Slashdot Mirror


Why Canada Does Not Belong On the US Piracy Watchlist

An anonymous reader writes "Each year, the U.S. government places Canada on its piracy watch list, claiming that it is a pirate country similar to China or Russia. This year, Professor Michael Geist and Public Knowledge teamed up to respond to myths about Canadian copyright law with a submission to the USTR focusing on how Canadian law provides adequate and effective protection, how enforcement is stronger than often claimed, why Canada is not a piracy haven, and why Bill C-11 does not harm the interests of rights holders (critics of Bill C-11 digital lock rules will likely think this is self-evident)."

17 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. Ok, so... by owenferguson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I send a legit copy of something I have the copyright on to a friend, using the internet, and the ISP records a copy of my traffic at the government's behest, aren't they engaging in piracy?

  2. Simple - Politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (Posting AC because I'm at work)

    The reason Canada is on the piracy watch list is simple - Canadian politicians want us to be there so they can have a reason to craft draconian laws that appease big media's wishes. Really, it's that simple - it's political manoeuvring in an effort to get the public to support legislation that is "clearly needed" because, you know, we're on the US's piracy watch list so things must be bad in Canada! We need to fix it. Now just accept these laws that allow warrantless searches and other things that are obscene so I can get my phat payoff cash from Big Media Corp.

    Really, it's that simple. And pathetic.

    1. Re:Simple - Politics by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Informative

      This should not be a surprise to anyone in the know. After all, it's coming from the man who wanted to rename the Government of Canada after himself in all official communications.

      "L'état, c'est moi" indeed. Just in a bit of a Quebecois accent.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Simple - Politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You really understand nothing of the issues involved, do you? Artists have really little to say in this debate; in fact alot of those against the current copyright putch are muzzeled by their recording contracts. No. All this is a move by the content holders (not artists, whom, for a majority, do not own copyrights to their own works) that see their livelyhood threathened by self publication and the demise of their retail cash cow. It is a war of control and monstruous profits. And our increasingly totalitarist goverments, well compasated by their industry friends, are just happy to get along. See all the laws they are trying to pass that will erode what little privacy and liberty you currently enjoy. It is scary. Artists will end up being screwed after this, indies or signed. Nobody but them will win.

      But have fun drinking their Kool Aid, by all means...

    3. Re:Simple - Politics by poetmatt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      copying without permission?

      If you have to ask permission to copy something, there's a problem with the laws that exist.

      Creating an uncertainty of "can I copy something?" is what burdens entire societies and creates unnecessary costs. see: united states.

    4. Re:Simple - Politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The ARTISTS have been the only ones saying that piracy DOESNT hurt them. It's the crooked publishers and distributors that are actually hurting the artists.

      Did you forget about the scandal where Canadian labels were ACTUALLY PIRATING MATERIAL FROM ARTISTS they didnt have contracts with?

      http://www.zeropaid.com/news/93594/canadian-record-labels-settle-royalty-suit-for-50-million/

      It happened for YEARS and the case took forever just for the artists to get a FRACTION of what was owed. They were on the hook for ***$6 BILLION*** and they bled the case out long enough to settle for a measly $50 million paid out over a few YEARS. WHAT THE FUCK.

      If you take a look around, you'll realize that the tired "sharing music hurts artists" line flat out wrong. The labels are the ones fucking them right out of money....then paying back a FRACTION.

    5. Re:Simple - Politics by Creepy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That doesn't help - because Canadian copyright law does not match US copyright law, Canadians are violating US copyright law with what they call "public domain," and not changing their laws to match ours makes them evil slimy bastards that owe our publishers lots of money. The only recourse is to have all the countries in the world change their copyright law to match US copyright law, and yeah, that just isn't going to happen, nor should it, because that is stepping on each countries sovereign rights. Incidentally, most countries have pretty much the same copyright law as Canada (life + 50 years is the most common, life + 70 years second most common - here is a picture)

    6. Re:Simple - Politics by toriver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, we need an "artist exploitation watchlist", so that Elvis Costello and Motörhead don't have to go out and publically WARN their fans against buying over-priced box sets made to line the pockets of record company executives.

  3. Bill C-11 by bigbangnet · · Score: 4, Informative
    Theres a bill in Canada about copyright. It's the C-11 bill

    http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Docid=5144516&file=4

    it was Bill C-61 first, then it died and was replaced by Bill C-32 which also died. Now its called Bill C-11. Have fun reading this.

    Theres also a website which gives lots of information on that bill : http://www.digital-copyright.ca/billc11/

  4. but we DO according to Zoe Addington by denis-The-menace · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/1048993--leaks-show-u-s-swayed-canada-on-copyright-bill?bn=1

    A U.S. Embassy cable written in April 2009 describes a meeting between
    Zoe Addington, director of policy for then industry minister Clement, and U.S. officials.

    In contrast to the messages from other Canadian officials, she said that
    if Canada is elevated to the Special 301 Priority Watch List (PWL), it would not hamper
    and might even help the (government of Canada's) ability to enact copyright legislation,

    the cable says.

    Days later, Canada was elevated on the piracy watch list.

    NOTE: entire post shamelessly stolen from guidryp

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  5. lolwut? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pfffbbt! Canada! Of course you don't put imaginary lands on watch lists. Canada is an old fairy tell parents tell when they don't want their children to become improv comics or hockey fans.

  6. Re:Conservatives to bring law in line with the U.S by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone forgetting that it was the liberals who brought us up to bring the law into line in the first place? Besides, I'd have thought that you'd have figured something out. That even with enough outcry the government still listens to the people up here. Otherwise C30 wouldn't be open for discussion being modified, we wouldn't have scrapped the long gun registry. And we sure wouldn't be looking at scrapping S.13 from the HRC(the one that prohibits free speech).

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  7. Re:Canada should strive to be on every list like t by jeffc128ca · · Score: 3, Interesting

    " Canada, as a raw material and energy exporter, needs to allow its currency to be set by the market..."

    What the hell are you talking about?!? Canada's currency is a freely floating one and has been for a few decades. It's one of the few countries on the planet that has a completely floating exchange rate. As for natural resources we have a time honored tradition of selling it abroad. The oil sands in Alberta being the latest.

  8. I just want Dexter Season 4 and up... by jeffc128ca · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Piracy here is definitely a problem as I have many friends constantly encouraging me to get my media it the down and dirty way. I have stubbornly been trying to do it the legit way for a long time now. The latest is in trying to get Dexter season 4 and up. Season 1 to 3 is on Netflix Canada but I will be damned if I can rent seasons 4 and up any where. I solved this by using a VPN proxy to the U.S. and some gift card trickery on Amazon to watch it online. I lied to pay for it instead of pirating it.

    There is a crap load of content we can never get because some rights holder here in Canada won't allow it to be shown at all here. That's why we can't get Pandora or Spotify. I've seen Canadian indy musicians have their stuff available on iTunes U.S. long before it's available in the Canadian store.

    How long do I put up with this before I become a total pirate? Right now I pay a proxy service to pretend like I am American so I can buy the content. I want to pay and be legit but at some point it's just easier to pirate the stuff.
     

  9. Re:Not sure that was really discussing piracy... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Canada's laws allow Canadians to pirate whatever they like at will with no fear of repercussions.

    No. Canada has some explicit "fair use" exceptions in our copyright legislation. It's still illegal to distribute widely.

    You can't just give away copies of digital things willy nilly, but you can make a rip of a CD your friend loans you. Though, if the current government have their way, breaking any form of 'digital lock' would become a criminal offense, even if it's to exercise your existing rights.

    And, since the media companies insisted on it, we pay a levy on blank recordable media. So, to many of us, they've already secured payment from us. So I don't particularly care if I rip a CD -- though, I generally prefer to buy them so I have a physical copy that I rip. They've got their piracy slush fund, so fuck 'em.

    He points out that "illegal camcording had largely disappeared from the Canadian market", so I'm not sure why you're claiming it's widespread. He's also talking about how Canada has a thriving digital music market place, which means people are buying music here. Hell, I've bought several hundred CDs over the last bunch of years ... but, I know I'm likely the exception.

    And, I wouldn't be so quick to accuse Geist of confusing correlation and causation ... he's a law professor who studies this kind of stuff in depth. He's not some n00b who makes a habit of bad logic.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  10. Re:Conservatives to bring law in line with the U.S by ToadProphet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That even with enough outcry the government still listens to the people up here. Otherwise C30 wouldn't be open for discussion being modified, we wouldn't have scrapped the long gun registry. And we sure wouldn't be looking at scrapping S.13 from the HRC(the one that prohibits free speech).

    I believe you mean 'selectively listens to the people up here'. The LGR is a good example - I was vehemently opposed to that massive money pit but polls put support for it at 2/3rds and greater. Scrapping the S.13 was a private members bill put forth by a Liberal. And let's let the dust settle on C30 before declaring victory - the Cons aren't at all the libertarian leaning party many make them out to be.

    --
    It's on America's tortured brow, That Mickey Mouse has grown up a cow
  11. Re:Conservatives to bring law in line with the U.S by quacking+duck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's fine to blame the Liberals (or the most-recent government of a different party) for laws they passed and screwed up and the current government has to fix, but stop blaming the Liberals for legislation that never passed. If the Conservatives thought it was a bad bill, they wouldn't have resurrected it.

    And FYI, many Liberal supporters fought against those bills when the Liberals introduced them. Why can't Conservative supporters stop blindly supporting bills and laws just because they're backed by Conservatives? Are they that blind that they MUST unwaveringly follow their leader in all things?

    C-30 was backpedaled on not because of massive public outcry, because the Harper Conservatives are used to ignoring that. What they AREN'T used to is a significant number of their base vocally and publicly turning on them. Even Sun News, the far-right news outlet that almost always supports the Conservative agenda, called Toews "an idiot" and said the bill was indefensible ("in its current form").