Slashdot Mirror


Santorum Defends Robocalls To Democrats

Hugh Pickens writes "The LA Times reports that Rick Santorum defended his robocalls urging Democrats in Michigan to vote in today's critical primary, a tactic that has come under withering criticism from rival Mitt Romney as a 'terrible dirty trick' and a 'new low for his campaign.' Santorum says he reached out to Democratic voters, who can vote in the primary, to show that 'we can attract voters we need to win states like Michigan,' and noted that the former Massachusetts governor has wooed Democrats in the past and used Santorum's own words endorsing him in the 2008 race on a robocall of his own. 'I didn't complain about it. I don't complain. You know what, I'm a big guy. I can take it.' Romney crossed party lines himself to vote for Paul Tsongas in the 1992 Democratic primary over Bill Clinton in order to cause mischief for the general election. 'In Massachusetts, if you register as an independent, you can vote in either the Republican or Democratic primary,' said Romney, who until he made an unsuccessful run for Senate in 1994 had spent his adult life as a registered independent."

21 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. Stop it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has no place on /.

    1. Re:Stop it. by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This has no place on /.

      I second this motion. All in favor?

    2. Re:Stop it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slashdot has always covered major political events, certainly presidential elections. Certain things are "New for Everyone", of which "News for Nerds" is a subset.

    3. Re:Stop it. by GodInHell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Aye.

    4. Re:Stop it. by bobcat7677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Aye! This is neither news for nerds (I'm sure everyone, nerd or otherwise, has already seen the headlines), nor does it matter (a gaggle of politicians posturing over trivialities of the campaign process is about as un-meaningful as it gets). Wake me up when it's time to vote.

    5. Re:Stop it. by forkfail · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And absolutely who the next president is - and the fight to get there - is going to have fallout that impacts the technical/nerd/geek world.

      The politicians and other powers that be are quite aware of our toys and the potential of what we do, and absolutely want to own and control it.

      --
      Check your premises.
    6. Re:Stop it. by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This has no place on /.

      Then what is this /. section called politics for then?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    7. Re:Stop it. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a major entertainment event though. Like reality TV, only with more crazy.

    8. Re:Stop it. by Darth+Snowshoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agree. This is part of a long Michigan tradition of crossover voting. Big deal.

      If they ever conclusively prove that Romney is a cyborg, that would be /.-worthy.

    9. Re:Stop it. by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While it's true that the presidential election is important: a) it gets covered to death (and more) by the MSM, it's not one of those stories we might miss because it's on some news site we don't peruse often, and b) a story about robo-calling actually has little to do with the presidential election - it barely has anything to do with deciding who will even be a candidate.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    10. Re:Stop it. by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nope.

      Ron Paul is A-OK with burning people at the stake, if that's done according to state laws (not federal ones).

  2. Contradiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Romney crossed party lines himself to vote for Paul Tsongas in the 1992 Democratic primary ...Romney, who until he made an unsuccessful run for Senate in 1994 had spent his adult life as a registered independent.

    So he didn't "cross party lines" then, did he?

    1. Re:Contradiction by sorak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would hate to think if voting in an opposing party's primary were a federal offense. As a liberal in a deeply red state, I know that the only vote I have is my vote in the GOP primary. They will vote "Not Obama", and the electoral college system assures that "Not Obama" will get my share of my state's votes. I should have some say in who "Not Obama" is.

      The only difference between what I'm doing and what Santorum is encouraging is that I am voting for the guy who I would want to see in office, if Obama loses. To me, it's important, but I understand that most people wouldn't care about that distinction.

  3. How is this good for Santorum? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would Santorum want to engage Democrats in the Republican primary. He's the fringe right wing candidate. Romney is nigh indistinguishable from the Democratic incumbant. If a Democrat shows up at the Republican primary, the odds are very good that he'll vote Romney.

    The only way I can see a Democrat voting for Santorum in the primary is to help Obama win in the general election. Is Santorum banking on his own unelectability to win the primary? Or is that reading too much into this?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:How is this good for Santorum? by Skapare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Democrats would cross over to vote for Santorum just to sabotage any chance for Republicans to beat Obama. Santorum has no hope in the general election while Romney actually has a slim chance.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:How is this good for Santorum? by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Santorum is thinking of himself. Not the Republican party. Or the US in general. He's got this megalomaniacal mindset that says he's the only one that can run this country. But then that's true of most politicians.

      You would think that the sane candidate would be using his parties' primary to sound out his electability in the general election. But instead, all of them are playing to their parties' median, forgetting that they represent about half of the electorate. Not good team players IMO.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  4. Yes, please. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps all the Democrats should heed Santorum's call to vote in the Michigan Republican primary - and vote for Ron Paul.
    That will show 'em. :-)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Yes, please. by Beelzebud · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, if the Democrat ignores his voting record, his positions on social issues, or the racist newsletter he put his name on for a decade and made millions from.

  5. Re:Robo-calls make me avoid your product. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can, however, be in favour of strengthening vocational training without foaming at the mouth about liberal colleges destroying America(TM), as he did last week.

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  6. Re:Come over to the Netherlands, we'll euthanise h by wintercolby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All of the euthanasias in the US are against the will of the person dying, we just use the euphemism "death penalty". I'm constantly amazed at how the side that's "Pro-Life" is so intent on killing adults.

    --
    Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
  7. Re:Come over to the Netherlands, we'll euthanise h by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, a handful of drone strikes in Libya and Somalia don't count.

    I think if a drone struck your home, you might have a different opinion on whether that's an act of war. Although, Libya would be a rather minor transgression, if he hadn't violated the War Powers Act by staying there past the deadline.

    He did end the war in Iraq and is ending the war in Afghanistan.

    Yeah, he ended the Iraq War on the exact date Bush set, and was trying to stay longer. If you're happy that the Iraq war is over, you can thank the Iraqis for kicking us out. Obama had nothing to do with it.

    I'll believe that Obama is ending the Afghanistan war when the Afghanistan war actually ends. He could have left when he killed OBL. I don't know what he's waiting for, but it's unlikely it will ever come. Afghanistan is the graveyard of empires. Cut and run at the first opportunity is the only reasonable option.

    Yes, BHO killed OBL, but he's also killed american citizens. Even juveniles. I'm far more frightened of living in an America where the president can have citizens assassinated with no oversight or detained without habeas corpus than I am of living in the same world as OBL.

    Reality conflicts with your apologetics.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!