Slashdot Mirror


Santorum Defends Robocalls To Democrats

Hugh Pickens writes "The LA Times reports that Rick Santorum defended his robocalls urging Democrats in Michigan to vote in today's critical primary, a tactic that has come under withering criticism from rival Mitt Romney as a 'terrible dirty trick' and a 'new low for his campaign.' Santorum says he reached out to Democratic voters, who can vote in the primary, to show that 'we can attract voters we need to win states like Michigan,' and noted that the former Massachusetts governor has wooed Democrats in the past and used Santorum's own words endorsing him in the 2008 race on a robocall of his own. 'I didn't complain about it. I don't complain. You know what, I'm a big guy. I can take it.' Romney crossed party lines himself to vote for Paul Tsongas in the 1992 Democratic primary over Bill Clinton in order to cause mischief for the general election. 'In Massachusetts, if you register as an independent, you can vote in either the Republican or Democratic primary,' said Romney, who until he made an unsuccessful run for Senate in 1994 had spent his adult life as a registered independent."

42 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. Stop it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has no place on /.

    1. Re:Stop it. by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This has no place on /.

      I second this motion. All in favor?

    2. Re:Stop it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slashdot has always covered major political events, certainly presidential elections. Certain things are "New for Everyone", of which "News for Nerds" is a subset.

    3. Re:Stop it. by GodInHell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Aye.

    4. Re:Stop it. by bobcat7677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Aye! This is neither news for nerds (I'm sure everyone, nerd or otherwise, has already seen the headlines), nor does it matter (a gaggle of politicians posturing over trivialities of the campaign process is about as un-meaningful as it gets). Wake me up when it's time to vote.

    5. Re:Stop it. by forkfail · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And absolutely who the next president is - and the fight to get there - is going to have fallout that impacts the technical/nerd/geek world.

      The politicians and other powers that be are quite aware of our toys and the potential of what we do, and absolutely want to own and control it.

      --
      Check your premises.
    6. Re:Stop it. by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 5, Funny

      If Slashdot doesn't keep me minimally informed on political issues, then how am I going to know how much each candidate hates my freedom? How would I ever have known who was a traitor and who was against SOPA?

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    7. Re:Stop it. by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This has no place on /.

      Then what is this /. section called politics for then?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    8. Re:Stop it. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a major entertainment event though. Like reality TV, only with more crazy.

    9. Re:Stop it. by Darth+Snowshoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agree. This is part of a long Michigan tradition of crossover voting. Big deal.

      If they ever conclusively prove that Romney is a cyborg, that would be /.-worthy.

    10. Re:Stop it. by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Informative
      freakin' idiot troll.

      Frink:
      Why it's the AT-5000 Auto-Dialer. My very first patent.
      Aw, would you listen to the gibberish they've got you saying, it's sad and alarming.
      You were designed to alert schoolchildren about snow days and such.
      Well, let's get you home to Frinky. Hope your wheels still work, bw-hey.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    11. Re:Stop it. by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While it's true that the presidential election is important: a) it gets covered to death (and more) by the MSM, it's not one of those stories we might miss because it's on some news site we don't peruse often, and b) a story about robo-calling actually has little to do with the presidential election - it barely has anything to do with deciding who will even be a candidate.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    12. Re:Stop it. by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed.

      Romney will most likely either gut the internet, take out a massive loan on its assets to pay his management fee and then file bankruptcy on the internet, or sell it off to the (RI|MP)AA.

      Santorum will most likely burn it at the stake for its perversion, witchcraft and the definition of Santorum.

    13. Re:Stop it. by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nope.

      Ron Paul is A-OK with burning people at the stake, if that's done according to state laws (not federal ones).

  2. Contradiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Romney crossed party lines himself to vote for Paul Tsongas in the 1992 Democratic primary ...Romney, who until he made an unsuccessful run for Senate in 1994 had spent his adult life as a registered independent.

    So he didn't "cross party lines" then, did he?

    1. Re:Contradiction by sorak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would hate to think if voting in an opposing party's primary were a federal offense. As a liberal in a deeply red state, I know that the only vote I have is my vote in the GOP primary. They will vote "Not Obama", and the electoral college system assures that "Not Obama" will get my share of my state's votes. I should have some say in who "Not Obama" is.

      The only difference between what I'm doing and what Santorum is encouraging is that I am voting for the guy who I would want to see in office, if Obama loses. To me, it's important, but I understand that most people wouldn't care about that distinction.

  3. My roomba by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Funny

    My roomba got a robo call once telling him to vote skynet.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  4. Come over to the Netherlands, we'll euthanise him by slashbart · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since he says that half of the euthanisias in my country are against the will of the person dying, I'd like him to come over here, so we can add him to his own statistic. It seems he's going to be worse than Bush jr. WW-III anyone?

  5. How is this good for Santorum? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would Santorum want to engage Democrats in the Republican primary. He's the fringe right wing candidate. Romney is nigh indistinguishable from the Democratic incumbant. If a Democrat shows up at the Republican primary, the odds are very good that he'll vote Romney.

    The only way I can see a Democrat voting for Santorum in the primary is to help Obama win in the general election. Is Santorum banking on his own unelectability to win the primary? Or is that reading too much into this?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:How is this good for Santorum? by Skapare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Democrats would cross over to vote for Santorum just to sabotage any chance for Republicans to beat Obama. Santorum has no hope in the general election while Romney actually has a slim chance.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:How is this good for Santorum? by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Santorum is thinking of himself. Not the Republican party. Or the US in general. He's got this megalomaniacal mindset that says he's the only one that can run this country. But then that's true of most politicians.

      You would think that the sane candidate would be using his parties' primary to sound out his electability in the general election. But instead, all of them are playing to their parties' median, forgetting that they represent about half of the electorate. Not good team players IMO.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:How is this good for Santorum? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If that strategy backfires it would be illegal to pray to Cthulhu before the year is out.

      Pope Santorum of the newly established Church of America would outlaw all false gods- and any believe other than anything identical to what he believes.

      The scary thing is- under Santorums view of the government- the current foremost official on American religion is Obama. Think about it- if there is no seperation of church and state- Obama is currently the head executive official for American religion- technically the prez doesn't write laws- but he gets to sign laws based on his own personal religious view.

      What do people think of that?

      The people who should be most afraid of the wearing down on seperation of church and state should be the religious.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  6. Political parties = bad idea. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally I think they should do away with "special rights" of parties, etc.

    There is nothing in our constitution that creates- or gives special rights to political parties. There is nothing about our brand of democracy that benefits from having parties. George Washington actually called them a bad idea and thought the US should stay away from them.

    The government by including party affiliation on ballots- and helping organise- and give public spaces to primaries are interfering with fair elections- it gives an unfair advantage to the two largest parties and does not give a level playing field.

    Being a two-party system the majority of the population are pressured into voting for one of two ideologies. "an independant or a third-party can't win" is a common belief... certainly it is made harder by states allowing people to vote "straight-party ticket". This makes it harder for independants or third parties to be elected.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Political parties = bad idea. by medcalf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sadly, it's that opinion (which I broadly share) against math, and math is going to win. If you want to get rid of the two party system, you have to make a structural change. Something like partisan voting for the House, or a preferential system or some such. But as long as we are first past the post, only a two party system is stable.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  7. Re:Come over to the Netherlands, we'll euthanise h by Roberticus · · Score: 4, Funny

    WW-III anyone?

    I believe Santorum prefers to call it The Tenth Crusade.

  8. Dirty Trick? by necro81 · · Score: 3

    Calling on Democrats to come out and vote in the GOP primary? Might be a trick, but not something to get worked up over.

    Making robocalls, to anyone, ooooh now that's dirty. That deserves a beatin'

  9. Re:Robo-calls make me avoid your product. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seconded. And imagine the calls these people must have received:

    "Hi there Democrat voter, have you ever thought that you might like Santorum? A lot of people who at first found the idea repulsive were glad they tried playing on the other team and haven't gone back. I'm here to convince you that what would make America great, is a big heaping helping of Santorum."

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  10. Re:Robo-calls make me avoid your product. by vlm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thats what makes it a crazy story. Oldest trick in the book that "the other side" always votes for the most unelectable guy to make certain they can win against him. You have to be a total political noob to try this stunt of asking for D votes before the nomination, whoever the D vote for is who they think O will be able to easily beat. Which everyone knows is Santorum anyway. Thats why everyone who pays attention to this thought the Santorum (the guy, not the bodily fluid) robocalls were a "dirty trick" by Romney's guys to make Santorum look bad (well, he does a pretty good job all by himself, I mean help him look worse). Then Santorum is dumb enough to admit to doing the robocalls himself. That dude is doomed to never get the nomination after this little scuffle. If he wasn't a complete idiot he'd blame Romney for the robocalls to democrats in support of himself. Indications of a martyr complex?

    1. Find something that no one likes, like cross burning or robo calls.
    2. Spend money to frame competition for doing it.
    3. Profit! Or at least donations to you instead of competition, unless your stupid enough to admit you did it.

    I will say that the only thing worse that this would be getting caught and outed by your opponent. The only intelligent explanation is Santorum tried to frame Romney by paying for robo calls to democrats in support of himself, but Romney caught him and got the goods on him, "and for the greater good of the R party" the chiefs (big donors, etc) convinced Santorum to fall on his sword instead of getting totally destroyed by Romney outing him. Santorum will probably get a minor position in "reward" for falling on his sword. Not too high up, getting caught being a crook is rough on the reputation...

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  11. Yes, please. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps all the Democrats should heed Santorum's call to vote in the Michigan Republican primary - and vote for Ron Paul.
    That will show 'em. :-)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Yes, please. by DaMattster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As a democrat I cast my vote for Ron Paul. I know he doesn't stand much of chance but I am hopeful!

    2. Re:Yes, please. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thanks. I have many democrat-leaning friends who did the same thing.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    3. Re:Yes, please. by Beelzebud · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, if the Democrat ignores his voting record, his positions on social issues, or the racist newsletter he put his name on for a decade and made millions from.

  12. Operation Hilarity by jwhitener · · Score: 3, Informative
  13. Re:Santorum makes me sick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Of course, you shouldn't be eating it.

  14. Re:Robo-calls make me avoid your product. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can, however, be in favour of strengthening vocational training without foaming at the mouth about liberal colleges destroying America(TM), as he did last week.

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  15. Re:Robo-calls make me avoid your product. by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is just part of the Republican Party's unconscious effort to self-destruct.

    I'm not sure it's unconscious. I think they may be running a longer game. When McCain picked Sarah Palin as his running mate, I couldn't help wondering if he was deliberately throwing the 2008 election to Obama. Perhaps he saw the biggest economic shitstorm since the Depression approaching, and knew that it would be blamed on whoever was in office.

    If the GOP actually nominates Santorum, this will no longer be an unlikely-sounding conspiracy theory, but an irrefutable fact. It will mean that the Republicans are absolutely terrified of something that they're reasonably certain will happen in the next four years, and that they don't want anyone from their party in the Oval Office when it does.

    I'm not going to vote for Obama again, either way, but I'm glad I'm not in his shoes.

  16. Re:Come over to the Netherlands, we'll euthanise h by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No matter who is in the White House, there's a very good chance WWIII will be started on his watch. There's not one plausible candidate, D or R who doesn't have warmongering with Iran as a major part of their foreign policy platform.

    If anything, Obama is a bigger threat to world peace than Santorum. The cult of personality behind him has made most voters oblivious to the fact that he has doubled down on all the worst offenses of the Bush administration. Obama could ask for any power whatsoever, and the so-called "moderates" would hand it over to him just because he's "not Bush".

    I'd be extremely surprised if we didn't see an Obama reelection shortly followed by a propaganda blitz extremely similar to what we saw in the lead up to Iraq. And he'll get away with it, because people are more concerned about their team winning, than not being hypocrits.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  17. Re:Come over to the Netherlands, we'll euthanise h by wintercolby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All of the euthanasias in the US are against the will of the person dying, we just use the euphemism "death penalty". I'm constantly amazed at how the side that's "Pro-Life" is so intent on killing adults.

    --
    Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
  18. Re:Robo-calls make me avoid your product. by Peristaltic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But then if you buy into Santorums position that education is for snobs and if your not rabidly pro Christian your anti religion robo calls may work on you.

    The problem is that there are a -lot- of people out there that buy into Santorum's "message", manufactured by a sociopath, consumed by idiots.

    George Carlin's Theory of General Stupidity:

    Think of how stupid the average person is and then realize that half of them are stupider than that.

    applies very well here.

  19. Re:Robo-calls make me avoid your product. by rrohbeck · · Score: 4, Funny

    Frothing, not foaming.
    Remember Santorum frothes.

  20. Re:Come over to the Netherlands, we'll euthanise h by ultramk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Of course, he hasn't actually started any wars on his watch, unlike, say... every other US President going back to Carter. (No, a handful of drone strikes in Libya and Somalia don't count.) He did end the war in Iraq and is ending the war in Afghanistan. He got Bin Laden with a minimal incursion that didn't become a full-blown invasion.

    He's talking tough on Iran, but is showing no signs of actually planning for a military operation there. The budget cuts to the military show that.

    Reality conflicts with your fear-mongering and false equivalency.

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  21. Re:Come over to the Netherlands, we'll euthanise h by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, a handful of drone strikes in Libya and Somalia don't count.

    I think if a drone struck your home, you might have a different opinion on whether that's an act of war. Although, Libya would be a rather minor transgression, if he hadn't violated the War Powers Act by staying there past the deadline.

    He did end the war in Iraq and is ending the war in Afghanistan.

    Yeah, he ended the Iraq War on the exact date Bush set, and was trying to stay longer. If you're happy that the Iraq war is over, you can thank the Iraqis for kicking us out. Obama had nothing to do with it.

    I'll believe that Obama is ending the Afghanistan war when the Afghanistan war actually ends. He could have left when he killed OBL. I don't know what he's waiting for, but it's unlikely it will ever come. Afghanistan is the graveyard of empires. Cut and run at the first opportunity is the only reasonable option.

    Yes, BHO killed OBL, but he's also killed american citizens. Even juveniles. I'm far more frightened of living in an America where the president can have citizens assassinated with no oversight or detained without habeas corpus than I am of living in the same world as OBL.

    Reality conflicts with your apologetics.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!