Slashdot Mirror


Fair Labor Association Finds Foxconn Factory "First Class," Says Labor Watchdog

Richard.Tao writes "The Fair Labor Association found that Apple's plant where iPhones and iPads are far better than those at garment factories or other facilities elsewhere in the country. A quote: 'The lead investigator stated "The facilities are first-class; the physical conditions are way, way above average of the norm."' Which leaves the question, what is the acceptable norm?"

219 comments

  1. Foxconn and Apple by bonch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Fair Labor Association found that Apple's plant...

    It's not Apple's plant. They're the biggest electronics factory in the world and make products for Dell, HP, Nintendo, Microsoft, Google, and more. Seems like a Greenpeace situation where Apple gets singled out because it generates more media coverage. Apple has actually been cited as the most proactive when it comes to monitoring work conditions in the factories they contract with.

    1. Re:Foxconn and Apple by ericdano · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is this -1?

      Why don't we examine some of the OTHER factories in China that do business with like, oh I dunno, WALMART? Or Sears? Or JC Penny? Or the GAP? Wonder how proactive Walmart is about working conditions where it gets its products from...

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:Foxconn and Apple by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      Have you been in a Walmart? People already equate them with large scale human suffering. Apple on the other hand has some real reputation to protect and that's good news for Foxconn workers.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    3. Re:Foxconn and Apple by bloodhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They get singled out because they are by far and away the most profitable company and much of that profit is directly manufactured in that plant giving Apple far more influence over the running of that plant than any other company in the world. Apple has a huge margin they can play with and Foxconn would basically do anything to keep sucking in the profit that apple generates for them.

    4. Re:Foxconn and Apple by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it's because between we few honest commenters there are an active few corporate interests. It is what it is, because /. is free and open to all - even shills.

      I wouldn't change it. If you like heavily edited well censored pap there are lots of sources for that. /. almost stands alone as a place where we can get our troll or truth on - as we prefer. In my experience there's a lot to be learned from both the honest folk and the trolls - and /. is the place to watch to see where the attempts at memes are going.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    5. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is notable and attracting attention. The Foxconn workers could use some better working and living conditions.

      But this is China. The rules are different there. Applying your rules to a place they don't fit is going to seriously fuck some shit up.

    6. Re:Foxconn and Apple by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, please. They get singled out because some guy with a better haircut than you said he loves his phone.

      Deny it if you like but this 'they have the highest margins' rationale only came up recently, curiously around the time it came out that the workers working on iProducts are treated better.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Foxconn and Apple by iamhassi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not Apple's plant.

      True, but Apple gives them most of their business, like when Apple bought Samsung's entire supply of ram, almost half of the world's supply of NAND Flash RAM, for the 3GS.

      If Apple said "Pay them more, give them less hours and more time off or we'll go elsewhere" Foxconn would, in a heartbeat, because they have no choice, Apple is the majority of Foxconn's business.

      I love my iPhone, but this whole mess really has me thinking twice about my next phone. If there was another smartphone that ran IOS and had a more "ethical" factory I'd probably purchase that rather than another iPhone, even if it was a bit more (10%? 20%?).

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    8. Re:Foxconn and Apple by symbolset · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Others do worse, it's true. The measure of a moral man isn't that he hurt others better or worse than his peers did. It's that he did the Right Thing of the choices afforded him.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    9. Re:Foxconn and Apple by icebraining · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      It's now at +5. Your argument is invalid.

    10. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's not Apple's plant."

      Foxconn have many facilities, did you consider that Apple is a big enough customer, that Foxconn have a factory dedicated to producing Apple branded products?

    11. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This survey was a setup anyways.

      announced long before taking place.

    12. Re:Foxconn and Apple by peragrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just remember Nokia, motorola, HTC also build their phones in China, but they don't even get apples minimal level of raising the workers up.

      There are ZERO phones out there made without sweatshops like this.

      Apple gets singled out because they are large, but smaller shops are the ones who treat them the worst.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    13. Re:Foxconn and Apple by flyneye · · Score: 0

      O.K. good point let's edit this for some truthiness.

                The Fair Labor Association found that the plant had all its bribes ready, they had been threatened in the hotel by government toadies the night before, but found the money soothing to their anxiety. Thumbs up!

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    14. Re:Foxconn and Apple by koan · · Score: 1

      Apple also generates the most income, you have links for your "greenpeace" comment and apparently some rant about kiddie porn but nothing linked to information showing as you claim
      "Apple has actually been cited as the most proactive when it comes to monitoring work conditions in the factories they contract with."

      So let me help you with that, Apple was the first to join the FLA
      http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-17/foxconn-auditor-finds-tons-of-issues-.html

      That's nice right? Proves your point and all that had to happen was being "singled" out, several suicides and a TON OF BAD PRESS.

      You're an apologist.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    15. Re:Foxconn and Apple by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      They get singled out because they're an American company with profit margins so high that they could feasibly employ American workers at American factories and still make a decent profit. This sentiment is compounded by our current manufacturing crisis.

      However, I don't really believe it would be "the right thing to do". I think the sooner we accept the reality of a global economy, and start to better prepare for it, the better off we'll be.

    16. Re:Foxconn and Apple by pegasustonans · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just remember Nokia, motorola, HTC also build their phones in China, but they don't even get apples minimal level of raising the workers up.

      There are ZERO phones out there made without sweatshops like this.

      Apple gets singled out because they are large, but smaller shops are the ones who treat them the worst.

      I see a lot of people rushing to defend Apple, a large corporation that recently posted record profits.

      I don't see many concerned about the lives of these workers.

      It's a sad world we live in.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    17. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Dripdry · · Score: 2

      what would "preparing for it" look like?

      --
      -
    18. Re:Foxconn and Apple by paiute · · Score: 1

      Have you been in a Walmart? People already equate them with large scale human suffering.

      Yeah - how do you think that yellow disc is able to fly around the store knocking prices down unless the jackboot of a supervisor in some Chinese sweatshop is being pushed progressively harder onto the neck of the working comrades?

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    19. Re:Foxconn and Apple by peragrin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      That is called capitalism. workers are just a resource to be abused like any other. Why do you think it is called Human Resources?

      Really in a country where the average person doesn't have health care at all(USA) do you think worker exploitation in a foreign nation is really that shocking? 1 in 6 Americans don't have any insurance. another 2/6 have health insurance coverage so useless it is only good for emergency room visits.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    20. Re:Foxconn and Apple by timeOday · · Score: 2
      Well, let me point out one other aspect of focusing attention on Apple: it's working. These inspections and the level of attention they're getting is unprecedented. Foxconn is under scrutiny now and has to mind themselves. This is great! The workers will be somewhat better off, and gradually there will be less unfair competition for workers elsewhere. And all because the public complained, and focused their attention on a single company with a strong brand image to maintain - namely, Apple.

      .

      And what is the downside of this?

    21. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Richard.Tao · · Score: 1

      The original article called it "Apple's Plant" I changed the headline of the article to specify that it was a Foxconn facility, and the story is meant to imply that this plant in particular only produces iPads and iPhones, thus, it is an Apple plant, in a sense.
      Though good distinction, and people should realize it. I bought an Intel SSD recently and saw that it had Foxconn emblazoned on it, to which I yelled "NOOOOOO!" quite loudly upon opening.

    22. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true. Nokia's high end phones are still manufactured in Europe. They are reducing the numbers and shipping more and more to China but they still do it. So if you care about this, buy a hihg end Nokia build in Uerope and let them know why you chose them. Sure it won't matter much if one person does it but if enough people make the choice Nokia would move all manufacturing to europe (as it would then be a strategic advantage)

    23. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Apple is the richest, with the fattest margins. They could afford to manu here. They choose profit over america.

    24. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTC builds their phones in Taiwan, not China.

    25. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are rushing to defend Apple because they are the Straw Man (tm) in this scenario. It's not like we're Apple fanbois, we just like to see constructive conversations. We would much rather the conversation be focused on the legitimacy of these findings, or perhaps what it says about the Chinese working condition if Apple Foxconn is considered "above average."

    26. Re:Foxconn and Apple by bughunter · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      No, he's right. Slashdot's moderation system is indeed open to abuse by like-minded people intolerant of particular opinions, if there are enough of them.

      Many times I've been attacked, repeatedly, in comments for just mentioning I own a Macbook Pro and accused of bragging about owning one. (In fact, the thing is six years old and has needed replacement since before SCII came out). If I say anything positive about it or my preference for Apple, I get modded down to -1 faster than I can say "William Henry Gates III."

      The summary reads like a Fox News attack: Facts arise that don't reflect talking point; react by moving goalposts ("what is the acceptable norm?" implying that even, way, way above norm is not acceptable), and by misrepresentation ("Apple's plant"). Then claim "we're just reporting; you get to decide."

      People who use these BS tactics for turning bullshit into news and casting facts into doubt should automatically raise suspicions. It's a clear sign that they have drawn a conclusion and are attempting to tailor the facts to support it.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    27. Re:Foxconn and Apple by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      No one is arguing that there are not worse sweatshops out there. No on is arguing that other companies don't use said "worse sweatshops". But your complete denail that anything is wrong with the way your favorite phone company is doing business is at best self decieving and at worst contemptable. Apple is in the news for poor labor conditions. If we ignore it and say it's OK then you are just giving a green flag to any other business that wants to use sudo-slave labor to produce their product.

      ..and you don't have a better haircut than me..

      --
      once more into the breach
    28. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's a realistic world where rational people accept that farts smell like shit, not roses. Fuck off, dude.

    29. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever visited BlackBerry production line Research In Motion has in Waterloo, Ontario?

    30. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not Apple's plant.

      The FLA presumably questioned only the Foxconn employees who were involved in manufacturing for Apple, not for other companies. Foxconn operates huge facilities, with multiple floors in multiple buildings. The FLA would not necessarily have any idea what working conditions are like for employees who are not working on Apple products. Thus, calling it anything other than an evaluation of "Apple's factory" would be misleading.

    31. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Ihmhi · · Score: 0

      It is what it is, because /. is free and open to all - even shills.

      Well, for now. But now that posts can be flagged and deleted, posts or entire segments of "discussion" are liable to disappear now. Slashdot has jumped the shark.

    32. Re:Foxconn and Apple by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      APPLE is under scrutiny, not Foxconn. Everybody else is staying mum about it. Where's Microsoft coming out and saying "oh yeah, we're doing this too!" Mmm?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    33. Re:Foxconn and Apple by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      No on is arguing that other companies don't use said "worse sweatshops".

      Actually, yes they pretty much are.

      But your complete denail that anything is wrong with the way your favorite phone company is doing business is at best self decieving and at worst contemptable

      I didn't deny anything about the treatment of the Foxconn employees. The point is that you guys don't give a shit about the workers. You want to have something to bitch at Apple fanboys about. Want proof?

      If we ignore it and say it's OK ...

      Fascinating. So what started this thread? A list of other companies who are also using Foxconn. Now why would this list be interesting? So you can rake those companies over the coals, too. Who said 'let Apple get a free pass on this''? Nobody.

      It is very telling that you think it's either about roasting Apple or just being silent about it. Which... in turn leads to giving a green flag to any other businesses who use psuedo-slave labor to produce their product.

      ..and you don't have a better haircut than me.

      That's okay, I didn't say I love my phone. Though you just told me you hate mine.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    34. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Apple has actually been cited as the most proactive when it comes to monitoring work conditions in the factories they contract with.

      I believe that Apple is proactive about paying lip service to the need to do something, without actually doing anything substantive about the http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?pagewanted=all>factory explosions and suicides. See, you can have your cake and eat it too.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    35. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least I don't find programmed walmart shills all over the place trying desperately to spin walmart's evil doings into something good. I'll take walmart over apple any day

    36. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're deep in apple worship territory with this article. The mac fanboys of Kult Apple will mod up anything that praises apple and downmod anything critical of them. Don't expect sensible modding.

    37. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True enough: Western multinationals cover their lower pair of cheeks by writing in fair labor clauses into the contracts with their suppliers. This covers them against lawsuits filed in the USA from the folks on the production lines of Asia and elsewhere. However no law seems to require them to use due diligence to ensure the clauses are honored and to trigger them in the event of a breach.

      True enough: Apple is hardly the only rotten fruit in a most spoiled bunch.

    38. Re:Foxconn and Apple by icebike · · Score: 1

      You are correct, there are more than a few corporate interests here, but perhaps the fiercest and quickest to strike are the Apple enthusiasts. Mention almost anything negative about Apple in general or about specific products and you will be modded into oblivion almost instantly.

      Its like they have watcher-bots looking for posts to mod down, and they always seem to have mod points. It is so fast and complete you almost suspect they have several dozen accounts all linked by a back-channel (human or automated) to find, publish, and punish such posts. I've long suspected there are paid astroturfers out there, but of course there is no way to prove it.

      However, their mod points seem to be shallow, and given time, the rest of the /. community mods most of these posts back up to where they should be. They don't appear to have the number of accounts to hold a post down for too long.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    39. Re:Foxconn and Apple by icebike · · Score: 1

      Nobody cares what laptop you run. Really, nobody.

      You seem very quick to use the "A" word, insisting they are ATTACKED, merely because someone else posts a different opinion.
      Then you follow up with stuff like "The summary reads like a Fox News attack" and " tactics for turning bullshit into news".

      This is the internet. You've been here long enough to understand you need to grow a pair. Either that or tone down your rhetoric a little bit. That chip on your shoulder looks like a target to most people.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    40. Re:Foxconn and Apple by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true. Nokia's high end phones are still manufactured in Europe.

      No, they are assembled there.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    41. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of Samsung's phones and their batteries are made in South Korea, e.g. Galaxy Nexus, Infuse, etc.. The same is true of Samsung RAM modules, flash memory, and HDDs.

    42. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey, I live in the USA. I write software for a living.

      ONLY working 6 days a week, getting 8 hours of sleep EVERY night, eating real food rather than junk out of vending machines, having actual personal downtime. That quote horrid unquote china lifestyle sounds like a slice of heaven compared to our USA we hired you for 40 hours a week but you have to work 110+. At 112 a week that's 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, NO time off. Sure the company manual stipulates a 40 hour work week. But anyone putting in less than 110 gets sacked pretty fast. Sure you're given vacation time. But they leave out the part where you get fired if you try to take it. Out of that remaining less-than-8-hour-a-day you need to shop, eat, sleep, commute, hit the can, and, occasionally, bath. You may be dead tired, but your coworkers will not appreciate it if you skip the latter.

      Then there's the health insurance. If you're employed, you have...something. Get sick, really sick, and you get fired. If you can afford it, there's COBRA for 18 months. After that, you're up Mr. Creek. That's IF you can afford it. COBRA will cost more than a new car, a GOOD car, at a time when you don't have any income. This little game they play that lets them only insure the healthy folk.

      You'd think writing software would be an easy job. But the stress... I watch as a virus goes through the office. The folks who are unstressed, who are not constantly sleep deprived and diet-deficient. They barely get sick at all. The stressed out guys. They're on death's doorstep for weeks. That's not an exaggeration. They die. Every year a few more guys never bounce back. Eventually it's going to kill me too. A frightening thought.

      Yet what else can I do? Until the laws are changed, any place can require absurd hours. And they do. Either I suck it up, or I join the ranks of the unemployed. What are we up to now? 1-in-5 looking for work? 1-in-4? You ever try looking for work when you're chronically sleep deprived to the point of visual hallucinations?

      So forgive me if I don't cry a river for those folks in china. They've got it better than we do!

      And nobody, NOBODY, gives a shit about how poorly american white-collar workers are exploited. Nobody seems to care how many of us die.

    43. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong,

      Blackberry phones aren't made in sweatshops like that. They're not made in Asia, though some parts are sourced from Taiwan, and I think the cases are molded in China.

      Insert Blackberry hate here:

    44. Re:Foxconn and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love my iPhone, but this whole mess really has me thinking twice about my next phone. If there was another smartphone that ran IOS and had a more "ethical" factory I'd probably purchase that rather than another iPhone, even if it was a bit more (10%? 20%?).

      That's showing them. Throw a few scraps to the factory workers in the name of a fair wage for a fair day's work and call it progress.
      Or you could add another zero to the end of your suggested percentage and bring the market more in line with what a non-indentured worker would expect.

    45. Re:Foxconn and Apple by flowwolf · · Score: 1

      absolutely. this inspection was made public before it even happened. that is no way to inspect a place because you'll end up with biased results. How about we get some media coverage on surprise inspections instead of scheduled ones ? I have no doubt in my mindthat the conditions found during a scheduled inspection are skewed.

    46. Re:Foxconn and Apple by nobodie · · Score: 1

      Have you been to Walmart, in China?
      They sell cheap Chinese made crap to Chinese people who are more than happy to buy it at Chinese prices. Where exactly is the problem? Is it that Walmart ships higher quality cheap junk to the US for us to buy?

      The fabs in China also make the same products for Chinese people, they are complaining about the fabs working conditions and the deaths at the APPLE facilities. So there is a difference, it has to do with the actual worker complaints and the public's complaints in China. Paying the workers more will help, but it will also raise the prices for the end consumers who are both Chinese and Western. This will lower the value of Chinese fabs in company eyes and start a move to other countries where the people care less than the Chinese.

      (Warning: this is my usual rant following, if you have heard it before you can skip to the following comment) All of this is only to feed the consumers with cheap products that will not last very long because they are designed to fail and be replaced with more cheap crap. Labor costs are important to this equation because if the products are more expensive we will not replace them so quickly. We might even (as the Chinese do) repair them and/or buy used in preference to new. This would destroy the current consumption driven economic model. So,this model must be maintained for "economic stability."

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    47. Re:Foxconn and Apple by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      I don't know exactly, but complaining about outsourcing while you talk about abolishing the secretary of education is not it.

  2. So, the employees are literate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over three weeks, some 35,000 workers will be interviewed about 30 at a time to answer questions anonymously, entering their responses onto Apple iPads.

    They are literate and the best job available is a factory job?
    Thats worse than India

    1. Re:So, the employees are literate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are literate and the best job available is a factory job?
      Thats worse than India

      North Korea boasts one of the highest literacy rates in the world. Any idiot can get through secondary schooling, but that won't help them at all if they live in a shit country to begin with.

    2. Re:So, the employees are literate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In India, which is worse off than both China and Korea, if you are literate (secondary school pass), you can get a call center job, or a secretarial lob atleast.
      No need to slog like slaves
      If you are illiterate however, you are screwed and work in worse conditions than most of the Chinese/Korean workers

    3. Re:So, the employees are literate? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 2

      They are literate and the best job available is a factory job?
      Thats worse than India

      You expect something better than a factory job because your most marketable skill is your ability to read and write? Hate to tell you, but that rocket scientist job with NASA requires a bit more.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    4. Re:So, the employees are literate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He/She's probably a slashdotter who has difficulty reading and writing properly and complains about grammar and spelling nazis...

    5. Re:So, the employees are literate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You expect something better than a factory job because your most marketable skill is your ability to read and write? Hate to tell you, but that rocket scientist job with NASA requires a bit more.

      but not the BPO and call center jobs
      all they require is a basic understanding of English

    6. Re:So, the employees are literate? by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      In India, which is worse off than both China and Korea, if you are literate (secondary school pass), you can get a call center job, or a secretarial lob atleast.
      No need to slog like slaves

      A lot of factory work is not too hard. In Australia, if you can get a call center job with no qualification other than literacy I could pretty much guarantee I could get a factory job with ok work conditions and higher pay from doing shift work. Probably more pleasant than dealing with angry customers over the phone too.

    7. Re:So, the employees are literate? by rossdee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Hate to tell you, but that rocket scientist job with NASA requires a bit more."

      I think the rocket scientists will have to move to China if they want to keep doibng rocket science. NASA won't exist much longer.

    8. Re:So, the employees are literate? by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Rocket Scientists won't, not just because NASA isn't giving up on rockets, but because those are used by the military too. Astronauts might be SOL for a while though as we seem to be done with federally funding orbital missions and we're probably not technologically ready yet to do much else.

      Not that there's anything wrong with the changes in NASA's focus so long as they aren't used as an excuse to defund the entire organization. Government organizations like NASA are at least in part about doing the things which won't be remotely profitable for another half a century after they've been discovered, and that means setting our sights a little higher.

    9. Re:So, the employees are literate? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Korea is usually synonymous w/ South Korea, not North Korea, and the GP was talking about North Korea. In no way does India come even close to North Korea in terms of substandard living, although I do believe that the Chinese have it better. However, fact remains that in both China & India, people are less entreprenual than in the US, and the risks of starting one's own business outweigh the rewards.

      Anyway, back to the topic of literacy, if a country has more literate people than jobs for appropriate positions, one is going to see a good number of them doing sub-standard work, or leaving that country for greener pastures. Conversely, if a country has a shortage of skilled people for the jobs it requires, it will either import them from abroad - immigration - or fill it in whichever way possible w/ people who are less than qualified for such jobs. Sorta like 1999.

    10. Re:So, the employees are literate? by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 0

      You expect something better than a factory job because your most marketable skill is your ability to read and write? Hate to tell you, but that rocket scientist job with NASA requires a bit more.

      but not the BPO and call center jobs all they require is a basic understanding of English

      A Chinese could be a university profesor and still have no basic understanding of English - not to mention that working at a call center would be several steps down in his career.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
  3. No way! by Flyerman · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Is anyone actually surprised by this? Did anyone actually think they might say the factory is a pile of shit?

    1. Re:No way! by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

      Oh, dear, the fandroids have started early. I for one am very surprised about this. Apparently the conditions are very good for China, as opposed to places like clothing factories and toy factories. Which sound like hell-holes. But I digress. Down with Apple! I'd much rather buy a Motorolla or Samsung device made in the same factory!

      --
      Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
    2. Re:No way! by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The outcome was known as soon as the study was announced.

      This group is a industry created and funded "watch dog" group trotted out when any of the funding members need some independent *cough* observers to come in and put on a media show.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damned if they do, damned if they don't. Are you for real, or role playing in the popular MMO World of False Dichotomies? What do you want? The FLA to report finding a box full of baby skulls being ground up to make power buttons?

    4. Re:No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The outcome was known as soon as the study was announced.

      This group is a industry created and funded "watch dog" group trotted out when any of the funding members need some independent *cough* observers to come in and put on a media show.

      Industry needs to up its funding if it wants to receive the kind of whitewashing you're suggesting the FLA provides.

      http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-17/foxconn-auditor-finds-tons-of-issues-.html

      "The Fair Labor Association, a watchdog monitoring working conditions at makers of Apple Inc. products, has uncovered “tons of issues” that need to be addressed at a Foxconn Technology Group plant in Shenzhen, China, FLA Chief Executive Officer Auret van Heerden said."

      It seems more likely that we have two issues to address before we can draw conclusions. Is this a media frenzy, playing on confirmation bias, or is it the FLA being clumsy in how it addresses the public?

    5. Re:No way! by nahdude812 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly, the Fair Labor Association at its core is a conflict of interest. They are funded by the companies they report on. What company would pay them for bad press? If they release unfavorable reports, they lose their funding.

      Their charter has huge gaps in it, as though designed to provide companies loopholes to hide abuse. The biggest and most glaring example is that member companies are required to disclose only some factory locations. Meaning companies can create facade factories for inspection, while the real work continues to be done behind closed doors.

      Even still they don't live up to their own chartered requirements with respect to transparency and accountability. There are supposed to be regular reports on factory conditions for all member companies. There are supposed to be reports on factory locations for all member companies. When abuses are found, the company is supposed to be named and remediation steps disclosed. The FLA has one report more recent than 6 years old on their site. That one relatively recent report (August 2010) is full of abuses across multiple manufacturers, including people who believe they are "always" expected to work for "more than 72 hours in a week" and for "more than 24 days in a row," and that they were not free to refuse overtime without repercussions. Those were the top measured tier in each of those categories. None of the manufacturers were named, and no remediation steps are outlined. Thus making the report completely toothless since there is no accountability and no attempt to repair the problems.

      Apple opened up 90% of their factories for inspection. That's pretty good if accurate, it'd be hard to maintain a 90% facade. But they joined the FLA a month ago, FoxConn undoubtedly saw that there would be inspections coming through, and a month is more than enough time to clean up their act for inspection purposes. They also undoubtedly made it known to their workers that if they lose this Apple contract, those workers will be out of a job (and they really will be, nobody else will absorb that excess manufacturing capacity). So this inspection is easily whitewashed, and the workers will easily give glowing testimony so they retain their jobs. Also, wasn't it just a few days ago that they announced the inspections were going to start? They really thoroughly inspected all these factories in just a few days? Amazing!

      So what exactly is this inspection supposed to prove? Plenty of time to prepare, workers who know if the inspection goes wrong that they'll lose their jobs, and a whirlwind tour of the factories by a sham organization. This is a token, "We got our hand slapped, let's make puppy eyes at the media," publicity stunt.

    6. Re:No way! by icebike · · Score: 1

      s this a media frenzy, playing on confirmation bias, or is it the FLA being clumsy in how it addresses the public?

      When you read the entire story to which you linked, (instead of cherry picking one quote), you will find the the "tons of issues" are probably related to the brand of soap in the lavatory dispensers, because everything else in the report is absolutely glowing.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  4. What, already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They inspected them for less than a week.

    Yeah, alright. That's one swell job you guys have done.

    How about some surprise inspections over the course of the next 6 months at least?

    1. Re:What, already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot. It's reporting 'news' from 3 fucking days ago because the editors gave up the freshness war a long time ago. This is something the guy said just as the inspections were kicking off. It's been attributed to prior experience with Foxconn and Apple.

    2. Re:What, already? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Apple's membership into FLA means that their suppliers will get surprise inspections in the future.

  5. Doesn't matter by slimjim8094 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I make no judgement on these factories. I have no doubt that I'd never, ever work in one, or let anyone I cared about work in one. At the same time, I'm not convinced they're not a big step up for the average Chinese person. Remember your history lessons? In this country (USA), we know something about horrible working conditions. Foxconn doesn't sound as bad as Triangle Shirtwaist Company, or any of the mine towns with the company store and wage-slavery. And people voluntarily went there just as people are voluntarily working at Foxconn.

    The average work conditions have a lot to do with the environment. Sustenance farming was pretty miserable - is still pretty miserable, it's still around. There are still a huge number of people who would work in terrible conditions just for the privilege of a steady source of food (as opposed to fickle harvests).

    This isn't to say we should get complacent - the moment we as a people declare the status quo "good enough", we've lost.

    Having said that, there's a lot of people (many who will be posting in this article, I'm sure) that are convinced these factories are some sort of prison with forced-labor and the evil specter of Steve Jobs himself whipping workers until they're forced to jump. And that seems less productive than, you know, thinking.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:Doesn't matter by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      ... these factories are some sort of prison with forced-labor and the evil specter of Steve Jobs himself whipping workers ...

      I have never seen that S&M porn site. Are the workers cute naked chicks, rubbing iPhones and iPads over their well-oiled bodies during production? Please post a link.

      Actually, a whip-wielding Steve Jobs video clip would be a good screen saver app. I don't think the Apple iPhone Store folks would let it in, though.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Doesn't matter by skine · · Score: 0

      I'll agree with you that they could be suffering even worse working conditions. However, as you've already admitted, they could easily be better.

      The problem with focusing on the fact that they are better than they could be is that you can justify practically any working conditions, so long as you can imagine something that's worse.

      Instead, why not ask whether these working conditions are acceptable, or whether it's acceptable for the US to allow our companies to use factories with labor conditions that would be considered unacceptable if they operated within the US?

      Personally, this article doesn't make me feel better about the conditions that the Foxconn workers endure on a daily basis. Rather, it makes it even more obvious that we need to answer the questions above.

    3. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because the working conditions are "better" than most in that country, that doesn't mean they're good.
      Nobody is forcing them to work there, but you're totally missing the point. These investigations aren't made to close factories, and make jobless people, they're to improve working conditions, because, regardless what you might think those workers are people, just like the workers from the western states.

      Besides, there's one thing that everyone seems to forget, China is a communist country, a totalitarian regime. Whatever Foxconn might say or do, it's because some government official dictates them to do it.

      Taking things out of context, will put them in a different light, but won't change them.

    4. Re:Doesn't matter by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      The average work conditions have a lot to do with the environment. Sustenance farming was pretty miserable - is still pretty miserable, it's still around. There are still a huge number of people who would work in terrible conditions just for the privilege of a steady source of food (as opposed to fickle harvests).

      None so terrible a condition as those who work in the butchering of others. Have a guess as to what you might taste like, then consider than some farmers need not farm at all if they only decide to live off the fat of the land.

    5. Re:Doesn't matter by Tom · · Score: 2

      This isn't to say we should get complacent - the moment we as a people declare the status quo "good enough", we've lost.

      Misery follows if you are unable to follow the status quo as "good enough for now".

      Nobody said this would be the status quo forever. But change takes time, and the faster you move something big, the more friction you create. And if you move a country too fast, you can destroy it. Unrest, civil war, massive unemployment, runaway inflation, etc. etc.

      It's easy to talk about change on /. - when you are responsible for more than a billion people, you ought to be a lot more careful.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:Doesn't matter by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Foxconn doesn't sound as bad as Triangle Shirtwaist Company, or any of the mine towns with the company store and wage-slavery. And people voluntarily went there just as people are voluntarily working at Foxconn.

      For having family in mining towns, and being two generations from one myself(on both sides), I'd say that Foxconn is worse. In mining towns of today, I'm not followed by representatives of the mining company's security company for entering the town, lawyers can openly practice against the mining company without fear of death or intimidation, the mining company isn't going to prosecute people that talk about their company, and people can buy things without having to be indebted to the company (such as with Foxconn).

      The worst practices by mining companies in the US are saintly in comparison to any company operating in the People's Republic of China. That, and people in those mining towns are treated with a lot more respect.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    7. Re:Doesn't matter by Rockoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with focusing on the fact that they are better than they could be is that you can justify practically any working conditions, so long as you can imagine something that's worse.

      Ah, but what are the important things to focus on? This is the slashdot fail. The important figure to focus on is China's wealth. Its GDP/Capita.

      Its really easy to sit here in one of the richest nations on earth and criticize a nation that has 1/10th the wealth per capita as America, and criticize them for not having the conditions that are only available in wealthy nations.. its easy as long as we completely ignore how fucking poor China is. Thats why none of the critics ever touch upon the subject of how poor the country is, but they instead appeal to emotions about "terrible working conditions" and other bullshit.

      The people of China need these factories in order to increase the wealth of the entire nation. The primary enemy of mankind is poverty. The number one killer of humans is poverty. How dare anyone sit in judgment of China for trying to better the lives of its people through wealth creation. If you want to judge the government for its assaults on freedom thats great.. but to judge the country because the people want a better life and are doing the same shit we did to make better lives for ourselves.. its bullshit... tired old dogmatic bullshit.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    8. Re:Doesn't matter by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Mining towns to today don't have any bearing on the argument. The concern is what happened 50-75-100 years ago here in relation to China today.

      Unless, of course, you want to say that the natural evolution is for better workplace safety and rights over time.

    9. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make no judgement on these factories. I have no doubt that I'd never, ever work in one, or let anyone I cared about work in one.

      what an arrogant and elitist thing to say. the world isnt a soap opera, for some people work at foxconn is a huge step up from wherever they were.

      remember, most anywhere in the real world but usa you dont work you dont meal. that tends to set priorities straight very quickly.

    10. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can attack any working conditions so long as you can imagine something that's better.

      Which is pretty much why the US, or any other country, shouldn't be dictating what labor conditions are acceptable outside their own borders. Because conditions that are unacceptable in the US are unacceptable due to cultural views and the fact that we can generally afford to quash those practices. This is not true of other countries around the world. Like it or lump it, other places are subject to other, sometimes much more harsh, constraints.

      "Oh. These are unacceptable working conditions. We can't permit any business with you" ... The workers will love you, because they'll have to get shittier jobs for less pay. Or, perhaps, go back to scratching out some existence spending every day raising all their own food. Since they don't have any income with which to buy food, thanks to the smug self-righteousness with which plenty of relatively well off people are willing to declare something is too abusive.

      The only people in a position to know are the people who are.. y'know.. working there. You want me to care about what some group thinks is unacceptable? Great, that group can go work in those factories for a couple of years. At that point, I'll figure you've actually endured, experienced, and are qualified to make a judgement. Until then, advocacy not judgement thanks. Private advocacy even; leave the public funds out of it.

    11. Re:Doesn't matter by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      have no doubt that I'd never, ever work in one, or let anyone I cared about work in one. At the same time, I'm not convinced they're not a big step up for the average Chinese person.

      That is easily one of the most racist statements I've read today. It's OK because they are Chinese?
      Are Chinese so much a lesser person that what would be horrible working conditions to you should be just fine for them?
      ...get with the twentieth century pal, we left that mentality a hundred years ago.

      --
      once more into the breach
    12. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nobody said this would be the status quo forever. But change takes time, and the faster you move something big, the more friction you create. And if you move a country too fast, you can destroy it. Unrest, civil war, massive unemployment, runaway inflation, etc. etc."

      Yeah you wouldn't want to provide too many cheap, Chinese laborers with too many rights and worker protections at an appreciable rate. That'd lead to mass unemployment and hyperinflation, completely and utterly destroying the country.

    13. Re:Doesn't matter by slimjim8094 · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry you think so. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt by assuming I was less than clear, although I thought what I meant was quite obvious.

      The average Chinese person has horrendous working conditions - sustenance farming, or not much more. Do you seriously not see how working in a factory with (mostly) regular hours and a steady source of food wouldn't be a big improvement? The analogy is the industrial revolution that happened in the West - sure, those sweatshops and factories with little kids running the machines were horrible, but the fact remains that they were a big step up from sustenance farming or craft work that they had come from. Because you could go home at 5 with a paycheck, then use that to be guaranteed food - not hoping there weren't any droughts or blights. The little kids were already working and losing fingers - in the fields. And not even the factories had the guts to make you work on the Lord's day, so you had a day off - something that wasn't really a given if the crop had to come in.

      Horrible? Yes. Marginally less horrible than where they'd come from? Yes. You can romanticize farming all you want, but it doesn't make it a fun thing to live off of. It's not a race thing, it's a societal thing. We moved past it, the Chinese are moving through it - partly because they started later, and partly because they've got a lot more people. It would be better to wave a magic wand and give everybody everywhere nice working conditions and comfortable lives... but I don't think that's really feasible.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    14. Re:Doesn't matter by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      You would have to go back past the 1930's to get a comparison that is like China.

      As for China(and like minded places) bringing better workplace safety rights, they're doing everything to ensure meaningful progress never happens. This means that workers are forever subordinated to the business, with the pre-FDR era tradition of disrespect.

      Businesses would rather be able to extend the concept of "business friendliness" as extreme as they can, and measure that as competitiveness.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    15. Re:Doesn't matter by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Which is pretty much why the US, or any other country, shouldn't be dictating what labor conditions are acceptable outside their own borders. Because conditions that are unacceptable in the US are unacceptable due to cultural views and the fact that we can generally afford to quash those practices. This is not true of other countries around the world. Like it or lump it, other places are subject to other, sometimes much more harsh, constraints.

      Doesn't matter. Slavery is something that is unacceptable if one wishes to participate in the civilized world, no matter the cultural justification.

      "Oh. These are unacceptable working conditions. We can't permit any business with you" ... The workers will love you, because they'll have to get shittier jobs for less pay. Or, perhaps, go back to scratching out some existence spending every day raising all their own food. Since they don't have any income with which to buy food, thanks to the smug self-righteousness with which plenty of relatively well off people are willing to declare something is too abusive.

      Or the factories could treat their workers with a level of respect known in the First World.

      At that point, I'll figure you've actually endured, experienced, and are qualified to make a judgement. Until then, advocacy not judgement thanks. Private advocacy even; leave the public funds out of it.

      Those are words spoken by apologists - as "you don't understand" is a well-known PRC bromide used to quell argument. The First World understands quite well from their own history that Foxconn is doing something unacceptable. I wouldn't be surprised if you are one of those folks paid to guide opinion by the PRC.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    16. Re:Doesn't matter by Tom · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot, and a dangerous one at that.

      The last time someone rapidly changed China, an estimated fourty million people died. It is a massive country. It has five times the population of the USA. In case anything goes seriously wrong, a million or so civilian casualties could easily happen.

      The workers getting their labor rights a few years later is an acceptable price to pay for a million lives in my book.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  6. Don't be fooled by the title. by mosb1000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This article doesn't present any findings, and it's pretty clear the FLA in being interviewed only meant to explain who they are and how they will be investigating the working conditions at Apple's suppliers. The thing about working conditions is just a sound bite, no doubt taken out of context, to draw readers to what is really a pretty boring article.

  7. So which report do we believe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:So which report do we believe? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Believe the one with the issues. Seems to me that even the best factory in the world would have problems during the crunch mode just before a major product launch.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  8. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by mariasama16 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The Fair Labor Association found that Apple's plant where iPhones and iPads are far better than those at garment factories or other facilities elsewhere in the country. A quote: 'The lead investigator stated "The facilities are first-class; the physical conditions are way, way above average of the norm."' Which leaves the question, what is the acceptable norm?"

    Translation: So the manacles are in better condition, they're punished with lifetime imprisonment versus death in other places, and the slaves are kept in slightly better conditions - but are still slaves given that one risks imprisonment or death if you speak out against Foxconn or the like.

    So this organization is only a whitewash group for Apple.

    Not so. /. has the older story of the initial impressions by the FLA. The new one today (reported on by Bloomberg), instead says:

    “We’re finding tons of issues,” van Heerden said en route to a meeting where FLA inspectors were scheduled to present preliminary findings to Foxconn management. “I believe we’re going to see some very significant announcements in the near future.”

    Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-17/foxconn-auditor-finds-tons-of-issues-.html

  9. Contradictory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-17/foxconn-auditor-finds-tons-of-issues-.html?cmpid=sfc

    How does that jive?

    1. Re:Contradictory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that jive?

      If you don't apply the same standard to both statements. "Way above average of the norm" in terms of what a Chinese manufacturer is doing probably still leaves plenty of ground for the rest of us to find something wrong.

  10. Perspective, People by tsj5j · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most people commenting about Foxconn have lost all perspective because they allow themselves to be blinded by Apple hate.

    Let me explain why bashing Apple and Foxconn about this is so, so foolish.

    1.) Poorer working conditions aren't exclusive to Apple's factories, or even Foxconn.
    If you're trying to uphold your ideal working conditions on workers who create products you use, please take a step back and stop buying any product from any store. I can confidently tell you that all the products you use: your computer, tech gadgets, electronics, shoes, clothes, etc. are all made by workers in poor conditions, often even poorer than that of Foxconn. Instead of protesting against Apple/Foxconn, vote with your wallet instead of bitching in an online forum and feeling self-righteous after doing so.

    2.) Workers are -happy- about their job and working conditions. It's you who feel unhappy about them.
    Many workers are happy about their job and working conditions, in Foxconn and other such factories. These factories provide a lot of things (not just money) that they would never be able to dream of: a shelter over their head, varied meals, water, electricity, and more. Many of these people are uneducated and would be jobless otherwise. They need and are happy about these jobs. Your protesting will NOT IMPROVE THEIR LIVES. You will render them jobless (as you boycott these products and companies pull out of these countries) and effectively kill off their means of living.

    3.) Progress takes time.
    Most Americans have forgotten their past when there were still slaves, often in FAR worse conditions than that of China. It's been proven that a country needs time to develop, and attempting to shortcut the process will lead to disastrous results. 10 years ago, these people whom you claim to be working in "poor conditions" were starving because a drought wiped out their crops. Their lives have improved, and will improve as long as they have jobs.

    1. Re:Perspective, People by molog · · Score: 2

      It still remains that the work conditions would be illegal were they done in the United States, and absolutely all of Europe. They are a step up over lots of shops in that country, but that doesn't change the fact that the hours the employees work, the benefits, and overall conditions are not acceptable. So they are the best of a crumy lot. I have the firm belief that any product that is sold in this country, I mean the US, must have been produced in working conditions that are of the same, or better, as mandated here in the states. And that includes work hours.

      --
      So Linus, what are we going to do tonight?
      The same thing we do every night Tux. Try to take over the world!
    2. Re:Perspective, People by WaywardGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The John Stewart show that started this whole thing stated some pretty ugly figures about suicide rates. Workers get a bunk in a small room with seven other workers they don't even know. Around high places where you could jump to your death, they've installed nets to catch jumpers. If you talk to other employees about forming a group to negotiate for better wages or working conditions, you get 12 years in jail.

      China has people to spare, and not enough resources to go around. That's one reason why labor is cheap and may remain that way for generations. Here in the US, we have resources to burn but not enough people to make use of them. That's one reason labor here is expensive, and why some politicians want to make children of illegal immigrants non-citizens: this would create a whole new class of non-Americans, living for generations in the US with no rights, ripe for exploitation as cheap labor, just like their illegal immigrant ancestors. We're not alone in the world in wanting a large population of near slave laborers to do the hard work for us (seen any Americans picking strawberries lately?). Qatar, for example, allows citizens to "sponsor" foreign workers, who once in the country aren't even allowed to leave without their employer's permission, or change jobs or complain about working conditions or wages... Remember all those black Africans trapped in Libya when war broke out? This is typical of what happens around the world when bad governments allow exploitation of the weak.

      If we can make a small difference through educating Americans about working conditions in the factories where our stuff is made, I think it's an effort well worth pursuing.

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    3. Re:Perspective, People by Ardeaem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1.) Poorer working conditions aren't exclusive to Apple's factories, or even Foxconn.

      Irrelevant. "Joe may have killed someone, but Frank did too, so don't complain about Joe!" Being inconsistent in your calls for better treatment is much better than never calling for better treatment at all.

      2.) Workers are -happy- about their job and working conditions. It's you who feel unhappy about them. Your protesting will NOT IMPROVE THEIR LIVES. You will render them jobless (as you boycott these products and companies pull out of these countries) and effectively kill off their means of living.

      The whole point of exerting economic pressure through a boycott is to make it reasonable for a company to change their behavior to get you to buy their products again. Nobody, including people protesting, want to put anyone out of business. Also, and you might be surprised by this, but China is an authoritarian country. There can be dire consequences for protesting, and so you think they are happy, but really, they are forced by the government to be "content" with their lot. We know that conditions at Foxconn's factories have been bad in the past. There's no sense in saying "Oh, but those Chinese, their HAPPY about it!"

      3.) Progress takes time. Most Americans have forgotten their past when there were still slaves, often in FAR worse conditions than that of China.

      Time is not the cause of anything. Progress takes time, but that's because there's stuff that happens in time, like protests, political pressure, inspections, etc. You think slavery just ceased to exist because we gave it enough time? That shows a tremendous lack of historical understanding.

    4. Re:Perspective, People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure I remember reading they were committing suicide because their life insurance had such a good payout, and it would have been better for their families to do so. That was a while back now, I think I remember reading another story suggesting they were changing the policy such that they didn't get paid for suicides or something and that stopped quite a bit of them.

    5. Re:Perspective, People by hawguy · · Score: 2

      If we can make a small difference through educating Americans about working conditions in the factories where our stuff is made, I think it's an effort well worth pursuing.

      But when manufacturing costs rise in China, that just means that the jobs will move to a country where workers cheaper and the Chinese factory workers will move from crappy factory jobs to no jobs at all. Which is worse?

      Though I guess I can't think of any other country where wages are cheaper while still having the infrastructure to support factories.

    6. Re:Perspective, People by martin-boundary · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You make an extremely important argument.

      The work that gets done now in China for Apple (or the other tech giants) used to be done in America, under American labor laws. Then the jobs moved to China, but they are equivalent jobs for American markets, so they should still be done under American labor laws.

      Of course China has different laws, but American money from American consumers who pay for nominally American products should always get products made under American labor laws, regardless.

      That leaves only two moral choices: either Chinese factories must raise their standards to American standards ASAP, or else Apple needs to be penalized (in America) for not following American labor laws while producing nominally American products.

    7. Re:Perspective, People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >2.) Workers are -happy- about their job and working conditions. It's you who feel unhappy about them.

      Yeah, and they happily commit suicide. Probably other workers also commit suicide, but this is what we hear about.

    8. Re:Perspective, People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the saying goes - there's none so blind as them that will not see.

    9. Re:Perspective, People by Dupple · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well they don't keep committing suicide. As fas as I know you can only do it once.

      The potential suicides were at the Microsoft part of the plant - and I'm not even sure they jumped

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/01/11/foxconn_mass_suicide/

      --
      Watch those corners
    10. Re:Perspective, People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many iPhones are sold in America? I suspect tha China is already a bigger market than USA for Apple.
      http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2012/01/iphone-sales-in-china-could-jump-500-in-coming-years-analyst-says.html

    11. Re:Perspective, People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is you who are being dishonest. The suicide rate for foxconn workers is lower than that of China on average.

    12. Re:Perspective, People by u38cg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And in the meantime the children of the third world can go die on a rubbish dump? Fuck you.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    13. Re:Perspective, People by outsider007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you think the "John Stewart show" started this whole thing, then you too are part of the problem. This kind of pervasive ignorance of how the world works only happens in America.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    14. Re:Perspective, People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) You are right that Apple isn't the only one responsible, but Apple has the money to make a difference. Just because you buy only the stuff that's made under horrible circumstances, doesn't mean we all do, so stop talking as if we all are like you. I'll give you one example (but there are plenty more). In The Netherlands all major stores agreed to stop selling cheap chocolate letters for Sinterklaas and have them all agree they would only sell chocolate letters from fair trade chocolate. http://www.oxfamnovib.nl/pure-chocolade.html
      Don't forget that companies like Nike and Adidas have been pressured to keep an eye on their factories, so campaigning can make a difference.

      2) You sound like factory owner from a hundred years ago. It has been a hard struggle to form unions and improve the circumstances for the people in factories. Our protesting can actually improve their lives, but the growth of China might slow down a bit. There's no real need for China to grow like crazy, no matter what the human cost.

      3) Progress takes time, but that doesn't mean that they have to make the same mistakes again. When the industrial revolution started, we didn't have any examples and we didn't know where we were heading, or where we wanted to go. I would assume the Chinese could have looked abroad and see examples and know where they want to go. Their lives have improved from a money point a view, but are they really happier now? Judging from the people that jumped from the roofs, it's not so clear. When people die because of natural disaster, that's very sad. When people die because of suicide, I think there's something wrong.

    15. Re:Perspective, People by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      It still remains that the work conditions would be illegal were they done in the United States, and absolutely all of Europe.

      What exactly is happening at Foxconn that wouldn't happen in the USA or in Europe? I mean not just wild accusations. And not asking about "what would be illegal", but "what would not be happening".

      PS. If you say "working 60 hours a week" - I've done that. If you say "employing people below legal age" - I've been employed by one of the largest US companies while below the legal age.

    16. Re:Perspective, People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be interesting to be able to gauge the true reaction of people to the conditions of these Chinese factory workers vs. starving African's... one might say that the Chinese live relatively well.

      We're a technology biased group, and I'd guess that the vast majority of us are staring down the barrel of the Chinese labor machine, both skilled and unskilled. Globalization was a tease... it enabled our jobs, but then started to take them away...

      My job was created about 10 years ago. Today, there is no way that my company would choose to hire a US engineer for my position, it would be Chinese, or at least Taiwanese, and I can say that with 100% confidence because we are cutting US workforce and expanding Asian. So here I am, faced with extinction of my position, potentially I don't even have it as well as these Chinese--a job to do, a place to stay, meals to eat... thousands of others like me in the US and other western parts of the world are faced with the same thing, our middle class existence is tenuous, just a few job shifts away... and when the inevitable hammer does fall, we know we're all competing for a smaller and smaller job pool hoping for less and less young people to come into the field, more older people to stop working, and our peers to give it all up in favor or anything else.

      So yes, it stands to reason that most of us would hate the system that enables our inexpensive replacements and would place more focus and harsher judgement on the Chinese situation.

    17. Re:Perspective, People by danaris · · Score: 1

      That leaves only two moral choices: either Chinese factories must raise their standards to American standards ASAP, or else nearly every single company that sells a product in America needs to be penalized (in America) for not following American labor laws while producing nominally American products.

      Fixed that for you.

      I mean, seriously, what is with the focus on Apple, when every single reputable report shows that Apple is among the very best when it comes to how they get people treated at the factories producing their stuff?

      And honestly, I wouldn't mind too much (though admittedly I don't fully grasp the economics and practicalities of it) if penalties of this sort were applied fairly and reasonably to American companies who have their products produced in factories that adhere to standards lower than what would be legal in America. That would lead pretty quickly to improvement of conditions in China, to the extent that such is possible there.

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    18. Re:Perspective, People by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The potential suicides were at the Microsoft part of the plant -

      Oh, actually everything makes sense now.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    19. Re:Perspective, People by tsj5j · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant. "Joe may have killed someone, but Frank did too, so don't complain about Joe!" Being inconsistent in your calls for better treatment is much better than never calling for better treatment at all.

      It's not irrelevant at all. Focusing all the attention on one company isn't going to do anyone any good. For one, the focus becomes on the company and not the workers. It attracts all the haters who prefer to focus their attention on "how apple is doing bad" and not "how we can make this better". Frankly, I've not seen a thoughtful solution here besides "Boycott Apple!". How about an organization that promotes/advertises/labels products which are made with fair labor?

      The whole point of exerting economic pressure through a boycott is to make it reasonable for a company to change their behavior to get you to buy their products again. Nobody, including people protesting, want to put anyone out of business. Also, and you might be surprised by this, but China is an authoritarian country. There can be dire consequences for protesting, and so you think they are happy, but really, they are forced by the government to be "content" with their lot. We know that conditions at Foxconn's factories have been bad in the past. There's no sense in saying "Oh, but those Chinese, their HAPPY about it!"

      You're assuming a lot of things without any evidence.

      a.) Nobody, including people protesting, want to put anyone out of business.
      REALLY? Because any intelligent onlooker will know how this ends. Either Apple/China/Foxconn will do nothing except some basic PR, or Apple decides Foxconn's suicides are too costly and moves to another third-world factory. So yes, you may not "want it" but that's going to happen in reality.

      b.) They're "forced to be content"? Have you even met a significant number of people from China? They're GRATEFUL for the opportunity to work, because they have never had so much as a stable job before. Many of these factory workers are funding their children's education. That's the China Dream, to give their children the opportunity they never had. They're not going to fulfill that dream if they're homeless on the street or working on a farm.

      (This might sound like a pro-China shill, but seriously, change your perspective. You'll probably never understand how much they prefer working in a factory than sleeping in the streets/farming.)

      Time is not the cause of anything. Progress takes time, but that's because there's stuff that happens in time, like protests, political pressure, inspections, etc. You think slavery just ceased to exist because we gave it enough time? That shows a tremendous lack of historical understanding.

      Strawman. I never said Time was the SOLE cause of anything, which is what you are implying above.
      Time is needed, given their current growth trajectory, to grow wealth as a nation and allow their people to accumulate wealth, to pass on to their children, who will eventually climb the social-economic class through education. This takes time in terms of generations. Just as in the US, the minorities accumulated wealth and had more education opportunities over time, allowing them to improve their standard of living. Trying to act as a global gatekeeper and short circuiting this process is an exercise in futility.

    20. Re:Perspective, People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Workers are -happy- about their job and working conditions"

      Says who?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn_suicides

      Foxconn Installs Anti-Suicide Nets at Its Facilities
      http://www.dailytech.com/Foxconn+Installs+AntiSuicide+Nets+at+Its+Facilities/article18877.htm

      And no, you can't compare Foxconn suicide rate with the general populaiton suicide rate because the composition of both groups is very different.

      "Your protesting will NOT IMPROVE THEIR LIVES."

      Like how protesting, strikes, blood, sweat and tears by the Labor Movement did not improve people's lives?

      The non-powerfull (aka laborers) have to stand up for one another - even across borders, or they (we) will be overrun by the powerful. MLK knew this, and historically that strategy has been proven to be effective.

    21. Re:Perspective, People by tsj5j · · Score: 1

      Your government will never do that.

      You can't just penalize Apple, you literally have to penalize every company producing something that is more than a few components.
      It's not just assembly that's made of cheap labor: from resource extraction, to the production of individual components, to assembly, that exploits cheap labor.
      America as a whole will lose competitiveness if this was applied, as believe me, no other country will be foolhardy enough to follow.

      If you thought the economy/job market was bad, try checking after this regulation is passed.
      Companies will literally FLEE overseas.

    22. Re:Perspective, People by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      Oh, my freaking god.. someone gets it!!!
      Bravo.. my dear man bravo.. (hands clapping)..

      --
      once more into the breach
    23. Re:Perspective, People by twistofsin · · Score: 1

      Refusing citizenship to the children of immigrants will not create the cheap labor pool that you have imagined. Their parents are happy to work 50-60 hours a week for min wage or less while housing 8 people in a 1-2 bedroom apt because they have first hand experience with a much worse standard of living.

      Their children however are going to be raised amongst (relatively) wealthy Americans, and if they are denied even the opportunity to be a middle class citizen they will retaliate. They will not be content to pick our fruit, dig our ditches and prune our gardens.

    24. Re:Perspective, People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The John Stewart show that started this whole thing stated some pretty ugly figures about suicide rates. ... Around high places where you could jump to your death, they've installed nets to catch jumpers.

      Look up the suicide rate per million of Foxconn employees. Look up the suicide rate per million of Chinese in general. Look up the suicide rate per million of Americans in general.

      Two of those three suicide rates are "ugly figures" and I bet you'll be surprised to see which ones. In fact, it's several orders of magnitude worse than the lowest rate of those three...

      As for nets, many buildings in the US (not to mention most countries of the world...) have suicide nets. Why is it such a big deal that Foxconn has them when most major locations in the US have them? Heck, here's an article about the Golden Gate bridge getting a suicide net.

      http://articles.latimes.com/2008/oct/11/local/me-goldengate11

      How about you worry about Americans, who clearly have a larger suicide problem than Foxconn's workers?

    25. Re:Perspective, People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen you commie, here in America we don't roll that way.
      If the boss is going to be a prick, we going down the Smith and Wesson way, and take bastards down with us.

    26. Re:Perspective, People by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Thanks for explaining. What you explained to me is that you are an Apple apologist without a moral bone in your body.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    27. Re:Perspective, People by WaywardGeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have to believe this guy is going for those Chinese government dollars that they give posters for pro-Chinese posts. How much do you think he just made? $0.25?

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
  11. White Opinions on Taiwanese Factory in Guangdong by retroworks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have been there. This factory is way beyond garment factories in terms of attractiveness. The Shenzhen campus, which has about 600k employees, makes not just Apple but HTC, Sony, Panasonic, you-name-it. They are owned by Taiwan, employ management from Hong Kong, employ Cantonese labor , and are governed by Mandarin communist party staff. They are ISO certified. There are so many reasons to run this factory right, it's kind of surprising that activists who are really concerned would pick on a factory like this in the first place, as opposed to say the garment industry in Guangdong. http://www.greenpeace.org/eastasia/press/releases/toxics/2010/textile-industrial-pollution/ My theory is that White People have their own "ju ju" words. Like Cameroonians who are scared to death of owls, environmentalists have an exaggerated sense of risk when something is technological and involves anything with toxics. A lot of cognitive risk dissonance over high tech and brown people. Personally, I think it's kind of cool that the Taiwanese, Hong Kong, Japanese, Communists, etc. get along here and run a factory that produces the coolest gadgets ever produced by humans. At the rate they have grown, I'm sure the auditor will find lots of violations. But the headline is accurate... the auditor knows within a few hours that they are NOT in the textile hell-hole up the river, or the smelter, or the copper mine.

    --
    Gently reply
  12. Labor by Fri13 · · Score: 2

    Everything has been better when trade unions existed and they had power and really were protecting labors rights.
    And that is socialism. But after the capitalism came, they have been hunted down or limited their power so corporations can rip everyone off as much as they want and because competition the products quality has gone down as well while amount of workers kept minimum.

    In China, so many such strong trade unions did not exist. And same problem is on many other countries, so no wonder capitalistic corporations goes where they can hijack peoples rights and possibilities better.

    1. Re:Labor by u38cg · · Score: 2
      *really?* I remember what industry used to look like - in the first world - back in the heyday of the trade union. Health and safety didn't exist. Good luck if you were black, or Jewish, or gay, or female. If you fell out with the union rep, you were on your own. And in the meantime, you were being tapped for union dues that went to fund a party espousing some of the most fucked-up economic policies the UK ever saw.

      What creates better conditions for workers is economic progress, so that workers don't have to go and work in a paper mill where they lose fingers as a matter of routine, or a shipyard where workers fell from gantries every week.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  13. Can we check our sources, please? by j_f_chamblee · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Reuters article is just one of a couple following the F.L.A.'s inspection of the Foxconn Plant. There is a slightly longer, but much more critical article by the New York Times. Looks as if /. editor's are doing is some editorializing of their own, too. From the "what-is-the-right-question" department, eh? How about from the "now-we-are-shilling-for-apple" department?

    --
    The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool. -Richard Feynman
    1. Re:Can we check our sources, please? by arose · · Score: 1

      “I was very surprised when I walked onto the floor at Foxconn, how tranquil it is compared with a garment factory,” Mr. van Heerden said, according to the Reuters report.

      You would expect that in a place where things are assembled completely by hand and the employees aren't allowed to talk. Whether that makes it a good environment is a different question.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  14. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by jamesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So this organization is only a whitewash group for Apple.

    It may turn out that that is the case, but if the only evidence you have is "I don't like their findings" then you might as well be talking about the fairies at the bottom of the garden.

    Feel free to post evidence...

  15. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by WaywardGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If any of them talk to each other about the possibility of starting a union, they serve 12 years in jail. I heard this from the source that started this whole Apple Foxconn thing... the John Stewart show. The reason we're picking on Apple is because John picked on Apple, and because they really do have the margins to increase worker wages, unlike say Dell or HP. Actually, it was a terrific show, one of the best he's done, IMO. The whole point was of course bashing Republicans on the campaign trail as usual. This time he was highlighting the common theme about making America a more "business friendly" place for corporations, something Mitt talks a lot about. So, he said let's take a look at the world's most business friendly economy - China! His point was if you take the business friendly logic to it's natural extreme, you wind up with a near dictatorship oppressing the people for the good of big business.

    --
    Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
  16. Mike Daisey in China, talking about working life by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/454/mr-daisey-and-the-apple-factory
    An on topic story of working, the factory, what you can have made and the reality of the production lines .
    Many cheap hands are cheaper than robots.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  17. All the workers are happy... by outsider007 · · Score: 1

    Because all the unhappy ones are dead :(

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    1. Re:All the workers are happy... by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Or they're imprisoned.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  18. Suicide nets vs. suicide booths? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of these options is painless, which one did Foxconn choose?

    1. Re:Suicide nets vs. suicide booths? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Suicide vans.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  19. Re:Mike Daisey in China, talking about working lif by retroworks · · Score: 2

    But why then is Foxconn converting to robots? REUTERS "Foxconn to rely more on robots; could use 1 million in 3 years" http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/01/us-foxconn-robots-idUSTRE77016B20110801

    --
    Gently reply
  20. Re:White Opinions on Taiwanese Factory in Guangdon by superflit · · Score: 1

    No.... That is not the reason they pick apple to slur...

    The real reason is because the 'labor' people and NGO will start to CHARGE apple and others to have some 'certification'.

    It is like a Mafia....

    'If you do not pay us....people will think bad things about you....'

    That is the main reason...

    Not that they care about someone in a third world country.

  21. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    Naturally I say something bad about Apple, and someone modbombs it. My point was that Foxconn is a lesser evil - in that they only practice a subset of the things other factories would put upon their workers. Despite this, Foxconn still treats their workers with disrespect and distrust; going against the company is lifetime-shortening move as opposed to a career limiting move in the places that formerly did such work (e.g. the US).

    One can find a ton of issues but they get swept under the rug when it comes to the final report.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  22. Re:This article is for Apple-haters by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's little of substance to the story. It was posted so that Apple haters could rush in, out of breath, and bash Apple for "slave labor" and other goofy crap. Slashdot is a Google/Linux advocacy site, and Apple is one of their competitors.

    I don't get how this is an article for Apple haters? An independent organization said that workers at factories that Appler uses have better working conditions than other factories and that the worst problem employees there face is boredom. How is that anti-Apple? I'm no Apple fan-boy, but the article validated what I thought all along - that working conditions in Apple's factories are no worse and probably better than in other factories.

  23. turd sniffing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, this one is much better than the others.

  24. Justifying evil by relative comparison? by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    Many workers are happy about their job and working conditions, in Foxconn and other such factories. These factories provide a lot of things (not just money) that they would never be able to dream of: a shelter over their head, varied meals, water, electricity, and more. Many of these people are uneducated and would be jobless otherwise.

    That doesn't preclude making conditions good from the start, and not simply good compared to the surrounding countryside.

    They need and are happy about these jobs. Your protesting will NOT IMPROVE THEIR LIVES. You will render them jobless (as you boycott these products and companies pull out of these countries) and effectively kill off their means of living.

    The same argument that was used to justify slavery. It got abolished, and peoples lives improved

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  25. Nobody Cares by Mr.+Lwanga · · Score: 1

    Apple isn't going to lean to hard on its suppliers, its all about the bottom line. After this drops off the news cycle, people will go back to 'Thinking Different' and not caring where their bright and shiny gadgets come from. Shareholders only care about profitability, not human welfare. As long as Apple keeps on producing the next iWant, workers in the cheap labor producing countries are out of luck.

  26. The Fair Labor Assn is anything but by RandCraw · · Score: 5, Informative

    CNN has a nice article that puts "The Fair Labor Association" in proper perspective:

    "Apple's major move has been to announce that it has joined an organization called the Fair Labor Association, which will "audit" Apple's factories. According to Apple, the Fair Labor Association is an independent watchdog that will work tenaciously to hold Apple and its suppliers accountable.

    Unfortunately, while there are some fine people at the association, the organization is not the independent watchdog Apple claims it to be. Indeed, most of its money -- millions of dollars per year -- comes from the very companies whose labor practices it is supposed to scrutinize. Although Apple has not disclosed its financial relationship with the Fair Labor Association, it is likely now the organization's largest funder. Moreover, on the association's board of directors sit executives of major corporations such as Nike, Adidas and agribusiness giant Syngenta. The job of these executives is to represent the interests of other member companies, such as Apple. Under the Fair Labor Association's rules, the company representatives on the board exercise veto power over major decisions."

    http://edition.cnn.com/2012/02/17/opinion/nova-apple-foxconn/index.html/

    1. Re:The Fair Labor Assn is anything but by jdogalt · · Score: 2

      this link might work better-

      http://edition.cnn.com/2012/02/17/opinion/nova-apple-foxconn/

      Also, my $0.02 on the China government apologists- it's all about the free speech/press. Without that, any corporate working condition reporting lacks credibility. I.e. the above comment 'now how about random inspections over a period of 6 months'. Though I went to the trouble of posting the fixed link because that piece covers that issue pretty well (see aluminum dust explosion issue).

      I'm certainly guilty of being a Foxconn/Apple hater, and agree that propogandists like myself are only singling that pair out due to the predicted higher effectiveness of that tactic, versus going after clothing companies, that people gave up caring much about long long ago. But with apple's high profile ipad success, and Jon Stewart's highlighting the Foxconn suicide net issue repeatedly, and it is clear that as unfairly unrepresentative as this example is, it is the one that is resonating with the public the best. To be honest, it's probably all about the Foxconn suicide nets. Nothing makes one look as evil as a slaver, as putting suicide nets outside your factory. Argue your bizarre, and perhaps even correct ethics you want, but that's not going to let up, until I suspect they take down the suicide nets, perhaps after more fully securing all the windows and roof access.

    2. Re:The Fair Labor Assn is anything but by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      most of its money -- millions of dollars per year -- comes from the very companies whose labor practices it is supposed to scrutinize

      Where *else* would they get their money?

      The UN is funded by *GASP* its member nations!

      Your local police department is funded by *GASP* you!

      So what?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  27. Suppliers by phorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Those aren't great examples.

    The companies you've listed aren't really "product line" companies. Yes, they have some of their own (rebranded) lines, but their primary business is selling other people's products (Nike, Reebok, Guess, Apple, Nintendo, whatever).

    That being said, I once knew somebody who worked as the middleman between a U.S. brand corp and Chinese manufacturers. Their contacts in the U.S. were ruthless and in many cases absolute dickheads. For whatever reason they could find, they'd slam the Chinese manufacturers with extra fees, penalties, etc. It became obvious fairly quickly that they considered the Chinese manufacturers a sort of sub-class... and the workers at said manufacturer weren't even considered at all.

    It's not just Apple, or even Foxconn, it's big business in the west overall. Given the way the corporatocracy treats locals as an inferior subspecies, it's not exactly unexpected. So long as the majority of consumers buy their products with no consideration to how they end up here, that's the way it will be.

    Don't weep for Apple. It's about time *somebody* noticed this sort of shit going all and asked their favoured corp an important question: "why?"
    One can only hope that it will result in some improvement, and - as Apple is currently a market leader - that it will eventually push other companies to follow.

    1. Re:Suppliers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slamming factories and other organizations with extra fees for doing wrong is normal, and if you don't do it, they will make the infraction again. Why should they consider the workers? that is the job of that manufacturing plant and company.

      Should we go around and see what the working conditions are in africa? russia?... you want us to go around and police the world?

      Go hug a tree you pathetic little nothing, please please castrate yourself and anyone related to you. It's because of genetic garbage like you that this world is in the position it is in now.

    2. Re:Suppliers by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      I suggest going back and reading books like "The Jungle".
      Same thing over there, and nothing happens until someone takes a stand.

      --
      -
    3. Re:Suppliers by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of weeping or not for Apple. It's a matter of focusing so much on one company (that seems to be doing alright in this regard), that the real problems get ignored. Do you somehow think that every other company being ignored by the media is going to change, just because Apple did? No, they're going to say, "wow, so great that Apple got all the attention so no one worries about what we are doing." That's not very good.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  28. Apple's fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This audit was done by a company Apple hired to whitewash their PR problems. This is not an independent audit.

  29. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by uglyduckling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thanks for translating. I'm presuming that you're aware of the manufacturing pedigree of the computer on which you're typing your comment, and that every component has come from a factory where workers have Western-style rights, working conditions, pay, sick leave, vacation etc..

    I'm pleased to hear that Apple products come from factories where conditions are far better than the norm in the prevailing culture. I hope that standards can be raised in all factories. I'm pretty sure that none of the workers are slaves.

  30. Superior working conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of the industry standard 4 hours of sleep Foxconn employees get 5 or 6 hours of sleep on Chinese New Years and Mao's birthday. They also receive two bowls of rice instead of one. If they are awoken early they get an extra cup of tea and biscuit before working an extra 12 hour shift.

    The point is being better than the rest doesn't mean good. It's like the line out of the Two Jakes where he says "in this town I'm the leper with the most fingers".

  31. The acceptable norm is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever they'll allow themselves to be whipped for. If it's abuse they should revolt. If it's agreed-upon business they should continue and rejoice that the machine is leading them toward their ends.

    1. Re:The acceptable norm is by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      If they try and organise, they are banged up for 12 years. I'm thinking that in the Chinese prison system, that's code for "slowly tortured to death over about 11.5 years" (just by the conditions. no need to hire a torturer, a skilled torturer is expensive, right?)

  32. Obviously, that's what free market does by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Government regulations and laws do the opposite of what free market does. Free market improves everybody's conditions, government deteriorates everybody's conditions.

    Free market makes everybody wealthier by providing products, services that people WANT to pay for enough that it creates profit. Free market provides investment opportunities, wages and even taxes.

    Government does not provide products and services that people WANT to pay for, it take upon itself to IMPOSE various ideas on what products and services should be forced onto people with the threat of violence. Government is theoretically 'non-profit', but there are plenty of individuals and corporations that make huge profits by using government violence. Government TAKES taxes, government DESTROYS investment opportunities.

    Free market pulls the average living standard up but in doing so it allows some people to get WAY above average - thus income inequality will always be there with free market but so will increase of wealth.

    Government pulls the average living standard down, it pretends that in doing so it will create 'income equality', while in reality the only equality that is created is equality of poverty and the real change is that the people who still get huge disproportionate income are not those who produce products and services that market wants to buy, but instead those, who are the most connected to the government and can STEAL THE MOST with government threat of violence.

    1. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Another Ayn Rand victim.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Troll

      First: what an "argument"!

      Second: I just read Rand's work, started a couple of weeks ago and posted the reviews (thus those links).

      I've been posting here, on /., for about 11 maybe 12 years. I don't think I need to dig out 12 years worth of various comments, all one needs to do is look at my journal to understand that I never needed Rand's books to think what I think.

      I am not a 'victim of Ayn Rand', I am a product of the world. The world, that is ran by stupid people.

      You see, it is stupidity that runs the world. When Ponzi ran his scam, it was stupidity, gullibility, the wrong type of greed as well, that let people buy into his scam and then those very stupid people that lost their money (but it's a tiny fraction of all people) pushed for more 'regulations' and 'laws', and thus more distortion of the economy by threat of violence from government, which always helps government to grow some more and steal some more.

      Stupidity rules the world and as long as it happens, there will be real con artists, and they will not be in free market, where con artists are eventually found out, their scams eventually fall apart and people stop wasting their money.

      Government ponzi scams are found out, but it doesn't mean that the scam stops, because there is threat of government violence that keeps the scam going. The government mandates that the scam must go on, and that's how it works, be it in SS or money itself.

    3. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by starworks5 · · Score: 1

      your so completely full of shit, you should go to school and learn something about economics, instead of spouting off that laissez faire nonsense. It's kind of your fault that you listen to such rhetoric, which often appeals to idealistic notions, but lacks the rigor of a proper education.

      more specifically look up "externalities", or "hoover dam".

      "he who has the gold makes the rules", power creates money money creates power. money can even create governments, like the late 19th century mining towns or saudi royal family.

      capitalism runs off of a positive feedback loops, until the feedback loop destroys itself, which is why regulation is required.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ7LzE3u7Bw

      if you have a EDU account, look up some agent based computational economics, (agents with resource mobility and foresight win) (distributed networks less efficient at the calculation problem than centralized systems)

      anyways, im up late because im in pain, from having had an ulcer today, otherwise i would go into more depth. But please stop pretending your an expert on this , until you've decided to spend a few years learning and practicing it.

    4. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by roman_mir · · Score: 2

      your so completely full of shit, you should go to school and learn something about economics, instead of spouting off that laissez faire nonsense. It's kind of your fault that you listen to such rhetoric, which often appeals to idealistic notions, but lacks the rigor of a proper education.

      - excellent "argument". ...

      anyways, im up late because im in pain, from having had an ulcer today, otherwise i would go into more depth. But please stop pretending your an expert on this , until you've decided to spend a few years learning and practicing it.

      - more excellent argument.

      What can I say, you are full of excellent argument.

      --

      By the way, I took this course on being more 'social' with people, they taught me this one thing: when I want to say that somebody is an "uneducated piece of retarded shill, who knows not of what he speaks", I instead must say: "excellent argument".

    5. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by tukang · · Score: 2

      Property laws are the most basic form of government regulation. If someone beats you over the head with a bat and takes your wallet, who's to say that he didn't just "earn" your wallet? Should the government use force to protect people's property or should it simply let the fittest people survive on their own? By providing law and order, the government allows for an environment where productivity (as opposed to brute force) is rewarded most ... and if you agree with property laws then you're not advocating for a truly free market, so where do you draw the line? If you say you're only in favor of laws that increase productivity then you're of the same opinion as those who support gov't regulation in general - you just have a different opinion of which laws work and which ones don't but you both agree that the law should be used to boost productivity.

    6. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by Aviation+Pete · · Score: 1

      Government regulations and laws do the opposite of what free market does. Free market improves everybody's conditions, government deteriorates everybody's conditions.

      Please don't forget that you need a strong and active government to keep the market free. Otherways, you might end up with the sort of oligopoly and near monopoly that is prevalent in many US sectors now. Please note also that I am not talking about the kind of strong government which is burdening Russia today. A better example would be Norway. Or New Zealand. There are enough in this world to prove my point, just look around!

      In the end it takes both: Free markets and benign government intervention.

      --
      You know it's time for the next revolution when your rulers' names end with roman numerals.
    7. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I suppose you didn't participate in that 'end copyrights and patents' discussion, where I specifically said that I don't believe in gov't policing of private property either. It's none of government's business to police private property.

      The entire premise that gov't must be there to protect one individual from actions of another individual is wrong.

      Government is there to occupy the space that is always reserved for somebody who will govern, and as such, it is inherently evil, and as such, it must exist only with the law above it (Constitution) ensuring that the only thing that government exists for and does is to protect individuals from government itself. That's why government that breaks the chains of the law, the chains imposed by it by the real contract between government and people - Constitution, is so important.

      Now, local matters are local, at least there is competition among localities. But just saying that Constitution does not grant authority to the federal government to take away powers from State governments, does NOT imply that State governments automatically get those powers. It just means it is up to the people in the State to decide how those power are allocated, and the best way is to deny the State government most powers as well.

      Having government ensuring border security and judging in cases of contract law is one thing.

      Having government running police force to threaten individuals with violence in order to beat them into submission, while pretending that this is for their own good, is another thing altogether. Individuals are capable of handling their affairs with other individuals without government interference.

    8. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Please don't forget that you need a strong and active government to keep the market free.

      - don't take it the wrong way, but this is what's called an 'oxymoron'. You can't have free market being forced by threat of violence. It's sort of like "noisy silence", "sweet sorrow", "artificial grass" and all these other contradictions.

      It is again, propaganda that is pushed onto the people by government that makes you believe in such .... silly thing.

      There is no such thing as a 'natural monopoly', and definitely government laws cannot make market FREE.

      The purpose of government is to exist and to be chained by the Constitution, all so that others are denied the power that being government allows. That's what is broken - people broke the system and now the government is not what people need it to be (something that exists to deny some usage of it in order to prevent abuse of power, that government holds).

      The only help that people get from government is the fact that it exists as a system that is understood to be completely inherently evil, and as such is actively prevented from meddling with people's affairs, and prevents individuals from becoming government.

      Individuals becoming government - that's where the danger is. Bush and Obama becoming kings that kill people on a whim - that's the danger.

      Market without force of government intervention is free in itself. Some companies will do better and some will do worse, but there is never one company that will hold on to its dominance forever, and even holding to dominance for a very long time is problematic, as companies age, they become difficult to maneuver and they don't react to the market changes quickly enough.

      But government helps to destroy companies, that is true, destroy them with various 'anti-competitive' laws at the time when those companies are very much profitable because they provide a product that may dominate the market for THAT TIME PERIOD. So what? The people pay to that company voluntarily. Gov't can break it, but it's never done to help the market of people, it's done to help special interests who want a piece of that pie.

      It's always about special interests aiming at grabbing some part of that money, success, it's never about individual customers, because individual customers are already voting with their wallets.

      There is no problem with companies that are huge - economies of scale. They provide the lowest prices for the products and eventually that's what brings in the customers, that's all.

      That's GOOD. That enforces the free market to innovate and to invent ways to drop the prices (or maybe to increase quality or maybe both).

      It is competition, and gov't regulations are by design against competition, they create monopolies, they destroy competitive markets and they pretend this is done to help consumers and that's the propaganda that's being pushed upon everybody.

      Same as all the war propaganda, same as all the money propaganda.

    9. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by tukang · · Score: 1

      To me, government is any person or organization that attempts to oppress me through the use of force. For example, I would classify slavery as a form of (very small and local) government from the point of view of the slave even if there is no state involvement. In that sense, I agree that the only ethical government is the one that protects individuals from oppressive governments.

      By definition, government must be a product of the free market (because when the government didn't exist, the market was free). The free market strives to increase productivity, and security is a necessary component of productivity. If someone robbed you, you could privately resolve the matter and you might ask some of your stronger friends for assistance. Over time these friends might form a security business and they might realize they can increase their profits by just taking stuff ... or if they're nice, they could form a police force and have property laws. In any case, this is how the government evolves. You say that the government is inherently evil but from the individual's point of view, so are other people. And the gov't is there to prevent them from trying to govern you.

    10. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by starworks5 · · Score: 2

      my father and my uncle all think as you do, and what is common between you, is that you are anti-social. So it comes as to no surprise that you dislike social systems, and want to be a rugged and free individual, and believe that every man is an island. The issue is that economics along with politics, are treated like a sort of religion, one that should conform to a persons pre-conceived perceptions (and thus avoid cognitive dissonance).

      I don't presume why you would presume to know better about politics or economics, when its clear that some of the most dedicated and brilliant minds contradict you, even a simple google search would reveal empirical evidence to contradict your statements. Do you also disagree with climate scientists over global warming, or with biologists over how/if abiogenesis occurred, what qualifications do you offer above the consensus of economists?

      I posted some very specific criticisms that directly contradict your statements, many of which are easily disproven by anyone willing to question their own rhetoric. you addressed none of them whatsoever, and instead took offense when i criticized you qualifications, which are apparent from your lack of knowledge in that domain. But seeing as how your such an asshole, i hope that you eventually learn what its like, to have a bleeding stomach full of digestive fluids

    11. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Free market makes everybody wealthier by providing products, services that people WANT to pay for enough that it creates profit. Free market provides investment opportunities, wages and even taxes."

      You mean the free market like Wal-Mart?

    12. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One persons freedom is anothers slavery - I'm free to keep slaves. Without laws, and without government to enforce those laws anything goes, child labour, slavery, forced sex, addictive substances, "anything", as there is a market for them.

      Indeed, the result of and unrestricted "free market", is to reduce an individuals freedom as it is in the interests of those companies to become not just monopolies in thier "market", but also in those markets that they need, indeed it is arguable that the final result of a free market would be indistinguisable to Monarchy.

    13. Re:Obviously, that's what free market does by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I am certain I have nothing to do with your ulcer, you need to take it easy, maybe it's your attitude that doesn't really help your condition? Get well.

  33. Re:White Opinions on Taiwanese Factory in Guangdon by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    They are owned by Taiwan, employ management from Hong Kong, employ Cantonese labor , and are governed by Mandarin communist party staff.

    Makes it easy for the mainlanders to be divided against each other, much like how their military brought in troops from the countryside for the 1989 massacre.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  34. Yes I am, and it's less PRC than you think. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Some of my computers are old enough to where they do have the Made in the US label(circa 2000, at that). Same with the great deal of my components such as the keyboard.

    It's not as if there isn't the capacity to manufacture in the US. As an example, look up the TAA (Trade Act) compliant models of IBM-era Thinkpads, where they were made to the same degree in the US that the Foxconn-built bits were made in the PRC. They stretch from when there was actual US manufacturing up to about 5-6 years ago(e.g. T42's, T60(?)'s).

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Yes I am, and it's less PRC than you think. by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      What's rather interesting is some electronics are actually made in the US but will appear to be made in China. A few years ago I got a factory tour of a small US company that makes all of their electronics except for the PCBs they go on. The PCB has in giant white letters MADE IN CHINA, but the Made in China part was simply the green board. The soldering of capacitors and connectors, guiding the things through machines that do the more finer details, testing, putting cases on, etc was all done in New Jersey.

  35. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  36. Re:Mike Daisey in China, talking about working lif by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Listen to the show, its a simple reason why you use human hands :) - cost.
    As the work becomes more complex and the cost per unit goes up, robots will be needed, until then that tech device will be done by humans in many very small, fine steps.
    China gets export cash and pays its locals in its own currency - just enough for food, some basic shelter and a few extras.
    So at this time the cost of local humans vs importing robots may not add up. If China can make its own robots and use them with less cash flowing out to import older production lines, expensive skills and long term more imported parts - that will be interesting.
    Why waste cash until the products get extra complex or human hands get too expensive in China.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  37. Bullshit..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    post and story......
    http://thenextweb.com/apple/2012/02/17/the-fla-now-says-apples-foxconn-factories-have-tons-of-issues/

    Read some more articles and realise what you are dealing with and you should know that this whole slashdot headline +article is nothing then BS!
    How much is ./ getting payed to write nice things about bad companies? :)

  38. What about wages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty sure when the work condition thing is over, someone will make a big deal out of the lower wages of Foxconn workers.

  39. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by janimal · · Score: 1

    So.. they first say that they're finding lots of issues, and then go on to conclude that conditions are great? In addition, they say the first thing BEFORE a presentation of preliminary findings to Foxconn management and the conclusion comes AFTER?

    With the amount of money at stake for the FC management, draw your own conclusions.

  40. Re:White Opinions on Taiwanese Factory in Guangdon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the activists weren't concerned with anything else than corporate sponsors to run their organization. they didn't just show up at the factory either. it's like going to NK as a controlled guest, taking hoe's an' blo and announcing everything is great.

    that
    is
    the
    real
    story.

    another real story would of course be checking out the sourcing factories for the assembly factories which scrape most of the profit anyways and sub-contract the really nasty work involving deadly chemicals.

  41. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually their funding is evidence, check it out.

    This is NOT a case of the old watchdog groups changing their opinion on Apple practices, but a case of Apple sponsoring a silly named org from their billions and drumming that org's report up.

    how do you think they got the connections to do a checkup at the factories in the first place? because they're the contracted so-called-watchdog group.

    Why do you think it promos the factory as a factory making Apple products, iPads and iPhones and not just as factory complex XXX making products for companies X, Y, Z, W and P? because it's Apples Fairness campaign organization.

    and as to why they took FLA to use for this purpose? well fuck, if you have to compete against puma and adidas in fairness .. ... ... you're taking the really fucking easy way out. Literally, all the companies Apples factories were benchmarked against in this case are the sort of companies that make five buck college shirts with child labor occasionally. Check their site and wonder what the fuck is apple doing in a textile industry organization.

  42. Clean factory with soul crushing overtime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I personally have spent a few months in Chinese steel mills on and off as part of my old job as an automation/GUI programmer.. The plants are dirty as you could possibly imagine, dangerous and badly maintained, but the workers I saw actually seemed quite relaxed and worked fairly normal 8 hour shifts, took lunch breaks etc. I notice the quote only focused on the physical conditions at Foxconn, but it seems like this is probably more of a management problem. The plants might be nice and clean but if the workers need to work 12 hours a day 7 days a week for fear of losing their job of course some of them are going to get pretty depressed. What is the point of earning money in "clean" working conditions if you have no life, why not just jump out the window right now?

  43. "...what is the acceptable norm?" by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Union scale in the USA, of course. Do you think this is about human rights or something?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  44. Re:This article is for Apple-haters by jo_ham · · Score: 2

    Yes, and it was expected - this isn't the first time people have visited the plant and checked, or the first time Apple has had a code of practice.

    The outcome of the report was irrelevant though, since slashdot Apple bashers had made up their minds when Apple announced the FLA would be doing audits for them - if they find positive stuff, then its clearly just Foxxcon "hiding the abuse" while the FLA are visiting, or they release a pre-written report given to them by Apple and cash a fat cheque, and if they released a negative report then it's "validation all along about how evil Apple is".

    The actual facts of the matter rarely play a part in Apple bashing. No Apple hater is going to believe this study was valid because it didn't fit their preconceptions of the "facts" that they know to be true, deep in their gut.

  45. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    If any of them talk to each other about the possibility of starting a union, they serve 12 years in jail. I heard this from the source that started this whole Apple Foxconn thing... the John Stewart show.

    I read different things. For example here: http://www.socialistproject.ca/relay/relay21_unions.pdf

    Quote: "Laws protecting union rights in China are better than in many other countries. With 25 worker signatures in a workplace, the employer must recognize the union. Once recognized, the employer must pay 2% of payroll to the union and the workers must pay 0.5%. The new Labour Contract Law, which will come into effect January 1, 2008, will help to ensure unions have the right to negotiate collective agreements."

  46. What even the shills can't deny: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in the west our factories have ZERO rate of suicide, or even the society at large.
    Think about it, when was the last time you heard of a suicide story here in the west? Ever. Hmmmm....?

    So screw you FLA, you commie shill.

  47. Not so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because you wouldn't be willing to do the job doesn't mean that they aren't proud of the work that they do.

    Yes there are going to be instances of neglect and abuse, but this company employs nearly a MILLION people. Statistically speaking they should be having all kinds of things happen that don't usually happen at your company. It might happen once to your company over a decade, but with their size all those anomalies look like patterns.

    People are making livable wages and have relatively safe work environments. Look at our on history for poor labor condition and realize that China is going through the exact same growth pains. You cannot simply demand that they jump through all the learning that we've done through the decades. People assume that just paying people more is going to solve problems, but honestly more money in the economy isn't going to necessarily make lives better it will likely just make prices go up. Then in reality if the other factories don't follow suit you're actually hurting the other people in the economy.

  48. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by Smurf · · Score: 1

    So.. they first say that they're finding lots of issues, and then go on to conclude that conditions are great? In addition, they say the first thing BEFORE a presentation of preliminary findings to Foxconn management and the conclusion comes AFTER?

    You got it backwards.

    On February 15 they said that Foxconn's is a "first class" factory that is much better than many others in China, in particular garment factories.

    Then on February 17 (yesterday) they said that nevertheless they are finding "tons of issues" that need to be addressed.

  49. Foxconn Auditor Finds ‘Tons of Issues’ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-17/foxconn-auditor-finds-tons-of-issues-.html

  50. Disconnect by hackus · · Score: 1

    Nothing to see here...

    These are not the slave workers you are looking for.

    Apple executives can go about their business.

    Move along to the next post ..

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  51. MY master provides better conditions by msobkow · · Score: 1

    MY slave master provides better working conditions than YOUR slave master.

    But the Chinese workers at these offshore provider manufacturing companies are ALL treated as badly as slaves in the old US south. REGARDLESS of whether they're officially "indentured servants" or not.

    The fact that some companies treat their employees worse than Foxconn/Apple does NOT mean that ANY of them treat their employees with anything even RESEMBLING dignity or respect.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  52. Re:This article is for Apple-haters by cookiej · · Score: 1
    Here, here.

    All things being equal, it seems that Apple is doing more than everyone else. But Apple is being bashed for not "Doing The Right Thing." So where's the bashing for Google? HTC? Samsung? Dell? I agree that the industry needs to continue to improve conditions. I find it heartening that even the Apple Haters admit that Apple is doing more than the rest.

    I'm not a believer in dramatic, overnight change. That level of change tends to create more problems than it solves. To expect Apple to come in, wave their cash and change the culture is naive, immature and smacks of the arrogance we as westerners are always accused of.

    While I do think the quickness of the report makes it less credible, it's interesting to note that the folks who accuse the company of "whitewashing" things also mention that the employees would put on a good show for the evaluators to make sure Apple sticks with Foxconn.

    Of course they would. Because, despite whatever "abuses" are going on, the workers seem to want their jobs. It would be interesting to ask them if they would like to go back to the way things were before the factories came in.

    It seems that the Apple-hating folks always assume the worst, despite at least *some* proof to the contrary. Could there be rampant explotation and de-humanization of the employees? Sure. Could this be the nirvana of all workplaces, with everyone smiling, well-rested and well-to-do while doing lots of work? Sure.

    My guess is that the truth is somewhere inbetween. Since Apple appears to be making an effort to be honest (let's not forget that initiated this freely) and working to improve things, I'll cut them some slack. I'm sure if this whole thing is a cover-up and Foxconn is really a current day Rura Penthe, I'll be the first to turn in my iDevices.

    (or if they start charging for software per-device!)

  53. First Class - by Chinese standards, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which are barely any better than pre-WW2 labor conditions in Europe and the US.

  54. Re:bonch is an apple shill Re:Foxconn and Apple by cookiej · · Score: 2

    On a related note, where DID you get that spiffy tinfoil hat?

  55. Two big questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1) Are the inspectors telling the truth about what they saw?
    2) Was what they saw the truth?

    When Red X representatives visited Theresienstadt/Terezin Fortress ([one of] the "Arbeit Macht Frei" camps), they fell for the fiction the Nazis choreographed of it being a nice, pleasant place for the Jews to live.

  56. We already freaking knew that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No sh*t Sherlock. You only had to read Slashdot like 4 years ago to get a full rundown on Foxconn and working conditions in China. We're targeting Foxconn when that's one of the best factories in China for working conditions. The problem isn't Foxconn, it's Chinese factory labor. China has labor laws that are completely unenforced because of how lucrative American corporate sponsored cheap labor is for the country.

  57. Irrelevant by happyhamster · · Score: 1

    I hope that conditions are bearable and will improve, but it's irrelevant. Those manufacturing jobs must come home to support healthy U.S. economy.

    Before squealing starts how some basement dweller is "not willing to pay 10 times more" for their toys, for one, it would not be nearly as much. Research discussed on Slashdot recently produced numbers of around 23%. I'd be willing to pay 23% more for healthy U.S. economy or go without. If you don't, that's tough for you. There needs to be a nationwide referendum in the U.S. if you want to protect U.S. economy by punitive tariffs on scumbag outsources, or give your money to chinese communists who have wet dreams of eventually destroying the U.S. (yes they do). I have no doubt what the result would be.

  58. Not surprising..... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    ...to anyone who has listened to a talk given by the neocon gaytard head of that association, who stridently believes the "free market" will solve everything. Sure, I believe everything out of that outfit.....

  59. Re:This article is for Apple-haters by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    this isn't the first time people have visited the plant and checked, or the first time Apple has had a code of practice.

    And http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?pagewanted=all>not the first time Apple has pretended to do something and not actually done anything about the deaths.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  60. Re:This article is for Apple-haters by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    (corrected link)

    this isn't the first time people have visited the plant and checked, or the first time Apple has had a code of practice.

    And not the first time Apple has pretended to do something and not actually done anything about the deaths.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  61. Re:This article is for Apple-haters by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    All things being equal, it seems that Apple is doing more than everyone else.

    All things being equal and business as usual, I have come to expect reality distortion from Apple.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  62. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    Naturally I say something bad about Apple, and someone modbombs it...

    I used to think it was just misguided Apple fans, now I understand that they are paid spindroids. I do not think the actual effect is as they wish. Instead this behavior just makes me more inclined to express critical opinions of Apple, its business practices, and its ethics.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  63. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by icebike · · Score: 1

    Once recognized, the employer must pay 2% of payroll to the union and the workers must pay 0.5%.

    Net result is the workers lose 2.5%, all based on the preferences of 25 workers.

    This from a Socialist site, praising China!!! let me show you my shocked face.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  64. So you justify slavery? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    How dare anyone sit in judgment of China for trying to better the lives of its people through wealth creation. If you want to judge the government for its assaults on freedom thats great.. but to judge the country because the people want a better life and are doing the same shit we did to make better lives for ourselves.. its bullshit... tired old dogmatic bullshit.

    You can start with conditions that are good by the First World, instead of dragging down the world to the Third World's level. The conditions are thus improved and slavery is bypassed.

    These factories need to be in much better conditions, and not a moment too soon for apologists like you.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  65. They work for Wal-Mart's PR team. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In addition, these people that shill for WM will do anything to marginalize opposition, even if it means they corrupt the city council.

  66. You forget how powerful the US is. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Should they try to flee, the government will be more than happy to make it a futile move. Especially given that the US can be anywhere it wants, doing what it wants.

    The companies would then be forcibly repatriated, and run by people that won't repeat the same mistake - or sabotage the company.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  67. Like chavs? Thank Ms. Thatcher for them. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    *really?* I remember what industry used to look like - in the first world - back in the heyday of the trade union. Health and safety didn't exist. Good luck if you were black, or Jewish, or gay, or female. If you fell out with the union rep, you were on your own. And in the meantime, you were being tapped for union dues that went to fund a party espousing some of the most fucked-up economic policies the UK ever saw.

    While as a consequence from the glorious butchering of the UK's internal job market, you created a worse-off situation with people that have no jobs whatsoever and an increasing propensity to commit crime. Perhaps your Tory deity should have thought about that long-term consequence instead of going like a butcher to unionized countryfolk.

    What creates better conditions for workers is economic progress, so that workers don't have to go and work in a paper mill where they lose fingers as a matter of routine, or a shipyard where workers fell from gantries every week.

    The problem is that you advocate conditions where businesses would allow those kind of conditions to come back. In addition, you cause a regression to a time where business would be able to be authoritarian with no check against it such as done with labor unions.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  68. Re:Fair Labor Assoc. == Apple Shill group by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that none of the workers are slaves.

    I'm not.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  69. Re:Like chavs? Thank Ms. Thatcher for them. by u38cg · · Score: 1

    Chavs existed long before Maggie; they just had no visibility. Crime in the UK has declined since the implementation of the 1980s reforms. And I don't think anyone is talking about repealing the HSE; but the fact is that when a country becomes rich enough, people refuse to work in poor conditions. It happened in the UK, in the US, and it will happen in China.

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  70. Think Different... by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    Buy fake "independent" organizations to pitch your lies and propaganda, so that your minions of obedient little clo.. err, customers will still feel good about buying your overpriced crap.

    Oh, wait... THAT isn't "different" at all, it's American business as usual.