS Office attachment you see in your inbox. See if you can last more than an hour before you are forced to use MS Word/Excel/Powerpoint.

    7. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Dear Mr Gates,

      I have noticed how fond you are of the excellent efforts of the Khan Academy to disseminate knowledge to anyone for free.

      I'm very excited to have found two more projects that should really be up your alley. You will probably want to donate billions to them right away!

      They are very much in line with what the Khan Academy is trying to accomplish, but they are working at another perspective of knowledge.

      They are about fascilitating the dissemination, creation and construction of knowledge and information on computing hardware:

      http://gnu.org/

      http://linux.com/

      They are Free and Open instructions for computers (machines to process data with). With these free of cost and Free as in freedom software projects and the excellent efforts of the Khan Academy, all the children of Earth (with access to computing hardware - that is yet another avenue you could look into) can really get a leg up.

      Sincerelly,
      Dr Pointer-Outer-Of-Obvious-Ironies-Dinkelspiel

      Haha, nicely done!

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    8. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wasting your time, dude. On Nu-Slashdot nobody gives a fuck about Free software. Only how much they can suck up to their favorite corporate master. Around here Bill Gates is a demi-god who can do no wrong. Just ask them, they'll be glad to tell you and mod you down for daring to say otherwise. In summary, this place has descended to barely above enthusiast site level. You'd get better commentary from Engadget.

    9. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Slashdot: where the truth and common sense is as welcome as the Ebola virus. You can think groups like this for thoroughly destroying a once halfway decent website.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    10. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "No one is stopping people from making a personal choice about the software they use."

      When they stop you from knowing you have a choice, they stop you from making a choice.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    11. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by jholyhead · · Score: 1

      There are many open source office applications that will save to MS Office formats. Your laziness is not Bill Gates' fault.

    12. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by jholyhead · · Score: 1

      When has Microsoft prevented any of the open source alternatives from marketing their offerings?

    13. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      I'm not here to play reverse-oracle to you, son.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    14. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm not here to play reverse-oracle to you, son.

      Basically admitting that you have nothing to back up your claim.

    15. Re:Free advice for big fan of free learning! by jholyhead · · Score: 1

      No, you're here to make me look good.

      Nice work, son.

  13. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by AlecC · · Score: 2

    Before Google, I used Altavista.

    I am afraid that Google is a proof of the axiom that all power corrupts. While not seeing them as totally evil, the fact of being huge and rich has distorted their vision so that they cannot see the dark side of the things that they do, I think they still mean well, they think that they are "doing no evil". But their view is so distorted by the point that they are looking from that they have lost touch with what ordinary people think. They are so intent on open information that they cannot understand why people, quite honourably and innocently, want too keep some information private to themselves.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  14. Free??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have property tax bills that say otherwise. K-12 education in America is anything but free.

    Like most taxes in America it's unfair, racially biased, and (usually) badly managed.

    Just because you don't write a tuition check to the school for K-12 doesn't make it free. It's far from free.

    1. Re:Free??? by Bucc5062 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And your alternative is what?

      Don't just complain and whine about unfair taxes, tell me what you would propose that would be better for education. Keep in mind that you have a diverse population of children ranging from very well off to homeless. I would hope you want every child to have some education, because you would believe that an educated nation is a strong nation.

      Please, provide a workable plan to educate our youth that does not include some social sharing of cost. Here at /. you'd get some great feed back and perhaps it can be presented to the President for consideration.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    2. Re:Free??? by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      Present to the President??!! I don't think so. The property taxes are paid to the state and local tax boards and school districts. The President can never change education for the better at the K-12 level; only lower the lowest common denominator to drag all students down to an even lower level.

      Real change in education happens best at the local level.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    3. Re:Free??? by rec9140 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Don't just complain and whine about unfair taxes, tell me what you would propose that would be better for education. Keep in mind that you have a diverse population of children ranging from very well off to homeless. I would hope you want every child to have some education, because you would believe that an educated nation is a strong nation."

      You have the RIGHT to an educaton.

      You have the RIGHT to PAY for that education.

      You do NOT have the right to free education.

      "I would hope you want every child to have some education,"

      Sure, BUT you best be prepared to PAY FOR IT! I've heard all this "education nation is a strong nation." Education is good, its just not a free ride that has no cost. Good schools cost $$$$. I went to one of the top 2 HS in my state, and the property taxes for the school were 3-4x that of the neighboring districts. Hiring, your not even in the running unless you had or were in a Masters program. There were more Doctorates teaching everything from Kindergarten to AP Calculus, than most of the surrounding districts had in total COMBINED. Getting a job at this district was like hitting the lotto jackpot, they got the top of the top of the top of the top of teaching canidates be it fresh from school or other districts. and they paid very well, top of the list for the area. People purchased homes in this area, just so they could send their deliquents to this district. And homes were not cheap, and still are not cheap, even for homes 30-40 years old. Simply because of the schools.

      Why should *I* pay to educate YOUR CHILD? ? Rule #1, don't tell me about the benefit to soceity mumbo jumbo. You chose to have a child, YOU PAY for their needs, and that includes education! What you want me to pay for your food too! The whole process is totally un-American in the way it taxes everyone child or not, I would expect something like this in some Socialist or Communist country.

      Can't afford the tuition to the local district, parochial, or private, then home school.

      School districts should work the same as private and parochial. If the budget for the school is $x, and there are y students,then $x/y =$tuition. Period.

      What happens when the community has no kids to go to the local district. Shutdown.

      What happens as the number children decreases, cuts in staff, pay, building closures, sell buildings, tuition increases. What about sports.. you want to be in x sports, this is the fee, same goes for cheerleaders, pantherettes, majorettes, band, choir, glee club, Key Club, etc..

      The area I am talking about, has NO BUSINESS base for taxes, its 95% homes, there are few office building complexes, and a few business that existed before the community plan was changed, there are no business districts. The main road through the area is 4 lanes, major north south artery, and when you get to this community the businesses that lined the road in the previous community, instantly disappear, and don't reappear till you get to the next community. Its done intentionally, by design. Its strictly a residential community.

      Having kids has repercussions, and COSTS. None of which should I bear, when I chose not to have kids.

      --
      1311393600 - Back to Black
    4. Re:Free??? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can either help pay for the lower classes to be educated, or you can deal with the consequences of having large numbers of uneducated unemployable people, and all the social problems that come with that. Which do you really think is better for you?

      I choose not to have kids either. But I understand that I'm going to be a lot better off if the youth I have to deal with in the future are in school and not on the streets. If I send them to school now, I can live off of their tax dollars later. If I don't send them to school now, I'll be paying for their incarceration into the foreseeable future.

      Investing in the society in which you live is a rational self-interested decision.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Free??? by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      (Disclaimer, I have no children)
      "Why should *I* pay to educate YOUR CHILD? "

      Because you don't want my child coming up to you one night and beating the crap out of you for your wallet so he or she can feed their drug habit.
      because you don't want my child costing you more when they grow up and continuing the cycle of limited work options due to lack of education.

      There are people that exist in this world that do not have money. They cannot afford to pay for private education, they cannot afford to pay for healthcare, they cannot afford to live on the money they receive from their below minimum wage job. What do you do with these people. They exist today. They are right there in the poorest section of a city or town. They live in shacks, tunnels, abandoned homes.

      Do you suggest we just let them die? Provide no help, no assistance, just let them starve to death? They exist NOW, today, and they eat, and breath, and live.

      Perhaps you suggest we round up the poor, the least able to afford anything and put them in a camp. Who pays for the camp?
      Perhaps you suggest we round up the poor, those with no education, because they could not afford it and ship them off to third world hell holes to work as indentured slaves.
      Perhaps you feel we should sterilize the poor so they stop having children and stop being a burden on your society.

      You seem like one of these people that looks at a homeless person and says "get a job" like they are plentiful and hiring someone who wears a skull cap of tinfoil.

      As Hatta comments, you help pay for the poor so you do not deal with them rising up and killing you. To put it another way, the more unbalanced a structure, the easier it is to tear down. That is why I accept paying to educate other people's children even when I have none.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    6. Re:Free??? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Not true. In the 1960s, the federal government was instrumental in breaking up the apartheid public education system of the South.

      And please, do not say, "what good did it do?" Compared to 50 or 100 years ago, Americans are far better educated. The decline we perceive is mainly a factor of 1) relative comparisons to the rest of the world and 2) the inclusion of a higher percentage of the population in modern testing. There were no good old days.

    7. Re:Free??? by StuartHankins · · Score: 2

      +9000 Insightful. It's never cheaper when you pay reactively rather than proactively.

      It may not be fair that your neighbor has 5 kids, but taking care of that problem as a society is another (complicated) issue. Having the children turn to crime or starve is not an acceptable solution for me. But continuing to allow people to irresponsibly breed is also not working. Parents are now children themselves, and having 2 parents (of any sex) is a luxury most children do not have. Even with 2 parents, many cannot afford to feed the mouths they have created.

      Could the government insist that everyone receiving welfare funds be either sterilized or on birth control? That would be a tough fight. Could the government *reduce* funding for each new child rather than increase it? Another tough fight.

      I'd love to hear a solution that considers where we are headed and how it can be changed... the current system is broken and rewards those who breed irresponsibly by placing the burden on those of us who are careful and intelligent. The movie "Idiocracy" comes to mind.

    8. Re:Free??? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But continuing to allow people to irresponsibly breed is also not working.

      The birth rate in most developed countries is decreasing. Not because of any policy mandate, but because the people choose it. We need to figure out what they're doing and copy it.

      What they're doing is educating their people, and providing opportunities for them. Educated people have fewer children. Moderately well off people have fewer children.

      What we're doing in the US is the exact opposite. We're cutting education, we're expanding economic opportunities for the rich and not the lower classes. And when 30 years of ever increasing inequality bear fruit in social problems, conservatives will blame the very people they refused to help.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:Free??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [sarcasm]
      Oh, there's no need to educate the lower classes. We just have to stop giving them free/subsidized health care, food, or any sort of assistance. Without all that welfare, their children will just die off on their own! Let the free market (our one and only true god) decide if the economy can bare all those children, and which child gets to live*!

      *but to hell with them if anybody decides to support abortion!
      [/sarcasm]

    10. Re:Free??? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      i would give you 50 examples of varying degrees of workable schools but the DOE kinda screwed that up so we only have once chance of finding the right way of doing something.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    11. Re:Free??? by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      You're doing the same thing the AC did above. If not a troll, list a few keeping in mind that "Not everyone can afford education without help". Enough of this 'This system suck, there are better ways" without some constructive input.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    12. Re:Free??? by Shoe+Puppet · · Score: 2

      You have the RIGHT to an educaton.

      You have the RIGHT to PAY for that education.

      You do NOT have the right to free education.

      Poor people have the right to education. Poor people are not able to pay for education. Therefore, poor people -- at least -- have the right to free education. QED.

      --
      (+1, Disagree)
    13. Re:Free??? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      As I said, we only get one example and it is poor. If we could get rid of that we could possibly get many more examples and see which ones work and which ones don't.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  15. The question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when will assholes like Vic Gundotra and Andy Rubin resign? The world would be a much better place without people like them.

    Also, what's with every other story being about Google anyway?

    --
    I value my privacy so I NEVER use any product/service from the Google creeps.

    1. Re:The question is... by chill · · Score: 1

      VASTLY better than every other damn story featuring a video of Timothy Lord shilling something.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:The question is... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      ...when will assholes like Vic Gundotra and Andy Rubin resign? The world would be a much better place without people like them.
      When Mercedes Benz designs an S-class with the douche bag VP option, that way the car can do all the douchy things your VP would while you drive to work.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  16. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by alphatel · · Score: 5, Funny

    All the cool kids used Alta Vista.

    You weren't one of them. We used Asta la Vista

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
  17. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All the cool kids used Alta Vista.

    I used to use Alta Vista as my main search engine, back when they supported boolean queries (the "NEAR" keyword!). When they dropped that capability, I abandoned them. Google didn't really become better than Alta Vista. Alta Vista became worse than Google.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  18. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

    All the cool kids used Alta Vista.

    I remember around 1996-1997 when Altavista turned to absolute shit, didn't matter what you searched for, at least half of the top 20 results were porn, porn and more porn.

    Of course, that was back in the days when search engines often just assumed that pages were honest about their own content so just having a huge block of keywords in the same color as the page background at the bottom of every page meant you'd show up in searches for those keywords.

    When I first heard of the basic idea of how Google's search algorithm worked I was actually a bit surprised, even as a teenager at the time I had kind of assumed every major search engine worked in a similar way. I suspect I was far from alone in that assumption...

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  19. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Evil compared to what? Mother Theresa and Ghandi perhaps, but compared to Facebook and the worst of the worst that is Microsoft they are still saints.

    Actually, I'd class Google as a saint compared to Mother Teresa, who believed that suffering was good, and ensured it was widespread in her "hospices", and publicly stated that poverty should not be alleviated because it also was a good thing.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  20. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by mcavic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember when Alta Vista came out with natural language searches. You could ask it What's the name of President Clinton's cat? And it would give you links for where to buy socks.

  21. Key word: with by BucketOfLard · · Score: 1

    What jumped out at me was that BillG says he uses the Khan videos WITH his kids. Kudos on the parenting, Bill.

  22. best of luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best of luck dude! We need people like you do things like these!

  23. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by shadowmas · · Score: 2

    Indeed! it used to be great. Before they went all out commercial.

  24. Re:first by FhnuZoag · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait for you to leave slashdot.

  25. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People have such ridiculously selective memories about Alta Vista. Yes, it was once awesome, but it sucked because it had no search algorithm, it just matched keywords. This worked fine at first, but people (and by people I mean porn sites) pretty quickly learned that all it took to game the system was to put huge blocks of tiny text at the bottom of every page containing every keyword they could think of. Pretty soon, it didn't matter what you searched for, you got back the same 10 porn sites. So yes, Google became better than Alta Vista, because they figured out a system that was at least marginally difficult to game.

  26. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    After or as they bought out deja news....

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  27. Khan Academy by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    Where he will teach super-human reasoning courses like "LMGTFY 101" and "Your Way With Eels 510".

  28. The Khan Academy has employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought it was a one-man show.

    1. Re:The Khan Academy has employees? by lsolano · · Score: 2

      It was. Now is a two-man show.

    2. Re:The Khan Academy has employees? by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      Ignore the man behind the curtain now.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    3. Re:The Khan Academy has employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.khanacademy.org/about/the-team

    4. Re:The Khan Academy has employees? by nedlohs · · Score: 2
  29. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 2

    I'd class Google as a saint compared to Mother Teresa, who ...

    The new Reverend Dr Hyde I presume.

  30. No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Religion says that conformity trumps individual sovereignty, and Mother Teresa was true to those beliefs.

    Anarchy says that individual sovereignty trumps conformity, and Ghandi was true to those beliefs.

    I know which one of these two icons I look up to.

  31. Re:first by fotoflojoe · · Score: 1

    Oh, if I only had mod points.

  32. Brain drain by laffer1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This guy is leaving for a good cause and all, but I've noticed a pattern of Google employees leaving lately. Even newer recruits don't seem to stay long. I wonder if they've taken the fun out of working there? Obviously, something has changed. It can't be the computing problems, because they still have huge challenges.

    1. Re:Brain drain by your_neighbor · · Score: 1

      If you consider MBTI, which IMHO is a good tool for team building, most inventive types (consider ENTP for example) are very good at startup phase but lack the tools to keep everything running under schedule, and then someone hires beancouting types. The problem arise when desires surpasses means, and working place becomes politicized. Coincidentally, the inventive types which hate politics loose power and then mediocrity takes place, and to invent you must be part of a special group or have MBA and etc.

    2. Re:Brain drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The explanation is much simpler than that. Google is really big now. Even if the percentage of turnover is the same - or lower! - the absolute numbers are much higher. Further, there's more media attention on Google, and people share Google stories more frequently. In short, Google employee retention might not have changed much at all - you're just hearing about it more.

  33. Begining of the end? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    Obviously rats leaving a syncing ship :)

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  34. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    Gandhi was a dick! I used to party with him, and he would just do a bunch of coke, drink whiskey, call people on the phone trying to start fights, and then pass out on the couch. Sometimes he would make it out of the house to finish the dispute he started on the phone with one of his neighbors, but that was rare. One time he totaled a car in reverse in the fucking driveway! WTF?! It was kinda fun to party with him, if you could get the fuck out of there when the police came. Good times.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  35. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by Guppy · · Score: 1

    I used to use Alta Vista as my main search engine, back when they supported boolean queries (the "NEAR" keyword!). When they dropped that capability, I abandoned them.

    I'd completely forgotten about that, it was quite useful. Are there any modern search engines that support a NEAR-type search parameter?

  36. No, doing 3,000 year old schools better by peter303 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Khan uses the oldest educational technique in the book- the demonstration lecture. Its just packaged better. First someone who clearly explains it. Second in a right-length chunk of a few minutes, not a forced 60 minutes. And on demand, anywhere, not on a schedule at a certain location. And almost free, after it is done the first couple of times.

    People have been trying a half century to properly use television and computers in education. This seems to be one of the better results.

    1. Re:No, doing 3,000 year old schools better by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      The recent Wired article about Khan Academy makes me think there's a bit more to it than that.

      Apparently actual classrooms are using it in an "inverted" model, where students watch the lectures at home and then do work in class. That way the students are already prepared to understand the classroom assignments, and if they need help the teacher is there for them.

      Would be interesting to see if this model works for every subject and with every lecturer, or if there's something particularly good about Khan's lessons.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:No, doing 3,000 year old schools better by DaleSwanson · · Score: 1

      Would be interesting to see if this model works for every subject and with every lecturer, or if there's something particularly good about Khan's lessons.

      I'd definitely argue that a large portion of the success is due to Khan's teaching ability. There are plenty of other videos on youtube explaining the same concepts, but Khan's are the best I've found.

      I think there are several factors that make Khan great at what he's doing. To begin, he's a very smart guy, a MIT grad electrical engineer. While there are plenty of equally intelligent people in the world, not many of them are teaching K-12. On the other hand, he isn't arrogant or condescending, which tends to be off-putting to someone trying to learn something. Instead, he often makes it clear that he doesn't know everything. Then, there is his obvious passion about the subjects. Just watch some of the videos, and it becomes clear he is truly amazed by this stuff. This inspires the person watching to want to understand the material so they can also be amazed. He is also rather amusing, casual, and informal in his presentation, without wasting too much time or coming off as desperate to make the student laugh.

      About the style of the videos, 10 minutes works very well. It's just enough time to cover one small concept. Plus it has the huge benefit of the 'just one more' effect. Similar to games that lead to 'just one more turn' and then it's 4am (Civilization), it's much easy to watch just a few more 10 minute videos than to start watching 40 or 60 minute video lectures.

    3. Re:No, doing 3,000 year old schools better by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      I've never liked that model. I had a teacher (high school calculus in fact) whose classroom time consisted of sitting at the desk while the kids were doing assigned problems (reading material at home). Anyone with a problem could ask for help, and *maybe* that problem would get solved on the board.

      It was the most boring and uninspiring approach to mathematics I'd ever been part of. A class should do the opposite: it should be lively, and bring something new to the kids minds right then and there, to keep them interested and to make them think of the possibilities. At the end, the kid should be energized with new knowledge.

      I believe pre-reading material before class is a strategic mistake. It's like reading the end of a mystery novel before the beginning. When you already know who the killer is, the story becomes flat and not very interesting. The same is true if you first read the cool new knowledge in a book chapter before the teacher gives it to you, *again*. It drains a lot of the fun (education-wise) out of the school time. A better system is to read the chapters *after* the class that covered it, if necessary.

  37. I interviewed with him by LS · · Score: 3

    I got an interview with Google in 1999, and I had the opportunity to have lunch with Craig. He never mentioned to me that he was the 1st employee at the time.

    I do remember what he asked me. I was interviewing for the job of initializing their QA department. He asked me how I would look for problems in an indexer that stored MILLIONS (ha) of pages. I had to ask what exactly an indexer was.

    On the way out, I spent too much time flirting with the hot red head they had at the front desk, and Larry walked by and saw what I was doing. I don't think that's why I didn't get the job though.

    DAMMMMMNN I wish I got that job!!!!!!!!

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  38. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 2

    I remember when Alta Vista came out with natural language searches. You could ask it What's the name of President Clinton's cat? And it would give you links for where to buy sock fetish porn.

    There. Fixed that for you. No, seriously. I'm not kidding.

  39. Postmodern Philanthropy by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    I like it!

  40. KHAAAAAAAAAAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i really hope someone at Google screamed "Khaaaaaaan!" if for nothing else than effect.

  41. I wonder how much he is worth by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know?

  42. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    I used alta vista in high school. A teacher told me I should use yahoo instead "because real people are indexing that, so it's better."

  43. Overheard in Eric Schmidt's Office by cashman73 · · Score: 1
    Eric Schmidt was screaming, furious at the news one of the oldest Google employees was leaving, "F**king Salman Khan is a f**king pussy. I'm going to f**king bury that guy! I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f**king kill Khan Academy!"

    Authorities were later called to Google HQ to dislodge a chair from the windshield of Sergey Brinn's Ferrari out in the parking lot, and a glass company was immediately called in to repair the window.

    1. Re:Overheard in Eric Schmidt's Office by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1

      And as the chair went through the window, the few witnessing it from below heard Schmidt from through the jagged opening screaming "Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!".

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
    2. Re:Overheard in Eric Schmidt's Office by throwawayusername · · Score: 1

      good catch.

      Does indeed show the difference between the two.

  44. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

    She believed that pain was a good thing and poverty should not be eliminated? That's not exactly unsaintlike. Maybe a bit more pessimistic than many of us comparatively wealthy and healthy would want to admit to ourselves, but I imagine that dealing with the sick and dying every day would make one re-evaluate the human condition.

    As far as not giving out painkillers in her hospitals, maybe she should have, but I think it's hard to make the case that she was providing something worse than the alternative. I don't think it's fair to say "This person was trying to do something good, but she should have been doing it better, so it's not good."

  45. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by psnyder · · Score: 1
  46. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Pretty soon, it didn't matter what you searched for, you got back the same 10 porn sites.

    You know, I think I only got a porn link from an Alta Vista search if I was explicitly searching for porn. At least, that was in the days when it had boolean search criteria, which I almost always used (e.g. "Fractional NEAR (differintegral OR calculus)"). Maybe it went even further downhill than I thought after they abandoned the boolean query.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  47. Re:first by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for you to leave slashdot.

    Does that mean that you are intent on leaving Slashdot before he leaves?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  48. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by mcavic · · Score: 1

    I never saw that, but I believe you.

  49. Inverted model worked for 2nd year calculus by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Apparently my 2nd year calculus professor believed in this model. He assigned sections to read from the textbook and exercises to do as homework. Homework was collected at the beginning of class and then he lectured on the topics covered in those sections. He wanted us to be "prepared and qualified" to listen to his lecture. He announced this approach on day 1 of class, half the students immediately dropped his class and signed up with a different professor. Too bad, I did better in 2nd year calculus than I did in 1st. He made us work hard and we enjoyed greater success as a result.

  50. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by Kynde · · Score: 1

    I remember when Alta Vista came out with natural language searches. You could ask it What's the name of President Clinton's cat? And it would give you links for where to buy socks.

    The thing I remember about alta vista is that when I searched for "UDP proxy", for example, all I got was a hundred pr0n links without a single link to anything actually relating to UDP or proxying. I think it was just about then when I switched to google.

    --
    1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
  51. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something reasonable from a dotcom millionaire? Not a hobby electric car company or Space Nutter delusions?

  52. Re:Bill Gates has kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of my high school classmates posted a creative writing piece with nothing to do with porn on our school's server. But for some reason he named it "I like pornography on the internet." The page got several hits a day from Alta Vista and others for people searching "pornography," so apparently it wasn't to hard to game the people gaming the system.